How Cubic Equations (And Not Quadratic) Led to Complex Numbers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Cubic Equations (And Not Quadratic) Led to Complex Numbers How Cubic Equations (and Not Quadratic) Led to Complex Numbers J. B. Thoo Yuba College 2013 AMATYC Conference, Anaheim, California This presentation was produced usingLATEX with C. Campani’s BeamerLATEX class and saved as a PDF file: <http://bitbucket.org/rivanvx/beamer>. See Norm Matloff’s web page <http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/~matloff/beamer.html> for a quick tutorial. Disclaimer: Our slides here won’t show off what Beamer can do. Sorry. :-) Are you sitting in the right room? This talk is about the solution of the general cubic equation, and how the solution of the general cubic equation led mathematicians to study complex numbers seriously. This, in turn, encouraged mathematicians to forge ahead in algebra to arrive at the modern theory of groups and rings. Hence, the solution of the general cubic equation marks a watershed in the history of algebra. We shall spend a fair amount of time on Cardano’s solution of the general cubic equation as it appears in his seminal work, Ars magna (The Great Art). Outline of the talk Motivation: square roots of negative numbers The quadratic formula: long known The cubic formula: what is it? Brief history of the solution of the cubic equation Examples from Cardano’s Ars magna Bombelli’s famous example Brief history of complex numbers The fundamental theorem of algebra References Girolamo Cardano, The Rules of Algebra (Ars Magna), translated by T. Richard Witmer, Dover Publications, Inc. (1968). Roger Cooke, The History of Mathematics: A Brief Course, second edition, Wiley Interscience (2005). Victor J. Katz, A History of Mathematics: An Introduction, third edition, Addison-Wesley (2009). Amy Shell-Gellasch and J. B. Thoo, Intersecting Mathematics and History: Topics in Elementary Mathematics from an Historical Viewpoint, in preparation. <http://ms.yccd.edu/cv-and-pubs.aspx#books> Motivation: square roots of negative numbers Myth Many of today’s popular algebra textbooks introduce imaginary numbers along these lines, saying1 The complex number system allows us to solve equations such as x2 + 1 = 0 that have no real number solutions. The implication is that mathematicians became interested in complex numbers because they were unable to solve certain quadratic equations with only the real numbers. 1Elayn Martin-Gay, Beginning & Intermediate Algebra, 5th edition, p. 634. Myth buster The truth is that, as late as the 16th century, when confronted with an equation like x2 + 1 = 0 or x2 + 2x + 2 = 0; one could simply say that the equation has no solution, and that would have been the end of it. Square roots of negative numbers were considered to be “sophistic,” “impossible,” “imaginary,” and “useless” objects. Indeed, imaginary numbers were not understood as late as the 16th century beyond their being a convenient contrivance. The quadratic formula: long known Quadratic problems Ancient Egypt Berlin Papyrus 6619: The area of a square of 100 is equal to that of two smaller squares. The side of one is 2 4 the side of the other . Let me know the sides of 2 3 2 the two unknown squares[ x + ( 4 x) = 100]. Solved by the method of false position. In the solution, the square root of 1 2 16 is taken, yielding 1 4. Ancient Mesopotamia Cuneiform tablet AO 8862 (Louvre, Paris): I have multiplied the length and width so as to make the area. Then I added to the area the amount by which the length exceeds the width, obtaining 3;3. Then I added the length and width together, obtaining 27. What are the length, width, and area[ xy + x − y = 183; x + y = 27]? Often in two unknown quantities; often solved by “completing the square.” The quadratic formula: rhetorical Arabic: Abu Ja’far Muh.ammad ibn-Mus¯ ¯a al-Khw¯arizm¯ı (ca. 780–850) Al-kit¯ab al-muhtas.ar f¯ı h. is¯ab al-jabr wa’l muq¯abala (The Condensed Book on the Calculation of al-Jabr and al-Muqabala) al-Khw¯arizm¯ı (a > 0, b > 0, c > 0) Squares equal to roots ax 2 = bx Squares equal to numbers ax 2 = c Squares and roots equal to numbers ax 2 + bx = c Squares and numbers equal to roots ax 2 + c = bx Roots and numbers equal to squares bx + c = ax 2 x2 + bx = c: q q b b2 b2 b2 b2 b b ! 2 ! 4 ! c + 4 ! c + 4 ! c + 4 − 2 = x The solution is this: you halve the number of roots, which in the present instance yields five. This you multiply by itself; the product is twenty-five. Add this to thirty-nine; the sum is sixty-four. Now take the root of which, which is eight, and subtract from it half the number of roots, which is five; the remainder is three. This is the root of the square which you sought for; the square itself is nine. One square, and ten roots of the same, amount to thirty-nine dirhems. One square, and ten roots of the same, amount to thirty-nine dirhems. The solution is this: you halve the number of roots, which in the present instance yields five. This you multiply by itself; the product is twenty-five. Add this to thirty-nine; the sum is sixty-four. Now take the root of which, which is eight, and subtract from it half the number of roots, which is five; the remainder is three. This is the root of the square which you sought for; the square itself is nine. x2 + bx = c: q q b b2 b2 b2 b2 b b ! 2 ! 4 ! c + 4 ! c + 4 ! c + 4 − 2 = x S A G Al-Khw¯arizm¯ı provided two geometric demonstrations of his solution. This one is most B widely known, and is often used to introduce the method 25 D of completing the square. H b 2 x S A x 2 + bx = c b 2 x 2 x x b x 2 + 2 · x = c 2 B b b2 b2 x 2 + 2 · x + = c + 2 4 4 2 2 b2 b b b b x x + = c + 4 2 2 2 4 H x2 + c = bx: q q q b b2 b2 b2 b b2 b b2 b ! 2 ! 4 ! 4 − c ! 4 − c ! 2 − 4 − c or 2 + c − 4 = x [A] square and twenty-one in numbers are equal to ten roots of the same. Solution: Halve the number of the roots; the half is five. Multiply this by itself; the product is twenty-five. Subtract from this the twenty-one which are connected with the square; the remainder is four. Extract its root; it is two. Subtract this from the half of the roots, which is five; the remainder is three. This is the root of the square which you required, and the square is nine. Or you may add the root to the half of the roots; the sum is seven; this is the root of the square which you sought for, and the square itself is forty-nine. [A] square and twenty-one in numbers are equal to ten roots of the same. Solution: Halve the number of the roots; the half is five. Multiply this by itself; the product is twenty-five. Subtract from this the twenty-one which are connected with the square; the remainder is four. Extract its root; it is two. Subtract this from the half of the roots, which is five; the remainder is three. This is the root of the square which you required, and the square is nine. Or you may add the root to the half of the roots; the sum is seven; this is the root of the square which you sought for, and the square itself is forty-nine. x2 + c = bx: q q q b b2 b2 b2 b b2 b b2 b ! 2 ! 4 ! 4 − c ! 4 − c ! 2 − 4 − c or 2 + c − 4 = x (Handled negative numbers without fanfare.) ax2 + bx = c p p p 4ac + b2 − b c ! 4ac ! 4ac + b2 ! 4ac + b2 ! 4ac + b2 − b ! = x 2a India Brahmagupta (598–670): tells how to solve quadratic equations by completing the square Take the absolute number from the side opposite to that from which the square and simple unkown are to be subtracted. To the absolute number multiplied by four times the [coefficient of the] square, add the square of the [coefficient of the] middle term; the square root of the same, less the [coefficient of the] middle term, being divided by twice the [coefficient of the] square is the [value of the] middle term. p p p 4ac + b2 − b c ! 4ac ! 4ac + b2 ! 4ac + b2 ! 4ac + b2 − b ! = x 2a India Brahmagupta (598–670): tells how to solve quadratic equations by completing the square Take the absolute number from the side opposite to that from which the square and simple unkown are to be subtracted. To the absolute number multiplied by four times the [coefficient of the] square, add the square of the [coefficient of the] middle term; the square root of the same, less the [coefficient of the] middle term, being divided by twice the [coefficient of the] square is the [value of the] middle term. (Handled negative numbers without fanfare.) ax2 + bx = c p p p 4ac + b2 − b ! 4ac ! 4ac + b2 ! 4ac + b2 ! 4ac + b2 − b ! = x 2a India Brahmagupta (598–670): tells how to solve quadratic equations by completing the square Take the absolute number from the side opposite to that from which the square and simple unkown are to be subtracted. To the absolute number multiplied by four times the [coefficient of the] square, add the square of the [coefficient of the] middle term; the square root of the same, less the [coefficient of the] middle term, being divided by twice the [coefficient of the] square is the [value of the] middle term.
Recommended publications
  • Symmetry and the Cubic Formula
    SYMMETRY AND THE CUBIC FORMULA DAVID CORWIN The purpose of this talk is to derive the cubic formula. But rather than finding the exact formula, I'm going to prove that there is a cubic formula. The way I'm going to do this uses symmetry in a very elegant way, and it foreshadows Galois theory. Note that this material comes almost entirely from the first chapter of http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~masda/MA3D5/Galois.pdf. 1. Deriving the Quadratic Formula Before discussing the cubic formula, I would like to consider the quadratic formula. While I'm expecting you know the quadratic formula already, I'd like to treat this case first in order to motivate what we will do with the cubic formula. Suppose we're solving f(x) = x2 + bx + c = 0: We know this factors as f(x) = (x − α)(x − β) where α; β are some complex numbers, and the problem is to find α; β in terms of b; c. To go the other way around, we can multiply out the expression above to get (x − α)(x − β) = x2 − (α + β)x + αβ; which means that b = −(α + β) and c = αβ. Notice that each of these expressions doesn't change when we interchange α and β. This should be the case, since after all, we labeled the two roots α and β arbitrarily. This means that any expression we get for α should equally be an expression for β. That is, one formula should produce two values. We say there is an ambiguity here; it's ambiguous whether the formula gives us α or β.
    [Show full text]
  • A Quartically Convergent Square Root Algorithm: an Exercise in Forensic Paleo-Mathematics
    A Quartically Convergent Square Root Algorithm: An Exercise in Forensic Paleo-Mathematics David H Bailey, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, USA DHB’s website: http://crd.lbl.gov/~dhbailey! Collaborator: Jonathan M. Borwein, University of Newcastle, Australia 1 A quartically convergent algorithm for Pi: Jon and Peter Borwein’s first “big” result In 1985, Jonathan and Peter Borwein published a “quartically convergent” algorithm for π. “Quartically convergent” means that each iteration approximately quadruples the number of correct digits (provided all iterations are performed with full precision): Set a0 = 6 - sqrt[2], and y0 = sqrt[2] - 1. Then iterate: 1 (1 y4)1/4 y = − − k k+1 1+(1 y4)1/4 − k a = a (1 + y )4 22k+3y (1 + y + y2 ) k+1 k k+1 − k+1 k+1 k+1 Then ak, converge quartically to 1/π. This algorithm, together with the Salamin-Brent scheme, has been employed in numerous computations of π. Both this and the Salamin-Brent scheme are based on the arithmetic-geometric mean and some ideas due to Gauss, but evidently he (nor anyone else until 1976) ever saw the connection to computation. Perhaps no one in the pre-computer age was accustomed to an “iterative” algorithm? Ref: J. M. Borwein and P. B. Borwein, Pi and the AGM: A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity}, John Wiley, New York, 1987. 2 A quartically convergent algorithm for square roots I have found a quartically convergent algorithm for square roots in a little-known manuscript: · To compute the square root of q, let x0 be the initial approximation.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving Cubic Polynomials
    Solving Cubic Polynomials 1.1 The general solution to the quadratic equation There are four steps to finding the zeroes of a quadratic polynomial. 1. First divide by the leading term, making the polynomial monic. a 2. Then, given x2 + a x + a , substitute x = y − 1 to obtain an equation without the linear term. 1 0 2 (This is the \depressed" equation.) 3. Solve then for y as a square root. (Remember to use both signs of the square root.) a 4. Once this is done, recover x using the fact that x = y − 1 . 2 For example, let's solve 2x2 + 7x − 15 = 0: First, we divide both sides by 2 to create an equation with leading term equal to one: 7 15 x2 + x − = 0: 2 2 a 7 Then replace x by x = y − 1 = y − to obtain: 2 4 169 y2 = 16 Solve for y: 13 13 y = or − 4 4 Then, solving back for x, we have 3 x = or − 5: 2 This method is equivalent to \completing the square" and is the steps taken in developing the much- memorized quadratic formula. For example, if the original equation is our \high school quadratic" ax2 + bx + c = 0 then the first step creates the equation b c x2 + x + = 0: a a b We then write x = y − and obtain, after simplifying, 2a b2 − 4ac y2 − = 0 4a2 so that p b2 − 4ac y = ± 2a and so p b b2 − 4ac x = − ± : 2a 2a 1 The solutions to this quadratic depend heavily on the value of b2 − 4ac.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Complex Numbers
    Chapter 5 Complex numbers Why be one-dimensional when you can be two-dimensional? ? 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 − − − ? We begin by returning to the familiar number line, where I have placed the question marks there appear to be no numbers. I shall rectify this by defining the complex numbers which give us a number plane rather than just a number line. Complex numbers play a fundamental rˆolein mathematics. In this chapter, I shall use them to show how e and π are connected and how certain primes can be factorized. They are also fundamental to physics where they are used in quantum mechanics. 5.1 Complex number arithmetic In the set of real numbers we can add, subtract, multiply and divide, but we cannot always extract square roots. For example, the real number 1 has 125 126 CHAPTER 5. COMPLEX NUMBERS the two real square roots 1 and 1, whereas the real number 1 has no real square roots, the reason being that− the square of any real non-zero− number is always positive. In this section, we shall repair this lack of square roots and, as we shall learn, we shall in fact have achieved much more than this. Com- plex numbers were first studied in the 1500’s but were only fully accepted and used in the 1800’s. Warning! If r is a positive real number then √r is usually interpreted to mean the positive square root. If I want to emphasize that both square roots need to be considered I shall write √r.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Survey of Methods of Solving Cubic Equations Minna Burgess Connor
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 7-1-1956 A historical survey of methods of solving cubic equations Minna Burgess Connor Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Recommended Citation Connor, Minna Burgess, "A historical survey of methods of solving cubic equations" (1956). Master's Theses. Paper 114. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A HISTORICAL SURVEY OF METHODS OF SOLVING CUBIC E<~UATIONS A Thesis Presented' to the Faculty or the Department of Mathematics University of Richmond In Partial Fulfillment ot the Requirements tor the Degree Master of Science by Minna Burgess Connor August 1956 LIBRARY UNIVERStTY OF RICHMOND VIRGlNIA 23173 - . TABLE Olf CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE OUTLINE OF HISTORY INTRODUCTION' I. THE BABYLONIANS l) II. THE GREEKS 16 III. THE HINDUS 32 IV. THE CHINESE, lAPANESE AND 31 ARABS v. THE RENAISSANCE 47 VI. THE SEVEW.l'EEl'iTH AND S6 EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES VII. THE NINETEENTH AND 70 TWENTIETH C:BNTURIES VIII• CONCLUSION, BIBLIOGRAPHY 76 AND NOTES OUTLINE OF HISTORY OF SOLUTIONS I. The Babylonians (1800 B. c.) Solutions by use ot. :tables II. The Greeks·. cs·oo ·B.c,. - )00 A~D.) Hippocrates of Chios (~440) Hippias ot Elis (•420) (the quadratrix) Archytas (~400) _ .M~naeobmus J ""375) ,{,conic section~) Archimedes (-240) {conioisections) Nicomedea (-180) (the conchoid) Diophantus ot Alexander (75) (right-angled tr~angle) Pappus (300) · III.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Formula for the Roots of the General Complex Cubic Polynomial Ibrahim Baydoun
    Analytical formula for the roots of the general complex cubic polynomial Ibrahim Baydoun To cite this version: Ibrahim Baydoun. Analytical formula for the roots of the general complex cubic polynomial. 2018. hal-01237234v2 HAL Id: hal-01237234 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01237234v2 Preprint submitted on 17 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Analytical formula for the roots of the general complex cubic polynomial Ibrahim Baydoun1 1ESPCI ParisTech, PSL Research University, CNRS, Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cit´e, Institut Langevin, 1 rue Jussieu, F-75005, Paris, France January 17, 2018 Abstract We present a new method to calculate analytically the roots of the general complex polynomial of degree three. This method is based on the approach of appropriated changes of variable involving an arbitrary parameter. The advantage of this method is to calculate the roots of the cubic polynomial as uniform formula using the standard convention of the square and cubic roots. In contrast, the reference methods for this problem, as Cardan-Tartaglia and Lagrange, give the roots of the cubic polynomial as expressions with case distinctions which are incorrect using the standar convention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Equation-Solving: Linear, Quadratic, and Cubic
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 2006 The evolution of equation-solving: Linear, quadratic, and cubic Annabelle Louise Porter Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Porter, Annabelle Louise, "The evolution of equation-solving: Linear, quadratic, and cubic" (2006). Theses Digitization Project. 3069. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/3069 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EVOLUTION OF EQUATION-SOLVING LINEAR, QUADRATIC, AND CUBIC A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degre Master of Arts in Teaching: Mathematics by Annabelle Louise Porter June 2006 THE EVOLUTION OF EQUATION-SOLVING: LINEAR, QUADRATIC, AND CUBIC A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Annabelle Louise Porter June 2006 Approved by: Shawnee McMurran, Committee Chair Date Laura Wallace, Committee Member , (Committee Member Peter Williams, Chair Davida Fischman Department of Mathematics MAT Coordinator Department of Mathematics ABSTRACT Algebra and algebraic thinking have been cornerstones of problem solving in many different cultures over time. Since ancient times, algebra has been used and developed in cultures around the world, and has undergone quite a bit of transformation. This paper is intended as a professional developmental tool to help secondary algebra teachers understand the concepts underlying the algorithms we use, how these algorithms developed, and why they work.
    [Show full text]
  • Aryabhatiya with English Commentary
    ARYABHATIYA OF ARYABHATA Critically edited with Introduction, English Translation. Notes, Comments and Indexes By KRIPA SHANKAR SHUKLA Deptt. of Mathematics and Astronomy University of Lucknow in collaboration with K. V. SARMA Studies V. V. B. Institute of Sanskrit and Indological Panjab University INDIAN NATIONAL SCIENCE ACADEMY NEW DELHI 1 Published for THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE COMPILATION OF HISTORY OF SCIENCES IN INDIA by The Indian National Science Academy Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi— © Indian National Science Academy 1976 Rs. 21.50 (in India) $ 7.00 ; £ 2.75 (outside India) EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Chairman : F. C. Auluck Secretary : B. V. Subbarayappa Member : R. S. Sharma Editors : K. S. Shukla and K. V. Sarma Printed in India At the Vishveshvaranand Vedic Research Institute Press Sadhu Ashram, Hosbiarpur (Pb.) CONTENTS Page FOREWORD iii INTRODUCTION xvii 1. Aryabhata— The author xvii 2. His place xvii 1. Kusumapura xvii 2. Asmaka xix 3. His time xix 4. His pupils xxii 5. Aryabhata's works xxiii 6. The Aryabhatiya xxiii 1. Its contents xxiii 2. A collection of two compositions xxv 3. A work of the Brahma school xxvi 4. Its notable features xxvii 1. The alphabetical system of numeral notation xxvii 2. Circumference-diameter ratio, viz., tz xxviii table of sine-differences xxviii . 3. The 4. Formula for sin 0, when 6>rc/2 xxviii 5. Solution of indeterminate equations xxviii 6. Theory of the Earth's rotation xxix 7. The astronomical parameters xxix 8. Time and divisions of time xxix 9. Theory of planetary motion xxxi - 10. Innovations in planetary computation xxxiii 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Numbers 6.3B
    6.3b Real Numbers Lesson Tutorials A cube root of a number is a number that when multiplied by itself, and then multiplied by itself again, equals the given number. A perfect cube is a number that can be written as the cube of an integer. EXAMPLE 1 Finding Cube Roots Find the cube root of each number. a. 8 b. −27 2 ⋅ 2 ⋅ 2 = 8 −3 ⋅ (−3) ⋅ (−3) = −27 So, the cube root of 8 is 2. So, the cube root of − 27 is − 3. 3 — The symbol √ is used to represent a cube root. Cubing a number and fi nding a cube root are inverse operations. Use this relationship to solve equations involving cubes. EXAMPLE 2 Solving an Equation Find the surface area of the cube. Volume ä 125 ft3 Use the formula for the volume of a cube to fi nd the side length s. Remember s V = s 3 Write formula for volume. The volume V of a cube = 3 with side length s is 125 s Substitute 125 for V. 3 — — given by V = s . The 3 3 3 s √ 125 = √ s Take the cube root of each side. surface area S is given s by S = 6s 2. 5 = s Simplify. The side length is 5 feet. Use a formula to fi nd the surface area of the cube. S = 6s 2 Write formula for surface area. = 6(5)2 Substitute 5 for s. = 150 Simplify. The surface area of the cube is 150 square feet. Find the cube root of the number. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • And Cubic Equations by the Odd Number Method 1
    Calculating Machine Solution of Quadratic and Cubic Equations by the Odd Number Method 1. Introduction. Eastlack1 has published a method for the solution of quadratic equations by means of a calculating machine. His process is ex- tended here to the solution of cubic equations. In the ordinary manual operation of calculating machines, the use of the method of solving cubic equations presented here will not be found to be as convenient as the use of certain other methods, such as that of Newton. The method is described here, however, in the belief that it may find application in large scale, automatic computing machines (such as the IBM Sequence Controlled Calculator or the ENIAC) where a large number of operations is not objec- tionable, provided that the operations are repetitive and sufficiently simple. We limit our discussion to real roots. Eastlack's method of solving quadratic equations is first reviewed so that the extension of the method to cubic equa- tions may be clearer. 2. Extraction of square roots by the odd number method. The ordinary method for finding on the calculating machine the square root of a number of 3 or 4 digits of the form (10* + y)2 = 100*2 + 20*y + y1 consists in removing the 100*2 term by subtracting the x odd numbers, 1, 3, 5, • • -, (2x — 1), from the first one or two digits of (10* + y)2, and then removing the remainder of (10* + y)2 by subtracting the y numbers, (20* + 1), (20* + 3), • • -, (20* + 2y - 1). This process of square root extraction may evidently be extended to the evaluation of roots having more than two digits.
    [Show full text]
  • Vedic Math Seminar
    Seminar on Vedic Mathematics Dr. Chandrasekharan Raman December 5, 2015 Bridgewater Temple Hall, NJ Ancient Indian Mathematics • Sulba Sutras (700 BC) – rational approximation to √2, proof to Pythagoras theorem etc. • Pingala’s Chandas (300 BC) – combinatorics • Jain Mathematicians (300 BC) – concept of infinity and zero (shunya) • Classical period (400 AD – 1600 AD) ▫ Aryabhata – sine table, trigonometry, π ▫ Brahmagupta – cyclic quadrilateral, indeterm Equ. ▫ Bhaskara II – Lilavati, Bijaganita ▫ Madhava – infinite series for π • Excellent source : Wikipedia (Indian Mathematics) Vedic Mathematics What is Vedic Mathematics? “Vedic Mathematics” is the name given to a work in Indian Mathematics by Sri Bharati Krsna Tirthaji (1884-1960). Vedic Math is based on sixteen Sutras or principles What it is not? It is not from the Vedas It is not ancient Why Vedic Mathematics? Gives an insight into the structure of numbers Very much amenable to mental calculations Decimal Number System in Ancient India • The decimal number system – representing numbers in base 10, was a contribution to the world by Indians • The Place Value System was also a contribution of India Name Value Name Value Eka 100 Arbudam 107 Dasa 101 Nyarbudam 108 Shatam 102 Samudra 109 Sahasram 103 Madhyam 1010 Ayutam 104 Anta 1011 Niyutam 105 Parardha 1012 Prayutam 106 Maths in day-to-day life of a vendor in India 1 11 21 31 41 • You buy some stuff from 2 12 22 32 42 a vendor for Rs 23 3 13 23 33 43 • You pay a 50-rupee note 4 14 24 34 44 5 15 25 35 45 • He pays you back 6
    [Show full text]
  • Equation Solving in Indian Mathematics
    U.U.D.M. Project Report 2018:27 Equation Solving in Indian Mathematics Rania Al Homsi Examensarbete i matematik, 15 hp Handledare: Veronica Crispin Quinonez Examinator: Martin Herschend Juni 2018 Department of Mathematics Uppsala University Equation Solving in Indian Mathematics Rania Al Homsi “We owe a lot to the ancient Indians teaching us how to count. Without which most modern scientific discoveries would have been impossible” Albert Einstein Sammanfattning Matematik i antika och medeltida Indien har påverkat utvecklingen av modern matematik signifi- kant. Vissa människor vet de matematiska prestationer som har sitt urspring i Indien och har haft djupgående inverkan på matematiska världen, medan andra gör det inte. Ekvationer var ett av de områden som indiska lärda var mycket intresserade av. Vad är de viktigaste indiska bidrag i mate- matik? Hur kunde de indiska matematikerna lösa matematiska problem samt ekvationer? Indiska matematiker uppfann geniala metoder för att hitta lösningar för ekvationer av första graden med en eller flera okända. De studerade också ekvationer av andra graden och hittade heltalslösningar för dem. Denna uppsats presenterar en litteraturstudie om indisk matematik. Den ger en kort översyn om ma- tematikens historia i Indien under många hundra år och handlar om de olika indiska metoderna för att lösa olika typer av ekvationer. Uppsatsen kommer att delas in i fyra avsnitt: 1) Kvadratisk och kubisk extraktion av Aryabhata 2) Kuttaka av Aryabhata för att lösa den linjära ekvationen på formen 푐 = 푎푥 + 푏푦 3) Bhavana-metoden av Brahmagupta för att lösa kvadratisk ekvation på formen 퐷푥2 + 1 = 푦2 4) Chakravala-metoden som är en annan metod av Bhaskara och Jayadeva för att lösa kvadratisk ekvation 퐷푥2 + 1 = 푦2.
    [Show full text]