“A Clinical Study of Antimiasmatic Treatment on Patients with Haemorrhoids”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
“A CLINICAL STUDY OF ANTIMIASMATIC TREATMENT ON PATIENTS WITH HAEMORRHOIDS” A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF MEDICINE IN HOMOEOPATHY: M.D. (HOM.) IN ORGANON OF MEDICINE AND HOMOEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY By Dr. DIVYA PUSHPARAJ UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF Dr. MANOJ NARAYAN V., M.D. (HOM.) PROFESSOR DEPARTMENT OF ORGANON OF MEDICINE & HOMOEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY SARADA KRISHNA HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE, KULASEKHARAM, TAMILNADU. SUBMITTED TO THE TAMILNADU Dr. MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI. 2019 ENDORSEMENT BY THE HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT AND THE INSTITUTION This is to certify that the dissertation entitled, “A CLINICAL STUDY OF ANTIMIASMATIC TREATMENT ON PATIENTS WITH HAEMORRHOIDS” is a bonafide work carried out by Dr. DIVYA PUSHPARAJ, a student of M.D. (Hom.) in the DEPARTMENT OF ORGANON OF MEDICINE AND HOMOEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY in SARADA KRISHNA HOMOEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE under the supervision and guidance of Prof. Dr. MANOJ NARAYAN V., M.D. (Hom.), PROFESSOR, DEPT. OF ORGANON OF MEDICINE & HOMOEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY in partial fulfilment of the regulations for the award of the Degree of DOCTOR OF MEDICINE (HOMOEOPATHY) in ORGANON OF MEDICINE AND HOMOEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY. This work conforms to the standards prescribed by THE TAMILNADU DR. MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI. This has not been submitted in full or part for the award of any degree or diploma from any University. Dr. M. MURUGAN, M.D. (HOM.) Dr. N. V. SUGATHAN, M.D. (HOM.) Professor & Head, Principal Department of Organon of Medicine & Homoeopathic Philosophy Place: Kulasekharam Date: CERTIFICATE BY THE GUIDE This is to certify that the dissertation entitled, “A CLINICAL STUDY OF ANTIMIASMATIC TREATMENT ON PATIENTS WITH HAEMORRHOIDS” is a bonafide work of Dr. DIVYA PUSHPARAJ. All her work has been carried out under my direct supervision and guidance. Her approach to the subject has been sincere, scientific and analytic. This work is recommended for the award of degree of DOCTOR OF MEDICINE (HOMOEOPATHY) in ORGANON OF MEDICINE AND HOMOEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY of THE TAMILNADU DR. MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI. Place: Kulasekharam Date: Dr. MANOJ NARAYAN V., M. D. (Hom.) Prof. Dept. of Organon of Medicine & Homoeopathic Philosophy DECLARATION I, Dr. DIVYA PUSHPARAJ, do hereby declare that this dissertation entitled “A CLINICAL STUDY OF ANTIMIASMATIC TREATMENT ON PATIENTS WITH HAEMORRHOIDS” is a bonafide work carried out by me under the direct supervision and guidance of Dr. MANOJ NARAYAN V., M.D. (Hom.) PROFESSOR, DEPT. OF ORGANON OF MEDICINE & HOMOEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY, in partial fulfilment of the regulations for the award of degree of Doctor of Medicine (Homoeopathy) in ORGANON OF MEDICINE AND HOMOEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY of THE TAMIL NADU DR. MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, CHENNAI. This has not been submitted in full or part for the award of any degree or diploma from any University. Place: Kulasekharam Dr. DIVYA PUSHPARAJ Date: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Haemorrhoids or piles is one of the most common anorectal disease that have been nagging the mankind from ancient times. Haemorrhoids are rarely serious, but they can be extremely troublesome. Women are more commonly affected than males.. However haemorrhoids can be managed with homoeopathic medicine with antimiasmatic treatment. This study was done to evaluate the efficiency of homoeopathy in the treatment of haemorrhoids with antimiasmatic treatment. METHODS A clinical study on thirty cases with Haemorrhoids was taken for the study from the OPD, IPD and rural centers of Sarada Krishna Homoeopathic Medical College Hospital. The study cases were selected randomly as per the inclusion criteria and diagnosis was mainly based on the clinical presentation. Improvement criteria were based on the symptomatic relief according to score chart. RESULTS The result of this study showed that 28 (93%) cases were markedly improved and 2 (7%) cases showed mild improvement. The results are based on the statistical analysis of before and after treatment score. CONCLUSION The study resulted that antimiasmatic treatment is very effective in the treatment of patients with haemorrhoids. Homoeopathy treats the patient as a whole and it prevents the frequent recurrence of haemorrhoids and thus the quality of life can be improved. KEY WORDS: Haemorrhoids, Antimiasmatic treatment. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First and foremost I thank Almighty God for all the love and blessings that has been showed upon me from my birth. I acknowledge with deep sense of reverence to my family especially my father Mr. PUSHPARAJ K., my most lovable mother Mrs BEENA PUSHPARAJ, my dear sister DHANYA PUSHPARAJ for their love, care and prayers. I am grateful to my husband Dr. ABHIJITH RANJAN S., for his advice, encouragement, timely support and love. I would have never accomplished my goal without them. I remain indebted to them for everything I have and whatever I have achieved. I express my sincere thanks to my guide Dr. MANOJ NARAYAN V., M. D. (Hom.), Professor, Dept. of Organon of Medicine and Homoeopathic Philosophy for his valuable guidance, advice, supervision, motivation, and constant support throughout my course of study and dissertation work. It’s my good fortune to be his student and to do this work under his guidance. I owe my sincere thanks to Dr. M. MURUGAN, M.D. (Hom.), Professor and Head, Department of Organon of Medicine and Homoeopathic Philosophy for the valuable guidance, inspiration and assistance all along for the completion of my work. I convey my respectful regards to Dr. C. K. MOHAN, B.Sc., M.D. (Hom.), Chairman, for providing the opportunity to undertake this work and extending all necessary facilities to carry out the work. I am thankful to Dr. N. V. SUGATHAN, M.D. (Hom.), Principal and Medical Superintendent, for his guidance and support. My profound gratitude and deep regards to Dr. WINSTON VARGHEESE, M.D. (Hom.) PG co-ordinator who has always been a source of support and inspiration. I am grateful to all my honourable teachers in the various departments who whole heartedly encouraged and supported me at all times. I am grateful to Dr. Dhanya S. S., Dr. Riswana and Dr. Vaishali, Dr. Vipin Das, Dr. Arun Vivek, Dr. Tini, Dr. Geethi S Gopinath, Dr. Brigit Cherian, Dr.Fretty Paul, Dr. Suwaamynaathan, Dr. Dinu Satheesh for being helpful and supportive all through our long stay together. I extend my sincere gratitude to librarians, all my seniors, friends, colleagues and juniors whose co-operation and timely help to finish my task. Thanks to all my patients without whose help and co- operation this work could never have seen the light of the day. Dr. DIVYA PUSHPARAJ TABLE OF CONTENTS SL. NO CONTENTS PAGE NO 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. AIMS & OBJECTIVES 5 3. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 6 4. MATERIALS AND METHODS 31 5. OBSERVATION AND RESULTS 34 6. DISCUSSION 56 7. CONCLUSION 60 8. SUMMARY 62 9. BIBLIOGRAPHY 63 10. APPENDICES 69 LIST OF TABLES Table No. PARTICULARS Pg. No. 1. Distribution of cases according to age 34 2. Distribution of cases according to sex 36 3. Distribution of cases according to occupation 37 4. Distribution of cases according to family history 39 5. Distribution of cases according to dietary habits 41 6. Distribution of cases according to miasm 42 7. Distribution of cases according to medicines prescribed 43 8. Distribution of cases according to potency 45 Distribution of cases according to intensity scores of 9. 46 patients before and after treatment 10. Distribution of cases according to improvement status 46 11. Statistical analysis 52 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PARTICULARS Pg. No. NO 1. Distribution of cases according to age 35 2. Distribution of cases according to sex 36 3. Distribution of cases according to occupation 38 4. Distribution of cases according to family history 40 5. Distribution of cases according to dietary habits 41 6. Distribution of cases according to miasm 43 7. Distribution of cases according to medicines prescribed 44 8. Distribution of cases according to potency 45 Distribution of cases according to intensity scores of patients 9. 48 before and after treatment 10. Distribution of cases according to the improvement status 49 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED SL. NO. ABBREVIATION EXPANSION 1. & And 0 2. F Fahrenheit 3. A/F Ailments from 4. BP Blood Pressure 5. % Percentage 6. SL Saccharum Lactis 7. aph, § Aphorism 8. D Dose 9. eg. Example 10. No. Number 11. O/E On Examination 12. OPD Outpatient department 13. IPD In patient department 14. Yrs. Years 15. i.e. That is 16. M Male 17. F Female 18. ˂ Aggravation, more than 19. ˃ Amelioration, less than 20. BMI Body Mass Index 21. H/0 History of. LIST OF APPENDICES SL. NO: APPENDICES PAGE NO: 1. Appendix I – Glossary 69 2. Appendix II - Case Record Format 71 3. Appendix III – CORECT SCALE 81 4. Appendix IV - Case Record 82 5. Appendix V – Master Chart 110 6. Appendix VI - Consent form 114 IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn 1.1 INTRODUCTION Haemorrhoids remain the most common anorectal disorder which is frequently seen in primary care clinics, emergency wards, gastroenterology units and surgical clinics. The word haemorrhoid is derived from the Greek word “haema” means blood and “rhoos” means flowing, that means flow of blood from the veins of the anus. It was probably Buqrat (Hippocrates 460 BC) who was the first to apply this name to the flow of blood from the veins of anus. Commonly in society it is known as piles. The term piles was derived from the latin word “pila” (ball) or a mass. Haemorrhoids have plagued humankind since ancient times and might have even influenced world history. Haemorrhoidal disease is the consequence of distal displacement of anal cushions, which are normal structures with an important role in continence. (1) Haemorrhoids develop when the venous drainage of the anus is altered, causing the venous plexus and connecting tissue to dilate, creating an outgrowth of anal mucosa from the rectal wall.