DOCSLIB.ORG

Andrzej Duda and Rafal Trzaskowski Will Face Each Other in the Second

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN POLAND 12th July 2020 Outgoing President Andrzej Duda European and the Mayor of Warsaw Rafal Elections monitor Trzaskowski will face each other Corinne Deloy during the second round of the Polish presidential election on July 12 Results Outgoing President Andrzej Duda (Law and Justice, PiS) who was running as a freelancer, took third place with came out ahead in the first round of the presidential 13.85% of the votes. He failed to embody an alternative election in Poland on June 28. He won 43.67% of the force capable of dethroning the country's two main vote and Rafal Trzaskowski, Mayor of Warsaw and parties, which have fought a fierce battle in every former Minister of Administration and Digital Affairs election for the past fifteen years. Krzysztof Bosak (2013-2014), candidate of the Civic Platform (PO) led (National Movement, RN) won 6.75% of the votes. The by Grzegorz Schetyna, who obtained 30.34% of the other seven candidates each received less than 3%. votes. The two men will face on July 12 for a second round of voting. More than six in ten Poles voted (62.90%), 13.64 points more than in the first round of the previous presidential Szymon Holownia, a journalist and presenter of the election on May 10 2015. television programme Poland has incredible talent Results of the first round of the presidential election on June 28 2020 in Poland Turn out: 62.90% Number of votes won % of votes won Candidates (first round) (first round) Andrzej Duda (Law and justice, PiS) 8 412 188 43.67 Rafal Trzaskowski (Civic Platform, PO) 5 845 164 30.64 Szymon Holownia (independent) 2 667 655 13.85 Krzysztof Bosak (National Movement RN), 1 360 923 6.75 Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz (Farmers’ Party PSL) 457 092 2.37 Robert Biedron (Wiosna) 425 734 2.21 Stanislaw Zoltek (New Right Congress, KNP) 45 092 0.23 Marek Jakubiak, independent 33 294 0.17 Pawel Tanajno, independent 27 610 0.14 Waldemar Witkowski (Labour Union, UP) 26 877 0.14 Miroslaw Piotrowski (Movement of Real Europe) 20 944 0.11 Source: https://wybory.gov.pl/prezydent20200628/pl/wyniki/pl Political issues FONDATION ROBERT SCHUMAN / PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN POLAND / 12TH JULY 2020 Presidential elections in Poland 12th July 2020 Andrzej Duda, a strong favourite in the election until a Rafal Trzaskowski replaced the Vice-President of the few weeks ago (some opinion polls showed him to be Parliament Malgorzata Kidawa-Blonska as the Civic victorious in the first round), saw his lead shrink as the Platform's candidate in the presidential election on May 02 difficulties in organising the election by the government 16. The latter, who had fallen below 5% of the vote led by Mateusz Morawiecki (PiS) became apparent. in opinion polls, chose to withdraw. "Rafal Trzaskowski Originally scheduled for May 10, the presidential election set the tone and Andrzej Duda tried to regain control, had been postponed indefinitely, before being set for without much success. The LGBT issue was raised June 28 (second round on July 12) due to the coronavirus very late in the campaign, compared to the previous pandemic[1] and the government's inability to reach a elections, which shows a certain form of panic within compromise with the opposition on the modalities of the the ruling party," analysed Ben Stanley, professor of vote as well as its legality. political science at the University of Social Sciences and Humanities (SWPS) in Warsaw. Feeling weakened, Andrzej Duda stepped up his election campaign in the last month to better mobilize his supporters: "I won this first round thanks to your votes in an absolutely he strongly defended family values and opposed the unquestionable way. The lead is huge and I'm grateful to recognition of the rights of sexual minorities. On June 13, you for that. The campaign is going to continue, we are he compared the defenders of the rights of homosexual having a very important discussion about Poland, we raise and transgender (LGBT) minorities, who for him "are not the question of the Poland of the future," said Andrzej human beings", to "defenders of Bolshevik ideology". Duda on the announcement of the first results. Andrzej Duda clearly sought to distinguish himself from his main opponent, Rafal Trzaskowski, a signatory of the Rafal Trzaskowski said that "the second round will not be LGBT+ Charter, who, for his part, advocates tolerance and a choice between Andrzej Duda and Rafal Trzaskowski, openness towards sexual minorities. but a choice between an open Poland and a Poland that is always looking for an enemy and prefers to divide the By hardening his tone, the outgoing president may have population" adding "I will be the candidate for change". locked himself into conservative rhetoric that could make it difficult to rally moderate voters in the second round. The victory of the PO candidate is possible on July 12 "Unlike parliamentary elections, you need more than 50 but the outgoing head of state Andrzej Duda does not percent of the vote to win a presidential election. Andrzej admit defeat. He is the incumbent president and enjoys Duda therefore needs the centrist electorate. By stirring up preferential treatment in the State media, an important the LGBT issue, he has mobilized his base, but moderate advantage in a context where the election campaign is voters may find his rhetoric too clumsy, too extreme," said made difficult. Stanley Bill, a professor of Polish studies at Cambridge University. Krzysztof Bosak's voters are expected to switch The second round is therefore very open. We will see on to Andrzej Duda on July 12, but this rapprochement could July 12 whether Poland chooses to turn the page on Duda deter Poles who have voted for other candidates from or whether it prefers to keep its trust in him for the next doing the same. five years. You can read all of our publications on our site : www.robert-schuman.eu Publishing Director : Pascale JOANNIN [1] As of June 28, Poland had THE FONDATION ROBERT SCHUMAN, created in 1991 and acknowledged by State decree in 1992, is the main 33,907 cases of Covid-19. The country recorded 1,438 deaths French research centre on Europe. It develops research on the European Union and its policies and promotes the content due to the disease (Ministry of Health figures). of these in France , Europe and abroad. It encourages, enriches and stimulates European debate thanks to its research, publications and the organisation of conferences. The Foundation is presided over by Mr. Jean‑Dominique Giuliani Political issues FONDATION ROBERT SCHUMAN / PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN POLAND / 12TH JULY 2020.
Recommended publications
  • Download=47:Poland-Germany-Partnership-For-Europe

    Download=47:Poland-Germany-Partnership-For-Europe

    BRIEF POLICY AFTER TUSK: POLAND IN EUROPE Piotr Buras SUMMARY The departures of Donald Tusk and Radoslaw Sikorski Poland has just experienced the most mark the end of an era in Polish politics. Tusk will take successful decade in its modern history. It took office as president of the European Council on 1 December, advantage of the opportunities presented by EU integration and has enjoyed stable political and Sikorski left the Ministry of Foreign Affairs after the and economic development. Not hit by the government reshuffle in September to become Marshal of economic crisis and led by the tandem of Tusk the Sejm (chair of the Polish parliament). Together, the and Sikorski, Warsaw won the confidence of former prime minister and the former foreign minister its main EU partners, most notably Berlin, emblematise Poland’s success in recent years in achieving and earned a strong position within the bloc. The nomination of Tusk for the post of the clear economic gains and making a splash in foreign and president of the European Council marked the European affairs. Against a backdrop of financial and end of this unprecedented era. The next decade economic crisis, Poland emerged as an important player on may be more difficult and a continuation of the European stage. Poland’s successful run is by no means certain. The country needs a new economic model As the only country in Europe not to experience an economic to sustain its impressive growth. It faces political dilemmas with regard to accession slump, Warsaw benefited politically from the crisis – and to the eurozone as well as to its eastern and became an important ally to Berlin.
  • Zaufanie Do Polityków W Kwietniu

    Zaufanie Do Polityków W Kwietniu

    Warszawa, kwiecień 2013 BS/53/2013 ZAUFANIE DO POLITYKÓW W KWIETNIU Znak jakości przyznany CBOS przez Organizację Firm Badania Opinii i Rynku 11 stycznia 2013 roku Fundacja Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej ul. Żurawia 4a, 00-503 Warszawa e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] http://www.cbos.pl (48 22) 629 35 69 Największym zaufaniem Polaków niezmiennie cieszy się prezydent Bronisław Komorowski. W kwietniu1 zaufanie do głowy państwa zadeklarowało 70% ankietowanych, a więc dokładnie tyle samo, co w dwóch poprzednich miesiącach. Na dobrą pamięć Polaków zasłużył, jak się okazuje, były prezydent Aleksander Kwaśniewski, który po wieloletniej przerwie ponownie włączył się w nurt bieżącej polityki, patronując lewicowej inicjatywie Europa Plus. Według deklaracji uzyskanych w pierwszej dekadzie kwietnia 2013 roku, Aleksandrowi Kwaśniewskiemu ufa 54% ankietowanych. Zaufanie do pozostałych osób aktywnych na scenie politycznej kształtuje się na znacznie niższym poziomie. Niezmiennie zaliczający się do ścisłej czołówki naszego rankingu Ryszard Kalisz oraz najlepiej oceniany spośród przedstawicieli rządzącej koalicji szef MSZ Radosław Sikorski cieszą się zaufaniem mniej niż połowy badanych. Wykluczonemu ostatnio z SLD Ryszardowi Kaliszowi ufa 46% respondentów, nieco mniej osób (43%) deklaruje zaufanie do szefa polskiej dyplomacji. Kolejne miejsca na liście najczęściej obdarzanych zaufaniem polityków zajmują: lider SLD Leszek Miller (36%), wiceprzewodniczący PO Grzegorz Schetyna (35%), premier Donald Tusk i przewodniczący Solidarnej Polski Zbigniew Ziobro (po 34% deklaracji zaufania) oraz prezes PiS Jarosław Kaczyński (33%). Nieco rzadziej z zaufaniem respondentów spotykają się inni prominentni politycy rządzącej koalicji: minister sprawiedliwości Jarosław Gowin (31%), marszałek Sejmu Ewa Kopacz (30%) oraz szef PSL, wicepremier i minister gospodarki Janusz Piechociński (28%). Prawie jedna czwarta badanych ufa liderowi NSZZ „Solidarność” Piotrowi Dudzie (24%) i niemal tyle samo (23%) deklaruje zaufanie do szefa sejmowego zespołu ds.
  • In Annual Speeches of the Republic of Poland Ministers of Foreign Affairs After 2001

    In Annual Speeches of the Republic of Poland Ministers of Foreign Affairs After 2001

    Przegląd Strategiczny 2017, nr 10 Piotr POCHYŁY DOI : 10.14746/ps.2017.1.12 University of Zielona Góra THE CONCEPT OF “SECURITY” IN ANNUAL SPEECHES OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND MINISTERS OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AFTER 2001 The purpose of the publication is to present how the concept of security has been de- fined in annual speeches of Poland’s foreign ministers after the 9/11 attacks in 2001. Research problem: the impact of the international situation on ways of ensuring Po- land’s security in the annual speeches of Polish foreign ministers. Apart from the as- pect of classically understood security, the analysis also covers modern categories of security that is economic, public, ecological, energy or food security. The temporal range is from 2001 to 2017. Following the definition in the Polish Language Diction- ary published by PWN I define “security” as “the state of non-threat” (Bezpieczeństwo, 2017). * * * Every year foreign ministers of Poland give their annual speeches – officially known as the Information of the Foreign Minister on the goals of foreign policy, in which they define priorities, characterize challenges, and present corrections to the policy. Sometimes it is just an ordinary fulfilment of the obligation, which does not provoke greater conflicts or reflections and is presented in the nearly empty hall, but since 2010, after the plane crash near Smolensk, there have been very exciting debates connected with disputes in the Parliament (speeches given by Radosław Sikorski between 2011–2014), also in connection to responsibility for state security. The speeches which were urgent responses to events in the world (Sikorski, 2014) and the ones that were given when new governments came to power: (Cimoszewicz, 2002; Meller, 2006; Sikorski, 2008; Sikorski, 2012; Waszczykowski, 2016) will be particularly relevant to the search for answers to the research problem because apart from presenting current issues the ministers were obliged to discuss four-year for- eign policy assumptions.
  • Mbs Has to Be Dealt with for Khashoggi Murder: US Senator

    Mbs Has to Be Dealt with for Khashoggi Murder: US Senator

    BUSINESS | Page 1 SPORT | Page 8 Imam, Hafeez steer Pakistan to Synergistic opportunities victory over prevail between Qatar and South Africa Canada, says Doha Bank CEO published in QATAR since 1978 SUNDAY Vol. XXXIX No. 11069 January 20, 2019 Jumada I 14, 1440 AH GULF TIMES www. gulf-times.com 2 Riyals Warm welcome for rally champion In brief More Al Furjan stores QATAR | Offi cial scheduled to open soon Amir to attend Arab summit in Beirut today QNA The motivation behind this project His Highness the Amir Sheikh Tamim Doha is the estimated increase in popula- bin Hamad al-Thani will attend tion within the city of Doha and its the Arab Economic and Social surroundings. The retail mix has been Development Summit to be held he Qatar Development Bank devised to cater to the most important today in Beirut at the invitation of (QDB) announced yesterday that needs. Lebanese President General Michel Tthe construction of the second QDB will not raise rental rates for Aoun. An off icial delegation is batch of outlets for Al Furjan Markets 2 commercial outlets included in Phase accompanying the Amir. project has begun. 2 of its Al Furjan Markets project, al- The new markets will be located in Khalifa had said earlier. QATAR | Diplomacy areas such as Ain Khalid, Luaib, Bani He said the existing rents at Al Furjan Hajer, Al Aziziya, Al Gharafa, Muaither, Markets across the country are pegged Amir and Mali president Al Shamal and Al Wakrah. at QR6,000 per month. hold phone conversation The fi rst batch of Al Furjan Markets His Highness the Amir Sheikh Tamim was located in Umm Al Qarn and Al The markets will provide all bin Hamad al-Thani yesterday held Khor among other areas.
  • PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS in POLAND 25Th October 2015

    PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS in POLAND 25Th October 2015

    PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN POLAND 25th October 2015 European Elections monitor The conservative opposition running favourite in the upcoming parliamentary elections in Poland Corinne Deloy Abstract: Just a few months after the unexpected victory of Andrzej Duda in the presidential election on 10th and 24th May last the Poles are returning to ballot on 25th October next to renew the two chambers of their parliament. All of the polls forecast victory by the main opposition party Law Analysis and Justice (PiS) in a country that is still divided between the industrial west which leans rather more to the Civic Platform (PO), a liberal party in office for the last eight years, and the east, which is more rural and closer to the conservative forces embodied by PiS Justice. The most recent poll by CBOS and published on 2014 of former Prime Minister Donald Tusk (PO) as 25th September and published by CBOS credits the the President of the European Council. However the PiS with 34% of the vote and Civic Platform with country is at a crossroads and in a month’s time will 30%. The Kukiz’15 group created by the candidate make a vital choice between two opposite paths, in the last presidential election, Pawel Kukiz, is due personified for the first time in the country’s history to come third with 9%; of the vote. The United by two women. Left (ZL) is due to win 5% of the vote – i.e. below the 8% voting threshold vital for a coalition to be THE OUTGOING GOVERNMENT IN DIFFI- represented in parliament – likewise the People’s CULTY Party (PSL).
  • EJTS European Journal of Transformation Studies 2020, Vol.8, Supplement 1

    EJTS European Journal of Transformation Studies 2020, Vol.8, Supplement 1

    EJTS European Journal of Transformation Studies 2020, Vol.8, Supplement 1 1 EJTS European Journal of Transformation Studies 2020, Vol.8, Supplement 1 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRANSFORMATION STUDIES 2020 Vol. 8 Supplement 1 © by Europe Our House, Tbilisi e-ISSN 2298-0997 2 EJTS European Journal of Transformation Studies 2020, Vol.8, Supplement 1 Arkadiusz Modrzejewski University of Gdansk, Poland [email protected] Editors Tamar Gamkrelidze Europe Our House, Tbilisi, Georgia Tatiana Tökölyová Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Trnava, Slovakia Rafał Raczyński Research Institute for European Policy, Poland Paweł Nieczuja–Ostrowski – executive editor Pomeranian University in Slupsk, Poland Jaroslav Mihálik – deputy editor Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Trnava, Slovakia Edita Poórová – copy editor Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Trnava, Slovakia Andrii Kutsyk– assistant editor Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, Lutsk, Ukraine Editorial Advisory Board Prof. Jakub Potulski,University of Gdansk, Poland – chairperson Prof. Tadeusz Dmochowski,University of Gdansk, Poland Prof. Slavomír Gálik, University of Ss.Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Slovakia Prof. Wojciech Forysinski, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famangusta, Northern Cyprus Prof. Danuta Plecka, Zielona Gora University, Poland Prof. Anatoliy Kruglashov, Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine Prof. Malkhaz Matsaberidze, Ivane Javakashvili Tbilisi State University Prof. Ruizan Mekvabidze, Gori State Teaching University, Georgia Prof. Lucia Mokrá, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia Prof. Andras Bozoki, Central European University in Budapest, Hungary Prof. Tereza - Brînduşa Palade, National University of Political and Public Administra- tion in Bucharest, Romania Prof. Elif Çolakoğlu, Atatürk University in Erzurum, Turkey Prof. Valeriu Mosneaga, Moldova State University in Chişinău, Republic of Moldova Prof. Andrei Taranu, National University of Political Science and Public Administration in Bucharest, Romania Prof.
  • P R E Z Y D E N T W K O N St Y T U C Ja C H

    P R E Z Y D E N T W K O N St Y T U C Ja C H

    PREZYDENT W Oddawana do rąk Czytelnika książka, stanowiąca efekt współpracy między stu- dentami, doktorantami oraz pracownikami naukowymi Wydziału Prawa i Admi- nistracji Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu oraz Wydziału Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, opisuje w sposób złożony i wielo- aspektowy instytucję prawną Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z perspektywy trzech różnych regulacji konstytucyjnych, które istniały w przeszłości albo istnieją obecnie w polskim porządku prawnym: Konstytucji marcowej z 1921 r., Konstytu- cji kwietniowej z 1935 r. oraz Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 1997 r. KONSTYTUCJACH Maciej Pewiński – magister prawa, obecnie doktorant w Katedrze Prawa Finan- sowego UWr; jego główne zainteresowania badawcze i naukowe koncentrują się wokół prawa konsumenckiego, bankowego oraz nowoczesnych technologii. Maciej Pisz – doktorant na Wydziale Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu War- szawskiego; autor książek i artykułów naukowych z obszaru nauk prawnych; sty- RP pendysta MNiSW dla doktorantów za wybitne osiągnięcia naukowe w dziedzinie nauk prawnych. Michał Przychodzki – student MISHiS UAM; prowadzona przez niego działalność naukowa skupia się na instytucjach prawa konstytucyjnego, społeczeństwie oby- watelskim oraz demokracji w strukturach Unii Europejskiej. Rafał Świergiel – student MISHiS UAM; jego zainteresowania naukowe koncen- trują się wokół prawa konstytucyjnego (w szczególności funkcjonowania władzy wykonawczej w Polsce), historii powszechnej XX wieku oraz praktyki życia poli- tycznego w Polsce. ISBN 978-83-65599-13-1 9 7 8 8 3 6 5 5 9 9 1 3 1 rezydent w PKONSTYTUCJACH RP rezydent w PKONSTYTUCJACH RP Maciej Pewiński Maciej Pisz Michał Przychodzki Rafał Świergiel © Copyright by Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Poznań 2018 isbn 978-83-65599-13-1 recenzent: dr Antoni Rost redakcja językowa i techniczna: Julia Chęcińska Natalia Mąka Igor Gontarz Jakub Choryński skład i projekt okładki: Libron wydawca: Uniwersytet im.
  • Working Papers No

    Working Papers No

    UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW FACULTY OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES Working Papers No. 7/2021 (355) PERSUASIVE MESSAGES WILL NOT RAISE COVID-19 VACCINE ACCEPTANCE. EVIDENCE FROM A NATION-WIDE ONLINE EXPERIMENT RAMAN KACHURKA MICHAŁ W. KRAWCZYK JOANNA RACHUBIK Warsaw 2021 WORKING PAPERS 7/2021 (355) Persuasive messages will not raise COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Evidence from a nation-wide online experiment Raman Kachurka, Michał W. Krawczyk, Joanna Rachubik University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences Corresponding authors: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Although mass vaccination is the best way out of the pandemic, the share of sceptics is very substantial in most countries. Social campaigns can emphasize the many arguments that potentially raise acceptance for vaccines: e.g., that they have been developed, tested, and recommended by doctors and scientists; that they are safe, effective and in demand. We verified the effectiveness of such messages in an online experiment conducted in February and March 2021 with a sample of almost six thousand adult Poles, which was nationally representative in terms of key demographic variables. We presented responders with different sets of information about vaccination against COVID-19. After reading the information bundle, they indicated whether they would be willing to be vaccinated. We also asked them to justify their answers and indicate who or what might change their opinion. Finally, we elicited a number of individual characteristics and opinions. We found that nearly 45% of the responders were unwilling to be vaccinated and none of the popular messages we used was effective in reducing this hesitancy.
  • In the Shadow of Plagues:2020 Presidential Elections in Poland

    In the Shadow of Plagues:2020 Presidential Elections in Poland

    DOI : 10.14746/pp.2021.26.2.3 Piotr SULA University of Wrocław ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5377-5684 Małgorzata MADEJ University of Wrocław ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5274-8614 Kamil BŁASZCZYŃSKI University of Wrocław ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4896-8371 In the shadow of plagues:2020 presidential elections in Poland Abstract: Presidential elections in Poland have always drawn more voters to the ballot box than par- liamentary ones. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the turnout in the 2020 presidential elections was the second-highest since 1989. The glib answer might be that voters were simply availing themselves of the opportunity to leave the house, however briefly, since COVID-19 measures had largely confined people to their homes for most of the year. More likely, albeit paradoxically, heightened voter interest was triggered by political autocratisation, the other plague that Poles have been struggling with, in this case since 2015. The election was won by the incumbent, Andrzej Duda, whose advantage was credited to his appeal among less-educated and older people living in rural areas. In the end, the governing Law and Justice (PiS) party, which had backed Duda’s campaign, managed to avoid cohabitation-related inconvenience for the second time. Key words: Presidential elections, voting behaviour, autocratisation, pandemic, Poland Introduction residential elections in semi-presidential systems seem to be as important as par- Pliamentary ones. This claim is grounded on the observations that all political par- ties invest their effort and resources to win these elections and that citizens tend to vote for a candidate for head of state more often than for prospective deputies.
  • REPUBLIC of POLAND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 28 June and 12 July 2020

    REPUBLIC of POLAND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 28 June and 12 July 2020

    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF POLAND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 28 June and 12 July 2020 ODIHR Special Election Assessment Mission Final Report Warsaw 23 September 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................ 3 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 4 IV. ELECTORAL SYSTEM AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK .......................................................... 5 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................... 7 VI. VOTER REGISTRATION ........................................................................................................... 9 VII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION ............................................................................................... 11 VIII. CAMPAIGN ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................. 12 IX. CAMPAIGN FINANCE .............................................................................................................. 15 X. MEDIA .......................................................................................................................................... 18 A. MEDIA LANDSCAPE .............................................................................................................
  • Rzeczpospolita Polska

    Rzeczpospolita Polska

    Biuro Instytucji Demokratycznych i Praw Człowieka (ODIHR) RZECZPOSPOLITA POLSKA WYBORY PREZYDENCKIE 28 czerwca i 12 lipca 2020 r. Misja specjalna obserwacji wyborów ODIHR Sprawozdanie końcowe Warszawa 23 września 2020 r. SPIS TREŚCI I. STRESZCZENIE ................................................................................................................... 1 II. WSTĘP I PODZIĘKOWANIA ............................................................................................ 4 III. TŁO POLITYCZNE .............................................................................................................. 4 IV. SYSTEM WYBORCZY I RAMY PRAWNE ..................................................................... 5 V. ADMINISTRACJA WYBORCZA ....................................................................................... 7 VI. REJESTRACJA WYBORCÓW .......................................................................................... 9 VII. REJESTRACJA KANDYDATÓW .................................................................................... 12 VIII. OTOCZENIE KAMPANII ................................................................................................. 13 IX. FINANSOWANIE KAMPANII ......................................................................................... 16 X. MEDIA .................................................................................................................................. 19 A. ŚRODOWISKO MEDIALNE .............................................................................................
  • The International Embrace of Parler by Right-Wing and Populist Parties

    The International Embrace of Parler by Right-Wing and Populist Parties

    The International Embrace of Parler by Right-Wing and Populist Parties John Chrobak IERES Occasional Papers, no. 10, January 2021 “Transnational History of the Far Right” Series The International Embrace of Parler by Right-Wing and Populist Parties John Chrobak IERES Occasional Papers, no. 10, January 2021 “Transnational History of the Far Right” Series Photo Cover: by John Chrobak created with mapchart.net licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 ©IERES2021 Transnational History of the Far Right A Collective Research Project led by Marlene Laruelle At a time when global political dynamics seem to be moving in favor of illiberal regimes around the world, this research project seeks to fill in some of the blank pages in the contemporary history of the far right, with a particular focus on the transnational dimensions of far-right movements in the broader Europe/Eurasia region. www.historyofthefarright.org/ John Chrobak is a Program Coordinator at the Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES) at the George Washington University. He has an MA in International Affairs from GW’s Elliott School of International Affairs with a specialization in U.S. Foreign Policy and Eurasian Politics. His work has focused particularly on regional politics and security in Eurasia as well as the use of social media to manipulate and spread information for political influence. He has previously worked at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) and at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensics Research Lab (DFRLab). Note: Parler’s role as a hub for far-right and conspiratorial networks has most recently come to light due to the platform’s role in enabling these groups to radicalize individuals and organize for action.