DOCSLIB.ORG

Altai-Sayan Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Altai-Sayan Project United Nations Development Programme/Global Environment Facility Government of the Russian Federation Biodiversity Conservation in the Russian Portion of the Altai‐Sayan Ecoregion (“Altai‐Sayan Project”) PIMS 1685 Project Final Evaluation Report Max Kasparek December 2011 Acknowledgements I would like to thank all the staff and people connected with the Altai‐Sayan Project who provided me with all the necessary information and gave freely of their time and ideas to make the Terminal Evaluation process a success. This evaluation was carried out in a highly collegial spirit throughout. I would like to thank in particular the UNDP Project Support Office, the Project Manager and other Project Staff for the professional organisation of the evaluation mission and their patience for often lengthy discussions. The full support of all team members made it possible to conduct the tight travel schedule with a full meeting programme. My thanks are also due to all project executing partners and local stakeholders for fruitful discussions and for making available to me all information needed. Max Kasparek Project Executing Partners Executing Agency: Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) of the Russian Federation Principal Participating Regional Governments and Administrations in the Russian Part of the Altai‐ Partners: Sayan Ecoregion GEF Implementing Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Evaluation Responsibility This Final Evaluation is undertaken by the UNDP Project Support Office in the Russian Federation and the UNDP Bratislava Regional Centre as the GEF Implementing Agency for this project. UNDP Russian Federation Leontievsky per., 9, Moscow Russian Federation UNDP, Europe and the CIS Grosslingova 35, 81109 Bratislava Bratislava Regional Centre Slovak Republic Evaluator International Evaluation Expert: Dr. Max Kasparek Mönchhofstr. 16, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany Email: Kasparek@t‐online.de 2 Inhalt Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 10 Purpose of the Evaluation .................................................................................................... 10 Key Issues Addressed ........................................................................................................... 11 Methodology of the Evaluation ........................................................................................... 11 2. The Project and its Development Context ........................................................................... 13 2.1 Project Data .................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Problems to be Addressed by the Project ...................................................................... 14 2.3 Project Objective and Expected Outcomes .................................................................... 15 2.4 Main Stakeholders .......................................................................................................... 16 3. Findings and Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Project Formulation........................................................................................................ 16 3.2 Project Implementation and Management ................................................................... 19 3.3 Project Finances ............................................................................................................. 28 3.3 Project Achievements (Results) ..................................................................................... 31 3.3.1 Attainment of the Project Objective and Outcomes .............................................. 31 3.3.2 Attainments of Outputs .......................................................................................... 36 3.4 Assessment of Project Achievements according to OECD‐DAC Standards .................... 46 3.4.1 Relevance ................................................................................................................ 46 3.4.2 Effectiveness............................................................................................................ 46 3.4.3 Efficiency ................................................................................................................. 47 3.4.4 Impact ...................................................................................................................... 48 3.4.5 Sustainability ........................................................................................................... 48 3.4.6 Coherence and Coordination .................................................................................. 48 3.4.7 Project Management ............................................................................................... 48 4. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................... 49 General conclusions ......................................................................................................... 50 Lessons Learned and Recommendations ......................................................................... 51 Endnotes ................................................................................................................................... 53 Annexes 3 List of Abbreviations APR Annual Project Review ASE Altai‐Sayan Ecoregion BMU Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (Germany) CBO Community‐based Organisation CO Country Office DAC Development Assistance Committee of OECD GEF Global Environment Facility GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH (former: GTZ) GTZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH (now: GIZ) ICI International Climate Change Imitative M&E Monitoring & Evaluation METT Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool MNR Ministry of Natural Resources MTE Mid‐term Evaluation NGO Non‐governmental Organisation NSC National Steering Committee OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development PA Protected Area PIR Project Implementation Report PIU Project Implementing Unit PSC Project Steering Committee SGP (GEF SGP) Small Grants Programme of GEF TE Terminal Evaluation TEK Traditional Environmental Knowledge TOR Terms of Reference UNDP United Nations Development Programme WWF World Wide Fund for Nature 4 Executive Summary Description of project The goal of the Altai‐Sayan Project has been defined as „Conservation and sustainable use of globally significant biological diversity in Russia’s Altai‐Sayan Ecoregion“, and the objective as “Ecosystem‐ based approach to biodiversity conservation is operationalized in the Russian territory of the Altai‐ Sayan Mountain ecoregion“. This objective was intended to be achieved through two outcomes and seven outputs: Outcome 1: Strengthened and expanded Protected Areas System. Output 1: Conservation of rare and endangered species. Output 2: Strengthening and expanded protected areas system. Output 3: Strengthened legal and institutional framework for biodiversity conservation and transboundary management. Output 4: Increased levels of biodiversity awareness among major stakeholder groups and the rural population. Outcome 2: Strengthened enabling environment for ecosystem‐based biodiversity conservation. Output 5: Improved information on biodiversity, including TEK, and its use in decision‐ making. Output 6: Mainstreaming biodiversity conservation into regional decision making pro‐ cess. Output 7: Development of alternative livelihoods and involvement of local communities in natural resource management. In December 2009, additional funding was secured from the German Government through the Inter‐ national Climate Change Initiative (ICI), and a third outcome was added to the log frame: Outcome 3: Expansion of the protected area network, protection of the carbon pools within the expanded PAs system and setting up climate resilient PAs networks in the ASE region. Output 8: Expansion of the Protected Areas Network for the conservation of the Altai‐ Sayan Region Output 9: Fire Management interventions in place in existing and new protected areas Output 10: Assist in adapting natural ecosystems to climate changes in specific protected areas. Output 11: Enable alternative livelihood incentives and encourage sustainable use of natural resources among local communities. Activities for this third outcome have not been completed yet and may continue for at least another year. This outcome is not subject of this evaluation accordingly. Preliminary observations on project performance regarding this outcome are given in the Annex. The project is executed by the Ministry for Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federa‐ tion with the direct joint participation of the Regional Governments and Administrations of the Altai‐ Sayan Ecoregion. The Russian part of the ecoregion is divided administratively into six regions, or subjects of federation. They are Krasnoyarsky and Altaisky krai, Republics of Tuva, Altai and Khakasi‐ ya, and Kemerovskaya oblast. No project sites have been identified in the Republic of Buryatia and Irkutsk Oblast, which partially overlap with the eastern part of the Altai‐Sayan Ecoregion. The GEF grant comprised approximately US$3.9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spatial Integration of Siberian Regional Markets
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Spatial Integration of Siberian Regional Markets Gluschenko, Konstantin Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk State University 2 April 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85667/ MPRA Paper No. 85667, posted 02 Apr 2018 23:10 UTC Spatial Integration of Siberian Regional Markets Konstantin Gluschenko Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IEIE SB RAS), and Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk, Russia E-mail address: [email protected] This paper studies market integration of 13 regions constituting Siberia with one another and all other Russian regions. The law of one price serves as a criterion of market integration. The data analyzed are time series of the regional costs of a basket of basic foods (staples basket) over 2001–2015. Pairs of regional markets are divided into four groups: perfectly integrated, conditionally integrated, not integrated but tending towards integration (converging), and neither integrated nor converging. Nonlinear time series models with asymptotically decaying trends describe price convergence. Integration of Siberian regional markets is found to be fairly strong; they are integrated and converging with about 70% of country’s regions (including Siberian regions themselves). Keywords: market integration, law of one price; price convergence; nonlinear trend; Russian regions. JEL classification: C32, L81, P22, R15 Prepared for the Conference “Economy of Siberia under Global Challenges of the XXI Century” dedicated to the 60th anniversary of the IEIE SB RAS; Novosibirsk, Russia, June 18–20, 2018. 1. Introduction The national product market is considered as a system with elements being its spatial segments, regional markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • In Flora of Altai
    Ukrainian Journal of Ecology Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2018, 8(4), 362-369 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Genus Campanula L. (Campanulaceae Juss.) in flora of Altai A.I. Shmakov1, A.A. Kechaykin1, T.A. Sinitsyna1, D.N. Shaulo2, S.V. Smirnov1 1South-Siberian Botanical Garden, Altai State University, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia, E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2Central Siberian Botanical Garden, Zolotodolinskaya st., 101, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia. Received: 29.10.2018. Accepted: 03.12.2018 A taxonomic study of the genus Campanula L. in the flora of Altai is presented. Based on the data obtained, 14 Campanula species, belonging to 3 subgenera and 7 sections, grow in the territory of the Altai Mountain Country. The subgenus Campanula includes 4 sections and 8 species and is the most diverse in the flora of Altai. An original key is presented to determine the Campanula species in Altai. For each species, nomenclature, ecological and geographical data, as well as information about type material, are provided. New locations of Campanula species are indicated for separate botanical and geographical regions of Altai. Keywords: Altai; Campanula; distribution; diversity; ecology; species A taxonomic study of the genus Campanula L. in the flora of Altai is presented. Based on the data obtained, 14 Campanula species, belonging to 3 subgenera and 7 sections, grow in the territory of the Altai Mountain Country. The subgenus Campanula includes 4 sections and 8 species and is the most diverse in the flora of Altai. An original key is presented to determine the Campanula species in Altai. For each species, nomenclature, ecological and geographical data, as well as information about type material, are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL PROTECTED AREAS of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: AREAS PROTECTED NATIONAL Vladimir Krever, Mikhail Stishov, Irina Onufrenya
    WWF WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation WWF-Russia organizations, with almost 5 million supporters and a global network active in more than 19, bld.3 Nikoloyamskaya St., 100 countries. 109240 Moscow WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a Russia future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: Tel.: +7 495 727 09 39 • conserving the world’s biological diversity Fax: +7 495 727 09 38 • ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable [email protected] • promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. http://www.wwf.ru The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy - the leading conservation organization working around the world to The Nature Conservancy protect ecologically important lands and waters for nature and people. Worldwide Office The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100 NNATIONALATIONAL PPROTECTEDROTECTED AAREASREAS communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters Arlington, VA 22203-1606 they need to survive. Tel: +1 (703) 841-5300 http://www.nature.org OOFF TTHEHE RRUSSIANUSSIAN FFEDERATION:EDERATION: MAVA The mission of the Foundation is to contribute to maintaining terrestrial and aquatic Fondation pour la ecosystems, both qualitatively and quantitatively, with a view to preserving their biodiversity. Protection de la Nature GGAPAP AANALYSISNALYSIS To this end, it promotes scientific research, training and integrated management practices Le Petit Essert whose effectiveness has been proved, while securing a future for local populations in cultural, 1147 Montricher, Suisse economic and ecological terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia
    #1 Central Asia Snow leopard. All three big cats in the region – Persian leopard, Asiatic cheetah and snow leopard – are threatened by illegal hunting. Hunting of the cats' natural prey also causes starvation and increases the likelihood of attacks on domestic animals. 14 | | 15 Contents #1 3 _ Ongoing conservation efforts 54 List of figures 18 List of tables 18 3.1 Government 56 List of boxes 18 3.1.1 Institutions for conservation 56 List of abbreviations and acronyms 18 3.1.2 Protected areas 59 3.1.3 Transboundary initiatives 60 3.1.4 Wildlife law enforcement 62 3.1.5 National and local policies 63 0 _ Executive summary 20 3.1.6 International agreements 66 3.2 Community-based conservation 67 3.3 Civil society 67 1 _ Background 24 3.3.1 CSOs in Central Asia 67 3.3.2 CSO/NGO approaches and projects 68 1.1 Socio-economic setting 26 3.4 Private sector 72 1.1.1 Political and administrative context 26 3.5 International agencies and donors 73 1.1.2 Population and livelihoods 27 1.1.3 Economy 29 1.1.4 Resource ownership and governance 30 1.2 Key biodiversity features 31 4 _ Lessons learned 78 1.2.1 Geography and climate 31 4.1 Protected areas 80 1.2.2 Habitats and ecosystems 32 4.2 Landscape approaches to conservation 81 1.2.3 Species diversity, endemicity and extinction risk 35 4.3 Transboundary initiatives 82 1.2.4 Geographic priorities for conservation 36 4.4 Wildlife crime 82 4.5 Trophy and market hunting 84 4.6 Civil society organisations 85 2 _ Conservation challenges 40 4.7 Biodiversity conservation research 85 4.8 Private sector 85
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Glaciations of the Se Altai, Russia, Based on Geomorphological Data and Absolute Dating of Glacial Deposits in Chagan Reference Section
    GEOCHRONOMETRIA 44 (2017): 49–65 DOI 10.1515/geochr-2015-0059 Available online at http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/geochr Conference Proceedings of the 12th International Conference “Methods of Absolute Chronology” May 11-13th, 2016, Gliwice-Paniówki, Poland PLEISTOCENE GLACIATIONS OF THE SE ALTAI, RUSSIA, BASED ON GEOMORPHOLOGICAL DATA AND ABSOLUTE DATING OF GLACIAL DEPOSITS IN CHAGAN REFERENCE SECTION ANNA R AGATOVA1, 2 and ROMAN K NEPOP1, 2 1Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Russia, 630090 Novosibirsk, Ak. Koptyuga av., 3 2Ural Federal University, Russia, 620002 Yekaterinburg, Mira str., 19 Received 25 June 2016 Accepted 9 February 2017 Abstract: Geomorphological evidence of at least two Pleistocene glacial epochsis noted within the Chagan-Uzun river basin, SE Altai. A review and analysis of all available absolute dates for reference Chagan section is presented. The highest correlation amongst all TL dates is observed for the lens of glacio-lacustrine sediments – the most suitable among glacial deposits for luminescence dating, and indicates its possible Middle Pleistocene age. IRSL dates obtained from feldspar indicate a Middle Pleistocene age of moraines already in the upper part of the section. The small number of obtained IRSL dates does not allow making geochronological reconstructions of the Pleistocene glaciations, but gives the possibility for further experiments with different variation of OSL (IRSL) techniques. Strong low temperature peak in TL signal and strong response to IR stimulation are specific regional quartz features, which could be explained by combination of short transportation distance and low number of depositional cycles for mineral grains. Available radiocarbon dates of carbonate concre- tions from this section are not related to the age of moraine sedimentation and most likely indicate the period of the Chagan river incision into the ancient glacial deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential Breeding Range of Slender-Billed Curlew Numenius Tenuirostris Identified from Stable-Isotope Analysis
    Bird Conservation International (2016) 0 : 1 – 10 . © BirdLife International, 2016 doi:10.1017/S0959270916000551 The potential breeding range of Slender-billed Curlew Numenius tenuirostris identified from stable-isotope analysis GRAEME M. BUCHANAN , ALEXANDER L. BOND , NICOLA J. CROCKFORD , JOHANNES KAMP , JAMES W. PEARCE-HIGGINS and GEOFF M. HILTON Summary The breeding areas of the Critically Endangered Slender-billed Curlew Numenius tenuirostris are all but unknown, with the only well-substantiated breeding records being from the Omsk prov- ince, western Siberia. The identification of any remaining breeding population is of the highest priority for the conservation of any remnant population. If it is extinct, the reliable identification of former breeding sites may help determine the causes of the species’ decline, in order to learn wider conservation lessons. We used stable isotope values in feather samples from juvenile Slender-billed Curlews to identify potential breeding areas. Modelled precipitation δ 2 H data were compared to feather samples of surrogate species from within the potential breeding range, to produce a calibration equation. Application of this calibration to samples from 35 Slender-billed Curlew museum skins suggested they could have originated from the steppes of northern Kazakhstan and part of southern Russia between 48°N and 56°N. The core of this area was around 50°N, some way to the south of the confirmed nesting sites in the forest steppes. Surveys for the species might be better targeted at the Kazakh steppes, rather than around the historically recog- nised nest sites of southern Russia which might have been atypical for the species. We consider whether agricultural expansion in this area may have contributed to declines of the Slender-billed Curlew population.
    [Show full text]
  • Siberia and India: Historical Cultural Affinities
    Dr. K. Warikoo 1 © Vivekananda International Foundation 2020 Published in 2020 by Vivekananda International Foundation 3, San Martin Marg | Chanakyapuri | New Delhi - 110021 Tel: 011-24121764 | Fax: 011-66173415 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.vifindia.org Follow us on Twitter | @vifindia Facebook | /vifindia All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher Dr. K. Warikoo is former Professor, Centre for Inner Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He is currently Senior Fellow, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi. This paper is based on the author’s writings published earlier, which have been updated and consolidated at one place. All photos have been taken by the author during his field studies in the region. Siberia and India: Historical Cultural Affinities India and Eurasia have had close social and cultural linkages, as Buddhism spread from India to Central Asia, Mongolia, Buryatia, Tuva and far wide. Buddhism provides a direct link between India and the peoples of Siberia (Buryatia, Chita, Irkutsk, Tuva, Altai, Urals etc.) who have distinctive historico-cultural affinities with the Indian Himalayas particularly due to common traditions and Buddhist culture. Revival of Buddhism in Siberia is of great importance to India in terms of restoring and reinvigorating the lost linkages. The Eurasianism of Russia, which is a Eurasian country due to its geographical situation, brings it closer to India in historical-cultural, political and economic terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Characteristics in the Organization of Tourist Space Within Mountainous Regions: Altai-Sayan Region (Russia)
    GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites Year XII, vol. 24, no. 1, 2019, p.161-174 ISSN 2065-0817, E-ISSN 2065-1198 DOI 10.30892/gtg.24113-350 COMMON CHARACTERISTICS IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TOURIST SPACE WITHIN MOUNTAINOUS REGIONS: ALTAI-SAYAN REGION (RUSSIA) Aleksandr N. DUNETS Altai State University, Department of Economic Geography and Cartography, Pr. Lenina 61a, 656049 Barnaul, Russia, e-mail: [email protected] Inna G. ZHOGOVA* Altai State University, Department of Foreign Languages, Pr. Lenina 61a, 656049 Barnaul, Russia, e-mail: [email protected] Irina. N. SYCHEVA Polzunov Altai State Technical University, Institute of Economics and Management Pr. Lenina 46, 656038 Barnaul, Russia, e-mail: [email protected] Citation: Dunets A.N., Zhogova I.G., & Sycheva I.N. (2019). COMMON CHARACTERISTICS IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TOURIST SPACE WITHIN MOUNTAINOUS REGIONS: ALTAI- SAYAN REGION (RUSSIA). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 24(1), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.24113-350 Abstract: Tourism in mountainous regions is a rapidly developing industry in many countries. The aims of this paper are to examine global tourism patterns in various mountainous regions and to define the factors that differentiate tourism development in the mountainous environments from tourism development in the lowlands. The authors have taken a regional approach to examining these patterns. They consider the mountainous areas to be a system and recommend analyzing them accordingly. The features of mountainous tourist systems and their associated hierarchies are defined in the study. The study involved creating a diagram to depict the differentiation in the tourist space and to identify the types of tourism represented in mountainous areas throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Mapping of World Grassland Types A
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2014) SYNTHESIS Distribution mapping of world grassland types A. P. Dixon1*, D. Faber-Langendoen2, C. Josse2, J. Morrison1 and C. J. Loucks1 1World Wildlife Fund – United States, 1250 ABSTRACT 24th Street NW, Washington, DC 20037, Aim National and international policy frameworks, such as the European USA, 2NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Drive, Union’s Renewable Energy Directive, increasingly seek to conserve and refer- 7th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203, USA ence ‘highly biodiverse grasslands’. However, to date there is no systematic glo- bal characterization and distribution map for grassland types. To address this gap, we first propose a systematic definition of grassland. We then integrate International Vegetation Classification (IVC) grassland types with the map of Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW). Location Global. Methods We developed a broad definition of grassland as a distinct biotic and ecological unit, noting its similarity to savanna and distinguishing it from woodland and wetland. A grassland is defined as a non-wetland type with at least 10% vegetation cover, dominated or co-dominated by graminoid and forb growth forms, and where the trees form a single-layer canopy with either less than 10% cover and 5 m height (temperate) or less than 40% cover and 8 m height (tropical). We used the IVC division level to classify grasslands into major regional types. We developed an ecologically meaningful spatial cata- logue of IVC grassland types by listing IVC grassland formations and divisions where grassland currently occupies, or historically occupied, at least 10% of an ecoregion in the TEOW framework. Results We created a global biogeographical characterization of the Earth’s grassland types, describing approximately 75% of IVC grassland divisions with ecoregions.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive and Potentially Invasive Plant Species in State Nature Biosphere Reserves of the Altai Republic (Russia)
    Acta Biologica Sibirica, 2019, 5(4), 73-82, doi: https://doi.org/10.14258/abs.v5.i4.7059 RESEARCH ARTICLE Invasive and potentially invasive plant species in State Nature Biosphere Reserves of the Altai Republic (Russia) I. A. Artemov¹,²*, E. Yu. Zykova¹ ¹Central Siberian Botanical Garden, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Novosibirsk, Russia ²Katunskiy State Nature Biosphere Reserve Ust’-Koksa, Altai Republic, Russia E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] In the Altaiskiy and Katunskiy State Nature Biosphere Reserves we registered 44 alien plant species, which were considered in Siberia as invasive and potentially invasive. Among them, there were 30 xenophytes and 14 ergasiophytes species. Rumex acetosella L., Impatiens glandulifera Royle, Galinsoga ciliata (Rafin.) Blake, and Strophiostoma sparsiflorum (Mikan ex Pohl) Turcz. are considered invasive in the Altaiskiy Reserve because they actively spread there in natural and seminatural plant communities and habitats. Most of the species had appeared in the territories of the reserves before their establishment as a result of agricultural activity or appeared after their establishment because of activity of the reserves themselves. Despite of a big amount of tourists in the reserves, the invasive and potentially invasive plants are absent on the ecological paths at present. Keywords: alien plant species; invasive plant species; Altaiskiy Reserve; Katunskiy Reserve; recreation Introduction Invasion of alien species is the global problem, which is strengthening in XXI century (Tittensor et al. 2014; Early et al. 2016). By now 14000 alien plant species are known, 13000 of which have already naturalized in at least one region of the world (van Kleunen et al., 2015, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS of ALTAI a Treasure of Biodiversity and Culture Publisher: Altai Alliance
    THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI A Treasure of Biodiversity and Culture Publisher: Altai Alliance Produced by: Pacific Environment Written by: Jennifer Castner and Pacific Environment Senior Editor and Production Manager: Meerim Kylychbekova Contributors: Chagat Almashev, Matt Foley, Gleb Raygorodetsky, Don Weeden Editors: David Gordon, Leah Zimmerman, Michael Martin Contact: [email protected] Copyright 2009 Cover Photos: Carol Hiltner, World Wildlife Fund, Ashley Tindall (top), Flickrcc/Ilya Schurov (middle), Meerim Kylychbekova (bottom). Design: Design Action Collective THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI A Treasure of Biodiversity and Culture 1 THE GOLDEN MOUNTAINS OF ALTAI Introduction Nestled in the Golden Mountains of Altai in south - health, water quality, critical habitat, and the local ern Siberia, the Republic of Altai is a unique blend tourism-based economy. of ancient cultures, stunning landscapes, and extraordinarily high biodiversity. The republic bor - In this paper, we explore why the Altai is a high- ders Mongolia, China, and Kazakhstan, covering priority conservation area, what threats the region 93,000 square kilometers—an area roughly the size faces today, and where the most significant conser - of the state of Indiana. Sacred sites dot the repub - vation opportunities are located. The paper discusses lic’s varied terrain. Its lands include temperate and specific recommendations to engage in and advance boreal forests, dramatic alpine landscapes, rich agri - these conservation opportunities. It focuses on: cultural lands, the wild and scenic Katun River, and • Strengthening cultural and environmental the remote and fragile Ukok Plateau. activism; The republic’s relative isolation and lack of devel - • Promoting alternative energy and green-building opment mean that its landscape and habitats remain technologies; largely intact.
    [Show full text]