ARCHAEOLOGY Branch
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Carnarvon Station Reserve QLD 2014, a Bush Blitz Survey Report
Carnarvon Station Reserve Queensland 7 – 17 October 2014 Bush Blitz species discovery program Carnarvon Station Reserve, Queensland 7–17 October 2014 What is Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a multi-million dollar partnership between the Australian Government, BHP Billiton Sustainable Communities and Earthwatch Australia to document plants and animals in selected properties across Australia. This innovative partnership harnesses the expertise of many of Australia’s top scientists from museums, herbaria, universities, and other institutions and organisations across the country. Abbreviations ABRS Australian Biological Resources Study ALA Atlas of Living Australia ANH Australian National Herbarium ANIC Australian National Insect Collection CANBR Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research (Australian National Herbarium) EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NCA Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) QM Queensland Museum Page 2 of 44 Carnarvon Station Reserve, Queensland 7–17 October 2014 Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted at Carnarvon Station Reserve in Central Queensland between 7 and 17 October 2014. The reserve sits within the Brigalow Belt bioregion, which is one of the most extensive, fertile and well- watered areas in Northern Australia. The vast majority of this bioregion has been cleared of vegetation for agriculture. This former cattle station has been a Bush Heritage property since 2001 and encompasses a valley flanked by mountains. Past grazing has impacted the vegetation of the valleys and plains but not the rugged hills. The reserve protects a wide range of habitats and at least 10 threatened species. The lowland woodlands and bluegrass downs that cover much of the valley floor are important additions to the rugged ranges protected in neighbouring Carnarvon National Park. -
1:1 Aims Chapter One Introduction
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1:1 AIMS During 1968-69 the Department of Aboriginal and Island Affairs and the Queensland ~fuseum received many reports alleging deliberate vandalism to Aboriginal art and burial sites both within the confines of Carnarvon National Park and on cattle stations adjacent to its western, southern and eastern boundaries. Consequently in August 1969 the writer in his capacity as a Warden under the Aboriginal Relics Act carried out a preliminary inspection of Aboriginal sites on the upper Warrego and upper Maranoa rivers. As a result members of the Specialists advisory committee set up under the relics act informally approached the Queensland ~~seum to undertake a survey of the region. During this same period I had applied for admission to candidature for the M.A. degree at the University of New England. Coincidentally my future supervisor suggested a survey of the Carnarvon rock art. The subsequent official survey was originally envisaged as a twofold exercise: Ci) to reconnoitre, locate and record as rapidly and accurately as possible Aboriginal parietal art sites in the Carnarvon Range and the Upper Maranoa river region as far west as the Chesterton Range Cii) to observe significant differences or similarities in technique, style, form and content of the parietal art in these two adjacent drainage systems, which rise in the same central highlands complex, but are physically separated by the Great Dividing Range. 2. The aims of the survey were: (i) to report on the physical condition, state of preservation of the art and evidence of vandalism at the sites located. Further, to recommend to the Advisory Committee those sites of sufficient importance to be protected under Section 13 of the Aboriginal Relics Act; (ii) to present that art as archaeological data of sufficient clarity to permit quantitative and qualitative analysis in order to facilitate interpretation; and to evaluate it as representative of a potential regional art "style" based in the southern central Queensland highland region. -
A) Marine Status
Status of marine and coastal natural assets in the Fitzroy Basin September 2015 Prepared by Johanna Johnson, Jon Brodie and Nicole Flint for the Fitzroy Basin Association Incorporated Version 6: 01 November 2015 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Coastal natural assets: status and trends ....................................................................................... 5 2.1. Estuaries .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2. Coastal wetlands ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Islands and cays .................................................................................................................... 12 3. Marine assets: status and trends .................................................................................................. 14 3.1. Coral reefs ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.2. Seagrass meadows ................................................................................................................ 21 3.3. Species of conservation interest .......................................................................................... -
Revised List of Queensland Birds
Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement 0 19. 1984 Revised List ofQueensland Birds G.M.Storr ,~ , , ' > " Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 19 I $ I,, 1 > Revised List oflQueensland Birds G. M. Storr ,: i, Perth 1984 'j t ,~. i, .', World List Abbreviation: . Rec. West. Aust. Mus. Suppl. no. 19 Cover Palm Cockatoo (Probosciger aterrimus), drawn by Jill Hollis. © Western Australian Museum 1984 I ISBN 0 7244 8765 4 Printed and Published by the Western Australian Museum, j Francis Street, Perth 6000, Western Australia. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction. ...................................... 5 List of birds. ...................................... 7 Gazetteer ....................................... .. 179 3 INTRODUCTION In 1967 I began to search the literature for information on Queensland birds their distribution, ecological status, relative abundance, habitat preferences, breeding season, movements and taxonomy. In addition much unpublished information was received from Mrs H.B. Gill, Messrs J.R. Ford, S.A. Parker, R.L. Pink, R.K. Carruthers, L. Neilsen, D. Howe, C.A.C. Cameron, Bro. Matthew Heron, Dr D.L. Serventy and the late W.E. Alexander. These data formed the basis of the List of Queensland birds (Stort 1973, Spec. Pubis West. Aust. Mus. No. 5). During the last decade the increase in our knowledge of Queensland birds has been such as to warrant a re-writing of the List. Much of this progress has been due to three things: (1) survey work by J.R. Ford, A. Gieensmith and N.C.H. Reid in central Queensland and southern Cape York Peninsula (Ford et al. 1981, Sunbird 11: 58-70), (2) research into the higher categories ofclassification, especially C.G. -
Chapter 14 – Surface Water
CONTENTS 14. SURFACE WATER 14-1 14.1. Description of environmental values – hydrology 14-1 14.1.1. Regulatory framework 14-1 14.1.2. Assessment methodology 14-3 14.1.3. Catchment description 14-6 14.1.4. Surface water flow patterns 14-9 14.1.5. Flooding 14-20 14.1.6. Current water resource development 14-29 14.1.7. Pipeline 14-37 14.2. Potential impacts and mitigation measures - hydrology 14-38 14.2.1. Construction 14-38 14.2.2. Surface water flow under operations 14-41 14.2.3. Flooding 14-72 14.3. Cumulative risk 14-81 14.3.2. Impact assessment and residual risks 14-87 14.4. Summary - hydrology 14-92 14.5. Description of environmental values – fluvial geomorphology 14-92 14.5.1. Methodology 14-92 14.5.2. Dam and surrounds 14-95 14.5.3. Pipeline 14-113 14.5.4. Associated infrastructure 14-114 14.6. Potential impacts and mitigation measures – fluvial geomorphology 14-115 14.6.1. Methodology 14-115 14.6.2. Dam and surrounds 14-115 14.6.3. Pipeline 14-121 14.6.4. Associated infrastructure 14-123 14.6.5. Impact assessment and residual risks 14-123 14.7. Cumulative risks 14-134 14.8. Summary – fluvial geomorphology 14-134 NATHAN DAM AND PIPELINES EIS PAGE i TABLES Table 14-1 Streamflow reporting sites (refer to Figure 14-1) 14-3 Table 14-2 Catchments draining into the Nathan Dam pool 14-9 Table 14-3 Fitzroy catchment gauge flow statistics 14-12 Table 14-4 Fitzroy catchment modelled flow statistics 14-13 Table 14-5 Colour code for model results 14-18 Table 14-6 Non-mandatory seasonal base flow results for the Full Entitlement scenario 14-19 -
Historical Nutrient Usage in Coastal Queensland River Catchments Adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park
RESEARCH PUBLICATION No. 40 Historical Nutrient Usage in Coastal Queensland River Catchments Adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park J. S. Pulsford March 1993 A REPORT TO THE GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK AUTHORITY © Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority 1996 ISSN 1037-1508 ISBN 0 642 23011 0 Published July 1996 by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority The opinions expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. National library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Pulsford, j. S. (jim 5.). Historical nutrient usage in coastal Queensland river catchments adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Bibliography. ISBN 0 642 23011 O. 1. Water - Nitrogen content - Queensland - Great Barrier Reef. 2. Water - Queensland - Great Barrier Reef Phosphorus content. 3. Fertilizers - Environmental aspects. I. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (Australia). (Series: Research publication (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (Australia)); no. 40). 333.916409943 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority PO Box 1379 Townsville Qld 4810 Telephone (077) 500 700 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. METHOD OF ALLOCATION OF NUTRIENTS TO BASINS 5 2.1 Queensland Data " 5 2.2 Statistical Divisions 5 2.3 Local Authority Areas 6 2.4 Using Australian Bureau of Statistics Data to Obtain Nutrient Usages 7 2.5 Fertilizer Indust,)' Data 8 2.6 Drainage Basins 9 2.7 Allocation of Nutrients to Basins 10 3. NUTRIENT USAGE IN SOME EASTERN QUEENSLAND BASINS 12 3. I Nitrogen Usage 12 3.2 PhosphoI1ls Usage 17 3.3 1990 Nitrogen and Phosphorus Usage Relative to Basin Areas 24 3.4 1990 Nitrogen and Phosphorus Usage Relative to Basin Run-off. -
Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage T Go Back to Contents Enter Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage Cultural Non-Indigenous © James Thian Photography © James
Enter Go back to contents T. NON-INDIGENOUS CULTURAL HERItaGE T Non-indigenous cultural heritage © James Thian Photography © James Santos GLNG Gas Field Development Project Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage Assessment October 2014 Converge Heritage + Community Contact details are: Benjamin Gall Converge Heritage + Community ABN: 71 366 535 889 Po Box 333, The Gap, 4061 Tel: (07) 33668488 Email: [email protected] Copyright © 2014 Document Verification Project Central Qld Santos GLNG GFD EIS Project Number 13097C Document Title Non-Indigenous Cultural Heritage Assessment, Santos GLNG Gas Field Development Project, Central and Southern Queensland (October 2014) File Location C: Projects/13097C Central Qld Santos GLNG GFD/Reporting Client URS For Santos Santos GLNG GFD Project– NICH Technical Report | i Executive Summary Converge Heritage + Community (Converge) has been commissioned to prepare a report that details baseline information, results and recommendations of the non-Indigenous cultural heritage (NICH) assessment for the Santos GLNG Gas Field Development Project (the GFD Project). This technical report will inform the heritage sections of the environmental impact statement (EIS). The Terms of reference (ToR) for the GFD Project require that direct, indirect and cumulative impacts are fully examined and addressed and that the GFD Project should be based on sound environmental protection and management criteria. The approach for this investigation was developed from the requirements of the ToR and the relevant industry best practice guidelines. It also takes into consideration the incremental and dispersed nature of the gas field development over a project life exceeding more than 30 years. The aims of the historical cultural heritage investigation were to: Address the ToR. -
Buffel Grass Grazing on National Parks Carnarvon National Park Palmerston Range Walk Collared Delma the National Park Experience
Magazine of National Parks Association of Queensland buffel grass grazing on national parks carnarvon national park palmerston range walk collared delma the national park experience Issue 2 April-May 2015 1 Welcome to the Contents April/May edition of Welcome to Protected 2 Protected Buffel grass 3 Parks into Paddocks 6 Michelle Prior, NPAQ President Carnarvon National Park 8 Protected symbolises both the evolution of NPAQ over its 85 year Tracks near the Palmerston Hwy 10 history, and the essence of its founding Collared Delma 12 principles. Brought into being on the The National Park Experience 13 15th April 1930 by two ‘idealists of What’s On 14 the obstinate kind’, Romeo Lahey and Arthur Groom, NPAQ sought to fill an Letter to the Editor 15 important gap - there being ‘no body of public opinion...organised to combat the influences which were operating Council against the best interests of National President Michelle Prior Parks’. Vice Presidents Tony O’Brien So inspired by nature’s beauty, NPAQ Athol Lester founding members wished to work Hon Secretary Debra Marwedel towards protecting it. Around this Asst Hon Secret Yvonne Parsons time, community organisations were Hon Treasurer Graham Riddell the primary drives for protected area Councillors Julie Hainsworth proposals. Geoff Lowes Peter Ogilvie Today, there is a plethora of Richard Proudfoot environmental, conservation Des Whybird volunteering, bushwalking, outdoor Mike Wilke activities, nature experiences and travel organisations. World Conventions, national and state Staff legislation, conservation science, and Paul Donatiu government departments staffed with Anna Tran dedicated professionals fulfil many of Jeannie Rice NPAQ early roles. -
Carnarvon National Park Management Plan
Southern Brigalow Belt Biogeographic Region Carnarvon National Park Management plan June 2005 Summary This management plan provides the framework and guidelines on how Carnarvon National Park will be managed. It sets out the considerations, outcomes and strategies that are proposed to form the basis on which day-to-day management decisions are made. Acknowledgements Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service staff prepared this management plan. Although the principal author is Claire Grant, the preparation of this management plan has been made possible only by the contributions of a great number of people. The involvement and support of organisations and the public who contributed to the plan, the respective Aboriginal people and Land Councils, and adjoining landholders who contributed information and general assistance is acknowledged and appreciated. Cover photographs: Aerial view of Carnarvon Gorge. Photo: EPA/Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service. Disclaimer This plan does not intend to affect, diminish or extinguish Native Title and associated rights. Note that implementation of some management strategies might need to be phased in according to availability of resources. ISSN 1037-4698 © The State of Queensland. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service. Enquiries should be addressed to PO Box 15155, City East, BRISBANE QLD 4002. -
Appendix N2 Nature Conservation Gas Transmission Pipeline
FINAL REPORT Santos GLNG Pipeline Fauna Assessment (Gas Transmission Pipeline) Prepared for Santos Ltd Santos House Level 14 60 Edward Street Brisbane QLD 4000 11 February 2009 42626220 C:\Documents and Settings\rxborge0\My Documents\URS Report front cover for pdf.doc SANTOS GLNG PIPELINE FAUNA ASSESSMENT Project Manager: URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 16, 240 Queen Street Brisbane, QLD 4000 GPO Box 302, QLD 4001 Dan Simmons Australia Associate Environmental T: 61 7 3243 2111 Scientist F: 61 7 3243 2199 Project Director: Chris Pigott Senior Principal Author: Date: 11 February 2009 Reference: Draft Santos GLNG Pipeline Status: Fauna Assessment Final Angus McLeod Senior Ecologist Prepared for Santos, 11 February 2009 SANTOS GLNG PIPELINE FAUNA ASSESSMENT Table of Contents Table of Contents ES Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Aim and Objectives.............................................................................................. 1 1.3 Review of Existing Information ..................................................................................... 1 1.4 Target Species................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Nomenclature -
Libby Smith, 'Carnarvon Station: a History of European Settlement Since 1863'
Carnarvon Station: A history of European settlement since 1863 Libby Smith, 2003 1 `lkqbkqp= Page Introduction 1 Chapter 1 The Early Years 2 Chapter 2 The Tyson Era 5 Chapter 3 John Collins & Sons 9 Chapter 4 The Kenniff Story 19 Chapter 5 1928-1963 Consolidation with Babbiloora 23 Chapter 6 The Last 40 Years 27 Chapter 7 The Australian Bush Heritage Fund 35 Notes ^`hkltibadbjbkqp= There were a large number of people who contributed their memories and knowledge of Carnarvon Station and the area of central Queensland in which it is situated. My thanks to previous owners of the property – Henry Harkins, Doug and Karen Twist, Terry Rauchle, Lionel Hart and Tony and Thea Wearing. Many others also helped - Bruce and Jane Cosh, Jeanette Godfery and Grant Godfery, Bill Stamford of the National Parks & Wildlife Service in Roma, Des Mallet, Dan Thomas, Dave Hagger, Maxine Thomas, Blanche McNelley, Gordon Young, Betty Cameron and Patricia Johnson. I would also like to mention the invaluable assistance I was offered in researching the land tenure records of Carnarvon by Toni Ferguson of the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Charleville and Bill Kitson of Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane. Zita Derholm, author of T.Y.S.O.N., a detailed account of the life of James Tyson, generously answered my questions and looked up references. Introduction fkqolar`qflk= In 2001 the Australian Bush Heritage Fund purchased It is worth noting that Carnarvon’s history, for much of the first Carnarvon Station in central Queensland in order to protect its one hundred years of its occupation as a pastoral lease, is shared outstanding natural values. -
South West NRM Plan 2015–2025 Achieving Sustainable Landscapes for Rural Communities
South West NRM Plan 2015–2025 Achieving sustainable landscapes for rural communities VERSION 3-1 | April 2016 | South West NRM Ltd. South West NRM Plan 2015–2025 - Achieving sustainable landscapes for rural communities 1 Copyright South West Natural Resource Management (NRM) Ltd. 2016. This publication has been developed by South West NRM Ltd. To the extent permitted by law, South West NRM Ltd excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including, but not limited to, all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part of in whole) and any information or material contained in it. Information and agency names were correct at the time of printing (2016). Map disclaimer: 1) Copyright – South West NRM Ltd (2011) in consideration of South West NRM Ltd permitting use of the Licensed data, South West NRM Ltd gives no warranty in relation to the data (including accuracy, reliability, completeness or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including consequential damage) relating to any use of data. 2) Based on Cadastral Data provided with the permission of the Department of Environment and Resource Management, current as of 2011. The maps in this document are not to be sold or re-made as part of a commercial product. The property boundaries shown on this plan are approximate only. They are not an accurate representation of the legal boundaries. Cover Photo courtesy Cathy