Effects of De-Icing Agents (Magnesium Chloride and Sodium Chloride) on Corrosion of Truck Components

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effects of De-Icing Agents (Magnesium Chloride and Sodium Chloride) on Corrosion of Truck Components Report No. CDOT-DTD-R-1000-lO Final Report Effects of De-Icing Agents (Magnesium Chloride and Sodium Chloride) on Corrosion of Truck Components Prof. Yunping Xi Patricia J. Olsgard November 2000 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BRANCH Effects of De-Icing Agents (Magnesium Chloride and Sodium Chloride) on Corrosion of Truck Components by Principal Investigators Prof. Yunping Xi University of Colorado at Boulder and Patricia J. Olsgard Western Highway Institute Report No. CDOT-DTD-R-OO-IO Final Report Prepared by Colorado Department of Transportation Research Branch November 2000 Colorado Department of Transportation Research Branch 420 1 E. Arkansas Ave. Denver, CO 80222 (303) 757-9506 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. CDOT -DTD-R-2000-10 4. Title and Suotitle S. Report Date Effects of De-Icing Agents (Magnesium Chloride and Sodium Chloride) on November 2000 Corrosion of Truck Components 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Prof. Yunping Xi, University of Colorado at Boulder Patricia 1. Oisgard, Western Highway Institute 9. Perfonning Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) University or Colorado at Boulder Western Highway Institute 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Colorado Department of Transportation 4201 East Arkansas Avenue Final Report Denver, Colorado 80222 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract Colorado DOT has been using MgCl2 for anti-icing and deicing for several years. Some concerns have surfaced that the chemicals may affect various components of cars and trucks. In this experimental study carried out at the Materials Laboratory at CU-Boulder, representative metals were selected from the automobile industry to compare their corrosion behaviors under exposures to deicing salts NaCI and MgCh. Both reagent grade MgCh and the MgCh used by CDOT (which contains a corrosion inhibitor) were used in the testing process. Two testing methods were applied to the selected metals: SAE 12334 (an accelerated cyclic test); and, ASTM B 117 (a continuous spraying test). The testing environment of SAE 12334 provided cyclic exposure, which is a better simulation of actual service conditions. While CDOT specifications state that magnesium chloride must be 70% less corrosive than sodium chloride, experimental results obtained by SAE J2334 indicated that MgCl2 is more c011"osive than NaCl to the bare metals tested. Corrosion varied from only slight differences for some metals to 13 time more corrosion for SS41O. The experimental results from ASTM B 117 showed inconsistencies when compared with thc results of SAE 12334, especially for the stainless steel SS41O, for which NaCI is more corrosive than MgCI2• The experiment also indicated that the mixture of MgCl2 and NaCl caused slightly more corrosion to the metals than either single salt (either MgCh or NaCl) on three of the four metals tested does. This implies that there are coupling effects between the two chlorides to the corrosion of the metals. Implementation Deicers provided by vendors should be monitored independently by CDOT for chemical characteristics. Any significant changes in processing or source material should be disclosed by the vendor. Colorado-based specifications, specifically with respect to corrosion inhibitors must be strictly adhered to. Because mild steel was not included in this research study, further implementation of findings from this report will be delayed until an additional study on the con'osive effects of magnesium chloride on mild steel is completed. 17. Key Word!; 18. Distribution Statement Environment, Winter Maintenance, Deicing, Magnesium No restriction. This document is available to the public through: Chloride, Sodium Chloride, Corrosion National Technical Information Service 5825 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 19. Security Classlf. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price None None 78 Table of Contents Section I: Introductioll Page 1.1 Background I 1.2 Overview of Study 2 1.3 Theory of Metal Corrosion 2 1.4 Mechanisms of the Corrosion of Metallic 3 Materials Caused by Deicing Salts Section ll: Research Procedures, Methods and Results 2.1 Corrosion Testing Methods Used in Project 5 2.2 Experiment Materials 8 2.3 Equipment 10 2.4 Field Testing Procedures 10 Section m: Experimental Results and Discussion 3.1 Cyclic Exposure Test by the SAB J2334 Method 14 3.2 Continuous Spray Test by the ASTM BI17 Method 18 3.3 Comparison of the Cyclic Exposure Test 19 and the Continuous Spray Test 3.4 Corrosion of Copper Tubes 19 3.5 In-service Tests 22 3.6 Chemical and Microscopic Analyses 24 3.7 Corrosion induced by MgCI2 27 3.8 Conclusions from Experimental Testing 28 Section IV: Survey of Colorado Tnll:king Companies 4.1 Overview of Survey 30 4 .2 Survey Results 30 "Section V: Literature Review and Secondary Information 5.1 Information from Other States 33 5.2 Literature Review/ Research on Automotive Corrosion 39 5.3 Research Summary of Deicer Studies 42 5.4 ASTM Standards on Corrosion Testing 45 5.5 Accelerated Corrosion Test Methods in the Automobile Industry 46 Section VI: Conclusions & Recommendations for Future Study 6.1 Conclusions 52 6.2 Recommendations for Future Study 54 Appendices: Appendix I: Tabulated Data 56 Appendix 2: Additional Corrosion Photos 62 Appendix 3: Trucking Company Survey 73 Appendix 4: References 75 Appendix 5: Trucking/State Contacts 77 Appendix 6: Research Team 78 Abstract Colorado DOT has been using MgCh for anti-icing and deicing fur several years. Some concerns have surfaced that the chemicals may affect various components of cars and trucks. In this experimental study carried out at the Materials Laboratory at CU-Boulder, representative metals were selected from the automobile industry to compare their corrosion behaviors under exposures to deieing salts NaCI and MgCh. Both reagent grade MgCh and the MgCh used by CDOT (which contains a corrosion inhibitor) were used in the testing process. Two testing methods were applied to the selected metals: SAE J2334 (an accelerated cyclic test); and, ASTM B117 (a continuous spraying test). The testing environment of SAE J2334 provided cyclic exposure, whieh is a better simulation of actual service conditions. Experimental results obtained by SAE 12334 indicated that MgCh is more corrosive than NaCI to the bare metals tested. The experimental results from ASTM B117 showed inconsistencies when compared with the results ofSAE J2334, especially for the stainless steel SS410, for which NaCI is more corrosive than MgCh. The experiment also indicated that the mixture ofMgCh and NaCI caused more severe corrosion to the metals than any single salt (either MgCh or NaCl) does. This implies that there are coupling effects between the two chlorides to the corrosion of the metals. Executive Summary The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) uses liquid magnesIUm chloride (MgCI2) in several areas of Colorado as both an anti-icing and a deicing agent. Magnesium chloride is used in the Denver metro area, 1-70 west through Glenwood Springs and a few other spots where meeting air-born particulate standards is a problem. In conjunction with, and instead of magnesium chloride, CDOT also uses a dry mixture of sodium chloride (NaCl) &"1d sand (5-10%). The sand salt mixture is used when it is too cold for magnesium chloride to effectively melt snow and ice. Trucking companies expressed concern that the use of magnesium chloride has caused increased vehicle maintenance costs. Because of the nature of the industry, trucks often travel the same route on a daily basis, and subsequently encounter a high level of chemical deicers. To investigate whether the perception that magnesium chloride damages trucks is widespread, a survey was sent to over 150 Colorado trucking companies. Seventy-two percent of the respondents reported noticing increased wear on their equipment since Colorado began using rr~gnesium chloride. Companies reported the most damage to chrome, tractor or trailer bodies, aluminum parts, wheels, hoses and connectors, and electrical parts. The specific type of damage mentioned most often included corrosion, pitting, staining/tarnishing, discoloration, drying/cracking (hoses), and accelerated rust. The project started with an extensive literature review on the relevant information Based on the collected information, two experimental methods and several types of metal specimens were selected for the experimental program. Then, an experimental study was performed in the Materials Laboratory at CU-Boulder. Some of the specimens were also placed on trucks traveling in the state of Colorado. In this experimental study, representative metals were selected from the automobile industry to compare their corrosion behaviors under exposures to deicing salts NaCI and MgCh. Both reagent grade MgCh and the MgCh used by CDOT which contains a corrosion inhibitor w= used to test the metals. The metals tested included stainless steel 41 0 and 4L, aluminum 2024 and 5086. In addition to the metal coupons, coated coupons from automobile body sheets were also tested. Two testing methods were applied to the selected metals. One is SAE J2334, which is an accelerated cyclic corrosion test representing the in-service environments; and the other is ASlM B 117, which is a continuous spraying test representing a different corrosive environment and mechanism. For each of the two selected testing methods, two ~s (i.e., sodium chloride and magnesium chloride) were used as the corrosive medium, r~pectively. In order to examine the corrosiveness of the deicing salts to electrical components, an electrochemical test unit was devised, in which the difference in the corrosion potential of the copper specimens in the two chloride solutions were measured. The in-service exposure test was carried out on Colorado highways during the winter of 1999 to verify the results from the laboratory experiments.
Recommended publications
  • Sodium Chloride (Halite, Common Salt Or Table Salt, Rock Salt)
    71376, 71386 Sodium chloride (Halite, Common Salt or Table Salt, Rock Salt) CAS number: 7647-14-5 Product Description: Molecular formula: NaCl Appearance: white powder (crystalline) Molecular weight: 58.44 g/mol Density of large crystals: 2.17 g/ml1 Melting Point: 804°C1 Density: 1.186 g/ml (5 M in water)2 2 Solubility: 1 M in H2O, 20°C, complete, clear, colorless 2 pH: 5.0-8.0 (1 M in H2O, 25°C) Store at room temperature Sodium chloride is geologically stable. If kept dry, it will remain a free-flowing solid for years. Traces of magnesium or calcium chloride in commercial sodium chloride adsorb moisture, making it cake. The trace moisture does not harm the material chemically in any way. 71378 BioUltra 71386 BioUltra for molecular biology, 5 M Solution The products are suitable for different applications like purification, precipitation, crystallisation and other applications which require tight control of elemental content. Trace elemental analyses have been performed for all qualities. The molecular biology quality is also tested for absence of nucleases. The Certificate of Analysis provides lot-specific results. Much of the sodium chloride is mined from salts deposited from evaporation of brine of ancient oceans, or recovered from sea water by solar evaporation. Due to the presence of trace hygroscopic minerals, food-grade salt has a small amount of silicate added to prevent caking; as a result, concentrated solutions of "table salt" are usually slightly cloudy in appearance. 71376 and 71386 do not contain any anti-caking agent. Applications: Sodium chloride is a commonly used chemical found in nature and in all body tissue, and is considered an essential nutrient.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering Evidence for Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals That Elicit Differential Susceptibility Through Gene-Environment Interactions
    toxics Review Uncovering Evidence for Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals That Elicit Differential Susceptibility through Gene-Environment Interactions Dylan J. Wallis 1 , Lisa Truong 2 , Jane La Du 2, Robyn L. Tanguay 2 and David M. Reif 1,* 1 Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] (L.T.); [email protected] (J.L.D.); [email protected] (R.L.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) is linked to myriad disorders, charac- terized by the disruption of the complex endocrine signaling pathways that govern development, physiology, and even behavior across the entire body. The mechanisms of endocrine disruption in- volve a complex system of pathways that communicate across the body to stimulate specific receptors that bind DNA and regulate the expression of a suite of genes. These mechanisms, including gene regulation, DNA binding, and protein binding, can be tied to differences in individual susceptibility across a genetically diverse population. In this review, we posit that EDCs causing such differential responses may be identified by looking for a signal of population variability after exposure. We begin Citation: Wallis, D.J.; Truong, L.; La by summarizing how the biology of EDCs has implications for genetically diverse populations. We Du, J.; Tanguay, R.L.; Reif, D.M. then describe how gene-environment interactions (GxE) across the complex pathways of endocrine Uncovering Evidence for Endocrine- signaling could lead to differences in susceptibility. We survey examples in the literature of individual Disrupting Chemicals That Elicit susceptibility differences to EDCs, pointing to a need for research in this area, especially regarding Differential Susceptibility through the exceedingly complex thyroid pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Calcium Chloride CAS N°:10043-52-4
    OECD SIDS CALCIUM CHLORIDE FOREWORD INTRODUCTION Calcium chloride CAS N°:10043-52-4 UNEP PUBLICATIONS 1 OECD SIDS CALCIUM CHLORIDE SIDS Initial Assessment Report For SIAM 15 Boston, USA 22-25th October 2002 1. Chemical Name: Calcium chloride 2. CAS Number: 10043-52-4 3. Sponsor Country: Japan National SIDS Contact Point in Sponsor Country: Mr. Yasuhisa Kawamura Director Second Organization Div. Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2-2-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100 4. Shared Partnership with: 5. Roles/Responsibilities of the Partners: • Name of industry sponsor Tokuyama Corporation /consortium Mr. Shigeru Moriyama, E-mail: [email protected] Mr. Norikazu Hattori, E-mail: [email protected] • Process used 6. Sponsorship History • How was the chemical or This substance is sponsored by Japan under ICCA Initiative and category brought into the is submitted for first discussion at SIAM 15. OECD HPV Chemicals Programme ? 7. Review Process Prior to The industry consortium collected new data and prepared the the SIAM: updated IUCLID, and draft versions of the SIAR and SIAP. Japanese government peer-reviewed the documents, audited selected studies. 8. Quality check process: 9. Date of Submission: 10. Date of last Update: 2 UNEP PUBLICATIONS OECD SIDS CALCIUM CHLORIDE 11. Comments: No testing (X) Testing ( ) The CaCl2-HPV Consortium members: (Japan) Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. Central Glass Co., Ltd. Sanuki Kasei Co., Ltd. Tokuyama Corporation [a global leader of the CaCl2-HPV Consortium] Tosoh Corporation (Europe) Brunner Mond (UK) Ltd. Solvay S.A. (North America) The Dow Chemical Company General Chemical Industrial Products Inc. Tetra Technologies, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Mgcl2 and Kcl Recovery from Brine Wastewater
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Senior Design Reports (CBE) Engineering 4-2016 MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater Arthur M. Rempel University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Kyra G. Berger University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Elyssa A. Gensib University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Aspen N. Walker University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cbe_sdr Part of the Biochemical and Biomolecular Engineering Commons Rempel, Arthur M.; Berger, Kyra G.; Gensib, Elyssa A.; and Walker, Aspen N., "MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater" (2016). Senior Design Reports (CBE). 82. https://repository.upenn.edu/cbe_sdr/82 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/cbe_sdr/82 For more information, please contact [email protected]. MgCl2 and KCl Recovery from Brine Wastewater Abstract This project’s aim was to design an improved brine wastewater treatment system for desalination facilities. While a multitude of methods exist to do so, General Electric (GE)’s brine concentrator is leading the market by providing a method that not only treats the brine waste, but also recovers anywhere from 60- 94% of the water from the feed. However, their brine concentrator is relatively inefficient omfr both a financial and energetic perspective; our goal was to develop a system to match their results, while limiting costs and energy usage as best possible. We subsequently designed a system (referred to from here on out as the ‘MgCl2 Separation Unit’) to accomplish the aforementioned objectives. In addition to recovering pure water from concentrated brine, our process also recovers high purity MgCl2 and KCl crystals that are later sold to alleviate the overall process costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnesium Magic by Terri Saunders
    Magnesium Magic By Terri Saunders Minerals provide the physical elements that comprise life and fats and amino acids and create the physical structure of the of all the minerals on Earth, none are as essential to life as the body based on the genetic blueprint provided by the RNA and element magnesium. The Chinese word for magnesium is DNA. “mei” meaning beautiful mineral, and traditional Chinese Magnesium does an intricate dance with calcium to regulate healers consider it to be paramount in healing properties due to significant body functions. Magnesium plays a critical role in its ability to prevent and cure disease, maintain health and the function of the nervous system by acting as a gatekeeper for promote longevity. Dr. Jerry Aikawa refers to magnesium as calcium, permitting just enough calcium to enter a nerve cell to the most important mineral to man and all other living allow electrical transmission along the nerves to and from the organisms. brain, then forcing the calcium back out again. This exchange Deposits of magnesium were discovered by man near the provides the electrical spark that powers our thoughts and ancient Greek city of Magnesia. Magnesium sulfate (Epsom emotions. While calcium contracts muscle fibers, magnesium salts) was employed then as a laxative and still is today. relaxes muscles. When there is too much calcium and Magnesium was also used to heal a variety of conditions insufficient magnesium inside a cell the muscles stay contracted including heartburn, depression, vertigo, ulcers, kidney stones, resulting in spasms, twitches and even convulsions. jaundice, gout and worms. In the last 40 years, over 1,000 There are many smooth muscles in the body that can over- laboratory studies have been conducted revealing at least a contract and go into spasm when magnesium is deficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Drugs Are Excluded from Medicare Part D, but Are Covered by Your Medicaid Benefits Under the Healthpartners® MSHO Plan (HMO)
    Some drugs are excluded from Medicare Part D, but are covered by your Medicaid benefits under the HealthPartners® MSHO Plan (HMO). These drugs include some over‐the‐counter (OTC) items, vitamins, and cough and cold medicines. If covered, these drugs will have no copay and will not count toward your total drug cost. For questions, please call Member Services at 952‐967‐7029 or 1‐888‐820‐4285. TTY members should call 952‐883‐6060 or 1‐800‐443‐0156. From October 1 through February 14, we take calls from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., seven days a week. You’ll speak with a representative. From February 15 to September 30, call us 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Friday to speak with a representative. On Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, you can leave a message and we’ll get back to you within one business day. Drug Description Strength 3 DAY VAGINAL 4% 5‐HYDROXYTRYPTOPHAN 50 MG ABSORBASE ACETAMINOPHEN 500 MG ACETAMINOPHEN 120MG ACETAMINOPHEN 325 MG ACETAMINOPHEN 650MG ACETAMINOPHEN 80 MG ACETAMINOPHEN 650 MG ACETAMINOPHEN 160 MG/5ML ACETAMINOPHEN 500 MG/5ML ACETAMINOPHEN 160 MG/5ML ACETAMINOPHEN 500MG/15ML ACETAMINOPHEN 100 MG/ML ACETAMINOPHEN 500 MG ACETAMINOPHEN 325 MG ACETAMINOPHEN 500 MG ACETAMINOPHEN 80 MG ACETAMINOPHEN 100.00% ACETAMINOPHEN 80 MG ACETAMINOPHEN 160 MG ACETAMINOPHEN 80MG/0.8ML ACETAMINOPHEN‐BUTALBITAL 50MG‐325MG ACNE CLEANSING PADS 2% ACNE TREATMENT,EXTRA STRENGTH 10% ACT ANTI‐CAVITY MOUTH RINSE 0.05% Updated 12/01/2012 ACTICAL ACTIDOSE‐AQUA 50G/240ML ACTIDOSE‐AQUA 15G/72ML ACTIDOSE‐AQUA 25G/120ML ACTIVATED CHARCOAL 25 G ADEKS 7.5 MG
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Review Protocol for the Inorganic Mercury Salts IRIS Assessment
    EPA/635/R-20/239 IRIS Assessment Protocol www.epa.gov/iris Systematic Review Protocol for the Inorganic Mercury Salts IRIS Assessment CASRN 7487-94-7 (Mercuric Chloride) CASRN 1344-48-5 (Mercuric Sulfide) CASRN 10112-91-1 (Mercurous Chloride) February 2021 Integrated Risk Information System Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC Systematic Review Protocol for the Inorganic Mercury Salts IRIS Assessment DISCLAIMER This document is a preliminary draft for review purposes only. This information is distributed solely for review purposes under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the Environmental Protection Agency. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any Agency determination or policy. It is being circulated for comments on its technical clarity and science policy implications. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This document is a draft for review purposes only and does not constitute Agency policy. ii DRAFT―DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE Systematic Review Protocol for the Inorganic Mercury Salts IRIS Assessment CONTENTS AUTHORS|CONTRIBUTORS|REVIEWERS ........................................................................................................ 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Article in Press
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Light Metals xxx ,2001) xxx±xxx www.elsevier.com/locate/ligandmet 2 A thermochemical analysis of the production of anhydrous MgCl2 a b, 3 Georges J. Kipouros , Donald R. Sadoway * 4 a Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Dalhousie University, 1360 Barrington Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2X4 5 b Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA 6 Abstract 7 The electrolytic production of magnesium requires high-purity, anhydrous magnesium chloride which has a high anity for 8 water and is found in nature as a plurality of hydrates ,MgCl2 Á nH2O, n 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12). Their dehydration is nontrivial and can 9 be accompanied by hydrolysis leading to the production of undesirable oxycompounds of magnesium.PROOF Through an analysis of the 10 relevant thermochemistry this paper indicates howto prevent hydrolysis and make electrolytic-grade, anhydrous MgCl 2. Ó 2001 11 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. 12 Keywords: Magnesium; Hydrolysis; Dehydration; Thermochemistry 13 1. Introduction 2. Background 38 14 With a density of 1:74 g=cm3 magnesium is 4.5 times A cubic kilometer of seawater contains approxi- 39 15 lighter than steel and 1.6 times lighter than aluminum mately a million tones of magnesium, more than has 40 16 [1]. The mechanical properties of magnesium castings ever been produced in one year by all the magnesium 41 17 make them competitive with aluminum castings. When plants in the world. Furthermore, seawater contains 42 18 hot worked, magnesium is the easiest to deep draw of only 3.7% of the total magnesium present in the earth's 43 19 the common metals and requires the least energy to crust.
    [Show full text]
  • Chloride Ions As Integral Parts of Hydrogen Bonded Networks in Aqueous Salt Solutions: the Appearance of Solvent Separated Anion Pairs†
    Chloride ions as integral parts of hydrogen bonded networks in aqueous salt solutions: the appearance of solvent separated anion pairs† Ildikó Pethes*,a, Imre Bakób, László Pusztaia,c aWigner Research Centre for Physics, Konkoly Thege út 29-33., H-1121 Budapest, Hungary bResearch Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar tudósok körútja 2, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary cInternational Research Organisation for Advanced Science and Technology (IROAST), Kumamoto University, 2-39-1 Kurokami, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan Abstract Hydrogen bonding to chloride ions has been frequently discussed over the past 5 decades. Still, the possible role of such secondary intermolecular bonding interactions in hydrogen bonded networks has not been investigated in any detail. Here we consider computer models of concentrated aqueous LiCl solutions and compute usual hydrogen bond network characteristics, such as distributions of cluster sizes and of cyclic entities, both for models that take and do not take chloride ions into account. During the analysis of hydrogen bonded rings, a significant amount of ‘solvent separated anion pairs’ have been detected at high LiCl concentrations. It is demonstrated that taking halide anions into account as organic constituents of the hydrogen bonded network does make the interpretation of structural details significantly more meaningful than when considering water molecules only. Finally, we compare simulated structures generated by ‘good’ and ‘bad’ potential sets on the basis of the tools * Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: … 1 developed here, and show that this novel concept is, indeed, also helpful for distinguishing between reasonable and meaningless structural models.
    [Show full text]
  • 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP Visiv
    SODIUM CHLORIDE- sodium chloride injection, solution ICU Medical, Inc. ---------- 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP VisIV ™ Container Rx only DESCRIPTION 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP is sterile and nonpyrogenic. It is a parenteral solution containing sodium chloride in water for injection intended for intravenous administration. Each 100 mL of 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP contains 900 mg sodium chloride in water for injection. Electrolytes per 1000 mL: sodium (Na+) 154 mEq; chloride (Cl−) 154 mEq. The osmolarity is 308 mOsmol/L (calc.). The pH for the 100 mL and smaller containers is 6.0; for the 250 mL, the pH is 5.6. The pH range is 4.5 to 7.0 for all containers. This solution contains no bacteriostat, antimicrobial agent or added buffer and is intended only as a single-dose injection. When smaller doses are required, the unused portion should be discarded. 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP is a parenteral fluid and electrolyte replenisher. Sodium Chloride, USP is chemically designated NaCl, a white crystalline powder freely soluble in water. Water for Injection, USP is chemically designated H2O. The flexible plastic container is fabricated from a clear multilayer polyolefin plastic film. Exposure to temperatures above 25°C (77°F) during transport and storage will lead to minor losses in moisture content. Higher temperatures lead to greater losses. It is unlikely that these minor losses will lead to clinically significant changes within the expiration period. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY When administered intravenously, these solutions provide a source of water and electrolytes. Solutions which provide combinations of hypotonic or isotonic concentrations of sodium chloride are suitable for parenteral maintenance or replacement of water and electrolyte requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Sodium Hypochlorite Stability
    SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE STABILITY Sodium hypochlorite is an excellent sanitiser that is commonly used in industries world-wide. Its’ popularity is derived from the fact that while it has a proven wide-spectrum of activity, it deodorises, it is non- poisonous in low concentrations and it breaks down to give harmless naturally occurring products (salt, water, oxygen). While sodium hypochlorite has many positive aspects it is a reactive compound that degrades over time. The decomposition reaction is as follows: 2 NaOCl → 2NaCl + O2 Sodium Sodium Oxygen Hypochlorite Chloride The stability and shelf life of commercially available sodium hypochlorite is adversely affected by the following factors: • Heat - For example: the shelf life of 12.5% sodium hypochlorite is decreased by a factor of approximately three times when the storage temperature is raised from 25°C to 35°C. • Low pH - Lowering the pH will decrease the sodium hypochlorite in solution, and can liberate free chlorine. • Sunlight - Exposure to UV light degrades sodium hypochlorite. • Contamination - The presence of certain metals in solution (eg nickel) will promote degradation. Some metals (e.g. iron) are not particularly detrimental to the stability. Standards Australia has recognised the stability issues associated with sodium hypochlorite. In AS1087- 1991 (“Sodium hypochlorite solutions for use in the dairying industry”, which is the most relevant standard available) the standard states: 1) “When solutions of sodium hypochlorite are allowed to stand, the amount of available chlorine slowly diminishes” and 2) “Two consequences of this decomposition are that first, the chemical properties specified must be determined, and the product delivered to the customer without undue delay; and second, the concentration of the sanitising solution must be checked before use and, if necessary, allowance made when sanitising if the solution is under-strength.” AS1087-1991 sets a few minimum requirements for stability of 12.5% sodium hypochlorite: • The initial product must have a level of 125– 135 g/L available chlorine.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnesium Chloride | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    PATIENT & CAREGIVER EDUCATION Magnesium Chloride This information from Lexicomp® explains what you need to know about this medication, including what it’s used for, how to take it, its side effects, and when to call your healthcare provider. Brand Names: US Chloromag [DSC]; Mag-SR Plus Calcium [OTC]; Magdelay [OTC] [DSC]; Nu-Mag [OTC]; Slow Magnesium/Calcium [OTC]; Slow-Mag [OTC]; SlowMag Mg Muscle/Heart [OTC] What is this drug used for? It is used to treat or prevent low magnesium levels. What do I need to tell my doctor BEFORE I take this drug? If you are allergic to this drug; any part of this drug; or any other drugs, foods, or substances. Tell your doctor about the allergy and what signs you had. If you have any of these health problems: Heart disease or kidney disease. This is not a list of all drugs or health problems that interact with this drug. Tell your doctor and pharmacist about all of your drugs (prescription or OTC, natural products, vitamins) and health problems. You must check to make sure that it is safe for you to take this drug with all of your drugs and health problems. Do not start, stop, or change the dose of any drug without checking with your doctor. Magnesium Chloride 1/6 What are some things I need to know or do while I take this drug? All products: Tell all of your health care providers that you take this drug. This includes your doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and dentists. Have blood work checked as you have been told by the doctor.
    [Show full text]