Nestlé in Society
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Veggie Planet 2017
The economy: Our enemy? Big corporations: Friend, enemy or partner of the vegan movement? Renato Pichler, Swissveg-President Kurt Schmidinger, Founder „Future Food“ Talk on Nov. 2017 for CARE in Vienna 1 Who we are Renato Pichler • Since 24 years vegan • Founder and CEO of the V-label-project (since 1996) • Since 1993 I have been working full-time for the largest Swiss vegetarian and vegan organisation: Swissveg • I am also in the board of the European Vegetarian Union and Das Tier + Wir (animal ethics education in schools) Kurt Schmidinger • Master in geophysics and doctor in food science also software-engineer and animal rights activist • Founder and CEO of „Future Food“ • Scientific board member of Albert-Schweitzer-Stiftung, VEBU, GFI, etc. 2 What should we buy? When we buy a product: We support the producer and the merchant. If we buy meat, we support the meat-industry. If we buy a vegan product, we support the vegan industry. 3 What should we buy? Consequences of the success of the vegan movement: ● even meat-producers have a vegan product-range ● big corporations are interested in the vegan-market Should a vegan buy a vegan product from a meat-producer of a big corporation? 4 Role Play Kurt Opponinger: I’m against it! Kurt Proponinger: I support every vegan product! ? 5 Defining the goals 1) Simplifying life for vegans 2) Reduce meat consumption – increase consumption of vegan products 3) Establishing vegan as the norm in society 4) Support the small pure vegan-shops/producers Depending on the main goal, the optimal procedure can change. -
Bottled Water Market in Lebanon: Refreshingly Successful BLOMINVEST BANK
BLOMINVEST The Bottled Water Market in Lebanon: Refreshingly Successful BANK December 02nd, 2016 Contact Information Research Analyst: Riwa Daou [email protected] Head of Research: Marwan Mikhael [email protected] Research Department Tel: +961 1 991 784 When you’re scrolling down the supermarket aisle looking for water to quench your thirst, you’re most likely going to pick up any water bottle off the shelves. After all, they’re all the same right? The reality is that each bottled water brand is different from the other. It’s needless to dwell on the difference between sparkling and still water but little is known about the variations between different brands of still water. In fact, each brand has a different PH, meaning that the acidity or the alkalinity of each brand varies. While all the brands may contain Calcium, Chloride, Bicarbonate, Magnesium, Nitrate, Potassium, Silica, Sodium, Sulfates and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), each brand contains these elements in different proportions as shown in the figure below. Numerous other factors also set bottled water brands apart; the constancy of the water’s composition throughout the year, the source of the water and whether or not it undergoes modifications after it is collected. Based on this, we can group bottled water into four major types. The Bottled Water Market in Lebanon: Refreshingly S A L Successful Natural mineral water is obtained directly from underground sources protected from pollution risks. Its mineral composition stays constant throughout the year and is bottled at the source. The minerals contained in this type of water are claimed to have health benefits. -
Nestlé and Water Sustainability, Protection, Stewardship Nestlé and Water Sustainability, Protection, Stewardship
Good Food, Good Life Nestlé and Water Sustainability, Protection, Stewardship Nestlé and Water Sustainability, Protection, Stewardship Table of contents Case studies 3 Message from the CEO 17 From spas to a world market The history of bottled water around the world 5 Water, a scarce and renewable resource 23 France Sustainable development around sources 7 Nestlé, the world’s leading food 24 Argentina and beverage company Strengthening water resource protection 25 France 8 Nestlé’s commitment Preventing forest fires to sustainable water use 28 France 13 The Nestlé Water Policy Préférence, a partnership for sustainable milk production 14 Sustainable economic growth 31 Egypt Closed loop circuits to reduce water 18 Water and the environment and energy consumption 21 The water cycle 31 South Africa 22 Actively protecting water resources Saving water through employee involvement 27 Water in the Nestlé supply chain 32 Italy 44 The Nestlé Environmental Management System Optimising water use in factories 47 Environmental sponsorship 34 India Continuously improving waste water 50 Social aspects management 52 Relations with employees 34 Thailand 54 Meeting consumer needs Recycling suitable water streams 56 Involvement in the community 38 France Innovating the glassmaking process 61 Nestlé Research and Development 40 Vietnam Packaging renovation improves 63 The future environmental performance 40 Saudi Arabia A new life for plastic caps 46 Environmental management system Appointing “Environmental Guards” 48 From Italy to Tibet Cleaning up “the roof of the world” 49 Hungary Preserving Balaton National Park 53 Nestlé Waters Alacarte training to improve performance 57 USA, Mexico, Philippines and France Educating the water stewards of the future 58 South Africa Capacity building in water resource management 59 France, USA, Spain Water education through guided tours and exhibitions Nestlé and Water Sustainability, Protection, Stewardship 2 3 Message from the CEO Water is essential for life. -
STANDING COMMITTEE MINUTES City of Spokane Urban Development Committee 11/13/2017 - FINAL
STANDING COMMITTEE MINUTES City of Spokane Urban Development Committee 11/13/2017 - FINAL Attendance Council President Ben Stuckart, Council Member Mumm, Council Member Karen Stratton, Council Member Laurie Kinnear, Council Member Amber Waldref, Council Member Mike Fagan, Council Member Breean Beggs, Gavin Cooley, Jonathan Mallahan, Andrew Worlock, Hannalee Allers, Nathen Calene, Anna Everano, Jacob Fraley, Jacqui Halvorson, Brian McClatchey, Adam McDaniel, Skyler Oberst, Teri Stripes, Ali Brast, Eldon Brown, Laura Williams Non-City Employees: Karl Otterstrom - STA Approval of Minutes: The approval of the meeting minutes for October was deferred until the December Urban Development Committee Meeting. Agenda Items: 1. Strategic Investments – Council President Stuckart Council President Stuckart briefed the Committee regarding this item. Please see attached briefing paper. 2. Skywalk Permitting Ordinance – Council President Stuckart Council President Stuckart briefed the Committee regarding this item. Please see attached briefing paper and ordinance. 3. Resolution Opposing the House of Representatives Tax Cuts & Jobs “Tax Reform” Bill – Council President Stuckart Council President Stuckart briefed the Committee regarding this item. Please see attached briefing paper and resolution. 4. Briefing on the Monroe Street Business Support Plan – Council Member Mumm Council Member Mumm briefed the Committee regarding this item. 5. Residential Parking Enforcement: discussion – Council Member Stratton Council Member Stratton briefed the Committee regarding this item. This was a discussion item only pertaining to certain regulations regarding parking vehicles on streets and the rules that apply. 6. A Rezone from Residential Single Family to Residential Single Family Compact for the Ivory Abbey near the Perry District – Ali Brast Ali Brast, Development Services Center, Briefed the Committee regarding this item. -
Marketer Profiles Yearbook, Updated for Annual 2008
DECEMBER 31, 2007 DATACENTER: MARKETER PROFILES YEARBOOK 50 LEADING NATIONAL ADVERTISERS UPDATED FOR AD AGE’S ANNUAL 2008 RANKING 0F PROFILES MORE ONLINE: INDEX 100 LEADING OF THE TOP AD SPENDERS BY TO AD AGE’S NATIONAL TOP 50 U.S. MEDIUM AND BRAND; ANNUAL ADVERTISERS ADVERTISERS MARKET SHARE DATA 2008 PAGE 3 PAGE 5 AdAge.com/DataCenter AdAge.com/annual08 This document, and information contained therein, is the copyrighted property of Crain Communications Inc. and The Ad Age Group (© Copyright 2007) and is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You may not reproduce, display on a website, distribute, sell or republish this document, or the information contained therein, without the prior written consent of The Ad Age Group. Revised Feb. 1, 2008 Advertising Age | December 31, 2007 | 2 ANNUAL 2008 WHAT’S INSIDE THE YEARBOOK Looking for more information on WELCOME TO THE Marketer Profiles Yearbook, updated for marketers, media Advertising Age’s Annual 2008. This yearbook is a compan- and agencies? See the index to Ad ion to the Annual, which Ad Age published Dec. 31, 2007, Age’s Annual in print and at AdAge.com/annual08. 2008 for links to Inside this yearbook, you’ll find detailed profiles of the deeper data: nation’s 50 largest advertisers. Content includes ad spending AdAge.com/annual08 broken down by medium and brand; listings of manage- ment and marketing executives; a tally of agencies and key agency executives; and financial results. Want to know more Inside about agencies that work for these marketers? Download Ad LNA RANKING Age’s 2007 Agency Profiles Yearbook, a 107-page PDF book Leading National Advertisers ranked one available for download from the DataCenter at AdAge.com. -
Lna 2006 Profiles J.Qxp
1 | Advertising Age | June 26, 2006 SpecialSpecial ReportReport:100 Profiles LEADING NATIONAL ADVERTISERSSupplement SUPPLEMENT June 26, 2006 100 LEADING NATIONAL ADVERTISERS Profiles of the top 100 U.S. marketers in this 51st annual ranking INSIDE TOP 100 RANKING COMPANY PROFILES SPONSORED BY The nation’s leading marketers Lead marketing personnel, ranked by U.S. advertising brands, agencies, agency expenditures for 2005. contacts, as well as advertising Includes data from TNS Media spending by media and brand, Intelligence and Ad Age’s sales, earnings and more for proprietary estimates of the country’s 100 largest unmeasured spending. PAGE 8 advertisers PAGE 10 This document, and information contained therein, is the copyrighted property of Crain Communications Inc. and The Ad Age Group (© Copyright 2006) and is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You may not reproduce, display on a website, distribute, sell or republish this document, or information contained therein, without prior written consent of The Ad Age Group. Are proud to connect you with the leading CMOs See all the interviews at adage.com/point LAUNCHING JUNE 28 © 2006 Crain Communications Inc. www.adage.com 3 | Advertising Age | June 26, 2006 Special Report 100 LEADING NATIONAL ADVERTISERS SUPPLEMENT ABOUT THIS PROFILE EDITION THE 51ST ANNUAL 100 Leading National the Top 100 ($40.13 billion) and for all measured spending in 18 national media, Advertisers Report crowned acquisition- advertisers ($122.79 billion) in the U.S. Yellow Pages Association contributed ladened Procter & Gamble Co. as the top U.S. ad spending by ad category: This spending in Yellow Pages and TNS Marx leader, passing previous kingpen General chart (Page 6) breaks out 18 measured Promotion Intelligence provided free- Motors Corp. -
Grocery Goliaths
HOW FOOD MONOPOLIES IMPACT CONSUMERS About Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch works to ensure the food, water and fish we consume is safe, accessible and sustainable. So we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of where their food comes from, keep clean, affordable, public tap water flowing freely to our homes, protect the environmental quality of oceans, force government to do its job protecting citizens, and educate about the importance of keeping shared resources under public control. Food & Water Watch California Office 1616 P St. NW, Ste. 300 1814 Franklin St., Ste. 1100 Washington, DC 20036 Oakland, CA 94612 tel: (202) 683-2500 tel: (510) 922-0720 fax: (202) 683-2501 fax: (510) 922-0723 [email protected] [email protected] foodandwaterwatch.org Copyright © December 2013 by Food & Water Watch. All rights reserved. This report can be viewed or downloaded at foodandwaterwatch.org. HOW FOOD MONOPOLIES IMPACT CONSUMERS Executive Summary . 2 Introduction . 3 Supersizing the Supermarket . 3 The Rise of Monolithic Food Manufacturers. 4 Intense consolidation throughout the supermarket . 7 Consumer choice limited. 7 Storewide domination by a few firms . 8 Supermarket Strategies to Manipulate Shoppers . 9 Sensory manipulation . .10 Product placement . .10 Slotting fees and category captains . .11 Advertising and promotions . .11 Conclusion and Recommendations. .12 Appendix A: Market Share of 100 Grocery Items . .13 Appendix B: Top Food Conglomerates’ Widespread Presence in the Grocery Store . .27 Methodology . .29 Endnotes. .30 Executive Summary Safeway.4 Walmart alone sold nearly a third (28.8 5 Groceries are big business, with Americans spending percent) of all groceries in 2012. -
Air Products' Hydrogen Fueling Technology to Power Nestle Waters' Warehouse Forklift Conversion
Air Products' Hydrogen Fueling Technology to Power Nestle Waters' Warehouse Forklift Conversion April 9, 2009 7:01 AM ET LEHIGH VALLEY, Pa., April 9 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Air Products (NYSE: APD), a global leader in hydrogen fueling and infrastructure, today announced the signing of a long-term agreement with Nestle Waters North America, Inc. to supply hydrogen and hydrogen fueling station technology for Nestle's Dallas, Tex. facility, where it will be used to fuel a fleet of approximately 32 Class I hydrogen fuel cell powered forklifts to be used in daily operations. Nestle Waters is in the process of expanding its bottling and warehousing operations in Dallas and is converting its materials handling equipment to hydrogen fuel cell forklifts. The fueling station is to be installed and operational during the second quarter of 2009. "This is a leading edge decision made by Nestle Waters to convert its materials handling system and use hydrogen as an energy carrier. It is a move that will provide operational, economic and environmental benefits for this bottling facility. Hydrogen fueling technology for materials handling applications is proven and cost-effective," said Tom Joseph, business development manager for Hydrogen Energy Systems at Air Products. "This project also further strengthens our collaboration with Plug Power in providing alternative energy solutions." "This project is consistent with our commitment to environmental stewardship and sustainable 'green' solutions for which Nestle Waters North America, Inc. aspires. I continue to be encouraged by the enthusiastic support from the front lines to senior leadership to introduce this capability and explore the responsible alternative energy options," said Christopher Lyon, process improvement manager for Nestle Waters Fleet Services. -
The Impact of Water Protection Measures in the Vittel Impluvium on Recreational Values: a Choice Experiment with Local Residents
The impact of water protection measures in the Vittel impluvium on recreational values: A choice experiment with local residents Tristan Amiri1, Jens Abildtrup2, Serge Garcia 2, Claire Montagné-Huck 2 Preliminary draft 08/09/2020 Abstract Actions undertaken for the protection of source water catchment areas by mineral water companies also produce positive externalities. Mineral waters create value for the water companies and its consumers, but for the territory and the local population also, in particular through the environmental and social services (e.g., habitats, landscape, and recreation) jointly produced with the protection of water quality. This paper aims at assessing the environmental and social preferences of the local population of Vittel (France) and surroundings, the area where Nestlé Waters produces the natural mineral waters of VITTEL®, CONTREX® and HEPAR®. From a choice experiment (CE) method, we test different scenarios of recreation activities considering two types of recreational areas: the countryside and the forest. While most of attributes are common to both scenarios, some are also specific to the forest and others to the countryside. Keywords: Mineral Water Company; Vittel; Water quality protection; Environmental and recreational services; Choice Experiment. 1 Université de Lorraine, Université de Strasbourg, AgroParisTech, CNRS, INRAE, BETA, 54000 Nancy, France. [email protected] 2 Université de Lorraine, Université de Strasbourg, AgroParisTech, CNRS, INRAE, BETA, 54000 Nancy, France. 1 1. Introduction Nestlé waters is the world leader in the sector of bottled water. In France eight brands of mineral natural or spring waters are distributed by Nestlé waters (PERRIER®/PERRIER FINES BULLES®, VITTEL®, HÉPAR®, CONTREX®, S.PELLEGRINO®, NESTLÉ PURE LIFE® et ACQUA PANNA®). -
The World Health Organization Is Taking Cash Handouts from Junk Food Giants by Vigilant Citizen October 23, 2012
The World Health Organization is Taking Cash Handouts from Junk Food Giants By Vigilant Citizen October 23, 2012 The World Health Organization (WHO) is the United Nationʼs “public health” arm and has 194 member states. While its official mission is “the attainment by all people of the highest possible level of health“, it is also clear that it works according to a specific agenda, one that laid out by the world elite and the organizations that are part of it. In the article entitled ‘Contagionʼ or How Disaster Movies “Educate” the Masses, weʼve seen how the WHO was involved in the promotion of mass vaccination campaigns following (bogus) disease scares, of civilian camps, of the bar-coding of individuals and so forth. More proof of the WHOʼs “elite bias” has been recently uncovered by a study: The organization has been taking hundreds of thousands of dollars from the worldʼs biggest pushers of unhealthy foods such as Coca-Cola, Nestlé and Unilever. It is relying on these companies for advice on how to fight obesity..é which is the equivalent of asking a drug dealer for advice on how stay off drugs and NOT buy his product. Coca-Cola, Nestlé and Unilever are not simply “food companies, they are gigantic conglomerates that produce and distribute an enormous proportion of processed foods across the world. In the article entitled Irrational Consumerism (or The Few Companies Who Feed the World), I described how only a few mega-conglomerates own most of the worldʼs brands of processed foods. To refresh your memory here are some of the brands -
On Coasean Bargaining with Transaction Costs: the Case of Vittel1
Working On Coasean Bargaining with Paper Transaction Costs: The Case of Vittel Christophe Déprés Gilles Grolleau 2005/3 Naoufel Mzoughi INRA-ENESAD UMR CESAER Centre d'Economie et Sociologie appliquées à l'Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux BP 87999 – 26, Bd Dr Petitjean – 21079 DIJON cedex On Coasean Bargaining with Transaction Costs: The Case of Vittel1 Christophe Déprés Université de Bourgogne - UMR INRA-ENESAD (CESAER) - MECF Cemagref Gilles Grolleau UMR INRA-ENESAD (CESAER) Naoufel Mzoughi (Corresponding author)2 Université de Bourgogne – UMR INRA-ENESAD (CESAER) Abstract: Based on an authentic case of contracting for environmental property rights, our paper shows several implications of applying the Coase propositions. The case study adds empirical content to basic transaction costs concepts by analyzing the design and implementation of a contractual arrangement between a pollutee –a bottler of mineral water Vittel– and several polluting farmers. We analyse the bargaining between land and water rights owners and the bottler Vittel to determine how they succeeded in contracting for environmental property rights. Valuation disputes, bi-lateral monopoly conditions, and third-party effects are key factors. Several implications for environmental rights negotiations are drawn. Key-Words: Transaction Costs, Environmental Property Rights, Vittel, Case Study, Contracting, Private arrangement, Environmental-related transactions. JEL classification: H23; K32; Q15; Q25. 1 The authors are particularly grateful to Gary Libecap for many helpful comments and suggestions. They also thank Marc Barbier, Eduardo Chia, Pierre Morlon, Freddy Huet and Katharine Farrell for their useful comments. Finally they thank the French Agency for the Environment and Energy Management (ADEME), the Regional Council of Burgundy (CRB), the Cemagref Clermont-Ferrand and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for financial support. -
All Bottled Up
ALL BOTTLED UP Nestlé’s Pursuit of Community Water About Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch is a nonprofit consumer organization that works to ensure clean water and safe food. We challenge the corporate control and abuse of our food and water resources by empowering people to take action and by transforming the public consciousness about what we eat and drink. Food & Water Watch works with grassroots organizations around the world to create an economically and environmentally viable future. Through research, public and policymaker educa- tion, media and lobbying, we advocate policies that guarantee safe, wholesome food produced in a humane and sustainable manner, and public, rather than private, control of water resources including oceans, rivers and groundwater. Food & Water Watch Main office: California Office: 1616 P St. NW, Suite 300 25 Stillman Street, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 San Francisco, CA 94107 tel: (202) 683-2500 tel: (415) 293-9900 fax: (202) 683-2501 fax: (415) 293-9908 [email protected] [email protected] www.foodandwaterwatch.org Copyright © January 2009 by Food & Water Watch. All rights reserved. This report can be viewed or downloaded at www.foodandwaterwatch.org. ALL BOTTLED UP Nestlé’s Pursuit of Community Water Table of Contents iv Executive Summary, Key Findings and Key Facts About Nestlé’s Bottled Water Business 1 History 2 Case Studies 2 California water in Nestlé’s sights 5 Florida fights back 5 Efforts in New England 6 Massachusetts 7 New Hampshire 7 Maine 11 Working against Nestlé in Wisconsin 12 Michigan water at stake 13 Other communities resist Nestlé 14 Conclusion 14 What you can do 15 Nestlé’s Buying Spree 16 Appendix 1: Nestlé Lashes Out Against Documentary Film FLOW 17 Appendix 2: The Bad News with Bottled Water 18 Appendix 3: Businesses Turn to Tap Water, Too 18 Appendix 4: Some Facts: Nestlé’s Bottled Water Business 19 Appendix 5: Possible Global Trade Implications of Groundwater Extraction 20 Endnotes Executive Summary Nestlé* takes water from U.S.