DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resource Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Natural Resource Inventory PORTLAND PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT FALL 2009 Acknowledgments Natural Resource Inventory Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) PROSPERITY AND BUSINESS SUCCESS Mayor Sam Adams, Commissioner-in-charge Susan Anderson, Director SUSTAINABILITY AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Joe Zehnder, Chief Planner Steve Dotterrer, Principal Planner Eric Engstrom, Principal Planner DESIGN, PLANNING AND PUBLIC SPACES Gil Kelley, Former Director, Bureau of Planning Project Team NEIGHBORHOODS & HOUSING Roberta Jortner, Environmental Planning Manager, BPS Mindy Brooks; Shannon Buono; Katie Hinman; TRANSPORTATION, TECHNOLOGY AND ACCESS Kevin Martin; Chris Scarzello; Elliot Scott Document Cartography and Design EDUCATION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT Gary Odenthal, GIS Coordinator, BPS Christine Rains, Graphic Designer, BPS Contributors HUMAN HEALTH, FOOD AND PUBLIC SAFETY Bureau of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Group, with special recognition of: QUALITY OF LIFE, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND EQUITY Shannon Axtell; Jennifer Devlin; Dawn Hottenroth; Dave Helzer; Josh Robben; Chris Prescott; Ry Thompson; Ali Young ARTS, CULTURE AND INNOVATION Bureau of Parks and Recreation Mart Hughes; Deborah Lev Metro Lori Hennings; Justin Houk; Paul Ketcham Project Technical Reviewers Susan Barnes, Patty Snow, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Tom Bouillion, Port of Portland; Bob Eaton, Dave Hendricks, Multnomah County Drainage District; Paul Fishman, SWCA Environmental Consultants; Karen Font Williams, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality; Mike Houck, Urban Greenspaces Institute; Jim Labbe, Bob Sallinger, Audubon Society of Portland; Tom McGuire, Adolfson Associates; Nancy Munn, NOAA Fisheries; Jennifer Thompson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alan Yeakley, Portland State University To help ensure equal access to City programs, services and activities, the City of Portland will reasonably modify policies/procedures and provide auxiliary aids/services to persons with disabilities. Call (503) 823-7700 with such requests. www.PDXPlan.com Natural Resource Inventory PORTLAND PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT FALL 2009 Acknowledgments Natural Resource Inventory Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) ARTS & CULTURE Mayor Sam Adams, Commissioner-in-charge Susan Anderson, Director Joe Zehnder, Chief Planner CIVIC LIFE Steve Dotterrer, Principal Planner Eric Engstrom, Principal Planner COMMUNITY DESIGN Gil Kelley, Former Director, Bureau of Planning Project Team CONNECTIONS & ACCESS Roberta Jortner, Environmental Planning Manager, BPS Mindy Brooks; Shannon Buono; Katie Hinman; ECONOMIC VITALITY Kevin Martin; Chris Scarzello; Elliot Scott Document Cartography and Design EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY Gary Odenthal, GIS Coordinator, BPS Christine Rains, Graphic Designer, BPS Contributors ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Bureau of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Group, with special recognition of: HUMAN HEALTH Shannon Axtell; Jennifer Devlin; Dawn Hottenroth; Dave Helzer; Josh Robben; Chris Prescott; Ry Thompson; Ali Young NEIGHBORHOODS & HOUSING Bureau of Parks and Recreation Mart Hughes; Deborah Lev Metro Lori Hennings; Justin Houk; Paul Ketcham Project Technical Reviewers Susan Barnes, Patty Snow, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Tom Bouillion, Port of Portland; Bob Eaton, Dave Hendricks, Multnomah County Drainage District; Paul Fishman, SWCA Environmental Consultants; Karen Font Williams, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality; Mike Houck, Urban Greenspaces Institute; Jim Labbe, Bob Sallinger, Audubon Society of Portland; Tom McGuire, Adolfson Associates; Nancy Munn, NOAA Fisheries; Jennifer Thompson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alan Yeakley, Portland State University To help ensure equal access to City programs, services and activities, the City of Portland will reasonably modify policies/procedures and provide auxiliary aids/services to persons with disabilities. Call (503) 823-7700 with such requests. www.PDXPlan.com table of contents i ntroduction 1 p r o j e c t h i s t o r y 6 p r o j e c t a p p r oac h 7 Scientific Foundation 7 Inventory Steps 8 Sample Maps 15 p r o j e c t r esults, products & uses 20 Citywide Results and Comparison to Metro’s Regional Inventory 20 Watershed-Specific Results 22 Products and Uses 23 s tatus of inventorie d natural resources a n d n e x t s t e p s 27 Inventoried Natural Resources: Existing Protections 28 How the Natural Resource Inventory will Inform Upcoming Compliance Reports 32 The Natural Resource Inventory and the Portland Plan 35 maps Portland’s Current and Historic Streams 2 Natural Resource Inventory Areas 4 Environmental Zoning 4 Metro Regional Inventory of Riparian Corridors and Wildlife Habitat 6 Comparison Metro Habitat Concern and Portland Special Habitat Area: Reed Lake/Crystal Springs Creek 13 Johnson Creek and Powell Butte Natural Resource Inventory Map Series 16 Southwest Hills, Willamette River and Ross Island Natural Resource Inventory Map Series 18 Natural Resource Inventory Update – Landscape Features 20 Natural Resource Inventory Update – Combined Riparian and Wildlife Habitat Relative Ranks 21 City of Portland Natural Area Acquisition Strategy, 2006 26 Natural Resource Inventory Update – Resource Areas and Existing Environmental Overlay Zones 29 Resource Areas and Existing Environmental Overlay Zones – Southwest Hills 31 Metro Habitat Title 13 Conservation Areas and City Environmental Overlay Zones 32 Metro Habitat Conservation Areas and City Environmental Overlay Zones – Tryon Creek 33 Metro Habitat Conservation Areas and City Environmental Overlay Zones – Columbia Slough 33 Inventoried Natural Resources, Land Divisions, and Residential Building Permits, 2002 – 2007 34 Linking People to Portland’s Parks and Greenspaces 35 Natural Resource Inventory – Ranked Resources, 2040 Centers, Station Areas & Transportation Corridors 35 Metro Regional Parks, Trails and Open Space System 36 city of portland natural resource inventory update | p r o j e c t s u m m a r y r e p o r t D i s c u s s i o n D r a f t | september 2009 3 4 city of portland natural resource inventory update | p r o j e c t s u m m a r y r e p o r t D i s c u s s i o n D r a f t | september 2009 introduction introducing . p o r t l a n d ’ s n at u r a l r e s o u r c e i n v e n t o r y u p d at e p r o j e c t ! Overview This document summarizes Portland’s Natural Resource Inventory Update Project to date. A detailed account of this work is documented in the Portland Natural Resource Inventory: Riparian Corridors and Wildlife Habitat – Project Report, Discussion Draft June 2007. The updated inventory: • Greatly improves quality and accessibility The Introduction section describes the context and of information about riparian corridors and wildlife habitat in Portland need for the inventory update. The Project History • Is “information only” – does not propose section explains the project origin, and introduces programs or regulations Metro’s regional inventory which provided the scientific • Will inform and support many actions in the and methodological basis for the City inventory update. City’s River Renaissance Strategy, the Portland Watershed Management Plan, and the The Project Approach section highlights the science Portland Plan basis for the work, and outlines the steps taken to • Doesn’t start from scratch – builds on and customize the regional information and produce refines the well-vetted science and methods used to produce Metro’s regional resource new inventory information for Portland. Some key inventory information from the City inventory project is featured • Reflects the urban landscape, resource in the Project Results, Products and Uses section conditions range from good to highly including information about the types of natural degraded; includes “natural” and “constructed” features resources that exist today, their relative quality, current • Uses current data and state-of-the-art projections and program updates. The concluding mapping tools that allow the information to section outlines a set of Next Steps. be kept up-to-date over time city of portland natural resource inventory update | p r o j e c t s u m m a r y r e p o r t D i s c u s s i o n D r a f t | september 2009 1 introduction Portland would not be here today were it not for an and slows stormwater runoff, thereby reducing peak historic abundance of natural resources. The waterways, streamflows and flooding. Trees and vegetation also forests, woodlands and prairies, fish and fur-bearing filter sediments and pollutants. Such services reduce animals, and fertile soils, have supported people for costs to maintain and expand the City sewer systems thousands of years. and treatment facilities. Trees and vegetation help maintain healthful air quality, reduce energy demand, and help capture carbon dioxide which contributes to global warming. Trees are often associated with higher property values and desirable neighborhoods within which to live, work and play. 1 9 0 5 l o g r a f t c o n s t r u c t i o n o n t h e willamette river open channel and piped streams filled or diverted streams Today more than 576,000 people call Portland rivers and water bodies city of portland boundary home (PSU Population Research Center, 2008). The landscape has changed dramatically over the past 150 years. In some areas, much of the trees and vegetation have been removed to make way for roads and buildings. Many of the streams in Portland portland’s current and have been placed underground in pipes, and many historic streams of Portland’s waterways do not meet current water quality standards for pollution and temperature. Yet, a wealth of rivers, streams, wetlands, forests and other types of vegetation remain interwoven throughout Portland’s parks and natural areas, many residential neighborhoods, golf courses, cemeteries, college campuses, and along the Willamette River and in the Columbia River corridors. These natural resources provide important functions and services across today’s urban landscape. Rivers, streams, floodplains and wetlands provide conveyance and storage for streamflows and stormwater, and provide critical habitats for aquatic and terrestrial plants and animals.
Recommended publications
  • Title 13 – Nature in Neighborhoods R Equest for Metro Determination of Substantial Compliance

    Title 13 – Nature in Neighborhoods R Equest for Metro Determination of Substantial Compliance

    TITLE 13 – NATURE IN NEIGHBORHOODS R equest for Metro Determination of Substantial Compliance December 2012 Accepted by Portland City Council November 28, 2012 www.portlandoregon.gov/bps The Bureaus of Planning and Sustainability and Transportation are committed to providing equal access to information and hearings. If you need special accommodation, please call 503-823-7700, the City’s TTY at 503-823-6868, or the Oregon Relay Service at 1-800-735-2900. To obtain a copy of this document or more information about this project, please contact: Roberta Jortner, Senior Environmental Planner Bureau of Planning and Sustainability 1900 SW 4th Avenue, Suite 7100 Portland, OR 97201 Phone: 503-823-7855 | Email: [email protected] II TITLE 13, NATURE IN NEIGHBORHOODS – CITY OF PORTLAND COMPLIANCE REQUEST – DECEMBER 2012 A cknowledgements City Council B ureau of Environmental Services Sam Adams, Mayor and Commissioner in Charge Shannah Anderson Nick Fish Jane Bacchieri Amanda Fritz Susan Barthel Randy Leonard Mitch Bixby Dan Saltzman Eli Callison Amber Clayton Planning and Sustainability Commission Sara Culp Linda Dobson André Baugh, Chair Rhonda Fast Howard Shapiro, Vice Chair Robert Fraley Michelle Rudd, Vice Chair Emily Hauth Karen Gray Dawn Hottenroth Don Hanson Michele Juon Mike Houck Jennifer Karps Lai-Lani Ovalles Paul Ketcham Jill Sherman Kaitlin Lovell Chris Smith Dominic Maze Mike Rosen B ureau of Planning and Sustainability Darian Santner Susan Anderson, Director Marie Johnson Walkiewicz Joe Zehnder, Chief Planner Sallie
  • Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1

    Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1

    CK-12 FOUNDATION Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1 Akre CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-content, web-based collaborative model termed the “FlexBook,” CK-12 intends to pioneer the generation and distribution of high-quality educational content that will serve both as core text as well as provide an adaptive environment for learning. Copyright © 2010 CK-12 Foundation, www.ck12.org Except as otherwise noted, all CK-12 Content (including CK-12 Curriculum Material) is made available to Users in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution/Non-Commercial/Share Alike 3.0 Un- ported (CC-by-NC-SA) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/), as amended and updated by Creative Commons from time to time (the “CC License”), which is incorporated herein by this reference. Specific details can be found at http://about.ck12.org/terms. Printed: October 11, 2010 Author Barbara Akre Contributor Jean Battinieri i www.ck12.org Contents 1 Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1 1 1.1 Lesson 18.1: The Biodiversity Crisis ............................... 1 1.2 Lesson 18.2: Natural Resources .................................. 32 2 Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part I 49 2.1 Chapter 18: Ecology and Human Actions ............................ 49 2.2 Lesson 18.1: The Biodiversity Crisis ............................... 49 2.3 Lesson 18.2: Natural Resources .................................. 53 www.ck12.org ii Chapter 1 Ecology: Biodiversity and Natural Resources Part 1 1.1 Lesson 18.1: The Biodiversity Crisis Lesson Objectives • Compare humans to other species in terms of resource needs and use, and ecosystem service benefits and effects.
  • Natural Resources, Spring 1999

    Natural Resources, Spring 1999

    NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION TASK FORCE REPORT PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT The views expressed in this report are those of the Task Force members and were not the subject of endorsement by the full Council. Many of the federal officials who serve on the Council also serve on the Council’s Task Forces and participated actively in developing the Task Force’s recommendations, but those recommendations do not necessarily reflect Administration policy. PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TASK-FORCE-REPORT-ON-NATURAL RESOURCES To obtain copies of this Report, please contact: President’s Council on Sustainable Development 730 Jackson Place, NW Washington, D.C. 20503 1-800-363-3732 (202) 408-5296 Website: http://www.whitehouse.gov/PCSD TASK FORCE MEMBERSHIP CO-CHAIRS Richard Barth, Chairman, President, and CEO, Ciba-Geigy Corporation James R. Lyons, Undersecretary for Natural Resources and the Environment, U.S. Department of Agriculture Theodore Strong, Executive Director, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission MEMBERS Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior James Baker, Undersecretary for Oceans and Atmosphere, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Carol Browner, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency A.D. Correll, Chairman and CEO, Georgia-Pacific Corporation Fred D. Krupp, Executive Director, Environmental Defense Fund Michele Perrault, International Vice President, Sierra Club John C. Sawhill, President and CEO, The Nature Conservancy PRESIDENT’S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TASK-FORCE-REPORT-ON-NATURAL RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. ii INTRODUCTION. 1 CHAPTER 1:TASK FORCE APPROACH. 5 The Role of the Watershed.
  • Water Demand Management, Natural Resource Reconstruction and Traditional Value Systems: a Case Study from Yemen

    Water Demand Management, Natural Resource Reconstruction and Traditional Value Systems: a Case Study from Yemen

    WATER DEMAND MANAGEMENT, NATURAL RESOURCE RECONSTRUCTION AND TRADITIONAL VALUE SYSTEMS: A CASE STUDY FROM YEMEN Occasional Paper No. 14 Water Issues Study Group School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University of London By G. LichtenthŠler & A.R. Turton gl3&soas.ac.uk & [email protected] INTRODUCTION: Previous research has shown that under conditions of extreme water scarcity, such as in the Middle East, natural resource reconstruction can take place (Allen & Karshenas, 1996). This may not always be the case however, as certain societies seem better able to cope with this process than others. This phenomenon has been linked to the adaptive capacity of a society (Turton, 1999) where it has been shown that all social entities are not equally endowed. A shortage of adaptive capacity has been redefined as a second- order scarcity (Ohlsson, 1998; 1999). What is currently being regarded by most researchers as a manifestation of resource scarcity is in fact probably the result of a second-order scarcity of social resources, which impacts in turn on the way that social entities deal with the first order scarcity of a natural resource such as water. In terms of this thinking, a shift in emphasis to second-order scarcities would be appropriate. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that in a society where resource capture is being actively pursued, natural resource reconstruction is unlikely to occur because it reduces the overall legitimacy of the political system (Turton, 1999). A study of these aspects in Yemen (LichtenthŠler, 1999) is therefore considered to be extremely fruitful because of four fundamental reasons.
  • Optimize and Protect Your Natural Resources

    Optimize and Protect Your Natural Resources

    Get involved with EQIP The EQIP application process is continuous throughout the year. Information and applications Optimize can be obtained at any local NRCS Field Office. To find out if EQIP is a perfect fit for your operation, contact your local NRCS office at a and protect USDA Service Center in your area or click on to www.wa.nrcs.usda.gov. your natural Application Process The EQIP application process consists of the resources... EQIP can help producers improve irrigation water following five steps: efficiency. water that is lost to the field. 1. A landowner submits an application to In order to improve the application of water a local USDA Service Center, NRCS and make it more uniform, sprinkler irrigation office, or conservation district office. systems are cost-shared and installed. These 2. NRCS ranks each application using the systems apply water to the plant when needed locally developed natural resources at a rate the soil can manage. There is no deep ranking process. percolation or runoff with the sprinkler irrigation 3. When funds are allocated, NRCS system. What this means is a better use of the commits funds to high ranking resources; water, power, fertilizer, and chemicals applications. which equals better quality crops. 4. NRCS works with the applicant to develop an EQIP conservation plan and Irrigation Water Management contract containing practices which will With the installation of new irrigation solve identified resource problems. systems, landowners need to learn how and when 5. Following contract signature by to apply water. For most of the new systems it NRCS and the selected entity, funds is possible to apply water almost anytime it is are obligated to the project and the needed.
  • Natural Resource Economics - Jason F

    Natural Resource Economics - Jason F

    ECONOMICS INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES – Vol. II - Natural Resource Economics - Jason F. Shogren NATURAL RESOURCE ECONOMICS Jason F. Shogren University of Wyoming, Laramie, USA Keywords: natural resource, natural resource economics, non-renewable resource, renewable resource, biodiversity, non-market valuation Contents 1. Introduction 2. Non-renewable Resources 2.1 Optimal Depletion 2.2 Resource Scarcity 2.3 Energy 3. Renewable Resources 3.1 Fisheries (or Groundwater) 3.2 Forests 3.3 Commons and Property Rights 3.4 Regulation and Incentives 4. Protecting Biodiversity 5. Climate Protection 6. Non-market Valuation 7. Concluding Comments Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Natural resource economics examines how society can more efficiently use its scarce natural resources, both non-renewable resources, such as minerals and fossil fuels, and renewable resources, such as fisheries and forests. Theory and empirical research explores alternative models on how people and societies choose to use and manage their limited resources. For non-renewable resources, natural resource economics suggests that theUNESCO efficient path to extract such resources – EOLSS over time is to balance the market price with both the marginal extraction costs and the opportunity cost, or shadow price of extracting the resource sooner rather than later. This shadow price is also called the user cost, resourceSAMPLE royalty, or scarcity rent. User CHAPTERS costs capture the idea that there is an additional cost for extracting a resource today since it cannot be extracted tomorrow. Theory also suggests the scarcity rent should grow at a rate equal to the rate of interest. This is called Hotelling’s rule, which says that a unit of resource extracted in any period should yield the same rent, in present value terms.
  • Arlington's Natural Resources Management Plan

    Arlington's Natural Resources Management Plan

    ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Natural Resources Management Plan AN ELEMENT OF ARLINGTON COUNTY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTED November 13, 2010 State Champion Post Oak Natural Resources Management Plan November 2010 Arlington County Board Jay Fisette, Chairman, Christopher Zimmerman, Vice-Chairman, and Members Barbara A. Favola, Mary Hughes Hynes and J. Walter Tejada Barbara M. Donnellan, County Manager Dinesh Tiwari, Director, Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources Caroline Temmermand, Division Chief, Parks and Natural Resources Division The Natural Resources Management Plan was prepared by Greg Zell, Natural Resource Specialist, Department of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Resources, Parks and Natural Resources Division, Conservation and Interpretation Section. The following individuals provided assistance in the development of the Natural Resources Management Plan: Jamie Bartalon, Landscape and Forestry Section Supervisor; Larry Finch, Chairman, Urban Forestry Commission; Mary Ann Lawler, Urban Forestry Commission; Steve Campbell, Urban Forestry Commission; Dean Amel, Environment and Energy Conservation Commission; Shannon Cunniff, Chairman, Environment and Energy Conservation Commission; Caroline Haynes, Park and Recreation Commission, and Jim Olivetti, Park and Recreation Commission. Front Cover Photo Credits: John White, Gary Fleming, Greg Zell, and the Arlington County Department of Community Planning, Housing & Development. Other report photos by Greg Zell, unless otherwise indicated. Map Credits: Arlington County Department
  • Appraisal Manual for Centrally Valued Natural Resource Property

    Appraisal Manual for Centrally Valued Natural Resource Property

    Appraisal Manual For Centrally Valued Natural Resource Property Valuation Guidelines for Natural Resource Property Preface Preface The Department of Revenue’s Local Jurisdictions District is responsible for ensuring fair, accurate, and uniform property valuations as prescribed by Arizona statutes. The Local Jurisdictions District contains the Centrally Valued Property Unit which is responsible for producing this manual. The Centrally Valued Property Unit is responsible for determining the full cash value of certain utilities, railroads, airlines, private rail cars, mines, and other complex or geographically diverse property. With the exception of airline and private rail car valuations, the values are then transmitted for entry on the individual county tax rolls for levy and collection of property taxes. The manual is produced each year to serve as a guide in the appraisal of mines and other natural resource property. The techniques, procedures, and factors described in the manual are reviewed annually and revised in accordance with standard appraisal methods and techniques along with changes in statutes, rules, and regulations. Revisions are also made based on case law decisions. The procedures described in the manual are designed to assist the appraiser in the application of the income, cost, and market approach methods of valuation to these properties for the current tax year. This manual is intended for use in ad valorem appraisal of specific centrally valued property including producing mines, certain non-producing mines, qualifying environmental technology property and oil, gas, and geothermal interests in Arizona. The guidelines in this manual are used to establish full cash values for these properties as of January 1 of the valuation year.
  • Abundance and Distribution of Fish Species in City of Portland Streams

    Abundance and Distribution of Fish Species in City of Portland Streams

    ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF FISH SPECIES IN CITY OF PORTLAND STREAMS COMPLETION REPORT 2009 Project Period: 1 March 2008 to 30 June 2009 Prepared by: Erick S. Van Dyke Adam J. Storch Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Ocean Salmon and Columbia River Program Clackamas, OR Prepared for: City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services Portland, OR 97204-1912 IGA Number 020-8038 December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................1 STUDY AREA ...................................................................................................................................2 METHODS .........................................................................................................................................5 Seasonal Fish Assemblage and Abundance...............................................................................6 Fish Presence in Summer Habitat Units ....................................................................................8 Index of Biotic Integrity.............................................................................................................9 RESULTS .........................................................................................................................................10 Seasonal Fish Assemblage and Abundance.............................................................................10
  • Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Natural Resource Management

    Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Natural Resource Management

    Guidance Note UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (SES) Standard 1: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Natural Resource Management December 2020 UNDP Guidance Notes on the Social and Environmental Standards (SES) This Guidance Note is part of a set of operational guidance materials related to the UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (SES). UNDP’s SES seek to (i) strengthen quality of programming by ensuring a principled approach; (ii) maximize social and environmental opportunities and benefits; (iii) avoid adverse impacts to people and the environment; (iv) minimize, mitigate, and manage adverse impacts where avoidance is not possible; (v) strengthen UNDP partner capacities for managing social and environmental risks; and (vi) ensure full and effective stakeholder engagement, including through mechanisms to respond to complaints Key Elements of the SES from project-affected people. The SES guidance notes follow a similar structure to assist users in finding specific information or guidance (however the SESP Guidance Note focuses on the steps of the screening process). The set of guidance notes will develop over time to include specific guidance on each of the SES Programming Principles, Project-level Standards, and elements of the Social and Environmental Management System (see Key Elements of the SES). The SES Toolkit is an on-line resource for the guidance notes and supporting materials. How to Use This Guidance Note The target users for the SES guidance notes are staff, consultants, stakeholders and partners who are involved in developing, assessing and implementing projects that invoke UNDP’s SES. To facilitate use of the overall package of SES guidance, users should understand that the guidance notes: • Are structured around the process of screening, social and environmental assessment, and management (including monitoring).
  • Notes on Energy Resources.Pdf

    Notes on Energy Resources.Pdf

    Energy Resources Ms. Steinberg Energy Resource- • A natural resource that can be converted by humans into other forms of energy in order to do useful work – Natural resource- any natural substance, organism, or energy form living things use • The sun is our most important energy resource. Renewable Resources- • A natural resource that can be used and replaced over a relatively short time Renewable Resources (cont’d) • Biomass – Organic matter that contains stored energy or energy produced by heat within the Earth’s crust • Ex: plants, wood, and waste – Nonindustrialized countries rely heavily on biomass for energy. – Gasohol- Plant material that is changed into liquid fuel • Ex: Plants containing sugar or starch can be made into alcohol. The alcohol is burned as a fuel or mixed with gasoline to form the gasohol. • Geothermal energy – Harness heat from the Earth – Ground water that seeps into hot spots near the surface of the Earth can form geysers. (Natural vents in which steam and water escape) • Ex: Old Faithful in Yellowstone National Park • The steam is used in power plants to generate electricity. • Hydroelectric energy – Electricity produced by falling water – Recycled through the water cycle • Ex: dams Renewable Resources (cont’d) • Solar energy – Energy from the sun – 2 common ways (indirectly or directly): 1. Sunlight can be changed into electricity by the use of solar cells. – Ex: solar calculator, solar panels (large panels made up of many solar cells wired together) 2. Solar collectors- dark-colored boxes with glass or plastic
  • OVERCONSUMPTION? Our Use of the World´S Natural Resources This Report Was Financially Supported By

    OVERCONSUMPTION? Our Use of the World´S Natural Resources This Report Was Financially Supported By

    OVERCONSUMPTION? Our use of the world´s natural resources This repOrT was financially suppOrTed by Working Committee “Forum mineralische Rohstoffe” of the Austrian association for building materials and ceramic industries Federal Environment Agency, Germany SUPPORTED BY Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, Austria Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland CREDITS: RESEARCH: Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI), Austria and GLOBAL 2000 (Friends of the Earth Austria) – IN COOPERATION WITH: Institute for Economic Structures Research (GWS), Germany – TEXT: Stefan Giljum, Friedrich Hinterberger, Martin Bruckner, Eva Burger, Johannes Frühmann, Stephan Lutter, Elke Pirgmaier, Christine Polzin, Hannes Waxwender, Lisa Kernegger, Michael Warhurst – INFO-GRAPHICS: Roswitha Peintner ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We thank Nicky Stocks, Becky Slater, Kenneth Richter and Hannah Griffiths from Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland (FoE EWNI) as well as Christian Lutz and Bernd Meyer from GWS for their assistance with the content of this report. – EDITING: Becky Slater and Michael Warhurst – PRODUCTION: Lisa Kernegger and Stefan Giljum – DESIGN: Hannes Hofbauer – PHOTO-EDITING: Steve Wyckoff – PHOTOS: Jiri Rezac/WWF-UK (p5), iStockphoto (p8, p11, p16, p18, p21, p22, p25, p28, p31), Elaine Gilligan/FoE EWNI (p12), Asociación Civil LABOR (p13), Aulia Erlangga/FoE EWNI (p14), Michael Common/Green Net (p19), Michael Warhurst/FoE EWNI (p30, p32), Cover: iStockphoto – PRINTING: Janetschek, A-3860 Heidenreichstein, www.janetschek.at – PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER © SERI, GLOBAL 2000, Friends of the Earth Europe, September 2009 2 | OVERCONSUMPTION? Our use of the world’s natural resources execuTive summary atural resources, including materials, water, energy and Europe thus benefits from a major transfer of resources N fertile land, are the basis for our life on Earth.