DOCSLIB.ORG

New Zealand’S Sixth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Zealand’S Sixth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity New Zealand’s Sixth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity Reporting period: 2014–2018 Cover: View of Palliser Bay, looking west from Mt Surf, Aorangi Mountains, southern North Island, New Zealand. Photo: Joe Hansen. This document may be cited as: Department of Conservation 2019: New Zealand’s Sixth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. Reporting period: 2014–2018. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/countries/?country=nz. and https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/international-agreements/convention-on-biological-diversity/ ISBN (electronic) 978-1-98-851491-8 ISBN (print) 978-1-98-851492-5 Department of Conservation PO Box 10420 Wellington 6143 New Zealand This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. In essence, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to the Crown and abide by the other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE 6TH NATIONAL REPORT ........................................................................................................................ 5 1. PEOPLE’S LIVES ARE ENRICHED THROUGH CONNECTION TO NATURE ................................................................................ 7 I. General information .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 II. Implementation Measures ................................................................................................................................................ 7 a) Measure 1 – Environmental Education Strategy and Action Plan ..................................................................................................... 7 b) Measure 2 – Department of Conservation recreation programme ................................................................................................... 8 c) Measure 3 – Children involved in natural environment programmes through the Toyota Kiwi Guardians outreach programme ... 9 III. Assessment of Progress ................................................................................................................................................... 10 2. PEOPLE ARE TAKING GREATER ACTION FOR NATURE ....................................................................................................... 12 I. General information ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 II. Implementation Measures .............................................................................................................................................. 12 a) Measure 1 – Department of Conservation Community Fund ......................................................................................................... 12 b) Measure 2 – Voluntary Contributions to Conservation ................................................................................................................... 13 III. Assessment of Progress ................................................................................................................................................... 15 3. BIODIVERSITY IS INTEGRATED INTO NATIONAL AND LOCAL STRATEGIES, POLICIES, PLANS AND REPORTING .................. 16 I. General information ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 II. Implementation measures ............................................................................................................................................... 16 a) Measure 1 – A national environmental reporting series ................................................................................................................. 16 b) Measure 2 – Biodiversity considered in resource management plans and policies ........................................................................ 17 c) Measure 3 – National Policy Statement for freshwater management ............................................................................................ 19 III. Assessment of Progress ................................................................................................................................................... 20 4. MORE OF NEW ZEALAND’S NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS ARE BENEFITING FROM PEST MANAGEMENT. ................................. 22 I. General information ........................................................................................................................................................ 22 II. Implementation measures ............................................................................................................................................... 22 a) Measure 1 – Battle for Our Birds: landscape-scale control of mammalian predators .................................................................... 22 b) Measure 2 – National Wilding Conifer Control Programme ............................................................................................................ 25 III. Assessment of Progress ................................................................................................................................................... 27 5. BIODIVERSITY IS INTEGRATED INTO NEW ZEALAND’S FISHERIES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ............................................... 29 I. General information ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 II. Implementation Measures .............................................................................................................................................. 29 a) Measure 1 – Fisheries Change Programme ..................................................................................................................................... 29 III. Assessment of Progress ................................................................................................................................................... 31 6. IMPROVED UNDERSTANDING OF THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON BIODIVERSITY INFORMS BETTER MANAGEMENT OF VULNERABLE ECOSYSTEMS AND INDIGENOUS SPECIES .............................................................................. 32 I. General information ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 II. Implementation Measures .............................................................................................................................................. 32 a) Measure 1 – Coastal risk assessment .............................................................................................................................................. 32 III. Assessment of Progress ................................................................................................................................................... 34 7. SUSTAINABLE USE AND PROTECTION OF BIODIVERSITY IS PROMOTED THROUGH IMPROVED NATIONAL GUIDANCE, INFORMATION AND INDUSTRY PRACTICES............................................................................................................................... 36 I. General information ........................................................................................................................................................ 36 II. Implementation measures ............................................................................................................................................... 36 a) Measure 1 – A national policy statement on biodiversity developed by stakeholders ................................................................... 36 b) Measure 2 – Improved decision-making on agricultural land use to maintain soil and water health ............................................. 37 c) Measure 3 – A national environmental standard for plantation forestry ....................................................................................... 38 III. Assessment of Progress ................................................................................................................................................... 39 8. INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES AND PATHWAYS ARE IDENTIFIED AND PRIORITISED, PRIORITY SPECIES ARE CONTROLLED OR ERADICATED, AND MEASURES ARE IN PLACE TO MANAGE PATHWAYS TO MINIMISE LIKELIHOOD OF THEIR INTRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT ............................................................................................................................................................... 42 I. General information ........................................................................................................................................................ 42 II. Implementation measures ............................................................................................................................................... 42 1 a) Measure 1 – Review of pest management plans ............................................................................................................................. 42 b) Measure 2 – Development and implementation of the Biosecurity 2025
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago
    Society for Research on Amphibians and Reptiles in New Zealand (SRARNZ) presents Reptiles and Amphibians of Otago Otago is a large (31,251 km2) and lightly populated region of the southern South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand, stretching from the eastern coastline west to the Southern Alps. The earliest humans, of East Polynesian origin, arrived about 700 years ago. The largest settlement today is the coastal city of Dunedin (pop. >127,000), which grew from a Scottish influx in the 1800s. The Otago Regional Council administers the region, and tribal authority (mana whenua) rests with the iwi of Ngāi Tahu. Climates in the Otago region (roughly 45°– leiopelmatid frogs survive elsewhere in 47°S) range from changeable, cool- New Zealand. Two species of introduced temperate conditions near the coast to frogs are present, but there are no the near-continental climates (baking hot crocodilians, salamanders, terrestrial summers, freezing winters) of the interior. snakes or turtles. Marine turtles (mainly The region provides varied habitats for leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea) herp species, including sand-dunes, visit the coastal waters of Otago but do grasslands, shrublands, wetlands, forests, not nest here. rock structures and scree slopes, some occupied to at least 1900 m above sea level. Today’s herpetofauna is dominated by lizards (solely geckos and skinks), including about 10 described species. A further 12 or more undescribed taxa are recognised Otago by tag names for conservation purposes, and we follow that approach here. All lizards in Otago are viviparous and long- lived, and remain vulnerable to ongoing habitat loss and predation by introduced mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIEF REVIEW of the WEATHER Percent of Normal in Much of Canterbury and As Low As 50 Percent of Normal in Coastal WINTER 1988 (Fig
    Weather and Climate (1989) 9: 29-36 29 NEW ZEALAND WEATHER BRIEF REVIEW OF THE WEATHER percent of normal in much of Canterbury and as low as 50 percent of normal in coastal WINTER 1988 (Fig. 1) areas of North Otago. Rainfall for winter was above normal in The mean temperature for New Zealand, calculated from 7 indicator stations (one of central highcountry regions of the North Is- which goes back to 1853) was 9.1°C. This was land, Wanganui, Manawatu, along the west 1.0°C above normal and was the third highest coast of the South Island, in Southland, Otago recorded. The warmest winter was that of and inland highcountry areas of Canterbury. The wettest regions were Manawatu, South 1984 when 9.4°C was recorded. In some places Westland and inland areas of Southland and in central Otago and inland Canterbury mean temperatures were as high as 1.5-2°C above Otago, where rainfall totals ranged between normal. 150 and 190 percent of normal. It was drier than usual in all regions of New One of the major factors which contributed Zealand which were sheltered from the west to the warmer weather was that there were and south-west. Rainfall was less than 60 fewer periods of very cold southerly condi- .1.0 +0.6 —0,6 —1.0 SUNSHINE Pereentege of Normal (1061-00) Seimrture from Mks, 0051 -00) WINTER WINTER ((IV))TEMPERAXURE Nme Zei•land Meteorological Service Neer Unload Mettorotogmal Service 1 Fig. 1: Winter 1988. Rainfall (a) maps based on observations from 46 stations; temperature (b) departure maps based on observations from 43 stations; sunshine (c) based on observations from 33 stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Variation in New Zealand English Is Something of a Conundrum
    Regional variation in NZ English Regional variation in New Zealand English is something of a conundrum. Although a dialect of the Southland/Otago region is well-known and documented (Bartlett 1992, 2003; Hay, Maclagan and Gordon 2008), linguists have yet to find concrete evidence of other regional New Zealand English dialects. Yet the general New Zealand public are often adamant that there are regional differences in how New Zealand English is spoken. Folklinguistic evidence of regional variation Studies dealing with societal attitudes towards and beliefs about a language are called folklinguistic studies. Folklinguistic studies (Gordon 1997; Nielsen and Hay 2005) show that New Zealanders do tend to believe that there are regional differences in New Zealand English but, when asked to provide information about these differences, comments usually refer to characteristics of the region or the people living in the region rather than aspects of the language itself. For example, a study by Nielsen and Hay (2005) invited University students to rate their perceptions of New Zealand English in different regions according to its ‘pleasantness' and 'correctness' and to annotate a map of New Zealand with comments about speech in different regions. Although regions were rated differently, the ratings appeared to be based on stereotypes of the regions in question, rather than on any identifiable linguistic differences. People tended to rate their own region more highly for pleasantness and correctness and notes on the map mainly consisted of stereotypical descriptions such as ‘official’ for Wellington and ‘farmer speech’ for Taranaki. This inability to identify specific linguistic features that differ from one geographical area to the next stands in contrast to New Zealanders’ awareness of a ‘rolled’, or rather postvocalic /r/, in Southland.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. INTRODUCTION the Presentation and Interpretation of The
    Lecturer PhD Petronela SCUTARIU “Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administration Sciences, Suceava, Romania [email protected] Student Liviu Otniel FEDUR “Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administration Sciences, Suceava, Romania Android Developer, Protovate LLC, Hickory, North Carolina, USA Director, Livtech Soft SRL, Suceava, Romania [email protected] Abstract: The parallel examination of different states with their government systems is, was and will always be a necessary inurement for their in-depth knowledge and for the discovery of generalized orientations and developments. Regarding this affirmation, in the present article we intend to analyze from a comparative perspective two administrative systems, one from New Zealand and the other from South Africa, to identify the particularities in their organization and the way of functioning and to determine the similarities and differences between them. This research begins with the presentation of main identification data of the states, namely etymological explanations, continuing with the geographical locations and ending with the national emblems and flags. Afterwards, the present study provides insights into the genesis of the mentioned states, presenting brief historical records of how they appeared and developed. According to administrative-territorial organization criteria, New Zealand is divided into non-unitary and unitary regions, containing a territory as well, while South Africa is divided into provinces which, in turn, are divided into districts that are subdivided into local municipalities. From the point of view of the form of government, New Zealand is a unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy, while South Africa is a unitary parliamentary republic with an executive presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Format WITHOUT PHOTOS
    LIZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN WAKANUI CREEK REALIGNMENT 28 FEBRUARY 2018 LIZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN WAKANUI CREEK REALIGNMENT PREPARED BY: DYLAN VAN WINKEL BIORESEARCHES GROUP LTD 68 BEACH ROAD, AUCKLAND [email protected] FOR: AECOM NEW ZEALAND LIMITED PO BOX 4241 SHORTLAND ST AUCKLAND 1140 DATE: 28 FEBRUARY 2018 REFERENCE: BIORESEARCHES (2017). LIZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN: WAKANUI CREEK REALIGNMENT COVER ILLUSTRATION: OLIGOSOMA AFF. POLYCHROMA Level 4, 68 Beach Road, Auckland 1010; PO Box 2727, Shortland Street, Auckland 1140. T: (09) 379-9417; www.bioresearches.co.nz CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 2 LIZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................................................... 2 2.1 Context of the lizard management plan .............................................................. 2 2.2 Project area and area of affected habitat ........................................................... 2 2.3 Local lizard populations ....................................................................................... 5 2.4 Management of resident lizards .......................................................................... 5 3 LIZARD SALVAGE AND RELOCATION ................................................................................. 6 3.1 Lizard capture ...................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Active Searches .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Apfsos/Wp/05 in Depth Country Study
    ASIA-PACIFIC FORESTRY SECTOR OUTLOOK STUDY WORKING PAPER SERIES Working Paper No: APFSOS/WP/05 IN DEPTH COUNTRY STUDY - NEW ZEALAND by Chris Brown Consultant FAO Forestry Planning and Statistics Branch Rome Forestry Policy and Planning Division, Rome Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok May 1997 Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study Working Paper Series No: 5 1 In Depth Country Study - New Zealand 2 Chris Brown The Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study is being undertaken under the auspices of the Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission. This report comes under Workplan Number D23 (iii). In Depth Country Study - New Zealand Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study Working Paper Series No: 5 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION NOTE ON ASIA-PACIFIC FORESTRY SECTOR OUTLOOK STUDY..................... i INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1 CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................ 1 The New Zealand Economy and Economic Policy ......................................................................................... 1 Political Situation in New Zealand .................................................................................................................. 5 Social and Human Context for Forestry......................................................................................................... 6 THE NEW ZEALAND FOREST RESOURCE ....................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Rural Vote and the Rise of the Labour Party, 1931-1935
    THE RURAL VOTE AND THE RISE OF THE LABOUR PARTY, 1931-1935. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the University of Canterbury by Stephen W. McLeod University of Canterbury 2005 Contents List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. 4 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Map of Urban Polling Areas Exceeding 10 Percent of the Electorate's Votes, 10 Rural (Dairying) Electorates in the North Island of New Zealand, 1935 ................................................................ 11 Part I: Backgroulld .................................................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 12 Chapter 2: FIistoliography ........................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter 3: Methodology ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Drought in a Changing Climate
    Drought in a Changing Climate New Zealand’s future climate will be different What’s in store for farmers? to the one we have The most likely scenario sees farmers in most North Island regions, as well as those in eastern experienced so far. regions of the South Island – especially Canterbury and eastern Southland – spending 5-10 per cent Scientists expect wind more of the year in drought by the middle of this century. This means that if you spend an average of and rainfall patterns to 10 per cent of your time in drought at the moment, by 2040, you might expect to spend as much as 20 shift, bringing more rain per cent – although this figure will naturally vary from year to year. to western regions, with Between 2070 and 2090, that overall trend will intensify to the point where most of the country – with the east becoming drier. the likely exception of the West Coast of the South Island – will experience more time in drought. Even under very mild climate change, the Canterbury Plains will experience more frequent droughts. A 2011 study (see sidebar) highlighted the Less-likely scenarios implications for primary Drought scenarios for the period 2030 to 2050 range from small increases in the amount of time producers, many of spent in drought in eastern regions, through to a much more arid climate over most of the country. whom already have to Time spent in drought could double by the middle of the century, depending on the climate model deal with drought. and scenario considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 36D. South Pacific Ocean
    Chapter 36D. South Pacific Ocean Contributors: Karen Evans (lead author), Nic Bax (convener), Patricio Bernal (Lead member), Marilú Bouchon Corrales, Martin Cryer, Günter Försterra, Carlos F. Gaymer, Vreni Häussermann, and Jake Rice (Co-Lead member and Editor Part VI Biodiversity) 1. Introduction The Pacific Ocean is the Earth’s largest ocean, covering one-third of the world’s surface. This huge expanse of ocean supports the most extensive and diverse coral reefs in the world (Burke et al., 2011), the largest commercial fishery (FAO, 2014), the most and deepest oceanic trenches (General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans, available at www.gebco.net), the largest upwelling system (Spalding et al., 2012), the healthiest and, in some cases, largest remaining populations of many globally rare and threatened species, including marine mammals, seabirds and marine reptiles (Tittensor et al., 2010). The South Pacific Ocean surrounds and is bordered by 23 countries and territories (for the purpose of this chapter, countries west of Papua New Guinea are not considered to be part of the South Pacific), which range in size from small atolls (e.g., Nauru) to continents (South America, Australia). Associated populations of each of the countries and territories range from less than 10,000 (Tokelau, Nauru, Tuvalu) to nearly 30.5 million (Peru; Population Estimates and Projections, World Bank Group, accessed at http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/population-projection-tables, August 2014). Most of the tropical and sub-tropical western and central South Pacific Ocean is contained within exclusive economic zones (EEZs), whereas vast expanses of temperate waters are associated with high seas areas (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Does Collaborative Governance Increase Public Confidence in Water Management? Survey Evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand
    www.water-alternatives.org Volume 13 | Issue 2 Tadaki, M.; Sinner, J.; Stahlmann-Brown, P. and Greenhalgh, S. 2020. Does collaborative governance increase public confidence in water management? Survey evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand. Water Alternatives 13(2): 302-323 Does Collaborative Governance Increase Public Confidence in Water Management? Survey Evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand Marc Tadaki Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand; [email protected] Jim Sinner Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand; [email protected] Philip Stahlmann-Brown Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Wellington, New Zealand; [email protected] Suzie Greenhalgh Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected] ABSTRACT: Collaborative decision-making is widely understood as a democratic corrective to top-down forms of environmental management; it is a way in which citizens can contribute local knowledge to the policy process and have a more direct role in shaping policies and rules that affect them and their environments. However, while the democratic virtues of collaborative governance are often asserted, they are rarely evidenced; this leaves claims of democratic empowerment open to question. This study used a longitudinal survey of three New Zealand regions (n = 1350) to identify whether major multi-year investments in collaborative decision-making (2012-2018) are leading to increased public confidence in the effectiveness, responsiveness and fairness of water management institutions. Residents in collaborative catchments were found to have scores that were statistically indistinguishable from residents of non-collaborative catchments on management effectiveness, perceived agreement about water management, and fairness. Collaborative catchment residents did assign higher scores for water management responsiveness than did other residents, but the size of this difference was small compared to the effects of gender, ethnicity, region and level of individuals’ prior engagement in water management.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Knowledge of Deep-Sea Corals in the New Zealand Region Di Tracey1 and Freya Hjorvarsdottir2 (Eds, Comps) © 2019
    The state of knowledge of deep-sea corals in the New Zealand region Di Tracey1 and Freya Hjorvarsdottir2 (eds, comps) © 2019. All rights reserved. The copyright for this report, and for the data, maps, figures and other information (hereafter collectively referred to as “data”) contained in it, is held by NIWA is held by NIWA unless otherwise stated. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. While NIWA uses all reasonable endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the data, NIWA does not guarantee or make any representation or warranty (express or implied) regarding the accuracy or completeness of the data, the use to which the data may be put or the results to be obtained from the use of the data. Accordingly, NIWA expressly disclaims all legal liability whatsoever arising from, or connected to, the use of, reference to, reliance on or possession of the data or the existence of errors therein. NIWA recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to their use of the data and that they obtain independent professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances. NIWA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SERIES NUMBER 84 ISSN 1173-0382 Citation for full report: Tracey, D.M. & Hjorvarsdottir, F. (eds, comps) (2019). The State of Knowledge of Deep-Sea Corals in the New Zealand Region. NIWA Science and Technology Series Number 84. 140 p. Recommended citation for individual chapters (e.g., for Chapter 9.: Freeman, D., & Cryer, M. (2019). Current Management Measures and Threats, Chapter 9 In: Tracey, D.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in New Zealand's Planted Forests: a Review
    Baillie and Neary New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science (2015) 45:7 DOI 10.1186/s40490-015-0040-0 REVIEW Open Access Water quality in New Zealand’s planted forests: a review Brenda R Baillie1* and Daniel G Neary2 Abstract This paper reviewed the key physical, chemical and biological water quality attributes of surface waters in New Zealand’s planted forests. The purpose was to: a) assess the changes in water quality throughout the planted forestry cycle from afforestation through to harvesting; b) compare water quality from planted forests with other land uses in New Zealand; and c) identify knowledge gaps and opportunities for future research. Afforestation of pasture land significantly improved a wide range of water quality attributes such as stream temperature, nutrient and sediment concentrations and microbial contamination within 4-6 years of planting. Water quality in mid-rotation to mature forests, a large proportion of the forestry cycle, was highly variable but characterised by cool water temperatures, low concentrations of sediment and nutrients, with aquatic invertebrate communities indicative of high water quality. Impacts of timber harvesting on water quality attributes were greatest when clear-cut harvesting up to the stream edge. Harvest impacts were mediated by the retention of intact riparian buffers and to a lesser extent by retention of moderate quantities of logging slash across small stream channels. Temporal and spatial factors influenced the magnitude of response to harvesting activities and duration of the recovery period. Land-use comparisons generally showed improving water quality from pasture to planted forest to indigenous forest. Continued research to identify management systems that mitigate impacts on water quality, particularly during harvesting, remains a priority.
    [Show full text]