Role of Packing and Handling in Cargo Security
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
AVIATION Disaster Litigation and Investigations
AVIATION Disaster Litigation and Investigations Attorney Advertising Our attorneys litigate diverse and complex cases for plane crash victims and their families throughout the world and injured crash survivors, as well as people who have suffered as a result of aviation security, safety, or passenger rights violations. At Motley Rice, our goal is not only to seek justice and compensation for our clients, but we also seek accountability from defendants and improvements in aviation safety and security standards. We give our clients a voice when they feel the most vulnerable. MARY F. SCHIAVO Licensed in DC, FL, MD, MO, SC JAMES R. BRAUCHLE Licensed in SC Our Approach At Motley Rice, our goal is not only to seek improvements in aviation safety and security standards through our civil justice system but also to give our clients a voice at a time in their lives when they feel the most vulnerable and to win for them the compensation they are owed and the changes they deserve. At Motley Rice, we work to help aviation disaster COMPASSION, GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT survivors and victims’ families, as well as victims We understand the pain, confusion and questions that of passenger rights violations and other safety and often follow tragic events and know that many clients security violations. feel overwhelmed by the emotional circumstances Our aviation attorneys have experience handling a which brought them to us. While coping with the loss wide variety of aviation cases. We recognize that of a loved one or the devastation of a permanent injury, survivors and family members of victims have many survivors and family members face numerous other concerns following an aviation disaster and may face obstacles such as medical expenses, loss of income considerations of complex legal rights and actions. -
TOPS®Pro Package Design and Pallet Software
TOPSPro Package Design and Pallet Software User’s Guide Version 6.8 July 2017 Print Version TOPS Software Corporation Copyright © 1996-2017 TOPS® Software Corporation. All rights reserved. The software described in this document is furnished under a license agreement. The software may be used or copied only in accordance with the terms of the agreement. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, for any purpose without the express written permission of TOPS® Software Corporation. Information in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent product specification or commitment on the part of TOPS® Software Corporation. Windows is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Word™ is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel™ is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Power Point™ is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation. TOPS® is a registered trademark of TOPS Software Corporation. MAXLOAD® is a registered trademark of TOPS® Software Corporation. MIXLOAD® is a registered trademark of TOPS Software Corporation. Adobe Acrobat© is a registered trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated. TOPS® Software Corporation 1301 Central Expy South, Suite 200 Allen, Texas 75013 USA Telephone: (972) 739-8677 Facsimile: (972) 739-9478 Information: [email protected] Technical Support: [email protected] Sales: [email protected] MVP [email protected] Web Site: www.topseng.com Table of Contents Preface .........................................................................................................................ii -
Packaging, Labeling, and Shipping Requirements
0 Rev 1 Packaging, Labeling, and Shipping Requirements Commercial Lighting Packaging, Labeling, and Shipping Requirements September 2019 Racine, Wisconsin, USA LSC016 1 Rev 1 Packaging, Labeling, and Shipping Requirements Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Compliance .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 AIAG Guidelines ............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 Primary Container Requirements ................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Selection of a Primary Container .................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Container Size ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Container Sealing .................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 Internal Part Protection Required ...................................................................................................... 5 4.0 Pallet Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 5 5.0 Unitization and Palletization -
MIL-HDBK-1791.Pdf
●L ..?./-,,,? NOTE: MIL-STD-1791(USAF)has been redesignatedasa handbook,and is to be used for guidance purposes only. This document is no: longer to be cited as a requirement. For administrative expediency, the only physical chafige jom Ml L-STD-l 791 (USAF) is this cover -& .. page. However, this document is no longer to b%”’cited as a requirement. If cited as a requirement, contractors may disregard the requirements of this document and interpret its contents only as guidance. NOT MEASUREMENT SENSITIVE NliL-1-ii3BK-f 791 (USAF) 14 Februarv 1997 SUPERSEDING MlL-STD-l 791 (USAF) NOTICE 3 14 February 1997 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HANDBOOK DESIGNING FOR INTERNAL AERIAL DELlVERY IN FIXED WING AIRCRAFT THIS HANDBOOK IS FOR GUIDANCE ONLY DO NOT CITE THIS DOCUMENT AS A REQUIREMENT AMSC N/A FSC 1510 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A.” Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited, --- ,&- --- .. ~ ., MIL-STD-1791 (Usu) 31 October 1985 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 0’ Washington DC 2D350 -: DESIGNING FOR INTERNAL AERIAL DELIVERY IN FIXED WING AIRCRAFT MIL-STD-1791 (USAF) 1. This Military Standard is approved for use within the Department of the Air Force and is available for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense. 2’. Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any per- tinent data which may be of use in improving this document should be addressed to: ASD/ENES, Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-6503 by using the self-addressed Standardization Document Improvement Proposal (DD Form 1426) appearing at the end of this document or by letter. —. ,.b-- ii 9) MIL-STD-1791 (USAF) 31 October 1985 FOREWORD This standard establishes general design and performance requirements for military equipment to be air transported in or airdropped from the cargo compartments of fixed wing aircraft. -
Introduction to Corrugated Boxes
Introduction to Corrugated Boxes LASZLO HORVATH, PH.D., CPLP APRIL 23, 2020 ! Design Steps for Stacking Strength… "#$%&#%$'()*( "#$%&#%$'()*(( !"#$%&"' "+,-.'(/,+# /,+#(0)12 3 History of Corrugated Boards ! 1871 Albert Jones patented the first idea of a fluted paper ! 1874 Oliver Long suggested the creation of the single face board ! Late 1870, Machinery was developed to make corrugated board ! 1890 Another liner was added which resulted the first single wall corrugated board 4 Corrugated Board Basics 0+,'$5)1$2 Components: ! Linerboard ! Corrugating Medium ! Adhesive ! Linerboard and medium are characterized using Basis Weight 6)$$%-1#+,-(7'2+%8 Grades 92:';+<' ! Basis Weight: Weight of the board in lbs per 1000 sq. ft. = Corrugated Board Basics ! Most common medium is the 26 lbs / 1000 sq./ft. ! Basis weight grade specified board is characterized by weight and Mullen burst strength. Linerboard Grades (lbs. /1000ft2) Corrugating Medium Grades (lbs. /1000ft2) Basis Weight Burst Strength Grades (Psi) 23 26 70 26 (most common) 33 85 30 38 92 33 42 100 36 69 135 40 90 160 > Corrugated Board Basics ! Corrugated Board Types ! Corrugated Flute Types 4?!@(+,A !"#$%"&&"! !?B +,A >?43(+,A !?!@(+,A !?43(+,A @ Corrugated Board Basics Characteristics A-flute C-flute B-flute E-flute Stack Strength Best Good Fair Poor Printing Poor Fair Good Best Die Cutting Poor Fair Good Best Puncture Good Best Fair Poor Storage Space Most Fair Good Least Score/Bend Poor Fair Good Best Cushioning Best Good Fair Poor Flat Crush Poor Fair Good Good C Corrugated Board Basics ! Double wall corrugated ! Provides extra strength to the box ! Allows the utilization of the advantages of multiple board types ! BC or AB-flute board: ! B-flute side prints better ! A or C-flute side strengthens B Corrugated Board Basics ! The Corrugated Board Grade identifies the liner and medium combination. -
North American Packaging Standards and Identification Requirements for Production Parts
NORTH AMERICAN PACKAGING STANDARDS AND IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCTION PARTS Control Number: 101-9999-P010 Document Date: 11-16-2017 Revision: C.11162017 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. ACCEPTABLE SHIPPING CONTAINERS ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2. EFFICIENT PACKAGING ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.3. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION REGULATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.4. EXPENDABLE PACKAGING ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... -
Normal Operations Monitoring
Normal Operations Monitoring A New Approach to Measuring and Managing Human and Safety Performance Tested in Aviation Ground Handling Louise Raggett A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Aviation University of New South Wales September 2016 1 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Raggett First name: Louise Other name/s: Claire Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: AVIAAR1900 -Aviation, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) School: Aviation Faculty: Science Title: Normal Operations Monitoring - A new approach to measuring and monitoring human and safety performance - tested in aviation ground operations Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) Unlike flight operations, which is now regarded as an 'Ultra-safe system' (Amalberti 2001, p. 109) aviation ground safety has languished behind the rest of the industry (Verschoor and Young 2011), with activities on the ramp now accounting for more than a quarter of all incidents (Balk and Bossenbroek 2010). In recent years, both 'damage to aircraft and harm to ground personnel have escalated' (Passenier 2015 p. 38) costing air carriers more than USD10 billion annually (GAO 2007) Models and measures influential to aviation safety are reviewed for their possible contribution to the ground safety problem. The Threat and Error Management Model (TEM) and line Operation Safety Audit (LOSA) method (Klinect, Murray, Merritt and Helmreich 2003) were identified as potential candidates and critically examined for their suitability. The aim of the current research was to develop an approach that builds on the existing benefits of LOSA, whilst incorporating contemporary theories of safety science, and improving data reliability and validity where possible. -
Supplier Packaging Manual North America
Supplier Packaging Manual North America This publication applies to all AGCO suppliers (domestic or international) who ship to AGCO sites located in North America UPDATED: September 2019 Table of Contents 1 General..............................................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Packaging Manual purpose……..............................................................................................................3 2 Package Type...................................................................................................................................................3 2.1 Selection of Package Type......................................................................................................................3 2.2 Package Type for Manufacturing “Production Parts”...............................................................................3 2.3 Package Type for “Service Parts”............................................................................................................3 3 General Packaging Requirements..................................................................................................................4 3.1 Basic Protection Requirements.................................................................................................................4 3.1.1 Shock & Vibration.............................................................................................................................4 3.1.2 -
Unitizing Goods on Pallets and Slipsheets
United States Department of Agriculture Unitizing Goods on Forest Service Forest Pallets and Products Laboratory General Slipsheets Technical Report FPL-GTR-52 Abstract Acknowledgments Packaging, handling, and shipping methods and facilities The figures in this manual are adapted from a variety of have changed drastically since World War II. Today, most sources. They are as follows: products are individually packaged and then combined into unitized loads for more efficient handling, storage, and Figure shipping. The purpose of this manual is to promote the most number Based on information provided by: effective use of wood and wood fiber in current packaging 1 Forest Products Laboratory and shipping practices by providing a basic understanding of 2 A-B-C Packaging Machine Corporation the many factors involved in selecting an optimal method of 3-7 Material Handling Engineering Magazine unitizing goods on pallets and slipsheets. The manual also 8 Signode Corporation provides a valuable place of reference for the numerous 9 Mobile Chemical Company standards and specifications relating to unitizing loads. 10 Lantech Incorporated 11 CTX Products Company Keywords: Unitizing, palletizing, pallets, slipsheets, 12-13 Gloucester Engineering Company strapping, shrinkwrap, stretchwrap, netwrap, adhesives, hot 14-15 Radiant Engineering Company melts, material handling, packaging. 16-17 CTX Products Company 18 Malow Corporation and Trident Manufacturing Company 19 Presto Products Incorporated 20 MIMA Corporation 21 Lantech Corporation 22 Aktron Corporation 23-24 Bemis Company and Conwed Company 25-34 National Wood Pallet & Container Association, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, and Forest Products Laboratory 35 Inca Presswood Pallets Limited 36 Elberta Crate & Box Co. 37 Menasha Corporation 38 St. -
Guide to Packaging Freight Shipments Iopp Transport Packaging Committee
Guide to Packaging Freight Shipments IoPP Transport Packaging Committee 1 Guide to Packaging Freight Shipments (IoPP Transport Packaging Committee Final — 11/27/07 (updated 8/4/14)) Scope These guidelines are voluntary and intended to assist in designing packages and other shipping units weighing 1 51 pounds or greater, that will perform satisfactorily as single entities in a domestic or international freight carrier environment. These guidelines are not to be considered approved carrier packaging specifications. Following part or all of these guidelines will not guarantee the automatic approval of a damage claim by any carrier. Terminology The following terms are specific to this guide: Performance-based: Design criteria focused on achieving a satisfactory performance to specified elements, such as degree of hazard. Shipping Unit: The complete unit that will be subjected to the distribution environment, for example a crate, box, bag, pallet, or bundle capable of movement by mechanical handling equipment. Single Package: A single shipping container, including any interior protective packaging, which provides a means of protecting and handling a product. Freight Carriers: Distribution carriers that utilize air, ocean or land to transport shipments weighing over 1 50 pounds or shipments that are unitized or palletized. Freight Shipment: A shipment tendered to a freight carrier Oversize Shipment: A shipping unit exceeding the carrier's size or weight requirements. Transport Package: A shipping unit that provides containment and protection to goods during handling, storage, and transportation. The term includes all industrial packaging and the shipping containers for consumer products. Significance and Use This guide addresses the transportation environment, which includes manual handling and the use of mechanical handling equipment. -
TMNA Packaging Workshop
Packaging Workshop February 4, 2020 / TMMTX Property of ORBIS Corporation | www.orbiscorporation.com Packaging Overview • Packaging Overview – Container selection factors – QPC optimization within target container – Parts that require custom dunnage BC 2 Property of ORBIS Corporation | www.orbiscorporation.com StakPak® System • 4 Generations in the family of StakPak® containers • 27 models / sizes • Weight capacity up to 40lbs. • Smooth internal walls for ORBIShield dunnage installation • Containers cube out standard AIAG pallets • Material: HDPE – ESD / FR / Micro Fine Cell • Manufacturing locations • Urbana, OH • Silao, Mexico • Osage City, KS 3 Property of ORBIS Corporation | www.orbiscorporation.com StakPak Systems 4 Property of ORBIS Corporation | www.orbiscorporation.com Benefits of StakPak Containers • Ergonomics/Safety • Eliminates corrugated – Sprains, strains, lacerations packaging costs • Legislation on recycling and – corrugated setup costs recyclable materials – disposal of corrugated or expendables – reduces logistics costs – packaging quality 5 Property of ORBIS Corporation | www.orbiscorporation.com StakPak Features • Drain holes in bumper and handles – prevent water from collecting in pocket areas and in bumper – allows container to dry faster after washing – saves water in washers that recycle the water • Continuous bumper – keeps dust and dirt from contaminating product inside – acts as lid for container below 6 Property of ORBIS Corporation | www.orbiscorporation.com StakPak Features (cont.) • Detached Lids • Attached -
IMO/ILO/UNECE CTU Code
IMO/ILO/UNECE Code of Practice for Packing of Cargo Transport Units (CTU Code) 2014 Table of contents Chapter 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2. Definitions ....................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 3. Key requirements ............................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 4. Chains of responsibility and information .......................................................................11 Chapter 5. General transport conditions .........................................................................................15 Chapter 6. CTU properties ..............................................................................................................17 Chapter 7. CTU suitability ...............................................................................................................22 Chapter 8. Arrival, checking and positioning of CTUs ....................................................................25 Chapter 9. Packing cargo into CTUs ..............................................................................................30 Chapter 10. Additional advice on the packing of dangerous goods .................................................32 Chapter 11. On completion of packing .............................................................................................35