DOCSLIB.ORG

Linneaus University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Linneaus University Linnaeus University School of Social Sciences Peace and Development Studies Spring 2010 Supervisor: Anders Nilsson Welcome to madness The role of Greece as the gatekeeper of Fortress Europe Georgia Dekavalla Sara Sabzian Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Greek people for their hospitality and openness. We would also like to offer our gratitude to all the respondents and apologise in case we have misinterpreted any of their comments. During our fieldwork in Athens, we have met people from many different countries, whose courage has inspired us greatly. Finally, we would like to thank our supervisor Anders Nilsson; without his guidance and support this thesis would not have been possible. Abstract This thesis aims to explore the different aspects of the phenomenon of migration in Greece, as a case study. The choice of country is motivated by its geographical position at Europe’s external borders. In order to gain an insight into the reality that migrants are faced with when searching for a better life in Europe, a field study was conducted in Athens, Greece during a period of six weeks in the spring of 2010. The field work included interviews with various actors and individuals that are directly involved in migration issues, informal discussions with migrants and personal observations. Additionally, secondary sources such as previous studies were used. The framework used to approach the material included elements from neo- institutionalism, hermeneutics as well as critical theory. The most important conclusions reached incorporate that the rights of migrants are not respected in any aspect of the societal sphere, or in other words the three institutional pillars, the regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive. As a result, there are double standards applied to Europeans respective migrants. As a possible cause of the problematic situation described, underlying perceptions of national identity versus “otherness” are identified. These perceptions derive from a deeply rooted acceptance of social constructions such as national borders, as undisputable facts. Key Words: Migration, Greece, Europe, neo-institutionalism, hermeneutics, critical theory Table of contents List of Abbreviations................................................................................................................................ 1 List of Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Aim and context of the study ........................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Research questions........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Relevance ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Structure........................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Analytical Framework.......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Neo‐institutional theory................................................................................................................ 4 2.1.1 Institutions.............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.2 The regulative pillar................................................................................................................ 6 2.1.3 The normative pillar ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1.4 The cultural‐cognitive pillar.................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Hermeneutics ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Critical theory .............................................................................................................................. 10 3. Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Respondents................................................................................................................................ 11 3.2 Validity and Reliability................................................................................................................. 11 3.3 Limitations during the field work ................................................................................................ 12 4. The European level............................................................................................................................ 12 4.1 European immigration and migration policy............................................................................... 12 4.1.1 The Schengen `acquis` and the Dublin Regulation............................................................... 13 4.2 European values ..........................................................................................................................17 4.2.1 Definition.............................................................................................................................. 17 4.2.2 European values vs. values in Europe .................................................................................. 18 4.2.3 Important principles regarding migration............................................................................ 18 4.3 Attitudes towards immigrants in Europe .................................................................................... 20 4.3.1 Ethnic exclusionism .............................................................................................................. 20 4.3.2 Gatekeeper attitudes throughout Europe............................................................................ 23 4.3.3 The level of informal solidarity throughout Europe............................................................. 24 5. National level..................................................................................................................................... 26 5.1 Greek immigration regulations ................................................................................................... 26 5.2 Greek norms and values.............................................................................................................. 29 5.3 Attitudes towards immigrants from a national perspective ....................................................... 30 5.3.1 The level of economic growth and unemployment ......................................................... 31 5.3.2 The percentage of immigrants living in Greece ............................................................... 32 5.3.3. Trends in migration ......................................................................................................... 34 5.4 Attitudes towards immigrants................................................................................................. 34 5.4.1. Age and sex...................................................................................................................... 34 5.4.2. Education and income..................................................................................................... 35 5.4.3. Employment status and satisfaction with the economic situation................................. 35 5.4.4. The presence of immigrants in the individual’s neighbourhood and friendship with a member of a minority ethnic group.......................................................................................... 36 5.4.5. Ideology ........................................................................................................................... 37 6. Results analysis.................................................................................................................................. 37 6.1 Public discourse and the media................................................................................................... 37 6.1.1 Characteristics of the public discourse on migration........................................................... 40 6.1.2 The language of the current discourse on migration........................................................... 42 6.2 European migration policies and the Dublin Regulation............................................................. 47 6.3 Institutional malpractices and violence ...................................................................................... 49 6.4 Corruption ................................................................................................................................... 53 6.5 Asylum system............................................................................................................................. 54 6.6 The new Government’s changes ................................................................................................. 56 6.7 Xenophobic tendencies among the Greek population................................................................ 58 6.8 Everyday life ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Of Populists, Chauvinists and Welfare States'
    Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät Institut für Politikwissenschaft MASTER THESIS ‘Of populists, chauvinists and welfare states’ Populist Radical Right Parties’ social policy stance and its attitudinal and value base Schriftliche Arbeit zur Erlangung des Akademischen Grades „Magister Artium“ an der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Hans-Jürgen Bieling Zweitgutachten: Dr. Rolf Frankenberger Eingereicht von: Moritz Gartiser Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit, dass ich diese Arbeit selbstständig und nur mit den angegebenen Hilfsmitteln angefertigt habe und dass ich alle Stellen, die dem Wortlaut oder dem Sinn nach anderen Werken oder dem Internet entnommen sind, durch Angabe der Quellen als Entlehnung kenntlich gemacht habe. Mir ist bewusst, dass Plagiate als Täuschungsversuch gewertet werden und im Wiederholungsfall zum Verlust der Prüfungsberechtigung führen können. __________________ ______________________ Ort, Datum Unterschrift Table of contents List of figures ........................................................................................................................................... i List of tables ............................................................................................................................................. i Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... ii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Attitudes on Migration: Rethinking How People Perceive Migration
    Funded by the European Union Public attitudes on migration: rethinking how people perceive migration An analysis of existing opinion polls in the Euro-Mediterranean region 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Developed for ICMPD under the EU funded programme Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 EUROMED Migration IV by the Observatory of Public What are attitudes to migration in the EuroMediterranean region today? .................................................................................................................... 13 Attitudes to Migration - Migration Policy Centre, European University Institute, Florence What evidence exists on attitudes to migration in the EuroMediterranean region? ..................................................................................................... 21 Overview of existing surveys examining public attitudes to migration in the Southern Mediterranean and typology of questions asked .... 21 Dr. James Dennison Overview of existing surveys examining public attitudes to migration in Europe and typology of questions asked ...................................... 21 Dr. Lenka Dražanová European international
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Ethnic Divide Toward a Cultural-Sociological Understanding of Ethnocentrism
    Beyond the Ethnic Divide Toward a Cultural-Sociological Understanding of Ethnocentrism Katerina Manevska Beyond the Ethnic Divide Toward a Cultural-Sociological Understanding of Ethnocentrism De etnische scheidslijn voorbij Naar een cultuursociologisch begrip van etnocentrisme Proefschrift Ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van de rector magnificus Prof.dr. H. Pols en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties. De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op vrijdag 16 mei 2014 om 11:30 uur door Katerina Manevska geboren te Nijmegen Promotor: Prof.dr. D. Houtman Overige leden: Prof.dr. M. Elchardus Prof.dr. C.J.M. van Eijck Dr. J. van der Waal Copromotor: Prof.dr. P.H.J. Achterberg Cover illustration by Harko Wubs Lay-out and design by Hans Wubs (hansfrielans.nl) ISBN: 978-94-6259-155-4 To my beloved parents Za tato i mama Acknowledgements Finishing a dissertation is known to be a lonely process. Of course I have spent lots of lonely hours working on it, but as I have learned throughout my four years as a PhD student, the final outcome of a research project heavily depends upon the input received from others. Fortunately, I have been surrounded by people, both profession- ally and in my private life, who have offered much-valued support and inspiration. They have helped me shape my PhD research and have formed me both as a researcher and as a person. For this I am extremely grateful and I happily take the opportunity to thank some persons in particular here. First and foremost, I wish to thank my supervisors Dick Houtman and Peter Ach- terberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Group Threat Theory
    Advancing Group Threat Theory Contributions of panel-, experimental- and multilevel analyses Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. soc.) des Fachbereichs Gesellschaftswissenschaften der Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen vorgelegt von Elmar Schlüter aus Paderborn 2007 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Peter Schmidt, Justus-Liebig Universität Giessen 2 Acknowledgements This dissertation is the result of the last three years which I spent as a fellow of the DFG-Research Training School Group-Focused Enmity at the Philipps- University of Marburg and the University of Bielefeld. At this point I would like to take the opportunity to thank all the people who supported me and my research during this period. First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor Peter Schmidt and Ulrich Wagner for their professional and personal advice in writing this dissertation. Furthermore, I would like to thank all my colleagues and staff members of the Group-Focused Enmity Research Training School for the good cooperation, in particular Johannes Ullrich and Oliver Christ for sharing theoretical and methodological inspiration, hotel rooms and drinks which made our – various – lecture tours worthwhile. I would also like to thank Reiner Becker not only for technical support, Eldad Davidov, Sabine Manke for sharing the burden associated with the ‘D-word’ and help, Olaf Sosath and Martin Klehr a.k.a the Computer Squad for saving my data and myself more than once, and Antje Kluge and Zoe Felder for excellent ‘catering’ and reminding me, sometimes literally, to keep on running. Special thanks go to Marcel Coenders and Peer Scheepers who were my hosts during my research stay at the ICS Radboud University Nijmegen, to Tom Pettigrew for his expertise on various occasions as well as to Andreas Zick for a very valuable contribution during the last phase of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION III Theoretical Perspectives on Race and Crime READING
    SECTION III Theoretical Perspectives on Race and Crime SECTION HIGHLIGHTS · What Is Theory? · Biological Theories on Race and Crime · Sociological Theories on Race and Crime · Summary · Edited Readings y What Is Theory? According to Bohm (2001), “A theory is an explanation” (p. 1). Some theory can be found in practically everything we do. When it comes to explaining crime, just about everyone has an opinion. All of these insights, however, might not qualify as scientific theory. Curran and Renzetti (2001) stated that a scientific theory is “a set of interconnected state- ments or propositions that explain how two or more events or factors are related to one another” (p. 2). Furthermore, scientific theories are usually logically sound and empiri- cally testable. They also help us “expand our knowledge of the world around us and sug- gest systematic solutions to problems we repeatedly confront” (p. 2). Many of the theories reviewed in this chapter fit some of the criteria posed by Curran and Renzetti, whereas others do not—but in our view, they all provide useful insights into race and crime. This section provides a brief introduction to theories that have been applied to racial/ethnic groups and their involvement in crime. For example, we review biological approaches that look to physical features or genetic inheritance to explain 95 96 RACE AND CRIME: A TEXT/READER crime. We also review sociological theories that have their foundations in the American social structure, social processes, or culture. We begin with a review of biological theories and how they have been applied to explain crime committed by racial/ethnic groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Threat and Racial Disparities in Police-Caused Killings
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2020 Group Threat and Racial Disparities in Police-Caused Killings Ruben A. Ortiz University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Recommended Citation Ortiz, Ruben A., "Group Threat and Racial Disparities in Police-Caused Killings. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2020. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/5823 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Ruben A. Ortiz entitled "Group Threat and Racial Disparities in Police-Caused Killings." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Sociology. Stephanie A. Bohon, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Michelle Brown, Kasey Henricks, Tyler Wall, Nicholas Nagle Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Group Threat and Racial Disparities in Police-Caused Killings A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Ruben A. Ortiz May 2020 ABSTRACT Blacks, Latinos, and American Indians are killed by police at a disproportionately higher rate than whites and Asians, but whether racial discrimination accounts for these killings remains disputed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ess Eric Deliverable
    ESS ERIC WP11, Task 11.4 (Deliverable 11.8) ESS ERIC DELIVERABLE ESS ERIC WORK PROGRAMME 01 JUNE 2019 – 31 MAY 2021 DELIVERABLE NUMBER: 11.8 DELIVERALBE TITLE: ESS annual bibliographic report 2019 WORK PACKAGE Number: WP11 (Science communication and academic impact monitoring) SUBMITTED BY: UL – University of Ljubljana Brina AUTHOR(S): MALNAR, UL DISSEMINATION STATUS: Open SUBMITTED: 13 December 2019 ACCEPTED: 15 January 2020 1 ESS ERIC WP11, Task 11.4 (Deliverable 11.8) European Social Survey academic impact monitoring Annual report 2019 Brina Malnar Public Opinion Research Centre at the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana 2 ESS ERIC WP11, Task 11.4 (Deliverable 11.8) Aims, methods and content of the report In order to evaluate ESS academic impact, guide its questionnaire design and refinement, inform its outreach and communications actions and similar, ESS needs continuous and detailed feedback about its academic use. Bibliographic monitoring is the main self- observation tool to obtain such information. It provides: ▪ Empirical evidence on the scope, geographical and disciplinary patterns of ESS academic usage, theory development and policy references; ▪ Support for informed decision-making of the ESS bodies (CST, SAB and QDTs) concerning the questionnaire content (item and modules selection and revision), targeting training and communication strategies and similar. ▪ Summary bibliographic reports, statistics and tailor-made lists of citations that help demonstrate ESS academic relevance to European and national funders and users. ▪ Bibliographic repository for other work packages to be used for methodological testing, updating of ESS online bibliography, as well as to support ESS communication actions and produce relevant outreach materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Fear of Small Numbers? Immigrant Population Size And
    Fear of Small Numbers? Immigrant population size and electoral support for the populist radical right in Switzerland Introduction Over the last three decades, populist radical right parties (PRR) have moved away from their post-Second World War marginalization and have reasserted their agencies in different forms and shapes in the European political landscape (Mudde 2007). Although mobilization of grievances over immigration has been the uniting factor of successful PRR parties (Ivarsflaten 2007; Van der Brug, Fennema, and Tillie 2000), the extent to which this trend is a response to the demographic realities associated with the proportion of migrant populations in receiving countries is still uncertain: some studies have uncovered negative or positive associations both across (Golder 2003; Knigge 1998; Lubbers, Gijsberts, and Scheepers 2002) as well as within (Coffé, Heyndels, and Vermeir 2007; Stein, Post, and Rinden 2000) countries, while others have failed to find significant patterns (Lubbers and Scheepers 2000). Seeking to reconcile these contradictory findings, we explore the impact of immigrant population size on PRR voting behavior in Switzerland. This context constitutes an interesting case for two reasons: firstly, the Swiss People’s Party (SVP/UDC) is one of the most successful PRR parties in Europe, having gained 26.6% of the popular vote in the 2011 Swiss Federal Election; secondly, Switzerland is one of the leading immigration countries with 22% of the country’s total population in 2010 born abroad (Statistical Atlas of Switzerland 2010). We use data procured from the Swiss Electoral Studies (Selects 2011) and the Statistical Atlas of Switzerland (2010), and draw on two established, yet contradictory, theories of ethnic hostility, group threat theory and intergroup contact theory.
    [Show full text]
  • EDCAS Bericht
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Schaeffer, Merlin; Koopmans, Ruud; Veit, Susanne; Wagner, Mareike; Wiedner, Jonas Working Paper The Ethnic Diversity and Collective Action Survey (EDCAS): Technical report WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP IV 2011-701 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Schaeffer, Merlin; Koopmans, Ruud; Veit, Susanne; Wagner, Mareike; Wiedner, Jonas (2011) : The Ethnic Diversity and Collective Action Survey (EDCAS): Technical report, WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP IV 2011-701, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57767 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Efficacy, Threat, and Urban Change
    ABSTRACT Title: COLLECTIVE EFFICACY, THREAT, AND URBAN CHANGE: EXAMINING SOCIAL CONTROL FORCES IN AREAS OF GENTRIFICATION Kathryn Noe Kozey, Doctor of Philosophy, 2015 Dissertation directed by: Professor Raymond Paternoster Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice Since the term gentrification was first coined in the 1960s, scholars have had an interest in understanding how this process of change can impact neighborhoods. Empirical research focusing on the relationship between gentrification and crime has yielded varying results, with little examination of the contextual mechanisms which may influence the relationship. In addition, little empirical attention has been devoted to the possibility of the spatial displacement of crime due to gentrification. The purpose of this dissertation is to contribute to our understanding of how gentrification impacts levels of crime in three ways. First, using data from the U.S. Census, the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, and the Chicago Transit Authority, I examine whether gentrification is significantly associated with lower levels of crime. Second, I examine levels of crime in gentrifying and adjacent areas to assess the presence of spatial displacement. Third, I incorporate two contextual factors – collective efficacy and perceived neighborhood change – to examine whether or not they modify the relationship between gentrification and crime. Analyses utilize multilevel modeling techniques and difference-in-differences estimation. Results offer preliminary support for the moderating roles of collective efficacy and perceived neighborhood change mechanisms on the relationship between gentrification and crime. While there is an overall negative association between gentrification and crime, this effect is strengthened with collective efficacy, but reversed with rising levels of perceived neighborhood change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Urban Status on Xenophobic Sentiment
    The Effect of Urban Status on Xenophobic Sentiment A Case Study THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert Joseph VandenBerg Graduate Program in Sociology The Ohio State University 2014 Master's Examination Committee: Edward Crenshaw (Advisor), Craig Jenkins, and Vincent Roscigno Copyrighted by Robert Joseph VandenBerg 2014 Abstract Although the existing transnational literature on xenophobia is voluminous, it has mostly neglected the effect of urban status on intergroup relations. This article addresses this shortcoming by integrating theories from urban sociology with work on ingroup-outgroup dynamics drawn from contact theory, group threat theory, social identity theory, and social dominance theory. Method: Using a sample drawn from the sixth wave of the European Social Survey, I construct a critical experiment modelling the effect of both residential status and outgroup presence on xenophobia in the Scandinavian states. Findings: My results point to inconsistent influences of urbanity/urbanism on xenophobia, but a robust negative influence of percent foreign on xenophobia (i.e., partial support for contact theory). Conversely, my critical experiment, which takes the form of interacting residential status (urbanity) and foreign percentage, is positive and consistent with group threat theory, social identity theory, and social dominance theory. I conclude with speculation on how sample selection and composition plays into these findings, as well as with suggestions for future research. ii Acknowledgments I am indebted for helpful comments to Claudia Buchmann, Edwards Crenshaw, Craig Jenkins, Marta Kołczyńska, Carolyn Morgan, Matthew Soener, and Vincent Roscigno. However, all errors and omissions are entirely my own.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Analysis of Attitudes Towards Immigrants in Asia Rachael
    Network Analysis of Attitudes towards Immigrants in Asia Rachael Kei Kawasaki1*, Yuichi Ikeda1 1Graduate School of Advanced Integrated Studies in Human Survivability, Kyoto University, 1 Nakaadachi-cho, Yoshida, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8306 *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This study models cross-national attitudes towards immigrants in East and Southeast Asia as a signed and weighted bipartite network of countries and evaluative reactions to a variety of political issues, or determinants. This network is then projected into two one-mode networks, one of countries and one of determinants, and community detection methods are applied. The paper aims to fill two deficiencies in the current research on attitudes towards immigrants: 1) the lack of cross-national studies in Asia, a region where migration is growing, and 2) the tendency of researchers to treat determinants as uncorrelated, despite the interdependent nature of evaluative reactions. The results show that the nine countries in the sample are a cohesive clique, showing greater similarities than differences in the determinants of their attitudes. A blockmodeling approach was employed to identify eight determinants in attitudes towards immigrants, namely views on independence and social dependencies, group identities, absolute or relative moral orientation, attitudes towards democracy, science and technology, prejudice and stigma, and two determinants related to religion. However, the findings of this survey yielded some surprising results when compared with the literature review. First, education was not found to be a significant determinants of attitudes towards immigrants, despite its strong and consistent predictive power in European models. Second, prejudice appears to be mediated in part by religion, especially in religious identification and belief in God.
    [Show full text]