New England Journal of Public Policy Volume 17 | Issue 1 Article 11 9-21-2001 How Hollywood Films Portray Illness Robert A. Clark Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp Part of the Film and Media Studies Commons, and the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Robert A. (2001) "How Hollywood Films Portray Illness," New England Journal of Public Policy: Vol. 17: Iss. 1, Article 11. Available at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/nejpp/vol17/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in New England Journal of Public Policy by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. How Hollywood Films Portray Illness Robert A. Clark, M.D. Part I: Oncology Art imitates life, we are often told. Occasionally we also observe that life imitates art. Hollywood movies may fulfill the definition of art in both these adages. Movies evoke our fantasies, fears, loves, and hates and therefore reflect our lives. The art of film, however, diverges from real life because of the necessities of good story- telling: dramatization, plot lines, character development, and romanticism. There- fore, films are often imperfect reflections of our lives. As F. Scott Fitzgerald said, “There are no second acts in life.” Movies have been blamed for creating disturbing or profane cultural images, leading to societal ills such as violence, sexual deviancy, and isolation. Whether art imitates life or the reverse, it may be instructive to study how movies depict medi- cal themes, especially oncology, in order to understand how cancer and medicine are perceived in popular culture.