Consciousness of God As God Is: the Phenomenology of Christian Centering Prayer
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CONSCIOUSNESS OF GOD AS GOD IS: THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF CHRISTIAN CENTERING PRAYER BY BENNO ALEXANDER BLASCHKE A dissertation submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington (2017) Abstract In this study I aim to give an alternative approach to the way we theorise in the philosophy and comparative study of mysticism. Specifically, I aim to shift debate on the phenomenal nature of contemplative states of consciousness away from textual sources and towards reliable and descriptively rich first-person data originating in contemporary practices of lived traditions. The heart of this dissertation lies in rich qualitative interview data obtained through recently developed second-person approaches in the science of consciousness. I conducted in-depth phenomenological interviews with 20 Centering Prayer teachers and practitioners. The interviews covered the larger trajectory of their contemplative paths and granular detail of the dynamics of recent seated prayer sessions. I aided my second-person method with a “radical participation” approach to fieldwork at St Benedict’s Monastery in Snowmass. In this study I present nuanced phenomenological analyses of the first-person data regarding the beginning to intermediate stages of the Christian contemplative path, as outlined by the Centering Prayer tradition and described by Centering Prayer contemplatives. My presentation of the phenomenology of Centering Prayer is guided by a synthetic map of Centering Prayer’s (Keating School) contemplative path and model of human consciousness, which is grounded in the first-person data obtained in this study and takes into account the tradition’s primary sources. This includes: (1) an outline of the stages of the contemplative path; (2) the levels of consciousness (ordinary, spiritual and divine) and the type of experiential content (coarse, subtle and very subtle/divine presence) proper to each stage of the path; and (3) corresponding types of self (false, true and separate-self sense). My study addresses three meta-issues in the field pertaining to method, description and theory. First, I offer a new framework for the comparative study of contemplative practices and experiences, alongside a sound second-person method for collecting first- person data from contemplative practitioners. Second, I provide an effective framework for developing phenomenological accounts that are descriptively faithful, analytically transparent and theoretically useful. Third, I draw on the phenomenological accounts developed in this study to reconsider important theses advanced in the contemporary philosophy and comparative study of mysticism. On this basis, I argue that practitioners phenomenally apprehend union states, specifically prayer of full union, through experiential primitives, such as a “sense of presence”, and without a “God-identification element”. Consequently, union states are phenomenologically of an unidentified reality and therefore not theistic, in Katz’s and Pike’s senses. However, there might be some sense in which they are phenomenologically of God, 1 because they could be practitioners’ consciousness of God as God is; but this would empirically disconfirm received views of how God should be experienced. This finding challenges arguments for a unique theistic experience, designed to uphold a fundamental distinction between theistic and nontheistic experiences. Since Christian practitioners do not necessarily have unique theistic experiences in union, in the way that Katz and Pike require, there is at least some sense in which contemplatives from different traditions and cultures could have experiences similar in content and structure. 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost I want to thank my adviser, Dr Michael Radich, for being patient, honestly caring, and professionally available in many exceptional ways ever since I first met him in his office. Without his humble presence in my life and a critical meeting during my first undergraduate year at Victoria University, I would have decided against placing trust in academia to further my intellectual and philosophical development. Additionally, I want to thank him for diligently walking me through this dissertation as my supervisor, and all the advice I have received from him, which was plentiful. Finally, I want to thank him for placing trust in me to succeed and for backing me in this work from beginning to end, during a divorce and cancer diagnosis, and even though he understood that this project had a reasonable chance of failure due to significant challenges involved in method and getting access to hard-to-reach expert communities. I owe Prof Joseph Bulbulia a great debt for sharing his experience and pragmatic perspective at a time I needed to make difficult decisions; to Prof Chris Marshall’s example; to Dr Cei Maslen, who offered expedient support and feedback when I trained in philosophy many years ago; to Prof John Dunne for opening my eyes to the fact that I am misplaced in religious studies; to Prof Andrew Dreitcer for introducing me to Centering Prayer at the Mind and Life Summer Research Institute 2011; and to Prof (retraité) Maurice Legault for training me in the Explicitation Interview Method. I am further and much indebted to the teachers, practitioners and spiritual communities of Pointing Out Way Tibetan Buddhist Mahamudra and Christian Centering Prayer for having received me, taught me and shared with me. I give special thanks to a few senior teachers and advanced practitioners (who cannot be named here) for introducing me to new ways of analysing and talking about contemplative states of consciousness, and for indulging my interest in comparative research. Many practitioners cross-practice and some teachers have taught for decades in each faith, Buddhist and Christian. I give thanks to them for receiving data from me that originated in the other tradition, which was not of their current affiliation, and then discussing with me the farther reaches of their respective contemplative paths, also by way of detailed comparative analyses of “awakened awareness” (Tibetan) and the “presence of God” (Christian). I also want to thank my logical family. I give thanks to my twin brother, Tom, for reminding me of my own humanity, giving me joy and making me play; and to my sister, Sarah-May, for caring after me, seeing the best in me, giving me advice when needed, and being an excellent researcher who can see what I see, and sometimes more. I want to express my deep gratitude to Angela Mellish for her friendship and care for me, and for having 3 enabled me for many years throughout my studies. Without her, my life as I know it today, and the future that stands before me, would not be possible. I give special thanks to Sarah Barnett, who immeasurably enriches my life and loves me for who and how I am. I thank her for wrestling with me and for me, and for having helped me come to terms with my personal existence. With her help I’ve become a member of the LBGTQ family, completely re-oriented my personal life and finally made peace with my place in the world. This I consider an invaluable gift, especially in light of the shorter life I will live due to terminal illness. My academic endeavours are an act of gratitude in response to a gift I received from Dr David R. Hawkins. I hope my present and future work can do this gift justice. Finally, I thank the presence of God for awareness of existence, and its experiential content I know as life. 4 Glória in excélsis Deo 5 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2 Theory, Design and Method ............................................................................................ 18 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 18 2.2. A New Framework for the Comparative Study of Contemplative Practices and Experiences .......................................................................................................................... 19 2.3. Research Design ......................................................................................................................... 23 2.4. Revising Phenomenology as a Second-Person Method for Qualitative Research in Contemplative Studies ............................................................................................................... 26 2.5. Conceptual Framework ............................................................................................................. 32 2.6. Fieldwork and the Scholar-Practitioner Perspective ............................................................... 48 2.7. Method ....................................................................................................................................... 50 2.8. Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 66 Chapter 3 The Contemplative Path of Centering Prayer ............................................................ 73 3.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 73 3.2. Apophatic and Path-Oriented Contemplative Practice ............................................................74