Tel Aviv: from Patrick Geddes' Utopian Social City to the International City of Late Capital Ism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ACSA EUROPEAN CONFERENCE LISBON GEOGRAPHY OF POWER 1995 107 Tel Aviv: From Patrick Geddes' Utopian Social City to the International City of Late Capital ism HORACIO SCHWARTZ Technion/lsrael Institute of Technology Israel In contemporary society - according to Dennis Potter's While this area was absorbed by the expanding cornrner- dictum - citizens have been transformed into consumers. The cia1 downtown and its fimctions and texture radically changed, shift in social power behind this process is mirrored in the Neve Tzedek, after a long period of social and physical changing shape ofthe city. Tel Aviv, founded just eighty five decay, is undergoing a process of renewal through years ago, is an extreme example of the interaction between gentrification. urban conceptions and configurations and dominant social forces. UTOPIA NOW: GEDDES' MASTER PLAN OF 1925 By means of a schematic section through the history ofthe When Scotsman Patrick Geddes, "social evolutionist and city, this paper attempts an assessment of the role of those city planner," was invited to formulate a Master Plan for Tel forces and conceptions - or their absence - in determining the Aviv, "the idea of community building had been verywhere nature and scope of the present transformations of the urban in the air" - in Ebenezer Howard's words; having pioneered fabric. a "sociological approach to the study of urbanizationWand Tel-Aviv is an assemblage ofpast and recent urban utopias, having laid down the groundwork for a new understanding constrained by conditions, scaled down and transformed, but of the city- region relationship, Geddes' philosophy had still identifiable and influential. Partly "collision city" and influenced the very concept and scope of planning through partly "collage city" in Colin Rowe's terms its growth, - - the "idea that social processes and spatial form are intimately while chronologically continuous, resulted in a fragmented related." Geddes' report is pemeated by his anarchist pattern; each district reflecting the urban ideals and historical worldview and commitment to the garden city idea, but also conditions under which it came into being. Four determinant by the realization that the layout schemes of previous garden stages can be detected in the ascent of the city. cities could not be applied to an existing and expanding major urban environment. His proposal was an hierarchical THE FIRST SUBURBS system of main streets ("mainways") which defined large Neve Zedek, the Hipodamic Grid urban blocks ("home blocks"), structured by narrow residen- Founded as Jewish cooperative in 1887 with an orthogonal tial streets ("homeways") which, together with pedestrian disposition of streets, 6 meters wide, and houses built as a lanes, led to a public park or enclosed avenue at the core of continuous mass on the street line. No hierarchy existed, the "home block," with "playgrounds, tennis courts, rich except for the allocation of larger plots at the edges. It was gardens and orchards." This was to be embodiment of the a blend of western influences in urban layout and local "Garden Village in the very heart of the city." Geddes architectural typologies. describes enthusiastically his vision of a "new type of civic grouping, at once more beautiful and more health giving than The Garden Suburb, Ahuzat Bait any previous form of large community in human annals" ... Its foundation in 1909, marks both the beginning of Tel Aviv "fruit emblazoned in purple and gold." as an autonomous urban entity and the first attempt of During the following decades, implementation of the plan implementation of the garden suburb concept. Based on an converged with the architectural utopian vision ofthe Modem orthogonal grid and a building code imposing recessed front Movement and produced a sui generis - perhaps unique - lines and limitations of hight and land coverage, leading to urban pattern: the "Bauhaus" district ofcenter-north Tel Aviv, detatched one or two leveled houses. Neoclassical in its a trove of thousands of modernistic buildings interspersed in architectural spirit, the main street led to the civic monument the Geddesian urban structure. A new society was the slogan of the time: the neighbourhood's high school, a landmark of that summerized the spirit of the times and the greater civic orientalistic architecture. interest was the main driving force behind urban formation. 108 ACSA EUROPEAN CONFERENCE LISBON GEOGRAPHY OF POWER 1995 Tel Aviv was and still is a predominantly a middle class provides a reductive solution to densification of housing city. Most of its land resources are privatly owned, in a areas in the inner city, erasing the existing fabric. While the pattern of small plots of about 5OOSqm each, thus generating interplay of corporate power and real estate speculation a spatial and social equilibrium evidenced in the urban shapes the urban skyline, social and geographical stratifica- morphology and the typical "Tel Aviv house," a three or four tion and urban decay follow, as inevitable counterparts. level apartment building on a discontinuous street facade, a Through the haphazard drive of market forces a different city contemporary version of the pavilion street. Workers hous- replaces the existing one going often against its grain and ing projects were built on state owned land, harmonically spirit. Conflict replaces concensus. It is significant that in the integrated in the mass and architectural character. "The last two decades few civic places have been created or white city" as poet Natan Alterman wrote about it. With the renovated by public initiative, since the public domain is first magor cultural complex, the Habima theater and Mann increasingly considered a by-product of commercial devel- auditorium, this period came to a climax and closure. opment; the aridity of some of the non-habitable spaces thus built, is a reflection at the semiotic level of their residual THE INSTITUTIONAL PERIOD nature, not focused on social interaction. The present predicament stems also from the receding From the fifties on, independence and institutionalization, role of urban design and the reluctancy of planning authori- led to organized and planned new social housing; ties to excercise their considerable statutory powers beyond neighbourhoods were laid out according to the established the task of moderators. Narrowing of the scope of urban canons of the European siedlung. While adressing the discourse has reduced it to the preservation against develop- quantitative parameters of mass housing, the fabric of the ment antithesis. Advocacy groups for the preservation of the city, as elsewhere, was disrupted; this approach reached its vast early 20th century and modem architectural heritage, peak during the seventies and the eighties in the new northern operate as the main alternative in the absence of an urban areas beyond the Yarkon river. The local version of the . policy that establishes qualitative goals, while urban design Corbusian "city oftowers" sprangup as paradoxically, a high as a means of acheiving them is conspicously missing. middle class, streetless motopia; this magor extention of the In 1995 the new modem- eclectic building of the Tel Aviv city, is not only devoid of the qualities of traditional urban opera house was inaugurated. environments, but lacking also in its quantitative param- eters: it is the least dense district in the city with the highest proportion of - mostly unused - open spaces. State power, EPILOGUE being the dominant social force, guided and informed urban While the first neigbourhoods were the result of democratic planning. Massive institutional building reached its peak urbanism, implemented by citizens and cooperatives, almost with the Tel Aviv University campus, yet another reflection without mediation, Geddes' plan and more so the northem of the isolated "building in the park" concept. district implied adelegation of power to the planner or the planning authority as trustee of the common interest. C.B.D. THE CITY OF THE CORPORATION Geddes' vision, although centered in the environmental AND THE CONSUMER qualities of dwelling, permitted the integration of emerging In the late sixties, the first high school, by then a civic interests and activities without disruption, in spite of a symbol, was demolished and replaced by the first high rise population increase well beyond the original forecast. ofice building, signaling the emergence of private enter- Although not a multi layered historical city, Tel Aviv - the prise as the dominant force in the social and physical map of imprint of the aspirations that formed and sustained it. In any the city. From than on architectural programs and typologies urban environment, rediscovery and renewal of its specific follow the transformation of Tel Aviv into a major financial ethos should be the foundation of planning policy, mani- business and production center and the hub of the metropoli- fested in the constant recreation and enrichment of the web tan area of nearly two million mhabitants. This radical of public places, which is the raison d'etre of urban culture: change in the structure of power and gradual integration of therefore the task of urban design is to create the conditions Tel Aviv in the global network of multy national production for a democratic synthesis ofthe urban texture. In the present and marketing, demand a major transformation of the city. phase, the acsent of the post industrial city seems to be in This is happening at the expense of the civic dimension of