DOCSLIB.ORG

SLR Report Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SLR Report Template ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL Holyoakes Field First School Prepared for: Jacobs UK Limited SLR Ref: 404.04946.00016 Version No:1 January 2019 Jacobs UK Limited Holyoakes Field First School – Ecological Appraisal 404.04946.00016: Filename: 190207_404.04946.00016 HolyoakesFieldFirstSchool_EA_JH_MPM_vf1 v1 February 2019 BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by SLR Consulting Limited with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with Jacobs UK Limited (the Client) as part or all of the services it has been appointed by the Client to carry out. It is subject to the terms and conditions of that appointment. SLR shall not be liable for the use of or reliance on any information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this document for any purpose by any person other than the Client. Reliance may be granted to a third party only in the event that SLR and the third party have executed a reliance agreement or collateral warranty. Information reported herein may be based on the interpretation of public domain data collected by SLR, and/or information supplied by the Client and/or its other advisors and associates. These data have been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. The copyright and intellectual property in all drawings, reports, specifications, bills of quantities, calculations and other information set out in this report remain vested in SLR unless the terms of appointment state otherwise. This document may contain information of a specialised and/or highly technical nature and the Client is advised to seek clarification on any elements which may be unclear to it. Information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this document should only be relied upon in the context of the whole document and any documents referenced explicitly herein and should then only be used within the context of the appointment. Jacobs UK Limited Holyoakes Field First School – Ecological Appraisal 404.04946.00016: Filename: 190207_404.04946.00016 HolyoakesFieldFirstSchool_EA_JH_MPM_vf1 v1 February 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Details of Proposed Development ............................................................................................... 3 1.2 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................3 1.3 Scope of Ecological Works ............................................................................................................3 1.4 Purpose of this Report .................................................................................................................. 4 RELEVANT LEGISLATION AND PLANNING POLICY3 .............................................................. 5 2.1 Relevant Legislation ......................................................................................................................5 2.1.1 Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 ............................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) ........................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Protection of Badgers Act 1992 .................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.4 Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act 2006 ..................................................................................... 5 2.2 Relevant Planning Policy ............................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 National Planning Policy ............................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.2 Local Planning Policy ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Desk Study ....................................................................................................................................9 3.2 Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey ................................................................................................ 9 3.3 Limitations ................................................................................................................................. 10 ECOLOGICAL BASELINE .................................................................................................... 11 4.1 General Site Description ............................................................................................................ 11 4.2 Designated Sites ........................................................................................................................ 11 4.2.1 Statutory Designated Sites ......................................................................................................................................... 11 4.3 Non-Statutory Designated Nature Conservation Sites ............................................................. 12 4.4 Habitats ...................................................................................................................................... 13 4.5 Protected, Rare and Notable Species ........................................................................................ 18 4.5.1 Flora and Fauna – Data Search Records ..................................................................................................................... 19 4.6 Flora and Fauna – Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey ............................................................... 21 4.6.1 Notable Flora .............................................................................................................................................................. 21 4.6.2 Mammals .................................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.7 Predicted Trends ....................................................................................................................... 23 4.8 Summary of Important Ecological Features .............................................................................. 23 POTENTIAL ECOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS TO DEVELOPMENT ............................................. 25 . Jacobs UK Limited Holyoakes Field First School – Ecological Appraisal 404.04946.00016: Filename: 190207_404.04946.00016 HolyoakesFieldFirstSchool_EA_JH_MPM_vf1 v1 February 2019 5.1.1 Designated Sites ......................................................................................................................................................... 25 5.1.2 Habitats ....................................................................................................................................................................... 25 5.1.3 Invasive Non-Native Plant Species .............................................................................................................................. 25 5.1.4 Protected and Other Notable Species ........................................................................................................................ 25 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT ......................................... 27 6.1 Recommendations for Avoidance of Impact ............................................................................ 27 6.1.1 Positioning of the Development Footprint ................................................................................................................. 27 6.1.2 Timing of Site Clearance ............................................................................................................................................. 27 6.2 Recommendations for Mitigation of Potential Impact ............................................................. 28 6.3 Recommendations for Compensation ...................................................................................... 28 6.4 Recommendations for Ecological and Biodiversity Enhancement ........................................... 28 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................. 30 DOCUMENT REFERENCES DRAWINGS DRAWING 1: ECOLOGICAL SURVEY PLAN DRAWING 2: DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS APPENDICES Appendix 01: WBRC Data . Introduction In January 2019, Jacobs UK Limited commissioned SLR Consulting Limited (SLR) to undertake an Ecological Appraisal (EA) of the proposed new Holyoakes Field First School site, off Cookridge Close, Redditch, B97 6GU. Previous ecological appraisal of the site was undertaken in March 2016 on behalf of Worcestershire County Council and this report has been produced to renew the now out-of-date record. 1.1 Details of Proposed Development The proposed development comprises the relocation and expansion of the existing Holyoakes Field First School. The current school accommodates 48 pupils in facilities that are considered to be sub-optimal and deteriorating. The proposed new school would be purpose built and able to accommodate 60 pupils plus a 26 place nursery,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tardebigge CE First School
    Tardebigge Church of England (Voluntary Aided) First School Policy for Admissions from September 2021 Church Lane, Tardebigge, near Bromsgrove, Worcestershire B60 3AH A rainbow of opportunity Tel: 01527-872886 Fax: 01527-578446 Email: [email protected] Website: www.tardebigge.worcs.sch.uk It is the Governors' legal responsibility to produce the Admissions Policy and to allocate places at Tardebigge School. They always adhere strictly, and without favour, to the policy when considering an application and all preferences are treated equally. Applicants are advised to read all the additional information below before completing an application form. If you are unclear about any aspects of the admissions procedure, please contact the Head Teacher or School Office without delay. In accordance with legislation, a child with an Education Health Care Plan will be offered a place if Tardebigge School is named in the plan. When the number of applications exceeds the Published Admission Number (PAN) of 30, places will be allocated using the following criteria in the following order. In the event of over subscription within any of the criterion the subsequent criteria will be applied: (a) Looked After Children and Previously Looked After Children. A looked after child is a child who is in the care of a Local Authority in England or being provided with accommodation by a local authority in England under the definition of the Children Act 1989. A previously looked after child is a child who was looked after but immediately after being looked after become subject to an adoption, a child arrangements order or special guardianship order.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report
    2 3 Contents 1. Introduction 16 1.1 Overview 16 1.2 Purpose of this Scoping Report 16 1.3 The Bromsgrove District Plan – An Overview 17 Requirement to Prepare a Local Plan 17 Scope and Content of the Bromsgrove District Plan 17 Preparation of the District Plan 18 1.4 Sustainability Appraisal 19 The Requirement for Sustainability Appraisal 19 Stages in the Sustainability Appraisal Process 20 1.5 Habitats Regulations Assessment 21 1.6 Scoping Report Structure 22 1.7 What are the Next Steps in the SA process? 23 2. Review of Plans and Programmes 24 2.1 Introduction 24 2.2 Review of Plans and Programmes 24 2.3 Key Messages 27 3. Baseline Analysis 30 3.1 Introduction 30 3.2 Bromsgrove District: An Overview 30 3.3 Soils and Land Use, Water Resources and Water Quality 31 Soils and Land Use 31 Water Resources 33 Water Quality 33 Likely Evolution of the Baseline without the District Plan 35 Key Sustainability Issues 35 3.4 Air Quality, Waste, Pollution and Energy, Flood Risk and Climate Change 36 Air Quality 36 Waste, Pollution and Energy 39 Flood Risk 43 Climate Change 45 Likely Evolution of the Baseline without the District Plan 48 Key Sustainability Issues 49 3.5 Biodiversity, Geodiversity and Green Infrastructure 49 Biodiversity 49 Geodiversity 52 Green Infrastructure 52 Likely Evolution of the Baseline without the District Plan 53 Key Sustainability Issues 54 3.6 Landscape, Townscape and the Historic Environment 54 Landscape and Townscape 54 Townscape 56 Cultural Heritage 56 Likely Evolution of the Baseline without the District Plan 58 Key
    [Show full text]
  • Lime Kilns in Worcestershire
    Lime Kilns in Worcestershire Nils Wilkes Acknowledgements I first began this project in September 2012 having noticed a number of limekilns annotated on the Ordnance Survey County Series First Edition maps whilst carrying out another project for the Historic Environment Record department (HER). That there had been limekilns right across Worcestershire was not something I was aware of, particularly as the county is not regarded to be a limestone region. When I came to look for books or documents relating specifically to limeburning in Worcestershire, there were none, and this intrigued me. So, in short, this document is the result of my endeavours to gather together both documentary and physical evidence of a long forgotten industry in Worcestershire. In the course of this research I have received the help of many kind people. Firstly I wish to thank staff at the Historic Environmental Record department of the Archive and Archaeological Service for their patience and assistance in helping me develop the Limekiln Database, in particular Emma Hancox, Maggi Noke and Olly Russell. I am extremely grateful to Francesca Llewellyn for her information on Stourport and Astley; Simon Wilkinson for notes on Upton-upon-Severn; Gordon Sawyer for his enthusiasm in locating sites in Strensham; David Viner (Canal and Rivers Trust) in accessing records at Ellesmere Port; Bill Lambert (Worcester and Birmingham Canal Trust) for involving me with the Tardebigge Limekilns Project; Pat Hughes for her knowledge of the lime trade in Worcester and Valerie Goodbury
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Monitoring Report December 2016 Chapter One: Introduction
    Bromsgrove Bromsgrove District Council District Council Planning and Regeneration www.bromsgrove.gov.uk Authority Monitoring Report December 2016 Chapter One: Introduction 1.1 Background The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act in September 2004 emphasised that review and monitoring were key aspects of the ‘plan, monitor and manage’ approach to the planning system. They were seen as crucial to the successful delivery of the spatial vision and objectives of the Local Development Framework (LDF). The process of reviewing and monitoring enabled a comprehensive evidence base to be built against which Local Development Document policies and implementation can be assessed. It also enabled trends to be identified to which the Council could respond by producing Development Plan Documents (DPDs) or Supplementary Plan Documents (SPDs). These documents, in turn, would form part of the portfolio of Local Development Documents contained within the LDF. There was a change to a Coalition Government in May 2010, and following a letter to Chief Planning Officers dated 30th March 2011, the Secretary of State withdrew guidance on local plan monitoring stating it is “a matter for each council to decide what to include in their monitoring reports”. Core output indicators were removed, as well as the 2005 Good Practice Guide. It was intended that this was a step towards a more flexible approach to local plan monitoring as set out in the new local planning regulations. Councils now have much greater freedom to decide what to include in their monitoring reports while ensuring that they are prepared in accordance with relevant UK and EU legislation. In response to these changes, this report was reduced in size as part of the 2011 Annual Monitoring Report in order to focus on the key issues relevant to planning in Bromsgrove District.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Resources in the Archive Self Service Area
    Worcestershire Archive and Archaeology Service www.worcestershire.gov.uk/waas Guide to Resources in the Archive Self Service Area 1 Contents 1. Introduction to the resources in the Self Service Area .............................................................. 3 2. Table of Resources ........................................................................................................................ 4 3. 'See Under' List ............................................................................................................................. 23 4. Glossary of Terms ........................................................................................................................ 33 2 1. Introduction to the resources in the Self Service Area The following is a guide to the types of records we hold and the areas we may cover within the Self Service Area of the Worcestershire Archive and Archaeology Service. The Self Service Area has the same opening hours as the Hive: 8.30am to 10pm 7 days a week. You are welcome to browse and use these resources during these times, and an additional guide called 'Guide to the Self Service Archive Area' has been developed to help. This is available in the area or on our website free of charge, but if you would like to purchase your own copy of our guides please speak to a member of staff or see our website for our current contact details. If you feel you would like support to use the area you can book on to one of our workshops 'First Steps in Family History' or 'First Steps in Local History'. For more information on these sessions, and others that we hold, please pick up a leaflet or see our Events Guide at www.worcestershire.gov.uk/waas. About the Guide This guide is aimed as a very general overview and is not intended to be an exhaustive list of resources.
    [Show full text]
  • CDX1.1 Housing Growth Development Study
    Hagley Romsley Clent Bromsgrove District Council Hollywood and Redditch Borough Council Belbroughton Rubery Planning Wythall Cofton Hackett Hopwood Marlbrook Bournheath Catshill Barnt Green Dodford Lickey End Alvechurch Blackwell Rowney Green Bromsgrove Finstall Beoley Tardebigge Stoke Heath Church Hill Batchley Winyates Stoke Prior Redditch Matchborough Washford Callow Hill Crabbs Cross Astwood Bank Feckenham © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Bromsgrove District Council 100023519 (2013) Housing Growth Development Study January 2013 Bromsgrove Prepared jointly and approved by District Council Bromsgrove District Council and Redditch Borough Council www.bromsgrove.gov.uk Housing Growth Development Study January 2013 Contents Page Number Introduction 2 1. Background 3 2. Strategic Objectives 7 3. Methodology 8 4. Area Assessment Principles 14 5. Broad Area Appraisal 15 6. Focused Area Appraisal 60 7. Sustainability Appraisal (SA) Summary 211 8. Scenarios for alternative growth locations 214 9. Delivery and Phasing 221 10. Overall Conclusions 223 Appendix I - Draft Policy 226 Appendix II - Boundaries and photo points 227 Appendix III - Glossary 235 Appendix IV - Reference List 239 1 Bromsgrove District Council and Redditch Borough Council Planning Housing Growth Development Study January 2013 Redditch Borough, to sustainably accommodate Introduction this additional housing growth. This is a non-technical Bromsgrove District Council and Redditch Borough study that has been written to explain how a location Council jointly consulted on cross boundary growth has been identified by officers of both authorities to options in 2010. Since then changes to the meet this cross-boundary growth. For this reason, planning system have meant that both Councils technical information is not included but is cross- need to work together to find a solution to meet referenced or results have been summarised in the the growth needs of Redditch which cannot all be relevant paragraphs.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Tax Handlist Version 1
    Tax Records On Microfilm At The Hive Worcestershire Archive and Archaeology Service 2012 1 Contents Land Tax Records………………..1 Hearth Tax Records……………..34 Poll Tax Records………………...98 2 Land Tax Returns 1781-1832 On Microfilm 3 Contents Introduction to Land Tax Returns 5 How to use this handlist 6 Section 1: By date 7-14 Section 2: By hundred 15-31 Blakenhurst 16 - 17 Doddingtree 18 - 19 Lower Halfshire 20 - 21 Upper Halfshire 22 - 23 Middle and Lower Oswaldslow 24 - 25 East Oswaldslow 26 - 27 Lower Pershore 28 - 29 Upper Pershore 30 - 31 4 Introduction to Land Tax Returns Land Tax Assessment was established in 1692 and was levied on land with an annual value of more than 20 shillings. It was first collected in 1693 and continued to be collected until 1963. Before 1780 Land Tax Assessments are rare but from then until 1832 duplicates of the Land Assessments had to be lodged with the Clerk of the Peace and are to be found in County Quarter Sessions records. In 1798 the tax was fixed at 4 shillings in the pound and this was made as a permanent charge on the land. The landowners were given the choice of paying 15 years of tax in a lump sum and by 1815 one third of landowners had taken this option. Worcestershire Land Tax Returns can give: Rental value of the owner’s property. Names of owners and copyholders. Names of occupiers. Names or description of property or estate. The amounts of tax levied. Those owners exonerated from paying the tax annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2017, West Midlands
    West Midlands Register 2017 HERITAGE AT RISK 2017 / WEST MIDLANDS Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Herefordshire, County of (UA) 1 Shropshire (UA) 13 Staffordshire 28 East Staffordshire 28 Lichfield 29 Newcastle-under-Lyme 30 Peak District (NP) 31 South Staffordshire 31 Stafford 32 Staffordshire Moorlands 33 Tamworth 35 Stoke-on-Trent, City of (UA) 35 Telford and Wrekin (UA) 38 Warwickshire 39 North Warwickshire 39 Nuneaton and Bedworth 42 Rugby 42 Stratford-on-Avon 44 Warwick 47 West Midlands 50 Birmingham 50 Coventry 54 Dudley 57 Sandwell 59 Walsall 60 Wolverhampton, City of 61 Worcestershire 63 Bromsgrove 63 Malvern Hills 64 Redditch 67 Worcester 67 Wychavon 68 Wyre Forest 71 II West Midlands Summary 2017 ur West Midlands Heritage at Risk team continues to work hard to reduce the number of heritage assets on the Register. This year the figure has been brought O down to 416, which is 7.8% of the national total of 5,290. While we work to decrease the overall numbers we do, unfortunately, have to add individual sites each year and recognise the challenge posed by a number of long-standing cases. We look to identify opportunities to focus resources on these tough cases. This year we have grant-aided some £1.5m of conservation repairs, Management Agreements and capacity building, covering a wide range of sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Bromsgrove District Plan Review Issues and Options
    Bromsgrove District Council Bromsgrove District Plan Review Issues and Options Sustainability Appraisal Report Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited – August 2018 2 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited Report for Copyright and non-disclosure notice Alison Grimmett The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright Principal Planning Officer owned by Wood (© Wood Environment & Infrastructure Bromsgrove District Council Solutions UK Limited 2018) save to the extent that copyright Town Hall has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by Walter Stranz Square Wood under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright Redditch in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior Worcestershire written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose B98 8AH indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of Wood. Disclosure of that information may Main contributors constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may Ryan Llewellyn otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party Sean Nicholson who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any Robert Deanwood event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Pete Davis Third party disclaimer Issued by Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by Wood at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2018, West Midlands
    West Midlands Register 2018 HERITAGE AT RISK 2018 / WEST MIDLANDS Contents The Register III Wyre Forest 71 Content and criteria III Criteria for inclusion on the Register V Reducing the risks VII Key statistics XI Publications and guidance XII Key to the entries XIV Entries on the Register by local planning XVI authority Herefordshire, County of (UA) 1 Shropshire (UA) 12 Staffordshire 28 East Staffordshire 28 Lichfield 29 Newcastle-under-Lyme 30 Peak District (NP) 31 South Staffordshire 32 Stafford 32 Staffordshire Moorlands 33 Tamworth 35 Stoke-on-Trent, City of (UA) 35 Telford and Wrekin (UA) 37 Warwickshire 39 North Warwickshire 39 Nuneaton and Bedworth 42 Rugby 43 Stratford-on-Avon 44 Warwick 48 West Midlands 51 Birmingham 51 Coventry 56 Dudley 58 West Midlands / Worcestershire 59 Dudley / Bromsgrove 59 West Midlands 60 Sandwell 60 Walsall 60 Wolverhampton, City of 62 Worcestershire 64 Bromsgrove 64 Malvern Hills 65 Redditch 67 Worcester 67 Wychavon 68 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2018 / WEST MIDLANDS LISTED BUILDINGS THE REGISTER Listing is the most commonly encountered type of statutory protection of heritage assets. A listed building Content and criteria (or structure) is one that has been granted protection as being of special architectural or historic interest. The LISTING older and rarer a building is, the more likely it is to be listed. Buildings less than 30 years old are listed only if Definition they are of very high quality and under threat. Listing is All the historic environment matters but there are mandatory: if special interest is believed to be present, some elements which warrant extra protection through then the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and the planning system.
    [Show full text]
  • RLP Design 2
    Borough of Redditch Local Plan No.4 ADOPTED JANUARY 2017 www.redditchbc.gov.uk/localplan 1 Contents Contents Introduction 3 Local Challenges 4 Duty to Cooperate 5 What has influenced this Local Plan? 6 More information 6 Local Portrait 7 Vision 13 Objectives 15 Policy 1 Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development 16 Key Diagram 17 Sustainable Places to Live which Meet our Needs 18 Policy 2 Settlement Hierarchy 19 Policy 3 Development Strategy 21 Policy 4 Housing Provision 22 Policy 5 Effective and Efficient Use of Land 23 Policy 6 Affordable Housing 25 Policy 7 Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople 27 Policy 8 Green Belt 28 Policy 9 Open Countryside 29 Policy 10 Rural Workers Dwellings 30 Creating and Sustaining a Green Environment 32 Policy 11 Green Infrastructure 33 Policy 12 Open Space Provision 34 Policy 13 Primarily Open Space 36 Policy 14 Protection of Incidental Open Space 38 Policy 15 Climate Change 39 Policy 16 Natural Environment 41 Policy 17 Flood Risk Management 43 Policy 18 Sustainable Water Management 46 Policy 19 Sustainable Travel and Accessibility 48 Policy 20 Transport Requirements for New Development 51 Policy 21 Alexandra Hospital Public Transport Interchange 53 Policy 22 Road Hierarchy 54 Creating a Borough where Businesses can Thrive 56 Policy 23 Employment Land Provision 57 Policy 24 Development within Primarily Employment Areas 59 Policy 25 Development outside of Primarily Employment Areas 61 Policy 26 Office Development 62 Policy 27 Rural Economic Development 64 Policy 28 Supporting Education, Training
    [Show full text]
  • Redditch Borough Council Planning Policy Comments for Brockhill East, Weights Lane, Redditch Planning Application (19/00976/HYB)
    Redditch Borough Council Planning Policy comments for Brockhill East, Weights Lane, Redditch Planning Application (19/00976/HYB) 1. Background 1.1 Bromsgrove District Council (BDC) has received a Planning Application for the development Brockhill East site (Application number 19/00976/HYB). The Hybrid Application is for up to 960 dwellings consisting of a full application for 128 dwellings accessed off Weights Lane and an outline application for (with all matters reserved with the exception of access) for the construction of the remaining dwellings, with access points off Cookridge Close, Hawling Street and Weights Lane. The application also seeks outline approval for a new District Centre, new play facilities, new highway network and public open space. For information an identical application (19/00977/HYB) has been submitted to Redditch Borough Council as this application crosses Bromsgrove and Redditch administrative boundaries, the Redditch portion of the application will be going to Redditch Planning Committee for determination in due course. 1.2 This response has been prepared as Redditch Borough Council (RBC) is a consultee to the Planning Application received by BDC. The purpose of these comments is not to consider the merits of the application or provide a determination of that application. It is to provide BDC with a view from RBC on the Application being determined by them for the portion of development in their administrative area. 2. The Site 2.1 The site is located to the north of Redditch Town, adjacent to the existing Brockhill area. It is part the allocated Brockhill Development Site, the constructed Phase 1 portion of the site lies to the south and Phase 2 (currently being constructed) which lies between Phase 1 and the railway line, again to the south of this application site (Phase 3).
    [Show full text]