BRT Public Report Appendix

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BRT Public Report Appendix Integrating Livability Principles Into Transit Planning: An Assessment of Bus Rapid Transit Opportunities in Chicago August 2011 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: INDIVIDUAL LIVABILITY CRITERION SCORING APPENDIX B: HYPOTHETICAL STATIONS FOR DEMAND MODELING APPENDIX A: INDIVIDUAL LIVABILITY CRITERION SCORING CRITERION 1: CONNECTIVITY TO COMMUNITY SERVICES The results of the CONNECTIVITY TO COMMUNITY SERVICES criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest number of community services within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Connectivity to Community Services Scoring CRITERION 2: CONNECTIVITY TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS The results of the CONNECTIVITY TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest number of educational institutions within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Map of Connectivity to Educational Institutions Scoring CRITERION 3: CONNECTIVITY TO ENTERTAINMENT The results of the CONNECTIVITY TO ENTERTAINMENT criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest number of entertainment venues within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Map of Connectivity to Entertainment Scoring CRITERION 4: CONNECTIVITY TO FOOD STORES The results of the CONNECTIVITY TO FOOD STORES criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest number of food stores within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Map of Connectivity to Food Stores Scoring CRITERION 5: CONNECTIVITY TO MAJOR MEDICAL CARE The results of the CONNECTIVITY TO MAJOR MEDICAL CARE criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest number of major medical facilities within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Map of Connectivity to Major Medical Care Scoring CRITERION 6: CONNECTIVITY TO MAJOR OPEN SPACE The results of the CONNECTIVITY TO MAJOR OPEN SPACE criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest number of major open spaces within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Map of Connectivity to Major Open Space CRITERION 7: CONNECTIVITY TO RETAIL The results of the CONNECTIVITY TO RETAIL criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest number of retail stores within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Map of Connectivity to Retail Scoring CRITERION 8: EMPLOYMENT/JOB ACCESS The results of the EMPLOYMENT/JOB ACCESS criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest number of employees within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Map of Employment/Job Access Scoring CRITERION 9: EXISTING TRANSIT RIDERSHIP The results of the EXISTING TRANSIT RIDERSHIP criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest existing bus ridership flow within 0.25 miles received the highest scores. Map of Existing Transit Ridership Scoring CRITERION 10: EXISTING TRANSIT TRAVEL TIME The results of the EXISTING TRANSIT TRAVEL TIME criterion are shown below. Street segments with the slowest existing bus travel speed within 0.125 miles received the highest scores. Map of Existing Transit Travel Time Scoring CRITERION 11: INFILL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL The results of the INFILL DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL criterion are shown below. Street segments with the largest area of potential infill development within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Map of Infill Development Potential Scoring CRITERION 12: POPULATION The results of the POPULATION criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest population within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Map of Population Scoring CRITERION 13: POPULATION NOT WITHIN 0.5 MILES OF RAIL The results of the POPULATION NOT WITHIN 0.5 MILES OF RAIL criterion are shown below. Street segments with the highest Population not within 0.5 miles of Rail within 0.25 miles received the highest scores. Map of Population not within 0.5 miles of Rail Scoring CRITERION 14: TRANSPORTATION COSTS The results of the TRANSPORTATION COSTS criterion are found below. Street segments with the highest average transportation costs as a percentage of household income within 0.5 miles received the highest scores. Map of Transportation Costs Scoring APPENDIX B: HYPOTHETICAL STATIONS FOR DEMAND MODELING 95th There were 19 hypothetical stations on the potential 95th BRT route as shown in Figure 51 and Table 48. Figure 1: Map of Hypothetical Locations of BRT Stations on 95th Route Table 1: Hypothetical Locations of BRT Stations on 95th Route # Name Street Cross Street Distance to Next Eastbound Stop (miles) 1 Cicero W. 95th St. S. Cicero Ave. 0.5 2 Kostner W. 95th St. S. Kostner Ave. 0.5 3 Pulaski W. 95th St. S. Pulaski Rd. 0.5 4 Central Park W. 95th St. S. Central Park Ave. 0.5 5 Kedzie W. 95th St. S. Kedzie Ave. 0.5 6 California W. 95th St. S. California Ave. 0.5 7 Western W. 95th St. S. Western Ave. 0.5 8 Damen W. 95th St. S. Damen Ave. 0.25 9 95th Street Metra Rock W. 95th St. Metra Rock Island 0.25 Island Branch Station Branch Railroad Tracks 10 Ashland W. 95th St. S. Ashland Ave. 0.6 11 95th Street Longwood W. 95th St. S. Genoa Ave. 0.4 Metra Rock Island Main Station 12 Halsted W. 95th St. S. Halsted St. 0.5 13 Eggleston W. 95th St. S. Eggleston Ave. 0.5 14 95th Street CTA Red 95th St. I-94 0.5 Line Station 15 Chicago State E. 95th St. S. Martin Luther King 0.5 University Dr. 16 95th Street Metra E. 95th St. S. Cottage Grove Ave. 0.5 Electric Station 17 Woodlawn E. 95th St. S. Woodlawn Ave. 0.5 18 Stony Island E. 95th St. S. Stony Island Ave. 0.5 19 Jeffery E. 95th St. S. Jeffery Blvd. 0 Ashland There were 34 hypothetical stations on the potential Ashland BRT route as shown in Figure 52 and Table 49. Figure 2: Map of Hypothetical Locations of BRT Stations on Ashland Route Table 2: Hypothetical Locations of BRT Stations on Ashland Route # Name Street Cross Street Distance to Next Southbound Stop (miles) 1 Irving Park N. Ashland Ave. W. Irving Park Rd. 0.5 2 Addison N. Ashland Ave. W. Addison St. 0.25 3 Paulina CTA Brown N. Ashland Ave. W. Roscoe St. 0.25 Line Station 4 Belmont N. Ashland Ave. W. Belmont Ave. 0.5 5 Diversey N. Ashland Ave. W. Diversey Pkwy. 0.5 6 Fullerton N. Ashland Ave. W. Fullerton Ave. 0.6 7 Clybourn Metra Union N. Ashland Ave. W. Cortland St. 0.4 Pacific North Line and Northwest Line Station 8 North N. Ashland Ave. W. North Ave. 0.5 9 Division CTA Blue Line N. Ashland Ave. W. Division St. 0.5 Station 10 Chicago N. Ashland Ave. W. Chicago Ave. 0.35 11 Grand N. Ashland Ave. W. Grand Ave. 0.4 12 Ashland-Lake CTA N. Ashland Ave. CTA Green Line and 0.3 Green Line and Pink CTA Pink Line Tracks Line Station 13 Madison-United Ashland Ave. W. Madison St. 0.7 Center 14 Illinois Medical S. Ashland Ave. W. Polk St. 0.3 District-Polk CTA Pink Line Station 15 Roosevelt S. Ashland Ave. W. Roosevelt Rd. 0.6 16 18th Street CTA Pink S. Ashland Ave. W. 18th St. 0.4 Line Station 17 Cermak S. Ashland Ave. W. Cermak Rd. 0.9 18 Ashland-Orange CTA S. Ashland Ave. W. 31st Pl. 0.6 Orange Line Station # Name Street Cross Street Distance to Next Southbound Stop (miles) 19 35th S. Ashland Ave. W. 35th St. 0.5 20 Pershing S. Ashland Ave. W. Pershing Rd. 0.5 21 43rd S. Ashland Ave. W. 43rd St. 0.5 22 47th S. Ashland Ave. W. 47th St. 0.5 23 51st S. Ashland Ave. W. 51st St. 0.5 24 Garfield S. Ashland Ave. W. Garfield Blvd. 0.5 25 59th S. Ashland Ave. W. 59th St. 0.5 26 Ashland/63rd CTA S. Ashland Ave. W. 63rd St. 0.5 Green Line Station 27 Marquette S. Ashland Ave. W. Marquette Rd. 0.5 28 71st S. Ashland Ave. W. 71st St. 0.6 29 76th S. Ashland Ave. W. 76th St. 0.4 30 79th S. Ashland Ave. W. 79th St. 0.5 31 83rd S. Ashland Ave. W. 83rd St. 0.5 32 87th S. Ashland Ave. W. 87th St. 0.5 33 91st S. Ashland Ave. W. 91st St. 0.5 34 95th S. Ashland Ave. W. 95th St. 0 Cicero There were 17 hypothetical stations on the potential Cicero BRT route as shown in Figure 53 and Table 50. Figure 3: Map Hypothetical Locations of BRT Stations on Cicero Route Table 3: Hypothetical Locations of BRT Stations on Cicero Route # Name Street Cross Street Distance to Next Southbound Stop (miles) 1 Cicero-Cermak CTA S. Cicero Ave. 21st Pl. 0.5 Pink Line Station 2 Cicero Metra S. Cicero Ave. Burlington Northern 0.5 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Line Railroad Santa Fe Line Station Tracks 3 31st S. Cicero Ave. W. 31st St. 0.5 4 Hawthorne Race S. Cicero Ave. W. 35th St. 0.5 Course 5 Pershing S. Cicero Ave. W. Pershing Rd. 0.5 6 43rd S. Cicero Ave. W. 43rd St. 0.5 7 47th S. Cicero Ave. W. 47th St. 0.6 8 Archer S. Cicero Ave. S. Archer Ave. 0.7 9 Midway Airport- S. Cicero Ave. Midway Airport 0.7 Midway Orange Line Terminal Entrance Station 10 63rd S. Cicero Ave. W. 63rd St. 0.5 11 67th S. Cicero Ave. 67th St. 0.75 12 73rd S. Cicero Ave. W. 73rd St. 0.75 13 79th S. Cicero Ave. W. 79th St. 0.5 14 83rd S. Cicero Ave. W. 83rd St. 0.5 15 87th S. Cicero Ave. W. 87th St. 0.5 16 91st S. Cicero Ave. 91st St. 0.5 17 95th S. Cicero Ave. W. 95th St. 0 Fullerton/Grand There were 14 hypothetical stations on the potential Fullerton/Grand BRT route as shown in Figure 54 and Table 51.
Recommended publications
  • Project Scope Why Is This Work Necessary? How Will This Benefit Red Line Riders?
    Red Line South Track Renewal project Cermak-Chinatown to 95th Street Spring/Summer 2013 CTA is planning to rebuild the South Red Line from just north of Cermak-Chinatown to 95th Street. The work will benefit Red Line riders for decades to come—through faster travel times, increased reliability, and spruced-up stations with a variety of improvements. As part of the project, in Spring/Summer 2013 the Red Line will be completely closed from Roosevelt Road to 95th Street for five months. CTA will offer several alternative travel options during this closure to minimize the impact on customers as much as possible (see other side of this page). Cermak- Faster travel times Better reliability Improved stations Chinatown Project scope CTA will replace all of the ties, rails, third rails, drainage system and ballast (the stone material that holds the ties in place) in the Red Line right of way. Additionally, all nine stations along the Dan Ryan Branch will be improved, from basic enhancements like new paint and better lighting Sox-35th to additional customer amenities, like new benches and bike racks. New elevators will be installed at the Garfield, 63rd and 87th Street stations—making the entire South Red Line fully accessible. 47th Garfield Why is this work necessary? The Dan Ryan Branch was built in 1969, when Richard Nixon was in the White House, a gallon 63rd of gas cost 35 cents and Gale Sayers won the NFL rush- ing title. The original tracks are well beyond their expected Dan Ryan terminal dedication 1969 lifespan, and call for a complete replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Plan Cook County
    HIGHWAY PLAN FOR COOK COUNTY t e;: ,,., ~e.=, ~:: T ' <. J T - ._ ,... ' I: - I :: • k.. -:. - - <" ,. ' I \.. ' ,_, ~ J (.1~· ,, J) l' \.,i DETAILED STUDY OF H ·I G H W AV PL A N FOR COOK COUNTY PREPARED FOR THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF COOK BY THE COOK COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT GEORGE A. QUINLAN SUPERINTENDENT OF COUNTY HIGHWAYS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST, 1940 A STUDY OF THE SUPERHIGHWAY FINANCING BY COOK COUNTY ON A PAY AS YOU GO PLAN l l \ [ 3 ] The undertaking of the construction of that portion of the Superhighway System within the""Central Business District of Chicago by Cook County on a pay as you go basis would require the allocation of approximately 43% of its anticipated highway funds for the next 20 years. The construction of the several units of the system by the County would require a programming of the work in a manner similar to the following: Estimated Cost Unit in Millions Year No. Improvement of Dollars 1941 1 Tunnel Connection with Outer Drive-(Drive shore protection and place fill) . 5 1942 1 Tunnel Connection with Outer Drive-(Con- struct tunnels, pavements and landscaping) 3. 0 1943 2 Elm and Cedar Street tunnels-(Buy Right of Way) .8 1944 2 Elm and Cedar Street tunnels-(Construct Elm Street tuni;iel) 2. 9 1945 2 Elm and Cedar Street Tunnels-(Construct Cedar Street tunnel) 3 .0 1946 3 Northwest Superhighway-Sheffield to Division (Buy Right of Way and construct) 3.9 1947 4 Northwest Superhighway-Division to Chicago -(Buy Right of Way and construct) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Affordable Housing
    Our Mission Catholic Charities fulfills the Church’s role in the mission of charity to anyone in need by providing compassionate, competent and professional services that strengthen and support individuals, families and communities based on the value and dignity of human life. Some Catholic Charities services benefit from United Way funding. © 2013 Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago Catholic Charities: All about help and just about everywhere. Catholic Charities began in 1917, when During the “War on Poverty” years A Mission Rooted in Catholic a group of Catholic businessmen of the 1960s, the agency began to Social Teaching: We Serve Everyone petitioned Cardinal Mundelein provide Head Start services. In the Regardless of Faith. to create a central Catholic charity 1980s Catholic Charities became one Catholic Charities fulfills the Church’s in Chicago to relieve the burden of the largest providers of foster care role in the mission of charity to anyone on Catholic parishes, which were and other child welfare services in the in need by providing compassionate, struggling to meet the needs of the area. competent and professional services poor in their communities. World War that strengthen and support I had just ended, the Spanish Influenza Through the 1990s and into the individuals, families and communities Epidemic was sweeping the globe, 21st century, the agency grew its based on the value and dignity of and immigrants were arriving daily in programming for seniors, and built human life. In order to remain faithful a city growing by leaps and bounds. many affordable residences for this to our mission, Catholic Charities is The organization was chartered in population.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comment Summary Report
    City of Chicago DRAFT Equitable Transit- Oriented Development (eTOD) Policy Plan Public Comment Summary Report 1 Contents Summary of Public Comments & Outreach Efforts ...................................................................................... 3 Themes from Public Comments .................................................................................................................... 4 Themes from Community Conversations ..................................................................................................... 5 Individual Comments .................................................................................................................................... 5 See Appendix for Attached Letters submmitted as public comment 2 Summary of Public Comments & Outreach Efforts The following document summarizes the public comments on the City of Chicago’s proposed ETOD Policy Plan, received between September 14 and October 29, 2020. Overview of comments submitted through email: 59 total public comments 24 comments from organizations 35 comments from individuals Local Groups Developers Transportation Environmental Chicago Metropolitan 3e. Studio LLC Metra Environmental Law & Policy Agency for Planning Center Esperanza Health Centers The Community Builders Pace Bus Illinois Environmental Council Metropolitan Planning Hispanic Housing RTA Sustainable Englewood Council Development Coordination Initiatives Red Line Extension Coalition Urban Land Institute Zipcar Elevate Energy Roseland Heights Share Mobility Community
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Display Boards for Public Meetings on the Ashland Avenue Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project, Held December 10 and 11, 2013
    Meeting Display Boards for Public Meetings on the Ashland Avenue Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project, held December 10 and 11, 2013. Logos: CTA in partnership with Chicago Department of Transportation and Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development Welcome: Welcome to the public open house for the Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Environmental Assessment and project. • In April 2013, CTA and CDOT announced a vision for a center running Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system on Ashland Avenue between Irving Park Road and 95th Street to provide a fast and reliable north/ south transit connection for 16 miles through Chicago. The vision reflects the planning process and community engagement undertaken in 2012. • Over the summer, CTA and CDOT heard from various key stakeholders about this plan. We are now holding two public open house meetings as an extension of this outreach to gather additional input from the public. CTA and CDOT are still developing the Ashland BRT design, and we are considering options and modifications, including the implementation of additional left turns, based on continued feedback from the public. • The public open house meetings will summarize studies of the project impacts, including traffic analyses, that have been performed as part of the formal Environmental Assessment for the project, in accordance with federal government requirements. The Environmental Assessment is now complete and available on CTA’s website and in hard copy at several community locations. CTA and CDOT would like your comments on the Environmental Assessment, which can be made at the public open houses or by e-mail at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Illinoistollwaymap-June2005.Pdf
    B C D E F G H I J K L Issued 2005 INDEX LEE ST. 12 45 31 Racine DESPLAINES RIVER RD. Janesville 43 75 Sturtevant 294 Addison . .J-6 Grayslake . .I-3 Palos Hills . .J-8 Union Grove Devon Ave 11 Burlington 90 Plaza Alden . .G-2 Gurnee . .J-3 Palos Park . .J-8 Footville Elmwood Park 11 Algonquin . .H-4 Hammond . .L-8 Park City . .J-3 Elkhorn 11 Alsip . .K-8 Hanover Park . .I-6 Park Forest . .K-9 NORTHWEST 51 11 72 Amboy . .C-7 Harmon . .B-7 Park Ridge . .K-5 14 11 TOLLWAY Antioch . .I-2 Harvey . .K-8 Paw Paw . .E-8 94 142 32 1 Arlington . .C-9 Harwood Heights . .K-6 Phoenix . .L-8 39 11 Delavan 36 HIGGINS RD. 1 Arlington Heights . .J-5 Hawthorn Woods . .I-4 Pingree Grove . .H-5 90 41 31 TRI-STATE TOLLWAY Ashton . .C-6 Hebron . .H-2 Plainfield . .H-8 83 67 142 Aurora . .H-7 Hickory Hills . .K-7 Pleasant Prairie . .J-2 50 O’Hare East Barrington . .I-5 Highland . .L-9 Poplar Grove . .E-3 Plaza 72 Bartlett . .I-6 Highland Park . .K-4 Posen . .K-8 Darien 75 45 90 Batavia . .H-6 Hillcrest . .D-6 Prospect Heights . .J-5 Beach Park . .K-3 Hillside . .J-6 Richton Park . .K-9 50 158 River Rd. Bedford Park . .K-7 Hinkley . .F-7 Racine . .K-1 50 Plaza Paddock Lake Bellwood . .J-6 Hinsdale . .J-7 Richmond . .H-2 213 Lake Geneva O’Hare West KENNEDY EXPY. 43 14 Williams Bay Kenosha Plaza Beloit .
    [Show full text]
  • 95Th Street Project Definition
    Project Definition TECHNICAL MEMORANUM th 95 Street Line May 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...............................................................................................ES-1 Defining the Project......................................................................................ES-2 Project Features and Characteristics ..........................................................ES-3 Next Steps .....................................................................................................ES-7 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................1 1.1 Defining the Project ...............................................................................2 1.2 95th Street Line Project Goals.................................................................2 1.3 Organization of this Plan Document.....................................................3 2 Corridor Context ..................................................................................................6 2.1 Corridor Route Description ....................................................................6 2.2 Land Use Character ..............................................................................6 2.3 Existing & Planned Transit Service .........................................................8 2.4 Local and Regional Plans......................................................................8 2.5 Historical Resources ...............................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Department of Public Health Division of Health Care Facilities and Programs Health Facilities Directory Home Health Agency
    Illinois Department of Public Health Division of Health Care Facilities and Programs Health Facilities Directory Home Health Agency Facility Name Facility Address City County Zip Contact Person Phone # License # 1st Assist Home Healthcare, LLC 1019 W. Wise Rd., Ste. 200 Schaumburg Cook 60193 Pamela Canete (630) 339-3688 1010496 1st Choice Home Health Agency, Inc 7254 W. Benton Drive Frankfort Will 60423 Edward Assam (815) 464-9980 1011184 1st Family Home Healthcare, Inc. 666 Russell Court, Ste 308 Woodstock Mc Henry 60098 Ramon Sagrado (815) 337-4240 1011088 1st Home Healthcare, Inc. 5875 N. Lincoln Ave., Ste 229 Chicago Cook 60659 Joseph D. de la Cruz (773) 275-7935 1010441 24/Seven Health Care Services, Inc. 3318 W. Peterson Ave. Chicago Cook 60659 Lourdes Redoble (773) 463-3755 1011165 3 Angels Home Health 8700 N. Waukegan Rd., Ste 224 Morton Grove Cook 60053 Farhan Siddiqui (847) 581-1400 1010960 4 Seasons Home Healthcare Services Corporation 2015 S. Arlington Hghts Rd, Ste 102 Arlington Heights Cook 60005 Alberto V. Jovellanos (847) 357-8008 1011478 5 Star Healthcare, Inc. 1974 Miner Street, 1st Floor Des Plaines Cook 60016 Vincente Cabrera (847) 257-0130 1010292 A & S Home Healthcare, Inc. 6900 Main Street, Ste. 200 Downers Grove Du Page 60516 Sultan Surti (630) 964-6100 1010705 A & Z Home Health Care, Inc. 3232 Ridge Road, Ste. 1 Lansing Cook 60438 Patricia Omorogbe (708) 418-1608 1010566 A Plus Home Health Care Corporation 7906 South Crandon Avenue, #7 Chicago Cook 60616 Anman Ubir (773) 793-4527 1010978 A Touch From Above, Corp. 3729 Chicago Road Steger Will 60475 Ellen Cajayon-Tucker (708) 833-8643 1010893 A2Z Healthcare Services, LLC 15347 70th Court Orland Park Cook 60462 LaShonda Crockett (708) 332-9070 1011069 Aaron Nursing Services, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Heights/ 95Th Street July 2016 Planning Priorities Report Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction
    Washington Heights/ 95th Street July 2016 Planning Priorities Report Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 Planning Priorities Report ........................................................................................................................ 3 The planning process ............................................................................................................................ 3 Section 2: Regional Context .................................................................................................................... 5 Regional Setting.......................................................................................................................................... 5 History of Washington Heights ............................................................................................................... 7 Washington Heights/95th Street and GO TO 2040 ............................................................................... 11 Section 3: Capacity Building and Community Engagement ........................................................... 12 Community engagement activities ........................................................................................................ 12 Key themes ................................................................................................................................................ 13 Strengths ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Region Congestion Management Highway Network
    Chicago Region Congestion Management Highway Network 7 4 I 3 S L L 8 7 I R 1 3 L I A 1 3 1 I 3 L L 17 I 3 0 7 S IL 173 U R S A 1 1 IL 173 2 IL 173 0 4 U 173 SRA 307 S S IL R A IL 173 07 4 I 3 A 1 R L S 5 0 1 4 1 S 0 4 1 3 2 9 R 1 U S 5 A ( A S L G U I R 2 4 R S 1 7 5 3 US 12 2 S E 1 R E L I N A S I B L 6 R 0 8 A A 3 2 Y 4 0 R 8 O IL 132 Yorkhouse Road A D ) Yorkhouse Rd 73 1 L I I L 1 3 2 GOLF (G R SUNSET AVE IL S 3 R AN S 1 A GREENWOOD R D SRA 602 A 4 AV E) EN U 10 08 4 1 2 L I IL 8 3 Grand Ave S ) H D Clark/Division E A CHARLES RD R O IL 120 I S t D R R 0 SRA 508 e A 1 A e D N r 2 t N 0 SRA 508 0 6 2 R 2 L 1 A I 0 S A 1 2 O R R L e I A l S ( 8 0 0 l 6 12 RA 5 I IL S D 2 a US 0 L 14 7 12 0 1 3 4 S S Lake St S a SRA 2 A Chicago/State 00 L R A 5 U go Ave I Chica L 5 4 R 0 I 8 S L S Grayslake 1 20 U McHenry County Lake County Ontario St Ontario / Ohio Corridor Ohio St Illinois / Grand Corridor L EY RO Grand Ave CK A D) 3 BU 90 Illinois St 2 PETERSON ROAD ( I L 13 7 ¨§ L ¦ I SRA 211 Grand/State SRA 211 Ogilvie U U S Washington/Dearborn 14 S I L S 6 Libertyville 4 r 0 R 1 t o S State/Lake A ( d Clark/Lake i S k r r e 9 K Washington/State 2 a r W l 0 0 u 3 O o C Millennium Station 4 9 a n 2 K t C c n St e hingto 7 Was 4 A S ´ L I 1 I 4 k v s E e R 0 3 t e L t e A I ison St ad a I S M 1 H L t r S L n e i S n I 2 I s D v A 1 G i a e a Downtown Routes t l r R n r H i g S i i S P a v D l W n ms St SRA Route #'s Ada IL 176 h e P o s 6 s 7 c 1 s downtown are 411 I A s L i I r L e u IL 176 e e Jackson Blvd Y 6 f unless otherwise noted f M D D SRA 509 b 1 0 0 ) e 6 / A / J m US 20 SR 8 3 n ay u SRA 601 IL 176 Congress Parkw l o 290 o s r ¦¨§ C IL 60 (TOWNLINE ROAD) IL 60 e f 0 0.5 Crystal Lake f LaSalle St.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDINANCE NO. 97-88 an ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING IMPLEMENTATION of SERVICE CHANGES WHEREAS, Chicago and the Region Have Changed Sinc
    ORDINANCE NO. 97-88 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING IMPLEMENTATION OF SERVICE CHANGES WHEREAS, Chicago and the region have changed since the Chicago Transit Authority was created in 1945, including population and- employment shifts; and, WHEREAS, the way people use public transportation has changed, resulting in an overall decline in use of public transportation; and, WHEREAS, the Authority's public funding has not kept up with inflation; and, WHEREAS, in order for the Authority to serve the region's public transportation needs, it must restructure the way it provides service; and, WHEREAS, the Board retained the services of the con­ sulting firm of Booze, Allen & Hamilton to analyze the demand for service and the costs of providing service; and, WHEREAS, restructuring service will make the Authority's existing service plan more efficient, create a stronger system which is necessary for long-term survival and be in the best interests of the Authority's ridership; and, WHEREAS, services should better match demand and continue to ensure that all neighborhoods have access to public transportation to the maximum extent practicable; and, WHEREAS, experimenting with new types of services is desirable; and, WHEREAS, after public notice the Chicago Transit Board held a public hearing on June 30, 1997 where it heard testimony from 145 people; and, WHEREAS, the Chicago Transit Board has received 775 written comments on the proposed service changes; and, WHEREAS, the Chicago Transit Board has considered the written submissions, the testimony at the hearing and has reviewed the proposed service changes; and, WHEREAS, the Chicago Transit Board has amended the proposed changes as set forth in "Exhibit A" attached to and made a part of this ordinance.
    [Show full text]
  • First Bus All Aboard! Rail System Map Detailed Fare in for Ma Tion Service
    All aboard! Detailed fare in for ma tion First bus / last bus times This map gives detailed information about Chica go Transit Base/regular fares All CTA and Pace buses are accessible to people with disabilities. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUN./HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUN./HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUN./HOL. Authority bus and el e vat ed/sub way train ser vice, and shows Full Reduced Student Reduced fare program X Pay-per-ride fares, as deducted from value in a Ventra Transit Account Use this chart to determine days, hours of service, where each Pace subur ban bus and Metra commut er train routes in the The following groups are eligible to pay a reduced fare on CTA: CTA ser vice area. It is up dat ed regularly, and avail able at ‘L’ train fare $2.50* $1.25 75¢ route begins and ends, and first and last buses in each direction Wallace/Racine West Lawrence Inner Drive/Michigan Express 44 Racine/87th north to Halsted (Orange) 4:30a-9:40p 8:00a-6:00p 9:00a-6:00p 81W Cumberland (Blue) east to Jeff Park (Blue) 5:25a-10:25p 5:20a-10:20p 8:45a-10:15p 14 6 Berwyn (Red) south to Museum Campus 5:55a-10:40p 6:00a-10:40p 6:00a-10:40p † on each route. X X X CTA rail stations, Metra down town terminals, visitor cen ters, Bus fare $2.25 $1.10 75¢ Children 7 through 11 Halsted (Orange) south to Racine/87th 5:15a-10:25p 8:50a-6:45p 9:45a-6:45p Museum Campus north to Berwyn (Red) 7:00a-11:35p 6:50a-11:40p 6:50a-11:35p X Jeff Park X (Blue) west to Cumberland X (Blue) 4:55a-9:55p 4:50a-9:50p 8:20a-9:50p air ports, or by calling the RTA.
    [Show full text]