DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Dendritic Cells, Their Role in Clinical Immunology, and Distribution in Various Animal Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Dendritic Cells, Their Role in Clinical Immunology, and Distribution in Various Animal Species International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Review of Dendritic Cells, Their Role in Clinical Immunology, and Distribution in Various Animal Species Mohammed Yusuf Zanna 1 , Abd Rahaman Yasmin 1,2,* , Abdul Rahman Omar 2,3 , Siti Suri Arshad 3, Abdul Razak Mariatulqabtiah 2,4 , Saulol Hamid Nur-Fazila 3 and Md Isa Nur Mahiza 3 1 Department of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Vaccines and Biomolecules, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] (A.R.O.); [email protected] (A.R.M.) 3 Department of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] (S.S.A.); [email protected] (S.H.N.-F.); [email protected] (M.I.N.M.) 4 Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +603-8609-3473 or +601-7353-7341 Abstract: Dendritic cells (DCs) are cells derived from the hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) of the bone marrow and form a widely distributed cellular system throughout the body. They are the most effi- cient, potent, and professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) of the immune system, inducing and dispersing a primary immune response by the activation of naïve T-cells, and playing an important role in the induction and maintenance of immune tolerance under homeostatic conditions. Thus, this Citation: Zanna, M.Y.; Yasmin, A.R.; review has elucidated the general aspects of DCs as well as the current dynamic perspectives and Omar, A.R.; Arshad, S.S.; distribution of DCs in humans and in various species of animals that includes mouse, rat, birds, dog, Mariatulqabtiah, A.R.; Nur-Fazila, cat, horse, cattle, sheep, pig, and non-human primates. Besides the role that DCs play in immune S.H.; Mahiza, M.I.N. Review of response, they also play a pathogenic role in many diseases, thus becoming a target in disease Dendritic Cells, Their Role in Clinical prevention and treatment. In addition, its roles in clinical immunology have also been addressed, Immunology, and Distribution in which include its involvement in transplantation, autoimmune disease, viral infections, cancer, and Various Animal Species. Int. J. Mol. as a vaccine target. Therefore, based on the current knowledge and understanding of the important Sci. 2021, 22, 8044. https://doi.org/ roles they play, DCs can be used in the future as a powerful tool for manipulating the immune system. 10.3390/ijms22158044 Keywords: dendritic cells (DCs); human; animal species; clinical immunology Academic Editor: Marcello Chieppa Received: 28 April 2021 Accepted: 17 June 2021 Published: 28 July 2021 1. Introduction Dendritic cells (DCs) were derived from pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral of the bone marrow. They belong to a group of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that include with regard to jurisdictional claims in B-cells and macrophages. They were originally discovered in 1973 by two Canadian published maps and institutional affil- scientists named Ralph Steinman and Zanvil Cohn as a previously undefined cell type in the iations. mouse spleen [1], and eventually known as “dendritic cells” because of their typical features of multiple extended dendritic or pseudopodia-like cytoplasmic protrusions during their maturation stage. DCs work as sentinel cells in the immune system and are found in every part of the body, including the skin, peripheral blood, mucosal surfaces, interstitial Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. tissues lymphoid, and non-lymphoid tissue areas of the body [2]. It has been of paramount Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. importance to study DCs because they are the most potent APCs to be able to present This article is an open access article antigens to T-cells, and, significantly, they play a vital role in host immunity by inducing distributed under the terms and innate inflammatory responses to pathogens, effectively and efficiently priming immature conditions of the Creative Commons T-cells as well as activating and generating immunological memory T-cells and also the Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// induction of B-cell activation. DCs are also involved in other significant immune functions, creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ such as immune tolerance by maintaining steady-state immune homeostasis through 4.0/). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8044. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22158044 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8044 2 of 25 continually presenting tissue-derived self-antigens to CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, therefore leading to tolerance against those self-antigens. Additionally, they play a major role in the development of an effective adaptive immune response; therefore, DCs are considered to be the center of the immune system, because they provide an important link between the innate and adaptive immune response. Therefore, the importance of DCs in many aspects of biomedical research and health cannot be overemphasized. Their use in diagnostic and research purposes, such as vaccine production and virus-propagation, and their vital role in several DC-based immunotherapies, such as in cancer therapy, where they have recently been used as therapeutic and monitoring tools, makes DCs an important target in disease prevention and treatment; however, despite many studies on DCs, there is still a dearth of information on DCs in humans and various species of animal, which needs to be fully explored. This necessitates the present review, to ascertain the current status of DCs in human and in certain species of animal. Therefore, this review has elucidated the important aspects of DCs, their role in clinical immunology and their distribution in humans and certain species of animal. Hence, this knowledge will provide an overview for future research and clinical trials. 1.1. History and Discovery of Dendritic Cells The first known report on DCs was made in 1868 by a German medical student, Paul Langerhans [3]. He discovered some different sets of cells in the epidermis with a dendritic appearance, and misinterpreted them as being cells of the nervous system because neurons were the only cells known at the time to have such appearance. Then, in 1973, two Canadian scientists, Ralph Steinman and Zanvil Cohn, discovered an immune cell in the spleen and peripheral lymph node of a mouse with a unique “stellate” morphological appearance and named it a “dendritic cell” because of its myriad filopodial protrusions that extended from the cell body. In 1973, Steinman and Cohn also reported that DCs expressed high levels of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, which are known to be the primary mechanism of antigen presentation. In 1978, the role of DCs as APCs was confirmed using the Mixed Lymphocytes Reaction (MLR) assay with T-Lymphocytes. MLR is an experiment that determines the primary stimulatory ability of DCs to present antigen using the MHC and its capacity to activate naïve T-cells, which recognize the specific antigen being presented. 1.2. The Origin and Anatomical Location of Dendritic Cells DCs are heterogeneous groups of leukocytes that are found in most body parts, but they have different origins, anatomical locations, and surface markers [4]. DCs in hu- mans and mice originate from HSCs of the bone marrow, which are derived from either lymphoid or myeloid precursors. The phenotypic features and anatomical locations of these two precursors differ, but both the myeloid and lymphoid DCs from humans and murine expressed a high level of CD11c, MHC-II, and costimulatory molecules CD40, CD80, CD83, and CD86. Despite that they can be differentiated based on CD1 markers CD8α and DEC 205 [5]. Regarding the location of DCs, myeloid DCs are primarily located in the spleen marginal zone, whereas the lymphoid DCs are in the T-cell areas of the spleen and lymph nodes, precisely in the periarterial lymphatic sheaths (PALS). Even though both human and murine DCs originated from the same progenitor, their subsets play different roles in the regulation of B-cell activation and the differentiation of T-cells into Th-1 and Th-2, and in terms of the expression of surface markers, myeloid precursors expresses CD14+/CD11C+/CD1− and CD14−/CD11C+/CD1+, whereas the lymphoid precursor expresses CD14−/CD11C−/IL3Rα. The CD14+/CD11C+/CD1− surface markers ex- pressed by myeloid DCs possess high phagocytic as well as an endocytic ability when compared to lymphoid precursors CD14−/CD11C+/CD1+. Moreover, both Langerhans and interstitial DCs are strong stimulators of naïve T-cells, although interstitial DCs also play a vital role in the activation and differentiation of naïve B-cells in vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8044 3 of 25 1.3. Types of Dendritic Cell Subsets 1.3.1. Classical DCs (Conventional DCs) cDCs can be divided into two major subsets, based on the expression of the following surface molecules. These include CD8α+ and CD103+ or CD11b. In addition, both subsets can be found both in the lymphoid tissues, such as the spleen, lymph nodes, and bone marrow, and in most of the non-lymphoid tissue. (1) CD8α+ and CD103+ cDCs The CD8α+ and CD103+ cDCs are the best-characterized cDC subsets so far, both in terms of phenotype and gene expression signature [6]. Throughout evolution, they appear to be conserved [7]. The development of CD8α+ cDCs and their non-lymphoid counterpart, the CD103+ (CD11b-) cDC, is coordinated by the same transcription factors, which include the inhibitor of DNA binding 2 (Id2), interferon regulatory factor 8 (IRF8), basic leucine zipper ATF-like 3 transcription factor (BATF), and the nuclear factor interleukin 3 (NFIL3). Therefore, the deletion of any of these genes will eventually lead to severe developmental defects of CD8α+ DCs and also the non-lymphoid tissue CD103+ cDCs, but not the CD11b+ cDCs [8].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Killer Cells and Current Applications of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified NK-92 Cells in Tumor Immunotherapy
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Natural Killer Cells and Current Applications of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified NK-92 Cells in Tumor Immunotherapy Jianguang Zhang, Huifang Zheng and Yong Diao * School of Medicine, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, Fujian, China; [email protected] (J.Z.); [email protected] (H.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-595-2269-2516 Received: 15 November 2018; Accepted: 11 January 2019; Published: 14 January 2019 Abstract: Natural killer (NK) cells are innate immune cells that can be activated rapidly to target abnormal and virus-infected cells without prior sensitization. With significant advancements in cell biology technologies, many NK cell lines have been established. Among these cell lines, NK-92 cells are not only the most widely used but have also been approved for clinical applications. Additionally, chimeric antigen receptor-modified NK-92 cells (CAR-NK-92 cells) have shown strong antitumor effects. In this review, we summarize established human NK cell lines and their biological characteristics, and highlight the applications of NK-92 cells and CAR-NK-92 cells in tumor immunotherapy. Keywords: natural killer cell line; NK-92; chimeric antigen receptor; immunotherapy; tumor 1. Introduction Natural killer (NK) cells are innate immune cells that were first discovered in mice in 1975 [1]. NK cells account for approximately 10% of lymphocytes in human peripheral blood (PB). Owing to the distinct chemokine receptors expressed in NK cells, the distributions of NK cells differ among healthy tissues. Most NK cells are found in the PB, liver, spleen, and bone marrow, and a small portion are also present in the lymph nodes [2–5].
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Monocyte Migration to CXCR3 and CCR5 Chemokines in COPD
    ERJ Express. Published on March 10, 2016 as doi: 10.1183/13993003.01642-2015 ORIGINAL ARTICLE IN PRESS | CORRECTED PROOF Enhanced monocyte migration to CXCR3 and CCR5 chemokines in COPD Claudia Costa1, Suzanne L. Traves1, Susan J. Tudhope1, Peter S. Fenwick1, Kylie B.R. Belchamber1, Richard E.K. Russell2, Peter J. Barnes1 and Louise E. Donnelly1 Affiliations: 1Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. 2Chest Clinic, King Edward King VII Hospital, Windsor, UK. Correspondence: Louise E. Donnelly, Airway Disease, National Heart and Lung Institute, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY, UK. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients exhibit chronic inflammation, both in the lung parenchyma and the airways, which is characterised by an increased infiltration of macrophages and T-lymphocytes, particularly CD8+ cells. Both cell types can express chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor (CXCR)3 and C-C chemokine receptor 5 and the relevant chemokines for these receptors are elevated in COPD. The aim of this study was to compare chemotactic responses of lymphocytes and monocytes of nonsmokers, smokers and COPD patients towards CXCR3 ligands and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL)5. Migration of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, monocytes and lymphocytes from nonsmokers, smokers and COPD patients toward CXCR3 chemokines and CCL5 was analysed using chemotaxis assays. There was increased migration of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from COPD patients towards all chemokines studied when compared with nonsmokers and smokers. Both lymphocytes and monocytes contributed to this enhanced response, which was not explained by increased receptor expression.
    [Show full text]
  • S41467-017-02610-0.Pdf
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02610-0 OPEN Angiogenic factor-driven inflammation promotes extravasation of human proangiogenic monocytes to tumours Adama Sidibe 1,4, Patricia Ropraz1, Stéphane Jemelin1, Yalin Emre 1, Marine Poittevin1, Marc Pocard2,3, Paul F. Bradfield1 & Beat A. Imhof1 1234567890():,; Recruitment of circulating monocytes is critical for tumour angiogenesis. However, how human monocyte subpopulations extravasate to tumours is unclear. Here we show mechanisms of extravasation of human CD14dimCD16+ patrolling and CD14+CD16+ inter- mediate proangiogenic monocytes (HPMo), using human tumour xenograft models and live imaging of transmigration. IFNγ promotes an increase of the chemokine CX3CL1 on vessel lumen, imposing continuous crawling to HPMo and making these monocytes insensitive to chemokines required for their extravasation. Expression of the angiogenic factor VEGF and the inflammatory cytokine TNF by tumour cells enables HPMo extravasation by inducing GATA3-mediated repression of CX3CL1 expression. Recruited HPMo boosts angiogenesis by secreting MMP9 leading to release of matrix-bound VEGF-A, which amplifies the entry of more HPMo into tumours. Uncovering the extravasation cascade of HPMo sets the stage for future tumour therapies. 1 Department of Pathology and Immunology, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), Medical faculty, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland. 2 Department of Oncologic and Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hospital Lariboisière, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, F-75475 Paris cedex 10, France. 3 Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CART, INSERM U965, 49 boulevard de la Chapelle, F-75475 Paris cedex 10, France. 4Present address: Department of Physiology and Metabolism, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), Medical faculty, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Lung Adenocarcinoma-Intrinsic GBE1 Signaling Inhibits Anti-Tumor Immunity
    Li et al. Molecular Cancer (2019) 18:108 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-1027-x RESEARCH Open Access Lung adenocarcinoma-intrinsic GBE1 signaling inhibits anti-tumor immunity Lifeng Li1,3,4,5†, Li Yang1,3,4†, Shiqi Cheng1,3,4†, Zhirui Fan3, Zhibo Shen1,3,4, Wenhua Xue2, Yujia Zheng1,3,4, Feng Li1,3,4, Dong Wang1,3,4, Kai Zhang1,3,4, Jingyao Lian1,3,4, Dan Wang1,3,4, Zijia Zhu2, Jie Zhao2,5,6* and Yi Zhang1,3,4* Abstract Background: Changes in glycogen metabolism is an essential feature among the various metabolic adaptations used by cancer cells to adjust to the conditions imposed by the tumor microenvironment. Our previous study showed that glycogen branching enzyme (GBE1) is downstream of the HIF1 pathway in hypoxia-conditioned lung cancer cells. In the present study, we investigated whether GBE1 is involved in the immune regulation of the tumor microenvironment in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods: We used RNA-sequencing analysis and the multiplex assay to determine changes in GBE1 knockdown cells. The role of GBE1 in LUAD was evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. Results: GBE1 knockdown increased the expression of chemokines CCL5 and CXCL10 in A549 cells. CD8 expression correlated positively with CCL5 and CXCL10 expression in LUAD. The supernatants from the GBE1 knockdown cells increased recruitment of CD8+ T lymphocytes. However, the neutralizing antibodies of CCL5 or CXCL10 significantly inhibited cell migration induced by shGBE1 cell supernatants. STING/IFN-I pathway mediated the effect of GBE1 knockdown for CCL5 and CXCL10 upregulation. Moreover, PD-L1 increased significantly in shGBE1 A549 cells compared to those in control cells.
    [Show full text]
  • CD2 Molecules Redistribute to the Uropod During T Cell Scanning: Implications for Cellular Activation and Immune Surveillance
    CD2 molecules redistribute to the uropod during T cell scanning: Implications for cellular activation and immune surveillance Elena V. Tibaldi*†, Ravi Salgia†‡, and Ellis L. Reinherz*†§ *Laboratory of Immunobiology and ‡Division of Adult Oncology, Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and †Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 Communicated by Stuart F. Schlossman, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, April 9, 2002 (received for review February 14, 2002) Dynamic binding between CD2 and CD58 counter-receptors on op- cells, whereas its counter-receptor CD58 is expressed on a posing cells optimizes immune recognition through stabilization of diverse array of nucleated and non-nucleated cells including cell–cell contact and juxtaposition of surface membranes at a distance APCs and stromal cells (reviewed in refs. 11 and 12). CD2 suitable for T cell receptor–ligand interaction. Digitized time-lapse functions in both T cell adhesion and activation processes (13). Ϸ differential interference contrast and immunofluorescence micros- Of note, the weak affinity of the CD2-CD58 interaction (Kd copy on living cells now show that this binding also induces T cell 1 ␮M) is associated with remarkably fast on and off rates that polarization. Moreover, CD2 can facilitate motility of T cells along foster rapid and extensive exchange between CD2 and CD58 antigen-presenting cells via a movement referred to as scanning. Both partners on opposing cell surfaces (14–16). These biophysical activated CD4 and CD8 T cells are able to scan antigen-presenting cells characteristics are reminiscent of the selectin–ligand interactions surfaces in the absence of cognate antigen.
    [Show full text]
  • Acting on the CCR1 Receptor Mediates Neutrophil Migration in Immune Inflammation Via Sequential ␣ Release of TNF- and LTB4 Cleber D
    MIP-1␣[CCL3] acting on the CCR1 receptor mediates neutrophil migration in immune inflammation via sequential ␣ release of TNF- and LTB4 Cleber D. L. Ramos,* Claudio Canetti,*,† Janeusa T. Souto,‡,§ Joa˜ o S. Silva,‡ Cory M. Hogaboam,¶ Sergio H. Ferreira,* and Fernando Q. Cunha*,1 Departments of *Pharmacology and ‡Biochemistry and Immunology, School of Medicine of Ribeira˜o Preto, University of Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil; §Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil; and †Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine and ¶Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Abstract: In the present study, we investigated nists might have a therapeutic potential. J. Leukoc. the involvement of macrophage-inflammatory pro- Biol. 78: 167–177; 2005. tein-1␣ (MIP-1␣)[CC chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3)], MIP-1␤[CCL4], regulated on activation, normal Key Words: chemokines ⅐ chemokine receptors ⅐ chemotaxis T expressed and secreted (RANTES)[CCL5], and CC chemokine receptors (CCRs) on neutrophil mi- gration in murine immune inflammation. Previ- INTRODUCTION ously, we showed that ovalbumin (OVA)-triggered neutrophil migration in immunized mice depends on the sequential release of tumor necrosis factor Neutrophil migration is a complex process, which results ␣ ␣ mainly from the release of neutrophil chemotactic factors by (TNF- ) and leukotriene B4 (LTB4). Herein, we show increased mRNA expression for MIP- resident cells, inducing rolling and adhesion of neutrophils on 1␣[CCL3], MIP-1␤[CCL4], RANTES[CCL5], and endothelial cells, followed by their transmigration to the ex- travascular space [1, 2]. Apart from its importance in host CCR1 in peritoneal cells harvested from OVA-chal- defense, the migration of neutrophils to the inflammatory site lenged, immunized mice, as well as MIP-1␣[CCL3] is, at least in part, responsible for tissue damage observed in and RANTES[CCL5] but not MIP-1␤[CCL4] proteins several inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, in the peritoneal exudates.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioinformatics Identification of CCL8/21 As Potential Prognostic
    Bioscience Reports (2020) 40 BSR20202042 https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20202042 Research Article Bioinformatics identification of CCL8/21 as potential prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer microenvironment 1,* 2,* 3 4 5 1 Bowen Chen , Shuyuan Zhang ,QiuyuLi, Shiting Wu ,HanHe and Jinbo Huang Downloaded from http://portlandpress.com/bioscirep/article-pdf/40/11/BSR20202042/897847/bsr-2020-2042.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 1Department of Breast Disease, Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming 525000, China; 2Department of Clinical Laboratory, Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming 525000, China; 3Department of Emergency, Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming 525000, China; 4Department of Oncology, Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming 525000, China; 5Department of Medical Imaging, Maoming People’s Hospital, Maoming 525000, China Correspondence: Shuyuan Zhang ([email protected]) Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among females world- wide. The tumor microenvironment usually prevents effective lymphocyte activation and infiltration, and suppresses infiltrating effector cells, leading to a failure of the host toreject the tumor. CC chemokines play a significant role in inflammation and infection. Methods: In our study, we analyzed the expression and survival data of CC chemokines in patients with BC using several bioinformatics analyses tools. Results: The mRNA expression of CCL2/3/4/5/7/8/11/17/19/20/22 was remark- ably increased while CCL14/21/23/28 was significantly down-regulated in BC tis- sues compared with normal tissues. Methylation could down-regulate expression of CCL2/5/15/17/19/20/22/23/24/25/26/27 in BC. Low expression of CCL3/4/23 was found to be associated with drug resistance in BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Fcgr2a / Cd32a (H131) Protein Catalog # AMS.CD1-H5223-100UG for Research Use Only
    Human FcGR2A / CD32a (H131) Protein Catalog # AMS.CD1-H5223-100UG For Research Use Only Description Source Human FcGR2A / CD32a (H131) Protein,also called Human FcGR2A / CD32a Protein (167 His), Ala 36 - Ile 218 (Accession # P12318-1), was produced in human 293 cells (HEK293) Predicted N-terminus Ala 36 Protein Structure Molecular Human FcGR2A / CD32a (H131), His Tag is fused with a polyhistidine tag at the C-terminus, and has a calculated MW of 21.1 Characterization kDa. The predicted N-terminus is Ala 36. The reducing (R) protein migrates as 29-32 kDa in SDS-PAGE due to glycosylation. Endotoxin Less than 1.0 EU per μg by the LAL method. >95% as determined by SDS-PAGE. Purity Bioactivity The bioactivity is measured by its binding ability to Ipilimumab in a SPR assay. Immobilized Human FcGR2A / CD32a (H131), His Tag (Cat# AMS.CD1-H5223-100UG) can bind Ipilimumab with affinity constant of around 2.7 uM. Measured by its binding ability in a functional ELISA. Immobilized human IgG4 at 10μg/mL (100 µl/well),can bind Human FcGR2A / CD32a (H131), His Tag (Cat# AMS.CD1-H5223-100UG) with a linear of 0.1-2 μg/mL. Formulation and Storage Formulation Lyophilized from 0.22 μm filtered solution in PBS, pH7.4. Normally Trehalose is added as protectant before lyophilization. Contact us for customized product form or formulation. Please see Certificate of Analysis for specific instructions. For best performance, we strongly recommend you to follow the Reconstitution reconstitution protocol provided in the COA. Storage For long term storage, the product should be stored at lyophilized state at -20°C or lower.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Chemokine CCL5 and Systemic Malignancies
    J Hum Genet (2008) 53:377–378 DOI 10.1007/s10038-008-0270-6 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Association of chemokine CCL5 and systemic malignancies Shailendra Kapoor Received: 28 January 2008 / Accepted: 8 February 2008 / Published online: 27 March 2008 Ó The Japan Society of Human Genetics and Springer 2008 To the Editor CCL5 levels are also increased in a wide spectrum of The article by Konta et al. (2008) on the relationship other diseases, such as idiopathic inflammatory myopathies between CC chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) genotype and (Civatte et al. 2005) and chronic gastritis (Ohtani et al. urinary albumin excretion in the nondiabetic Japanese 2004). The recent study by Konta et al. further adds to general population is highly interesting. The study by diseases in which CCL5 plays a major pathogenetic role. Konta et al. adds to the growing array of pathological Further studies are needed to identify potent and safe conditions in which CCL5 plays a major role. Interestingly, inhibitors of CCL5 for better management of these diseases CCL5 has recently been implicated in the etiopathogenesis ranging from breast cancer to nondiabetic albuminuria. of a number of systemic malignancies. For instance, Luboshits et al. (1999), in a recent study, have shown that advanced breast cancers are associated References with increased expression of CCL5. CCL5 has also been shown to be a significant predictor of progression in Aldinucci D, Lorenzon D, Cattaruzza L, Pinto A, Gloghini A, Carbone A, Colombatti A (2008) Expression of CCR5 receptors patients with stage II breast cancer (Hahoshen et al. 2006). on Reed-Sternberg cells and Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines: In another study, tumors that expressed higher levels of involvement of CCL5/Rantes in tumor cell growth and micro- CCL5 were more likely to metastasize in comparison with environmental interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression and Function of the Chemokine Receptor XCR1 on Murine CD8+ DC
    Dissertation Expression and function of the chemokine receptor XCR1 on murine CD8+ DC zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) im Fach Biologie eingereicht an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von Master Biochemiker Ahmed Mora geboren am 27.12.1978 in Lyon Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Christoph Markschies Dekan der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I Prof. Dr. Lutz-Helmut Schön Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Peter-Michael Kloetzel 2. Prof. Dr. Richard Kroczek 3. Dr. Michal Or-Guil Tag der mündlichen Prüfung:16-03-2010 Summary The G protein-coupled receptor XCR1 has been described as the sole receptor for the chemokine ATAC. As contradictory data were published on the expression pattern of XCR1, its role in the immune system has not yet been defined. In this work, expression of XCR1 was characterized in B6.XCR1-lacZ+/+ reporter mice which express β-galactosidase under the control of the XCR1 promoter. In tissue sections, strong expression of XCR1 was only detected in lymphoid organs like spleen, lymph nodes and thymus. In the spleen, XCR1+ cells were mainly found in the marginal zones, but also in the red pulp and the T cell zones. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated exclusive expression of XCR1 on DC, mainly on the CD8+ DC subset, but also on a minority of CD4− CD8− DC. In vivo, these XCR1+ cells migrated in response to chemotactic or inflammatory stimuli: application of either an ATAC-expressing cell line or LPS induced within 3 - 9 h the translocation of XCR1+ cells to the T cell area of the spleen.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW Dendritic Cell-Based Vaccine
    Leukemia (1999) 13, 653–663 1999 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0887-6924/99 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/leu REVIEW Dendritic cell-based vaccine: a promising approach for cancer immunotherapy K Tarte1 and B Klein1,2 1INSERM U 475, Montpellier; and 2Unit For Cellular Therapy, CHU Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France The unique ability of dendritic cells to pick up antigens and to + + and interstitial DC pick up antigens (Ag) in peripheral tissues activate naive and memory CD4 and CD8 T cells raised the and migrate to lymphoid organs through lymphatic vessels in possibility of using them to trigger a specific anti-tumor 8 immunity. If numerous studies have shown a major interest in response to inflammatory stimuli. Activated mature DC, dendritic cell-based vaccines for cancer immunotherapy in ani- which express CD1a and CD83 antigens, represent the latter mal models, only a few have been carried out in human can- stage of LC and interstitial DC maturation. According to their cers. In this review, we describe recent findings in the biology high expression of MHC class I, MHC class II and costimu- of dendritic cells that are important to generate anti-tumor cyto- latory molecules, they present, efficiently, Ag-derived peptides toxic T cells in vitro and we also detail clinical studies reporting to CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in lymph node T cell areas the obtention of specific immunity to human cancers in vivo using reinfusion of dendritic cells pulsed with tumor antigens. (Figure 1). Recently, another subset of DC was identified on Keywords: dendritic cells; cancer; immunotherapy the basis of their high expression of the interleukin-3 receptor alpha chain (IL-3R␣hi).
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Chemokines in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Review)
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS 45: 809-823, 2021 Role of chemokines in hepatocellular carcinoma (Review) DONGDONG XUE1*, YA ZHENG2*, JUNYE WEN1, JINGZHAO HAN1, HONGFANG TUO1, YIFAN LIU1 and YANHUI PENG1 1Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051; 2Medical Center Laboratory, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200065, P.R. China Received September 5, 2020; Accepted December 4, 2020 DOI: 10.3892/or.2020.7906 Abstract. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent 1. Introduction malignant tumor worldwide, with an unsatisfactory prognosis, although treatments are improving. One of the main challenges Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common for the treatment of HCC is the prevention or management type of cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of of recurrence and metastasis of HCC. It has been found that cancer-associated death (1). Most patients cannot undergo chemokines and their receptors serve a pivotal role in HCC radical surgery due to the presence of intrahepatic or distant progression. In the present review, the literature on the multi- organ metastases, and at present, the primary treatment methods factorial roles of exosomes in HCC from PubMed, Cochrane for HCC include surgery, local ablation therapy and radiation library and Embase were obtained, with a specific focus on intervention (2). These methods allow for effective treatment the functions and mechanisms of chemokines in HCC. To and management of patients with HCC during the early stages, date, >50 chemokines have been found, which can be divided with 5-year survival rates as high as 70% (3). Despite the into four families: CXC, CX3C, CC and XC, according to the continuous development of traditional treatment methods, the different positions of the conserved N-terminal cysteine resi- issue of recurrence and metastasis of HCC, causing adverse dues.
    [Show full text]