Effect of Minimum-Wage Determinations in Oregon
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS ROYAL MEEKER, Commissioner BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES) . (WHOLE 1 H(2 BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS): ( NUMBER 1 / 0 WOMEN IN INDUSTRY SERIES: No. 6 EFFECT OF MINIMUM-WAGE DETERMINATIONS IN OREGON / 9 \ JULY, 1915 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis CONTENTS. Page. Introduction and summary............................................................................ 5-10 Establishments covered and numbers employed in 1914.................................. 10 Numbers employed before and after minimum-wage determinations............... 11-17 Changes in numbers employed compared with amount of sales................. 11-13 Changes in numbers of girls, inexperienced women, and experienced women employed................................................................................. 13-17 Rates of pay before and after minimum-wage determinations.......................... 17-23 All female employees.............................................................................. 17-19 Girls under 18 years of age....................................................................... 19,20 Inexperienced adult women 18 years of age and over............................... 20-22 Experienced adult women 18 years of age and over.................................. 22,23 Average weekly earnings before and after minimum-wage determinations........ 24-28 Selling efficiency before and after minimum-wage determinations.................. 28-31 Labor cost before and after minimum-wage determinations............................. 32,33 Portland department, dry-goods, and 5 and 10 cent stores...............................34-56 Numbers employed before and after minimum-wage determinations....... 34-44 Rates of pay before and after minimum-wage determinations................... 44-51 Average weekly earnings before and after minimum-wage determinations.. 52-54 Labor cost before and after minimum-wage determinations..................... 54-56 Summary of changes................................................................................ 56 Portland specialty stores................................................................................ 57-61 Numbers employed before and after minimum-wage determinations........ 57,58 Rates of pay before and after minimum-wage determinations.................... 58,59 Average weekly earnings before and after minimum-wage determinations.. 60,61 Portland neighborhood stores......................................................................... 61,62 Employment of women before and after minimum-wage determinations.. 61,62 Salem stores.................................................................................................. 62-67 Numbers employed before and after minimum-wage determinations....... 62-64 Rates of pay before and after minimum-wage determinations.................. 64,65 Average weekly earnings before and after minimum-wage determinations.. 66 Labor cost before and after minimum-wage determinations....................... 67 Changes in rates of pay, occupation, and place of employment since minimum- wage determinations, as reported by women personally interviewed............... 68-75 Table I.—Changes in the industrial status of women employed in Portland and Salem department and other retail stores since the minimum-wage de terminations went into effect......................................................................76-99 Table II.—Women who were not employed in October, 1914, but who had been employed prior to the time the minimum-wage determinations went Appendix A.—Act creating Industrial Welfare Commission of Oregon..........103-106 Appendix B.—Determinations of Industrial Welfare Commission of Oregon... 107,108 3 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis BULLETIN OF THE U. S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. WHOLE NO. 176. WASHINGTON. JULY, 1915. EFFECT OF MINIiHUM-WAGE DETERMINATIONS IN OREGON.’ BY MARIE L. OBENAUER AND BERTHA VON DER NIENBURG. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY. Does the establishment of a legal minimum wage for women do more harm than good to the women it is designed to assist ? Does it lead to their displacement by men, or is the child, in spite of the pressure used to keep it out of industry, being drawn in to do the unskilled work that the adult woman had been employed to do? If any women are benefited, how many and to what extent? Are the higher wages paid to the efficient women being leveled to meet the additional expense imposed in raising the wage of the less skilled? Does the assurance of a legal minimum wage reduce woman’s efficiency? Finally, is labor cost increased by such legis lation ? Such are the insistent queries asked by the American public as to the value of legal enactments in insuring a living wage to normal wage-earning women. To answer these questions upon the basis of experience in America has been the object of this study. The field in which answers were to be found in the fall of 1914, when this investigation was begun, was very limited. Only the commissions in Oregon, Washington, and Massachusetts had made wage determinations.2 In Massachusetts the determinations made applied only to the brush industry, and like those in Washington, were of too recent date to permit of the necessary business adjust ments or to allow a study of conditions in corresponding normal months before and after the determinations.3 Utah alone among the States has a minimum fixed for all occupations in all industries by statutory law. Although the date of enactment would have made possible an investigation, women affected in this State were so few in number and so scattered as to render the study inadvisable. i The material forming the basis of this report was collected at the joint expense of the United States Bureau of Labor* Statistics and the United States Commission on Industrial Relations. * See Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 167, for summaries and the text of American minimum-wage determinations. * The Massachusetts determination became operative Aug. 15, 1914; the Washington determinations became operative at different dates from June 27,1914, to Feb. 20,1915. Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 6 BULLETIN OF THE BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. Oregon was, therefore, the only State that could throw light on all the queries asked.1 Yet even here, it was necessary to confine the study to the retail stores—the industry employing the largest number of women to which the determinations are applicable. When this investigation was inaugurated the determinations made by the Oregon Industrial Welfare Commission in regard to factory employees applied only to time workers, all piecework being beyond the scope of the determinations made up to that time. As the commission was contemplating orders covering piece rates, a study of the effect of the minimum wage in factories would have been of little practical value. The Oregon commission in fixing the minimum wage of women employed in stores made one set of determinations for the city of Portland and another for all other cities, towns, or villages. Port land has a population somewhat in excess of 200,000. The next largest city, Salem, with approximately 14,000 people, presents the retail-store conditions which prevail in the other small cities in the State, depending largely on the surrounding country for their trade. The determinations in Oregon classify female employees in retail stores as girls under 18 years,2 inexperienced adult women 18 years of age and over with experience of not more than one year in an occupation, and experienced adult women 18 years of age and over having more than one year of experience in an occupation. Any change in the character of service rendered constitutes a change in occupation, and therefore the beginning of a new apprenticeship year. All girls under 18 and inexperienced adult women in retail stores in the State of Oregon must receive a minimum weekly rate of pay of $6; all experienced adult women must receive $8.25, save in Portland, where they must be paid at the minimum rate of $9.25 per week. These awards became operative on different dates, from October 4, 1913, to February 7, 1914.8 To ascertain what the effect of the Oregon determinations had been, a comparison was made of records of 40 department, dry-goods, 5 and 10 cent, specialty, and neighborhood stores for the two spring months, March and April, in 1913 and the same two months in 19144— periods ending five months before and beginning five months after the date on which the first minimum-wage determination went into 1 See appendixes, for law creating Oregon Industrial Welfare Commission and for wage determinations. 2 Although the commission had the right to include boys under 18 in the determinations, they had not done so at the time of this investigation. * The exact dates on which the determinations applicable to women employed in stores became effective were as follows: Oct. 4,1913, for girls between Id and 18 years, a minimum wage of $1 a day. Nov. 23,1913, for experienced adult women in Portland, a minimum rate of $9.25 a week. Feb. 7,1914, for experienced adult women in the State outside of Portland,