DOCSLIB.ORG

October 20, 2008 Planning & Land Use Management Committee C/O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
October 20, 2008 Planning & Land Use Management Committee C/O ...., C:> = ==~ 0 -<:. October 20, 2008 c-J -l Planning & Land Use Management Committee N C/o The Office of the City Clerk 200 N. Spring Street, Room 395 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re: CF# 08-2689, CHC 2008-2708-HCM The Black Cat Bar, 3909 Sunset Boulevard Dear Councilmembers, I'm writing on behalf of the Friends of the Black Cat. There is widespread support for the designation of this site both in Silver Lake and within the LGBT community. And I understand that the application is scheduled to be heard before your committee on October 28th. At the Cultural Heritage Commission meeting on September 18th, the property owner and his representative made statements suggesting that only the front far;ade and sign are historically significant. At the same meeting, Lambert Giesinger of the OHR indicated that any such discussion is premature - and would properly occur only if the site is designated a Monument, and an application is subsequently received for a development project. We understand that the property owner and his representative have submitted correspondence to back up their above statement. This is being submitted to your Committee and to the file to make the point that much more of the site should be considered as historically significant. The Attachment goes in depth on this, but briefly: - The interior of the bar is largely unchanged from the morning of the raid on New Year's Day 1967. We assert that events within the bar-the exchange of New Year's kisses and the subsequent violent seizure and arrest of bar patrons and employees - were historically significant. As such the setting for these events is also significant. These acts were crucial links in the chain of events that led to the appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court and to the unprecedented protest outside the bar on the night of February 11 , 1967. - Primary source material indicates that the bar's parking lot (the eastern portion of the site along Hyperion Avenue), largely unchanged since 1967, was the location of the main protest held on the night of February 11, 1967. Thank you for your consideration, Sincerely, C<J o/{~ Wes Joe, on b~thf the Friends of the Black Cat 932 Mailman Ave., #12, Los Angeles 90026 cc: CD13 (Eric Garcetti, Mitch O'Farrell) Lambert Giesinger, OHR ATTACHMENT to 10/20/08 Letter to the Planning and Land Use Management Committee Regarding CF: 08-2689. CHC 2008-2708-HCM. The Black Cat Bar. 3909 Sunset Blvd. The following is offered to document the historical significance of both the interior of the bar and the parking lot located on the eastern portion of the bar site along Hyperion Avenue. The Interior of the Bar General Layout. Per Building Permit No. LA 78487 (to convert a portion of the former Safeway Market to a beer bar), dated 9/28/64, the bar is described as 20' x 100'. This is close to the width of the bar (21 ') noted on the most recent building permits. This suggests that the bar was not divided into a narrower space and is very close in physical dimensions to what existed at the time ofthe raid in 1967. Perhaps because the site is irregularly shaped the length of the building noted on building permits has been stated as anywhere from 100' to 150'. And the width between 15' and 21'. In any case, it's apparent that the bar has always consisted of a long open box-like space. In Courting Justice, Murdoch and Price note that, "Inside, the rather ordinary tavern was one long room with a handful of tables, a jukebox and a pool table." (Their account of the Black Cat raid and the associated arrests, convictions and cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court was based on the authors' interviews with 4 individuals and a review of court documents and papers). (CJ 143) This was the space where just after midnight, New Year's morning 1967, Charles Talley and another man "kissed on the mouth for three to five seconds." And where Benny Baker, wearing a white dress, had kissed three men for two to five seconds. (CJ.144) These and other kisses prompted the vice officers already in the room to arrest Talley, Baker and ten other men for the felony offense of lewd conduct. (T2 6) Those convicted of this crime were forced to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives. Talley and Baker chose to appeal their convictions all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Where their attorney, Herbert Selwyn, argued for the first time before the Court solely on the basis that homosexuals have the right to equal protection under the law. (CJ 146) The Ceiling The ceiling of the bar currently features an open pipework grid which does:not appear to date from 1967. No information has been uncovered regarding the original ceiling design. The Floor: This is the floor that a bartender was dragged onto during the raid, toppling a patron. The floor a second employee fell onto after being clubbed from behind and kneed. Where, "A stout man in a red wig ... tried to look inconspicuous. He woke on his ·stomach on the floor." With an officer kneeling on his back. (T2 5) Building Permit LA 93812, was issued 4/29/65 for the Black Gat's double faced plastic electric sign. In Box 11 of the permit form, the material of construction for the floor is noted as "Cone." (The earlier permit for the conversion of the market space to a bar does not request such information.) Building Permit LA 19250 was issued 2127/81 for replacing the paneling and resurfacing the stand up bar structure. In Box 12 on this permit form, the floor is noted as being "cement." So to this day, "Le Barcito" does business on the original concrete floor of the bar. The Front Wall: The bar featured a glass front faQade in 1967 (see photo in the application), which has been covered over with plywood. Attachment, PLUM 10/28/08, CF#08-2698, The Black Cat Bar, 3909 Sunset Blvd, 1 The Side Walls: The original plaster walls of the bar are still present under a thin paper covering and a thin layer of wooden wainscoting. The Rear of the Bar: The Tangents article notes that the short order cook was seized early in the raid, and an officer attempted to take him out the back door. This indicates a cooking area existed which has since been removed. The attempt to take the cook out the back door suggests that the cooking area was to the rear of the bar. (T2 5) Alexei Romanoff, owner of the New Faces bar (the other business raided the same night as the Black Cat) until mid 1966, notes that it was typical for bars at the time to incorporate small kitchens and to serve simple meals. This was the case at New Faces Bar in 1966. (Romanoff). The Mezzanine: The rearmost section of the bar is currently occupied by a mezzanine above with restroom facilities and a pool table area below. There is still a rear exit. Building Permit LA80704 dated 1/19/84 (when the occupancy was changed from a sit down to a stand up bar with dancing) notes an existing mezzanine. So it is possible that the mezzanine existed at the time of the raid. In fact, it seems unlikely that a mezzanine constructed without a building permit between 1967 and 1984 in a gay bar would have been allowed to remain without having been required to be legalized in 1984 (rather than noted as "existing"). Especially given that the 1984 building permit was pulled to comply with a City order. Dance Floor: A raised dance floor was added under Building Permit LA80704 dated 1/19/84. This is on the east side of the main room of the bar. The Stand-Up Bar Structure: Jim Highland notes in Tangents, "A bartender was seized by the shoulders, dragged bodily across the bar amid splintering glass and hustled outside where uniformed police waited. A second bartender tried to run, was caught and yanked across the bar, toppling a patron who fell with him to the floor." (T2 5) And per Jim Kepner in "Concern," "Officer Duehring testified that he saw the bartenders kissing one another just after midnight. After the bartenders and several witnesses said Duehring, with some help from Butler, had jerked or shoved two of the bartenders over the bar onto the floor. .. " (C5 2) Building permit No. LA 19250 was issued 2/27/81 to "replace paneling on bar & resurface it." As noted below, the different bar businesses at this location have never been targeted towards a high end clientele. And the bar had a history of being under police surveillance. This makes it likely that the bar structure currently used by Le Barcito is the same bar used by the Black Cat. First, the bars at this location are unlikely to have spent large sums on remodeling. And secondly- if they had, then the change would likely have been recorded by a permit. The permit that is on record is for repaneling and resurfacing the original bar structure. Integrity and Significance of the Interior: The interior of the Black Cat remain largely unchanged from 1967. The main space is still a large open box. The room where New Year's kisses were exchanged and so many were seized, arrested and read their rights. (C5 2) The mezzanine still occupies the upper rear.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet: Establishing Conditions for Lesbian and Gay Intimacy, Nomos, and Citizenship, 1961-1981 William N
    Hofstra Law Review Volume 25 | Issue 3 Article 7 1997 Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet: Establishing Conditions for Lesbian and Gay Intimacy, Nomos, and Citizenship, 1961-1981 William N. Eskridge Jr. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Eskridge, William N. Jr. (1997) "Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet: Establishing Conditions for Lesbian and Gay Intimacy, Nomos, and Citizenship, 1961-1981," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 25: Iss. 3, Article 7. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol25/iss3/7 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eskridge: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet: Establishing Conditions CHALLENGING THE APARTHEID OF THE CLOSET: ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS FOR LESBIAN AND GAY INTIMACY, NOMOS, AND CITIZENSHIP, 1961-1981 William N. Eskridge, Jr.* CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................... 819 I. PROTECTING PRIVATE GAY SPACES: DuE PROCESS AND FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS ....................... 828 A. Due Process Incorporationof the Bill of Rights (CriminalProcedure) ....................... 830 1. The Warren Court's Nationalization of the Rights of Criminal Defendants .............. 830 2. Criminal Procedural Rights as Protections for Homosexual Defendants ....... 832 3. Criminal Procedural Rights and Gay Power ..... 836 B. Substantive Due Process and Repeal or Nullification of Sodomy Laws (The Right to Privacy) .......... 842 C. Vagueness and Statutory Obsolescence ........... 852 1. Sodomy Laws ......................... 855 2. Lewdness and Sexual Solicitation Laws ....... 857 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwendolyn Whiteside …………………………………………………………...…..Page 4
    BACKSTAGE A publication of COMMUNITY SERVICE at AMERICAN BLUES THEATER THE COLUMNIST BACKSTAGE GUIDE 1 BACKSTAGE THE COLUMNIST By David Auburn Directed by Keira Fromm FEATURING Philip Earl Johnson Kymberly Mellen Coburn Goss Ian Paul Custer* Tyler Meredith Christopher Sheard From the Pulitzer and Tony Award-winning author of Proof, The Columnist is a drama about power, the press, sex, and betrayal. At the height of the Cold War, Joe Alsop is the nation’s most influential journalist—beloved, feared, and courted by the Washington world. But as the 1960s dawn and America undergoes dizzying change, the intense political dramas Joe is embroiled in become deeply personal as well. “Gripping and moving” – Variety * Ensemble member of American Blues Theater 2 AMERICAN BLUES THEATER TABLE OF CONTENTS Note from Producing Artistic Director Gwendolyn Whiteside …………………………………………………………...…..Page 4 About Playwright David Auburn..................................................................................................................Page 5 Interview with Playwright David Auburn........................………………….……………………………………………..........Page 6 The Backstory with Actor Ian Paul Custer....……....…………………………....…………………....................................Page 7 About David Halberstam.................................................…………………………………………….………………...……....Page 7 Interview with Actors Philip Earl Johnson and Kymberly Mellen…………………………………………................Pages 8-9 Interview with Costume Designer Christopher J. Neville......…...….....................................................Pages
    [Show full text]
  • Queer History, This: an American Synthesis
    Culture, Society, and Praxis Volume 3 Number 1 Article 6 January 2004 Queer History, This: An American Synthesis Julie Prince California State University, Monterey Bay Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/csp Recommended Citation Prince, Julie (2004) "Queer History, This: An American Synthesis," Culture, Society, and Praxis: Vol. 3 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/csp/vol3/iss1/6 This Main Theme / Tema Central is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culture, Society, and Praxis by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Prince: Queer History, This: An American Synthesis Queer History, This: An American Synthesis By Julie Prince Exploring the roots of Queer history in America, this essay delves into the complexities of historical representations (or lack thereof) of this marginal- ized subculture. With every passing month, new devel- form the duties of females, while women opments, for good or ill, reflect the po- turn men and mate with their own sex!” litical climate surrounding Lesbian, Gay, (Roscoe, 2000, p.2). Denig was com- Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) menting on the social structure of the rights and presence in America. It is an Crow Indians who, like many other Na- election year, and ‘gay marriage’ is cur- tive American tribes, had third/fourth rently the hot issue on the tip of every- gender representations in their social one’s tongue. Turn on your television groups. Long before Denig’s observa- set, and you are likely to see gay and tion, early explorers had witnessed what lesbian comic ‘representations’ on came to be known as the berdache, or nightly sitcoms and programs.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Was a Wide-Open Town
    INTRODUCTION San Francisco Was a Wide-Open Town I think it’s important to realize that San Francisco did not happen after New York or after Stonewall. This was something that developed in San Francisco and evolved because there were a large number of Gay people who just did the traditional American thing of organizing— organizing around people’s interests. Larry Littlejohn, interview, 1990 San Francisco is a seductive city. Perched on the edge of a continent, its beautiful vistas, eccentric characters, and liberal politics reflect both the unruly nature of its frontier-town beginnings and the sophisticated de- sires of an urban metropolis. Sociologists Howard Becker and Irving Horowitz call San Francisco a culture of civility, noting that “devi- ance, like difference, is a civic resource, enjoyed by tourist and resident alike.” 1 But while the strength of the city’s queer communities is world renowned, there are few texts devoted to San Francisco’s gay and les- bian history.2 What follows, as a result, charts new ground. It asks the question “Why San Francisco?” Why do so many people associate San Francisco with homosexuals and homosexuality? In my research—and casual conversations—many answers have emerged. There are the same- sex dances of the Gold Rush era, the city’s location as an international seaport, the homosocial entertainments of the city’s Barbary Coast, the artistic revivals of the turn of the twentieth century, the tradition of vigi- lante law and order, the persistence of civic graft, the strength and di- versity of the city’s immigrant communities, the staunch resistance to anti-sex and anti-alcohol ordinances, the military presence of two world wars, and the bohemian, Beat, and hippie cultures that flourished in the postwar generations.3 But, by and large, when asked “Why San Fran- 1 2 INTRODUCTION cisco?” most people refer to San Francisco’s history of sexual permis- siveness and its function as a wide-open town—a town where anything goes.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles by Dan Luckenbill
    Los Angeles by Dan Luckenbill Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2006 glbtq, Inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com The modern gay civil rights movement may be said to have been born in Los Angeles with the formation of the Mattachine Society and ONE, Inc. in the early 1950s. The glbtq history of the city, now the U.S.'s second largest metropolis, is replete with other cultural, social, and political firsts, with the largest, the best-funded, the Two photographs by longest-lived, and at times the most visible and influential of publications, protests, Angela Brinskele: legal accomplishments, cultural influences, and social and religious organizations. Top: Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa marching in Los Angeles, along with San Francisco and New York, has been at the very center of the 2006 Los Angeles the American glbtq movement for equality. Currently, groups are attempting to Gay Pride Parade. Above: The McDonald/ increase the involvement of racial and ethnic minorities within the city's glbtq Wright Building of the communities. Gay and Lesbian Center in Los Angeles. Maturing of a City Images copyright © 2006 Angela Brinskele, courtesy Angela Until the late twentieth century Los Angeles was often satirized as a place of indolent Brinskele. sunshine, home to a second-rate art form and cult religions. It received scant serious attention when cultural histories were written about U.S. cities. All of this changed when motion pictures became perhaps the most influential art form internationally, when alternative religions came to the forefront, and when it no longer seemed merely hedonistic and mind numbing to enjoy living and working in the beneficent southern California climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Before Stonewall the Making of a Gay and Lesbian Community
    Before Stonewall The Making of a Gay and Lesbian Community Newly Restored in Conjunction with the 50 th Anniversary of the Stonewall Riots Executive Producer: John Scagliotti • Director: Greta Schiller • Co-Director: Robert Rosenberg Produced by Robert Rosenberg, John Scagliotti & Greta Schiller 87 minutes, color, 1984, Documentary {Official Selection – Sundance Film Festival} {Best Historical Cultural Program – Emmy Award} {Best Documentary Feature – Los Angeles Filmex} FIRST RUN FEATURES 630 Ninth Ave. #1213 New York, NY 10036 (212) 243-0600 / Fax (212) 989-7649 Website: www.firstrunfeatures.com Email: [email protected] Synopsis: In 1969 the police raided the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in New York City's Greenwich Village, leading to three nights of rioting by the city's gay community. With this outpouring of courage and unity the gay liberation movement had begun. Before Stonewall pries open the closet door, setting free the dramatic story of the sometimes horrifying public and private existences experienced by LGBT Americans since the early 1900's. Revealing and often humorous, this widely acclaimed film relives the emotionally-charged sparking of the contemporary Lesbian and Gay rights movements, from the events that led to the fevered 1969 riots to many other milestones in the brave fight for acceptance. Experience the fascinating and unforgettable, decade-by-decade history of homosexuality in America through eye-opening historical footage and amazing interviews with those who lived through an often brutal closeted history. Narrated by Rita Mae Brown Groundbreaking interviews with Ann Bannon, Martin Duberman, Allen Ginsberg, Barbara Gittings, Harry Hay, Mabel Hampton, Dr. Evelyn Hooker, Frank Kameny, Audre Lorde, Richard Bruce Nugent, Jose Sarria and many more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marriage Cases-Reversing the Burden of Inertia in a Pluralist Constitutional Democracy
    Foreword: The Marriage Cases-Reversing the Burden of Inertia in a Pluralist Constitutional Democracy William N. Eskridget INTRODUCTION The California Supreme Court has replaced the New York Court of Appeals, the federal Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court as the court at the cutting edge of many issues in American public law. The process of displacement probably began long ago, perhaps as early as 1948, when the California Supreme Court's decision in Perez v. Sharp became the first appellate decision to recognize that state bars to interracial marriage are unconstitutional.' That landmark decision has been followed by a steady stream of others. The latest such decision is In re Marriage Cases, in which a closely divided (4-3) court held that the State's exclusion of same-sex couples from civil marriage violated the state constitution's equal protection 2 guarantee. Chief Justice Ronald George's opinion for the court in the Marriage Cases was significant for three reasons. First, and most important, was the holding: the State could not constitutionally bar same-sex couples from civil marriage. California was not only the second state to recognize same-sex marriage in this way,3 but was the grand prize for the same-sex marriage Copyright © 2009 California Law Review, Inc. California Law Review, Inc. (CLR) is a California nonprofit corporation. CLR and the authors are solely responsible for the content of their publications. t John A. Garver Professor of Jurisprudence, Yale Law School. I appreciate helpful analysis from Hans Johnson, Bruce Cain, and John Ferejohn.
    [Show full text]
  • Movements and Memory: the Making of the Stonewall Myth
    Movements and Memory: The Making of the Stonewall Myth Elizabeth A. Armstrong Suzanna M. Crage Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana University, Bloomington This article examines why the Stonewall riots became central to gay collective memory while other events did not. It does so through a comparative-historical analysis of Stonewall and four events similar to it that occurred in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York in the 1960s. The Stonewall riots were remembered because they were the first to meet two conditions: activists considered the event commemorable and had the mnemonic capacity to create a commemorative vehicle. That this conjuncture occurred in New York in 1969, and not earlier or elsewhere, was a result of complex political developments that converged in this time and place. The success of the national commemorative ritual planned by New York activists depended on its resonance, not only in New York but also in other U.S. cities. Gay community members found Stonewall commemorable and the proposed parade an appealing form for commemoration. The parade was amenable to institutionalization, leading it to survive over time and spread around the world. The Stonewall story is thus an achievement of gay liberation rather than an account of its origins. n the evening of June 27, 1969, New York sexual bar in Greenwich Village. This was not Opolice raided the Stonewall Inn, a homo- unusual: police raids of homosexual bars were common in New York and other American cities in the 1960s. This time, however, bar patrons Direct correspondence to Elizabeth A. Armstrong, fought back instead of passively enduring humil- Department of Sociology, Ballantine Hall 744, 1020 iating treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the the BLACK CAT
    Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC -2008 -2708 -HCM HEARING DATE: September 18, 2008 Location: 3909 W. Sunset Blvd. TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 13 PLACE : City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Silver Lake-Echo Park- 200 N. Spring Street Elysian Valley Los Angeles, CA Area Planning Commission: East Los Angeles 90012 Neighborhood Council: Silver Lake Legal Description: Lot FR1, Block 4, of Childs Heights PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the THE BLACK CAT REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument APPLICANT: Wes Joe and Charles J. Fisher Friends of the Black Cat 932 Maltman Avenue, #12 Los Angeles, CA 90026 OWNER: ROCO Investment Holding LLC 9903 Santa Monica Blvd., #1047 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Nureet and David Cohen 9899 Santa Monica Blvd., #647 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.7 2. Adopt the report findings. S. GAIL GOLDBERG, AICP Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] ________________________ Edgar Garcia, Preservation Planner Office of Historic Resources Attachments: June, 2008 Historic-Cultural Monument Application ZIMAS Report 3909 W. Sunset Blvd. CHC-2008-2708-HCM Page 2 of 3 FINDINGS 1. The property reflects “the broad cultural, economic, or social history of the nation, State or community” for its association with the civil rights movement of homosexuals. 2. The property is identified with “important events in the main currents of national, State or local history” for its association with one of the first documented civil rights demonstrations in the nation concerning the civil rights of homosexuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Chc-2020-3322-Hcm Env-2020-3323-Ce
    Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC-2020-3322-HCM ENV-2020-3323-CE HEARING DATE: June 18, 2020 Location: 1822 West 4th Street TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 1 – Cedillo PLACE : Teleconference (see Community Plan Area: Westlake agenda for login Area Planning Commission: Central information) Neighborhood Council: Westlake North Legal Description: Sun-set Tract, Block D, Lot 9 EXPIRATION DATE: The original 30-day expiration date of June 21, 2020 per Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 22.171.10(e)1 is tolled, and a revised date will be determined pursuant to the Mayor’s March 21, 2020 Public Order Under City of Los Angeles Emergency Authority re: Tolling of Deadlines Prescribed in the Municipal Code and April 17, 2020 Public Order Under City of Los Angeles Emergency Authority re: Tolling HCIDLA Deadlines and Revising Expiration of Emergency Orders PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the MORRIS KIGHT RESIDENCE REQUEST: Declare the property an Historic-Cultural Monument OWNERS: Westlake Apartment Development LLC 8056 Kentwood Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90045 Rafi Ventura Sweetzer Lofts, LLC 6280 West 3rd Street, #335 Los Angeles, CA 90036 APPLICANT: Lisa Brereton c/o AIDS Healthcare Foundation 6255 Sunset Boulevard, 21st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90028 PREPARERS: Kate Eggert and Krisy Gosney GEHPC 6444 Kraft Avenue Los Angeles, CA 91606 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Take the property under consideration as an Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10 because the application and accompanying photo documentation suggest the submittal warrants further investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy Jurisprudence and the Apartheid of the Closet, 1946-1961
    PRIVACY JURISPRUDENCE AND THE APARTHEID OF THE CLOSET, 1946-1961 WILLIAM N. ESKRIDGE, JR.* INTRODU CTION ........................................................................................................ 703 I. TERROR: THE STRAIGHT-THREATENING CLOSET ............................................... 708 A. CriminalLaw: Hunting the Homosexual ................................................... 710 1. Laws to Suppress and Erase the Sex Pervert ...................................... 711 2. Flushing Out the Homosexual: Spies, Decoy Cops, Raids................... 717 3. Anti-Homosexual Panicsand Manias ................................................. 724 B. Employment Law: Subversion, Blackmail, and Immorality in G overnm ent Service .................................................................................... 733 1. Supermania: The Creation of FederalAnti-Homosexual Exclusions, 194 7-1952 ............................................................................................. 733 2. The Federal Witch Hunts, 1953-1961 ........................... 742 3. Witch H unts at the State Level ............................................................ 746 C. State Suppression of Homosexual Association and Expression ................ 753 1. Surveillance and Harassment.............................................................. 754 2. Censorship of Homophile Media .......................................................... 757 3. Closing Down Homosexual Socialization............................................ 761 II. SURVIVAL: THE
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy Jurisprudence and the Apartheid of the Closet, 1946-1961
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 24 Issue 4 Article 1 1997 Privacy Jurisprudence and the Apartheid of the Closet, 1946-1961 William N. Eskridge Jr. [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William N. Eskridge Jr., Privacy Jurisprudence and the Apartheid of the Closet, 1946-1961, 24 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 703 (1997) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol24/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW PRIVACY JURISPRUDENCE AND THE APARTHEID OF THE CLOSET, 1946-1961 William N. Eskridge, Jr. VOLUME 24 SUMMER 1997 NUMBER 4 Recommended citation: William N. Eskridge, Jr., Privacy Jurisprudence and the Apartheid of the Closet, 1946-1961, 24 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 703 (1997). PRIVACY JURISPRUDENCE AND THE APARTHEID OF THE CLOSET, 1946-1961 WILLIAM N. ESKRIDGE, JR.* INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 703 I. TERROR: THE STRAIGHT-THREATENING CLOSET ............................................... 708 A. Criminal Law: Hunting the Homosexual................................................... 710 1. Laws to Suppress and Erase the Sex Pervert ...................................... 711 2. Flushing Out the Homosexual: Spies, Decoy Cops, Raids..................
    [Show full text]