DOCSLIB.ORG

Assebroekse Meersen En Omgeving

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assebroekse Meersen En Omgeving 1 Inhoud 2 INLEIDING ............................................................................................................................. 16 3 ADMINISTRATIEVE GEGEVENS ............................................................................................... 17 3.1.1 SITUERING ..................................................................................................................................... 17 3.1.2 EIGENDOM, ZAKELIJKE EN PERSOONLIJKE RECHTEN ............................................................................... 19 3.1.2.1 Algemene gegevens ................................................................................................................ 19 3.1.3 ERFDIENSTBAARHEDEN, VOORWAARDEN UIT AANKOOPAKTEN, PACHT, GEBRUIKSOVEREENKOMSTEN ............ 20 3.1.3.1 Verkeer koeiedreef ................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.3.2 Protocol integraal waterbeheer .............................................................................................. 20 3.1.3.3 Jacht ........................................................................................................................................ 20 3.1.4 PERCEELSINDELING ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.5 STATUUT VAN DE WEGEN EN WATERLOPEN ......................................................................................... 26 3.1.5.1 Wegen ..................................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.5.2 Waterlopen ............................................................................................................................. 26 3.1.5.3 Andere lijn-infrastructuur ....................................................................................................... 27 3.1.6 PLANOLOGISCH EN JURIDISCH KADER ................................................................................................. 28 3.1.6.1 Het Ruimtelijk Structuurplan Vlaanderen (RSV) ..................................................................... 28 3.1.6.2 Regionaal Stedelijk Gebied Brugge ......................................................................................... 28 3.1.6.3 Hervestigd Agrarisch Gebied (HAG) ........................................................................................ 28 3.1.6.4 Gewestplan ............................................................................................................................. 28 3.1.6.5 Gewestelijk RUP afbakening gewenste open ruimte structuur .............................................. 28 3.1.6.6 Het provinciaal ruimtelijk structuurplan West- Vlaanderen ................................................... 29 3.1.6.7 Gemeentelijk Ruimtelijk Structuurplan Brugge ...................................................................... 29 3.1.6.8 Gemeentelijk Structuur Plan Beernem ................................................................................... 32 3.1.6.9 Gemeentelijk Structuur Plan Oostkamp ................................................................................. 35 3.1.6.10 Vlaams Ecologisch Netwerk (VEN) ........................................................................................ 38 3.1.6.11 Landschapsatlas en andere landschappelijke designaties .................................................... 38 3.1.6.12 Onroerend Erfgoed ............................................................................................................... 38 3.1.7 LANDINRICHTING ............................................................................................................................ 38 3.1.8 ADVIESCOMMISSIE .......................................................................................................................... 38 4 ALGEMENE BESCHRIJVING ..................................................................................................... 39 4.1 ALGEMENE CULTUURHISTORISCHE BESCHRIJVING .............................................................................. 39 4.1.1 STEENTIJD ..................................................................................................................................... 39 4.1.2 METAALTIJDEN EN ROMEINSE TIJD .................................................................................................... 39 1 4.1.3 MIDDELEEUWEN (CA. 500 TOT CA. 1500) ......................................................................................... 40 4.1.3.1 Heerlijkheid en leenhoven ...................................................................................................... 41 4.1.3.2 Religieuze leven ...................................................................................................................... 43 4.1.3.3 Circulaire structuren ............................................................................................................... 43 4.1.3.3.1 Situering ............................................................................................................................... 43 4.1.3.3.2 Cirkels: gewoon concentrisch of zelfs meervoudig circulair ? ............................................. 45 4.1.3.3.3 De concentrische zuidelijke cirkels van Assebroek .............................................................. 49 4.1.3.3.4 Meer dan één circulaire structuur aanwezig ....................................................................... 51 4.1.3.3.5 Kenmerken en voorbeelden van deze meervoudig circulaire structuren ........................... 57 4.1.3.4 De Gemene Weiden, Looweide en Beverhoutsveld ............................................................... 66 4.1.3.4.1 Oorsprong en ontstaan ........................................................................................................ 66 4.1.3.4.2 Landschappelijke evolutie.................................................................................................... 69 4.1.4 16DE – 17DE EEUW .......................................................................................................................... 71 4.1.5 18DE EEUW .................................................................................................................................... 71 4.1.6 19DE EEUW .................................................................................................................................... 72 4.1.7 20STE EEUW.................................................................................................................................... 72 4.1.8 21STE EEUW.................................................................................................................................... 75 4.1.9 TOPONIEMEN VAN STRATEN, WATERWEGEN, BRUGGEN, MOLENS, LEENHOVEN EN PERCELEN ...................... 75 4.2 BEVLOEID OF BEMEST: HOOILAND ALS MIDDELEEUWSE HOOGTECHNOLOGISCHE OPLOSSING VOOR EEN PERMANENTE BODEMVRUCHTBAARHEID OP DE AKKERS .............................................................................. 77 4.2.1 VAN “SLASH AND BURN” NAAR ECHT SEDENTAIRE LANDBOUW ............................................................... 77 4.2.2 HOOILAND: BASISBEGRIPPEN EN EEN OVERMIJDELLIJK STUKJE (CHEMISCHE) ACHTERGRONDINFORMATIE EN ONTGINNINGSPATRONEN. ............................................................................................................................ 79 4.2.3 APRES NOUS LE DÉLUGE: VAN NAT NAAR DROOG.................................................................................. 84 4.2.4 GAVERS IN VLAANDEREN : DEFINITIE EN BESCHRIJVING VAN “HET SYSTEEM” ............................................. 86 4.2.4.1 Wat is een gaver ? ................................................................................................................... 86 4.2.4.2 Ontstaan van de kommen met moeraskalk ............................................................................ 87 4.2.4.3 Terzijde: herkomst van het woord “gavers” ........................................................................... 87 4.2.4.4 Gavers als landschapstype ...................................................................................................... 89 4.2.5 BESPREKING VAN DE ONTGINNINGSGESCHIEDENIS VAN DE ASSEBROEKSE MEERSEN EN OMGEVING ............. 106 4.2.5.1 Meersen ten zuiden van Ver-Assebroek ............................................................................... 106 4.2.5.2 Oedelems grondgebied: Praethoeve en Boelare .................................................................. 108 4.2.5.2.1 Praet ................................................................................................................................... 108 4.2.5.2.2 Boelare ............................................................................................................................... 120 4.2.5.3 Oostkamps grondgebied ....................................................................................................... 121 4.2.5.3.1 Goessegaver en omgeving ................................................................................................. 121 4.2.5.3.2 Schotelaremeers ................................................................................................................ 123 4.2.5.3.3 Chartreuze(meers) ............................................................................................................. 125 4.2.5.3.4 Puypemeerschen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soil and Archaeological Groundworks for Landscape Development Projects of the Flemish Land Agency 309
    307 SOIL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL The case study GROUNDWORKS FOR of Assebroek LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS OF THE FLEMISH LAND AGENCY C. Ampe1 K. Gheysen1 ¹ Vlaamse Landmaatschappij, regio West, Belgium Corresponding author Carole Ampe, [email protected] abstract This paper describes the preliminary soil and archaeological research carried out by the Flemish Land Agency, to achieve a well substantiated project design. At the circular structure of Ver-Assebroek (Bruges), the site of a former medieval castle, a landscape development project aims to increase the visibility of the structure while respecting the soil values and archaeological structures on the site. keywords circular structure, peat, limnic material, land development project doi 10.5281/zenodo.3421067 SOILS AS RECORDS OF PAST AND PRESENT. FROM SOIL SURVEYS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES: RESEARCH STRATEGIES FOR INTERPRETING SOIL CHARACTERISTICS Proceedings of the Geoarchaeological Meeting, Bruges, 6 & 7 November 2019. Edited by J. Deák, C. Ampe and J. Mikkelsen. © Raakvlak 308 SOILS AS RECORDS OF PAST AND PRESENT. FROM SOIL SURVEYS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES: RESEARCH STRATEGIES FOR INTERPRETING SOIL CHARACTERISTICS 1. Introduction to complete the missing links between the green spaces of the cycling network encircling the city. A land develop- In Ver-Assebroek (Bruges, Belgium) a large man-made ment plan was agreed between different governmental circular structure is positioned on the edge of humid partners, town councils, farmers, NGO Natuurpunt, and meadowlands (Assebroekse Meersen) and a dry sandy the Water Board (polder). At Assebroekse Meersen the ridge on which the church of Ver-Assebroek is located. measures consist of restoring the nature values of the hu- Ameryckx (1955) was the first to describe this structure mid meadowlands by improving the water management in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Tragedies: a Flemish Common and Its Commoners Under the Pressure of Social and Economic Change During the Eighteenth Century1 by TINE DE MOOR
    Economic History Review, 62, 1 (2009), pp. 1–22 Avoiding tragedies: a Flemish common and its commoners under the pressure of social and economic change during the eighteenth century1 By TINE DE MOOR Despite the wide application of the metaphor of ‘the tragedy of the commons’, there is little historical literature that points to the weaknesses of its historical basis. There is, however, sufficient qualitative and quantitative evidence to prove that commons were well regulated and organized in order to achieve a sustainable management, that also took into account the needs and wishes of its commoners. This case study of a common in Flanders looks at the evidence for this in the eighteenth century, exam- ining bookkeeping and other archival sources. A model that incorporates the different functions of the commons (sustainability, efficiency, and utility) is explained and applied. n 1968, in his article ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Hardin described how a Imedieval common pasture was over-exploited due to the selfish behaviour of the villagers.2 In his account, all inhabitants of the medieval European village could use the common pasture.There seemed to be no clear restrictions on access to the common, nor on the number of livestock each of the users could put on the common, nor was there a collective management (in terms of use and main- tenance) of the land. Moreover, the commoners seemed not to communicate with each other about the use or management of their common.3 This ‘freedom on the commons’ gave the commoner the incentive to put as many cattle on the common as he possibly could; after all, surely every rational herdsman would conclude that selfish behaviour was the most advantageous strategy for survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils Records Past Present
    SOILS AS RECORDS OF PAST AND PRESENT From soil surveys to archaeological sites: research strategies for interpreting soil characteristics Edited by Judit Deák Carole Ampe Jari Hinsch Mikkelsen Proceedings of the Geoarchaeological Meeting Bruges, 6 & 7 November 2019 This book is published on the occasion of the Geoarchaeological Meeting: Soils as records of Past and Present. From soil surveys to archaeological sites: research strategies for interpreting soil characteristics on 6 & 7 November 2019 in Bruges, Belgium. Editors Judit Deák, Carole Ampe and Jari Hinsch Mikkelsen Technical editor Mariebelle Deceuninck English language reviewer Caroline Landsheere Graphic design Frederick Moyaert Printing & binding Die Keure, Bruges Publisher Raakvlak Archaeology, Monuments and Landscapes of Bruges and Hinterland, Belgium www.raakvlak.be Copyright and photographic credits The printed version of this book is protected by the copyright © Raakvlak. ISBN 978 90 76297 811 This book is a collection of freely available (open access) documents. The book and the papers composing it have individual digital object identifiers (doi, indicated on each paper) and are hosted by the non-commercial depository archive (Zenodo). MUSEA The rightsholders (authors and/or institutions) retain the BRUGGE copyright of their contribution. The online contributions are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike, 4.0 License (CC-BY-SA). The authors of the papers warrant that they have secured the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere and that they identified such objects with appropriate citations and copyright statements, if applicable, in captions or even within the objects themselves. Neither the editors, nor the publisher can in any way be held liable for any copyright complains.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on 50 Years of Mobility Policy in Bruges
    MOBILITEIT REPORT ON 50 YEARS OF MOBILITY POLICY IN BRUGES 4 50 years of mobility policy in Bruges TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction by Burgomaster Dirk De fauw 7 Reading guide 8 Lexicon 9 Research design: preparing for the future, learning from the past 10 1. Once upon a time there was … Bruges 10 2. Once upon a time there was … the (im)mobile city 12 3. Once upon a time there was … a research question 13 1 A city-wide reflection on mobility planning 14 1.1 Early 1970s, to make a virtue of necessity (?) 14 1.2 The Structure Plan (1972), a milestone in both word and deed 16 1.3 Limits to the “transitional scheme” (?) (late 1980s) 18 1.4 Traffic Liveability Plan (1990) 19 1.5 Action plan ‘Hart van Brugge’ (1992) 20 1.6 Mobility planning (1996 – present) 21 1.7 Interim conclusion: a shift away from the car (?) 22 2 A thematic evaluation - the ABC of the Bruges mobility policy 26 5 2.1 Cars 27 2.2 Buses 29 2.3 Circulation 34 2.4 Heritage 37 2.5 Bicycles 38 2.6 Canals and bridges 43 2.7 Participation / Information 45 2.8 Organisation 54 2.9 Parking 57 2.10 Ring road(s) around Bruges 62 2.11 Spatial planning 68 2.12 Streets and squares 71 2.13 Tourism 75 2.14 Trains 77 2.15 Road safety 79 2.16 Legislation – speed 83 2.17 The Zand 86 3 A city-wide evaluation 88 3.1 On a human scale (objective) 81 3.2 On a city scale (starting point) 90 3.3 On a street scale (means) 91 3.4 Mobility policy as a means (not an objective) 93 3.5 Structure planning (as an instrument) 95 3.6 Synthesis: the concept of ‘city-friendly mobility’ 98 3.7 A procedural interlude: triggers for a transition 99 Archives and collections 106 Publications 106 Websites 108 Acknowledgements 108 6 50 years of mobility policy in Bruges DEAR READER, Books and articles about Bruges can fill entire libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils Records Past Present
    SOILS AS RECORDS OF PAST AND PRESENT From soil surveys to archaeological sites: research strategies for interpreting soil characteristics Edited by Judit Deák Carole Ampe Jari Hinsch Mikkelsen Proceedings of the Geoarchaeological Meeting Bruges, 6 & 7 November 2019 This book is published on the occasion of the Geoarchaeological Meeting: Soils as records of Past and Present. From soil surveys to archaeological sites: research strategies for interpreting soil characteristics on 6 & 7 November 2019 in Bruges, Belgium. Editors Judit Deák, Carole Ampe and Jari Hinsch Mikkelsen Technical editor Mariebelle Deceuninck English language reviewer Caroline Landsheere Graphic design Frederick Moyaert Printing & binding Die Keure, Bruges Publisher Raakvlak Archaeology, Monuments and Landscapes of Bruges and Hinterland, Belgium www.raakvlak.be Copyright and photographic credits The printed version of this book is protected by the copyright © Raakvlak. ISBN 978 90 76297 811 This book is a collection of freely available (open access) documents. The book and the papers composing it have individual digital object identifiers (doi, indicated on each paper) and are hosted by the non-commercial depository archive (Zenodo). MUSEA The rightsholders (authors and/or institutions) retain the BRUGGE copyright of their contribution. The online contributions are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike, 4.0 License (CC-BY-SA). The authors of the papers warrant that they have secured the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere and that they identified such objects with appropriate citations and copyright statements, if applicable, in captions or even within the objects themselves. Neither the editors, nor the publisher can in any way be held liable for any copyright complains.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Political Power and Social Groups, C.1300–C.1500
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography 268 7 Political Power and Social Groups, c.1300– c.1500 Jan Dumolyn , Frederik Buylaert , Guy Dupont , Jelle Haemers , and Andy Ramandt At the turn of the fourteenth century, the character of political rule in the major cities of Flanders changed decisively. Around 1280, the manual work- ers who during the thirteenth century had been systematically excluded from the city government, fi nally entered the political stage. Aft er the pop- ular victory of 1302 the craft guilds, especially in the larger urban centres of Bruges and Ghent , gained access to the arenas of political decision- making. Th e cities emerged with new constitutions in which control of the urban government was shared between the old merchant class and the guilds, which were now given new liberties, though the equilibrium between the two would always remain precarious. 1 Guild power became a prominent feature of social and political life, so much so that the late medieval period in Bruges can be justly termed the age of ‘corporatism’, with the city being regarded as a body politic strongly infl uenced by the ‘political guilds’. While this development partly emerged from longer- term economic change, the momentous events around 1300 altered the nature of communal politics. While corporatist ideas and practices of governing the urban body politic borrowed from an earlier communal ideology, aft er 1302 the craft guilds would become, or would at least present themselves as, the embodiment of the urban commune.
    [Show full text]
  • One of the Classic Problems in Social Science Is Known As 'The Dilemma Of
    THE DILEMMA OF THE COMMONERS One of the classic problems in social science is known as ‘the dilemma of the commons’, in which land, water, and other resources held jointly by social or economic segments tend to be depleted sooner and to a greater extent than privately held assets. During the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, many aspects of western European society changed fundamentally, including the abolition of common-property rights, which in itself was related to social, political, and eco- nomic shifts in that same society. This book intends to put the debate on commons, commoners, and the disappearance of both throughout early modern and modern northwestern Europe in a new light, through new approaches and innovative methodologies. Tine De Moor aims to link the historical debate about the long- term evolution of commons to the present-day debates on common-pool resources, as well as touching upon various disciplines within the social sciences that work on commons issues. Tine De Moor is Professor of Institutions for Collective Action in Historical Perspective at Utrecht University. She has published in various top journals on a variety of topics in social and economic history, but most extensively on commons in northwestern Europe. She has won several prizes for her research, including the prize for the best dissertation in the category ‘Medieval and Early Modern Period’ of the International Economic History Association. She is also currently President (2015–2017) of the International Association for the Study of the Commons and the co-founder, former editor-in-chief, and member of the editorial board of the International Journal of the Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruimtelijk-Economische Studie Van Het Kleinstedelijk Gebied Oudenaarde
    RUIMTELIJK-ECONOMISCHE STUDIE VAN HET KLEINSTEDELIJK GEBIED OUDENAARDE JUNI 2014 STUDIE UITGEVOERD IN OPDRACHT VAN PROVINCIE OOST-VLAANDEREN INHOUDSOPGAVE INLEIDING 3 ALGEMENE DOELSTELLING EN STAPPENPLAN 5 DEEL 1: ANALYSE VAN HET AANBOD 7 1. Huidig aanbod aan regionale bedrijventerreinen 7 1.1. Methodologie 7 1.2. Ruimtegebruik - algemeen 10 1.3. Ruimtegebruik per bedrijventerrein 17 1.4. Benchmark 27 1.5. SWOT 28 2. Inventarisatie van de bestaande bedrijvigheid 32 2.1. Aantal bedrijven & type 32 2.2. Tewerkstelling 36 2.3. Omzet/toegevoegde waarde 38 3. Huidig aanbod aan grootschalige detailhandel 39 3.1. Inventarisatie 39 3.2. Aandachtspunten voor de bestaande grootschalige detailhandel 43 4. Analyse van de huidige rol en ambitie van de stad Oudenaarde op het vlak van regionale bedrijvigheid en grootschalige detailhandel 45 4.1. Planningscontext 45 4.2. Beleidscontext 47 DEEL 2: ANALYSE VAN DE VRAAG 49 1. Analyse van de taakstelling vanuit het RSV en het PRS (top-down) 49 2. Analyse van de bedrijvendynamiek (top-down) 49 3. Inventarisatie van de noden en wensen van de bedrijven (bottom-up) 51 3.1. Onlinebevraging bij de bedrijven 51 3.2. Informatie over de vraag op basis van de focusgesprekken 71 3.3. Raming van de vraag naar bedrijfsruimte 75 4. Marktruimteberekening voor grootschalige detailhandel (top-down) 78 5. Benchmarking voor grootschalige detailhandel (top-down) 81 Þ Ruimtelijk-economische studie van het kleinstedelijk gebied Oudenaarde Juni 2014 1 DEEL 3: CONFRONTATIE VAN VRAAG EN AANBOD 89 1. De ruimtebehoefte 89 1.1. De ruimtebehoefte op het vlak van regionale bedrijvigheid 89 1.2. De ruimtebehoefte op het vlak van grootschalige detailhandel 94 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mesolithic in and Around the City of Bruges New Lithic Data from The
    The Mesolithic in and around the city of Bruges N The Mesolithic in and around the city of Bruges otae New lithic data from the excavated sites of Pr Dudzele-Zonnebloemweg, Koolkerke-Arendstraat and ae hi Sint-Michiels-Barrièrestraat (Brugge, West Flanders, BE) sto ri cae , 38 Gunther NOENS, Dieter VERWERFT, Jari H. MIKKELSEN, / Joris SERGANT & Ann VAN BAELEN : 169-19 2018 1. Introduction 0 Fortuitous discoveries of lithic artefacts during recent archaeological fieldwork at Dudzele, Koolkerke and Sint-Michiels have led to a number of small-scale excavations aimed at a more complete recovery of these prehistoric remains. Located within three sub-mu- nicipalities of the city of Bruges, these newly discovered archaeological sites fall within the operating range of the inter-communal archaeological service Raakvlak, an area of more than 600 km² in the extreme north-western part of Belgium (Fig. 1). The sites of Dudzele-Zonnebloemweg and Koolkerke-Arendstraat, to the northeast of the historical city- centre of Bruges, are part of the coastal Polder area whereas Sint-Michiels - Barrièrestraat, located to the southwest of the city-centre, is situated in Sandy Flanders, on top of the large coversand dune of Maldegem-Stekene. Fig. 1 – Map of study area and Mesolithic sites. 169 G. Noens, D. Verwerft, J. H. Mikkelsen, J. Sergant & A. Van Baelen In 2018 Ghent Archaeological Team (GATE) was commissioned by Raakvlak to under- take a study of these three lithic collections, totalling well over 2 700 artefacts (Noens & Sergant, 2018), and the results of these analyses will be discussed briefly in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02216-4 - The Dilemma of the Commoners: Understanding the Use of Common-pool Resources in Long-term Perspective Tine De Moor Index More information Index aanborgers, 39, 103, 104, 105, 109, 125, age at subscription, 109, 133, 134, 148, 150, 126, 128, 131, 133, 135, 136, 138, 156 144, 148 aging, 163 aanborgers., 103 agrarian depression of 1650–1750, 78 aangelanden,69 agreements, 75, 76, 77, 95, 141, 153, 155 aard, 68, 69, 74, 75, 85 agricultural development, 78, 110 Aard van de Zes Dorpen, 37, 44, 67 promotion of, 78 aardbrieven,85 agricultural history, 84 aardheide,68 agricultural methods, 26 abbey of Saint Trudo, 101 agricultural policy, 78 abundance and scarcity agricultural produce, 21, 54, 62, 73, 78, 79, laws of, 87 142, 160 access increase of, 21, 73, 78 reulation of, 35 prices of, 142 access conditions, 88, 89, 90, 93 agricultural productivity, 66, 114, 141 basic, 89, 90 agricultural system, 84, 115, 156 descendance, 82, 90, 103, 104, 143 changes in the, 73 financial, 91, 105 agriculture, 21, 26, 61, 63, 64, 65, socio-economic, 90 66, 73, 78, 81, 84, 87, 109, supplementary, 89, 90 110, 112, 115, 117, 135, 136, 139, access rights, 90, 98, 143 153, 156 limitation of, 9, 14, 35, 37, 98, 103, intensification of, 78 104, 105, 111, 121, 143, 144, 152, alliances, 3, 18, 25 157, 162 Alpertus of Metz, 28 regulation of, 105 altum dominium, 76, 106 access rules, 35, 36, 90, 111 amborchteghe. See aanborgers account books, 95, 106, 107, 110, 127, 140, ambuerdeghe.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan - Synopsis Approved by City Council on July 6Th 2012
    BRUGES, UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY Management plan - synopsis Approved by City Council on July 6th 2012 BRUGES urban planning department sector UNESCO, christus-koning & lissewege department for heritage conservation & heritage management BRUGES, UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE PROPERTY Management plan - synopsis Approved by City Council on July 6th 2012 1 THE STUDY REPORT FOR A “STATE OF CONSERVATION” AND THE ELABORATION OF A “MANGEMENTPLAN “ IS THE INITIATIVE OF: The City Council of Bruges, Urban Planning Department, UNESCO sector, Christus Koning & Lissewege and the Department for Heritage Conservation & Heritage Management Team SumResearch Under the direction of Paul Lievevrouw, chairman of SumProject & SumResearch Project leader: Brecht Vandekerckhove, director of SumResearch with the co-operation of: Marieke De Baerdemaeker, Niels De Luyck, Myron Devolder, Wim Geeroms, Kevin Pycke, Luca Visconti & Ivonne Weichold in collaboration with the advisary teams of: Raymond Lemaire International Centre for Conservation (RLICC): prof. Christian Ost, prof. Koen Van Balen, prof. Barbara Van der Wee, prof. Luc Verpoest, prof. Minja Yang The Royal Commission for Monuments and Sites (RCMS): prof. Anne Mie Draye Members of the UNESCO Committee of experts: Dr. Stéphane Demeter, Prof. Em. Dr. Ir. Arch. Luc Verpoest, Prof. dr. Linda Van Santvoort, architect Bob Van Reeth, architect Jos Vandenbreeden, Prof.dr. Eric Corijn, architect Mrs Livia de Bethune, heritage expert Mrs Sybille Valcke, ir. architect Luc Constandt, arch. Ingrid Leye, secretary of the ECU and Mrs Brigitte Beernaert, heritage expert Inventory team: Urban Planning Department , sector UNESCO, Christus Koning & Lissewege, Department for Heritage Conservation & Heritage Management Ingrid Leye, acting head of sector UNESCO and Department for Heritage Conservation & Heritage Management Brigitte Beernaert, Joris Nauwelaerts & Sofie Baert, heritage team Korneel Morlion, planner and Luc Meulemeester & Philippe Mabilde, sector UNESCO urban planning team SUMMARY MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 Contents INTRODUCTION 5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 18Th-19Th Century)
    M. De Moor, The travesty of a common, WOW3 (June 2-6, 2004) 1 WOW3 (June 2-6, 2004) BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA Panel 2A: Commons of the Low Lands, IMU, Dogwood Room Working Paper The travesty of a common. The management and use of a common in a changing Flanders (18th-19th century) M. De Moor-Ghent University (Belgium) Department of Early Modern History University of Ghent, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Gent ([email protected]) ©2004 Martina De Moor M. De Moor, The travesty of a common, WOW3 (June 2-6, 2004) 2 REMARK: the following graphs van be found in separate documents Figure 1: The three-dimensional approach to commons..............................................................5 Figure 2: Hypotheses on the use, management and users of commons........................................9 Figure 3: Map of the province of Western Flanders with the location (green areas) of the case study, the Gemene and Loweiden...........................................................................................12 Figure 4: Exploitation level of the common (used for grazing by horses, cows and pigs), 1700- 1840..................................................................................................................................20 Figure 5: Evolution of the balance.............................................................................................22 Debating the commons The problems accompanying –but not necessarily caused by- the common use of goods have been the object of social and scientific debates since Antiquity.1 Commons have
    [Show full text]