DOCSLIB.ORG

Texas Aerospace Commission Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Texas Aerospace Commission Report A Snapshot of the Texas Aerospace Industry and a Comparison of Competitor States Project Participants Students Shannon Ario, MPSA, Texas A&M University; B.A. (Sociology), Texas A&M University Elizabeth Elliott, MPSA, Texas A&M University; B.A. (International Affairs), George Washington University Kevin Gray, MPSA, Texas A&M University; B.A. (History and Political Science), University of Tulsa Charles Hemmeline, MPSA, Texas A&M University; B.S. (Mechanical Engineering), Texas A&M University Dan Pomeroy, MPSA, Texas A&M University; B.S. (Political Science), University of Nevada, Las Vegas Andrew White, MPSA, Texas A&M University; B.A. (Political Science), University of California, Davis Paul Zurawski, MPSA, Texas A&M University; B.A. (Political Science), Trinity University Faculty Directors Eric Lindquist, Ph.D., Associate Research Scientist, Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy, George Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M University Arnold Vedlitz, Ph.D., Professor (Political Science); Bob Bullock Chair in Government and Public Policy; Director, Institute for Science, Technology and Public Policy, George Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M University ii Table of Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................... v List of Tables...................................................................................... vi Executive Summary.........................................................................viii Texas Overview Introduction .................................................................................................1 Economic Development ..............................................................................2 Human Capital.............................................................................................8 Aviation .....................................................................................................19 Aerospace Manufacturing .........................................................................24 Space..........................................................................................................29 Military......................................................................................................36 State Briefings Introduction ...............................................................................................41 Alabama.....................................................................................................43 Arizona ......................................................................................................51 California...................................................................................................59 Florida........................................................................................................71 Georgia ......................................................................................................80 Kansas........................................................................................................90 Mississippi.................................................................................................97 Oklahoma ................................................................................................104 Virginia....................................................................................................110 Washington..............................................................................................115 Summary ......................................................................................... 123 Appendix A SIC Classifications ..................................................................................A-1 Alabama...................................................................................................A-2 Arizona ....................................................................................................A-3 California.................................................................................................A-4 Florida......................................................................................................A-5 iii Georgia ....................................................................................................A-6 Kansas......................................................................................................A-7 Mississippi...............................................................................................A-8 Oklahoma ................................................................................................A-9 Texas......................................................................................................A-10 Virginia..................................................................................................A-11 Washington............................................................................................A-12 Boeing Educational Requirements ........................................................A-13 Certifications Required for Operators and Engineers in El Paso ..........A-16 iv List of Figures Figure 2-A. State Aerospace Industry as Percentage of Total Non-farm, Non-agricultural Workforce 1996-2000 .......................................................................................................13 Figure 2-B. Aerospace Employment by State 1996-2000...............................................15 Figure 2-C. Average Wage by State 1996-2000 .............................................................17 Figure 4-A. Aerospace Industry Sales.............................................................................24 Figure 5-A. NASA FY 2001 Procurement Distribution .................................................30 Figure 5-B. NASA Procurements by % of Total ............................................................30 Figure 5-C. Projected Distribution of Full Time Equivalent Workers FY 2003.............31 Figure 5-D. JSC Economic Impact FY2000....................................................................32 Figure 5-E. JSC Job Impact FY2000...............................................................................32 Figure 6-A. Military Contracts .......................................................................................36 Figure 6-B. Military Payroll ...........................................................................................36 Figure 8-A. Arizona Workforce Trend Compared to Total Workforce .........................53 Figure 8-B. Year to Year Percentage Change in Arizona, Phoenix-Mesa MA, and Tucson MA Nonfarm Employment, Qtr. 3 1998-Qtr. 2001..............................................53 Figure 9-A. NASA FY2001 Procurement Distribution...................................................68 Figure 9-B. NASA FY2001 Procurement Activity by Facility.......................................68 Figure 16-A. Washington State Annual Aerospace Employment ................................118 Figure 16-B. Aerospace Employment as a Percentage of Total State Employment ....119 Figure 16-C. Active Aircraft Population ......................................................................120 Figure 16-D. Total NASA FY2001 Procurement..........................................................121 v List of Tables Table 1-A. Key Benefits and Challenges for Industry Clusters ....................................................6 Table 2-A. Comparison of State Grades......................................................................................10 Table 2-B. Percent of Population over 25 who graduated from High School, 1999 ..................10 Table 2-C. Total Fall Enrollment in Degree Granting Institutions by State ..............................11 Table 2-D. Graduate Enrollment in Aerospace Engineering ......................................................11 Table 2-E. Total Bachelor’s and Master’s Degrees Conferred by Degree Granting Institutions .....................................................................................................................................12 Table 2-F. Total Computer Science and Engineering Bachelor’s and Master’s Degrees Conferred by Degree Granting Institutions ..................................................................................12 Table 2-G. Comparison of Aerospace Industry as Percentage* of Total Non-farm Non-agricultural Workforce ..........................................................................................................14 Table 2-H. Number Employed in Aerospace Industry as Defined by SIC Codes.......................16 Table 2-I. Average Wage for Aerospace Industry by State.........................................................17 Table 3-A. Economic Impact of Aviation ...................................................................................19 Table 3-B. Major Airports in the U.S.- 1998...............................................................................21 Table 3-C. Data for the U.S. Scheduled Airline Industry By State- 1998...................................22 Table 3-D. 1999 General Aviation Measures ..............................................................................23 Table 3-E. Growth in Texas General Aviation............................................................................23 Table 4-A. Aerospace sales and the National Economy..............................................................25 Table 4-B. Major Texas Aerospace Counties..............................................................................27
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Space Commercialization
    Commercial Market Outreach Plan for the International Space Station Report presented to: NASA Headquarters Report presented by: Equals Three Communications® and Booz Allen Hamilton February, 2002 THIS PAGE BLANK 2 Table of Contents Preface............................................................................................................ 7 Organization of the Report ....................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ..................................................................................... 11 Overview ................................................................................................ 11 Communication Strategy ........................................................................ 12 Target Industries ..................................................................................... 14 Target Audiences ................................................................................... 15 The Communication Program ................................................................ 15 Preparatory Steps .................................................................................. 20 Chapter 1: Background ................................................................................ 25 Commercial Development of Space ....................................................... 25 Space Commercialization and the ISS ................................................... 27 Policies and Procedures .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Space Industry Perspective: Tech Trends 2019
    Tech Trends 2019 l Deloitte Insights Tech Trends 2019 Space industry perspective Space technologies have a long history with disruption. The last decade has seen widespread change— for example, governments and other public entities historically played a driving role in space research and services, yet tomorrow’s disruptive space technologies increasingly will be driven by commercial forces. And the future will bring additional disruption in the areas of human spaceflight, in-space manufacturing, and next-generation communications. The combination of emerging technologies, new operating models, Organizations should look beyond the digital frontier—toward and other innovative concepts can accelerate the diffusion of space a future state in which transformation occurs across all mission technologies across multiple economies and sectors: intelligent portfolios and operating organizations. interfaces that integrate launch-range data into the National Airspace System; blockchain applications that validate remote As industry and government leaders work to reshape their sensing data; AI and machine learning applied to space science organizations, acquisition processes, and missions to take advantage missions. These and other advances can help produce substantial of new digital capabilities, they will require fresh, focused, sector- value that extends beyond any one organization. relevant insights. Begin here, with this report that provides a timely perspective on Deloitte’s Technology Trends 2019: Beyond the digital In the face of the changes ahead, it is not enough to simply plan frontier, focused specifically on the trends affecting the operators for digital transformation and assume that success will follow. and users of space systems. Macro technology forces at work Nine technology forces (cloud, analytics, Getting started Trends in action experience, blockchain, cognitive, digital • Learn from history.
    [Show full text]
  • Space for Agriculture Development and Food Security Use of Space Technology Within the United Nations System
    UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS Space for Agriculture Development and Food Security Use of Space Technology within the United Nations System UNITED NATIONS Contents Foreword 1 Background 2 United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA) 3 THEMATIC AREAS Agricultural research and development 5 Biodiversity 7 Desertification 8 Drought 11 Floods 14 Fisheries and aquaculture 17 Irrigation and water 18 Land-use mapping 21 Managing, mitigating and preparing for disasters 24 Monitoring agricultural production 26 Vegetation fires 28 Weather monitoring and forecasting 30 Acronyms and abbreviations 31 Contributors 32 COPYRIGHT • DISCLAIMER page i www.unoosa.org UNITED NATIONS CONVENTIONS, ENTITIES AND PROGRAMMES RELATED TO APPLICATIONS OF SPACE TECHNOLOGY FOR AGRICULTURE Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 6 Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) 6 Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) 9 Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) 10 Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) 12 Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) 13 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 15 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 16 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) 19 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 20 United Nations Office for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) 22 United Nations Institute for Training and Research/Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNITAR/UNOSAT) 23 United Nations Platform for Space-based Information for Disaster Management and Emergency Response (UN-SPIDER) 25 United Nations Programme on Space Applications 27 World Food Programme (WFP) 29 World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 29 page ii Foreword Food security and proper nutrition have become pressing global challenges, and the interrelated targets of ending hunger, achieving food security and improved nutrition, and promoting sustainable agriculture have been recognized collectively as a core sustainable development goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Archons (Commanders) [NOTICE: They Are NOT Anlien Parasites], and Then, in a Mirror Image of the Great Emanations of the Pleroma, Hundreds of Lesser Angels
    A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES A R C H O N S HIDDEN RULERS THROUGH THE AGES WATCH THIS IMPORTANT VIDEO UFOs, Aliens, and the Question of Contact MUST-SEE THE OCCULT REASON FOR PSYCHOPATHY Organic Portals: Aliens and Psychopaths KNOWLEDGE THROUGH GNOSIS Boris Mouravieff - GNOSIS IN THE BEGINNING ...1 The Gnostic core belief was a strong dualism: that the world of matter was deadening and inferior to a remote nonphysical home, to which an interior divine spark in most humans aspired to return after death. This led them to an absorption with the Jewish creation myths in Genesis, which they obsessively reinterpreted to formulate allegorical explanations of how humans ended up trapped in the world of matter. The basic Gnostic story, which varied in details from teacher to teacher, was this: In the beginning there was an unknowable, immaterial, and invisible God, sometimes called the Father of All and sometimes by other names. “He” was neither male nor female, and was composed of an implicitly finite amount of a living nonphysical substance. Surrounding this God was a great empty region called the Pleroma (the fullness). Beyond the Pleroma lay empty space. The God acted to fill the Pleroma through a series of emanations, a squeezing off of small portions of his/its nonphysical energetic divine material. In most accounts there are thirty emanations in fifteen complementary pairs, each getting slightly less of the divine material and therefore being slightly weaker. The emanations are called Aeons (eternities) and are mostly named personifications in Greek of abstract ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Rating Component Scores North America Q4 2020
    Corporate Rating Component Scores North America Q4 2020 FALSE NA Corporate Rating Component Scores Oct. 31, 2020 Corporate Rating Component Scores North America Methodology," which is the criteria we use for rating corporate industrial companies and utilities. We list the scores for the 2308 public ratings in NA that are within the scope of our corporate methodology, accompanied by charts that show the distribution of aggregated scores. We believe that the list and charts enhance benchmarking across industries and rating levels for all market participants. We disclose these scores in line with the information we provide in our rating research publications, such as research updates and full analyses. By releasing all scores for public corporate ratings in NA, S&P Global Ratings confirms its commitment to deliver greater transparency and insight into the ratings process and simplify access for all market participants. Ratings are organized alphabetically by industry sector. The scores reflect the building blocks of the corporate ratings framework (see chart 1). Modifiers and components related to our group rating methodology or government-related entity methodology are indicated only where they have a positive or negative effect on the rating. The report reflects corporate credit ratings and scores as of Oct. 31, 2020. This document will not be updated for future rating actions or score revisions. To keep it concise, the list only discloses scores for the main rated entity of larger corporate groups. We omit certain entities such as subsidiaries or holding companies where the ratings are linked to those on their parent companies. In this report, we highlight changes since Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Industry
    Your future in…. Space industry Introduction Our daily lives are influenced by what happens in space, much more so than we realise. The research from the space industry cascades down, affecting a wide range of technologies. It is estimated that up to 100,000 skilled jobs in the space sector will be created in the next 15 years. With such a positive outlook the opportunities for graduates look set to rise. While the great majority of roles are in science and “The space sector is growing rapidly technology, there are also opportunities in areas and society is increasingly such as law, policy, insurance, education, dependent on it; the possibilities manufacturing and tourism. for STEM graduates are limitless The industry is essentially split in two: upstream and it's a fantastic feeling to work and downstream. Upstream work is focused on in an area on the edge of human sending objects into space and space exploration, exploration.” Dr Ashley Cooke, while downstream utilises the research and Galileo Programme Manager, UK technology from upstream in a range of different Space Agency applications. Downstream is where greatest growth in the sector comes from and where the greatest number of opportunities are. The industry needs people who can translate upstream research into downstream applications. Work experience and skills development The Young Graduate Trainees (YGT) programme at the European Space Agency (ESA) is a year-long placement for Masters graduates, advertised in November. About 80 posts are available, both technical and non-technical. Current Master’s students can also apply for ESA’s student placements, lasting 3-6 months.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Exploration of Saturn 417-441, in Saturn in the 21St Century (Eds. KH Baines, FM Flasar, N Krupp, T Stallard)
    The Future Exploration of Saturn By Kevin H. Baines, Sushil K. Atreya, Frank Crary, Scott G. Edgington, Thomas K. Greathouse, Henrik Melin, Olivier Mousis, Glenn S. Orton, Thomas R. Spilker, Anthony Wesley (2019). pp 417-441, in Saturn in the 21st Century (eds. KH Baines, FM Flasar, N Krupp, T Stallard), Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316227220.014 14 The Future Exploration of Saturn KEVIN H. BAINES, SUSHIL K. ATREYA, FRANK CRARY, SCOTT G. EDGINGTON, THOMAS K. GREATHOUSE, HENRIK MELIN, OLIVIER MOUSIS, GLENN S. ORTON, THOMAS R. SPILKER AND ANTHONY WESLEY Abstract missions, achieving a remarkable record of discoveries Despite the lack of another Flagship-class mission about the entire Saturn system, including its icy satel- such as Cassini–Huygens, prospects for the future lites, the large atmosphere-enshrouded moon Titan, the ’ exploration of Saturn are nevertheless encoura- planet s surprisingly intricate ring system and the pla- ’ ging. Both NASA and the European Space net s complex magnetosphere, atmosphere and interior. Agency (ESA) are exploring the possibilities of Far from being a small (500 km diameter) geologically focused interplanetary missions (1) to drop one or dead moon, Enceladus proved to be exceptionally more in situ atmospheric entry probes into Saturn active, erupting with numerous geysers that spew – and (2) to explore the satellites Titan and liquid water vapor and ice grains into space some of fi Enceladus, which would provide opportunities for which falls back to form nearly pure white snow elds both in situ investigations of Saturn’s magneto- and some of which escapes to form a distinctive ring sphere and detailed remote-sensing observations around Saturn (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • International Planetary Probe Workshop Presentation to VEXAG
    International Planetary Probe Workshop Presentation to VEXAG Jim Cutts David Atkinson Bernard Bienstock Sushil Atreya November 4 2007 Topics • International Planetary Probe Workshop - Goals • Fifth International Planetary Probe Workshop (IPPW-5) – Held in Bordeaux, France, June 23-29, 2007 • Sixth International Planetary Probe Workshop (IPPW-6) – Will be held in Atlanta, Georgia, June 21-27, 2008 International Planetary Probe Workshop - Goals • To Review the state-of-the-art in science, mission design, engineering implementation and technology for the in situ robotic exploration of planets and satellites with atmospheres • To Share ideas, mission opportunities, and emerging technologies to enable future mission success • To Serve as a forum for discussions on innovative methodologies and techniques for future probe missions • To Involve young scientists and engineers in the field of entry, descent and flight in planetary atmospheres in an opportunity to learn from experienced researchers and practitioners • To Foster international collaboration among the communities of scientists, engineers, and mission designers interested in planetary probes. IPPW-5 Overview • Held in Bordeaux, France – 23 June – 29 June 2007 • 23-24 June: Short Course Controlled Entry And Descent Into Planetary Atmospheres • 25-29 June: Workshop • 9 sessions and posters • Attended by 200 scientists, engineers, students and policy makers – NASA centers and US industries – ESA and European industries – Research facilities throughout the world – Educators and students from • 8 US universities • 9 universities in Europe and Asia Short Course: Controlled Entry And Descent Into Planetary Atmospheres Day One - Lectures 1 Introduction 2 Separation and Arrival 3 Reference Atmospheres and Their Use 4 The Entry Phase 5 Impact of Atmospheric Composition on Science and Engineering 6 Impact of Atmospheric Electricity on Probes 7 Descent 8 Communications and Tracking Day One – Four Parallal Case Studies 1 Venus Lead: Tibor Balint (JPL) and Colin Wilson (Oxford) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sun Rings Terry Riley Terry Riley (B
    KRONOS QUARTET SUN RINGS TERRY RILEY TERRY RILEY (B. 1935) SUN RINGS (2002) FOR STRING QUARTET, CHORUS, AND PRE-RECORDED SPACESCAPES 1. SUN RINGS OVERTURE (1:24) 2. HERO DANGER (7:15) 3. BEEBOPTERISMO (7:14) 4. PLANET ELF SINDOORI (7:48) KRONOS QUARTET 5. EARTH WHISTLERS* (10:05) DAVID HARRINGTON, violin 6. EARTH/JUPITER KISS (6:38) JOHN SHERBA, violin 7. THE ELECTRON CYCLOTRON HANK DUTT, viola SUNNY YANG, cello FREQUENCY PARLOUR (5:59) 8. PRAYER CENTRAL* (16:44) * WITH VOLTI, ROBERT GEARY, ARTISTIC DIRECTOR 9. VENUS UPSTREAM (7:18) SOPRANO KELLY BALLOU+, YUHI AIZAWA COMBATTI, 10. ONE EARTH, ONE PEOPLE, ONE LOVE (9:03) SHAUNA FALLIHEE, ANDREA MICH MEZZO-SOPRANO LINDSEY MCLENNAN BURDICK, ELIZABETH KIMBLE, DIANA PRAY, COLBY SMITH ALTO KRISTINA BLEHM, MONICA FRAME, RACHEL RUSH, CELESTE WINANT TENOR BEN BARR, WILL BETTS, SAMUEL FAUSTINE, JULIAN KUSNADI BARITONE RODERICK LOWE, JEFFERSON PACKER, TIM SILVA, COLE THOMASON-REDUS BASS JEFF BENNETT, SIDNEY CHEN, PETER DENNIS, PHILIP SAUNDERS + SOLOIST Rings, about to have its premiere at the University of Iowa’s Hancher Auditorium. Contemplating the music of the spheres is, of course, a millennia-old pastime that has never gotten old. In this case, it was for Riley an occasion for both inner and outer space discovery. He had spent most of the Seventies as a composer, keyboard player, and educator determinedly moving away from musical notation towards a unique form of semi-improvised composition that embraced Indian raga, jazz, Renaissance vocal music, repetition, and elec- tronic phasing, all in an effort of all-around musical consciousness-raising. But when Kronos Quartet violinist David Harrington twisted his arm into writing a string quartet, an apparition of the beyond—the notion of a collector of all the nightly dreams on Earth—inspired Riley to find his way back to working with a traditional (if groundbreaking) ensemble.
    [Show full text]
  • Covering the Increased Liability of New Launch Markets
    32nd Space Symposium, Technical Track, Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States of America Presented on April 11-12, 2016 COVERING THE INCREASED LIABILITY OF NEW LAUNCH MARKETS Robert Williams, [email protected] Kevin Walsh, [email protected] ABSTRACT The next generation space race prize is the integration of space dependent technology reliably in modern society. This paper is offered as an examination of an expanding diverse space launch industry as well as the necessity for increased capacity of resources in the underwriting space. Consumers are already space application dependent. There are 1 billion GPS receivers already deployed and expected to grow to 7 billion by 2022. As an example, satellites transformed 800 analogue channels in 1991 to more than 25,000 digital channels today. Without GPS, money isn’t accessible from an ATM. Space plays a greater role in day-to-day life and liability coverage will become more important. If a satellite fails for example, businesses relying on satellite services to function may want to claim for lost income or expenses incurred. Growth of space business has been characterized by a shift away from military and the public over to the private sector. Space activity was largely funded through government bodies such as NASA, the European Space Agency or the Japanese Space Agency. With recent estimates by the Satellite Industry Association placing cumulative satellite industry revenues at over $195.2 billion, a number of private companies are successfully entering the space industry and space application world. Governments and space agencies, which were ordering and building space hardware themselves, are now shifting towards buying services from private companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D - Securities Held by Funds October 18, 2017 Annual Report of Activities Pursuant to Act 44 of 2010 October 18, 2017
    Report of Activities Pursuant to Act 44 of 2010 Appendix D - Securities Held by Funds October 18, 2017 Annual Report of Activities Pursuant to Act 44 of 2010 October 18, 2017 Appendix D: Securities Held by Funds The Four Funds hold thousands of publicly and privately traded securities. Act 44 directs the Four Funds to publish “a list of all publicly traded securities held by the public fund.” For consistency in presenting the data, a list of all holdings of the Four Funds is obtained from Pennsylvania Treasury Department. The list includes privately held securities. Some privately held securities lacked certain data fields to facilitate removal from the list. To avoid incomplete removal of privately held securities or erroneous removal of publicly traded securities from the list, the Four Funds have chosen to report all publicly and privately traded securities. The list below presents the securities held by the Four Funds as of June 30, 2017. 1345 AVENUE OF THE A 1 A3 144A AAREAL BANK AG ABRY MEZZANINE PARTNERS LP 1721 N FRONT STREET HOLDINGS AARON'S INC ABRY PARTNERS V LP 1-800-FLOWERS.COM INC AASET 2017-1 TRUST 1A C 144A ABRY PARTNERS VI L P 198 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST ABACUS PROPERTY GROUP ABRY PARTNERS VII L P 1MDB GLOBAL INVESTMENTS L ABAXIS INC ABRY PARTNERS VIII LP REGS ABB CONCISE 6/16 TL ABRY SENIOR EQUITY II LP 1ST SOURCE CORP ABB LTD ABS CAPITAL PARTNERS II LP 200 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST ABBOTT LABORATORIES ABS CAPITAL PARTNERS IV LP 21ST CENTURY FOX AMERICA INC ABBOTT LABORATORIES ABS CAPITAL PARTNERS V LP 21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY 4/15
    [Show full text]