DOCSLIB.ORG

Archean Evolution of the Southern São Francisco

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archean Evolution of the Southern São Francisco ARCHEAN EVOLUTION OF THE SOUTHERN SÃO FRANCISCO CRATON (SE BRAZIL) i ii FUNDAÇÃO UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE OURO PRETO Reitor Cláudia Aparecida Marliére de Lima Vice-Reitor Hermínio Arias Nalini Júnior Pró-Reitor de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação Sérgio Francisco de Aquino ESCOLA DE MINAS Diretor Issamu Endo Vice-Diretor José Geraldo Arantes de Azevedo Brito DEPARTAMENTO DE GEOLOGIA Chefe Luis Antônio Rosa Seixas iii EVOLUÇÃO CRUSTAL E RECURSOS NATURAIS iv CONTRIBUIÇÕES ÀS CIÊNCIAS DA TERRA - VOL. 349 TESE DE DOUTORAMENTO ARCHEAN EVOLUTION OF THE SOUTHERN SÃO FRANCISCO CRATON (SE BRAZIL) Capucine Albert Orientador Dr. Cristiano de Carvalho Lana Co-orientador Dr. Federico Farina Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Evolução Crustal e Recursos Naturais do Departamento de Geologia da Escola de Minas da Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto como requisito parcial à obtenção do Título de Doutor, Área de Concentração: Tectônica, Petrogênese e Recursos Minerais OURO PRETO 2017 v vii viii Acknowledgements Many people have contributed toward the realization of this project, bringing their geological knowledge, financial or logistic support and moral encouragements, and I have every person to acknowledge and thank for their contribution, whether small or big. Thank you! Cristiano, I am indebted to you for providing me with the opportunity to do research, and for all your support throughout the years. I am particularly grateful for your enthusiasm, your trust, and your availability. Thank you for the time and effort you dedicate to your students, providing us with the opportunity to be involved in scientific discussions, and for letting us follow our own research interests and ideas. I feel truly privileged to have been a part of the dynamic group you have built, and to have had you as a mentor. Federico, your patience and your advices as I was taking my first steps into the world of research have really been priceless. Thank you for your support, your friendship, all the good laughs, and for your blunt honesty, which has me question and improve myself every time. I would like to acknowledge all those who, by sharing their knowledge have contributed one way or another to this project. I want to give a special mention to Craig Storey and Axel Gerdes, for your valuable collaboration and the stimulating discussions every time our paths have crossed. Thanks to the both of you, as well as Márcio Pimentel and Ricardo Scholz for having accepted to read and evaluate this work. I would like to extend my thanks to Gary Stevens, Jean-François Moyen, Fernando Alkmim and Ian Buick, with whom I have had the chance to discuss and exchange ideas on a regular basis. I am grateful to all the people I have met during these four years, who have enriched my life and experience in the lab and outside, I couldn‘t have done it without all of you. Special mention to G and Cynthia, for all the adventures and travels, the laughter, the encouragements and your friendship, see you soon! To all my fellow officemates, Francesco, Mari, Fabiana, Marcha and Kai, and all the others, part of the group in Ouro Preto, Hugo Boss, Dr. C, Leo, Carmen 1, Carmen 2, Ana, Lorena, Jessica and many others, as well as Camille et Julien (alias Gulen) sur la fin. You guys rock! Thanks to all the crew in Stellenbosch, Shawn Kittchy, Tolene, Stephan the Red, Duncan, Andrea, Simon, Marcos and Valby, for all the wine and the good times (Ons gaan nou braai!). And finally, last but not least, Matzi, I am so lucky to have you by my side. Mum and Dad, thank you for your unfailing support before and during my PhD, for cultivating our curiosity, and for letting us pursue what we are passionate about. ix x Summary ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................ IX SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... XI LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... XV LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... XVII ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... XIX RESUMO .......................................................................................................................................... XXI CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 THE SECULAR EVOLUTION OF THE CONTINENTAL CRUST ................................. 5 1.2.1 Crustal growth ........................................................................................................ 5 1.2.2 Geodynamic evolution .......................................................................................... 10 1.3 ARCHEAN CRATONS ................................................................................................... 15 1.3.1 Archean granitoids ................................................................................................ 15 1.3.2 Greenstone belts.................................................................................................... 24 1.3.3 Architecture of Archean granite-greenstone terranes ........................................... 26 1.4 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................. 28 CHAPTER 2 - THE ARCHEAN-PALEOPROTEROZOIC EVOLUTION OF THE QUADRILÁTERO FERRÍFERO (BRAZIL): CURRENT MODELS AND OPEN QUESTIONS ............................................................................................................................................................... 31 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................ 31 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 32 2.2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARIES ....................... 32 2.3 MAIN GEOLOGICAL FEATURES ................................................................................ 34 2.4 THE ARCHEAN METAMORPHIC COMPLEXES ........................................................ 36 2.4.1 Field relationships and petrography ...................................................................... 36 2.4.2 Geochemistry: medium- and high-K granitoids ................................................... 38 2.4.3 Geochronology ..................................................................................................... 41 2.5 THE RIO DAS VELHAS SUPERGROUP ....................................................................... 43 2.5.1 Stratigraphy........................................................................................................... 43 2.5.2 Geochronology ..................................................................................................... 45 2.6 THE MINAS SUPERGROUP .......................................................................................... 47 2.6.1 Main stratigraphic features ................................................................................... 47 2.6.2 Tamanduá and Caraça Groups .............................................................................. 47 2.6.3 Itabira Group ......................................................................................................... 49 2.6.4 Piracicaba Group .................................................................................................. 50 2.6.5 Sabará Group ........................................................................................................ 50 2.7 THE ITACOLOMI GROUP ............................................................................................. 53 xi 2.8 MAFIC AND INTERMEDIATE DIKES, BOUDINS AND LENSES ............................. 54 2.9 MAIN STRUCTURES AND STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION ......................................... 55 2.10 DISCUSSION: MODELS AND OPEN PROBLEMS ...................................................... 56 2.10.1 Building up the continental crust: the Paleo- to Mesoarchean rock record ........ 56 2.10.2 The record of plate tectonics: the Meso-Neoarchean .......................................... 57 2.10.3 Evolution of the Minas Basin .............................................................................. 59 2.10.4 The Minas accretionary orogeny ......................................................................... 59 2.10.5 Questions for future research .............................................................................. 62 CHAPTER 3 - THE NEOARCHEAN TRANSITION BETWEEN MEDIUM- AND HIGH-K GRANITOIDS: CLUES FROM THE SOUTHERN SÃO FRANCISCO CRATON (BRAZIL) . 65 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................ 65 3.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 66 3.2 REGIONAL GEOLOGY .................................................................................................. 67 3.2.1 The Southern São Francisco craton......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assembly, Configuration, and Break-Up History of Rodinia
    Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Precambrian Research 160 (2008) 179–210 Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis Z.X. Li a,g,∗, S.V. Bogdanova b, A.S. Collins c, A. Davidson d, B. De Waele a, R.E. Ernst e,f, I.C.W. Fitzsimons g, R.A. Fuck h, D.P. Gladkochub i, J. Jacobs j, K.E. Karlstrom k, S. Lu l, L.M. Natapov m, V. Pease n, S.A. Pisarevsky a, K. Thrane o, V. Vernikovsky p a Tectonics Special Research Centre, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia b Department of Geology, Lund University, Solvegatan 12, 223 62 Lund, Sweden c Continental Evolution Research Group, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia d Geological Survey of Canada (retired), 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0E8 e Ernst Geosciences, 43 Margrave Avenue, Ottawa, Canada K1T 3Y2 f Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton U., Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6 g Tectonics Special Research Centre, Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia h Universidade de Bras´ılia, 70910-000 Bras´ılia, Brazil i Institute of the Earth’s Crust SB RAS, Lermontova Street, 128, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia j Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway k Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northrop Hall University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA l Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, CGS, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypogene Cave Patterns in Iron Ore Caves: Convergence of Forms Or Processes?
    A. AULER, L. PILÓ, C. PARKER, J. SENKO, I. SASOWSKY, H. Barton HYPOGENE CAVE PATTERNS IN IRON ORE CAVES: CONVERGENCE OF FORMS OR PROCESSES? Augusto S. Auler1, Luís B. Piló1, Ceth W. Parker2, John M. Senko2,3, Ira D. Sasowsky3, and Hazel A. Barton2,3 peleogenesis in iron ore caves may involve generation of porosity at depth with a later surficial phase associated Swith slope hydrological processes. The earlier phreatic phase results in morphological features similar to but much more irregular at wall and ceiling scale than what is observed in hypo- gene caves. Processes responsible for the generation of caves do not seem to follow normal karst geochemical paths, but instead occur through bacterially mediated redox reactions. INTRODUCTION Caves and small voids in iron-rich rocks have been reported in the Brazilian geological literature since the 19th Century, but only recently, due to the expansion of iron mines, have they been subject to detailed studies. Initial research was performed by American geologists from the United States Geological Sur- vey in the Iron Quadrangle region of southeastern Brazil, with George C. Simmons providing pioneering insights on cave gen- esis and mineralogy (Simmons, 1963; 1964). Since 2005, with the increase in iron ore prices and the regulatory mandate to as- sess the significance of any void over 5 m in length, intensive research has resulted in the identification of approximately 3,000 caves, the majority of them being located in the two major iron ore provinces, Carajás ridge in northern Brazil (Amazonia) and the Iron Quadrangle area (Fig. 1). Cave mapping and geospele- ological studies have provided new insights on the morphology and genesis of these enigmatic and little known caves.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    ISSN 2683-9288 Science Reviews Volume 1 Number 1 from the end of the world December 2019 Susana Fedrano - “El ala” (1991) Science Reviews from the end of the world Science Reviews - from the end of the world is a quaterly publication that aims at providing authoritative reviews on hot research topics developed mainly by scientists that carry out their work far away from the main centers of science. Its research reviews are short, concise, critical and easy-reading articles describing the state of the art on a chosen hot topic, with focus on the research carried out by the authors of the article. These articles are commissioned by invitation and are accessible not only to hardcore specialists, but also to a wider readership of researchers interested in learning about the state-of-the-art in the reviewed subject. The reviews cover all fields of science and are written exclusively in English. They are refereed by peers of international prestige and the evaluation process follows standard international procedures. Centro de Estudios sobre Ciencia, Desarrollo y Educación Superior 538 Pueyrredón Av. - 2° C – Second building Buenos Aires, Argentina - C1032ABS (54 11) 4963-7878/8811 [email protected] www.scirevfew.net Vol. 1, No. 1 December 2019 AUTHORITIES AAPC President Science Reviews Susana Hernández from the end of the world Centro REDES President María Elina Estébanez Table of Contents EDITORIAL COMMITTEE EDITORIAL Editor-in-Chief An editorial anomaly 4 Miguel A. Blesa Miguel A. Blesa Co-Editors IN THIS ISSUE Daniel Cardinali (Medicine) List of authors Vol. 1, No. 1 Diego de Mendoza (Biochemistry 5 and Molecular Biology) Fabio Doctorovich (Chemistry) ARTICLES Esteban G.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Proterozoic Terranes in Southern South America: from Rodinia to Gondwana
    + MODEL GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS -(-) (2011) 1e9 available at www.sciencedirect.com China University of Geosciences (Beijing) GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gsf REVIEW A history of Proterozoic terranes in southern South America: From Rodinia to Gondwana C. Casquet a,*, C.W. Rapela b, R.J. Pankhurst c, E.G. Baldo d, C. Galindo a, C.M. Fanning e, J.A. Dahlquist d, J. Saavedra f a Departamento de Petrologıa y Geoquımica, IGEO (Universidad Complutense, CSIC), 28040 Madrid, Spain b Centro de Investigaciones Geologicas (CONICET-UNLP), 1900 La Plata, Argentina c Visiting Research Associate, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, United Kingdom d CICTERRA (CONICET-UNC), 5000 Cordoba, Argentina e Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia f Instituto de Agrobiologıa y Recursos Naturales CSIC, 37071 Salamanca, Spain Received 3 August 2011; accepted 8 November 2011 KEYWORDS Abstract The role played by Paleoproterozoic cratons in southern South America from the Mesopro- Paleoproterozoic; terozoic to the Early Cambrian is reconsidered here. This period involved protracted continental amal- Cratons; gamation that led to formation of the supercontinent Rodinia, followed by Neoproterozoic continental Grenvillian; break-up, with the consequent opening of Clymene and Iapetus oceans, and finally continental Neoproterozoic rifting; re-assembly as Gondwana through complex oblique collisions in the Late Neoproterozoic to Early SW Gondwana assembly Cambrian. The evidence for this is based mainly on a combination of precise U-Pb SHRMP dating and radiogenic isotope data for igneous and metamorphic rocks from a large area extending from the Rio de la Plata craton in the east to the Argentine Precordillera in the west and as far north as Arequipa in Peru.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making and Unmaking of a Supercontinent: Rodinia Revisited
    Tectonophysics 375 (2003) 261–288 www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto The making and unmaking of a supercontinent: Rodinia revisited Joseph G. Meerta,*, Trond H. Torsvikb a Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, 241 Williamson Hall, PO Box 11210 Gainesville, FL 32611, USA b Academy of Sciences (VISTA), c/o Geodynamics Center, Geological Survey of Norway, Leif Eirikssons vei 39, Trondheim 7491, Norway Received 11 April 2002; received in revised form 7 January 2003; accepted 5 June 2003 Abstract During the Neoproterozoic, a supercontinent commonly referred to as Rodinia, supposedly formed at ca. 1100 Ma and broke apart at around 800–700 Ma. However, continental fits (e.g., Laurentia vs. Australia–Antarctica, Greater India vs. Australia– Antarctica, Amazonian craton [AC] vs. Laurentia, etc.) and the timing of break-up as postulated in a number of influential papers in the early–mid-1990s are at odds with palaeomagnetic data. The new data necessitate an entirely different fit of East Gondwana elements and western Gondwana and call into question the validity of SWEAT, AUSWUS models and other variants. At the same time, the geologic record indicates that Neoproterozoic and early Paleozoic rift margins surrounded Laurentia, while similar-aged collisional belts dissected Gondwana. Collectively, these geologic observations indicate the breakup of one supercontinent followed rapidly by the assembly of another smaller supercontinent (Gondwana). At issue, and what we outline in this paper, is the difficulty in determining the exact geometry of the earlier supercontinent. We discuss the various models that have been proposed and highlight key areas of contention. These include the relationships between the various ‘external’ Rodinian cratons to Laurentia (e.g., Baltica, Siberia and Amazonia), the notion of true polar wander (TPW), the lack of reliable paleomagnetic data and the enigmatic interpretations of the geologic data.
    [Show full text]
  • Proterozoic First-Order Sedimentary Sequences of the Sao Francisco
    Marine and Petroleum Geology 33 (2012) 127e139 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine and Petroleum Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpetgeo Proterozoic first-order sedimentary sequences of the São Francisco craton, eastern Brazil Fernando F. Alkmima,*, Marcelo A. Martins-Netob a Departamento de Geologia, Escola de Minas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Morro do Cruzeiro, 35.400.000 Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil b Vicenza Mineração, Av. Agulhas Negras, 580, Mangabeiras, 30210-340 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil article info abstract Article history: The São Francisco craton in eastern Brazil hosts sedimentary sequences deposited between the Paleo- Received 4 May 2010 archean (w3300 Ma) and Late Neoproterozoic (w580 Ma). Proterozoic successions occurring in this Received in revised form region comprise five 1st-order sedimentary sequences, which besides episodes of global significance 15 August 2011 record major basin-forming events. The ca. 8000 m-thick Minas-Itacolomi 1st-order sequence, exposed Accepted 18 August 2011 in the Brazilian mining district of the Quadrilátero Ferrífero and containing as marker bed the Lake Available online 5 September 2011 Superior-type Cauê Banded Iron Formation, tracks the operation of a Wilson cycle in the Paleoproterozoic Era. The quartz-arenite dominated Espinhaço I and II sequences record at least two major rift-sag basin- Keywords: First-order sequences forming events, which affected the host continent of the São Francisco craton at around 1.75 Ga and Proterozoic 1.57 Ga. The Macaúbas sequence and its correlatives in the extracratonic domains witness the individ- São Francisco craton ualization of a São Francisco-Congo plate in synchronicity with the break-up of Rodinia in the Cryogenian Brazil period.
    [Show full text]
  • Boletim 2019 P2
    Boletim de Resumos do 22º Seminário do Programa de Pós-graduação em Geologia UFPR 25 a 29 de Junho de 2019 Lara F. Neves Comissão organizadora Bruno Henrique de Moura Merss Carolina Danielski Aquino Francisco José Fonseca Ferreira Hérlon da Silva Costa Saulo Pomponet Oliveira Sérgio Eduardo Pereira Jaensch 22º Seminário do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geologia Departamento de Geologia - Universidade Federal do Paraná 24 a 28 de junho de 2019 Curitiba - PR Quimioestratigrafia dos Carbonatos Lacustres Aptianos da Porção Sudeste da Bacia de Santos Joana Caroline de Freitas Rosin [email protected] Orientador(a): Profª. Drª.Anelize Bahniuk Rumbelsperger (Departamento de Geologia/UFPR) Palavras-chave: estratigrafia química, carbonatos continentais, pré-sal Introdução Com diversas descobertas de hidrocarbonetos na última década e produzindo bilhões de barris por dia, o play petrolífero denominado “pré-sal”, é um dos mais importantes do mundo. A sequência corresponde a uma acumulação de até 4000m de sedimentos, equivalente a fase rift e sag/transicional na Bacia de Santos. Localizada na região sudeste da margem continental brasileira, entre os paralelos 23° e 28° Sul, a bacia ocupa cerca de 352.000 km2 e foi gerada a partir de processos de rifteamento durante a separação do paleocontinente Gondwana, no Mesozóico. Contendo espessuras superiores a 10km nos principais depocentros, a acumulação dos sedimentos ocorreu inicialmente em condições flúvio-lacustres, passando para estágio de bacia evaporítica e até o desenvolvimento de bacia de margem passiva (CHANG et al., 2008). O rifte Sul-Atlântico propagou-se de sul para norte, com estruturas de direção aproximada ENE– WSW na Bacia de Santos, uma margem oblíqua (Buckley et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Consent in Writing of the Incorporator
    JUPITER GOLD ACQUIRES GOLD CLAIM IN THE WELL-KNOWN QUADRILÁTERO FERRÍFERO BELO HORIZONTE, BRAZIL--(August 12, 2016) – Jupiter Gold Corporation (“Jupiter Gold” or the “Company”) is a new Brazil-focused gold company. Today, Jupiter Gold, through its local subsidiary, received from the Brazilian mining department, Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral (“DNPM”), the ownership for the mineral right designated by the number 831.942/2016 in DNPM's database. Its current status level is that of request for exploration permit ("Requerimento de Pesquisa”), the initial stage for a mineral property. Location Mineral right DNPM 831.942/2016 crosses into the municipalities of Dionisio, Marliéria, e São Domingos do Prata, all in the state of Minas Gerais, in Brazil. These municipalities are within the greater Itabira area. Itabira is a city with 108,000 people and is part of the "Quadrilátero Ferrífero" (Iron Quadrangle), roughly a geographical quadrangle in shape with the largest iron mines in Brazil and underground gold mines. Size DNPM 831.942/2016 has a surface area of 1,889.51 hectares (approximately 4,669 acres). Coordinates The coordinates of DNPM 831.942/2016 are as follows (using SIRGAS2000): 1 Latitude Longitude -19°46'15''600 -42°49'22''800 -19°46'55''200 -42°49'22''800 -19°46'55''200 -42°48'21''600 -19°49'19''200 -42°48'21''600 -19°49'19''200 -42°49'22''800 -19°49'40''800 -42°49'22''800 -19°49'40''800 -42°50'02''400 -19°49'01''200 -42°50'02''400 -19°49'01''200 -42°50'27''600 -19°46'15''600 -42°50'27''600 -19°46'15''600 -42°49'22''800 Map Map – Mineral Right DNPM 831.942/2016 2 Other Information DNPM 831.942/2016 is located within the well-known area in the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil called the "Iron Quadrangle".
    [Show full text]
  • U-Pb Geochronologic Evidence for the Evolution of the Gondwanan Margin of the North-Central Andes
    U-Pb geochronologic evidence for the evolution of the Gondwanan margin of the north-central Andes David M. Chew† Urs Schaltegger Department of Mineralogy, University of Geneva, Rue des Maraîchers 13, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland Jan Košler Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway Martin J. Whitehouse Laboratory for Isotope Geology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, S-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Marcus Gutjahr Institute for Isotope Geology and Mineral Resources, ETH-Zentrum, Clausiusstrasse 25, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland Richard A. Spikings Aleksandar Miškovi´c Department of Mineralogy, University of Geneva, Rue des Maraîchers 13, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland ABSTRACT zircon overgrowths from amphibolite-facies limited because they are either obscured by later schists, which reveals metamorphic events tectonic events along the convergent margin or We investigated the Neoproterozoic–early at ca. 478 and ca. 312 Ma and refutes the buried by the ubiquitous volcanic cover. Paleozoic evolution of the Gondwanan mar- previously assumed Neoproterozoic age for This problem is particularly acute in the gin of the north-central Andes by employing orogeny in the Peruvian Eastern Cordillera. north-central Andes, where Precambrian base- U-Pb zircon geochronology in the Eastern The presence of an Ordovician magmatic ment is not exposed for over 2000 km along Cordilleras of Peru and Ecuador using a and metamorphic belt in the north-central strike, from 15°S in Peru to 2°S in Colombia. combination of laser-ablation–inductively Andes demonstrates that Famatinian meta- This corresponds to the distance between the coupled plasma–mass spectrometry detrital morphism and subduction-related mag- northern extent of the Arequipa-Antofalla base- zircon analysis and dating of syn- and post- matism were continuous from Patagonia ment (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • From Rodinia to Gondwana
    A history of Proterozoic terranes in southern South America: From Rodinia to Gondwana C. Casquet a,*, c.w. Rapela b, R.J. Pankhurst c, E.G. Baldo d, C. Galindo a, C.M. Fanning e, J.A. Dahlquist d, J. Saavedra f a Departamento de Petrologia y Geoquimica, ICEO (Universidad Complutense, CSIC), 28040 Madrid, Spain b Centra de Investigaciones Geologicas (CONICET-UNLP), 1900 La Plata, Argentina C 'Visiting Research Associate, British Geological SUlVey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 SCC, United Kingdom d CICTERRA (CONICET-UNC), 5000 Cordoba, Argentina e Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia f Instituto de Agrobiologia y Recursos Naturales CSIC, 37071 Salamanca, Spain KEYWORDS Abstract The role played by Paleoproterozoic cratons in southern South America from the Mesopro­ Paleoproterozoic; terozoic to the Early Cambrian is reconsidered here. This period involved protracted continental amal­ Cratons; gamation that led to formation of the supercontinent Rodinia, followed by N eoproterozoic continental Grenvillian; break-up, with the consequent opening of Clymene and Iapetus oceans, and finally continental Neoproterozoic rifting; re-assembly as Gondwana through complex oblique collisions in the Late Neoproterozoic to Early SW Gondwana assembly Cambrian. The evidence for this is based mainly on a combination of precise U-Pb SHRMP dating and radiogenic isotope data for igneous and metamorphic rocks from a large area extending from the Rio de la Plata craton in the east to the Argentine Precordillera in the west and as far north as Arequipa in Peru. Our interpretation of the paleogeograpbical and geodynamic evolution invokes a hypothetical Paleoproterozoic block (MARA) embracing basement ultimately older than 1.7 Ga in the Western Sierras 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Geospatial Data for the Mineral Industries and Related Infrastructure of Latin America and the Caribbean
    Compilation of Geospatial Data for the Mineral Industries and Related Infrastructure of Latin America and the Caribbean Open-File Report 2017–1079 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Compilation of Geospatial Data for the Mineral Industries and Related Infrastructure of Latin America and the Caribbean By Michael S. Baker, Spencer D. Buteyn, Philip A. Freeman, Michael H. Trippi, and Loyd M. Trimmer III Prepared in cooperation with the Inter-American Development Bank Open-File Report 2017–1079 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. The material in this publication does not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the Inter-American Devel- opment Bank (IDB) or the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitations of its frontiers or boundaries, including disputed terrestrial or maritime claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Page numbers in italic denote figures. Page numbers in bold denote tables. Accra Plains Migmatite, correlation with Me´dio Coreau´ Bafia Group 86 domain 102–103, 114 Bahia–Gabon continental bridge 153, 154 Adamastor ocean Baixo Araguaia Supergroup 174, 299 closure 260, 265, 269, 270, 271, 271, 273 geochronology 184, 189, 190, 191 subduction 229, 231 Baltica Adamawa fault 92 palaeogeography 13–16, 14, 15, 17,22–23 Adamawa–Yade´ domain 85, 85, 87, 88,90–91 palaeomagnetic poles 10, 11 Afagados do Ingrazeira fault 72 Bambui Group 165, 201, 206 A´ gua Clara domain 241, 242 Bandeirinha Formation 36, 36, 37 A´ guas Belas–Caninde´ suite 80, 81 Bangweulu block 33, 43–45 Akanyaru Supergroup 33, 41–43, 45 Baoule´ –Mossi domain 142–144 Albian gap 379, 382, 384, 392 Barro Alto complex 204 Ale´m Paraı´ba shear zone 222 basalt, Brazilian margin 373 Algodo˜es Unit 53 basins Alto Moxoto´ terrane 72, 77, 92 sag Alto Pajeu´ terrane 72, 73, 77, 78, 92 Espirito Santo Basin 379 Amazonia Sa˜o Francisco craton 33, 34, 35–36, 39 palaeogeography 13–16, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22–23 salt, Brazilian margin 366–370, 367, 375 palaeomagnetic poles 12,13 sedimentary Amazonian craton 102 Borborema Province 56 geochronology 177, 189, 191 Garupi Belt 141 Andrelaˆndia Group 164, 202, 205, 217 Parana´ –Cape–Karoo 319–337 Angola craton 4, 5, 223, 224, 225–226 rift, Brazilian margin, uplifted flanks 383–387 correlation with Cabo Frio terrane 292 Sa˜o Francisco–Congo craton 33–46 Apiaı´ terrane 214, 218, 221, 222–223, 229 Sa˜o Luı´s craton 140, 141 Apparent Polar Wander Path
    [Show full text]