DOCSLIB.ORG

Kasese Town Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kasese Town Council KASESE TOWN COUNCIL Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Waste Composting Plant and Landfill for Kasese Town Council Prepar ed By: Enviro-Impact and Management Consults ST Public Disclosure Authorized Total Deluxe House, 1 Floor, Plot 29/33, Jinja Road P.O. Box 70360 Kampala, Tel: 41-345964, 31-263096, Fax: 41-341543 E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.enviro-impact.co.ug February 2007 Kasese Town Council PREPARERS OF THIS REPORT ENVIRO-IMPACT and MANAGEMENT CONSULTS was contracted by Kasese Town Council to undertake the Environmental impact Assessment study of the proposed Waste Composting Plant and Landfill, and prepare this EIS on their behalf. Below is the description of the lead consultants who undertook the study. Aryagaruka Martin BSc, MSc (Natural Resource Management) Team Leader ………………….. Otim Moses BSc, MSc (Industrial Chemistry/Environmental Systems Analysis and Management) …………………… Wilbroad Kukundakwe BSc Industrial Chemistry …………………… EIS Kasese Waste Site i EIMCO Environmental Consultants Kasese Town Council TABLE OF CONTENTS PREPARERS OF THIS REPORT ........................................................................................................I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................................. V ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ......................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...............................................................................................................VI 1.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE EIA............................................ 2 1.3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 Document Review............................................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Site Visits and Observation ............................................................................... 3 1.3.3 Questionnaire....................................................................................................... 4 1.3.4 Public Consultations ........................................................................................... 4 1.3.5 Expert and Scientific Data Analysis................................................................ 5 1.3.6 The Consulting Team .......................................................................................... 5 1.4 STRUCTURE OF THIS EIS.................................................................................................... 5 2.0 POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ................................................ 6 2.1 POLICIES...................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 THE LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ..................................................... 6 2.2.1 The Uganda Constitution (1995) ...................................................................... 6 2.2.2 The National Environment Act (1995) and Regulations ............................ 7 2.2.3 The Town and Country Planning Act 1964.................................................... 8 2.2.4 The Public Health Act ......................................................................................... 8 2.2.5 The Water Act Cap. 152..................................................................................... 9 2.2.6 The Uganda Wildlife Act Cap 200................................................................... 9 2.2.7 The Local Governments Act, 1997.................................................................. 9 2.3 INSTITUTIONS.................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 Ministry Of Water Lands And Environment.................................................... 9 2.3.2 National Environment Management Authority ........................................... 9 2.3.3 The Uganda Land Commission...................................................................... 10 2.3.4 The Town and Country Planning Board ....................................................... 10 2.3.5 The District Land Board..................................................................................... 10 2.3.6 Kasese Town Council ....................................................................................... 10 3.0 PROJECT SITE ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE CONDITIONS.................................... 11 3.1 THE PROJECT AREA ...................................................................................................... 11 3.2 GEOLOGY AND SOILS................................................................................................... 12 3.3 GEOMORPHOLOGY AND DRAINAGE ........................................................................... 14 3.4 CLIMATE....................................................................................................................... 14 3.5 VEGETATIVE COVER ..................................................................................................... 14 3.7 WATER SOURCES .................................................................................................................. 14 3.8 SOCIAL BASELINE.................................................................................................................. 15 3.8.1 Land Tenure and Existing Land Use .............................................................. 15 3.8.2 Population and administrative structure..................................................... 15 3.8.3 Administrative structure................................................................................... 15 3.8.4 Economic Activity ............................................................................................. 16 EIS Kasese Waste Site ii EIMCO Environmental Consultants Kasese Town Council 3.8.5 Human Settlements and Housing.................................................................. 16 3.8.7 Social Services and Physical Infrastructure................................................ 16 3.9 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN KASESE TOWN COUNCIL .................................................... 17 3.9.1 Solid Waste generation and collection ........................................................... 17 3.9.2 CURRENT USES OF ORGANIC WASTE .................................................................................. 18 4.0 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS AND WASTE DISPOSAL ALTERNATIVES................ 19 4.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 19 4.2 WASTE SITE DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS............................................................................. 20 4.2.1 The NO ACTION Option.................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 The Open Dump Option................................................................................... 21 4.2.3 Development of a SANITARY LANDFILL Option.......................................... 22 4.2.4 Waste composting alongside landfilling......................................................... 22 4.2.5 Energy generation alongside landfilling ......................................................... 23 4.3 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................................................... 23 4.3.1 Area Hydro-geology in design considerations;............................................ 23 4.3.2 Design and operations of the composting plant .......................................... 24 4.3.3 Construction of the Storm Water Drainage System ...................................... 25 4.3.4 Vermin and litter control...................................................................................... 25 4.3.5 Record Keeping and waste information system........................................... 26 4.3.6 Site Security............................................................................................................. 26 4.3.7 Connecting the Site to Electricity And Piped Water..................................... 26 4.3.8 Site landscaping .................................................................................................... 26 4.3.9 Site Restoration....................................................................................................... 26 4.3.10 Gas Control Systems........................................................................................... 27 4.3.11 Fire control............................................................................................................. 27 4.3.12 Construction Of The Office Block/Reception Facilities ............................. 27 4.3.13 Construction Of Access Road, Weighbridge, Washing Bay .................... 27 5.0 STRATEGY FOR IMPROVED WASTE MANAGEMENT .............................................. 28 5.1 PRIORITY INITIATIVES .............................................................................................................. 28 5.1.1 Integrated waste management planning .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kilembe Hospital to Re-Open Today Rumours on ADF Lt
    WESTERN NEWS NEW VISION, Tuesday, June 4, 2013 9 UPDF dismisses Kilembe Hospital to re-open today rumours on ADF Lt. Ninsima Rwemijuma, the By JOHN THAWITE He disclosed that the 84 nurses are homeless after the untreated water from Uganda People’s Defence hospital would start by offering their houses were washed the Kasese Cobalt Company Forces second divison Kilembe Mines Hospital in services such as anti-retroviral Faulty away by the floods. factory. We have to purify spokesperson, has warned Kasese district re-opens its therapy, eye treatment, dental He requested for cement, it before using and it is not politicians in the Rwenzori gates to out-patients today, care, orthopaedics and timber and paint to be used enough for a big patient region against spreading after a month’s closure. immunisation. Dr. Edward Wefula, in repairing the hospital’s population,” Wefula added. rumours that Allied Democratic The facility was closed after Wefula said the 200-bed the superintendent of infrastructure. The hospital is co-managed Forces(ADF) rebels have it was ravaged by floods that hospital was not yet ready for Kilembe Mines Hospital, Wefula said the break down by Kilembe Mines, the Catholic crossed into Uganda. He said hit the area on May 1. in-patient admissions and said the sewerage system in the facility’s sewerage Church and the health such people want to disrupt “The out-patient department major surgical operations in the facility was down system had resulted in the ministry. peace. Ninsiima said according is ready to resume services. because most of the essential contamination of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Health
    UGANDA PROTECTORATE Annual Report of the MINISTRY OF HEALTH For the Year from 1st July, 1960 to 30th June, 1961 Published by Command of His Excellency the Governor CONTENTS Page I. ... ... General ... Review ... 1 Staff ... ... ... ... ... 3 ... ... Visitors ... ... ... 4 ... ... Finance ... ... ... 4 II. Vital ... ... Statistics ... ... 5 III. Public Health— A. General ... ... ... ... 7 B. Food and nutrition ... ... ... 7 C. Communicable diseases ... ... ... 8 (1) Arthropod-borne diseases ... ... 8 (2) Helminthic diseases ... ... ... 10 (3) Direct infections ... ... ... 11 D. Health education ... ... ... 16 E. ... Maternal and child welfare ... 17 F. School hygiene ... ... ... ... 18 G. Environmental hygiene ... ... ... 18 H. Health and welfare of employed persons ... 21 I. International and port hygiene ... ... 21 J. Health of prisoners ... ... ... 22 K. African local governments and municipalities 23 L. Relations with the Buganda Government ... 23 M. Statutory boards and committees ... ... 23 N. Registration of professional persons ... 24 IV. Curative Services— A. Hospitals ... ... ... ... 24 B. Rural medical and health services ... ... 31 C. Ambulances and transport ... ... 33 á UGANDA PROTECTORATE MINISTRY OF HEALTH Annual Report For the year from 1st July, 1960 to 30th June, 1961 I.—GENERAL REVIEW The last report for the Ministry of Health was for an 18-month period. This report, for the first time, coincides with the Government financial year. 2. From the financial point of view the year has again been one of considerable difficulty since, as a result of the Economy Commission Report, it was necessary to restrict the money available for recurrent expenditure to the same level as the previous year. Although an additional sum was available to cover normal increases in salaries, the general effect was that many economies had to in all be made grades of staff; some important vacancies could not be filled, and expansion was out of the question.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of the Ebola Virus Disease Preparedness in Uganda
    HIGHLIGHTS OF THE EBOLA VIRUS DISEASE PREPAREDNESS IN UGANDA 21st MAY 2019 (12:00 HRS) – UPDATE NO 118 SITUATION UPDATE FROM DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO FOR 20th MAY 2019 WITH DATA UP TO 19th MAY 2019 Cumulative cases: 1,826 Confirmed cases: 1,738 Probable: 88 Total deaths: 1,218 a) EVD SITUATIONAL UPDATE IN UGANDA There is NO confirmed EVD case in Uganda. Active case search continues in all communities, health facilities and on formal and informal border crossing in all districts especially in the high-risk ones. Alert cases continue to be picked, isolated, treated and blood samples picked for testing by the Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI). The alerts are highlighted in the specific district reports below under the Surveillance section. b) PREPAREDNESS IN THE FIELD (PROGRESS AND GAPS) COORDINATION SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES Kasese District Achievements Two (2) suspected cases from Kyaka II Camp were detected, samples were picked and taken to Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI) for testing. 32 school zonal leaders were trained on chlorine preparation at the district headquarters. Gaps and Challenges 1 There is lack of EVD logistics such as gloves, infrared thermometers, batteries, triple packing etc. Ntoroko District Achievements Support supervision was conducted at PoEs in the district. Surveillance team visited Stella Maris HCIII and MTI facilities where they updated staff and volunteers on EVD. Number of people screened at PoEs in Ntoroko District on 20th May 2019. No PoE site No of persons screened 1 Kigungu 34 2 Ntoroko Main 67 3 Fridge 0 4 Transami 153 5 Kanara 0 6 Rwagara 258 7 Katanga 56 8 Kamuga 99 9 Katolingo 24 10 Mulango 43 11 Rwentuhi 65 12 Haibale South 57 13 Kabimbiri 0 14 Kyapa 53 15 Kayanja I 31 16 Kayanja II 69 17 Budiba 0 2 Total 1,009 Gaps and Challenges Some PoEs have no tents.
    [Show full text]
  • MAUL Bulletin, We Share with You a Detailed
    MAUL July 2020 BULLETIN Volume 3 Issue 2 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Hello, • Support to National Response and Relief Ef- forts in Combating COVID-19 Enhancing human health involves the use of innovative ap- • Emergency Delivery of Medicines to Kilembe proaches and best practices to procure and deliver medi- Mines Hospital Amid Flash Floods cines and health commodities to patients when and where • Logistics Team in Action During the COVID- they need them the most. However, with the emergence of 19 Pandemic the COVID-19 pandemic, we have had to find new and in- • Procurement Agency: Mitigating Sourcing Risk During COVID-19 novative ways to ensure an uninterrupted supply of medi- • CDC & Implementing Partner Communica- cines to over 240,000 people. We implemented a business tors’ Meeting continuity plan that aimed at keeping staff safe while ensur- • Working From Home: Joseph’s Experience ing continuity of procurement, supply chain and health sys- • COVID-19 Pandemic: Our Response & Inno- tems strengthening operations to avert treatment interrup- vation tions for the people that need the medicines the most. • COVID-19 Training: Infection Prevention and Use of Virtual Working Applications Through the MAUL bulletin, we share with you a detailed insight into how we have been able to continue our opera- EDITORIAL TEAM tions running sustainably, keeping our staff and the wider • Arthur Muwanga community safe while delivering on our commitment of en- • Sheba Nakimera suring access to life-saving medicines to all that need them. • Josephine Tamale • EmmaLinda Nassali Cheers! 1 SUPPORT TO THE NATIONAL RESPONSE & RELIEF EFFORTS IN COMBATING COVID-19 Medical Access Uganda Limited (MAUL) donated managing the current COVID-19 crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Observations on the Relationship Between Serum Mitochondrial Aspartate Transaminase and Parasitic Infection
    FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SERUM MITOCHONDRIAL ASPARTATE TRANSAMINASE AND PARASITIC INFECTION. UNEXPECTED ABSENCE OF HUMAN SCHISTOSOMIASIS AROUND LAKES GEORGE AND EDWARD (UGANDA) T.R.C. Boyde Biochemistry Department, University of Hong Kong. ~d J.D. Gatenby Davies, Nairobi Laboratories, Nairobi, Kenya. ABSTRACT 1) Contrary to prediction, no cases of schistosomiasis could be detected in two lakeside communities. 2) Serum levels of mitochondrial aspart'ate tr~saminase (mAAT) in these communities were apparently unrelated to the presence or ,absence of detectable malaria parasites .. 3) By contrast, serum mAAT was significantly raised in 3 'healthy' cases of schistosomiasis who were otherwise comparable with the lakeside dwellers. (Significance was reached notwithstanding the paucity of cases). 4) These observations should be extended especially in respect of the Asian region where different species of Schistosoma are i~volved in para• sitisation, but progress has been blocked by lack of finance. INfRODUCTION Ongom and Bradley (1) studied a community living beside the Nile at Panyagoro, West Nile (Uganda) and found ~ extremely high level of infection with Schistosoma m~soni. They suggested that communities living in similar conditions elsewhere, including specifically t~~ area of the study reported here, would be found to have similar para?ite loads. The Hippopotamus population of Lakes George and Edward is infected with parasites of the same genus (2,3) ~d carrier snails of an appropriate species are present (4). Nevertheless, m~y Uganda residents believed that these lakes were safe and it therefore seemed worth determining what the prevalence really was, for reasons both of scientific and local public health interest.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/21 Half Year Impact Report
    2020/21 | Half Year IMPACT REPORT It seems such an understatement to say that 2020 was a worked well together and have strengthened our ability year that changed the world. The global pandemic has to support communities. Above all, they have kept the challenged health systems, thrown economies into chaos lifesaving oxygen flowing. and disrupted even the best laid plans - unfortunately FREO2 was no exception. On the local front, we’ve reorganised ourselves internally with a clear focus on accountability for scalability. We Our plans to mobilise in-country were hampered by our have our go-to market strategy and business model, inability to travel, our manufacturing facility in Germany ready to be ratified by the board. We have a clear plan ceased production and access to our labs in Melbourne to realise our social enterprise model. We have created was hindered. Yet, a crisis can also provide an new foundational business capabilities in operations, opportunity to move ahead. marketing and donor engagement. We are very excited about the calibre of people who have joined the team We are pleased to report that despite these setbacks throughout the year. we’ve made significant progress across many facets of the foundation during the year. This was largely driven And what an amazing Christmas present we received. by a decision to pivot our strategy to focus on After many years of hard work, our first child was opportunities that were within our control. treated with oxygen from the FREO2-Siphon in Bugoye (Western Uganda), literally on Christmas Day! This is an Embracing the spirit of sharing, we concentrated on in- important milestone and a world first; providing life country empowerment, building our foundational saving oxygen supplied from flowing water.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Associated with HIV Positive Sero-Status Among Exposed Infants
    Kahungu et al. BMC Public Health (2018) 18:139 DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5024-6 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Factors associated with HIV positive sero-status among exposed infants attending care at health facilities: a cross sectional study in rural Uganda Methuselah Muhindo Kahungu*, Julius Kiwanuka, Frank Kaharuza and Rhoda K. Wanyenze Abstract Background: East and South Africa contributes 59% of all pediatric HIV infections globally. In Uganda, HIV prevalence among HIV exposed infants was estimated at 5.3% in 2014. Understanding the remaining bottlenecks to elimination of mother-to-child transmission (eMTCT) is critical to accelerating efforts towards eMTCT. This study determined factors associated with HIV positive sero-status among exposed infants attending mother-baby care clinics in rural Kasese so as to inform enhancement of interventions to further reduce MTCT. Methods: This was a cross-sectional mixed methods study. Quantitative data was derived from routine service data from the mother’s HIV care card and exposed infant clinical chart. Key informant interviews were conducted with health workers and in-depth interviews with HIV infected mothers. Quantitative data was analyzed using Stata version 12. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with HIV sero-status. Latent content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. Results: Overall, 32 of the 493 exposed infants (6.5%) were HIV infected. Infants who did not receive ART prophylaxis at birth (AOR = 4.9, 95% CI: 1.901–13.051, p=0.001) and those delivered outside of a health facility (AOR = 5.1, 95% CI: 1.038 – 24.742, p = 0.045) were five times more likely to be HIV infected than those who received prophylaxis and those delivered in health facilities, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Alkaline Peptone Water Enrichment with a Dipstick Test to Quickly Detect
    Bwire et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2017) 17:726 DOI 10.1186/s12879-017-2824-8 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Alkaline peptone water enrichment with a dipstick test to quickly detect and monitor cholera outbreaks Godfrey Bwire1* , Christopher Garimoi Orach2, Dauda Abdallah3, Amanda Kay Debes4, Atek Kagirita5, Malathi Ram4 and David A. Sack4 Abstract Background: Detection, confirmation and monitoring of cholera outbreaks in many developing countries including Uganda is a big challenge due to lack of the required resources and the time the test takes. Culture method which takes 24–48 h to get the feedback and requires highly skilled laboratory staff plus other complex resources is the standard test. This study evaluated the new cholera rapid detection method that relies on Crystal VC dipsticks after enrichment with alkaline peptone water (APW) against the culture method for monitoring the progress of cholera outbreaks in rural setting. Methods: We conducted the study between March and June 2015. Fresh stool samples and rectal swabs were incubated in 1% APW for 6 h at room temperature before testing with RDT following the manufacturer’s instruction. The same stool sample was cultured to isolate V. cholerae in the standard manner. We also reviewed patient registers to epidemiologically describe the cholera epidemic. Results: We tested stool from 102 consenting suspected cholera patients reporting during daytime at Bwera Hospital (n = 69), Kilembe Mines Hospital (n = 4) and Kinyabwama Health Centre (n = 29). Ninety one (91) samples were positive and nine samples were negative according to both methods. One (1) sample was positive only by dipstick and one sample was positive only by culture (sensitivity of 99%, specificity of 90%, Positive Predictive Value of 99% and Negative Predictive Value of 90%).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Authorised Facilities As of 30/1/2019
    LIST OF AUTHORISED FACILITIES AS OF 30/1/2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Atomic Energy Council is a body corporate established by the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), 2008, Act No.24, Cap.143 Laws of Uganda to regulate the peaceful applications of ionising radiation, to provide for the protection and safety of individuals, society and the environment from the dangers resulting from ionising radiation. Section 32 (1) of Atomic Energy Act No. 24 of 2008 requires facilities with practices involving ionizing radiation not to acquire, own, possess, operate, import, export, hire, loan, receive, use, install, commission, decommission, transport, store, sell, distribute, dispose of, transfer, modify, upgrade, process, manufacture or undertake any practice related to the application of atomic energy unless permitted by an authorization from Atomic Energy Council. # Facility Name Type of status District Licensed Machine/ License Number Date of Date of Facility radioactive sources Issue Expiry 1. Abii Clinic Medical Private Kampala Dental X-ray (OPG) AEC/PU/1409 11/04/2017 10/04/2019 Fixed X-ray AEC/PU/1090/02 25/01/2018 24/01/2020 Fixed Dental X-ray AEC/PU/1265/01 30/4/2018 29/4/2020 2. Abubaker Technical Services and Industrial Private Mukono 1 Nuclear gauge AEC/PU/1323/01 04/10/2018 03/10/2020 General Supplies Limited 3. Adjumani General Hospital Medical Government Adjumani Fixed X-ray AEC/PU/1515 17/11/2017 16/11/2019 4. AFYA Medical & Diagnostic Centre Medical Private Kasese AEC/PU/1024/03 18/12/2018 17/12/2020 5. Agakhan University Hospital-Acacia Medical Private Kampala Fixed Dental X-ray AEC/PU/1229/01 23/01/2018 22/01/2020 Medical Centre Fixed X-ray AEC/PU/1134/02 10/10/2018 09/10/2020 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Vote: 521 Kasese District Structure of Budget Estimates - PART ONE
    Local Government Budget Estimates Vote: 521 Kasese District Structure of Budget Estimates - PART ONE A: Overview of Revenues and Expenditures B: Detailed Estimates of Revenue C: Detailed Estimates of Expenditure D: Status of Arrears Page 1 Local Government Budget Estimates Vote: 521 Kasese District A: Overview of Revenues and Expenditures Revenue Performance and Plans 2015/16 2016/17 Approved Budget Receipts by End Approved Budget March UShs 000's 1. Locally Raised Revenues 847,057 1,038,658 1,401,377 2a. Discretionary Government Transfers 5,267,405 4,211,675 4,158,655 2b. Conditional Government Transfers 38,635,088 27,179,682 41,770,977 2c. Other Government Transfers 2,210,795 1,880,557 1,315,751 4. Donor Funding 873,833 528,317 2,031,655 Total Revenues 47,834,178 34,838,889 50,678,415 Expenditure Performance and Plans 2015/16 2016/17 Approved Budget Actual Approved Budget Expenditure by UShs 000's end of March 1a Administration 1,288,768 1,808,819 3,768,894 2 Finance 751,860 916,423 499,438 3 Statutory Bodies 4,261,152 1,451,926 735,036 4 Production and Marketing 1,399,865 977,066 1,122,417 5 Health 8,514,824 6,773,160 9,290,921 6 Education 26,469,655 19,373,505 28,862,738 7a Roads and Engineering 1,965,304 1,051,477 2,829,413 7b Water 656,999 545,523 839,466 8 Natural Resources 500,032 385,301 510,202 9 Community Based Services 1,326,135 603,224 1,846,764 10 Planning 570,480 376,010 240,142 11 Internal Audit 129,103 93,735 132,984 Grand Total 47,834,178 34,356,168 50,678,415 Wage Rec't: 29,569,412 23,233,763 32,241,830 Non Wage Rec't: 13,306,162 8,220,260 12,327,337 Domestic Dev't 4,084,771 2,414,730 4,077,593 Donor Dev't 873,833 487,414 2,031,655 Page 2 Local Government Budget Estimates Vote: 521 Kasese District B: Detailed Estimates of Revenue 2015/16 2016/17 UShs 000's Approved Budget Receipts by End Approved Budget of March 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Illness Management Support Final Report July 2015
    Severe Illness Management Support Final Report July 2015 1 Introduction Beginning in July 2014, Walimu implemented the Severe Illness Management Support (SIMS) project in four facilities, Bwera Hospital, Kagando Hospital, Kilembe Mines Hospital and St. Paul Health Centre IV (HCIV), in Kasese District, Uganda. The project aimed to improve triage, emergency care and care for the severely ill, with an emphasis on HIV-infected patients. A private foundation (64% of total funds), and the IMAI-IMCI Alliance (36% of total funds) provided the initial project funding, through April 2015. With remaining funds and additional support from the World Health Organization, the program has been extended through July 2015. 1.2 SIMS Approach SIMS grew from a simple observation: in low-income countries, most patients die of curable conditions because they are not identified and treated early enough. Often the essential resources to care for patients exist, but the necessary systems and provider behaviors for appropriately treating patients are missing. Drawing on a strong peer-reviewed evidence base which demonstrates that training alone is insufficient to change behaviors and systems, SIMS is a multi-pronged post-training quality improvement program designed to follow the WHO IMAI Quick Check+ (QC+) training course in triage, emergency care and management of the severely ill. SIMS includes five components 1) development of a hospital improvement plan and bi-weekly collaborative improvement meetings for an implementing team at the hospital; 2) data audit on vital signs measurement and severe illness management to provide a reliable metric of progress; 3) on-site mentoring by clinical experts and support-supervision visits by a program manager; 4) provision of essential equipment, including vital signs monitoring tools and oxygen equipment; and 5) access to guidelines on patient management, via mobile devices and print materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement to Parliament on the Damage Caused by Heavy Rains in the Country
    OFTICE OT THE PRIME MIHISTER STATEMENT TO PARLIAMENT ON THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY HEAVY RAINS IN THE COUNTRY BY ENG. HTLARY ONEK (MP) MINISTER FOR RELI ]SASTER PREPAREDNE$S 26TH MAY 2O2A 1. O INTRODUCTION The 54th Greater Horn of Africa Climate Outlook Forum (GHACOF) convened in late January predicted that most parts of the country will receive normal to above normal rainfall between March and May. The recent forecast indicates that rains will continue into June and recede in early July. The impact of the current rains is already being felt in Uganda. The country is experiencing rising water levels and subsequent flooding of its major water bodies. The water levels in L. Victoria alone have reached the highest levels in our history. The release of water at the dam to downstream has been increased to 200,000 cubic centimeters threatening to flood the infrastructure and low lying areas of Lake Kyoga, 2. O EFFECTS OF HEAVY RAINS TO THE COUNTRY Water levels have increased in all rivers and lakes in the country leading to floods and dhplacement of communities. Somd of the districts affected by this phenomenon include communities along the shores of the lakes including L. Albert that has affected the districts of Buliisa, Hoima, Kikuube Kagadi, L" Kyoga ndd isplaced communities , Serere, Ka of Lango. affected Wakiso, including Bussi Islands where 55 houses were destroyed. Entebbe particularly along the shores including Garuga and Mulungu in Busiro have experienced floods. Kampala District has equally suffered floods especially communities along of L. Victoria that include; Bukasa, Mutungo, Gaba, Munyonyo, of the Islands within L if the rains persist.
    [Show full text]