DOCSLIB.ORG

TRANSPORTATION a Design-Build Done Right™ Deeper Dive Addressing Unique Technical Issues in Transportation Design-Build

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRANSPORTATION a Design-Build Done Right™ Deeper Dive Addressing Unique Technical Issues in Transportation Design-Build Webinar Series Coming Spring/Summer 2018 KEY FACTORS TO ADDRESS WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY IN TRANSPORTATION A Design-Build Done Right™ Deeper Dive Addressing Unique Technical Issues in Transportation Design-Build Table of Contents Introduction . .3 Use of Alternative Technical Concepts (ATCs) in Transportation Design-Build . .4 Right-of-Way Acquisition in Transportation Design-Build . 11 Utilities Management in Transportation Design-Build . .19 Maintenance of Tra c (MOT) in Transportation Design-Build. 26 Environmental Analysis and Permitting in Transportation Design-Build . 30 2 Addressing Unique Technical Issues in Transportation Design-Build Introduction This publication is a Design-Build Done Right™ Deeper Dive. Vetted through contributions from Owners, designers, contrac- Deeper Dives build on concepts outlined in various other DBIA tors, lawyers and academia, this document is a comprehensive primers. Speci cally, this document builds on the following: guide for owners and design-build teams on some of the most pressing issues in transportation design-build delivery. As with • Design-Build Done Right™ Universally Applicable Best Practices all DBIA documents, broad industry input from diverse perspec- tives helps ensure that our guidance is written to ensure success • Transportation Sector Design-Build Best Practices for all – both owners and practitioners. These documents, and numerous other design-build resources, As the design-build industry continues to evolve, this Deeper Dive are available for download at www.dbia.org. will also evolve, expanding to add new topics or altered content to t industry needs and the current state of practice. DBIA recognizes that there are real-world di erences among design-build market sectors (e.g., transportation, water/waste- DBIA intends to continually update our portfolio of publications, water, federal projects and building facilities), and that issues tools and other resources so that design-build stakeholders will speci c to one sector may not apply in another. As such, DBIA have access to leading-edge information that will allow them to expects that users of design-build in the transportation sector accomplish Design-Build Done Right™. will bene t from having more detailed guidance on certain con- siderations and areas of risk that should be carefully addressed early in the design-build process. The following key areas are the focus of this publication: • Use of Alternative Technical Concepts (ATCs) • Right-of-way Acquisition • Utilities Management • Maintenance of Tra c (MOT) • Environmental Analysis and Permitting 3 Addressing Unique Technical Issues in Transportation Design-Build Use of Alternative Technical Concepts (ATCs) in Transportation Design-Build A DESIGN-BUILD INSTITUTE OF AMERICA PUBLICATION Introduction An ATC found to be acceptable to the Owner can then be incor- porated into the proposal and considered in the nal selection Design-build project delivery introduces schedule, cost and tech- process. It is important to note that an Owner may place a nical e ciencies to the development of transportation projects. conditional approval on an ATC, which after award may require One way in which projects can signi cantly bene t from the new further vetting by the Owner and design-build team. However, dynamics of integrated design and construction is by allowing an ATC – even with conditions to the approval – will most often the submission and incorporation of approved Alternative be viewed as less risky by the proposer, allowing them to o er a Technical Concepts (ATCs) into proposers’ submissions during the better price to the Owner. The ATC process allows for an e cient procurement process. way to vet innovative solutions during the pre-award phase, when the Owner will realize the maximum bene t. In contrast, Owners are required to deliver large, complex infrastructure proj- vetting solutions post award, when such solutions would gener- ects at the best value to their constituents. As the construction in- ally otherwise have to be brought forward as value engineering dustry continues to recognize the many advantages of best value proposals by the winning team, means the Owner will generally awards, compared with contracts historically being awarded to realize only a portion of the savings. Allowing the evaluation of the lowest responsive bidder, it is critical to have mechanisms in innovative ideas only post award could introduce delays and po- the procurement process that allow proposers to di erentiate tential con icts in the design; or worse, the ideas will not surface their best value solution to the project. Allowing proposers to at all due to the complications of trying to incorporate them into demonstrate their approach to add value to the project through an already winning proposal, which can result in the Owner and the use of ATCs is one very important tool for Owners to be able end-users likely receiving less than the best value. to document that di erentiation. This allows the Owner to evalu- ate potential innovation, as well as the level of commitment the Design-build has been demonstrated to be the project delivery proposer is bringing to the project, at an early stage in project method of choice for successful transportation projects for over development, often requiring minimal additional investment by 20 years. While design-build allows for the Owner to contract the Owner. with a single entity to design and construct the project, the pro- curement process does not always allow for variances from the The Alternate Technical Concept (ATC) process, coupled with pro- original program or design criteria (deviations from speci cation) prietary one-on-one meetings, provides a venue for proposers provided by the Owner in the RFP documents. and Owners to discuss innovative solutions/ideas in a con den- tial setting. The ATC concepts may be associated with design ATCs allow industry to provide innovative solutions to the criteria changes, alternate design solutions for nearly any project stakeholders’ concerns, while still working within the original component, construction methods, operations and/or mainte- programming requirements and design intent (RFP Documents). nance functions or material selection – to name just a few areas The use of ATCs allows the competing proposers to invest in where ATCs may bring value to a proposed project solution. identifying alternate solutions of equal or better value prior to submission of the proposal that bene t the Owner and their stakeholders. 4 Addressing Unique Technical Issues in Transportation Design-Build An Owner can recognize the added value the ATC brings to the Background project, including the full value of any savings realized by an approved ATC, at the time of proposal submission. This allows the In 2014, DBIA published Universal Design-Build Best Practices Owner to more fully bene t from the best value selection process and associated Implementing Techniques. As implied, these implemented. It is important to note that some ATCs may not Best Practices and Implementing Techniques are universal bring a direct cost savings, but still add signi cant value to the across all market sectors: Private, Federal, Water/Wastewater project in the form of reduced risk, lowered future maintenance and Transportation. In an e ort to provide continued guidance cost (life cycle cost improvement), enhanced delivery schedule on Best Practices, in 2015, the DBIA Transportation Committee or other forms of indirect savings to the project Owner/end users. identi ed several design-build delivery disciplines within the The Owner may realize one or more of the following additional transportation sector that are commonly considered higher risk bene ts from the incorporation of accepted ATCs into a winning or disciplines with unique consideration in design-build delivery. proposal: The disciplines are: • Improved schedule. • Alternative Technical Concepts • Cost savings. • Right-of-Way • Reduced environmental or community impacts. • Utilities • Reduced right-of-way and utilities impacts. • Maintenance of Tra c • Reduced or eliminated project risk. • Environmental Permitting and compliance • Improved project quality and performance. In the fall of 2015, DBIA published transportation-speci c Implementing Techniques that support the Universal Best • Better coordination/integration with stakeholders, traveling Practices and Implementing Techniques to be considered by public, safety and/or third party utilities. Owners and design-build teams in procurement (including planning), contract language and post-award phases of a project • Reduced operating and maintenance costs (improved life for the above disciplines. These additional transportation-spe- cycle costs). ci c Implementing Techniques, when used in conjunction with the universal DBIA Best Practices publication, provide industry At the same time, the proposer should anticipate the likelihood with a road map for the best opportunity to be successful on of receiving an improved technical rating of their proposal under design-build projects. various criteria in a best value evaluation that comes with a more competitive price, a true win/win situation. This is particularly To build on the success of the prior publications and to respond to true when compared to a Value Engineering Change Process comments received at the 2015 DBIA Transportation Conference, (VECP) that occurs post award, where savings from innovative DBIA has established additional guidance and further
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning Curriculum in Art and Design
    Planning Curriculum in Art and Design Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Planning Curriculum in Art and Design Melvin F. Pontious (retired) Fine Arts Consultant Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Tony Evers, PhD, State Superintendent Madison, Wisconsin This publication is available from: Content and Learning Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 125 South Webster Street Madison, WI 53703 608/261-7494 cal.dpi.wi.gov/files/cal/pdf/art.design.guide.pdf © December 2013 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction does not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, creed, age, national origin, ancestry, pregnancy, marital status or parental status, sexual orientation, or disability. Foreword Art and design education are part of a comprehensive Pre-K-12 education for all students. The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction continues its efforts to support the skill and knowledge development for our students across the state in all content areas. This guide is meant to support this work as well as foster additional reflection on the instructional framework that will most effectively support students’ learning in art and design through creative practices. This document represents a new direction for art education, identifying a more in-depth review of art and design education. The most substantial change involves the definition of art and design education as the study of visual thinking – including design, visual communications, visual culture, and fine/studio art. The guide provides local, statewide, and national examples in each of these areas to the reader. The overall framework offered suggests practice beyond traditional modes and instead promotes a more constructivist approach to learning.
    [Show full text]
  • Ergonomics, Design Universal and Fashion
    Work 41 (2012) 4733-4738 4733 DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0761-4733 IOS Press Ergonomics, design universal and fashion Martins, S. B. Dr.ª and Martins, L. B.Dr.b a State University of Londrina, Department of Design, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid Km. 380 Campus Universitário,86051-970, Londrina, PR, Brazil. [email protected] b Federal University of Pernambuco, Department of Design, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitária, 50670-901, Recife- PE, Brazil. [email protected] Abstract. People who lie beyond the "standard" model of users often come up against barriers when using fashion products, especially clothing, the design of which ought to give special attention to comfort, security and well-being. The principles of universal design seek to extend the design process for products manufactured in bulk so as to include people who, because of their personal characteristics or physical conditions, are at an extreme end of some dimension of performance, whether this is to do with sight, hearing, reach or manipulation. Ergonomics, a discipline anchored on scientific data, regards human beings as the central focus of its operations and, consequently, offers various forms of support to applying universal design in product development. In this context, this paper sets out a reflection on applying the seven principles of universal design to fashion products and clothing with a view to targeting such principles as recommendations that will guide the early stages of developing these products, and establish strategies for market expansion, thereby increasing the volume of production and reducing prices. Keywords: Ergonomics in fashion, universal design, people with disabilities 1.
    [Show full text]
  • [ENTER NAME of PROJECT] PROJECT CHARTER SMALL to MEDIUM PROJECTS [Enter Date] V1.0
    [ENTER NAME OF PROJECT] PROJECT CHARTER SMALL TO MEDIUM PROJECTS [Enter Date] V1.0 Campus Planning and Facilities Management – Design and Construction 1276 University of Oregon, Eugene OR 97403-1276 541-346-8292 | fax 541-346-6927 cpfm.uoregon.edu/design-construction An equal-opportunity, affirmative-action institution committed to cultural diversity and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………….. 3 Purpose of the Project Charter ………………………………………… 3 2. BASIC PROJECT DELIVERY PROCESS ….……………………………… 4 3. PROJECT OVERVIEW/GOALS ……………………..……………………. 4 4. SCOPE ……………………………………………………………………. 5 4.1 Objectives ………………………………………………………… 5 4.2 Boundaries ……………………………………………………….. 5 5. ASSUMPTIONS AND RISKS ……………………………………………… 5 5.1 Assumptions ……………………………………………………... 5 5.2 Risks ……………………………………………………………... 5 5.3 Exclusions ………………………………………………………… 5 6. DURATION ……………………………………………………………….. 5 5.1Timeline …………………………………………………………... 5 7. BUDGET OPINION …………………………………………………... 6 6.1 Funding Source ………………………………………………..... 6 6.2 Estimate ………………………………………………………..... 6 8. CONTRACT METHODOLOY ………………………………………... …… 7 9. PROJECT ORGANIZATION ……………………………………………… 8 10. FUNDING SOURCES ……………………………………………………. 11 11. PROJECT CHARTER APPROVALS…………………………………….. 12 APPENDIX A: KEY ACRONYMS AND TERMS …………………………….. 13 APPENDIX B: REFERENCE MATERIALS …………………………………. 15 APPENDIX C: PROJECT CHARTER CHANGE TRACKING ........................ 16 Page 3 of 20 PROJECT NAME PROJECT NUMBER 1. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Design in Architectural Education: Who Is Doing It? How Is It Being Done?
    Universal design in architectural education: Who is doing it? How is it being done? 1 1 1 Megan Basnak , Beth Tauke , Sue Weidemann 1IDeA Center, University at Buffalo—State University of New York, Buffalo, NY ABSTRACT: The World Health Organization estimates that over one billion people, or 15% of the world’s population, have some form of disability. As demographics change and the world’s population continues to age, this number is expected to dramatically increase. In response to this global trend, many designers, advocates, and anyone interested in making physical and visual environments more usable for people with diverse backgrounds and abilities have adopted the philosophy known as universal design (UD), inclusive design, or design for all. Despite the demonstrated need for designers who are knowledgeable in UD theory and practice, it seems that architecture programs in U.S. universities have been slow to adequately incorporate UD into their curricula. In an effort to gain a better understanding of the current state of UD content in architecture curricula, researchers distributed an online survey to architectural educators and administrators in 120 U.S. institutions with accredited degree programs. The study, sponsored by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR), consisted of qualitative and quantitative questions that sought information related to the understanding, attitudes, and incorporation of UD into each participant’s curriculum. Responses were obtained from 463 participants representing 104 of the 120 surveyed schools. Quantitative analyses found relationships between perceived attitudes of administrators, faculty, and students and the effectiveness of UD components in a program. Qualitative findings were rich and complex, revealing great variability across schools, in terms of how, when (course level), and the degree to which UD aspects were incorporated into programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Environment Development Based on Universal Design Principles
    E3S Web of Conferences 31, 09010 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109010 ICENIS 2017 Urban Environment Development based on Universal Design Principles Bangun IR Harsritanto1,* 1Architecture Department of Engineering Faculty, Diponegoro University, Semarang - Indonesia Abstract. Universal Design is a design which facilitated full range of human diversity. By applying Universal design principles, urban environment can be more functional and more user-friendly for everyone. This study examined five urban streets of South Korea as a country experienced on developing various urban street designs based on universal design. This study aimed to examine and compare the South Korea cases using seven principles of universal design. The research methods of this study are literature study, case study, and site observation. The results of this study are: South Korea cases are good practices, urgency of implementing the direction into local regulations; and change of urban development paradigm. 1 Introduction 2. Site observation was used to inspect South Korea urban streets with evaluation sheet which Urban streetscape which designed and developed in constructed before, and measured by interval scales detail with a special theme or purpose of urban of five points. development. However, not all people can access the 3. Case study was used to explain several phenomena specialized street easily because of their different ability happening on the site observation and later on can (as the elderly, children and people with special needs). be generalized into the bigger scope of research Universal design (also called inclusive design or area. accessible design) refers to facility designs that accommodate the widest range of potential users, including people with mobility and visual disabilities 3 Discussions and other special needs [11].
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering an Undergraduate Innovation Eco-System
    First in Europe - First in Ireland - First in Innovation Engineering an Undergraduate Innovation Eco-System Pictorial Compendium of International & National Innovation Awards Vincent Forde pictured with Sons Sacha, Blaise and Jude Enterprise Ireland Student Entrepreneur Awards Overall Winner and Student Entrepreneur of the Year 2016 Vincent Forde, Gasgon Medical, Cork Institute of Technology CIT Multidisciplinary Teams Win All Five Major Awards at National Finals (1) Enterprise Ireland Overall Winner and Student Entrepreneur of the Year 2016 (2) Cruickshank Intellectual Property Attorneys National Award 2016 (3) Grant Thornton National Award 2016 (4)Intel ICT National Award 2016 (5)Enterprise Ireland Academic Innovation National Award 2016 National Prize-Winners in Engineering Innovation, Design & Entrepreneurship Innovative Product Development Laboratories Recent National student successes include: Three Enterprise Ireland / Invest Northern Ireland Young Entrepreneur of the Year First Place National Awards ( 2016, 2013, 2007 ) Three Enterprise Ireland / Invest Northern Ireland Academic Innovation National Awards ( 2016, 2012, 2009 ) One Accenture Leaders of Tomorrow First Place National Award Accenture HQ Grand Canal Square Dublin ( 2016 ) Five Enterprise Ireland Cruickshank Most Technologically Innovative Project First Place National Awards(2016, 2013, 2009, 2008, 2007) Nine MEETA Asset Management and Maintenance National Awards ( 2016(x2), 2015(x2), 2014, 2013(x2), 2011, 2006 ) One James Dyson Design National Award Ireland ( 2016 )
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Elaine Ostroff Universal Design Papers
    Guide to the Elaine Ostroff Universal Design Papers NMAH.AC.1356 Alison Oswald 2016 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 4 Biographical Note............................................................................................................. 2 Historical Note.................................................................................................................. 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Personal/Biographical Materials, 1967 - 2008.......................................... 5 Series 2: Subject Files, 1965 - 2008....................................................................... 7 Series 3: Universal Design Education Program Files,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Is Universal Design a Critical Theory?
    Chapter 1 Is Universal Design a Critical Theory? N. D’souza 1.1. Introduction Universal design is a term that was first used in the United States by Ron Mace (1985) although forms of it were quite prevalent in Europe long before. For the purpose of this chapter Universal Design is defined as ‘the design of all products and environments to be usable by people of all ages and abilities to the greatest extent possible (Story, 2001, p.10.3). Universal design in recent years has assumed growing importance as a new paradigm that aims at a holistic approach ranging in scale from product design (Balaram, 2001) to architecture (Mace, 1985), and urban design (Steinfield, 2001) on one hand and systems of media (Goldberg, 2001) and information technology (Brewer, 2001) on the other. Given the popularity, Universal design still remains largely atheoretical i..e. the researchers of Universal design do not explicitly affiliate themselves to any form of theoretical paradigm. One of the reason is perhaps because Universal design is a melting point between cross paradigms. By paradigms I mean basic orientations to theory and research (Newman, 1997, p.62). In this sense Universal design can come under functionalist paradigm (because it caters to utility), pragmatic (because it is instrumental in nature), positivistic (because it strives for universal principles), normative (because it prescribes certain rules) and critical theorist paradigms (because it gives voice to the oppressed). Conventionally the word universal is synonymous to general and refers to a set of principles that are stable, timeless and value free. In this sense universal design could be interpreted as deriving from a positivist paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to Diversity Including Disability
    Design Research Society DRS Digital Library DRS Biennial Conference Series DRS2018 - Catalyst Jun 25th, 12:00 AM Responding to Diversity Including Disability René Sørensen Overby Aalborg University Camilla Ryhl Aalborg University Follow this and additional works at: https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers Citation Sørensen Overby, R., and Ryhl, C. (2018) Responding to Diversity Including Disability, in Storni, C., Leahy, K., McMahon, M., Lloyd, P. and Bohemia, E. (eds.), Design as a catalyst for change - DRS International Conference 2018, 25-28 June, Limerick, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.524 This Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Conference Proceedings at DRS Digital Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in DRS Biennial Conference Series by an authorized administrator of DRS Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Responding to Diversity Including Disability SØRENSEN OVERBY René* and RYHL Camilla Aalborg University e-mail: [email protected] doi: 10.21606/drs.2018. 524 This paper constructs a framework for understanding how notions of disability influence the discourse on accessibility and Universal Design as well as the present understanding of the user role in Denmark. Implications are that the understanding of disability and design of architecture are not mutually opposed to one another. Instead they are closely interwoven in the fabric of designing for diversity. Through the perspectives of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Disabled People's Organisations Denmark and the practicing Architects, the paper discusses three notions of disability. Initial findings of the PhD research project “Generating Inclusive Built Environments through User Driven Dialogue in the Architectural Design Process” along with qualitative research conducted at the Danish Building Research Institute frame former and current thinking, and discusses the scope of reviewing impairment as a condition of human variety in the architectural design process.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to International Association for Universal Design
    Introduction to International Association for Universal Design V Kunio Tsutatani (Manuscript received October 13, 2004) In Japan, many products incorporating Universal Design (UD) have recently been marketed and successes with such products have been increasing. In December 2002, the International Conference for Universal Design in Japan 2002 was held in Japan, this being the first conference on UD to be held in our country. Based on ideas pro- posed at this conference and the conclusions drawn, the International Association for Universal Design (IAUD) was inaugurated in November 2003. Membership of the IAUD is not limited to manufacturing industries. Its many members span all representative Japanese industries, from the distribution industry to the service industry. The IAUD will not just concern itself with educational programs related to UD and the promotion of UD, it is hoped that it will be an influential proactive organization that addresses complex UD problems that could not be solved by individual companies or industries, through cooperation between industry, government, and academia. This paper describes the history of the establishment of the IAUD, outlines its activities and reports on Designing for the 21st Century III, a recently held international conference on UD. Also, this paper looks at Fujitsu’s involvement in the IAUD, the impact of the IAUD on business and its role in the creation of new business opportunities and gives an outlook for future activities. 1. Introduction projects that cross industry and business bound- There had been tremendous activity in in- aries with the aim of creating attractive products dustry with many attempts being made to apply and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Practices of Accessible Urban Development
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres, and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environmental data and information on which Member States of the United Nations draw to review common problems and to take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in the present publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitations of its frontiers. The term “country” as used in the text of this review also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. The designations of country groups in the text and the tables are intended solely for statistical or analytical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgement about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of the names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics in Design: Pluralism and the Case for Justice in Inclusive Design
    Design Research Society DRS Digital Library DRS Biennial Conference Series DRS2018 - Catalyst Jun 25th, 12:00 AM Ethics in Design: pluralism and the case for justice in inclusive design Matteo Bianchin Università di Milano-Bicocca Ann Heylighen KU Leuven Follow this and additional works at: https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers Citation Bianchin, M., and Heylighen, A. (2018) Ethics in Design: pluralism and the case for justice in inclusive design, in Storni, C., Leahy, K., McMahon, M., Lloyd, P. and Bohemia, E. (eds.), Design as a catalyst for change - DRS International Conference 2018, 25-28 June, Limerick, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.21606/ drs.2018.221 This Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Conference Proceedings at DRS Digital Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in DRS Biennial Conference Series by an authorized administrator of DRS Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ethics in Design: pluralism and the case for justice in inclusive design BIANCHIN Matteoa and HEYLIGHEN Annb* a Università di Milano-Bicocca b KU Leuven * Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] doi: 10.21606/drs.2018.221 The growing recognition of ethics’ relevance to design fuelled the development of ethics- and value-centred design approaches. Despite their potential to address ethics in design proactively, they are criticized for failing to clarify their goals and explicate their theoretical basis. Since any ethical theory recruited in design must take seriously the fact of pluralism, only principle-based normative theories – as contrasted with value-based theories – seem fit.
    [Show full text]