Lily Register & Checklist
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
The International Lily Register & Checklist (2007) Fifth Supplement © 2017 The Royal Horticultural Society 80 Vincent Square, London SW1P 2PE, United Kingdom www.rhs.org.uk Charity registration number 222879 / SC038262 International Registrar: Duncan Donald E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright holder isbn 9781907057748 Printed and bound in the UK by Page Bros, Norwich The previous supplement (Fourth Supplement) was published on 11 February 2014. Cover: Lilium ‘Willcrovidii’; drawing of Award of Merit plant by Winifred Walker, 1932. Image courtesy of RHS Herbarium, Wisley The International Lily Register and Checklist 2007 Fifth Supplement Introduction page 1 Notes on the entries page 2 Horticultural classification page 3 Register and Checklist, Sep 2012–Aug 2014 page 5 Hybridizers, registrants and others page 108 The lily epithets listed here were registered between The Royal Horticultural Society is indebted to the 1 September 2012 and 31 August 2014. Details of following Regional Representatives for their efforts lilies with unregistered names are published also, as a to encourage the registration of lily names and for Checklist. contributing amendments to The International Lily Epithets which conformed to the Articles (and, Register and Checklist and its Supplements: ideally, Recommendations) of the 2009 edition of the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Australia Plants (ICNCP) were deemed acceptable for Mr Neil Jordan, 27 Scarfe Street, registration. Although registration is a voluntary Camdale, Tasmania 7320 procedure and does not confer any legal protection E-mail: [email protected] on the plant, the Royal Horticultural Society – as International Cultivar Registration Authority for Czech Republic Lilium – urges all hybridizers, raisers and introducers Ing. Břetislav Mičulka, 687 07 Velehrad 225 to register their lily names, to minimize potential E-mail: [email protected] confusion caused by new epithets the same as, or very similar to, existing names. Registration, for which a The Netherlands certificate can be issued on request, is free of charge, Mrs Saskia Bodegom, Koninklijke Algemeene and should take place before a plant is released or Vereeniging voor Bloembollencultuur, described in a catalogue. Postbus 175, 2180 AD Hillegom Registration forms are available from www.rhs. E-mail: [email protected] org.uk/Plants/Plant-science/Plant-registration, as an online download; from Duncan Donald New Zealand (International Registrar) at c/o RHS Garden Wisley, formerly Woking, Surrey GU23 6QB, UK(tel. +44(0)1445 Mrs Merle I. Lepper, PO Box 1394, Christchurch 781717 or e-mail: lilyregistrar@rhs. org.uk); and E-mail: [email protected] from the Regional Representatives listed (right). latterly Mrs Claire Patten, 40 Macdonald’s Road, Christchurch 8051 Russia Dr Alex Otroshko, 2-Pugachiovskaja, Moscow 107061, Russia E-mail: [email protected] International Lily Register & Checklist 2007 5th Supplement 1 Notes on the entries Registrar’s notes The format of entries is similar to the layout adopted Duncan Donald (International Registrar for lilies for The International Lily Register and Checklist 2007. since October 2009) would like to thank all registrants for having volunteered information in Parentage timely fashion, and Saskia Bodegom at KAVB in Where known, the seed parentage is given first. particular for her continuing support and advice Where the seed parent is unknown, the parents are regarding Dutch lilies. It has been pleasing to see a given in alphabetical order. The hybrid sign × growing number of Chinese and Russian cultivars separates the two parents; if a parent is itself a cross, being registered (see table, below); further work is the hybrid parent is enclosed in parentheses, e.g. needed to ensure that new cultivars from Japan, (‘Peachwood’ × ‘Cherrywood’) and, where necessary Korea and North America are added. for clarity, a larger multiplication sign × may be used to distinguish between parental formulae, e.g. ‘Foggy Summary of registrations per country Morning’ × (‘Peachwood’ × ‘Cherrywood’). September 2012 to August 2014 Roles The Netherlands 152 The sequence and explanation of the abbreviations Russia 71 is as follows: China 47 S: Selected by Canada 15 H: Hybridizer Australia 7 G: Grown to first flowering by Germany 7 N: Named by USA 7 I: Introduced by Czech Republic 4 REG: Registrant UK 2 Korea 1 Colour Latvia 1 Numbers and letters in parentheses refer to the RHS New Zealand 1 Colour Chart (1966 (reprinted 1986), 1995, 2001, 2007 and 2015). A colour name preceding a Colour • Further information to augment existing lily Chart reference is taken from A Contribution toward records is always welcome. Standardization of Color Names in Horticulture: Application of the Universal Color Language to the Colors of the Royal Horticultural Society’s Colour Chart by R.D. Huse and K.L. Kelly (ed. D.H. Voss; The American Rhododendron Society, 1984). Nomenclatural Standard Sharp colour images, clearly showing the characteristics of the plant(s), and/or, if practicable, pressed specimens, are very helpful and greatly appreciated. These, with the completed form, constitute a permanent, definitive record (nomenclatural standard) of the cultivar or Group. Those held in the RHS Herbarium at RHS Garden Wisley are under a designated WSY reference number. Non-Roman scripts Where epithets have been transliterated from non- Roman alphabetic scripts or transcribed from non- alphabetic scripts (e.g. Japanese Katakana characters), the original scripts have been included in the notes where possible. 2 International Lily Register & Checklist 2007 5th Supplement canadense, columbianum, grayi, humboldtii, kelleyanum, Horticultural classification kelloggii, maritimum, michauxii, michiganense, occidentale, × pardaboldtii, pardalinum, parryi, Division I Asiatic hybrids parvum, philadelphicum, superbum and Hybrids derived from the following species and washingtonianum. interspecific hybrids:amabile , bulbiferum, Flowers small to medium-sized, mostly down- callosum, cernuum, concolor, dauricum, davidii, facing. Flower colour often strong yellow to orange or × hollandicum, lancifolium (syn. tigrinum), orange-red, often with contrasting centre and tepal lankongense, leichtlinii, × maculatum, pumilum, tips. Brushmarks absent. Spots often very × scottiae, wardii and wilsonii. conspicuous, over at least half of each tepal, usually Flowers usually small to medium-sized; few to rounded and often surrounded by a paler halo. fairly numerous, bowl-shaped, flat or with tepals Papillae absent or inconspicuous. Buds usually recurved, usually with an open centre; up-, out- or without hairs. Flowers with little scent; tepals rather down-facing. Flower colour often uniform, or with narrow, margins smooth, tips usually gently to contrasting tepal tips and/or throat, occasionally with strongly reflexed; pedicels often long and slender. contrasting white tepal-margins. Conspicuous Leaves usually whorled, at least in part. Flowers often brushmarks sometimes present. Spots absent or, when in a pyramidal inflorescence. present, well-defined and often rounded. Papillae, if • Examples: Bellingham Group IV(c/d), ‘Lake Tulare’ present, usually inconspicuous. Nectaries relatively IV(c/c-d), ‘Shuksan’ IV(c/d). inconspicuous. Buds sometimes hairy. Tepal margins usually smooth or slightly ruffled. Flowers usually Division V Longiflorum lilies with little or no scent. inflorescence sometimes with Hybrids or selections derived exclusively from secondary buds. Conspicuous brushmarks sometimes formosanum, longiflorum, philippinense and present. Leaves scattered, of narrow to medium width. wallichianum. • Examples: ‘Ariadne’ I(c/d), Citronella Group I(c/d), Flowers medium-sized to large, often few, ‘Mont Blanc’ I(a/b-c). trumpet-shaped. Flower colour typically uniform internally (mainly white). Brushmarks, spots and Division II Martagon hybrids papillae absent. Flowers usually scented; tepal Hybrids of martagon type derived from the following margins smooth. Leaves scattered, of narrow to species and interspecific hybrids: ×dalhansonii, medium width. Inflorescence lacking secondary buds. hansonii, martagon, medeoloides and tsingtauense. • Examples: Formolongi Group V(-/a), longiflorum Flowers usually small, often numerous, mostly ‘Slocum’s Ace’ V(b/a). down-facing, typically with rather thick, recurved tepals and often of Turk’s cap form; sometimes out- Division VI Trumpet and Aurelian hybrids facing with tepals hardly recurved. Spots usually Hybrids derived from the following species and present, numerous, often on at least three-quarters of interspecific hybrids: ×aurelianense, brownii, each tepal and sometimes also on the edges of the × centigale, henryi, × imperiale, × kewense, leucanthum, outside. Flowers with little, or an unpleasant, scent; regale, rosthornii, sargentiae, sulphureum and tepal margins usually smooth. Buds often hairy. × sulphurgale (but excluding hybrids of henryi with all Leaves typically whorled, often rather broad. Flowers species listed in Division VII). Aurelian hybrids are often borne in narrow, cylindrical inflorescence. derived from a combination of henryi and trumpet Bulbs often mauve or orange-yellow. Early flowering. lilies. • Examples: ‘Cadense’ II(b/d), ‘Claude Shride’ II(c/d), Flowers