21.02 MUNICIPAL PROFILE 21.02-1 Profile of Pyrenees Shire Pyrenees

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

21.02 MUNICIPAL PROFILE 21.02-1 Profile of Pyrenees Shire Pyrenees PYRENEES PLANNING SCHEME 21.02 MUNICIPAL PROFILE 01/09/2016 C39 21.02-1 Profile of Pyrenees Shire 19/01/2006 VC37 Pyrenees Shire was created in September 1994 by the amalgamation of the Shires of Avoca, Lexton and Ripon. It takes its name from the Pyrenees Range - a “fold range” which is almost entirely located within its municipal borders. 21.02-2 Regional Context 19/01/2006 VC37 Pyrenees Shire is located in central Victoria between the regional centres of Ballarat and Ararat. It shares common boundaries with the City of Ballarat and Shire of Hepburn to the east, Golden Plains Shire to the south-east, Corangamite and Moyne Shires to the south, Rural City of Ararat to the west, Northern Grampians Shire to the north-west and Central Goldfields Shire to the north-east. The Shire covers an area of 3457 square kilometres, extending approximately 90 kilometres in a north-south direction and 40 kilometres in an east-west direction. Despite its size, the Shire has only a small population, the majority of which reside in the towns of Beaufort and Avoca. There are a number of smaller townships and settlements located throughout the Shire however, which provide local services and facilities to surrounding rural areas and provide important foci for community activities and social interaction. The Western, Sunraysia and Pyrenees Highways pass through the Shire and provide it with good connections to the surrounding region and to Melbourne. However the good external road connections combined with the small population has resulted in residents relying to some extent on the nearby regional centres and large towns for employment and to meet their needs for retail services, community services and entertainment. The spatial configuration of the Shire and its key features and items of physical infrastructure are shown on the Physical Framework Plan (refer Figure 1). 21.02-3 Physiography 19/01/2006 VC37 The physiography of the Shire changes markedly over its length. In the northern portion of the Shire, the Pyrenees Range is the dominating feature. This comprises steeply rising hills and ridges of predominantly uplifted sediments, the high point of which is Mount Avoca (760m) to the south-east of Landsborough. To the east of the Pyrenees Range the land takes the form of a highland plateau and includes the extensive alluvial flood-plain of the Avoca River. The Great Dividing Range passes east-west through the central portion of the Shire. This comprises steep ridges and hills at its western end (which contains the high points of Mt Cole, Mt Lonarch and Ben Major). The Great Divide forms the watershed between two drainage systems. In this regard, the land to the north drains to the Goulburn-Murray River system via the Avoca and Wimmera Rivers and associated tributaries. The land to the south of the Divide drains to the Hopkins River system, via Mt Emu Creek (the major tributary of the Hopkins River) and its tributaries including Baillies Creek, the un-named creeks in the Snake Valley area, and the Trawalla/Fiery/Middle Creek systems north of Beaufort. The rivers and streams in the Shire are relied upon extensively for urban water supply and/or agriculture. The southern portion of the Shire is characterised by basaltic plains, formed when a succession of volcanic eruptions covered the pre-existing plains with basalt sheets. These plains contain a number of natural lakes and swamps where volcanic flows and pyroclastic material have closed off catchment outlets or created small catchments with internal drainage such as Lake Goldsmith. The remnants of volcanoes and other eruption points, MUNICIPAL STRATEGIC STATEMENT - CLAUSE 21.02 PAGE 1 OF 13 PYRENEES PLANNING SCHEME being visible over the plains for many kilometres, provide landscape interest and orientation points for people. The physiographic variations in the Shire result in climate variations from north to south, with significant implications in terms of agricultural activities. In this regard, the areas in the northern portion of the Shire experience hot, dry summers and cool winters. Rainfall in the northern part of the Shire varies around 650mm per year, the majority in the April- October period. The climate in the southern part of the Shire by contrast is characterised by more temperate summers and higher rainfalls (usually in excess of 750mm) which also predominantly occur in the April-October period. 21.02-4 Population 19/01/2006 VC37 The Shire has an estimated resident population (1996) of 6578. Settlement in the Shire is based around historic rural service centres and former gold mining areas. In this regard, the majority of the Shire’s population resides in the towns of Beaufort and Avoca and in smaller townships including Amphitheatre, Landsborough, Lexton, Moonambel, Snake Valley and Waubra. In addition, there are significant rural- residential communities around the township of Snake Valley in the south-east part of the Shire, and in areas of small lot subdivision in rural areas (eg the areas to the north of Beaufort and extending to Raglan and Trawalla). Table 1 shows the demographic composition of the Shire in 1986, 1991 and 1996. The table reveals that the Shire’s population decreased by less than 3% over the period 1986 to 1996 and available demographic indicators suggest that population growth has been relatively static since 1991. Table 1: Demographic Composition 1986, 1991 and 1996 Age No 1986 % RegVic% No 1991 % RegVic No 1996 % RegVic Group % % 0-4 560 8.3 8.1 483 6.9 8.1 442 6.7 7.4 5-17 1590 23.7 22.8 1597 22.9 21.2 1329 20.2 20.7 18-24 488 7.3 10.2 487 7.0 9.8 380 5.8 8.7 25-34 936 13.9 15.4 871 12.5 15.0 714 10.9 13.5 35-49 1227 18.2 18.3 1522 21.8 20.4 1517 23.1 22.3 50-59 748 11.1 9.3 748 10.7 9.0 854 13.0 10.0 60-69 664 9.9 8.3 706 10.1 8.5 710 10.8 8.2 70-84 460 6.8 6.7 520 7.4 7.0 555 8.4 8.0 85 and 49 0.7 0.9 51 0.7 1.0 77 1.2 1.3 over Total 6722 100.0 100.0 6985 100.0 100.0 6578 100.0 100.0 Source: Department of Infrastructure, 1997 Victoria in Fact, Interim report. An Economic Profile and Prospects1 report prepared for the Shire in 1997 made the following observations about the Shire’s population for the 1981-1991 period: . The 30-39 and 40-49 age groups increased over the periods 1981-86 and 1986-91 and were consistent with both Non-Metropolitan Melbourne and State of Victoria levels. 1.Noelker, Neil (1997) Economic Profile and Prospects for the Pyrenees Shire Council. MUNICIPAL STRATEGIC STATEMENT - CLAUSE 21.02 PAGE 2 OF 13 PYRENEES PLANNING SCHEME This is important in terms of population growth given that people in these age groups are in the prime of their working lives. The 20-29 age group declined over the same periods. In addition the proportion of people in this age group (1991) was well below both Non-Metropolitan Victoria and State of Victoria. Speculation as to the reasons for this include lack of employment opportunity, lack of tertiary educational opportunity (although it is noted that tertiary education opportunities are available in the nearby regional centres) and the attraction of metropolitan life. The population was more mobile than the average for rural municipalities. In terms of household income, 51% of households were in the lower annual household income bracket compared to Non-Metropolitan Victoria (41.9%) and Victoria (34%). This would appear to be due to the state of the agricultural sector and the limited number of executive jobs in the municipality. The population was almost exclusively comprised of people from English speaking backgrounds. Home ownership in the Shire (at 79%) was much higher than non-metropolitan Melbourne (71.4%) or Victoria as-a-whole (70.5%). This indicates a relatively stable population. 21.02-5 Economy 19/01/2006 VC37 The economy of the Pyrenees Shire is heavily dependent upon primary industry, as indicated by the following Table (Table 2 Employment by Industry 1996). This shows that those employed in agriculture and forestry accounted for approximately one third of the 1996 labour force of 2330 persons. This partly accounts for the fact that the proportion of households in the Shire with income in the lower annual income bracket was substantially higher than for Victoria as a whole (ie due to the depressed state of agriculture). Table 2: Employment by Industry 1996 Industry Number of Numbers employed as a percentage of Persons total labour force Agriculture Forestry 722 31.0 Mining 27 1.3 Manufacturing 333 14.3 Electricity,Gas,Water 12 0.5 Construction 96 4.1 Wholesale Trade 85 3.6 Retail Trade 214 9.2 Accommodation,Cafes,Restaurants 80 3.4 Transport, Storage 71 3.0 Communication 28 1.2 Finance,Insurance 27 1.2 Property, Business 54 2.3 GovtAdministration,Defence 91 3.9 Education 120 5.2 Health, Community Services 173 7.4 Culture, Recreation 26 1.1 MUNICIPAL STRATEGIC STATEMENT - CLAUSE 21.02 PAGE 3 OF 13 PYRENEES PLANNING SCHEME Industry Number of Numbers employed as a percentage of Persons total labour force Personal, Other Services 77 3.3 Non Classifiable, Non Stated 94 4.0 TOTAL 2330 100.0 Source: ABS1996Census. In the Pyrenees Ranges area, viticulture is becoming a growth industry and has been identified in the Economic Profile and Prospects report as the foundation for a new and major industry for the region with significant tourism spin-offs.
Recommended publications
  • Municipal Emergency Management Plan
    MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN Document No: SP006 - 2017 Review Date: June 2017 Municipal Emergency Last Reviewed: February 2016 Management Plan Next Audit Due: July 2020 Revision No: 1.1 Responsible Officer: Risk, Emergency Management and Local Laws Coordinator th Approved By: Council (27 June 2017) Related Documents: FOREWORD Emergencies are unpredictable in terms of their occurrence and effects, and can require a response for which normal local resources may be inadequate. They can have a wide range of effects and impacts on the human and physical environment, and can generate complex needs in dealing with them. The term “Emergency” has been defined in the Emergency Management Act 2013 (S.3) means an emergency due to the actual or imminent occurrence of an event which in any way endangers or threatens to endanger the safety or health of any person in Victoria or which destroys or damages, or threatens to destroy or damage, any property in Victoria or endangers or threatens to endanger the environment or an element of the environment in Victoria, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing- • An earthquake, flood, windstorm or other natural event; and • A fire; and • An explosion; and • A road accident or any other accident; and • A plague or an epidemic or contamination; and • A warlike act or act of terrorism, whether directed at Victoria or a part of Victoria or at any other State or Territory of the Commonwealth; and • A hijack, siege or riot; and • A disruption to an essential service." The economic and social effects of emergencies including loss of life, destruction of property, and dislocation of communities, are inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Spring Parlynet Weekly Book 2 2000
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL FIFTY-FOURTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Book 2 5 and 6 September 2000 Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au\downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor His Excellency the Honourable Sir JAMES AUGUSTINE GOBBO, AC The Lieutenant-Governor Professor ADRIENNE E. CLARKE, AO The Ministry Premier and Minister for Multicultural Affairs ....................... The Hon. S. P. Bracks, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for Health and Minister for Planning......... The Hon. J. W. Thwaites, MP Minister for Industrial Relations and Minister assisting the Minister for Workcover..................... The Hon. M. M. Gould, MLC Minister for Transport............................................ The Hon. P. Batchelor, MP Minister for Energy and Resources, Minister for Ports and Minister assisting the Minister for State and Regional Development. The Hon. C. C. Broad, MLC Minister for State and Regional Development and Treasurer............ The Hon. J. M. Brumby, MP Minister for Local Government, Minister for Workcover and Minister assisting the Minister for Transport regarding Roads........ The Hon. R. G. Cameron, MP Minister for Community Services.................................. The Hon. C. M. Campbell, MP Minister for Education and Minister for the Arts...................... The Hon. M. E. Delahunty, MP Minister for Environment and Conservation and Minister for Women’s Affairs................................... The Hon. S. M. Garbutt, MP Minister for Police and Emergency Services and Minister for Corrections........................................ The Hon. A. Haermeyer, MP Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs............ The Hon. K. G. Hamilton, MP Attorney-General, Minister for Manufacturing Industry and Minister for Racing............................................ The Hon. R. J. Hulls, MP Minister for Post Compulsory Education, Training and Employment and Minister for Finance..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020
    Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020 Version: 1.1 Date approved: 22 December 2015 Reviewed: 15 January 2019 Responsible Department: Planning Related policies: Nil 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Definitions ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 5 4 Scope .................................................................................................................... 5 5 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 5 6 Gambling and EGMs in the City of Casey ........................................................... 6 7 City of Casey Position on Electronic Gaming Machines ................................... 7 7.1 Advocacy & Partnerships ....................................................................................... 7 7.2 Local Economy ....................................................................................................... 8 7.3 Consultation & Information Provision ...................................................................... 9 7.4 Community Wellbeing ............................................................................................ 9 7.5 Planning Assessment ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 21.08 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT the Rural City of Ararat's
    ARARAT PLANNING SCHEME 21.08 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2004/2006 C12 The Rural City of Ararat’s economy has traditionally been based on prosperous primary production, its high quality merino wool and employment generated from various government departments and functions. However, the Rural City of Ararat’s economy has been subject to substantial change. Agriculture is diversifying, government departments and functions have been centralised and rationalised, tourism and wine production are becoming more important as components of the local economy, technology is still having an impact on the workforce and there is increasing awareness of environmental degradation based on unsustainable land and water uses. Tourism, industrial development, the diversification of the agricultural products and new enterprises based on value-adding closer to the source of the product are ways of expanding and diversifying the economic base of the municipality, to maximise long term economic and social benefits. The strategic location of the Rural City of Ararat, with direct road and rail links to major population centres and ports in Victoria and South Australia in particular, is of great benefit to the local economy through the facilitation of tourism and trade. Until recently Ararat was very much a government town comprising various government agencies and departments including the railways, mental health, State Electricity Commission and Telstra, to name a few. The rationalisation of a number of these government agencies has resulted in the closure of the majority. All industries involved with agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, electricity, gas and water, construction transport and storage, wholesale and retail trade and public administration and defence, recreation, personal and other service finance, property and business services, community services and communication have all experienced very significant downturns in employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Gambling Industries 3 Consumption of Gambling
    Australia’s Gambling Inquiry Report Industries Volume 3: Appendices Report No. 10 26 November 1999 Contents of Volume 3 Appendices A Participation and public consultation B Participation in gambling: data tables C Estimating consumer surplus D The sensitivity of the demand for gambling to price changes E Gambling in indigenous communities F National Gambling Survey G Survey of Clients of Counselling Agencies H Problem gambling and crime I Regional data analysis J Measuring costs K Recent US estimates of the costs of problem gambling L Survey of Counselling Services M Gambling taxes N Gaming machines: some international comparisons O Displacement of illegal gambling? P Spending by problem gamblers Q Who are the problem gamblers? R Bankruptcy and gambling S State and territory gambling data T Divorce and separations U How gaming machines work V Use of the SOGS in Australian gambling surveys References III Contents of other volumes Volume 1 Terms of reference Key findings Summary of the report Part A Introduction 1 The inquiry Part B The gambling industries 2 An overview of Australia's gambling industries 3 Consumption of gambling Part C Impacts 4 Impacts of gambling: a framework for assessment 5 Assessing the benefits 6 What is problem gambling? 7 The impacts of problem gambling 8 The link between accessibility and problems 9 Quantifying the costs of problem gambling 10 Broader community impacts 11 Gauging the net impacts Volume 2 Part D The policy environment 12 Gambling policy: overview and assessment framework 13 Regulatory arrangements for major forms of gambling 14 Are constraints on competition justified? 15 Regulating access 16 Consumer protection 17 Help for people affected by problem gambling 18 Policy for new technologies 19 The taxation of gambling 20 Earmarking 21 Mutuality 22 Regulatory processes and institutions 23 Information issues IV V A Participation and public consultation The Commission received the terms of reference for this inquiry on 26 August 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Services Property Levy Manual of Operating Procedures for Local Government 2014-15 Contents
    Fire Services Property Levy Manual of Operating Procedures for Local Government 2014-15 Contents 6 1. Purpose 9 5.2.4 Caravan parks 6 1.1 Audience 9 5.2.5 Common property 6 1.2 Overview 9 5.2.6 Shared Equity/Ownership 6 1.3 Legislation Agreements – Director of Housing 6 1.3.1 Relevant Acts 9 5.3 Special rules for assessing and apportioning the levy in certain 6 1.3.2 Amending Act circumstances 6 1.4 Ministerial guidelines 9 5.3.1 Applying the levy to an 6 1.5 Review arrangements undertaking extending across a 6 1.6 Making best use of the manual municipal boundary 6 1.7 Points of Contact 10 5.3.2 Councils unaware that an undertaking extends across a municipal boundary 7 2. Background 10 5.3.3 Equal sized portions of cross 7 3. Who is liable for the levy municipal boundary land 7 3.1 Who is liable? 10 5.3.4 Applying the levy where two or more parcels of land owned by different people are treated as a 8 4. Owner single parcel of land for valuation 8 4.1 Who is an owner? purposes 8 4.1.1 Definition of an owner 10 5.3.5 Applying the levy to 8 4.2 Joint and several liability land crossing the Country Fire Authority (CFA) / Metropolitan 8 4.3 Who isn’t an owner? Fire Brigade (MFB) border 8 5. Land 11 5.3.6 Applying the levy where land ceases or becomes leviable during 8 5.1 What is leviable? the levy year 8 5.1.1 Property that is subject to the 11 5.4 Council levy 11 5.4.1 Council land 8 5.2 Determining a parcel of leviable land 11 5.4.2 Specific council public benefit land (s.20) 8 5.2.1 Multiple parcels of contiguous land occupied by the same
    [Show full text]
  • 21.01 Pyrenees Shire Key Influences & Issues 21.01-1
    PYRENEES PLANNING SCHEME 21.01 PYRENEES SHIRE KEY INFLUENCES & ISSUES 15/12/2016 C41 21.01-1 Snapshot of Pyrenees Shire 15/12/2016 C41 Pyrenees Shire is located in central Victoria between the regional centres of Ballarat and Ararat. It shares common boundaries with the City of Ballarat and Shire of Hepburn to the east, Golden Plains Shire to the south-east, Corangamite and Moyne Shires to the south, Rural City of Ararat to the west, Northern Grampians Shire to the north-west and Central Goldfields Shire to the north-east. Pyrenees Shire was created in September 1994 by the amalgamation of the Shires of Avoca, Lexton and Ripon. It takes its name from the Pyrenees Range, a “fold range” which is almost entirely located within its municipal borders. The Shire covers an area of 3457 square kilometres, extending approximately 90 kilometres in a north-south direction and 40 kilometres in an east-west direction. Despite its size, the Shire has only a small population of 6867 (Victoria in Future 2016), the majority of which reside in the towns of Beaufort and Avoca. There are a number of smaller townships and settlements located throughout the Shire however, which provide local services and facilities to surrounding rural areas and provide important foci for community activities and social interaction. The Shire is projected to have a population of 7,419 by 2031 (Victoria in Future 2016). The Western, Sunraysia and Pyrenees Highways pass through the Shire and provide it with good connections to the surrounding region and to Melbourne. However the good external road connections combined with the small population has resulted in residents relying to some extent on the nearby regional centres and large towns for employment and to meet their needs for retail services, community services and entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • 21.02 MUNICIPAL PROFILE 21.02-1 Profile of Pyrenees Shire
    092%.%%3À0,!..).'À3#(%-% LOCAL PROVISION 21.02 MUNICIPAL PROFILE 21.02-1 Profile of Pyrenees Shire Pyrenees Shire was created in September 1994 by the amalgamation of the Shires of Avoca, Lexton and Ripon. It takes its name from the Pyrenees Range - a “fold range” which is almost entirely located within its municipal borders. 21.02-2 Regional Context Pyrenees Shire is located in central Victoria between the regional centres of Ballarat and Ararat. It shares common boundaries with the City of Ballarat and Shire of Hepburn to the east, Golden Plains Shire to the south-east, Corangamite and Moyne Shires to the south, Rural City of Ararat to the west, Northern Grampians Shire to the north-west and Central Goldfields Shire to the north-east. The Shire covers an area of 3457 square kilometres, extending approximately 90 kilometres in a north- south direction and 40 kilometres in an east-west direction. Despite its size, the Shire has only a small population, the majority of which reside in the towns of Beaufort and Avoca. There are a number of smaller townships and settlements located throughout the Shire however, which provide local services and facilities to surrounding rural areas and provide important foci for community activities and social interaction. The Western, Sunraysia and Pyrenees Highways pass through the Shire and provide it with good connections to the surrounding region and to Melbourne. However the good external road connections combined with the small population has resulted in residents relying to some extent on the nearby regional centres and large towns for employment and to meet their needs for retail services, community services and entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flag Stone 39, May 2017
    The Flag Stone Issue No. 39, May 2017 Patron: Lyn Allison ISSN 2204-8316 Editor: Bruce Munday T Integrity and Credibility Compiled by Bruce Munday Professional waller Stuart McGhee being tested for Intermediate level certification (Mt Annan, 2016) ne of the goals of the DSWAA is ‘That the craft of dry stone walling grows as a modern reinforcement of the Ocontribution that dry stone walls and structures have made to the culture of Australia’. At a recent DSWAA Strategy Day Geoff Duggan*, a Professional Member of DSWAA made the following observation: Reading the Goals of the Association there is no mention of promoting best practice. I take issue with DSWAA endorsing anyone wishing to call themselves a professional dry stone waller so long as they pay an annual membership fee of $50. This puts the onus back on the client to assess the standard of the waller’s work, when in fact most clients and even some wallers cannot tell the difference between good and poor structural work. In other countries with similar organisations, listing requires levels of competency demonstrated through structured craftsman certification schemes. The scheme adopted by many countries is that of the Dry Stone Walling Association of Great Britain (DSWA GB). The problem we face in Australia is the familiar tyranny of distance – relatively few wallers a great distance apart. Having said this I acknowledge that there are good wallers who have not gone through an accreditation process. This could be due to the inconvenience or simply disinterest in the process, recognising that many wallers work only part-time with dry stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Fragrant Leek-Orchid Prasophyllum Sp
    Action Statement Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 No. 147 Fragrant Leek-orchid Prasophyllum sp. aff. suaveolens (Western Basalt Plains) Distribution The Fragrant Leek-orchid [Prasophyllum suaveolens D.L. Jones & R.J. Bates and Prasophyllum sp. aff. suaveolens (Western Basalt Plains)] is endemic to Victoria, occurring in the Victorian Volcanic Plain Bioregion (Derrinallum, Wingeel, Ballarat, Streatham areas). It was formerly recorded but now extinct west and southwest of Melbourne at Werribee, St Albans, Albion, Laverton, Lara, Tottenham and Merri Merri Creek, and from near Creswick. Fewer than 300 plants are known in the wild, in five populations. Its former abundance not known but assumed to be many thousands across its natural range. The Fragrant Leek-orchid is not reserved, occurring on sites managed by Shire of Moyne, Golden Plains Shire, Shire of Corangamite, Rural City of Ararat and the Australian Rail Track Corporation. Fragrant Leek-orchid Prasophyllum suaveolens (Photo: John Eichler) Habitat The Fragrant Leek-orchid occurs in open species rich native grassland dominated by Themeda triandra with perennial herbs and lilies on poorly drained red-brown soil derived from basalt. Critical habitat has not been determined but fire or other disturbance such as slashing is highly likely to promote flowering. Conservation status National conservation status Former Range The Fragrant Leek-orchid has been listed as Ξ ] Present Range endangered under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Distribution in Victoria (DSE 2004) Conservation Act 1999. An assessment using the IUCN Criteria has not been undertaken. 1 Victorian conservation status • The Western (Basalt) Plains Grassland habitat Fragrant Leek-orchid has been listed as threatened where P.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Industrial Report Rural City of Benalla ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    Regional Industrial Report Rural City of Benalla ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Urban Development Program was undertaken by Spatial Economics Pty Ltd, and commissioned by the Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure. The Urban Development Program (Benalla) would not have been possible if it were not for the invaluable contribution made by staff from the Rural City of Benalla and the Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure’s Hume Regional Office. Published by the Urban Development Program Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure 1 Spring Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Telephone (03) 9223 1783 September 2013 Unless indicated otherwise, this work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au Urban Development Program, State of Victoria through the Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure 2013 Authorised by Matthew Guy, 1 Spring Street Melbourne Victoria 3000. This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for an error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format, please telephone (03) 9223 1783 or email [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Emergency Management Plan
    MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN AUGUST 2018 HEPBURN SHIRE COUNCIL T: 03 5348 2306 www.hepburn.vic.gov.au [email protected] MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................... 8 2. HISTORY OF EMERGENCIES ..................................................................................................... 10 3. HEPBURN SHIRE AREA DESCRIPTION ................................................................................. 11 4. REDUCTION - RISK MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................... 21 5. THE HSC RISK MANAGEMENT ACTION SUB-PLAN ........................................................ 29 6. READINESS– PLANNING & PREPARATION ....................................................................... 31 7. MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN (MEMP)........................................... 33 8. MEMP ACTION WORK PLAN ..................................................................................................... 36 9. MUNICIPAL EM PLANNING COMMITTEE (MEMPC) ....................................................... 37 10. PREPARING FOR EMERGENCIES ............................................................................................ 38 11. BUILDING COMMUNITY RESILIENCE ................................................................................... 41 12. MUNICIPAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT .............................................................................
    [Show full text]