DOCSLIB.ORG

The Lethal Consequences of Restraint

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Lethal Consequences of Restraint EQUIP FOR EQUALITY A SPECIAL REPORT from the Abuse Investigation Unit NATIONAL REVIEW OF RESTRAINT RELATED DEATHS OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES: The Lethal Consequences of Restraint UIP FO Q R E E TM Q Y U A L I T UIP FO Q R E E TM Q Y U A L I T Mission Established in 1985, the mission of Equip for Equality is to advance the human and civil rights of people with disabilities in Illinois. Equip for Equality is a private not- for-profit legal advocacy organization designated by the governor to operate the federally mandated Protection and Advocacy System (P&A) to safeguard the rights of people with physical and mental disabilities, including developmental disabilities and mental illness. Equip for Equality is the only comprehensive statewide advocacy organization for people with disabilities and their families. All individuals with a disability in Illinois (as defined by the ADA) are eligible for services, including children, senior citizens, and individuals in state-operated facilities, nursing homes, and community-based programs. Services, Programs, and Projects Abuse Investigation Unit works to prevent abuse, neglect, and deaths of children and adults with disabilities in community-based programs, nursing homes, and state institutions. The Unit works with public investigatory agencies to improve their performance and coordination with each other; conducts investigations of abuse and neglect cases; alerts service providers to dangerous conditions and practices. Public Policy Advocacy achieves changes in state legislation, public policies and programs to safeguard individual rights and personal safety, enhance choice and self- determination, and promote independence, productivity, and community integration. The Program drafts and secures passage of state legislation and participates in state regulatory and policy-making processes. It also undertakes in-depth policy research and reform projects on complex issues that have a significant impact on the lives of people with disabilities. Self-Advocacy Assistance offers free, one-on-one technical assistance to inform individuals about their rights, alternative options and strategies, and steps they may take to advocate on their own behalf or on behalf of a family member. Legal Services provides free legal advice and representation in administrative proceedings and federal and state court. The Program also engages in systems and impact litigation. Training Institute on Disability Rights provides education through seminars for people with disabilities and their families. Seminar topics include rights and responsibilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act, protections against employment discrimination, guardianship, advance directives and special education rights. UIP FO Q R E E TM Q Y U A L I T NATIONAL REVIEW OF RESTRAINT RELATED DEATHS OF CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES: The Lethal Consequences of Restraint This publication is made possible by funding support from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of Equip for Equality and do not represent the official views of these agencies. © Equip for Equality, 2011 UIP FO Q R E E TM Q Y U A L I T Authors and Expert Consultants Lana Norwood, M.S.S.W., Labor Relations Alternatives, Inc. J. Richard Ciccone, M.D., University of Rochester Medical Center Deborah M. Kennedy, J.D., Equip for Equality Abuse Investigation Unit Director Diane L. Faucher Moy, M.S.N., R.N., P.M.H.C.N.S.-B.C. Mary K. Allrich, M.S.N., R.N., L.P.C. Zena Naiditch, M.A., Equip for Equality President and C.E.O. Expert Consultants Jack McIntyre, M.D. John F. Erhart, M.D. Donna E. Sweet, M.D. William E. Golden, M.D., M.A.C.P. Frank Richeson, M.D. Thomas Bonfiglio, M.D. Equip for Equality Staff Members Mary Jo Kern, M.S. Gregg S. Brandush, J.D., R.N. 2 Th e Lethal Consequences of Restraint UIP FO Q R E E TM Q Y U A L I T National Review of Restraint-Related Deaths of Children and Adults with Disabilities: The Lethal Consequences of Restraint At age 9, Justin* was admitted to a residential treatment center for children ages 6 to 12. He died after he refused to follow a counselor’s instruction and lashed out at the staff. Justin, who weighed 104 pounds, was pushed against a door and pulled down to the fl oor by staff members. For seven minutes several staff members held him on the fl oor face-up with a 200-pound staff person lying across his chest. The coroner found Justin’s death to be the result of positional asphyxia due to physical restraint, with the manner of death identifi ed by the coroner as being “best deemed homicide.” Laura was 15 when she died at a residential program where she had been admitted after her mother refused to pick her up upon discharge from a state hospital. On the morning she died, Laura was not wearing socks. A staff member directed her to put socks on, and when she could fi nd none and put slippers on instead, the staff member ordered her to sit on the fl oor. When she refused, the staff member said she “fell” against the wall so hard the wall “broke.” Laura allegedly scratched a staff person, so two staff members physically restrained her in a seated position, her arms crossed in front of her body and pulled back tightly against her waist. She struggled for fi ve minutes and then appeared to calm down, but then she became unresponsive. Laura died four days later from complications of mechanical asphyxia compounded by her obesity and a seizure disorder. Martin was 23 and lived in a group home. He was autistic and had intellectual disabilities. He also had a therapy plan to help him if he became upset or aggressive. On the day he died, none of the staff in his home knew about his plan. When Martin became upset and tried to leave after running around the house, throwing things and disrobing, several staff members took him to his room, where he was forced face-down on the bed. One staff member sat on him, holding Martin’s arms behind his back with one hand and pushing Martin’s back down with the other. Martin died of asphyxia, with the manner of death listed as homicide. Loretta was 88 when she was admitted to a nursing home. In the two days before her death, she had been sitting in her wheelchair restrained with a lap belt, and three times a staff person found the use of the belt unsafe, as it had not been effective at keeping Loretta properly seated in the chair. On the day Loretta died, *Th e names of the individuals in the report have been changed to protect confi dentiality. National Review of Restraint Related Deaths 3 UIP FO Q R E E TM Q Y U A L I T staff members reported twice fi nding her seated on the fl oor with the lap belt still attached to the chair, once with the belt around her chest and a second time with Loretta gasping because the belt was around her neck. No changes were made to Loretta’s care plan. At 5:30 p.m. Loretta was in her room seated in the wheelchair and restrained by the lap belt. At 6:10 Loretta was found dead on the fl oor with the lap belt around her neck. Loretta died of positional asphyxia. Executive Summary Restraint remains one of the most controversial and dangerous measures used today in settings that provide services to people with disabilities. Restraint is an intrusive and dangerous intervention that can have signifi cant adverse implications for the physical and emotional well-being of the individual who is restrained. The use of restraints continues to represent a signifi cant risk to adults and children with mental illness or developmental disabilities in any setting where restraints are used, as evidenced by the growing number of documented deaths.1 The risk that restraint poses to people with disabilities is heightened by an oversight system that remains seriously fl awed. Current reporting of deaths related to restraints is neither complete nor comprehensive. The total number of children and adults, including seniors, who die each year as a result of being put in restraints, is unknown. Current reporting requirements do not include all publicly or privately funded facilities utilizing restraint.2 As initially reported in a 1998 series in the Hartford Courant, there was for many years – and continues to be – no comprehensive oversight system in place for monitoring restraint usage and compliance with the law. There continues to be no federal or state government agency responsible for collecting comprehensive data on restraint usage and deaths across all settings where restraints are used. In an effort to address this critical issue, Equip for Equality, in cooperation with the National Disabilities Rights Network (NDRN), which is the national membership organization for the Protection and Advocacy (P&A) Systems, and with medical, nursing and forensic experts, has conducted the “National Review of Restraint- Related Deaths of Children and Adults with Disabilities.” In addition to co-authoring the report, medical, nursing and forensic experts also provided in-depth analysis of the deaths. In addition to the expert analysis, Equip for Equality convened other experts to review the fi ndings and develop recommendations to Congress and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for reform. The 61 deaths examined in connection with this study reveal disturbing details of the end of life for children as young as 9 and adults as old as 95.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nursing Service Guidelines FALL PREVENTION MULTIDISCIPLINARY FALL PREVENTION
    Nursing Service Guidelines FALL PREVENTION Title: MULTIDISCIPLINARY FALL PREVENTION Responsibility: Multidisciplinary staff need to take an active role in fall prevention. Equipment: Fall identification wrist bands, fall identification materials, and fall prevention equipment. Purpose: Since research has identified that numerous intrinsic and extrinsic variables can contribute to a patient’s risk of falling during a hospitalization, it is essential to determine the risk factors that place the patient at the greatest (highest) risk. By utilizing strategies that take into consideration the fall risk assessment score, clinical judgement, medication management, the patients mental status, and the patients ability to ambulate, it is intended that this approach will help prevent patient falls. The purpose of this guideline is to provide multidisciplinary staff with fall risk assessment tools that can be used to assist them in properly identifying those patients at risk for falling and determining interventions. General Information: A fall is defined as any unplanned descent to the floor, with or without injury (National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators [NDNQI], 2015). A fall may be either unassisted or assisted (where someone helps to ‘break’ the fall by helping the patient to the floor) and the NDNQI definition also includes falls where a patient lands on a surface where you would not expect to find the patient. University of Toledo Medical Center’s (UTMCs) fall injury level categories: • None • Minor (dressing, ice, cleaning, or elevation) • Moderate (suturing, splinting, or steri-strips/skin glue) • Major* (surgery, casting, traction, or neuro consult) • Death* (died as a result of injuries sustained from the fall) *if a patient’s fall has a major injury level or results in a death, the department manager or house supervisor and Quality Management need to be notified immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018; 3(1)
    ADVANCED JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE. 2019; 3(1): e7 Ziaei et al Review Article DOI: 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.117 Management of Violence and Aggression in Emergency Environment; a Narrative Review of 200 Related Articles Maryam Ziaei1, Ali Massoudifar2, Ali Rajabpour-Sanati3, Ali-Mohammad Pourbagher-Shahri3, Ali Abdolrazaghnejad1* 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Khatam-Al-Anbia Hospital, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. 2. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandarabbas, Iran. 3. Faculty of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran. *Corresponding author: Ali Abdolrazaghnejad; Email: [email protected] Published online: 2018-11-29 Abstract Context: The aim of this study is to reviewing various approaches for dealing with agitated patients in emergency department (ED) including of chemical and physical restraint methods. Evidence acquisition: This review was conducted by searching “Violence,” “Aggression,” and “workplace violence” keywords in these databases: PubMed, Scopus, EmBase, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Database, and Google Scholar. In addition to using keywords for finding the papers, the related article capability was used to find more papers. From the found papers, published papers from 2005 to 2018 were chosen to enter the paper pool for further review. Results: Ultimately, 200 papers were used in this paper to conduct a comprehensive review regarding violence management in ED. The results were categorized as prevention, verbal methods, pharmacological interventions and physical restraint. Conclusion: In this study various methods of chemical and physical restraint methods were reviewed so an emergency medicine physician be aware of various available choices in different clinical situations for agitated patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Management of Children and Adolescents with Acute Mental Health Or Behavioral Problems
    CLINICAL REPORT Guidance for the Clinician in Rendering Pediatric Care Evaluation and Management of Children and Adolescents With Acute Mental Health or Behavioral Problems. Part I: Common Clinical Challenges of Patients With Mental Health and/or Behavioral Emergencies Thomas H. Chun, MD, MPH, FAAP, Sharon E. Mace, MD, FAAP, FACEP, Emily R. Katz, MD, FAAP, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, COMMITTEE ON PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE COMMITTEE INTRODUCTION This document is copyrighted and is property of the American Academy of Pediatrics and its Board of Directors. All authors have Mental health problems are among the leading contributors to the global fi led confl ict of interest statements with the American Academy of Pediatrics. Any confl icts have been resolved through a process 1 burden of disease. Unfortunately, pediatric populations are not spared of approved by the Board of Directors. The American Academy of mental health problems. In the United States, 21% to 23% of children and Pediatrics has neither solicited nor accepted any commercial involvement in the development of the content of this publication. 2, 3 adolescents have a diagnosable mental health or substance use disorder. Clinical reports from the American Academy of Pediatrics benefi t from Among patients of emergency departments (EDs), 70% screen positive for expertise and resources of liaisons and internal (AAP) and external 4 reviewers. However, clinical reports from the American Academy of at least 1 mental health disorder, 23% meet criteria for 2 or more mental Pediatrics may not refl ect the views of the liaisons or the organizations health concerns, 5 45% have a mental health problem resulting in impaired or government agencies that they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • September 9, 2015 Andrew M. Slavitt, Acting Administrator Centers For
    September 9, 2015 Andrew M. Slavitt, Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20201 Attention: CMS–3260-P – Reform of Requirements for Long-Term Care Facilities Submitted Electronically Dear Mr. Slavitt: We are writing on behalf of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform to comment on the proposed regulations to reform the Requirements of Participation for Long-Term Care Facilities that were published in the Federal Register on July 16, 2015. CANHR is a statewide, nonprofit advocacy organization dedicated to improving the choices, care and quality of life for California’s long term care consumers, their families and loved ones. This letter solely addresses our comments concerning dementia care and chemical restraints. We are submitting comments on other aspects of the proposed regulations by separate letter. The rewrite of the Requirements of Participation presents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to finally stop the pervasive chemical restraint of nursing home residents who suffer from dementia and to establish a humane standard of care that will achieve the goals of the Nursing Home Reform Law of 1987. CMS must seize this opportunity to comprehensively address this enduring public health crisis or it will doom another generation of dementia victims to the horrific abuses they face in nursing homes today. Ending this abuse is the defining issue of our time in nursing homes. Nearly 30 years after the Reform Law required nursing homes to offer compassionate care in a homelike setting, far too many facilities routinely drug residents with dementia into submission.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings
    STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ) ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Case Nos. 09-5360 ) 09-5363 GULF COAST MEDICAL CENTER, ) 09-5364 LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM, ) 09-5365 ) Respondent. ) ) RECOMMENDED ORDER Pursuant to notice to all parties, a final hearing was conducted in this case on January 25 through 29, 2010, in Fort Myers, Florida, before Administrative Law Judge R. Bruce McKibben of the Division of Administrative Hearings. The parties were represented as set forth below. APPEARANCES For Petitioner: Andrea M. Lang, Esquire Agency for Health Care Administration 2295 Victoria Avenue, Room 346C Fort Myers, Florida 33901 For Respondent: W. David Watkins, Esquire Watkins & Associates, P.A. Post Office Box 15828 Tallahassee, Florida 32317-5828 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES The issues in this case are set forth in 11 separate counts within the four consolidated cases: Case No. 09-5360 Count I--Whether Respondent failed to properly monitor and care for a patient in restraints. Count II--Whether Respondent failed to ensure the physician's plan of care for patient was implemented. Case No. 09-5363 Count I--Whether Respondent failed to properly implement the physician's plan of care for patient. Case No. 09-5364 Count I--Whether Respondent failed to ensure a patients' right to privacy. Count II--Whether Respondent failed to ensure that food was served in the prescribed safe temperature zone. Count III--Whether Respondent failed to ensure that only authorized personnel had access to locked areas where medications were stored. Count IV--Whether Respondent failed to perform proper nursing assessments of a patient.
    [Show full text]
  • Hospital Isolation and Restraint
    RULES OF DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES CHAPTER 0940-3-6 HOSPITAL ISOLATION AND RESTRAINT TABLE OF CONTENTS 0940-3-6-.01 Scope 0940-3-6-.11 Behavioral Criteria for Release 0940-3-6-.02 Definitions 0940-3-6-.12 Monitoring and Assessment of Continued 0940-3-6-.03 Purpose of Isolation or Restraint Need 0940-3-6-.04 Application of This Chapter 0940-3-6-.13 Location of Use 0940-3-6-.05 Policies and Procedures 0940-3-6-.14 Termination 0940-3-6-.06 Initiation of Isolation or Physical Restraint in 0940-3-6-.15 Notification of Legal Surrogates the Absence of a Licensed Independent 0940-3-6-.16 Notification of Family/Significant Other Practitioner 0940-3-6-.17 Internal Reviews 0940-3-6-.07 Authorization 0940-3-6-.18 Performance Improvement Activities 0940-3-6-.08 Length of Authorization 0940-3-6-.19 Training 0940-3-6-.09 Renewal 0940-3-6-.20 Reporting 0940-3-6-.10 Assessments 0940-3-6-.01 SCOPE. (1) This chapter applies to all facilities providing inpatient mental health services in a hospital without regard to source of licensure, certification or accreditation. Isolation and restraint may be used in such settings only in compliance with this chapter. (2) Isolation or restraint in mental health treatment settings other than hospitals is governed by chapters applicable to those settings. Chemical restraint is permissible only in a hospital and in compliance with this chapter. Authority: T.C.A. §§4-4-103, 4-5-202, 4-5-204, 33-1-120, 33-1-302, 33-1-305, 33-1-309, 33-2-301, and 33-2-302.
    [Show full text]
  • Restraint Module for Travel Nurses
    Restraints Objectives Recognize federal regulations related to use of restraint. Distinguish between behavioral and non-behavioral restraint application requirements. Competent to apply restraints Understand proper documentation of restraint use Knowledge of restraint monitoring Knowledge of alternatives to restraint Knowledge of restraint discontinuation 1 Joint Commission and CMS Requirements The Joint Commission and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) standards related to restraint use focus on limiting the use of restraints and seclusion to: . Emergency situations when a person is at imminent risk of harming himself or herself or others . When nonphysical safety measures have been ineffective . When safety requires an immediate physical response . Restraint use MUST be Ordered by the Physician AND MUST BE APPROPRIATELY DOCUMENTED Hospital policy on Restraints . The hospital uses restraint or seclusion only when it can be clinically justified or when warranted by patient behavior that threatens the physical safety of the patient, staff, or others . Restraints should be considered once less restrictive interventions have been considered/tried and are determined to be inadequate for the clinical purpose. Any use of restraint will be discontinued at the earliest possible time, based on reassessment of the patient’s continuing need for the restraint . Restraint is never used as a means of coercion, convenience, or retaliation by staff. 2 Definitions RESTRAINTS . A restraint is any manual method, physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a patient to move his or her arms, legs, body, or head freely. A restraint is a drug or medication when it is used as a restriction to manage the patient’s behavior or restrict the patient’s freedom of movement and is not a standard treatment or dosage for the patient’s condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State Hospital State of Florida Operating Procedure Department of No
    FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL STATE OF FLORIDA OPERATING PROCEDURE DEPARTMENT OF NO. 150-14 CHILDREN AND FAMILIES CHATTAHOOCHEE, April 26, 2017 Health MEDICAL RESTRAINTS & SAFETY DEVICES 1. Purpose: This operating procedure prescribes the use of medical restraints and safety devices at Florida State Hospital. It establishes guidelines and methods to be employed by Hospital staff in restraining residents when the need is of a medical nature. 2. Scope: This procedure applies to all units at Florida State Hospital which use medical restraints. 3. References: a. Florida Statutes, Chapter 394 b. Florida Administrative Code 59A-3, Hospital Licensure c. Restraint Proper Environment OBRA Restraint Guidelines d. State Operations Manual, Appendix A, Survey Protocol, Regulations and Interpretive Guidelines for Hospitals, e. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HHS. §482.13 Conditions of Participation: Patient’s Rights 4. Philosophy of Florida State Hospital: Medical restraints of residents are methods of last resort and shall not be used unless lesser restrictive methods of intervention have been attempted and determined to be ineffective. Residents will be fully evaluated for restraint elimination and/or reduction at the time of each recovery team review (monthly, bi-monthly, 6-months and annual) and at the time of the 180-day review. Medical restraints shall be applied/ utilized in a manner that is most comfortable to the resident while preserving his/her dignity. Medical Restraints and safety devices shall NOT: a. impair neurovascular integrity; b. impair respiration; c. be tied to bedrails or moving parts of a gerichair or wheelchair; d. prevent residents from eating comfortably; e. interfere with toilet needs; This Operating Procedure supersedes: Operating Procedure 150-14 dated April 21, 2016 OFFICE OF PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY: Medical Services DISTRIBUTION: See Training Requirements Matrix April26,2017 FSHOP150-14 f.
    [Show full text]
  • Slides and Handouts
    Organizing Clinical Information Systems to Manage and Improve Care Jennifer Allan, BSN, RN Methodist Healthcare System Jane Englebright, PhD, RN Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation Our Documentation System 1994 to 1996 • Four sites using a computerized clinical documentation system – Two using NANDA format – Two using NIC format • One site on paper Unresolved Problems Included: • Increased charting time, increased cost • Ambiguous, complex care plans • Hundreds of documentation screens • Physician dissatisfaction with nursing • Physician dissatisfaction with medical record • Fragmented, duplicative and conflicting information in the medical record “Fix” the System or De-install! • Meet legal, regulatory & clinical requirements • Decrease documentation time • Reduce costs • Eliminate repetition • Streamline record • Automate reports • Introduce interdisciplinary documentation • Lay foundation for quality monitoring • IMPROVE PATIENT CARE Two Early Rewrites Used Established Nursing Taxonomies Advantages Disadvantages NANDA Well known to Foreign to non- nurses nurses Non-exclusive diagnoses NIC Facilitates Long look-up for charging and interventions acuity Does not tie to care plan Review of Literature • NIC (Nursing Intervention Classification) • NANDA (North American Nursing Diagnosis Association) • Charting by Exception • Focus Charting • Problem Oriented (SOAP) • Practice Guidelines No current methodologies supported our vision: Concepts from NANDA, Our NIC, Charting by Goals Exception, Systems Theory Patient Centered Documentation ©
    [Show full text]
  • Restraint Prevalence Tools
    Restraint Prevalence Tools NURSING BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES EVALUATION USER GUIDE November 2006 Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. Publication does not imply any endorsement of these views by either of the participating partners of the Nursing Best Practice Research Unit, which include members of the University of Ottawa faculty and members of the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO). 158 Pearl Street / 158, rue Pearl School of Nursing / Toronto ON M5H 1L3 CANADA École des sciences infirmières 451 Smyth 416 599-1925 Ottawa ON K1H 8M5 CANADA 416 599-1926 613 562-5800 (8407) 613 562-5658 http://www.nbpru.ca/ Nursing Best Practice Guidelines Evaluation User Guide Copyright © 2006 by the NBPRU Printed in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada All rights reserved. Reproduction, in whole or in part, of this document without the acknowledgement of the authors and copyright holder is prohibited. The recommended citation is: Davies B, Danseco E, Ploeg J, Heslin, K, Stansfield M, Santos J & Edwards, N. (2006). Nursing Best Practice Guideline Evaluation User Guide: Restraint Prevalence Tools. Nursing Best Practice Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Canada. pp. 1-20. Nursing Best Practice Guidelines Evaluation User Guide Acknowledgements This user guide was based on an evaluation project awarded to Barbara Davies and Nancy Edwards with the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO) and funded by the Government of Ontario. The authors are grateful for the support of the Nursing Secretariat of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC), in particular the Chief Nursing Officer, Sue Matthews. The authors would also like to acknowledge the contributions of Tazim Virani and RNAO staff, clinical sites that pilot-tested the evaluation tool, members of the evaluation team and project staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Nurse Orientation 2020
    CHI Saint Joseph Health: Agency Nurse Orientation 2020 Table of Contents Welcome and Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 4 Mission, Vision and Values .............................................................................................................................. 4 Standards of Conduct ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Orientation Information .................................................................................................................................. 5 CHI Saint Joseph Health Nursing Vision ................................................................................................... 6 Confidentiality .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Disaster Codes .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Dress Code ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Environment of Care ................................................................................................................................ 9 Incident Reporting .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CMS Restraint Training Requirements H a N D B O O K the CMS Restraint Training Requirements Handbook Is Published by Hcpro, Inc
    THE CM Restraint Training Requirements As of January 2007, the Centers for HANDBOOK Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires that your hospital comply with new Conditions of Participation for patient restraint and seclusion. The new requirements focus on patient rights and include additional staff training requirements regarding restraint and seclusion. This portable handbook from HCPro is the perfect training tool to help staff members comply with the new CMS restraint and seclu- sion rules. Concise and easy to use, this handbook explains the specifics of the new training requirements, including the following prescriptive requirements: • Application of restraints • Implementation of seclusion • Monitoring of patients in restraint/seclusion • Assessment of patients in restraint/seclusion • Providing care for a patient in restraint/seclusion It also includes sample competency assessment “skill sheets” for staff who are involved in restraint and seclusion. For additional products about CMS compliance, visit HCPro’s online CMSRT | 200 Hoods Lane | Marblehead, MA | 01945 The CMS Restraint Training Requirements H a n d b o o k The CMS Restraint Training Requirements Handbook is published by HCPro, Inc. Copyright © 2007 HCPro, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. 5 4 3 2 1 ISBN 978-1-60146-068-4 No part of this publication may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without prior written consent of HCPro, Inc., or the Copyright Clearance Center (978/750-8400). Please notify us immediately if you have received an unauthorized copy. HCPro, Inc., provides information resources for the healthcare industry. HCPro, Inc., is not affiliated in any way with The Joint Commission, which owns the JCAHO and Joint Commission trademarks.
    [Show full text]