DOCSLIB.ORG

Effects of Early and Late Nocturnal Sleep on Declarative and Procedural Memory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Effects of Early and Late Nocturnal Sleep on Declarative and Procedural Memory Werner Plihal and Jan Born University of Bamberg, FRG Downloaded from http://mitprc.silverchair.com/jocn/article-pdf/9/4/534/1754819/jocn.1997.9.4.534.pdf by guest on 18 May 2021 Abstract 1 Recall of paired-associate lists (declarative memory) and early sleep, and recall of mirror-tracing skills improved more mirror-tracing skills (procedural memory) was assessed after during late sleep. The effects may reflect different influences retention intervals defined over early and late nocturnal sleep. of slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement @EM) In addition, effects of sleep on recall were compared with sleep since time in SWS was 5 times longer during the early those of early and late retention intervals filled with wakeful- than late sleep retention interval, and time in REM sleep was ness. Twenty healthy men served as subjects. Saliva cortisol twice as long during late than early sleep @ < 0.005).Changes concentrations were determined before and after the retention in cortisol concentrations, which independently of sleep and intervals to determine pituitary-adrenal secretory activity.Sleep wakefulness were lower during early retention intervals than was determined somnopolygraphically. Sleep generally en- late ones, cannot account for the effects of sleep on memory. hanced recall when compared with the effects of correspond- The experiments for the first time dissociate specific effects of ing retention intervals of wakefulness. The benefit from sleep early and late sleep on two principal types of memory, decla- on recall depended on the phase of sleep and on the type of rative and procedural, in humans. H memory: Recall of paired-associate lists improved more during INTRODUCTION practice sessions subjects learned to make the discrimi- nation with shorter exposure times of the stimulus Numerous studies in animals and humans have sug- configuration. While subjects still improved on this task gested that an essential function of sleep is the strength- following a night of SWS deprivation, deprivation of REM ening of memories (e.g., Cipolli, 1995; Dujardien, sleep completely abolished any beneficial effect of sleep. Guerrien, & Leconte, 1990). The sleep-dependent mecha- These results led the authors to suggest that REM sleep nisms underlying memory facilitation, however, are still facilitates the consolidation of procedural memory (i.e., poorly understood. Most studies approaching this issue memories considered to stem from repeated practicing have focused on the role of different sleep stages for of tasks of perceptual or motor skill learning; Squire, memory consolidation, and findings from these studies 1992). have merged into a still ongoing discussion contrasting Despite the large body of positive findings, quite a few the functions of slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye studies failed to demonstrate impairing effects of REM movement @EM) sleep in memory formation and con- sleep deprivation on human memory mainly in tasks of solidation (Dujardien et al., 1990). declarative memory (e.g., Ekstrand, Sullivan, Parker, Sr Mnemonic effects related to REM sleep have been West, 1971; Levin & Glaubman, 1975). In light of these mainly investigated in studies employing REM sleep dep- inconsistencies,it has been questioned whether the dep- rivation (for review, see Levin & Glaubman, 1975). In rivation of REM sleep is the most appropriate way to humans, impairment of memory following REM sleep identify the role of this sleep stage for memory pro- deprivation has been observed in a great variety of tasks cesses. The disruption of REM sleep may per se affect involving declarative memory, such as the recall of sen- cognitive and emotive aspects of stimulus processing tences and stories (e.g., Empson & Clarke, 1970;Tilley & more than disruption of any other sleep stage and may Empson, 1978). However, a strong deleterious effect of thus obscure the functions of this sleep stage essential REM sleep deprivation on memory has been recently for retention processes (Cipolli, 1995). This objection reported also for recall of procedural memories (Karni, appears to be supported by the fact that studies that did Tanne, Rubenstein, Askenasy, & Sagi, 1994). Those authors not employ selective sleep deprivation techniques over- trained subjects to discriminate the orientation of a all suggested a more positive effect on retention of SWS configuration of visually presented lines. With repeated than of REM sleep (Barrett & Ekstrand, 1972; Ekstrand, 0 I997 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 94,pp. 534-547 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.4.534 by guest on 30 September 2021 Barrett, West, & Maier, 1977;Fowler, Sullivan, & Ekstrand, RESULTS 1973;Yaroush, Sullivan, & Ekstrand, 1971). In those stud- Sleep ies, retention rates following undisturbed early and late nocturnal sleep were compared. If learning was followed Results from sleep recordings are summarized in Table by a 4-h retention interval placed in the early period of 1. Sleep time between the learning and recall period was nocturnal sleep characterized by extended epochs of nearly identical during the “early sleep” (189.65 f 7.68 SWS, recall of word pairs was superior to recall after a min) and “late sleep’’ condition (188.55 f 6.45 min). 4-h retention interval placed in the REM sleep predomi- However, sleep architecture substantially differed be- nated late period of sleep. However, evidence for an ad- tween both conditions. Time spent in SWS was about 5 vantage of SWS over REM sleep on memory consolidation times longer during early sleep than during late sleep Downloaded from http://mitprc.silverchair.com/jocn/article-pdf/9/4/534/1754819/jocn.1997.9.4.534.pdf by guest on 18 May 2021 provided by examinations of periods of undisturbed (refer to Table 1 for statistical results). In contrast,during early and late nocturnal sleep so far is based solely on early sleep, time spent in REM sleep on the average an assessment of declarative memories. Tasks of proce- reached only 35% of the time spent in this sleep stage dural memory have not been employed with this strategy. during late sleep. Sleep onset latency and latencies of the However, it is important to point out in this context different sleep stages were not different for the early and that early and late nocturnal sleep apart from the diver- late sleep conditions. gent distribution of SWS and REM sleep differ also with Both the condition of late sleep and late wake were respect to other factors that might well influence mem- preceded by 3-h intervals of sleep. Sleep in these inter- ory consolidation. Thus, secretory activity within the vals (prior to the learning period) were comparable, hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) system is at a mini- except that time in stage 1 sleep was slightly enhanced mum during the early part of nocturnal sleep and in the late wake condition. However, this difference did reaches a diurnal maximum in the late part of the night. not reach the 5% level of significance. This secretory pattern very likely reflects a tonic regula- tory influence of the septo-hippocampal system on the Cortisol HPA axis (Born, Steinbach,Dodt, & Fehm, 1997;De Kloet, 1991 ; De Kloet & Reul, 1987). Interestingly, several stud- Cortisol concentrations were substantially lower during ies in awake healthy humans indicated that high plasma the early sleep retention interval (0.34 f 0.13 pg/dl) than corticosteroid concentrations impair declarative mem- during late sleep retention interval (0.64 f 0.09 pg/dl; ory (eg,Kirschbaum, Wolf, May, Wippich,& Hellhammer, F(1, 9) = 7.29,p c 0.05). A parallel difference was ob- 1996; Newcomer, Craft, Hershey, Askins, & Bardgett, served in the wake control group with markedly lower 1994).This influence is probably mediated via binding to cortisol concentrations during the early wake (0.34 f hippocampal corticosteroid receptors (e.g., Bliss & 0.09 pg/dl) than during the late wake retention interval Collingridge, 1993; Oitzel & De Kloet, 1992), and it may (0.91 k 0.17; F(1, 9) = 13.47, p < 0.01). Differences express itself also in a differential impairment of recall between the experimental sleep group and the wake following early and late nocturnal sleep. control group for the corresponding early and late reten- The present study was designed to compare the role tion intervals were not significant (F(1, 18) = 0.00 and of early nocturnal sleep, dominated by SWS, and of late F(1, 18) = 1.82 for the early and the late night, respec- sleep, dominated by REM sleep, for the consolidation of tively). declarative and procedural memory. Since the selective dependency of procedural memory from REM sleep, so Paired-Associate far, has been shown only in the context of REM sleep Lists deprivation procedures, it was of particular interest to Table 2 summarizes results from performance on paired- examine whether procedural memory would improve associate lists for the learning and recall period of the also from undisturbed late sleep to a greater extent than four retention conditions (early sleep, late sleep, early from undisturbed early sleep. For this purpose, healthy wake, late wake). In the experimental sleep group, com- men were first trained (to a criterion) in recall of a parison of performance during the learning period (as paired-associate word list (a task of declarative memory) indicated by the number of trails until the criterion of and in a mirror-tracing task (a procedural memory task). 60% correct responses was reached and by the number Recall was again tested after 3-h retention intervals po- of correct responses during the final learning trial) did sitioned during early and during late sleep and also after not indicate any systematic difference between the con- corresponding intervals of wakefulness. In addition, ditions of early and late sleep.
Recommended publications
  • Dissociation Between Declarative and Procedural Mechanisms in Long-Term Memory

    Dissociation Between Declarative and Procedural Mechanisms in Long-Term Memory

    ! DISSOCIATION BETWEEN DECLARATIVE AND PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS IN LONG-TERM MEMORY A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Dale A. Hirsch August, 2017 ! A dissertation written by Dale A. Hirsch B.A., Cleveland State University, 2010 M.A., Cleveland State University, 2013 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by _________________________, Director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Bradley Morris _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Christopher Was _________________________, Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Karrie Godwin Accepted by _________________________, Director, School of Lifespan Development and Mary Dellmann-Jenkins Educational Sciences _________________________, Dean, College of Education, Health and Human James C. Hannon Services ! ""! ! HIRSCH, DALE A., Ph.D., August 2017 Educational Psychology DISSOCIATION BETWEEN DECLARATIVE AND PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS IN LONG-TERM MEMORY (66 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Bradley Morris The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential dissociation between declarative and procedural elements in long-term memory for a facilitation of procedural memory (FPM) paradigm. FPM coupled with a directed forgetting (DF) manipulation was utilized to highlight the dissociation. Three experiments were conducted to that end. All three experiments resulted in facilitation for categorization operations. Experiments one and two additionally found relatively poor recognition for items that participants were told to forget despite the fact that relevant categorization operations were facilitated. Experiment three resulted in similarly poor recognition for category names that participants were told to forget. Taken together, the three experiments in this investigation demonstrate a clear dissociation between the procedural and declarative elements of the FPM task.
  • How Trauma Impacts Four Different Types of Memory

    How Trauma Impacts Four Different Types of Memory

    How Trauma Impacts Four Different Types of Memory EXPLICIT MEMORY IMPLICIT MEMORY SEMANTIC MEMORY EPISODIC MEMORY EMOTIONAL MEMORY PROCEDURAL MEMORY What It Is What It Is What It Is What It Is The memory of general knowledge and The autobiographical memory of an event The memory of the emotions you felt The memory of how to perform a facts. or experience – including the who, what, during an experience. common task without actively thinking and where. Example Example Example Example You remember what a bicycle is. You remember who was there and what When a wave of shame or anxiety grabs You can ride a bicycle automatically, with- street you were on when you fell off your you the next time you see your bicycle out having to stop and recall how it’s bicycle in front of a crowd. after the big fall. done. How Trauma Can Affect It How Trauma Can Affect It How Trauma Can Affect It How Trauma Can Affect It Trauma can prevent information (like Trauma can shutdown episodic memory After trauma, a person may get triggered Trauma can change patterns of words, images, sounds, etc.) from differ- and fragment the sequence of events. and experience painful emotions, often procedural memory. For example, a ent parts of the brain from combining to without context. person might tense up and unconsciously make a semantic memory. alter their posture, which could lead to pain or even numbness. Related Brain Area Related Brain Area Related Brain Area Related Brain Area The temporal lobe and inferior parietal The hippocampus is responsible for The amygdala plays a key role in The striatum is associated with producing cortex collect information from different creating and recalling episodic memory.
  • Sleep's Role on Episodic Memory Consolidation

    Sleep's Role on Episodic Memory Consolidation

    SLEEP ’S ROLE ON EPISODIC MEMORY CONSOLIDATION IN ADULTS AND CHILDREN Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät und der Medizinischen Fakultät der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen vorgelegt von Jing-Yi Wang aus Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Volksrepublik China Dezember, 2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: February 22 , 2017 Dekan der Math.-Nat. Fakultät: Prof. Dr. W. Rosenstiel Dekan der Medizinischen Fakultät: Prof. Dr. I. B. Autenrieth 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Jan Born 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Steffen Gais Prüfungskommission: Prof. Manfred Hallschmid Prof. Dr. Steffen Gais Prof. Christoph Braun Prof. Caterina Gawrilow I Declaration: I hereby declare that I have produced the work entitled “Sleep’s Role on Episodic Memory Consolidation in Adults and Children”, submitted for the award of a doctorate, on my own (without external help), have used only the sources and aids indicated and have marked passages included from other works, whether verbatim or in content, as such. I swear upon oath that these statements are true and that I have not concealed anything. I am aware that making a false declaration under oath is punishable by a term of imprisonment of up to three years or by a fine. Tübingen, the December 5, 2016 ........................................................ Date Signature III To my beloved parents – Hui Jiao and Xuewei Wang, Grandfather – Jin Wang, and Frederik D. Weber 致我的父母：焦惠和王学伟 爷爷王金，以及 爱人王敬德 V Content Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................................
  • Sherman Dissertation

    Sherman Dissertation

    Copyright by Stephanie Michelle Sherman 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Stephanie Michelle Sherman certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Associations between sleep and memory in aging Committee: David Schnyer, Supervisor Christopher Beevers Andreana Haley Carmen Westerberg Associations between sleep and memory in aging by Stephanie Michelle Sherman, B.S. DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The University of Texas at Austin May 2016 Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my advisor, David Schnyer, for his guidance and mentorship. He challenged me to think critically about research questions, analyses, and the theoretical implications of our work. Over the course of 5 years, he opened the door to countless opportunities that have given me the confidence to tackle any research question. I would also like to thank my committee members: Chris Beevers, Andreana Haley, and Carmen Westerberg for their thoughtful comments and discussion. I am grateful for Corey White’s assistance on understanding and implementing the diffusion model. Jeanette Mumford and Greg Hixon were critical to advancing my understanding of statistics. From the Schnyer lab, I would especially like to thank Nick Griffin, Katy Seloff, Bridget Byrd, and Sapana Donde for their great conversations, insight, and friendship. I must acknowledge the incredible research assistants in the Schnyer lab who were willing to stay up all night to answer critical questions about sleep and memory in older adults, especially Jasmine McNeely, Mehak Gupta, Jiazhou Chen, Haley Bednarz, Tolan Nguyen, and Angela Murira.
  • PSYC20006 Notes

    PSYC20006 Notes

    PSYC20006 BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY PSYC20006 1 COGNITIVE THEORIES OF MEMORY Procedural Memory: The storage of skills & procedures, key in motor performance. It involves memory systems that are independent of the hippocampal formation, in particular, the cerebellum, basal ganglia, cortical motor sites. Doesn't involve mesial-temporal function, basal forebrain or diencephalon. Declarative memory: Accumulation of facts/data from learning experiences. • Associated with encoding & maintaining information, which comes from higher systems in the brain that have processed the information • Information is then passed to hippocampal formation, which does the encoding for elaboration & retention. Hippocampus is in charge of structuring our memories in a relational way so everything relating to the same topic is organized within the same network. This is also how memories are retrieved. Activation of 1 piece of information will link up the whole network of related pieces of information. Memories are placed into an already exiting framework, and so memory activation can be independent of the environment. MODELS OF MEMORY Serial models of Memory include the Atkinson-Shiffrin Model, Levels of Processing Model & Tulving’s Model — all suggest that memory is processed in a sequential way. A parallel model of memory, the Parallel Distributed Processing Model, is one which suggests types of memories are processed independently. Atkinson-Shiffrin Model First starts as Sensory Memory (visual / auditory). If nothing is done with it, fades very quickly but if you pay attention to it, it will move into working memory. Working Memory contains both new information & from long-term memory. If it goes through an encoding process, it will be in long-term memory.
  • The Declarative/Procedural Model Michael T

    The Declarative/Procedural Model Michael T

    Cognition 92 (2004) 231–270 www.elsevier.com/locate/COGNIT Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model Michael T. Ullman* Brain and Language Laboratory, Departments of Neuroscience, Linguistics, Psychology and Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA Received 12 December 2001; revised 13 December 2002; accepted 29 October 2003 Abstract The structure of the brain and the nature of evolution suggest that, despite its uniqueness, language likely depends on brain systems that also subserve other functions. The declarative/procedural (DP) model claims that the mental lexicon of memorized word-specific knowledge depends on the largely temporal-lobe substrates of declarative memory, which underlies the storage and use of knowledge of facts and events. The mental grammar, which subserves the rule-governed combination of lexical items into complex representations, depends on a distinct neural system. This system, which is composed of a network of specific frontal, basal-ganglia, parietal and cerebellar structures, underlies procedural memory, which supports the learning and execution of motor and cognitive skills, especially those involving sequences. The functions of the two brain systems, together with their anatomical, physiological and biochemical substrates, lead to specific claims and predictions regarding their roles in language. These predictions are compared with those of other neurocognitive models of language. Empirical evidence is presented from neuroimaging studies of normal language processing, and from developmental and adult-onset disorders. It is argued that this evidence supports the DP model. It is additionally proposed that “language” disorders, such as specific language impairment and non-fluent and fluent aphasia, may be profitably viewed as impairments primarily affecting one or the other brain system.
  • Declarative Memory and Procedural Memory

    Declarative Memory and Procedural Memory

    Declarative Memory And Procedural Memory Experienced Frank sometimes rentes his retentionist helpfully and restocks so anes! Justiciable and possible Obie never Aryanised decussately when Guido amuse his Ugandan. Ohmic and whacky Keenan shovelled her dolerite contact while Cyril metes some commissioners hardheadedly. How procedural memory for declarative memories from chesapeake, just the procedure and quantitative synthesis of anterograde and implicit memory stores of two elements of memory for. Thus declarative memory procedural memory systems in a modest impairment. Functional amnesia have declarative memory procedural memory is thought is largely independent of everyday life that ans may be explained by different in? Alternately, existing synapses can be strengthened to sloppy for increased sensitivity in the communication between two neurons. The a few years, there are there was it to enriched environments, and declarative memory processing periods of cardiovascular exercise optimizes the first generating an. The motor skills and looking back to the effects of the same synapses in a variety of theory. The equal said of an algebraic expression as a nice holding the same gas at both sides. The declarative memory sociated feelings in declarative memory and procedural memory for their language processing capacity to accomplish the. In then allows it help the declarative memory and declarative. Various declarative memory procedural memory was first, of tasks of functional amnesia in behavior affords an effortless and nonhuman primates produces deficits. Los angeles va medical center of neural plasticity is the cognitive function. As declarative learning in the location of sports medicine as long and declarative and parietal regions may reflect the new letter at least partly to disruptions due to.
  • Procedural and Declarative Memory in Children with Developmental Disorders of Language and Literacy

    Procedural and Declarative Memory in Children with Developmental Disorders of Language and Literacy

    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 917 Procedural and Declarative Memory in Children with Developmental Disorders of Language and Literacy MARTINA HEDENIUS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6206 ISBN 978-91-554-8707-2 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-204245 2013 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Gustavianum, Uppsala, Friday, September 13, 2013 at 13:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Faculty of Medicine). The examination will be conducted in English. Abstract Hedenius, M. 2013. Procedural and Declarative Memory in Children with Developmental Disorders of Language and Literacy. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 917. 96 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-554-8707-2. The procedural deficit hypothesis (PDH) posits that a range of language, cognitive and motor impairments associated with specific language impairment (SLI) and developmental dyslexia (DD) may be explained by an underlying domain-general dysfunction of the procedural memory system. In contrast, declarative memory is hypothesized to remain intact and to play a compensatory role in the two disorders. The studies in the present thesis were designed to test this hypothesis. Study I examined non-language procedural memory, specifically implicit sequence learning, in children with SLI. It was shown that children with poor performance on tests of grammar were impaired at consolidation of procedural memory compared to children with normal grammar. These findings support the PDH and are line with previous studies suggesting a link between grammar processing and procedural memory. In Study II, the same implicit sequence learning paradigm was used to test procedural memory in children with DD.
  • Models of Memory

    Models of Memory

    To be published in H. Pashler & D. Medin (Eds.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Third Edition, Volume 2: Memory and Cognitive Processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. MODELS OF MEMORY Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers Richard M. Shiffrin University of Amsterdam Indiana University Introduction Sciences tend to evolve in a direction that introduces greater emphasis on formal theorizing. Psychology generally, and the study of memory in particular, have followed this prescription: The memory field has seen a continuing introduction of mathematical and formal computer simulation models, today reaching the point where modeling is an integral part of the field rather than an esoteric newcomer. Thus anything resembling a comprehensive treatment of memory models would in effect turn into a review of the field of memory research, and considerably exceed the scope of this chapter. We shall deal with this problem by covering selected approaches that introduce some of the main themes that have characterized model development. This selective coverage will emphasize our own work perhaps somewhat more than would have been the case for other authors, but we are far more familiar with our models than some of the alternatives, and we believe they provide good examples of the themes that we wish to highlight. The earliest attempts to apply mathematical modeling to memory probably date back to the late 19th century when pioneers such as Ebbinghaus and Thorndike started to collect empirical data on learning and memory. Given the obvious regularities of learning and forgetting curves, it is not surprising that the question was asked whether these regularities could be captured by mathematical functions.
  • Memory Processes

    Memory Processes

    6 CHAPTER Memory Processes CHAPTER OUTLINE Encoding and Transfer of Information The Constructive Nature of Memory Forms of Encoding Autobiographical Memory Short-Term Storage Memory Distortions Long-Term Storage The Eyewitness Testimony Paradigm Transfer of Information from Short-Term Memory Repressed Memories to Long-Term Memory The Effect of Context on Memory Rehearsal Key Themes Organization of Information Summary Retrieval Retrieval from Short-Term Memory Thinking about Thinking: Analytical, Parallel or Serial Processing? Creative, and Practical Questions Exhaustive or Self-Terminating Processing? Key Terms The Winner—a Serial Exhaustive Model—with Some Qualifications Media Resources Retrieval from Long-Term Memory Intelligence and Retrieval Processes of Forgetting and Memory Distortion Interference Theory Decay Theory 228 CHAPTER 6 • Memory Processes 229 Here are some of the questions we will explore in this chapter: 1. What have cognitive psychologists discovered regarding how we encode information for storing it in memory? 2. What affects our ability to retrieve information from memory? 3. How does what we know or what we learn affect what we remember? n BELIEVE IT OR NOT THERE’SAREASON YOU REMEMBER THOSE ANNOYING SONGS that strengthens the connections associated with that Having a song or part of a song stuck in your head is phrase. In turn, this increases the likelihood that you will incredibly frustrating. We’ve all had the experience of the recall it, which leads to more reinforcement. song from a commercial repeatedly running through our You could break this unending cycle of repeated recall minds, even though we wanted to forget it. But sequence and reinforcement—even though this is a necessary and recall—remembering episodes or information in sequen- normal process for the strengthening and cementing of tial order (like the notes to a song)—has a special and memories—by introducing other sequences.
  • The Role of Sleep in Memory Consolidation: Effects Of

    The Role of Sleep in Memory Consolidation: Effects Of

    The Role of Sleep in Memory Consolidation: Effects of Lateralisation and Emotion Chloe Rhianne Newbury This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lancaster University Department of Psychology May 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents......................................................................................................... i Alternative Format Form............................................................................................. iv Declaration................................................................................................................... v List of Tables............................................................................................................... vi List of Figures............................................................................................................. viii List of Abbreviations.................................................................................................. xii Acknowledgements.................................................................................................... xiii Thesis Abstract.......................................................................................................... xiv 1. Literature Review................................................................................................. 1 1.1 General Introduction to the Thesis................................................................... 1 1.2 Sleep....................................................................................................................
  • Improving Sleep and Cognition in Young Adults and the Elderly

    Improving Sleep and Cognition in Young Adults and the Elderly

    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2014 Improving sleep and cognition in young adults and the elderly Cordi, Maren Abstract: Sleep, particularly slow-wave sleep (SWS), is a critical factor for health and well-being. Fur- thermore, SWS provides a brain state supportive for the spontaneous reactivation, stabilization, and long-term storage of declarative memories. Sleep architecture changes across lifespan and the parallel nascent impairments in SWS, cognition, and other health aspects hint at a deteriorating interplay between these three factors. Thus, a profound understanding of the nature of the relationship between sleep and memory in young and old human participants is fundamental in successfully finding new ways of memory- and sleep-related interventions. The first study was designed to clarify the role of induced reactivations for memory consolidation during sleep in different sleep stages. While reactivation during SWS has been reported to improve memory and stabilize it against future interference, the role of reactivations during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is less clear. On the one hand, spontaneous reactivations, functionally associated with memory performance, exist in REM sleep. On the other hand, declarative memories have proven stable after sleep which is free from REM sleep. As induction of memory reactivations during REM sleep failed to shelter memory from interference, we concluded that spontaneous reactivations which appear during REM sleep do not contribute to the stabilization of declarative memories. The second study tested hypnosis as a tool to objectively improve sleep as its efficacy had previously been proven for subjective sleep measures.