DOCSLIB.ORG

BSCB Newsletter 2019A:BSCB Aut2k7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BSCB Newsletter 2019A:BSCB Aut2k7 2019 BSCB Magazine BRITISH SOCIETY FOR CELL BIOLOGY 2019 CONTENTS BSCB Magazine News 2 Book reviews 8 Features 9 Meeting Reports 21 Summer students 25 Society Business 32 Editorial Front cover: microscopic Welcome to the 2019 BSCB Magazine! This year Mustafa Aydogan (University of Oxford), as well as to structure of pectoral fin and Susana and Stephen are filling in for our Newsletter BSCB postdoc poster of the year winners Dr Anna hypaxial muscles of a zebrafish Editor Ann Wheeler. We hope you will enjoy this Caballe (University of Oxford) and Dr Agata Gluszek- Danio rerio larvae at four days year’s magazine! Kustusz (University of Edinburgh). post fertilization. The immunostaining highlights the This year we had a number of fantastic one day In 2019, we will have our jointly BSCB-BSDB organization of fast (red) and meetings sponsored by BSCB. These focus meetings Spring meeting at Warwick University from 7th–10th slow (green) myosins. All nuclei are great way to meet and discuss your science with April, organised by BSCB members Susana Godinho are highlighted in blue (hoechst). experts in your field and to strengthen your network of and Vicky Sanz-Moreno. The programme for this collaborators within the UK. You can read more about meeting, which usually provides a broad spectrum of these meetings in the magazine. If you have an idea themes, has a focus on cancer biology: cell for a focus one day meeting, check how to apply for migration/invasion, organelle biogenesis, trafficking, funding on page 4. Our ambassadors have also been cell-cell communication. While most sessions will run very busy organising events at their local institutions in parallel, will also have one joint session between to recruit new members to the society. Ambassadors both societies on genome integrity and regulation. Two play an extremely important role in advertising BSCB inspirational scientists will be giving the plenary meetings, the science writing and image competitions, lectures: Mina Bissel and Sally Temple. For more and promoting the society in general. Thanks to all of information about this conference please go to them! www.bscb.org. Information about travel awards can We truly enjoyed the 2018 BSCB Spring meeting also be found on the BSCB website. Dynamic Cell III, which took place in Manchester This year we have several articles written by Conference Centre from 18th-21th of March and was undergraduate students who carried out research in jointly organised by BSCB and the Biochemical BSCB members laboratories. This programme has Society. A big thanks to BSCB committee member been a success with so many students developing Anne Straube for doing a great job putting this great research and a passion for cell biology! Visit our meeting together. As usual, this meeting was a website for information on how to apply for these success amongst cell biology aficionados, covering studentships! several topics from cytoskeleton, mitosis, cell-cell Get in touch with us if you have ideas for an article. communication and lots of cool imaging! We had We are always happy to hear from you! fantastic talks, including the ones by our own Hooke Looking forward to seeing you at Warwick Medal prize winner Andrew McAinsh and WICB prize University in April! winner Meritxell Huch. If you want to know more about either of them, check out their interviews with Journal Cell Science and our Postdoc committee rep. Susana Godinho, Stephen Robinson and Ann Congrats to BSCB Young Cell Biologist of the year, Wheeler, BSCB 2019 Newsletter Editors Cerys Currie (University of Warwik) and runner up Magazine editor: Susana Godinho, Stephen Robinson and Ann Wheeler Production: Giles Newton 1 Website: www.bscb.org Printer: Hobbs NEWS Society News BSCB President’s Report 2018 This has been an exciting and trafficking and organelle commits to being busy year for the BSCB. It biogenesis, with an impressive on the committee started in March 2018, when list of top international for three years, we shared our annual meeting speakers. PhD students and which can be with the Biochemical Society postdocs get the opportunity to extended to a in Manchester. ‘Dynamic Cell meet the speakers one evening maximum of six III’ was a great success, with in the bar, and also have a years. This year we capacity audiences of over 200 career workshop before dinner said thank you to Melanie which allows us to fund in the lecture theatre. This was on 7 April. I hope that Pagnini (PhD student rep), and summer studentships for the third of what has now current BSCB PhD students welcomed Joyce Yu as our new undergraduates to gain become a series of meetings and postdocs will register for PhD student rep. We also experience in working in a entitled ‘The Dynamic Cell’, the meeting and encourage welcomed Folma Buss, Jason BSCB member’s laboratory, as which started in Edinburgh in their colleagues to attend too. King and Carine de Marcos well as provide travel awards 2009, followed by a joint Lousa as new committee for BSCB members to attend BSCB/Biochemical Society In addition to our annual members. In addition, our meetings, as well as ‘Dynamic Cell II’ in Cambridge meeting, the BSCB sponsor BSCB committee member workshops and courses to in 2014. We are really one-day focused meetings on a Jenny Rohn has taken on a learn about new techniques. If grateful to our Anne Straube variety of cell biological topics, new role for the committee as you are a PhD student or (BSCB meetings secretary) and which are organised by BSCB Science Advocacy Officer. She postdoc, you can apply for her co-organisers for their hard members. Several of them is our link with the Royal travel funds towards any work in putting the 2018 have been running annually for Society of Biology (RSB), a meeting or course relevant to programme together. over 10 years, including the professional body representing cell biology. Group leaders ‘Actin meeting’, ‘Microtubule many societies and who do not currently have any Highlights for me included the meeting’ and ‘Endocytosis organisations in the area of travel funds in their grants are two BSCB Medal Lectures from meeting’. Our aim is to serve biological sciences. The RSB also eligible to apply. Please do the 2018 BSCB Hooke Medal the UK cell biology community carries out public check out our website to find winner Andrew McAinsh through these meetings, communication of science, out what is available and how (University of Warwick), and particularly through having education outreach, and to apply. the BSCB Women in Cell PhD students and postdocs informs and lobbies the Biology Early Career Award give most of the talks. By government on behalf of its The BSCB committee looks Medal winner Meritxell Huch providing sponsorship, the members and member forward to meeting many (Gurdon Institute, Cambridge). BSCB helps to keep the organisations. If you are BSCB members in 2019 at our Andrew gave a fascinating meeting costs down so that interested in any of these annual meeting in Warwick movie-filled talk on his work whole laboratories can afford areas, please contact Jenny and/or at one of our sponsored investigating how microtubules to attend. and she can help you to get meetings. Please look out for interact with kinetochores to involved. our stand at these meetings to drive mitosis. Meritxell’s talk The committee welcome new talk to members of the demonstrated the power of proposals for meetings in areas We are very grateful to the committee and find out more organoid cultures to discover of cell biology that are not BSCB Ambassadors, who act about the BSCB. how liver tissues regenerate, currently covered by a locally within their and how this can go wrong in sponsored meeting, and indeed Institute/University to promote diseases such as cancer. the BSCB committee has the BSCB, BSCB meetings, Watch the BSCB website or recently agreed to fund a new and the values of BSCB Anne Ridley follow us on Twitter or sponsored meeting in 2019. membership. This year Andrew BSCB President Facebook for announcement of Please visit the BSCB website Carter (BSCB Membership the two 2019 Medal winners for information about future Secretary) and Carine de (and please note that any BSCB-sponsored meetings and Marcos Lousa sent BSCB BSCB member can nominate a how to apply for meeting marketing packs to all UK cell biologist for either sponsorship. Ambassadors, which we hope award). were helpful in encouraging The BSCB would not exist new PhD students and Our 2019 annual meeting will without the BSCB committee, postdocs to join the BSCB. If be at the University of Warwick who all provide their time you are interested in being a (7-10 April), this time shared voluntarily to organise BSCB BSCB Ambassador, please with the British Society for meetings, administer the contact Andrew Carter and he Developmental Biology finances, communicate with will send you details. (BSDB). This meeting will BSCB members, and run the include sessions on cell biology travel awards and summer The BSCB is generously funded topics including cell migration, studentships. Each person by the Company of Biologists, 2 NEWS New Student Rep – Joyce Yu Hello! I'm Joyce, your new PhD student representative. I am taking over from Melanie Panagi, who has done an amazing job in the past two years! I am a third-year student in Jean-Paul Vincent's group at the previously volunteered at local Francis Crick Institute, London. schools as a science tutor in I am originally from Hong Kong, Oxford, and also had fun but have been studying in the organising and designing UK for the past 8 years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Fourth Report of Senior Pay and Perks in UK Universities History This
    Transparency at the top? The fourth report of senior pay and perks in UK universities History This is the fourth report on pay and perks at the top of British higher education institutions (HEIs) to be published by the University and College Union (UCU). It forms part of the union’s ongoing campaign for greater transparency in higher education, including the rationale behind senior pay rises. UCU submitted a Freedom of Information (FoI) request to 158 HEIs in October 2017. This followed similar requests submitted in 2016, 2015 and 2014. All requests were designed to shine a light on the arbitrary nature of senior pay and perks in universities, and support the union’s call for reform. The basis for this report The FoI request that forms the basis of this report was sent to 158 (HEIs). It requested details of vice-chancellors’ (or head of institution if known by a different title) salaries and those of other senior post-holders earning over £100,000 at the institution during the academic year of 2016/17 (1 August 2016 to 31 July 2017). It also asked for details of flights, spending on hotels, spending on expenses and if the vice-chancellor was provided with accommodation by the university. Finally, we requested to know whether or not the vice-chancellor was a member of the remuneration committee, and requested a copy of the most recently ratified minutes of the institution’s remuneration committee. Variety of responses The questions on expenditure on flights, hotels, expenses and accommodation for vice-chancellors elicited a huge variation in responses with many institutions deploying exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act to avoid providing data.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamical Gene Regulatory Networks Are Tuned by Transcriptional Autoregulation with Microrna Feedback Thomas G
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Dynamical gene regulatory networks are tuned by transcriptional autoregulation with microRNA feedback Thomas G. Minchington1, Sam Grifths‑Jones2* & Nancy Papalopulu1* Concepts from dynamical systems theory, including multi‑stability, oscillations, robustness and stochasticity, are critical for understanding gene regulation during cell fate decisions, infammation and stem cell heterogeneity. However, the prevalence of the structures within gene networks that drive these dynamical behaviours, such as autoregulation or feedback by microRNAs, is unknown. We integrate transcription factor binding site (TFBS) and microRNA target data to generate a gene interaction network across 28 human tissues. This network was analysed for motifs capable of driving dynamical gene expression, including oscillations. Identifed autoregulatory motifs involve 56% of transcription factors (TFs) studied. TFs that autoregulate have more interactions with microRNAs than non‑autoregulatory genes and 89% of autoregulatory TFs were found in dual feedback motifs with a microRNA. Both autoregulatory and dual feedback motifs were enriched in the network. TFs that autoregulate were highly conserved between tissues. Dual feedback motifs with microRNAs were also conserved between tissues, but less so, and TFs regulate diferent combinations of microRNAs in a tissue‑dependent manner. The study of these motifs highlights ever more genes that have complex regulatory dynamics. These data provide a resource for the identifcation of TFs which regulate the dynamical properties of human gene expression. Cell fate changes are a key feature of development, regeneration and cancer, and are ofen thought of as a “land- scape” that cells move through1,2. Cell fate changes are driven by changes in gene expression: turning genes on or of, or changing their levels above or below a threshold where a cell fate change occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Womencount: Leaders in Higher Education 2016
    WomenCount Leaders in Higher Education 2016 A report by Norma Jarboe OBE ‘There’s no magic about getting a good gender balance – just dogged repetition of what a high priority it is and a determination to seek out strong women candidates who could hold their own against any competition.’ WomenCount ‘If universities inhibit the progression of talented female staff, they in turn are unable to reach their full potential. We know that universities make a huge contribution to society through research, teaching and partnerships with businesses, among many other activities.’ Professor Dame Athene Donald, Professor of Experimental Physics and Master of Churchill College, University of Cambridge WomenCount are very grateful to Perrett Laver for their support, the Government Equalities Office for their enagagement and Imperial College London for hosting the launch of this report on 2 March 2016. Cover quotation: Sir Nicholas Montagu, Chair of Council, Queen Mary University of London. Published by WomenCount © March 2016, all rights reserved. www.women-count.org Designed and produced by Graffeg. WomenCount: Leaders in Higher Education 2016 Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive summary 5 Introduction 6 Collective action 9 Collegial governance: diversity challenge or opportunity? 10 Governing bodies: women’s representation on the rise 11 Governing bodies: the balancing act 12 Chairs: few seats for women 14 Vice-Chancellors: barely a fifth are women 15 Chair and Vice-Chancellor teams 16 Executive teams: a pipeline of women leaders 17 Academic heads: less than a third are women 19 HEI income impact women’s leadership 21 Mapping Women’s Leadership in HEIs 22 Reflections on the research 27 The Index 37 Biographies of new Chairs 42 Biographies of new Vice-Chancellors 47 About WomenCount and the author 1 Foreword ‘Gender equality is not a matter of being nice to women.
    [Show full text]
  • Mothers in Science
    The aim of this book is to illustrate, graphically, that it is perfectly possible to combine a successful and fulfilling career in research science with motherhood, and that there are no rules about how to do this. On each page you will find a timeline showing on one side, the career path of a research group leader in academic science, and on the other side, important events in her family life. Each contributor has also provided a brief text about their research and about how they have combined their career and family commitments. This project was funded by a Rosalind Franklin Award from the Royal Society 1 Foreword It is well known that women are under-represented in careers in These rules are part of a much wider mythology among scientists of science. In academia, considerable attention has been focused on the both genders at the PhD and post-doctoral stages in their careers. paucity of women at lecturer level, and the even more lamentable The myths bubble up from the combination of two aspects of the state of affairs at more senior levels. The academic career path has academic science environment. First, a quick look at the numbers a long apprenticeship. Typically there is an undergraduate degree, immediately shows that there are far fewer lectureship positions followed by a PhD, then some post-doctoral research contracts and than qualified candidates to fill them. Second, the mentors of early research fellowships, and then finally a more stable lectureship or career researchers are academic scientists who have successfully permanent research leader position, with promotion on up the made the transition to lectureships and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • BSCB Newsletter 2017D
    2017 BSCB Newsletter BRITISH SOCIETY FOR CELL BIOLOGY Meet the new BSCB President Royal Opening of the Crick Meeting reports 2017 CONTENTS BSCB Newsletter News 2 Book reviews 7 Features 8 Meeting Reports 24 Summer students 30 Society Business 33 Editorial Welcome to the 2017 BSCB newsletter. After several meeting hosted several well received events for our Front cover: years of excellent service, Kate Nobes has stepped PhD and Postdoc members, which we discuss on The head of a Drosophila pupa. The developing down and handed the reins over to me. I’ve enjoyed page 5. Our PhD and Postdoc reps are working hard compound eye (green) is putting together this years’ newsletter. It’s been great to make the event bigger and better for next year! The composed of several hundred simple units called ommatidia to hear what our members have been up to, and I social events were well attended including the now arranged in an extremely hope you will enjoy reading it. infamous annual “Pub Quiz” and disco after the regular array. The giant conference dinner. Members will be relieved to know polyploidy cells of the fat body (red), the fly equivalent of the The 2016 BSCB/DB spring meeting, organised by our we aren’t including any photos from that here. mammalian liver and adipose committee members Buzz Baum (UCL), Silke tissue, occupy a big area of the Robatzek and Steve Royle, had a particular focus on In this issue, we highlight the great work the BSCB head. Cells and Tissue Architecture, Growth & Cell Division, has been doing to engage young scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Murine Homeobox Genes Anthony Graham
    ANALYSIS OF MURINE HOMEOBOX GENES ANTHONY GRAHAM Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Division of Eukaryotic Molecular Genetics National In s titu te fo r Medical Research The Ridgeway, M ill H ill London NW7 1AA Univeristy College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT November, 1989 ProQuest Number: 10611102 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10611102 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 This thesis is dedicated to my mother and father. i i The work in this thesis is original except where stated. The sequences used for comparisons in Chapter 3 were not determined by the author but were either from publications from other laboratories or from other members of the laboratory. Anthony Graham: ABSTRACT The work in this thesis is consistent with , and strengthens, suggestions that murine homeobox genes play a role in the establishment of regional specification. It is shown that there is a correlation between the physical order of members of the Hox 2 cluster and their order of expression along the rostrocaudal axis, such that each more 3' gene is expressed more rostrally.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspective Lecture, Frankfurt February 14Th 2013 Professor Paul
    Professor Paul Workman Bio: Perspective Lecture, Frankfurt February 14 th 2013 Professor Paul Workman – Short Biography Professor Paul Workman is a leader in the discovery and development of molecularly targeted cancer drugs and is a passionate advocate of personalized cancer therapy. A molecular pharmacologist and chemical biologist, Paul has been responsible for the discovery and development of a large number of new molecularly targeted cancer drugs. Paul is currently Deputy Chief Executive of The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) and Director of the ICR’s Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit in Sutton, UK, which is the largest non-profit cancer drug discovery group worldwide. He is also Head of ICR’s Division of Cancer Therapeutics and Harrap Professor of Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Paul obtained his BSc (Hons) in Biochemistry from Leicester University (1973) and his PhD in Cancer Pharmacology from Leeds University (1977). He then moved to Cambridge to become a postdoctoral fellow and scientific staff member of the MRC Clinical Oncology Unit, MRC Centre, Cambridge University (1976-1990) where he established and led the cancer pharmacology group, making major contributions to drugs targeting tumour hypoxia. Following a period as UICC Visiting Fellow at Stanford University and SRI International, California (1989), Paul was appointed as Cancer Research Campaign Professor and Director of Laboratory Research in the Department of Medical Oncology, Beatson Laboratories, Glasgow University (1990-1993). Paul then gained experience in the pharmaceutical industry. From 1993-1997 Paul was Head of the Cancer Research Bioscience Section at AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, UK where he also initiated and led the strategic alliance with Sugen.
    [Show full text]
  • Feedback Interactions Between Cell–Cell Adherens Junctions and Cytoskeletal Dynamics in Newt Lung Epithelial Cells□V Clare M
    Molecular Biology of the Cell Vol. 11, 2471–2483, July 2000 Feedback Interactions between Cell–Cell Adherens Junctions and Cytoskeletal Dynamics in Newt Lung Epithelial Cells□V Clare M. Waterman-Storer,*†‡ Wendy C. Salmon,†‡ and E.D. Salmon‡ *Department of Cell Biology and Institute for Childhood and Neglected Diseases, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037; and ‡Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 Submitted February 3, 2000; Revised April 20, 2000; Accepted May 11, 2000 Monitoring Editor: Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz To test how cell–cell contacts regulate microtubule (MT) and actin cytoskeletal dynamics, we examined dynamics in cells that were contacted on all sides with neighboring cells in an epithelial cell sheet that was undergoing migration as a wound-healing response. Dynamics were recorded using time-lapse digital fluorescence microscopy of microinjected, labeled tubulin and actin. In fully contacted cells, most MT plus ends were quiescent; exhibiting only brief excursions of growth and shortening and spending 87.4% of their time in pause. This contrasts MTs in the lamella of migrating cells at the noncontacted leading edge of the sheet in which MTs exhibit dynamic instability. In the contacted rear and side edges of these migrating cells, a majority of MTs were also quiescent, indicating that cell–cell contacts may locally regulate MT dynamics. Using photoactivation of fluorescence techniques to mark MTs, we found that MTs in fully contacted cells did not undergo retrograde flow toward the cell center, such as occurs at the leading edge of motile cells. Time-lapse fluorescent speckle microscopy of fluorescently labeled actin in fully contacted cells revealed that actin did not flow rearward as occurs in the leading edge lamella of migrating cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Situación Actual Y Perspectivas De Futuro Personalized Precision Oncology: Current Status and Future Perspectives Madrid, 21 Y 22 De Marzo / March 21-22, 2019
    Simposio Internacional International Symposium Oncología personalizada de precisión: situación actual y perspectivas de futuro Personalized Precision Oncology: current status and future perspectives Madrid, 21 y 22 de marzo / March 21-22, 2019 BIO Paul Workman Professor Paul Workman FMedSci, FRS is Chief Executive and President of The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR). Professor Workman is a passionate advocate of personalised molecular medicine and is an enthusiastic practitioner of multidisciplinary cancer drug discovery and development approaches to 'drugging the cancer genome'. He also conceptualised the 'Pharmacological Audit Trail' approach. As well as establishing and successfully leading drug discovery project teams yielding clinical candidates, Professor Workman’s personal and collaborative research utilises molecular pharmacology and chemical biology approaches, including high-throughput and genome-wide as well as hypothesis- driven strategies, to interrogate cancer biology, identify and validate new drug targets, discover and develop chemical tools and drugs acting on these targets, identify predictive and mechanism of action biomarkers, and elucidate mechanisms of drug sensitivity of resistance. He is especially interested in exploiting the addictions, vulnerabilities and dependencies of cancer cells using a combination of small molecule tools and drugs alongside molecular genetic techniques. Professor Workman has successfully built a series of multidisciplinary drug discovery and development teams in the academic, large pharma and biotechnology company sectors. Through this experience he has been able to combine the best elements of each of these environments. He has been responsible for the discovery of a number of drug development candidates, including in particular pathfinding inhibitors of the HSP90 molecular chaperone and the PI3 kinase family of signalling enzymes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Genomic Analysis of Family Data Reveals Additional Genetic Effects On
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/106203; this version posted February 6, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Genomic analysis of family data reveals additional genetic effects on intelligence and personality W. David Hill1,2*†, Ruben C. Arslan3,4†, Charley Xia†5, Michelle Luciano1,2, Carmen Amador5, Pau Navarro5, Caroline Hayward5, Reka Nagy5, David J. Porteous1,6,8, Andrew M. McIntosh1,9, Ian J. Deary1,2, Chris S. Haley5,10, and Lars Penke1,3,4 1 Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK 2 Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK 3 Georg Elias Müller Institute of Psychology, Georg August University Göttingen, Germany 4 Leibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Göttingen, Germany 5 MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK 6 Generation Scotland, Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK 8 Medical Genetics Section, Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh 9 Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh EH10 5HF 10 The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK * Corresponding author † These authors contributed equally Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK, T: +44 (131) 650 8405, E: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/106203; this version posted February 6, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Historiography of Molecular Biology
    Reflections on the Historiography of Molecular Biology HORACE FREELAND JUDSON SURELY the time has come to stop applying the word revolution to the rise of new scientific research programmes. Our century has seen many upheavals in scientific ideas--so many and so varied that the notion of scientific revolution has been stretched out of shape and can no longer be made to cover the processes of change characteristic of most sciences these past hundred years. By general consent, two great research pro- grammes arising in this century stand om from the others. The first, of course, was the one in physics that began at the turn of the century with quantum theory and relativity and ran through the working out, by about 1930, of quantum mechanics in its relativistic form. The trans- formation in physics appears to be thoroughly documented. Memoirs and biographies of the physicists have been written. Interviewswith survivors have been recorded and transcribed. The history has been told at every level of detail and difficulty. The second great programme is the one in biology that had its origins in the mid-1930s and that by 1970 had reached, if not a conclusion, a kind of cadence--a pause to regroup. This is the transformation that created molecular biology and latter-day biochemistry. The writing of its history has only recently started and is beset with problems. Accounting for the rise of molecular biology began with brief, partial, fugitive essays by participants. Biographies have been written of two, of the less understood figures in the science, who died even as the field was ripening, Oswald Avery and Rosalind Franklin; other scientists have wri:tten their memoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers Will Be Uploaded in Due Course
    THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH BUSINESS FOR MEETING OF THE UNIVERSITY COURT to be held in the Raeburn Room, Old College on Monday, 9 December 2013 at 2.00 p.m. A buffet lunch will be available at 1.00 p.m. in the Lord Provost Elder Room, Old College This meeting of Court will be preceded by a presentation on the Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) delivered by Mrs Tracey Slaven, Deputy Secretary, Strategic Planning. A FORMAL BUSINESS 1. Minute of the meeting held on 4 November 2013 A1 2. Senate Assessor A2 B PRINCIPAL'S BUSINESS 1. Principal’s Communications B1 2. Vice-Principal update B2 C SUBSTANTIVE ITEMS 1. Report of the Finance and General Purposes Committee .1 Comments on the Report of the Central Management Group C1.1 .2 Report on Other Items C1.2 2. EUSA President’s Report C2 3. Risk Management Committee year end report C3 4. Risk Management – post year end Assurance Statement C4 5. Audit Committee Annual Report C5 6. Reports and Financial Statements .1 Annual Report and Accounts for year ended 31 July 2013 C6.1 .2 Letter of Representation C6.2 .3 Review of 2012/2013 Outturn versus Forecast C6.3 7. 2014-2017 Draft Outcome Agreement C7 8. Strategic Plan: Targets and KPIs Progress Report C8 9. Annual Review 2012-2013 C9 10. Report from Remuneration Committee C10 11. Report from Knowledge Strategy Committee C11 D ITEMS FOR FORMAL APPROVAL OR NOTE 1. Draft Resolutions D1 2. Risk Management Committee – Terms of Reference D2 3. Donations and Legacies D3 4.
    [Show full text]