(Universals) in Aristotle
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rethinking Universalism and Particularism in African Philosophy: Towards an Eclectic Approach by Mutshidzi Maraganedzha Supervisor: Prof Bernard Matolino This dissertation is submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy, in the School of Religion, Philosophy and Classics. College of Humanities, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg November 2019 Declaration The author declares that the content of this thesis is his work unless the contrary has been specifically indicated. This thesis has not been submitted in any form for any specific degree to any other university across the world. Citations, references and to a greater extend borrowed ideas are properly acknowledged within the text. Signed: __________________ _______________ Mutshidzi Maraganedzha Date Student No. 207505743 I declare that this work has been submitted with the approval of the University supervisor. Signed: __________________ _______________ Prof. Bernard Matolino Date School of Religion, Philosophy and Classics University of KwaZulu-Natal i Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my late father, Khamusi Samson Maraganedzha who passed-away at the beginning of my doctoral studies. ii Abstract The study focuses on the dispute between the universalists and particularists in the characterization of the nature of African philosophy. In African philosophy the debate is formulated as a dichotomy between the universalists and the particularists. At the center of this debate is the notion of ‘universal’ and its relationship to the particular. The universalists argue that the nature of (African) philosophy–its methodology and subject matter–has to be universal and should be the same when applied to Western and African thought systems. In essence, the universalist thesis holds that African philosophy should be critical and not descriptive of African beliefs. Nevertheless, against this universalist thesis, the particularist camp argues that different cultures have different ways of explaining reality. Hence, Africans must have a philosophy different from other philosophies. It is evident from the foregoing that there is an impasse between the universalists and particularists’ conception of the nature of philosophy. The study contends that the solution to the impasse lies on investigating the true nature of ‘universal’ as it is at the center of the debate. The researcher is of the opinion that there is a need to go past the philosophical universalism as it neglects the true nature of universals. Consequently, there is a need for an alternative nature of (African) philosophy hinged on acknowledging that the nature of ‘universal’ is dependent on the ‘particular’ but not independent of its ‘particular’. It is argued that the viable and robust nature of (African) philosophy and what African philosophers should aspire to, is premised on their humanity; being a member of particular group and still be a member of homo sapiens at large. Keywords: Universals, Particulars, Universalists, Particularists, Philosophy, the Problem of universals iii Acknowledgement I owe my gratitude to my mother; Ndishavhelafhi Alphosinah Mphaya. To my brother and sister; Dakalo and Phathutshedzo Maraganedzha for their support and encouragement throughout my study. My special thanks are extended to Colleagues; Dr Mostamai Molefe, Dr Jacek Brzozowski, and Dr Heidi L. Matisonn for their insightful comments of certain parts of the project. My special thanks are also extended to my friends; Sakhile Austin Nkosi, Ntokozo Horward Vundla, Warren Mushonga, Dr Simon M. Mankwinja and Lungelo Siphosethu Mbatha, who have a special place in my heart. Finally, I wish to thank my Supervisor Prof. Bernard Matolino for his professional guidance and unfailing support throughout the course of this project. I am grateful for his ability to politely provide the platform where I could share my frustrations and confusions. iv Table of Contents Declaration ........................................................................................................................... i Dedication ........................................................................................................................... ii Abstract.............................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgement .............................................................................................................. iv Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ v General Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One ...................................................................................................................... 10 Universalism and Particularism: Its Origin and Development .................................... 10 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Universals and particulars: A Brief History ................................................................... 11 1.2.1. Plato’s Theory of Forms ..................................................................................................................... 13 1.2.2. Aristotle on Plato’s Theory of Forms ........................................................................................... 18 1.3. The Development of the debate of Universals ................................................................ 23 1.3.1. Realism ...................................................................................................................................................... 27 1.3.2. Nominalism .............................................................................................................................................. 28 1.3.3. Conceptualism ........................................................................................................................................ 31 1.4. Family of Resemblance and Universalism ...................................................................... 32 1.5. The Problematization of the debate between Universalists and Particularists ........... 36 1.6. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 38 Chapter Two ...................................................................................................................... 41 The Classical debate between the Universalists and Particularists in African Philosophy.......................................................................................................................... 41 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 41 2.1. The Great Debate .............................................................................................................. 42 2.1.1. Two distinct Positions amongst philosophers who agree that African philosophy exists ...... 43 2.2. Criticisms against the Universalists Thesis ..................................................................... 67 2.3. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 70 Chapter Three ................................................................................................................... 71 v The Contemporary Debate on the Problem of Universals in African Philosophy: A Rejoinder ........................................................................................................................... 71 3. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 71 3.1. Is the Debate between the Universalists and Particularists about Methodology? ....... 73 3.2. The Contemporary debate on the Universal and Particular of Philosophy ................. 76 3.2.1. Emmanuel C. Eze on African and Analytical Philosophy ................................................... 77 3.2.1. Ward Jones on Universalism ........................................................................................................... 82 3.3. Conversational Philosophy ............................................................................................... 98 3.3.1 Debate on Philosophical Space ...................................................................................................... 100 3.4. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 102 Chapter Four ................................................................................................................... 104 The Concept of Philosophy: An Analysis of the debate in African Philosophy ........ 104 4. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 104 4.1. Inadequacy of Envisaging African Philosophy as purely Universal ........................... 106 4.2. Inadequacy of Envisaging African Philosophy as purely Particular .......................... 115 4.3. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 123 Chapter Five ...................................................................................................................