DOCSLIB.ORG

R Bus Apid Transit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Irving Park Addison Roscoe Belmont in partnership with Diversey Fullerton Cortland North Division Environmental Chicago Assessment Grand Lake Madison Jackson Harrison Polk Bus Roosevelt 18th Blue Island Rapid 31st Ashland Transit 35th November 2013 Pershing 43rd 47th 51st Garfield 59th 63rd 69th 74th Prepared for: The Federal Transit Administration 79th 83rd 87th 91st 95th Prepared by Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project Environmental Assessment November 14, 2013 Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project Environmental Assessment Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................ES-1 Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................... ES-1 Environmental Resources, Impacts and Mitigation ..................................................... ES-2 Opportunity for Public Comment ................................................................................. ES-5 1. PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Background ............................................................................................... 2 1.3 Needs to be Addressed ......................................................................................... 4 1.4 Project Purpose ..................................................................................................... 5 2. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ............................................................................................... 9 2.1 Alternatives Development Process........................................................................ 9 2.2 No-Build Alternative ............................................................................................. 11 2.3 Build Alternative .................................................................................................. 13 3. TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS AND ANALYSIS ........................................................... 19 3.1 Traffic Analysis .................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Traffic Mitigation .................................................................................................. 35 3.3 Parking Impact Analysis ...................................................................................... 47 3.4 Transit Operational Analysis ............................................................................... 50 4. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ....................... 55 4.1 Displacements and Relocation of Existing Uses ................................................. 55 4.2 Land Use and Economic Development ............................................................... 55 4.3 Neighborhoods and Communities ....................................................................... 59 4.4 Historical and Archaeological Resources ............................................................ 64 4.5 Parklands and Recreational Resources .............................................................. 67 4.6 Visual Quality ...................................................................................................... 70 4.7 Noise and Vibration ............................................................................................. 72 4.8 Air Quality ............................................................................................................ 74 4.9 Water Resources ................................................................................................. 77 4.10 Biological Resources ........................................................................................... 79 4.11 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................... 81 Page i Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project Environmental Assessment 4.12 Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................... 82 4.13 Energy ................................................................................................................. 83 4.14 Safety and Security ............................................................................................. 84 4.15 Environmental Justice Communities ................................................................... 85 4.16 Temporary Construction Impacts ........................................................................ 88 4.17 Indirect Effects and Cumulative Impacts ............................................................. 90 5. AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ................................................. 93 5.1 Agency Coordination ........................................................................................... 93 5.2 Public Involvement Plan ...................................................................................... 93 5.3 EA Distribution and Public Comment Period ....................................................... 95 6. REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 97 List of Figures Figure 1-1: Study Area Overview Map .......................................................................................... 6 Figure 2-1: No-Build Alternative .................................................................................................. 12 Figure 2-2: Build Alternative (Preferred Alternative) ................................................................... 14 Figure 2-3: Ashland Avenue BRT Project Phasing Limits ........................................................... 16 Figure 3-1: Right-of-Way and Street Width Extents .................................................................... 20 Figure 3-2: Typical Existing Ashland Avenue Roadway Configuration ....................................... 21 Figure 3-3: Typical Proposed Ashland Avenue Roadway Configuration .................................... 21 Figure 3-4: Diversion Analysis Study Area ................................................................................. 25 Figure 3-5: Existing and Build Conditions AM Peak Hour Level of Service (1 of 2) .................... 31 Figure 3-6: Existing and Build Conditions AM Peak Hour Level of Service (2 of 2) .................... 32 Figure 3-7: Existing and Build Conditions PM Peak Hour Level of Service (1 of 2) .................... 33 Figure 3-8: Existing and Build Conditions PM Peak Hour Level of Service (2 of 2) .................... 34 Figure 3-9: Existing and Mitigated (inside curb-to-curb) Build Conditions AM Peak Hour Level of Service (1 of 2) ...................................................................................................... 39 Figure 3-10: Existing and Mitigated (inside curb-to-curb) Build Conditions AM Peak Hour Level of Service (2 of 2) ................................................................................................. 40 Figure 3-11: Existing and Mitigated (inside curb-to-curb) Build Conditions PM Peak Hour Level of Service (1 of 2) .................................................................................................. 41 Figure 3-12: Existing and Mitigated (inside curb-to-curb) Build Conditions PM Peak Hour Level of Service (2 of 2) .................................................................................................. 42 Figure 4-1: Existing Land Use (1 of 2) ........................................................................................ 56 Figure 4-2: Existing Land Use (2 of 2) ........................................................................................ 57 Figure 4-3: Intersecting Neighborhoods (1 of 2) ......................................................................... 61 Figure 4-4: Intersecting Neighborhoods (2 of 2) ......................................................................... 62 Page ii Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project Environmental Assessment Figure 4-5: Parklands (1 of 2) ..................................................................................................... 68 Figure 4-6: Parklands (2 of 2) ..................................................................................................... 69 Figure 4-7: Current Visual Conditions at Select Intersections along Ashland Avenue................ 71 Figure 4-8: Build Alternative Station and Alignment Concepts ................................................... 71 List of Tables Table ES-1: Summary of Impacts ........................................................................................... ES-2 Table 2-1: No-Build Alternative Transit Operational Service Characteristics .............................. 12 Table 2-2: Phase 1 Implementation Schedule (Cortland Street to 31st Street) ........................... 15 Table 2-3: Phase 2 Implementation Schedule (31st Street to 95th Street and Cortland Street to Irving Park Road) ................................................................................................... 15 Table 3-1: Existing Ashland Avenue Right-of-Way and Curb-to-Curb Widths ............................ 21 Table 3-2: Percent Change between Existing Conditions and Build Conditions by Routes ....... 27 Table 3-3: Percent Change
Recommended publications
  • Project Scope Why Is This Work Necessary? How Will This Benefit Red Line Riders?

    Project Scope Why Is This Work Necessary? How Will This Benefit Red Line Riders?

    Red Line South Track Renewal project Cermak-Chinatown to 95th Street Spring/Summer 2013 CTA is planning to rebuild the South Red Line from just north of Cermak-Chinatown to 95th Street. The work will benefit Red Line riders for decades to come—through faster travel times, increased reliability, and spruced-up stations with a variety of improvements. As part of the project, in Spring/Summer 2013 the Red Line will be completely closed from Roosevelt Road to 95th Street for five months. CTA will offer several alternative travel options during this closure to minimize the impact on customers as much as possible (see other side of this page). Cermak- Faster travel times Better reliability Improved stations Chinatown Project scope CTA will replace all of the ties, rails, third rails, drainage system and ballast (the stone material that holds the ties in place) in the Red Line right of way. Additionally, all nine stations along the Dan Ryan Branch will be improved, from basic enhancements like new paint and better lighting Sox-35th to additional customer amenities, like new benches and bike racks. New elevators will be installed at the Garfield, 63rd and 87th Street stations—making the entire South Red Line fully accessible. 47th Garfield Why is this work necessary? The Dan Ryan Branch was built in 1969, when Richard Nixon was in the White House, a gallon 63rd of gas cost 35 cents and Gale Sayers won the NFL rush- ing title. The original tracks are well beyond their expected Dan Ryan terminal dedication 1969 lifespan, and call for a complete replacement.
  • Planners Guide to Chicago 2013

    Planners Guide to Chicago 2013

    Planners Guide to Chicago 2013 2013 Lake Baha’i Glenview 41 Wilmette Temple Central Old 14 45 Orchard Northwestern 294 Waukegan Golf Univ 58 Milwaukee Sheridan Golf Morton Mill Grove 32 C O N T E N T S Dempster Skokie Dempster Evanston Des Main 2 Getting Around Plaines Asbury Skokie Oakton Northwest Hwy 4 Near the Hotels 94 90 Ridge Crawford 6 Loop Walking Tour Allstate McCormick Touhy Arena Lincolnwood 41 Town Center Pratt Park Lincoln 14 Chinatown Ridge Loyola Devon Univ 16 Hyde Park Peterson 14 20 Lincoln Square Bryn Mawr Northeastern O’Hare 171 Illinois Univ Clark 22 Old Town International Foster 32 Airport North Park Univ Harwood Lawrence 32 Ashland 24 Pilsen Heights 20 32 41 Norridge Montrose 26 Printers Row Irving Park Bensenville 32 Lake Shore Dr 28 UIC and Taylor St Addison Western Forest Preserve 32 Wrigley Field 30 Wicker Park–Bucktown Cumberland Harlem Narragansett Central Cicero Oak Park Austin Laramie Belmont Elston Clybourn Grand 43 Broadway Diversey Pulaski 32 Other Places to Explore Franklin Grand Fullerton 3032 DePaul Park Milwaukee Univ Lincoln 36 Chicago Planning Armitage Park Zoo Timeline Kedzie 32 North 64 California 22 Maywood Grand 44 Conference Sponsors Lake 50 30 Park Division 3032 Water Elmhurst Halsted Tower Oak Chicago Damen Place 32 Park Navy Butterfield Lake 4 Pier 1st Madison United Center 6 290 56 Illinois 26 Roosevelt Medical Hines VA District 28 Soldier Medical Ogden Field Center Cicero 32 Cermak 24 Michigan McCormick 88 14 Berwyn Place 45 31st Central Park 32 Riverside Illinois Brookfield Archer 35th
  • Highway Plan Cook County

    Highway Plan Cook County

    HIGHWAY PLAN FOR COOK COUNTY t e;: ,,., ~e.=, ~:: T ' <. J T - ._ ,... ' I: - I :: • k.. -:. - - <" ,. ' I \.. ' ,_, ~ J (.1~· ,, J) l' \.,i DETAILED STUDY OF H ·I G H W AV PL A N FOR COOK COUNTY PREPARED FOR THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF COOK BY THE COOK COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT GEORGE A. QUINLAN SUPERINTENDENT OF COUNTY HIGHWAYS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST, 1940 A STUDY OF THE SUPERHIGHWAY FINANCING BY COOK COUNTY ON A PAY AS YOU GO PLAN l l \ [ 3 ] The undertaking of the construction of that portion of the Superhighway System within the""Central Business District of Chicago by Cook County on a pay as you go basis would require the allocation of approximately 43% of its anticipated highway funds for the next 20 years. The construction of the several units of the system by the County would require a programming of the work in a manner similar to the following: Estimated Cost Unit in Millions Year No. Improvement of Dollars 1941 1 Tunnel Connection with Outer Drive-(Drive shore protection and place fill) . 5 1942 1 Tunnel Connection with Outer Drive-(Con- struct tunnels, pavements and landscaping) 3. 0 1943 2 Elm and Cedar Street tunnels-(Buy Right of Way) .8 1944 2 Elm and Cedar Street tunnels-(Construct Elm Street tuni;iel) 2. 9 1945 2 Elm and Cedar Street Tunnels-(Construct Cedar Street tunnel) 3 .0 1946 3 Northwest Superhighway-Sheffield to Division (Buy Right of Way and construct) 3.9 1947 4 Northwest Superhighway-Division to Chicago -(Buy Right of Way and construct) 1.
  • Senior Affordable Housing

    Senior Affordable Housing

    Our Mission Catholic Charities fulfills the Church’s role in the mission of charity to anyone in need by providing compassionate, competent and professional services that strengthen and support individuals, families and communities based on the value and dignity of human life. Some Catholic Charities services benefit from United Way funding. © 2013 Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago Catholic Charities: All about help and just about everywhere. Catholic Charities began in 1917, when During the “War on Poverty” years A Mission Rooted in Catholic a group of Catholic businessmen of the 1960s, the agency began to Social Teaching: We Serve Everyone petitioned Cardinal Mundelein provide Head Start services. In the Regardless of Faith. to create a central Catholic charity 1980s Catholic Charities became one Catholic Charities fulfills the Church’s in Chicago to relieve the burden of the largest providers of foster care role in the mission of charity to anyone on Catholic parishes, which were and other child welfare services in the in need by providing compassionate, struggling to meet the needs of the area. competent and professional services poor in their communities. World War that strengthen and support I had just ended, the Spanish Influenza Through the 1990s and into the individuals, families and communities Epidemic was sweeping the globe, 21st century, the agency grew its based on the value and dignity of and immigrants were arriving daily in programming for seniors, and built human life. In order to remain faithful a city growing by leaps and bounds. many affordable residences for this to our mission, Catholic Charities is The organization was chartered in population.
  • Public Comment Summary Report

    Public Comment Summary Report

    City of Chicago DRAFT Equitable Transit- Oriented Development (eTOD) Policy Plan Public Comment Summary Report 1 Contents Summary of Public Comments & Outreach Efforts ...................................................................................... 3 Themes from Public Comments .................................................................................................................... 4 Themes from Community Conversations ..................................................................................................... 5 Individual Comments .................................................................................................................................... 5 See Appendix for Attached Letters submmitted as public comment 2 Summary of Public Comments & Outreach Efforts The following document summarizes the public comments on the City of Chicago’s proposed ETOD Policy Plan, received between September 14 and October 29, 2020. Overview of comments submitted through email: 59 total public comments 24 comments from organizations 35 comments from individuals Local Groups Developers Transportation Environmental Chicago Metropolitan 3e. Studio LLC Metra Environmental Law & Policy Agency for Planning Center Esperanza Health Centers The Community Builders Pace Bus Illinois Environmental Council Metropolitan Planning Hispanic Housing RTA Sustainable Englewood Council Development Coordination Initiatives Red Line Extension Coalition Urban Land Institute Zipcar Elevate Energy Roseland Heights Share Mobility Community
  • Meeting Display Boards for Public Meetings on the Ashland Avenue Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project, Held December 10 and 11, 2013

    Meeting Display Boards for Public Meetings on the Ashland Avenue Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project, Held December 10 and 11, 2013

    Meeting Display Boards for Public Meetings on the Ashland Avenue Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Project, held December 10 and 11, 2013. Logos: CTA in partnership with Chicago Department of Transportation and Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development Welcome: Welcome to the public open house for the Ashland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Environmental Assessment and project. • In April 2013, CTA and CDOT announced a vision for a center running Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system on Ashland Avenue between Irving Park Road and 95th Street to provide a fast and reliable north/ south transit connection for 16 miles through Chicago. The vision reflects the planning process and community engagement undertaken in 2012. • Over the summer, CTA and CDOT heard from various key stakeholders about this plan. We are now holding two public open house meetings as an extension of this outreach to gather additional input from the public. CTA and CDOT are still developing the Ashland BRT design, and we are considering options and modifications, including the implementation of additional left turns, based on continued feedback from the public. • The public open house meetings will summarize studies of the project impacts, including traffic analyses, that have been performed as part of the formal Environmental Assessment for the project, in accordance with federal government requirements. The Environmental Assessment is now complete and available on CTA’s website and in hard copy at several community locations. CTA and CDOT would like your comments on the Environmental Assessment, which can be made at the public open houses or by e-mail at [email protected].
  • Southeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis Locally Preferred Alternative Report

    Southeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis Locally Preferred Alternative Report

    SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DOCUMENT #9 LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT PREPARED BY AUGUST 2011 METRA – SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DOCUMENTS 1. Detailed Work Scope 2. Purpose & Need 3. Initial Alternatives, Part I: Modes & Technologies 4. Evaluation Methodology 5. Initial Alternatives, Part I Screening and Part II: Conceptual Design 6. Screening of Initial Alternatives, Part II 7. Feasible Alternatives 8. Screening of Feasible Alternatives 9. Locally Preferred Alternative Report AECOM AUGUST 2011 I METRA – SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE.................................................................................................................. 1 B. BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 1 II. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS.............................................................. 5 A. INITIAL SCREENING, PART I................................................................................... 5 B. DEFINITION AND SCREENING OF INITIAL ALTERNATIVES, PART II.................. 7 C. DEFINITION OF FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES ........................................................ 10 D. DETAILED FINAL SCREENING.............................................................................. 11 III. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY.......................................................................
  • Chicago - Urban New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 1Q20

    Chicago - Urban New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 1Q20

    Chicago - Urban New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 1Q20 ID PROPERTY UNITS 7 Edge on Broadway 105 7 8 Eagles Building Redevelopment 134 131 14 Four50 Residences 80 57 22 Lathrop Homes Redevelopment 414 Total Lease Up 733 111 35 1900 West Lawrence Avenue 59 45 Dakin Street & Sheridan Road 54 110 Foster Beach Total Under Construction 113 56 54 1801 West Grace Street 62 132 55 1825 West Lawrence Avenue 166 56 5356 North Sheridan Road 50 113 57 Loft Lago 59 58 Wilson Red Line Development 110 35 137 55 59 Lake Shore Drive 332 Mixed-Use Development 112 58 Montrose Beach 60 Panorama 140 134 61 Clark and Drummond 84 133 62 Edith Spurlock 485 Redevelopment-Lincoln Park 136 109 Lathrop Chicago Redevelopment Phase II 702 110 5440 North Sheridan Road 78 111 Edgewater Medical Center Redevelopment 141 135 45 112 4601 North Broadway 197 114 8 113 Draper Phase II, The 368 54 114 3921 North Sheridan 120 59 Total Planned 3,094 141 131 Loft Lago 59 132 Park Edgewater 365 60 133 1030 West Sunnyside Avenue 144 14 134 4511 North Clark Street 56 139 Lincoln Park 135 Immaculata High School 220 138 136 Montrose Phase II, The 160 137 Winthrop Avenue Multi-Residential 84 109 140 138 Ashland Avenue 79 22 198 139 Bel Ray Redevelopment 136 62 61 Peggy Notebaert 140 Lincoln Park Plaza Phase II 57 198 Hotel Covent Redevelopment 114 Nature Museum 141 Optima Lakeview 246 Total Prospective 1,720 2000 ft Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND Lease-Up Under Construction Planned Prospective Chicago - Urban New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 1Q20 162 30 81
  • Chicago Region Congestion Management Highway Network

    Chicago Region Congestion Management Highway Network

    Chicago Region Congestion Management Highway Network 7 4 I 3 S L L 8 7 I R 1 3 L I A 1 3 1 I 3 L L 17 I 3 0 7 S IL 173 U R S A 1 1 IL 173 2 IL 173 0 4 U 173 SRA 307 S S IL R A IL 173 07 4 I 3 A 1 R L S 5 0 1 4 1 S 0 4 1 3 2 9 R 1 U S 5 A ( A S L G U I R 2 4 R S 1 7 5 3 US 12 2 S E 1 R E L I N A S I B L 6 R 0 8 A A 3 2 Y 4 0 R 8 O IL 132 Yorkhouse Road A D ) Yorkhouse Rd 73 1 L I I L 1 3 2 GOLF (G R SUNSET AVE IL S 3 R AN S 1 A GREENWOOD R D SRA 602 A 4 AV E) EN U 10 08 4 1 2 L I IL 8 3 Grand Ave S ) H D Clark/Division E A CHARLES RD R O IL 120 I S t D R R 0 SRA 508 e A 1 A e D N r 2 t N 0 SRA 508 0 6 2 R 2 L 1 A I 0 S A 1 2 O R R L e I A l S ( 8 0 0 l 6 12 RA 5 I IL S D 2 a US 0 L 14 7 12 0 1 3 4 S S Lake St S a SRA 2 A Chicago/State 00 L R A 5 U go Ave I Chica L 5 4 R 0 I 8 S L S Grayslake 1 20 U McHenry County Lake County Ontario St Ontario / Ohio Corridor Ohio St Illinois / Grand Corridor L EY RO Grand Ave CK A D) 3 BU 90 Illinois St 2 PETERSON ROAD ( I L 13 7 ¨§ L ¦ I SRA 211 Grand/State SRA 211 Ogilvie U U S Washington/Dearborn 14 S I L S 6 Libertyville 4 r 0 R 1 t o S State/Lake A ( d Clark/Lake i S k r r e 9 K Washington/State 2 a r W l 0 0 u 3 O o C Millennium Station 4 9 a n 2 K t C c n St e hingto 7 Was 4 A S ´ L I 1 I 4 k v s E e R 0 3 t e L t e A I ison St ad a I S M 1 H L t r S L n e i S n I 2 I s D v A 1 G i a e a Downtown Routes t l r R n r H i g S i i S P a v D l W n ms St SRA Route #'s Ada IL 176 h e P o s 6 s 7 c 1 s downtown are 411 I A s L i I r L e u IL 176 e e Jackson Blvd Y 6 f unless otherwise noted f M D D SRA 509 b 1 0 0 ) e 6 / A / J m US 20 SR 8 3 n ay u SRA 601 IL 176 Congress Parkw l o 290 o s r ¦¨§ C IL 60 (TOWNLINE ROAD) IL 60 e f 0 0.5 Crystal Lake f LaSalle St.
  • Chicago Arts + Industry Commonsave (CAIC)K Nort Avenue N West Fullerton V

    Chicago Arts + Industry Commonsave (CAIC)K Nort Avenue N West Fullerton V

    Chicago Arts + Industry Chicago,Commons IL N Table of Contents p03 Slide Deck p13 The Narrative 2 N Slide Deck 3 Kenwood Gardens Kenwood St. Laurence School Stony Island Arts Bank Garfield Park Industrial Arts ard e u n e v A h t ianapolis Boulev 5 Ind B e v A h t u o S levard apolis Bou treet Indian East 112th Street et outh S re t ast 108th S E e v A g n i w E h t u o S S ast 87th 87th ast Ave E South Avenue L Ewing South South Lake Shore Drive O e u n e v A h t u o treet S Ewing hore Dr hore ve S A outh Lake outh S South South Mackinaw Avenue 06th Street t 100th S hore Dr ve A S as st 1 South Buffalo Avenue E South Burley Avenue Ea South Harbor South t South Lake South South Shore Drive reet 1st Street h St East 93rd S ast 9 South Commercial Ave E East 95t al Ave al South Exchange Avenue ci East 92nd Street er Comm h h Sout Shore Drive t S South Muskegon 76th Ave East ny Avenue South Southt ho S venue Ant ast 75th ast A E uth ast 104th St hange So E East 83rd Street South Torrence Avenue South Exc South Colfax Ave treet d r a v e e l u t o a B Y h t u s o S South South Shore Drive tte arque t t M Dr S ue 100th ast Eas E rd S East 93 outh Anthony Aven e S riv an D es Dr y South V Ha ette South Jeffery Boulevard Vlissingen Rd st st qu a East 103rd Street E ar M nue e ast E East 76th Street ago Av East 87th Street ayes r D South Lake st H Shore Dr South Hyde Park Boulevard Ea outh South Chic t South Cornell Avenue S South Stony Island Avenue South Stony Island Ave ast 55th S South Stony Island Avenue treet E t S East 47th 47th East ast
  • N:\JOE\RTCP\Interim Progress Report\Links\Report Cover.Tif

    N:\JOE\RTCP\Interim Progress Report\Links\Report Cover.Tif

    Final Report Submitted to Regional Transportation Authority REGIONAL TRANSIT COORDINATION PLAN: LOCATION STUDY prepared by BOOZ·ALLEN & HAMILTON INC. in association with WELSH PLANNING July 2001 This report is confidential and intended solely for the use and information of the company to whom it is addressed Table of Contents Disclaimer Page.........................................................................................................................1 Section 1 – Project Summary...................................................................................................2 Section 2 – Study Purpose .......................................................................................................5 Section 3 – Background............................................................................................................7 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................7 3.2 Assessment of Transit Coordination ...................................................................8 3.2.1 Physical Coordination.............................................................................9 3.2.2 Service Coordination .............................................................................10 3.2.3 Fare Coordination ..................................................................................10 3.2.4 Information Coordination.....................................................................11 3.2.5 Other Themes and Issues......................................................................13
  • Intersession 2012

    Intersession 2012

    INTERSESSION 2012 In order to support students from the Class of 2014 in meeting their computer science requirement, the following opportunity is offered during intersession week. This is an additional opportunity during intersession week and participation in this session does not fulfill any intersession requirements. No sign- up is required to take advantage of this opportunity. Computer Science Requirement – Class of 2014 A semester of a computer science course at IMSA or passing the computer science proficiency test is a graduation requirement for the class of 2014. The review unit for the CS proficiency test is available to students on Moodle (IMSA non-credit courses--> Review material for CS proficiency test). During the intersession week, Dr. Pat and Ms. Pandya will be available on Monday and Tuesday between 8:30am - 11:30am, to answer any questions students may have about the review material in room A152. Tests will be administered at 6:00pm on Wednesday, 1:00pm on Thursday, and 8:30am on Friday in the A152. Students should allow for a little over two hours for the test. The review material is just a guideline for the test; students are expected to have general knowledge of computer science to be successful on the test. Students who elect to take the proficiency test and are unable to take it during intersession week may see Dr. Pat or Ms. Pandya in the Math Office to make alternate arrangements. The following two intersession experiences will be required for some students. Students will be notified of required participation no later than December 9, 2011.