DOCSLIB.ORG

January 2018 Associates Perkins+Will

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
January 2018 Associates Perkins+Will Prepared for River City Company Chattanooga Area Regional Transit Authority/ Chattanooga Parking Authority by Stantec Nelson\Nygaard Consulting January 2018 Associates Perkins+Will i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Lead Agencies and Supporting Partners River City Company University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Kim White, President and CEO Dr. Steven Angle, Chancellor Jim Williamson, Vice President of Planning and Development Dr. Richard Brown, Executive Vice Chancellor Amy Donahue, Director of Marketing and Communication Tyler Forrest, Associate Vice Chancellor for Budget and Finance Ann Yoachim, Director of Community Partnerships Chattanooga Area Regional Transportation Authority/Chattanooga Parking Authority Erlanger Health System Lisa Maragnano, Executive Director Kevin Spiegel, President and CEO Brent Matthews, Director of Parking Britt Tabor, Executive Vice President and CFO Philip Pugliese, Transportation System Planner Bruce Komiske, Vice President Mickey Milita, Director of Guest Services and Parking Lyndhurst Foundation Macon Toledano, Associate Director Siskin Hospital for Physical Rehabilitation Carol Sim, President and CEO Benwood Foundation Jim Deraney, Assistant Vice President Jeff Pfitzer, Program Officer Public Agency Partners City of Chattanooga Yuen Lee, Research and Analysis Mayor Andy Berke Melissa Taylor, Strategic Long-Range Planning Stacy Richardson, Chief of Staff to Mayor Berke Blythe Bailey, Administrator, Department of Transportation Hamilton County Cary Bohannon, Department of Public Works Mayor Jim Coppinger Mike Compton, Chief of Staff Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Todd Leamon, Administrator of Public Works Agency Paul Parker, Real Property Manager John Bridger, Executive Director Kim McKinney, Geographic Information Systems Specialist Karen Hundt, Community Planning and Design Downtown Chattanooga Parking Study iii Study Stakeholders 3H Group, Hiren Desai Hennen’s, Tim Hennen Berry & Hunt, Steve Hunt Heritage Land, Will Yandell Bessie Smith Cultural Center, Dionne Jennings Hamilton County Health Department, Becky Barnes Blue Plate, Rob Gentry High Point Climbing and Fitness, John Wiygul and Johnny Bluff View Arts District, Angie Niemeyer O’Brien Camp House, Matt Busby Houston Museum of Decorative Arts, Mel Cooper Chattanooga Chamber of Commerce, Charles Wood Hunter Museum of American Art, Virginia Anne Sharber Chattanooga Choo-Choo, Adam Kinsey Kinsey Probasco Hayes, Adam Kinsey Chattanooga Convention Center , Mike Shuford Lamp Post Properties, Tiffanie Robinson Chattanooga Lookouts, Rich Mozingo McKibben Hotels, Daniel Mote Champy’s Chicken, Seth Champion Noon Development, Todd Phillips Creative Discovery Museum, Henry Schulson and Shannon Read House, Ken Merkel Johnson Republic Parking, Jack Skelton and Britton Stansell Defoor Brothers, Ken Defoor Riverfront Business Partners, Jerry Sterling The Enterprise Center, Ken Hayes, Ann Coulter, and Andrew Riverside Development, Chris Curtis and Betsy Ranalli Rodgers Russell Construction, David Smith Easy Bistro, Eric Niel Tennessee Aquarium, Keith Sanford EPB, David Wade and Hodgen Mainda Unum, Breege Ferrell and Richard Meadows Fidelity Trust Company, Matt McGaulley Vision Hospitality Group, Mitch Patel and Drew Hibbard Finley Stadium, Chris Thomas Warehouse Row, Jen Mingola Fletcher Bright, Fletcher Bright Consultant Team Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. Joel Mann, AICP, Project Manager Alyson Fletcher Ralph DeNisco, Principal-in-Charge Brynn Leopold Liza Cohen Perkins+Will Jessica Florez Blake Reeves iv Downtown Chattanooga Parking Study CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 OVERVIEW 7 3 KEY FINDINGS 15 4 GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS 33 Shared Parking 34 Performance-Based Parking System 35 Monitor, Report, Adjust 36 Reinvest Funds in Multimodal Improvements 37 Potential Transit Service Enhancements 38 Eliminate Time Limits on Paid Street Parking 42 Pursue Publicly Accessible Supply 43 Update Technology to Support Management Goals 44 Consistent Signage and Wayfinding 45 Curbside Management for Emerging Mobility 46 Event Management 47 5 DISTRICT-LEVEL PROFILES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49 City Center North 52 City Center South 62 Riverfront 70 Southside 78 Martin Luther King Corridor 88 UTC Campus Area 100 Health & Education District 108 Downtown Chattanooga Parking Study v 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WHY THIS STUDY? wide look at parking in over a decade, during which time major changes to downtown such as the relocation of Blue The Chattanooga Area Regional Transportation Authority/ Cross Blue Shield and the addition of new hotels, businesses Chattanooga Parking Authority (CARTA/CPA) and River and residents have changed downtown’s parking profile. City Company (River City), in partnership with the Lyndhurst and Benwood Foundations the University of Tennessee at OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY’S STEPS Chattanooga (UTC), Siskin Hospital, Erlanger Health System, and the City of Chattanooga (CDOT), commissioned this The study gathered information on the supply and use of comprehensive study of parking in central Chattanooga to greater downtown Chattanooga’s approximately 43,000 understand challenges and opportunities related to parking parking spaces, which included both on-street and off-street as the city’s urban core continues to grow and develop. It is spaces of both public and private access. In addition to intended to capture the current state of parking at a time counting and classifying spaces by their access and regulation, of ongoing change in downtown and to provide strategic the study also measured how much these spaces were used recommendations for addressing and balancing the current on a typical weekday and Saturday to understand normal parking needs of downtown’s diverse set of organizations, patterns of parking activity. businesses, and residents. The study is the first downtown- 2 Downtown Chattanooga Parking Study This is the most comprehensive such inventory of parking that has been developed for greater downtown Chattanooga and SUMMARY OF KEY served as the basis for recommendations and decision-making FINDINGS throughout the study. It also allows Chattanooga’s various civic organizations and public agencies to continue to update Less than one third of greater downtown’s this information in a consistent framework, thus allowing the parking spaces are publicly available. findings and recommendations of this study to be assessed as downtown grows. Certain parts of the study area, especially The study’s primary analysis compared information on UTC and Erlanger and Siskin hospitals, supply (the parking inventory), levels of use (parking expect to grow to levels that will exhaust utilization), and expected demand (a summary of current current parking supply if they current land uses and activities in the study area, considering both parking usage increases at the same rate. a present-day snapshot and future growth based on known development potential). This allowed the study team to This potential shortage on the east of understand true gaps in parking potential, looking beyond an the study area is mirrored by general individual parking facility but considering the needs of the availability in City Center and Riverfront. entire district. The study team augmented this information with local In the MLK district, a lack of publicly knowledge and insight gained from stakeholder discussions. available parking is already leading to parking shortage. On the Southside, FINDINGS: PARKING NEEDS AND OPPORTUNITIES residential streets face spillover demand Findings of this analysis guided the study’s recommendations, from a growing commercial district. which are based on the principle that Chattanooga has numerous opportunities to better define and execute While the study suggests that downtown management strategies, even though adding to parking Chattanooga does not currently face a inventory is a worthwhile strategic investment in key areas. critical, district-wide shortage of parking overall, supply and demand dynamics are In general, the study observed that current parking use tends to be less than what would be expected given the uneven, and some specific areas currently type and amount of land uses in the whole of greater face parking challenges and feature parking downtown Chattanooga, but as much as would be expected, facilities that are fully used at peak times. if not slightly more, in select areas such as the Health & Ed district and UTC campus area. In addition, even when supply There is room for efficiency through is constrained on weekdays, it is much less heavily used on different pricing and management techniques, especially adjusting on-street pricing and the times of day that regulations are in effect. Downtown Chattanooga Parking Study 3 weekends, further suggesting that major additions to parking meters and time limits are in effect. This recognizes that the supply might have limited utility. most valuable parking spaces in downtown—those spaces on street and in surface lots convenient to businesses and However, even in areas with constrained supply today, downtown attractions—should be priced accordingly in order the cost of new parking construction and uncertainty to provide availability for customers who want to access them. about its long-term use have led major users of parking to explore other arrangements than building new supply. Set price to create availability. In general, the study has The study recommends strategies to capture these kinds recommended that price is the most effective
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Student INSIDE Echo Awards: a Must Read P.3 Ervin on Suttles P
    "Let one hundred flowers blossom; let one hundred schools of thought contend." The Student INSIDE Echo Awards: A Must Read P.3 Ervin On Suttles P. 7 Birthday Party P.9 Shorts On Sports P. 13 Volume 82/ Issue 26 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga April 14, 1989 AN ESSAY Obear: New Phone System Next Fall vendors. After all the quotes are returned, By Brian Hicks administration and faculty ("the business A View on Pro- a final decision will be made. end of the campus," Obear said), and one The Student Echo i-r/"> Obear said replacing the phone system for the residents. But Obear said that was Students and faculty returning to UTC is no longer an option, it is a necessity. just one option, and still just one idea. Choice Rally next fall will find a new phone system in He said Solid State Systems, the current place, Chancellor Frederick Obear said Obear said several options for the system's service company, has informed Wednesday. system are being looked at, but cost administration that "sometime in 1990, In an interview Wednesday night with restrictions will have the final say in any By Angela F. Hawk parts for (UTC's) system will no longer be The Echo, the Chancellor said a decision extras a new system may carry. However, Special to Ihe Echo available." has been made to implement a new Obear stressed that no matter what the On Sunday, April 9, 1989, I was initiated phone system over the summer. "We've got to make a change," Obear new phone system will consist of, at least into a world of national social consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Planners As Supporters and Enablers of Diasporic Placemaking
    PLANNERS AS SUPPORTERS AND ENABLERS OF DIASPORIC PLACEMAKING: LESSONS FROM CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Courtney Elizabeth Knapp August 2014 Copyright ©2014 Courtney Elizabeth Knapp ABSTRACT Planners as Supporters and Enablers of Diasporic Placemaking: Lessons from Chattanooga, Tennessee Courtney Elizabeth Knapp, Ph.D. Cornell University 2014 Professional urban planners have long struggled with questions about how to better support the planning and development of socially equitable and racially just communities. This dissertation project expands this conversation by exploring three centuries of ‘diasporic placemaking’ in the southeastern U.S. city of Chattanooga, Tennessee. I define ‘diasporic placemaking’ as creative, everyday practices through which historically uprooted and migratory populations create communities of material security and cultural belonging from shared social and physical environments. From there, I ask how planners might come to better support and enable multiracial diasporic placemaking in Chattanooga and other complex, racially and culturally diverse cities. The project builds upon literature in citizen participation, planning education, placemaking, theories of diaspora, cultural studies, and participatory action research. Methodologically, it combined ethnographic techniques (narrative interviews, participant observation, and archival analysis) with an action research partnership between the author, Chattanooga Organized for Action and the Chattanooga Public Library. Together, we launched two experimental initiatives: the Sustaining People and Reclaiming Communities (SPARC) Initiative and the Planning Free School of Chattanooga. Both were designed to be alternatives to mainstream planning initiatives underway in Chattanooga and to be created with and for the benefit of low income residents, especially communities of color.
    [Show full text]
  • Download UTC Magazine in PDF Format
    FACT EDITION Surprising facts about UTC and its people 2 | The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Magazine University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Magazine volume two, issue three | Summer 2019 utc.edu/magazine 4 Message from the Chancellor EDITOR George Heddleston Getting Business-World Ready at Unum 6 Vice Chancellor, 8 WUTC Turns 40 Communications and Marketing 11 One-of-a-Kind Emergency Management Executive CREATIVE DIRECTOR 14 Virtually Blind, But Undaunted Stephen Rumbaugh 16 Engel Stadium’s “Take Me Out to the Ball Game” History ART DIRECTOR 18 Alumnus Steps Away from Divinity College He Founded Lynn Newton 20 Music as Therapy WRITERS 22 Engineer, Inventor, Entrepreneur Sarah Joyner Shawn Ryan 24 Athletics Megan Shadrick 25 Bookshelf Gina Stafford 26 Alum Notes CONTRIBUTING WRITER 27 Noteworthy Chuck Wasserstrom 28 Notabilis PHOTOGRAPHER Angela Foster We welcome your feedback: [email protected] VIDEOGRAPHY Mike Andrews Jacob Cagle The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga is a comprehensive, community-engaged campus of the University of Tennessee System. The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga is an equal employment WEB opportunity/affirmative action/Title VI/Title IX/Section 504/ADA/ADEA institution. Chris Gilligan ABOUT THE COVER From UTC’s “did you know” category, legend has it that if you step on one of the four, smooth-faced seals of Heritage Plaza as a student, you are doomed to fail your next exam, class or even wash out of college altogether. Even though it might just be a campus myth, Mocs are not willing to tempt fate. In fact, during the plaza’s busiest foot-traffic, you can see students part like the red sea, veering right or left, careful not to step on the seals which represent the schools that partnered to form the UTC of today.
    [Show full text]
  • OCT 1 6 2009 National Park Service
    [Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024- 0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior OCT 1 6 2009 National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form , ! This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information re­ quested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property ___________________________________________________________ historic name Engel Stadium other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number O'Neal Street and East Third Street N/Ad not for publication city or town Chattanooga NMQ vicinity state Tennessee code TN county Hamilton code 065 zip code 37403 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ^ nomination I I request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set for in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the proper­ ty ^ meets [H does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant EH nationally [U statewide E^l locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of the WELL Building Standard to Historic Engel Stadium
    University of Tennessee at Chattanooga UTC Scholar Student Research, Creative Works, and Honors Theses Publications 5-2021 Design during a pandemic: application of the WELL Building Standard to historic Engel Stadium Laurel Getty University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.utc.edu/honors-theses Part of the Interior Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Getty, Laurel, "Design during a pandemic: application of the WELL Building Standard to historic Engel Stadium" (2021). Honors Theses. This Theses is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research, Creative Works, and Publications at UTC Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UTC Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Design During a Pandemic: Application of the WELL Building Standard to Historic Engel Stadium Laurel Getty Departmental Honors Thesis The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Department of Interior Architecture and Design Examination Date: March 26, 2021 Jessica Etheredge Tonya Miller Associate Professor of Interior Architecture Assistant Professor of Interior Architecture Thesis Director Thesis Director Sarah Hamilton Adjunct Professor of Interior Architecture Department Examiner Table of Contents I. Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………….1 II. Chapter 1: Introduction ……………………………………………………………….2 a. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………….2 b. Purpose ……………………………………………………………………………5 c. Background ……………………………………………………………………….6 i. Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings ……………………………………6 ii. WELL Certification ………………………………………………………6 iii. IWBI COVID-19 Task Force …………………………………………….7 iv. Existing Building: Engel Stadium ………………………………………..7 v. Proposed Engel Concourse ……………………………………………….8 d. Significance………………………………………………………………………..9 e. Problem Statement ………………………………………………………………..9 f. Research Questions ……………………………………………………………...11 g. Assumptions of Study …………………………………………………………...11 h. Limitations of Study …………………………………………………………….11 i.
    [Show full text]
  • Chattanooga Math Trail: Community Mathematics Modules, Volume 1
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 478 915 SE 068 277 AUTHOR McAllister, Deborah A.; Mealer, Adrian; Moyer, Peggy S.; McDonald, Shirley A.; Peoples, John B. TITLE Chattanooga Math Trail: Community Mathematics Modules, Volume 1 PUB DATE 2003-00-00 NOTE 181p.; Supported by Tennesee University. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Community Education; *Mathematics Activities; Middle Schools; Secondary Education; Standards; Student Interests; *Student Motivation ABSTRACT This collection of community mathematics modules, or "math trail", is appropriate for middle grades and high school students (grades 5- 12). Collectively, the modules pay attention to all 10 of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) standards which include five content standards (Number and Operations, Algebra, Geometry, Measurement, Data Analysis, and Probability), and five process standards (Problem Solving, Reasoning and Proof, Communication, Connections, and Representation). Activities include: (1) "The Carousel at Coolidge Park"; (2) "Utilizing Government Regulation Measurements to Demonstrate Algebraic Application"; (3) "A Local Paper Manufacturer's Wood Yard";(4) "Algebra Is Everywhere-Engel Stadium";(5) "Bridges of Chattanooga"; (6) "Buckner-Rush Funeral Home-Dying to Do Math"; (7) "Challenger Center-Our Mission to Mars";(8) "Chattanooga Ducks"; (9) "Chattanooga Riverwalk";(10) "Coolidge Park";(11) "Ducks Unlimited Conservation Benefit at Mary McGuire's Restaurant";(12) "Fall Creek Falls State Resort Park";(13)
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HANDBOOK Updated 8/3/2018
    INTERNATIONAL STUDENT HANDBOOK Updated 8/3/2018 The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga INTERNATIONAL STUDENT AND SCHOLAR SERVICES International Student and Scholar Services utc.edu/isss [email protected] 423-425-4735 Hooper Hall 203 615 McCallie Avenue, Dept. 1751 Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403 USA UTC is a comprehensive, community-engaged campus of the University of Tennessee System. UTC is an EEO/AA/Titles VI & IX/Section 504/ADA/ADEA institution. E045710001-001-19 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 HEALTH, SAFETY AND THINGS TO DO AT UTC...12 Introduction to ISSS...1 SECURITY...9 Campus Rec/ARC...12 UTC Police...9 UTC Outdoors...12 INTERNATIONAL STUDENT UTC Alerts...9 UTC Fine Arts Center...12 AND SCHOLAR SERVICES...1 Medical Care and Insurance...9 UTC Athletics...13 Office Contact Information...1 Other Organizations...13 ISSS Services...2 HEALTH SERVICES...10 Get Involved in ISSS...3 University Health Services...10 BANKING...14 After-Hours Emergencies...10 Banking Options...14 UTC AND CHATTANOOGA...4 Pharmacies...10 About Chattanooga...4 U.S. CULTURE...14 Life at UTC...4 ACADEMICS...11 UTC ID...4 Policies...11 ISSS STAFF...16 Mocs Card...4 Plagiarism...11 Staff Contact Information...16 UTC Housing...5 Course Catalog...11 CAMPUS MAP...24 UTC SERVICES...6 LOCAL ATTRACTIONS...11 Technology Services...6 Mail Services...6 TRANSPORTATION...11 Counseling Services...7 Bike Chattanooga...11 Disability Services...7 CARTA Bus...11 UTC Library...7 UTC University Center (UC)...8 Other Campus Resources...8 BLUE HOLE INTRODUCTION CONTACT ISSS Thank you for taking time to review the Handbook for International MAILING INFO Students and Scholars at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Tells Why Incidents Not Reported Candidate for 30Th District Addresses
    UTC communication professor Dr. Melissa Hefferlin, a UTC art student, The Moccasin football team claimed Joseph Trahan is also a major in the talks about the experiences she its Fust home victory over the UT- Army reserves. He was recently sent to encountered while studying art in the Martin Pacers Saturday at Chamberlain Miami to aid in the Hurricane Andrew Soviet Union. Hefferlin is only the Field. The Mocs will enjoy a week off recovery effort with the Presidential | second American to attend the before hosting Central Arkansas next Task Force. For story, see A 2. academy. For story, see B4 week. For story, see CI. THE STUDENT ECHO Volume 87/Issue No. 4 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga September 17,1992 Survey Tells Why Incidents Not Reported Council Majority of sexual harassment incidents on campus are handled by victims To Make By Kim M. Johnson • Avoid harasser — 57.5% • Did not feel the university could or would Echo Managing Editor • Report incident to parents — 34.5% help —34.5% • Confront harasser — 31.0% • Were concerned about anonymity—34.5% Fortwood In this week's installment of the sexual • Tell another faculty member — 19.5% • Were concerned about retaliation—34.5% harassment series, the Echo would like to fur­ • Complain to University official — 9.2% • Were concerned they would not be believed Decision ther examine the finding of the recenUy re­ • Tell a councilor or their RA — 5.7% — 24.1% leased Sexual Harassment Survey. The report also questions the students why • Unwilling to discuss member of opposite Tuesday The survey, as reported last week, ques­ they had not reported the incidents to the proper sex —8.1% tioned 568 students, 326 female and 242 male, officials.
    [Show full text]
  • The Downtown Planning & Design Studio, a Division of the Chattanooga/Hamilton County Regional Planning Agency, and This Plan Is the Result
    Page Title Page 1 of 1 Introduction Principles Ecology of Downtown District Plans Implementation Maps & Multimedia Contacts Main Menu ? Executive Summary Video All videos require Windows Media Player Download: Windows / Mac < Previous Next > file://E:\main.htm 3/2/2006 Page Title Page 1 of 2 Introduction Purpose of the Plan Introduction Process The Chattanooga Downtown Plan is the blueprint for our future, engendering the Principles principles and guidelines that will influence our urban development in the coming Ecology of Downtown years. District Plans Implementation Downtown is vital to all of us, whether we live there or not, whether we work there or Maps & Multimedia not. It is, in a very real sense, the heart of the community, and its health has a direct Contacts bearing on the health of all neighborhoods in the region. Right now, the indicators are good: between 1992 and 2002, downtown employment increased 38% compared to Main Menu the city-wide increase of 17%, raising the number of downtown workers to more than ? 46,000 – 22% of the metro workforce*. As our center of business, finance, culture and government, a thriving downtown can be an indicator of a thriving region, and the tax revenue generated by this commercial center helps to fund all our schools, our police protection and our road programs. In fact, downtown properties generate more than $5,000,000 in property tax revenue annually,** and downtown hotels account for nearly 45% of the total county room tax tax revenue***. Hundreds of Chattanoogans participated in the meetings that led to this plan. In the manner that has become typical of Chattanooga, ordinary citizens came together to share their own visions of what downtown Chattanooga can and should become.
    [Show full text]
  • Officials Tell of Drugs Confiscated on Campus Pipn^
    ?Tltcc7 IntMcr sity (Rcho \_/fcW9l V^lssue4 / Somber t>. WT , - , Officials tell of drugs pipn^ confiscated on campus By Stephanie Dawn Drug paraphernalia, such as their big problems. But, they will Echo Staff Reporter rolling papers, pipes and syringes, do what they can to maintain this are also in Ratchford's custody. steadiness, Lockmiller said. For the 24 years Lt. Larry Alcohol is the most common "There will be no tolerance of Lockmiller has been on the UTC drug seen on campus because "it any kind for illegal drugs on this campus, he has rarely run into a is socially acceptable in some parts campus," MacDougall said. drug problem. of the country," MacDougall said. A student must face the "The biggest part [of students! Although alcohol is prevalent consequences for his actions, that come here are in it for the at parties, there is no classification which could include a warning, education, not to do drugs," as to who is creating a drug probation or suspension from the Lockmiller said. problem on campus. Fraternities university, MacDougall said. Officials are not blind, however, are often the only ones in the Officials also recommend the they know that some students are spotlight, but this is a large help of the UTC Counseling abusing a drug of choice, said misconception. Center or outside facilities to those Dean Richard MacDougall, "One week it may be someone using any drug to excess, director of student housing. not in an organization, next it may Lockmiller said. These drugs of choice range be someone in an organization," Students may seek alternatives from marijuana to crack cocaine, Lockmiller said.
    [Show full text]
  • History & Records
    1 History & Records A special thanks to David Jenkins for taking the time and energy to compile the vast majority of this information. Records shown are updated through the end of the 2017 season. 2 CHATTANOOGA LOOKOUTS ROSTER 1976 - PRESENT Beaurivage, Ron 1976-77 Becker, Joe 2009, 2012 ** Lookouts in the Major Leagues Beech, Matt 2004** Beeler, Pete 1989, 1991 A Belisle, Matt 2006, 2008** Abbott, Jim 2006 Belk, Tim 1994** Abraham, Brian 1976 Bell, Josh 2009** Abreu, Tony 2009** Bell, Rick 2005 Acevedo, Jose 2001** Bell, Rob 1999** Acosta, Ryan 2013 Bell, Ronald 1976-77 Adair, Rick 1984-85 Bell, Terrence 1984** Adams, Craig 1978-79, 81-82 Adkins, James 2009-10 Benavides, Freddie 1989-90** Aidkins, Tim 2003 Bencomo, Omar 2016 Agree, Daniel 1977 Bene, Bill 1995 Aguasviva, Geison 2012-13 Benito, Baez 2004 Allen, Cedric 1996 Bentz, Chad 2006** Allen, Marlon 1997-98 Bergolla, William 2004** Allen, Rick 1991-92 Berrios, Jose 2015 Alvarado, Carlos 2006 Bess, Johnny 1994 Alvarez, Gabe 2001** Best, Karl 1986 Alvarez, Mario 2009-11 Blanco, Tony 2004** Alvarez, Roberto 1980-81 Bevel, Bobby 2003 Ames, Steven 2011-12 Blevins, Bobby 2010 Amezaga, Alfredo 2010 Bludau, Frank 2003 Anderson, Bryan 2003-05 Boer, Madison 2015 Anderson, Drew 2006-08 Boggs, Robert 1997 Anderson, Karl 1980-81 Anderson, Mike 1991-93** Bohnet, John 1981** Anderson, Nick 2017 Bohorquez, Carlos 2007 Anderson, Tom 1980 Bolek, Ken 1978 Andrew, Jason 2005 Bolivar, Luis 2006-08 Andrews, Clayton 2001-03** Bong, Jung 2006** Anthony, Dane 1981-82 Bonilla, Juan 1979** Antonini, Michael
    [Show full text]
  • UTC Football/Athletic Training Facility
    Project Title Football / Athletic Training Facility 540/005-04-2016 Institution UT Chattanooga Description This project will construct a new football/athletic training facility for the intercollegiate athletic program, located on the north edge of the campus from the McKenzie Arena as sited in the 2012 campus master plan. Additional Project Information: See Building Program and Appendix Project Schedule Designer Award by SBC Executive Sub-Committee – August 19, 2019 (Pending SBC Approval on August 8, 2019) Anticipated Licensed All disciplines as required for Basic Services Professionals and consultants for Basic Services: Estimated Total Project $22,000,000 Cost Maximum Allowable Construction Cost $17,730,000 (MACC) Designer Fee: $1,271,888 ($17,730,000 x .05739 x 1.25) Insurance Coverage Commercial General Liability Each Occurrence - $1,000,000 Aggregate - $1,000,000 Commercial Automobile Liability Any Auto – Each Accident, Combined Single Limit - $1,000,000 Workers’ Compensation as required by statute, including employers’ liability with limits of: Each Accident - $100,000 Disease, each employee - $100,000 Disease, policy limits - $500,000 Professional Liability Insurance Each Claim - $1,000,000 Annual Aggregate - $2,000,000 Project Category: Standard Designer Solicitation July 16, 2019 Date Letter of Interest Due July 30, 2019 at 12:00 pm ET Date Questions received until: July 23, 2019 at 5:00 pm ET Any updates regarding this solicitation will be emailed to potential proposers if request for notification is received via email to [email protected] by the date and time of the deadline for questions listed above. FOOTBALL /ATHLETIC FACILITY PROGRAM SBC NO. 540/005-04-2016 JULY 2019 UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA University of Tennessee Chattanooga Football / Athletic Facility Building Program SBC No.
    [Show full text]