DOCSLIB.ORG

Los Espacios De La Antropología En La Obra De Robert Lehmann-Nitsche, 1894-1938 Ballestero, Diego Alberto Doctor En Ciencias Naturales

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Los Espacios De La Antropología En La Obra De Robert Lehmann-Nitsche, 1894-1938 Ballestero, Diego Alberto Doctor En Ciencias Naturales Naturalis Repositorio Institucional Universidad Nacional de La Plata http://naturalis.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo Los espacios de la antropología en la obra de Robert Lehmann-Nitsche, 1894-1938 Ballestero, Diego Alberto Doctor en Ciencias Naturales Dirección: Podgorny, Irina Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo 2014 Acceso en: http://naturalis.fcnym.unlp.edu.ar/id/20140424001338 Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Los espacios de la antropología en la obra de Robert Lehmann-Nitsche, 1894-1938 Diego Alberto Ballestero Directora: Dra. Irina Podgorny Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo – UNLP 2013 Tomo I Resumen El propósito de esta Tesis Doctoral es el análisis de las condiciones de posibilidad para las prácticas y el trabajo antropológico en la Argentina de fines del siglo XIX y principios del siglo XX. Especialmente, se examina la cultura material, las redes de circulación de información, los espacios de encuentro así como las prácticas de observación y registro, a través del análisis de las producciones del antropólogo alemán Robert Lehmann-Nitsche. Se busca relevar cómo se constituyó el “trabajo de campo” a través de los distintos espacios de encuentro y actores que mediaron/intervinieron entre los objetos de estudio elegido, los distintos espacios involucrados y los sectores científicos. Asimismo se busca dar cuenta de las estrategias para obtener información y colecciones así como los distintos circuitos en los que participaron los objetos o individuos estudiados, tal como ferias o exposiciones. Estas cuestiones permiten vislumbrar diferentes aspectos de cómo trabajaron los científicos pero también hablan de la naturaleza colectiva de la producción de conocimientos y de las interacciones con ámbitos no académicos Agradecimientos Primeramente quiero agradecer a mi Directora, Irina Podgorny, por haberme dado la oportunidad de llevar adelante este proyecto con entera libertad. Por brindarme constantemente su guía, su sincero juicio crítico, sus exhaustivas y valiosas correcciones, y su enorme paciencia. A Miguel Saghessi y Marta Roa por haberme abierto las puertas del mundo de la investigación y por su constante apoyo a lo largo de los primeros años. En distintos momentos de esta investigación Silvia Ametrano, Gustavo Politis, Margaret Lopes, Nelia Dias, Barbara Göbel han sabido brindarme su apoyo a través de cartas de presentación a becas, apoyo institucional, sugerencias bibliográficas, y discusión de datos e ideas relevantes que han enriquecido enormemente el resultado final de esta investigación. Mis compañeros de equipo: Máximo Farro, Susana García, Tatiana Kelly, Andrea Pegoraro, Alejandra Pupio y Alejandro Martínez merecen un especial agradecimiento. Por haber contribuido a mi formación académica, soportando estoicamente la lectura de mis primeros trabajos. Por repetir el mismo heroicismo al leer versiones de los borradores de esta tesis, contribuyendo con ideas fundamentales. Pero más que nada por haber sabido estar en los momentos más necesarios de la redacción de este trabajo. Especialmente quiero agradecer al Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schäffner de la cátedra de Historia del Conocimiento y la Cultura del Instituto de Estudios Culturales de la Universidad Humboldt de Berlín. Gracias a él pude realizar una estadía de investigación de 2 años en Berlín, pudiendo acceder a innumerables espacios de formación científica y académica que siempre pensé lejanos. Su paciencia, su erudición y fundamentalmente su enorme calidad humana han sido pilares fundamentales en este proceso. Al grupo de Berlín: Liliana Gómez-Popescu, Ricardo Cedeño Montaña, Nadia Guevara, José Muñoz, y Fabio Schillaci, por escuchar ideas, corregir versiones previas de este trabajo, sugerencias y el aliento constante. En este sentido quiero destacar la invalorable ayuda y las pacientes lecturas de Settimio Pessuoto quien, junto a Lutz Matsche, supieron acompañarme desde mis primeros días en Berlín, y por saber estar. Asimismo debo agradecer a los empleados de las diversas bibliotecas, institutos, bibliotecas y fondos documentales por su paciencia y predisposición al momento de ayudarme a encontrar gran parte del material utilizados en este trabajo. Mi agradecimiento a: la Biblioteca del Museo de La Plata, la Biblioteca de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata, la Biblioteca Nacional, el Archivo Histórico de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, el Archivo General de la Nación, el Archivo del Museo Etnográfico de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. En Alemania debo agradecer especialmente a los empleados de: el Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut de Berlín, el Ethnologisches Museum Berlin Staatliche Sammlungen Berlin Preußischer Kulturbesitz, la Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie, Ethnologie und Urgeschichte, el Geheimes Staatsarchiv Preußischer Kulturbesitz Berlin, y finalmente el Universitätsarchiv der Humboldt- Universität Berlin. Esta investigación fue apoyada institucionalmente por una Beca de Investigación Científica de tipo Inicial otorgada por la Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica de la Argentina, financiando la investigación entre los años 2008 y 2010. Posteriormente gracias a una Beca Sandwich del Servicio Alemán de Intercambio Académico (DAAD) se pudo realizar una estadía de investigación en la ciudad de Berlín entre los años 2010 y 2012. Asimismo, esta investigación se enmarcó en los proyectos “El mapa de una controversia científica: los debates sobre la antigüedad de la formación pampeana, 1880-1925” (PIP 5675); “El comercio de datos y artefactos en la cultura de las ciencias de los Siglos XIX y XX” (PIP-CONICET 0116), y “Cultura Material y medios técnicos” (PICT 2005 ET 32111), dirigidos por la Dra. Irina Podgorny. A mis amigos de una parte del mundo: Matías Fortunato, Julián Tabuenca, Rada Castillo, Ana Marchetti, Pía Arnedillo, Nahuel González, Alfredo Leaden, Natalia Badino, Solana Vila Moret, Lili, Griselda Späth, Diana Ramos, Mailen de Santis, Mery Braco, Emiliana Carricondo, Gisela Tissone, Matias Ferraro, Ariel Raggio, Federico Biancuzzo. Por haber estado siempre, por haber escuchado (aguantando la risa) aquellas cosas “raras” que estudiaba, y por saber perdonar todas mis llegadas tarde. A los amigos que el estudio de las cosas “raras” me permitió conocer: Gisela Ferraro, Ezequiel Meza Hidalgo, Alexander Araya López, Orlando Venegas Valencia, José Romero, Luis Espinales Delgado, Diego Gormaz Lobo, Claudia Andres, Sabine Gabriele, Enrique Sulbaran Romero, Yarua Jaimes, Mira Cecile Merks, Vanesa Sepulveda Medialdea, Maine Ochoa, Claudia, María Virginia Carrero, Elisa Meza Vilalón y Liliana Zerpa. Por que me acompañaron en la etapa final de este camino e iniciaron uno nuevo. A mi madre Miriam, a mis hermanas María y Letiziá, a mi hermano Ezequiel. Por su amor y su apoyo incondicional. Por creer fielmente en mí en todos estos años. Nada hubiese sido posible sin ellos. A Annika, por su paciencia, por su ayuda, por su enorme conocimiento y por haber soportado siempre con una sonrisa las etapas más intensas de la redacción de este trabajo. Por que gracias al estudio de las cosas “raras” pude conocerla. Pero fundamentalmente por su amor, por su ternura y la enorme alegría de estos años. Finalmente a mi mejor amigo, mi mentor, mi guía y ejemplo: a mi padre Alberto A la memoria de mi padre A Miriam, María, Ezequiel y Letizía A Annika Índice General Tomo I Introducción general……………………………………………………………………01 Algunas cuestiones teórico- metodológicas……………………………………………09 Robert Lehmann-Nitsche………………………………………………………………17 1. La Antropología entre fines del siglo XIX y principios del siglo XX ........................... 28 2. Caos y orden en la Antropología Argentina…………………………………………… 65 3. El estudio de las colecciones osteológicas del Museo de la Plata .................................. 72 4. La observación sobre individuos vivos: Antropometría y Somatología ........................ 94 5. El estudio de las tradiciones populares ........................................................................ 107 6. La Antropología y las excursiones al campo ............................................................... 150 7. Redes de cooperación ................................................................................................... 190 8. La enseñanza de la Antropología ................................................................................. 222 9. Congresos y sociedades científicas .............................................................................. 255 10. Consideraciones Finales ............................................................................................... 297 Tomo II Bibliografía y Anexos 1 Introducción general El objetivo general de esta tesis es analizar el desarrollo de los espacios de la antropología argentina entre fines del siglo XIX y principios del siglo XX. Como ha señalado Bruno Latour, este tipo de análisis implica desentrañar las redes institucionales que envuelven la práctica científica, a fin de poder historizar y contextualizar un objeto en particular que, estabilizado y estandarizado en tiempo y espacio, cobra existencia como objeto científico1. En este sentido Hans-Jörg Rheinberger ha remarcado la necesidad de preguntarse por “[…] the peculiar historical character of scientific objects, or epistemic things and that of our historical narratives, what it means to speak of scientific objects and what it means to organize our stories around them”2. Los espacios
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Karl Jordan: a Life in Systematics
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Kristin Renee Johnson for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History of SciencePresented on July 21, 2003. Title: Karl Jordan: A Life in Systematics Abstract approved: Paul Lawrence Farber Karl Jordan (1861-1959) was an extraordinarily productive entomologist who influenced the development of systematics, entomology, and naturalists' theoretical framework as well as their practice. He has been a figure in existing accounts of the naturalist tradition between 1890 and 1940 that have defended the relative contribution of naturalists to the modem evolutionary synthesis. These accounts, while useful, have primarily examined the natural history of the period in view of how it led to developments in the 193 Os and 40s, removing pre-Synthesis naturalists like Jordan from their research programs, institutional contexts, and disciplinary homes, for the sake of synthesis narratives. This dissertation redresses this picture by examining a naturalist, who, although often cited as important in the synthesis, is more accurately viewed as a man working on the problems of an earlier period. This study examines the specific problems that concerned Jordan, as well as the dynamic institutional, international, theoretical and methodological context of entomology and natural history during his lifetime. It focuses upon how the context in which natural history has been done changed greatly during Jordan's life time, and discusses the role of these changes in both placing naturalists on the defensive among an array of new disciplines and attitudes in science, and providing them with new tools and justifications for doing natural history. One of the primary intents of this study is to demonstrate the many different motives and conditions through which naturalists came to and worked in natural history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Organism: Carl Vogt on Animals and States in the 1840S and 50S Lynn K. Nyhart* *Program in the History of Science
    1 The Political Organism: Carl Vogt on Animals and States in the 1840s and 50s Lynn K. Nyhart* *Program in the History of Science, Medicine, and Technology, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI 53706, [email protected] ABSTRACT: How do the discourses of biology and politics interact? This article uses the case of Carl Vogt (1817-1895), a German zoologist, physiologist, and radical political activist in the German revolutions of 1848-49, to examine the traffic across the discourses before, during, and after the revolutions. It argues that the key metaphors of the “state-as-organism” (used largely by political theorists) and the “organism-as-state” (used mainly by biologists) did different work for each group in the 1840s and 1850s. Vogt himself was the rare individual who actively played with both metaphors, in defense of both his radical political views and his materialist biology. I examine especially closely his scholarly biological studies of siphonophores—marine invertebrates that looked like single organisms but were generally agreed to be collections of individuals (“states” or “colonies”), and his use of this creature for political satire after the revolution failed. More broadly, while attention to the organism-as-state peaked in the early1850s, the state-as-organism metaphor gained new possibilities. Whereas earlier it generally referred to an idealist or “ethical” meaning of “organism,” in the 1850s a new, “realistic” interpretation came onto the political scene, bearing a more strictly biological meaning of the term. The article ends with a brief analysis of the asymmetries between the two metaphors and their positions within nineteenth-century German natural science and politics.
    [Show full text]
  • The So-Called 'Eclipse of Darwinism'
    Descended from Darwin Insights into the History of Evolutionary Studies, 1900–1970 Joe Cain and Michael Ruse, Editors American Philosophical Society Philadelphia • 2009 TRANSACTIONS of the AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY Held at Philadelphia For Promoting Useful Knowledge Volume 99, Part 1 Copyright © 2009 by the American Philosophical Society for its Transactions series, Volume 99. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-60618-991-7 US ISSN: 0065-9746 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the Library of Congress. Cain and Ruse. 2009. Descended from Darwin (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society) Chapter 1 The So-Called Eclipse of Darwinism Mark A. Largent Introduction In discussing the emergence and development of evolutionary biology, historians of biology typically divide the nineteenth and twentieth centuries into four eras. The first, the pre-Darwinian period, came prior to publication of the Origin of Species in 1859, and it includes evolutionary theorizing by figures like Lamarck and Chambers. The second period focused on the reception and reaction to Darwin’s work by the public, religious authorities, and natural scientists. This period lasted from 1859 to about 1880 and is best characterized by works that systematically examine the recep- tion of Darwin’s ideas across different countries (Glick, 1974). Beginning about 1880 and lasting through most of the 1930s is a period widely described as the “eclipse of Darwinism” or the “eclipse of Darwin.”1 Biologists and historians of biology alike have described this period as one during which many theories competed for status. During these years, Darwinian evolutionary theory was supposedly obscured, and ultimately discarded, as speculative and old-fashioned natural history.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking a Syntype of the Australian Skink Anomalopus Leuckartii
    66 (2): 169 – 177 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2016. 20.10.2016 Tracking a syntype of the Australian skink Anomalopus leuckartii (Weinland, 1862): ‘lost’ treasures in the Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden highlight the importance of reassessing and safe­ guarding natural history collections Sven Mecke 1 *, Felix Mader 2, Max Kieckbusch 1, Hinrich Kaiser 3, Wolfgang Böhme 4 & Raffael Ernst 5 1 AG Evolution und Systematik der Tiere und Zoologische Sammlung Marburg, Fachbereich Biologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl-von- Frisch-Straße 8, 35032 Marburg, Germany — 2 Janusstraße 5, 93051 Regensburg, Germany —3 Department of Biology, Victor Valley College, 18422 Bear Valley Road, Victorville, California 92395, USA; and Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smith- sonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA — 4 Sektion Herpetologie, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauer- allee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany — 5 Sektion Herpetologie, Museum für Tierkunde, Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Königsbrücker Landstraße 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany — *Corresponding author; meckes(at)staff.uni-marburg.de Accepted 15.vii.2016. Published online at www.senckenberg.de / vertebrate-zoology on 28.ix.2016. Abstract We here report the rediscovery of a type specimen of the Australian skink Anomalopus leuckartii (WEINLAND, 1862) in the Museum of Zoology (Museum für Tierkunde), Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden (accession number MTKD 10205), heretofore pre- sumed lost during World War II. Eidonomic data for the specimen conform to the original species description, and combined with the specimen’s history, we are able to unequivocally identify it as part of the original syntype series. WEINLAND’S description was based on two specimens, one of which does indeed appear to be lost.
    [Show full text]
  • William Ernest Castle, American Geneticist
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF H. Terry Taylor for the degree of Master of Arts in General Science (History of Science) presented onAugust 17, 1983 Title: William Ernest Castle: American Geneticist. A Case-Study in the Impact of the Mendelian Research Program Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: In their modern context questions of heredity have come to be closely aligned with theories of evolution because all such theories require the presence of heritable variation. Thus the need for an understanding of a source of variation and a mechanism for its in- heritance became very apparent with the general acceptance of organic evolution among biologists in the 1870's. Yet no one theory of evolution or of heredity became generally accepted until the modern synthesis of the 1930's. This thesis ad- dresses the question of how this modern synthetic theory gained wide- spread acceptance and seeks to answer it by studying the development of a theory of heredity both before and after the rediscovery of Mendel ca. 1900. Those factors making possible the rediscovery in terms of the developments in heredity and evolution are treated as a background for the reception of Mendel. Theories discussed include those of Charles Darwin, August Weismann, Hugo de Vries and the American neo- Lamarckians. These theories also serve as a background against which to see the life and work of William Ernest Castle. This man was trained during the 1890's, receiving his Ph.D. under E.L. Mark at Harvard. In 1900 he became one of the very first to begin Mendelian experiments on animal material, working with small animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Type M. Calffornfca Ashm.) the Scape and Less Than Half the Length of The
    .PS YCIt.E. [May 89:. 13 and anal plates, milk white from spiracles joints very short together not longer than to feet, extending higher on joints 6-6 and the scape or less than one fourth the length 11-12, mottled. End of joint 13 swollen of the third joint; clypeus triangularly pro- above, light brown; joint 3 a little enlarged duced in the middle; claws bifid; all tibiae dorsally. In the natural position of rest, very spinous, hind tibiae with 4 long spurs curled spirally around a leaf petiole, the two beneath between middle and apex largest white patches adjoin each other. Meg,axyela Ashm. Enters the earth without ultimate stage. (type X. major Cress.) Single brooded, feeding only on immature Antennae I2-jointed, the nine terminal joints leaves. much shortened, together much shorter Staten Island, N. Y., June I; Bellport, than the third joint; both transverse radial Long Island; Bedford Park, N. Y., May 25; nervures originating from the second cubital Fort Lee and Plainfield, N. J., May i6 (the cell; clypeus and tibiae as in ]/Zeaxyela, youngest one). claws with a large erect tooth before middle Pleuroneura Konow. Table ofgezera of Xyelidae. 3" Antennae I2-jointed, the nine terminal joints slender, lengthened, together as long (By W. H. Ashmead.) or longer than the third joint; claws long, I. Front wings with the intercostal vein slender, with a very minute, nearly obsolete uniting with the subcostal; hind wings with tooth beneath a little beyond the middle 4 one complete submarginal and one discoidal 4" Front Wings with both transverse radial cell 3 nervures originating from the second cubital Front wings with the intercostal vein sepa- cell, rarely with the second transverse radial rated, distinct from the subcostal; hind interstitial; clypeus with a median ridge wings with two complete submarginal cells which is slightly extended beyond the an- and one discoidal cell 2 terior margin, but scarcely triangularly pro- 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Individuals at the Center of Biology: Rudolf Leuckart's Polymorphismus
    Journal of the History of Biology (2011) 44:373–443 Ó Springer 2011 DOI 10.1007/s10739-011-9268-6 Individuals at the Center of Biology: Rudolf Leuckart’s Polymorphismus der Individuen and the Ongoing Narrative of Parts and Wholes. With an Annotated Translation LYNN K. NYHART Department of the History of Science University of Wisconsin-Madison 1225 Linden Drive Madison, WI 53706 USA E-mail: [email protected] SCOTT LIDGARD Department of Geology Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive Chicago, IL 60605 USA E-mail: slidgard@fieldmuseum.org Abstract. Rudolf Leuckart’s 1851 pamphlet Ueber den Polymorphismus der Individuen (On the polymorphism of individuals) stood at the heart of naturalists’ discussions on biological individuals, parts and wholes in mid-nineteenth-century Britain and Europe. Our analysis, which accompanies the first translation of this pamphlet into English, situates Leuckart’s contribution to these discussions in two ways. First, we present it as part of a complex conceptual knot involving not only individuality and the understand- ing of compound organisms, but also the alternation of generations, the division of labor in nature, and the possibility of finding general laws of the organic world. Leuckart’s pamphlet is important as a novel attempt to give order to the strands of this knot. It also solved a set of key biological problems in a way that avoided some of the drawbacks of an earlier teleological tradition. Second, we situate the pamphlet within a longer trajectory of inquiry into part-whole relations in biology from the mid-eighteenth century to the present. We argue that biological individuality, along with the problem-complexes with which it engaged, was as central a problem to naturalists before 1859 as evolution, and that Leuckart’s contributions to it left a long legacy that persisted well into the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • In Seven Vdcs of Rukum District, Nepal
    PREVALENCE OF GASTRO-INTESTINAL PARASITES OF HORSES (Equus caballus Linnaeus, 1758) IN SEVEN VDCS OF RUKUM DISTRICT, NEPAL NARESH OLI T.U. Registration No: 5-2-54-233-2009 T.U. Examination Roll No: Zoo. 28 Batch: 2070/71 A thesis submitted In partial fulfillments of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science in Zoology with special paper Parasitology Submitted To Central Department of Zoology Institute of Science and Technology Tribhuvan University Kirtipur, Kathmandu Nepal December, 2016 DECLARATION I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis entitled “Prevalence of Gastro- intestinal Parasites of Horses (Equus caballus Linnaeus, 1758) in Seven VDCs of Rukum District, Nepal” has been done by myself, and has not been submitted elsewhere for the award of any degree. All the sources of the information have been specifically acknowledged by reference to the author(s) or institution(s). Date: Naresh Oli [email protected] i RECOMMENDATION This is to recommend that the thesis entitled “Prevalence of Gastro-intestinal Parasites of Horses (Equus caballus Linnaeus, 1758) in Seven VDCs of Rukum District, Nepal” has been carried out by Mr. Naresh Oli for the partial fulfillment of Master’s Degree of Science in Zoology with special paper ‘Parasitology’. This is his original work and has been carried out under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, this thesis work has not been submitted for any other degree in any institutions. Date: Supervisor Mr. Janak Raj Subedi Lecturer Central Department of Zoology Tribhuvan University Kathmandu, Nepal ii LETTER OF APPROVAL On the recommendation of supervisor Lecturer Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reinterpretation of TH Huxley's Evolutionary View
    The Dinosaur Connection: A Reinterpretation of T.H. Huxley's Evolutionary View MARIO A. DI GREGORIO Darwin College Cambridge, England The traditional understanding of T. H. Huxley's role in the history of evolutionary ideas has been based on certain prominent biographical, even autobiographical, material: that Huxley was a colleague of Darwin, that he was apparently forthright in his defense and exposition of Darwin's ideas almost immediately after publication of the Origin of Species, that he was - in short - "Darwin's bulldog," ~ reacting to the Or/g/n as an overdue "flash of light. ''2 Michael Bartholomew's 1975 analysis of Huxley 3 argues that there was no real turning point in Huxley's scientific approach after the publication of the Origin of Species, and that even after 1859 Huxley held a basically pre-Darwinian attitude to science. Whether or not one agrees with Bartholomew's view, his article contributed to a change of perspective among scholars working on Huxley's scientific thought. A cursory examination of Huxley's scientific work reveals that he began to deploy the idea of evolution only in 1868, nine years after publication of the Origin, scarcely the response one would expect upon receipt of a blinding inspiration; Huxley's own research, in other words, seems to contradict any claim that the Origin of Species persuaded him of the value of the concept of evolution. Closer scrutiny of Huxley's work, even subsequent to 1868, reveals further that one of the obviously distinctive features of Darwin's theory - the notion of natural selection - fails to appear at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Rudolf Leuckart – Wikipedia
    Rudolf Leuckart – Wikipedia https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Leuckart aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie Karl Georg Friedrich Rudolf Leuckart (* 7. Oktober 1822 in Helmstedt; † 6. Februar 1898 in Leipzig) war ein deutscher Zoologe und Begründer der Parasitologie. 1 Leben 2 Werke 3 Ehrungen 4 Literatur 5 Einzelnachweise 6 Weblinks Rudolf Leuckart Rudolf Leuckart war Sohn des Buchdruckereibesitzers und Ratsherrn Gottfried Leuckart[1] und Neffe des Mediziners und Naturkundeprofessors Friedrich Andreas Sigismund Leuckart (1794–1843). Er studierte seit 1842 in Göttingen Medizin und Naturwissenschaften und wurde noch während seiner Studienzeit von Rudolf Wagner mit der Fortsetzung von dessen Vorträgen über allgemeine Naturgeschichte und mit der Vollendung seines Lehrbuchs der Zootomie betraut. Am 13. Dezember 1845 promovierte er mit Zoologisches Institut (1880), Leipzig Auszeichnung, und als Assistent von Rudolf Wagner am physiologischen Institut habilitierte er 1847 als Privatdozent für Zoologie und Physiologie. Für die Habilitationsschrift hatte Leuckart Studien vor allem an der Nordsee durchgeführt. Darin legte er eine neue Systematik der Wirbellosen vor, die ihn schnell bekannt machte.[2] 1850 ging er als außerordentlicher Professor der Zoologie nach Gießen. Im selben Jahr heiratete er in Schönberg (Odenwald) die aus Halle stammende Amélie Henke (1827–1921); das Paar bekam mindestens vier Kinder (Hermine, Rudolf, Eugenie, Elisabeth). Leuckarts wissenschaftliche Arbeiten beziehen sich besonders auf die Erforschung des Lebens, des Baues und Werdens, auf die anatomisch-physiologische Analyse der Tiere, vor allem der niederen Tiere. Zusammen mit Carl Bergmann veröffentlichte er 1852 die Anatomisch-physiologische Uebersicht des Thierreichs. Vergleichende Anatomie und Physiologie, in der die Wirbellosen erstmals neben den Wirbeltieren ausführlich behandelt wurden. 1855 erhielt er mit nur 33 Jahren eine ordentliche Professur in Gießen.
    [Show full text]
  • 27Th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Parasitology 9–12 March 2016 | Göttingen, Germany
    27th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Parasitology 9–12 March 2016 | Göttingen, Germany Scientific Program • Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:30–17:00 Welcome Address Room Lecture Hall 009 17:00–18:45 Award Ceremony and Appointing of Honorary Members Room Lecture Hall 009 Chair Egbert Tannich (Hamburg/Germany) 17:00–17:30 Presentation of Rudolf Leuckart-Medal Heidrun Moll (Würzburg) 17:30–18:20 Presentation of Karl-Asmund-Rudolphi-Medal Principles & anomalies: the power of comparative parasitology Awardee Marcel Deponte (Heidelberg/Germany) Deciphering the function of the trypanosome epigenome in gene regulation and immune evasion Awardee Nicolai Siegel (Würzburg/Germany) 18:20–18:45 Appointing of Honorary Members Rolf Garms (Hamburg/Germany) Laudatio by Egbert Tannich (Hamburg/Germany) Peter Wenk (Tübingen/Germany) Laudatio by Susanne Hartmann (Berlin/Germany) from 18:45 Welcome Reception Location Foyer 27th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Parasitology 9–12 March 2016 | Göttingen, Germany Scientific Program • Thursday, 10 March 2016 08:30–10:00 Workshop I: Protozoan parasites I (Genetics and epigenetics) Room Lecture Hall 009 Chairs Gabriele Pradel (Aachen/Germany) Markus Engstler (Würzburg/Germany) 08:30–08:45 De novo assembly of the Trypanosoma brucei Lister 427 strain WS1-P1 genome combining PacBio sequencing and genome-wide chromosomal contact data Raúl Oscar Cosentino (Würzburg/Germany) 08:45–09:00 Genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) reveals the WS1-P2 3D architecture of the Trypanosoma brucei genome Laura
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites and the Germ Theory of Disease 51 Completing an M .D
    Parasites and the Germ Theory o f Disease JOHN FARLEY Dalhousie University, Halifax i |HERE HAS ARISEN, ’ NOTED DR. AUGUST HIRSCH (1885, vol. 2, 279) in his Handbook o f Geographical and 1 Historical; Pathology, “a prospect of adding to this de­ partment of pathology.” The department to which he referred was that of “parasitic diseases,” and what was to be added to it, he thought, were “ infectious diseases.” Such diseases, he estimated, may well be of “ a parasitic nature, or that there occur in them organisms of the lowest rank of organic development— the micrococci and bacilli.” Hirsch, like many others at that time, stood on the brink of accepting a generalized parasitic theory of disease. In this article I will examine the history of parasitology in the nineteenth and early twentieth century, and suggest ways in which models drawn from the study of parasitic organisms may have influ­ enced debates over the etiology of infectious diseases. I shall argue that a generalized parasitic theory o f disease only appeared very briefly, if at all, at the end o f the nineteenth century. Both before and after this short period, those who studied parasites seemed to have little to offer those concerned with infectious diseases; parasites made min­ imal contributions to the modern germ theory o f disease. The professional study o f parasitic organisms long predated the era of Pasteur and Koch; it began essentially in Germany at the beginning of the nineteenth century. In 1810, for example, Carl Rudolphi, who began his career at the University o f Greifswald in Sweden after The Milbank Quarterly, Vol.
    [Show full text]