Ecocriticism, Textual Criticism, and William Bartram's Travels
Text and Trail: Ecocriticism, Textual Criticism, and William Bartram’s Travels Mark Sturges Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, Volume 14, Number 1, 2012, pp. 1-20 (Article) Published by Penn State University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/467954 [ This content has been declared free to read by the pubisher during the COVID-19 pandemic. ] • Text and Trail: Ecocriticism, Textual Criticism, and William Bartram’s Travels mark sturges Long ago, Cheryll Glotfelty defined ecocriticism as “the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment” (xviii). Ecocriticism, she wrote, emphasizes “relationships between things . between human culture and the physical world” (xx). In recent years, Glen Love has promoted a more practical ecocriticism, which he describes as “a discourse that aims to test its ideas against the workings of physical real- ity” (7). Today, this faith in the physical world continues to fuel ecocriti- cal scholarship, inspiring the same old song: we need a more empirical methodology, a new interdisciplinary approach. As a result, ecocritics often retreat into the refuge of science, a discipline that digs down to the bed- rock, embraces the natural facts, and promises the catharsis of contact. In this article, I’d like to suggest that an empirical methodology has long been within reach of literary critics. We don’t need to walk across campus to find it. It often lives right at home in our English departments, holed up in an archive, or secluded in a basement office. It goes by many names—textual editing, book history, bibliography, textual criticism—and it conducts some practical fieldwork of its own, collecting data, checking facts, and going to the source of literary production.
[Show full text]