DOCSLIB.ORG

MIL-HDBK-1791.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MIL-HDBK-1791.Pdf ●L ..?./-,,,? NOTE: MIL-STD-1791(USAF)has been redesignatedasa handbook,and is to be used for guidance purposes only. This document is no: longer to be cited as a requirement. For administrative expediency, the only physical chafige jom Ml L-STD-l 791 (USAF) is this cover -& .. page. However, this document is no longer to b%”’cited as a requirement. If cited as a requirement, contractors may disregard the requirements of this document and interpret its contents only as guidance. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE NliL-1-ii3BK-f 791 (USAF) 14 Februarv 1997 SUPERSEDING MlL-STD-l 791 (USAF) NOTICE 3 14 February 1997 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK DESIGNING FOR INTERNAL AERIAL DELlVERY IN FIXED WING AIRCRAFT THIS HANDBOOK IS FOR GUIDANCE ONLY DO NOT CITE THIS DOCUMENT AS A REQUIREMENT AMSC N/A FSC 1510 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A.” Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited, --- ,&- --- .. ~ ., MIL-STD-1791 (Usu) 31 October 1985 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 0’ Washington DC 2D350 -: DESIGNING FOR INTERNAL AERIAL DELIVERY IN FIXED WING AIRCRAFT MIL-STD-1791 (USAF) 1. This Military Standard is approved for use within the Department of the Air Force and is available for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense. 2’. Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any per- tinent data which may be of use in improving this document should be addressed to: ASD/ENES, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-6503 by using the self-addressed Standardization Document Improvement Proposal (DD Form 1426) appearing at the end of this document or by letter. —. ,.b-- ii 9) MIL-STD-1791 (USAF) 31 October 1985 FOREWORD This standard establishes general design and performance requirements for military equipment to be air transported in or airdropped from the cargo compartments of fixed wing aircraft. The standard covers the three USAF prime mission cargo aircraft (C-130, C-141B, and C-5) as well as the cargo aircraft in the long range international segment of the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (B-747), DC-10, B-707, and DC-8). The structural and dimensional criteria for other cargo aircraft are documented in specific manuals for each aircraft. % The format of this document incorporates the basic standard containing general and detail requirements with associated verification criteria, and administra- . tive information. Two appendices supplement the basic standard. Appendix A, User Handbook for MIL-STD-1791, contains the rationale, guidance, and lessons learned for both the detail requirements and verification criteria. Appendix B, Air Transportability Design Information, consists of multiple sections. The first section presents general info~ation on the military aircraft features and limits, restraint criteria and applications, and unit load device design. The next three sections present C-130, C-141B, and C-5 structural and dimensional criteria and cargo item considerations. The last section covers load planning for the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRA.F)(TO-1-C-XXX-9). For other military aircraft, refer to that aircraft’s dash 9 loading manual. For other commercial aircraft, refer to the specific aircraft weight and balance manual. @ A particularly useful feature of Appendix A is a matrix showing’ design requirements appropriate to various types of cargo item configurations. It is intended as a guide for the user in determining which criteria should be con- sidered for a particular design situation. User comments are solicited in an effort to improve this feature. ... 111 MIL-STD-1791 (USAF) 31 October 1985 1. SCOPE 1.1 Ceneral. This standard covers general design and performance require- ments of military equipment for internal air transport in military prime mission cargo aircraft and the long range international segment of the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAP). This standard also contains general design and per- formance requirements for military equipment to be airdropped from Air Force cargo aircraft. The complete air transportability and airdrop requirements for an item of equipment not specified herein shall be specified in the indi- vidual equipment specification. 1.2 Applicability. The requirements and tests contained in this standard apply to the internal air transportability and airdrop aspects of all items intended for aerial delivery in CRAP or USAF aircraft. They represent the minimum acceptable transportability and airdrop features. When it is known that the equipment will require features that are more restrictive then those stated herein, the more stringent features will be specified in the individual equipment specification. 1.3 Deviations 1.3.1 Design improve~nt.. Any projected design that will improve perform- ancee, safety, or reliability or reduce life cycle and end item cost through deviations from this standard, or where the requirements of this standard result in a compromise of the item for the sake of air transportability or airdrop, shall be brought to the attention of the procuring activity for con- ● sideration. 2. EEFBBEECED DOCUMBMTS 2.1 Government documents 2.1.1 Specifications, standards, and handbooks. Unless otherwise specified, the following specifications, standards, and handbooks of the issue listed in that issue of the Department of Defense-Index of Specifications and Standards (DODISS) specified in the solicitation form a part of this standard to the extent specified herein. SPECIFICATIONS Military MIL-T-25959 Tie Down, Cargo, Aircraft MIL-T-27260 Tie Down, Cargo, Aircraft, CCU-1/B MIL-P-27443 Pallets, Cargo, Aircraft, Type HCU-6/E, HCU-12/E, and HCU-10/C MIL-N-27444 Net, Cargo Tiedown, Pallets HCU-7/E, HCU-15/C, HCU-11/C, and HCU-16/C 1 MIL-STD-1791 (USAF) 31 October 1985 STANDARDS Military MIL-STD-129 Marking for Shipment and Storage MIL-STD-209 Slinging and Tiedown Provisions for Lifting and Tying Down-Miiitary Equipment llIL-sTD-331 Fuze and Fuze Components, Environmental and Performance ● ✎ Tests for MIL-STD-669 Loading Environment and Related Requirements for Platform Rigged Airdrop Material ✎ MIL-STD-81O Environmental Test Methods and Engineering Guidelines MIL-STD-814 Requirements for Tiedown, Suspension and Extraction Provisions on Military Materiel for Airdrop 2.1.2 Other Govermnt docaments, drawings, ●nd pablicationa. The following other Government documents, drawings, and publications form a part of this standard to the extent specified herein. Air Force Regulations AFR 76-2 Airlift Planning Factors Joint Regulations AFR 71-4/ Preparation of Hazardous Materials for Military TM38-250/ Air Shipment NAVSUP PUB 505/ MCO P4030.19/ DLAM 4145.3 AR 70-44/ DOD Engineering for Transportability OPNAVINST 4600.22B/ AFR 80-18/ MCO 4610.14C/ DLAR 4500.25 AFLCR 800-29/ Policies and Procedures for Hazardous Materials AFSCR 800-29/ Package Certification DARCC?4-R700-103/ NAVMATINST 4030.llA/ DLAR 4145.37 AFR 76-38/ Department of Defense (DOD) Common User Airlift AR 59-8 Transportation MIL-STD-1791 (USAF) 31 October 1985 Joint Regulations AFR 71-4/ Preparation of Hazardous Materials for Military Air TM38-250/ Shipment NAVSUP PUB 505/ MCO P4030.19/ DLAM 4145.3 AR 70-44/ DOD Engineering for Transportability OPNAVINST 4600.22B/ e AFR 80-18/ MCO 4610.14C/ DLAR 4500.25 .4 AFLCR 800-29/ Policies and Procedures for Hazardous Materials AFSCR 800-29/ Package Certification DARCOM-R 700-103/ NAVMATINST 4030.llA/ DLAR 4145.37 Code of Federal Regulations Title 49 Parts 100-199 Code of Federal Regulations Field Manuals/Technical Orders . FM-lo-5ol/ TO 13C7-1-11 Airdrop of Supplies and Equipment: Rigging Containers International Standardization Agreements ASCC 44/21 Air Standard Criteria for the Design of Equipment Required to be Air Transported or Airdropped from Fixed Wing and Rotary Wing Transport Aircraft NATO STANAG 3548TN Tiedown Fittings on Air Transported and Airdropped Equipment and Cargo Internally by Fixed Wing Aircraft (Copies of specifications, 8tandards, handbooks, drawing8, publications, and other Government document8 required by contractor in connection with specific acquisition functions should be obtained from the contracting activity or as directed by the contracting activity.) 3 141L-STD-1791(USAF) 31 October 1985 Federal Aviation Regulation FAR, Part 25 Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes Code of Federal Regulations Title 49, Parts 100-199 Code of Federal Regulations Field Manuals/Technical Orders FM-10-501/ Airdrop of Supplies and Equipment: TO 13C7-1-11 Rigging Containers (Copies of specifications, standards, handbooks, drawingaa a~d+ publicat~ons required by contractors in connection with specific acquisition functions should be obtained from the contracting activity or as directed by the contracting officer.) 2.2 Order of precedence. In the event of a conflict between the text of this standard and the references cited herein, the text of this standard shall take precedence. 3. 3.1 Aerial delivery. The act or process of delivering cargo or personnel by air transport or airdrop. 3.2 Air Cergo. Any goods or material shipped or consigned by air. 3.3 Airdrop. Delivery of personnel or cargo from aircraft in flight. Five curre~hods of airdrop are free drop, low velocity drop, high velocity drop, staged drop, and low altitude parachute extraction. 3.4 Airdrop item. The equipment in its reduced configuration for airdrop, including external or internal loads such as fuel, ammunition, field gear, or rations. 3.5 Airdrop might. The weight of the airdrop item. 3.6 Air tremportability test loading ●gency (ATTLA). An agency of the US Air Force established to serve as the focal point for all air transporta- bility tests and clearance of items of equipment for movement on USAF cargo aircraft and the long-range international segment of the Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAP). 3.7 Air treesport. Delivery of personnel or cargo from point to point in which the cargo is delivered by airlanding. 3.8 Air trenoportable. Denotes equipment and cargo items which can be carried in an aircraft with not more than minor dismantling and reassembling within the capabilities of user units.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AVIATION Disaster Litigation and Investigations
    AVIATION Disaster Litigation and Investigations Attorney Advertising Our attorneys litigate diverse and complex cases for plane crash victims and their families throughout the world and injured crash survivors, as well as people who have suffered as a result of aviation security, safety, or passenger rights violations. At Motley Rice, our goal is not only to seek justice and compensation for our clients, but we also seek accountability from defendants and improvements in aviation safety and security standards. We give our clients a voice when they feel the most vulnerable. MARY F. SCHIAVO Licensed in DC, FL, MD, MO, SC JAMES R. BRAUCHLE Licensed in SC Our Approach At Motley Rice, our goal is not only to seek improvements in aviation safety and security standards through our civil justice system but also to give our clients a voice at a time in their lives when they feel the most vulnerable and to win for them the compensation they are owed and the changes they deserve. At Motley Rice, we work to help aviation disaster COMPASSION, GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT survivors and victims’ families, as well as victims We understand the pain, confusion and questions that of passenger rights violations and other safety and often follow tragic events and know that many clients security violations. feel overwhelmed by the emotional circumstances Our aviation attorneys have experience handling a which brought them to us. While coping with the loss wide variety of aviation cases. We recognize that of a loved one or the devastation of a permanent injury, survivors and family members of victims have many survivors and family members face numerous other concerns following an aviation disaster and may face obstacles such as medical expenses, loss of income considerations of complex legal rights and actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Normal Operations Monitoring
    Normal Operations Monitoring A New Approach to Measuring and Managing Human and Safety Performance Tested in Aviation Ground Handling Louise Raggett A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Aviation University of New South Wales September 2016 1 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Raggett First name: Louise Other name/s: Claire Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: AVIAAR1900 -Aviation, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) School: Aviation Faculty: Science Title: Normal Operations Monitoring - A new approach to measuring and monitoring human and safety performance - tested in aviation ground operations Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) Unlike flight operations, which is now regarded as an 'Ultra-safe system' (Amalberti 2001, p. 109) aviation ground safety has languished behind the rest of the industry (Verschoor and Young 2011), with activities on the ramp now accounting for more than a quarter of all incidents (Balk and Bossenbroek 2010). In recent years, both 'damage to aircraft and harm to ground personnel have escalated' (Passenier 2015 p. 38) costing air carriers more than USD10 billion annually (GAO 2007) Models and measures influential to aviation safety are reviewed for their possible contribution to the ground safety problem. The Threat and Error Management Model (TEM) and line Operation Safety Audit (LOSA) method (Klinect, Murray, Merritt and Helmreich 2003) were identified as potential candidates and critically examined for their suitability. The aim of the current research was to develop an approach that builds on the existing benefits of LOSA, whilst incorporating contemporary theories of safety science, and improving data reliability and validity where possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Atpl-Mass-And-Balance
    ATPL Mass & Balance © Atlantic Flight Training All rights reserved. No part of this manual may be reproduced or transmitted in any forms by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from Atlantic Flight Training in writing. ATPL Mass and Balance 27 October 2003 CHAPTER 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................1-1 CAP 696 - JAR FCL Examinations Loading Manual................................................................................1-1 Section 1 - General Notes (Pages 1 to 4) ................................................................................................1-2 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................1-2 Conversions (Page 4) ..............................................................................................................................1-3 CHAPTER 2 Mass and Balance Theory Centre of Gravity (CG).............................................................................................................................2-1 Effect of Mass (Weight)............................................................................................................................2-2 Balance Arm (BA) ....................................................................................................................................2-2
    [Show full text]
  • SL Report 2007/08 REPORT on the SERIOUS INCIDENT at OSLO
    SL Report 2007/08 REPORT ON THE SERIOUS INCIDENT AT OSLO AIRPORT GARDERMOEN ON 21 SEPTEMBER 2004 INVOLVING FLIGHT KAL520 BOEING 747-400F REGISTERED HL7467 OPERATED BY KOREAN AIR This report has been written in English and published by the AIBN to facilitate access by international readers. SUBMITTED March 2007 Accident Investigation Board Norway P.O. Box 213 NO-2001 Lillestrøm Norway Phone: + 47 63 89 63 00 Fax: + 47 63 89 63 01 http://www.aibn.no E-mail: [email protected] The Accident Investigation Board has compiled this report for the sole purpose of improving flight safety. The object of any investigation is to identify faults or discrepancies which may endanger flight safety, whether or not these are causal factors in the accident, and to make safety recommendations. It is not the Board’s task to apportion blame or liability. Use of this report for any other purpose than for flight safety should be avoided. Accident Investigation Board Norway Page 2 INDEX NOTIFICATION ....................................................................................................................... 3 SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... 3 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION.................................................................................... 4 1.1 History of the flight ................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Injuries to persons......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Aviation Requirements Section 2 - Airworthiness Series 'X' Part- Ii 14Th May, 1993 Effective: Forthwith
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION TECHNICAL CENTRE, OPP. SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT, NEW DELHI-110 003 CIVIL AVIATION REQUIREMENTS SECTION 2 - AIRWORTHINESS SERIES 'X' PART- II 14TH MAY, 1993 EFFECTIVE: FORTHWITH File No. 11-690/X-II/CAR/07/AI(2) Subject : Weight and Balance Control of Aircraft. 1. INTRODUCTION : Rule 58 of Aircraft Rules, 1937 requires that every aircraft shall be weighed and its centre of gravity determined. This CAR lays down the frequency of weighment and preparation of weight schedule and also the requirement about display or carriage of the weight schedule on board besides the manner of distribution and securing the load in the aircraft. 2. DEFINITIONS : 2.1 Empty Weight : Means the measured or computed weight of an aircraft, excluding the weight of all removable equipment and other items of disposable load, but including the weight of all items of fixed operating equipment or other equipment which are mandatory for all operations like fixed ballast, engine coolant, hydraulic fluid and fuel and oil quantities (both trapped and unusable) in the aircraft and engine system. 2.2 Limits of Centre of Gravity : Means the most forward and most rearward Centre of Gravity position within which an aircraft may be operated safely. These limits are specified in Certificate of Airworthiness/Flight Manual of an aircraft. 2.3 Maximum Take-off Weight : Means the maximum weight, according to its Certificate of Airworthiness or Flight Manual, at which an aircraft is permitted to take-off. 2.4 Removable Equipment : Means items of equipment which are carried on some of or on all flights, but which are not included in Empty weight and which are not mandatory for the type of operation being conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Deployment
    ßY) > Off PYi] FM 55-65 î I STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT .K HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ®entegen Libran/ fANR-PL)^ ATTN Miliîarv documents SictfOh Kooiti 1A51S Pentagon <Afasnirjgtor>0 DC 2O31O-§0^ DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. TM 55-65 FIELD MANUAL HEADQUARTERS No. 55-65 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 3 October 1995 STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT a. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE v CHAPTER 1. MOBILIZATION AND STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT OVERVIEW Force Projection 1-2 Mobilization 1-2 Deployment Phases 1-3 Deployment Planning 1-6 Deployment Command Channels 1-9 CHAPTER 2. STRATEGIC MOBILITY AUTOMATION SUPPORT SYSTEMS Strategic Planning Systems 2-1 Army Mobilization and Operations Planning Execution System 2-2 Global Transportation Network 2-2 Transportation Coordinator-Automated Information for Movements System 2-2 Transportation Coordinator-Automated Command and Control Information System 2-2 TC-ACCIS Airload Module 2-5 A Computer Aided Loading and Manifesting System 2-5 Computerized Movement Planning and Status System 2-5 Worldwide Port System 2-6 Improved Computerized Deployment System 2-6 Automated System for Processing Unit Requirements 2-6 Department of the Army Movement Management System-Redesign 2-7 Unit Movement Data Transactions for Crisis Response 2-7 Personnel Deployment Planning Systems 2-7 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. ♦This publication supersedes FM 55-65,10 May 1989. i CHAPTER 3. STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT PLANNING AND PREPARATION AT MACOM LEVEL AND BELOW Levels of Responsibility 3-1 Movement Planning Process 3-4 Support Requirements 3-9 Unit Alert 3-9 Soldier Readiness Processing : 3-9 Personal Responsibilities 3-10 Individual Clothing and Equipment Inspection 3-11 Security 3-11 Overseas Orientation 3-11 Clearance From the Installation 3-12 Maintenance 3-12 CHAPTER 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Agreement Document Boeing 777-8/9 Airport Compatibility Group (BACG2)
    Common Agreement Document Boeing 777-8/9 Airport Compatibility Group (BACG2) May 2018 Common Agreement Document Boeing 777-8/9 1 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 BACG2 Terms of Reference .............................................................................. 3 1.2 Purpose of the Document................................................................................... 3 1.3 Primary Conditions of Application ...................................................................... 4 1.4 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................... 5 2 Methodology Overview ................................................................................................ 6 3 Airfield Items Review ................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Runways ............................................................................................................ 9 3.3 Taxiways .......................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Runway Separations ........................................................................................ 12 3.5 Taxiway and Taxilane Separations .................................................................. 14 3.6 Other Items .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Safety Letter Satellite System
    Transport Transports debrief Canada Canada TP 185E Issue 2/2008 Goodbye, 121.5: Major Changes Are Coming to the SAR Satellite System on February 1, 2009 by Nancy Lugg, Aerodrome Safety Engineer, Policy and Regulatory Services, Civil Aviation, Transport Canada Debrief Debrief On February 1, 2009, the international search and aviation community. This included evaluating alternative rescue (SAR) satellite system, COSPAS-SARSAT, will no technologies for ensuring the prompt notification and longer process signals from 121.5 or 243 MHz emergency location of downed aircraft. locator transmitters (ELT). Why? As of that date, the system will complete its transition to digital 406 MHz-only Twenty-eight highly qualified participants from industry and technology, which presents a faster, more capable, and more government, having a wide range of technical and operational reliable form of distress alerting. The switch to 406 MHz expertise, met over eighteen formally scheduled meetings emergency beacons has been made across Canada and around between February and June 2007. The Team consisted of the world by marine and land-based users. representatives from the Canadian Forces, the National Search and Rescue Secretariat (NSS), Transport Canada, With these changes, after February 1, 2009, the 121.5 MHz the Canadian Owners and Pilots Association (COPA), ELT from a downed aircraft will not be detected by the the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), the Air Transport aviation safety letter satellite system. Alerting of the SAR system could be Association of Canada (ATAC), and the Air Canada Pilots significantly delayed, adversely affecting the survival of pilots Association (ACPA). Debrief and passengers and causing anguish to friends and families.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Packing and Handling in Cargo Security
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. ,.. ROLE OF PACKING AND HANDLING IN CARGO SECURITY NCJR~ NOV B \918 PACKING GUIDELINES FOR SAFE, SECURE DELIVERY OF GOODS • :~ . • • Produced Under The Auspices Of The NATIONAL CARGO SECURITY PROGRAM City Campaign in NEW YORK CITY/NEWARK by U.S. DEPAR1'MENT OF TRANSPORTATION and THE AIRPORT SECURITY COUNCIL September 1978 FOREWORD Cargo loss; cargo damage; claims; surveys and their cost; wasteful handling and its cost; all these are financial drains, eroding the profit of the shipping public and transportation carriers. No shipper or carrier should hesitate to take action which would materially reduce avoidable waste of money, time and customer goodwill. The report that follows provides gen­ eral guidelines on basic packing and environmental factors of transportation necessary to protect cargo from loss and damage. William E. Morgan Director, Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration New Y orkiN" ewark Coordinator of the X ational Cargo Security Program's City Campaign Edward J. McGowan Executive Director Airport Security Council I 1 I J j ~ CONTENTS Page P AOKING OONSIDERATIONS ________________________________ _ 1 Oarriers' Requirements _______________________________________ _ 1 Packing ____________________________________________________ _ 2 Know Your Product _________________________________________ _ 2 Method of Distribution ______________________________________ _ 2 Overseas Shiplnent __________________________________________ _ 2 'Talue of Product
    [Show full text]
  • Fljasa INFORMATION SERVICE' a T Usdfpartmenrofcommerce National Aeronautics and SPRINGFIEL., VA 22161 Space Administration
    NASA Contract6r Report 158914 Volume 3 )(NASA-CR-158914) CARGO LOGISTICS AIRLIFT N79-271'12' SYSTEMS STUDY (CLASS). VOLUME 3: CROSS THRU IMPACT BETWEEN THE 1-990 MARKET AND THE AIR N79-27115 -PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, BOOK 1 Unclas. (Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc.-) 383 p G3/03 29106 Cargo Logistics Airlift Systems Study (CLASS) Volume 3. Cross InpactBetween te 1990 Market and the Air PhysicabDisiributinn Systems Book 1, R. J. Burby W. H. Kuhlman McDonnell Douglas Corporation Douglas Aircraft Company Long Beach, California 90846 Contract NAS1-14948 October 1978 REPRODUCEDBY ENATIONALTECHNICAL flJASA INFORMATION SERVICE' A t USDFPARTMENrOFCOMMERCE National Aeronautics and SPRINGFIEL., VA 22161 Space Administration Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia 23665 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Technical Information Service N79-27112-27115 CARGO LOGISTICS AIRLIFT SYSTEMS STUDY (CLASS) VOLUME 3. CROSS IMPACT BETWEEN THE 1990 MARKET AND THE AIR PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS BOOK 1 R.J. Burby, et al McDonnell Douglas Corporation Long Beach,, California October 1978 NOTICE THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM THE BEST COPY FURNISHED US BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CERTAIN PORTIONS AR-E ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RELEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE. CARGO/LOGISTICS AIRLIFT SYSTEMS STUDY (CLASS) VOLUME III - CROSS IMPACT BETWEEN THE 1990 MARKET AND THE AIR PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS BOOK 1 JUNE 1978 By R. J. Burby, Program Manager W. H. Kuhlman, Principal Investigator Flying Tiger Line, Subcontractor Distribution of this report is provided in the interest of information exchange. Responsibility for the contents resides with the organization that prepared it.
    [Show full text]