DOCSLIB.ORG

National Science Board: Vision 2030

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Science Board: Vision 2030 NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD 2 VISION 2030 VISION 2030 3 VISION 2030 Cover Photo Credit: May 2020 Getty Images Report #: NSB-2020-15 4 VISION 2030 VISION 2030 5 The U.S. has made the investments The U.S. has needed to fuel an increased STEM innovation economy skills in its workforce, and remain preeminent creating more in science and opportunities for engineering. all Americans. U.S. scientists and engineers are modeling scientific values that are practiced The U.S. throughout remains a the world. magnet for the The U.S. has world’s best created an accessible, talent. attractive S&E enterprise that more closely reflects the nation’s demographic and geographic diversity. U.S. government, VISION industry, and academic partners are working in coordination to realize national R&D priorities and accelerate FOR THE the discovery-to- innovation cycle. NSF continues to drive U.S innovation FUTURE through fundamental research and lead the This report lays out what the National Science Board evolution of the global believes the U.S. must do to achieve this vision and remain practice of science the world innovation leader in 2030. and engineering. 6 VISION 2030 VISION 2030 7 GLOBALIZATION OF S&E than in 2000,4 the share of basic research that is federally funded declined from 58% S&E is now a truly worldwide enterprise, to 42% during that period. Basic research with more players and opportunities, from across all fields of S&E, performed primarily at which humanity’s collective knowledge is colleges and universities and funded by federal growing rapidly. This dynamic research and investments, is an important innovation engine development (R&D) landscape is characterized that fuels subsequent research across the by interdependence as well as competition. S&E ecosystem, by both private industry and While the U.S. S&E enterprise continues to mission-oriented agencies such as NASA and grow in absolute terms, the data show that the Department of Defense. the global S&E enterprise is growing faster and consequently the U.S. share of discovery KEY QUESTION: How can American is dropping (see Figure 1). The U.S., which led discoveries continue to empower U.S. the world in total R&D investment for decades, businesses and entrepreneurs to likely ceded this status to China in 2019. If succeed globally? these trends continue, NSB projects that China will invest over $200 billion a year more in R&D DEMAND FOR STEM TALENT than the U.S. by 2030. A bright spot amongst A CASE these concerning trends is that the U.S. has a Worldwide demand for STEM-capable significant lead in fundamental research – the (Science, Technology, Engineering, and seed corn for America’s entire S&E enterprise.1 Mathematics) workers keeps growing, driven by international opportunities and competition, FOR KEY QUESTION: How can America keep and by rapid increases in the number of jobs its lead in fundamental research? that require STEM skills, including in lines of work that historically did not require S&E URGENCY GROWTH OF KNOWLEDGE- knowledge. This situation will only become AND TECHNOLOGY- more urgent: by 2026, S&E jobs are predicted INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES to grow by 13% compared with 7% growth in United States (U.S.) leadership in science only explorers. Science and engineering the overall U.S. workforce.5 Yet even as STEM and engineering (S&E) has shaped – particularly fundamental research Global R&D investments have tripled since competencies have become more essential, Americans’ way of life for seven decades, conducted transparently and openly – 2000, reflecting increased activity and U.S. K-12 mathematics and science scores are contributing to the nation’s economic benefits the entire world. Yet if the U.S. is competition in knowledge- and technology- well below those of many other nations and 2 prosperity and ensuring its national security. to ensure a strong economy and national intensive industries. In the U.S. such industries have stagnated.6 Women and underrepresented The U.S. S&E ecosystem, built on federally security, it is vital that a significant share account for 17% of Gross Domestic Product minorities remain inadequately represented funded fundamental research, has led to of future scientific breakthroughs and and generate $2.7 trillion in output, outpacing in S&E relative to their proportions in the U.S. 3 innovation and new industries, revolutionized world-changing innovations be made any other sector. Today’s R&D intensive population. The rapid growth of S&E jobs health care, promoted peace, created the here. In this new era, the National Science industries exist, in part, because of discoveries and demographic changes have outpaced mobile digital world, and transformed nearly Board (Board, NSB) sees three trends that arising from basic research that the federal the progress that has been made in the every aspect of Americans’ lives. threaten the nation’s S&E leadership. government funded decades ago, well before participation of these groups in S&E. the research had a known application. Although Today, science continues to be the endless inflation-adjusted federal basic research KEY QUESTION: How can the U.S. frontier, but U.S. researchers are not the expenditures are only slightly lower in 2017 increase STEM skills and opportunities for all Americans? 8 VISION 2030 VISION 2030 9 In this report, the NSB highlights four address the key questions posed above.7 elements of S&E leadership that are The NSB commits to working with all FIGURE 1: AMERICA’S SHARE OF R&D DECREASING essential to the U.S. remaining the world stakeholders in our S&E enterprise – AS GLOBAL S&E GROWS leader in innovation in 2030: Practice including Congress, the Administration, of Science and Engineering, Talent, federal agencies, state and local While the U.S. investment in R&D continues to grow in absolute terms, the investment Partnerships, and Infrastructure. We governments, academia, and the private by other countries is growing faster. As a result, the U.S. share of global R&D spending conclude by offering a Roadmap for sector – to bring about the next era of decreased from 37% to 25% between 2000 and 2017. actions the NSB and the National Science American innovation leadership. Source: NSB, “Research and Development: U.S. Trends and International Comparisons,” Science & Engineering Indicators 2020 Foundation (NSF) will undertake to help United States East-Southeast and South Asia FUNDAMENTAL According to National Security Decision Directive (NSDD)-189, European Union RESEARCH fundamental research includes basic and applied research in science Rest of World and engineering, which the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Frascati Manual defines as follows:8 BASIC Experimental or theoretical work undertaken primarily to acquire RESEARCH new knowledge of the underlying foundations of phenomena and observable facts, without any particular application or use in view. 12% 13% 25% APPLIED Original investigation undertaken in order to acquire new knowledge, RESEARCH directed primarily towards a specific, practical aim or objective. 37%37% EXPERIMENTAL Systematic work, drawing on knowledge gained from research and DEVELOPMENT practical experience and producing additional knowledge, which is 20% directed to producing new products or processes or to improving 25%25% 2000 2017 existing products or processes. 42% 26% 10 VISION 2030 VISION 2030 11 PRIVATE ACADEMIA Businesses Trade Schools Associations Universities Entrepreneurs THE S&E Colleges Foundations K-12 Nonprofits ECOSYSTEM Philanthropies GOVERNMENT State Local Federal National Labs ELEMENTS OF LEADERSHIP 12 VISION 2030 VISION 2030 13 disciplines to explore problems that cross the S&E enterprise will be critical as the U.S. seeks boundaries of multiple fields, have the potential to model open, ethically conducted science and ELEMENT: to influence how disciplines are organized engineering and sustain a global community of PRACTICE OF SCIENCE and how funding agencies invest. The funding like-minded partners. choices that agencies make will be critical In a world where transnational collaboration AND ENGINEERING to motivating funding recipients to move in in S&E is becoming more critical, the U.S. new directions and evaluate and modify their must support researchers’ collaborations respective organizations and strategic priorities. For the U.S. to preserve its lead in that discoveries are translated into innovations. with scientists abroad. These collaborations fundamental research and empower its While the U.S.’s decentralized, bottom-up In the coming decade, the U.S. also must and the progress of knowledge itself depend businesses and enterprises to compete approach to S&E research produces new continue to improve the research environment, on preserving the open flow of knowledge. globally, it must stay on the leading edge knowledge in many disciplines, it can result setting the standard for research ethics and At the same time, it will be crucial that the of the practice of S&E. This entails being in that knowledge being siloed and less values. To do so, the U.S. must embrace U.S. safeguard sensitive areas of research more strategic about investments, making likely to make the leap from the research and champion core values of objectivity, in which national security considerations the S&E ecosystem more nimble, embracing environment to industry. Policies, incentives, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, must prevail. The nation’s guide in doing new research tools and modalities, and processes that improve collaboration and stewardship. Furthermore, as the U.S. so should be President Ronald Reagan’s fostering an inclusive and ethical S&E across disciplines, between government S&E looks to the future, attention to falsification, policy on technology transfer (NSDD-189), enterprise, welcoming and capitalizing on agencies, and among government, academia, plagiarism, and fabrication per se will not suffice which called for the products of fundamental the globalization of S&E, and retaining the and industry, can facilitate that translation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GERALDINE L. RICHMOND Website
    1 GERALDINE L. RICHMOND Website: http://RichmondScience.uoregon.edu Address: 1253 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 Phone: (541) 346-4635 Email: [email protected] Fax: (541) 346-5859 EDUCATION 1976—1980 Ph.D. Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, Advisor: George C. Pimentel 1971—1975 B.S. Chemistry, Kansas State University EMPLOYMENT 2013- Presidential Chair of Science and Professor of Chemistry, University of Oregon Research Interests: Understanding the molecular structure and dynamics of interfacial processes that have relevance to environmental remediation, biomolecular assembly, atmospheric chemistry and alternative energy sources. Teaching Interests: Science literacy for nonscientists; career development courses for emerging and career scientists and engineers in the US and developing countries. 2001-2013 Richard M. and Patricia H. Noyes Professor of Chemistry, University of Oregon 1998-2001 Knight Professor of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Oregon 1991- Professor of Chemistry, University of Oregon 1991-1995 Director, Chemical Physics Institute, University of Oregon 1985-l991 Associate Professor of Chemistry, University of Oregon 1980-1985 Assistant Professor of Chemistry, Bryn Mawr College AWARDS AND HONORS 2019 Linus Pauling Legacy Award, Oregon State University 2018 Linus Pauling Medal Award 2018 Priestley Medal, American Chemical Society (ACS) 2018 MHS Wall of Fame, Manhattan High School, Manhattan, Kansas 2018/19 Visiting Fellow, Chemical Institute of Technology, Mumbai, India 2017 Howard Vollum Award for Distinguished Achievement in Science and Technology, Reed College 2017 Honorary Doctorate Degree, Kansas State University 2017 Honorary Doctorate Degree, Illinois Institute of Technology 2016- Secretary, American Academy of Arts and Sciences; Member of the Board, Council and Trust 2015 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Census: Planning Ahead for 2020
    S. Hrg. 112–676 CENSUS: PLANNING AHEAD FOR 2020 HEARING BEFORE THE FEDERAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, GOVERNMENT INFORMATION, FEDERAL SERVICES, AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JULY 18, 2012 Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 76–063 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut, Chairman CARL LEVIN, Michigan SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii TOM COBURN, Oklahoma THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware SCOTT P. BROWN, Massachusetts MARK L. PRYOR, Arkansas JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JON TESTER, Montana RAND PAUL, Kentucky MARK BEGICH, Alaska JERRY MORAN, Kansas MICHAEL L. ALEXANDER, Staff Director NICHOLAS A. ROSSI, Minority Staff Director TRINA DRIESSNACK TYRER, Chief Clerk JOYCE WARD, Publications Clerk and GPO Detailee SUBCOMMITTEE ON FEDERAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, GOVERNMENT INFORMATION, FEDERAL SERVICES, AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware, Chairman CARL LEVIN, Michigan SCOTT P. BROWN, Massachusetts DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii TOM COBURN, Oklahoma MARK L. PRYOR, Arkansas JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin MARK BEGICH, Alaska ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JOHN KILVINGTON, Staff Director WILLIAM WRIGHT, Minority Staff Director DEIRDRE G.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Biographies June 29, 2021
    Summit on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Anti-Racism in 21st Century STEMM Organizations June 29-30, 2021 | Virtual Event Speaker Biographies June 29, 2021: The systemic and structural nature of racism and bias Welcoming Remarks John L. Anderson is president of the National Academy of Engineering since July 1, 2019. He was born in Wilmington, DE, and received his undergraduate degree from the University of Delaware in 1967 and PhD degree from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1971, both in chemical engineering. He was most recently Distinguished Professor of Chemical Engineering and president (2007–2015) of the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT). Before that he was provost and executive vice president at Case Western Reserve University (2004–2007), following 28 years at Carnegie Mellon University, including 8 years as dean of the College of Engineering and 11 years as head of the Chemical Engineering Department. He began his professional career as an assistant professor of chemical engineering at Cornell University (1971–1976). Dr. Anderson was elected to the NAE in 1992 for contributions to the understanding of colloidal hydro-dynamics and membrane transport phenomena and was elected an NAE councillor in 2015. His service also includes numerous National Academies activities, such as the Committee on Determining Basic Research Needs to Interrupt the Improvised Explosive Device Delivery Chain (chair); Committee on Review of Existing and Potential Standoff Explosives Detection Techniques (chair); Organizing Committee for the National Security and Homeland Defense Workshop (cochair); Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology (cochair); and Ford Foundation Minority Postdoctoral Review Panel on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • National Statistical Programs: Directions and Challenges
    National Statistical Programs: Directions and Challenges Brian Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Director, CNSTAT Washington, DC • August 9, 2018 The Committee on National Statistics • Established in 1972 as a standing unit of the National Academies on the recommendation of the President’s Commission on Federal Statistics to provide an independent, objective resource for evaluation and improvement of federal statistical methods and operations. • There are about 50 standing units like CNSTAT in the Academies. 2 What is the Committee on National Statistics? • CNSTAT’s mission is to improve the statistical methods and information on which public policy decisions are based. It also serves as a coordinating force in the highly decentralized U.S. federal statistical system. • Over its 46-year history, CNSTAT has produced over 270 consensus, interim, letter, and workshop reports. • Every October and May, CNSTAT holds a public seminar on a topic of broad interest to the federal statistical and research communities and has a substantive luncheon with heads of major statistical agencies. 3 Who Serves on CNSTAT? Robert Groves (chair), Math/Statistics Sarah Nusser, Survey Research Mary Ellen Bock, Math/Statistics Colm O’Muircheartaigh, Survey Research Anne C. Case, Health Economics Jerome Reiter, Applied Statistics Michael Chernew, Health Economics Roberto Rigobon, Economic Statistics, Janet Currie, Welfare Economics Big Data Don Dillman, Survey Research Judith Seltzer, Sociology Tom Mesenbourg, Sr. Federal Statistics Management 4 Note: all members serve pro
    [Show full text]
  • PAA Affairs 2011 Quarterly Newsletter of the Population Association of America, Inc
    Winter 43rd 2010– Year PAA Affairs 2011 Quarterly Newsletter of the Population Association of America, Inc. Kiersten Johnson, Editor PAA BUSINESS PAA Fall Board Meeting 2010 By Ann Biddlecom, Secretary-Treasurer New Initiatives Continuing under PAA Fund Campaign The PAA Board of Directors met on October 22 in Washington, D.C., with President Robert Mare presiding. Among the issues discussed were a set of new initiatives to support under the PAA Fund Campaign, results from the 2010 PAA membership survey, review and approval of the 2011 budget, and planning for the 2011 Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C. The PAA Fund Campaign raised more than $350,000 thus far from members to match $1 million from foundations (Hewlett, Gates, Rockefeller, MacArthur and Packard). Members of the new PAA Initiatives Committee (Marcia Carlson, Kyle Crowder (Chair), Kathleen Mullan Harris, Douglas Massey and Robert Schoeni) reviewed 20 propos- als submitted from standing PAA committees (e.g., International Outreach, Government and Public Affairs, Applied Demography) for activities to support from the PAA Campaign Fund. The Board approved 14 proposals totaling $345,610 for activities that include: • Data training workshop organized by the Committee on Population Statistics at the 2011 PAA Annual Meeting; • Population research briefings on Capitol Hill; • Bi-annual seminar series for analysts at the Congressional Budget Office or Government Accounting Office; • Support of a Science and Technology Fellowship (in partnership with the American Association for the
    [Show full text]
  • National Science Board: the Skilled Technical Workforce
    NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD THE SKILLED TECHNICAL WORKFORCE: Crafting America’s Science & Engineering Enterprise Why do the National Academies expect 3.4 million unfilled skilled 3.4M technical jobs by 2022? What did 139 stakeholders from across the country say the U.S. should do to 139 improve opportunities for skilled technical workers? What 4 recommendations do we offer for building the Skilled Technical 4 Workforce of the future? 2 THE SKILLED TECHNICAL WORKFORCE Cover Photo Credit: Darryl Estrine THE SKILLED TECHNICAL WORKFORCE 3 THE SKILLED TECHNICAL WORKFORCE: Crafting America’s Science & Engineering Enterprise September 2019 Report #: NSB-2019-23 4 THE SKILLED TECHNICAL WORKFORCE DIANE L. SOUVAINE ELLEN OCHOA NSB Chair NSB Vice Chair Professor of Computer Director (retired) Science and Adjunct Lyndon B. Johnson Space Professor of Mathematics Center Tufts University JOHN L. ANDERSON JAMES S. JACKSON G.P. “BUD” PETERSON President Daniel Katz Distinguished Professor National Academy of University Professor of Woodruff School of Engineering Psychology; Professor of Mechanical Engineering Afro-American and African Georgia Institute of ROGER N. BEACHY Studies; Research Professor, Technology Professor Emeritus of Research Center for Group Biology Dynamics, Institute for Social JULIA M. PHILLIPS Washington University, St. Research Executive Emeritus Louis University of Michigan Sandia National Laboratories ARTHUR BIENENSTOCK STEVEN LEATH DANIEL A. REED Professor Emeritus of President (retired) Senior Vice President for Iowa State University and Photon Science Academic Affairs (Provost) Stanford University Auburn University University of Utah VICKI L. CHANDLER W. CARL LINEBERGER GERALDINE L. Fellow of JILA and E. U. Dean of Faculty RICHMOND Minerva Schools at KGI Condon Distinguished Professor of Chemistry Presidential Chair in Science University of Colorado and Professor of Chemistry MAUREEN L.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Indicators, 1972. INSTITUTION National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 084 150 SE 016 807 TITLE Science Indicators, 1972. INSTITUTION National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. National Science Board. PU8 DATE 73 NOTE 146p. LYAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 20402 (Stock No. 3800-00146, $3.35, postpaid $3.00) EDRS PRICE MF -$O.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS *Annual Reports; Attitudes; *Data Collection; Research; Resources; *Sciences; Scientific Personnel; *Technology IDENTIFIERS *National Science Board; Research Reports ABSTRACT In this report the National Science Board presents the first results from a newly initiated effort to develop indicators of the state of the scientific enterprise in the Unite States. The ultimate goal of this effort is a set of indices which will reveal the strengths and weaknesses of U.S. science and technology, in terms of the capacity and performance of the enterprise in contributing to national objectives. Indicators in this report deal with facets of the entire scientific endeavor, as well as certain aspects of technology. They range from measures of basic research activity and industrial research and development, through indices of scientific and engineering personnel and institutional capabilities, to indicators of productivity and the U.S. balance of trade in high-technology products. In addition to graphically presenting the indicators, the report also provides results from opinion and attitude surveys of topics related to the state of science. The first of these is a Delphi survey of the judgments and opinions of a wide cross-section of the scientific and technological community, and the second surveys the attitudes of the public tovard science and technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan Director National Science Foundation
    Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan Director National Science Foundation The Honorable Sethuraman Panchanathan is a computer scientist and engineer and the 15th director of the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF). Panchanathan was nominated to this position by the President of the United States in 2019 and subsequently unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate on June 18, 2020. NSF is an $8.3B independent federal agency and the only government agency charged with advancing all fields of scientific discovery, technological innovation and STEM education. Panchanathan is a leader in science, engineering and education with more than three decades of experience. He has a distinguished career in both higher education and government, where he has designed and built knowledge enterprises, which advance research innovation, strategic partnerships, entrepreneurship, global development and economic growth. Panchanathan previously served as the executive vice president of the Arizona State University (ASU) Knowledge Enterprise, where he was also chief research and innovation officer. He was also the founder and director of the Center for Cognitive Ubiquitous Computing at ASU. Under his leadership, ASU increased research performance fivefold, earning recognition as the fastest growing and most innovative research university in the U.S. Prior to joining NSF, Panchanathan served on the National Science Board as chair of the Committee on Strategy and as a member of the External Engagement and National Science and Engineering Policy committees. Additionally, he served on the National Advisory Council on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. He was chair of the Council on Research of the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities and co-chair of the Extreme Innovation Taskforce of the Global Federation of Competitiveness Councils.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perils of Complacency
    THE PERILS OF COMPLACENCYTHE PERILS : America at a Tipping Point in Science & Engineering : America at a Tipping Point THE PERILS OF COMPLACENCY America at a Tipping Point in Science & Engineering An Update to Restoring the Foundation: The Vital Role of Research in Preserving the American Dream AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS & SCIENCES AMERICAN ACADEMY THE PERILS OF COMPLACENCY America at a Tipping Point in Science & Engineering An Update to Restoring the Foundation: The Vital Role of Research in Preserving the American Dream american academy of arts & sciences Cambridge, Massachusetts © 2020 by the American Academy of Arts & Sciences All rights reserved. isbn: 0- 87724- 134- 1 This publication is available online at www.amacad.org/publication/perils-of-complacency. The views expressed in this report are those held by the contributors and are not necessarily those of the Officers and Members of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Please direct inquiries to: American Academy of Arts and Sciences 136 Irving Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138- 1996 Telephone: 617- 576- 5000 Email: [email protected] Website: www.amacad.org Contents Acknowledgments 5 Committee on New Models for U.S. Science & Technology Policy 6 Preface 8 Executive Summary 11 Chapter 1 Introduction 35 1.1 Why Now? 38 Focus Section: Restoring the Foundation Five Years Later 45 Chapter 2 Science and Technology Matters 48 2.1 s&t Impacts: Where Science and Engineering Have Made a Difference 50 2.2 The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly 55 2.3 The Past Is Prologue: Future Challenges for Science and Technology 57 2.4 A Glimpse into the Future 61 Chapter 3 The State of the Union: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • World Champion Sustainability Alumna Christa Brelsford Wins Her Division at the IFSC Paraclimbing World Championship in Gijon, Spain
    World Champion Sustainability alumna Christa Brelsford wins her division at the IFSC Paraclimbing World Championship in Gijon, Spain Study Abroad | Thought Leaders | Institute Renamed | Class Notes Envision the future you want. Now make it happen. sustainability.asu.edu/degrees sustainability @ asu ASU Wrigley Institute Directorate Sustainability in Action Julie Wrigley Honored .................... 4 DIRECTOR Gary Dirks New Programs, Centers and Initiatives .......... 16 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & COO Rob Melnick Thought Leader Series ................... 18 DEAN Christopher Boone Partnerships for Solutions ................. 24 Sustainability Solutions Festival .............. 28 Events and Engagements ................. 30 School of Sustainability Alumni Chapter Leadership 2014-15 Sustainability in Practice .................. 32 PRESIDENT Haley Paul, MS 2010 PAST PRESIDENT Maren Mahoney, MA 2011 Greetings Dean, School of Sustainability ............... 8 PRESIDENT-ELECT Leah Stonefeld, BA 2012 Senior Director of Development .............. 9 TREASURER Tony Perez, BS 2013 SECRETARY Marina Acosta, BA 2012 Alumni and Students Residence Hall Renovation ................. 5 DIRECTORS-AT-LARGE Karen Kao, MSUS 2013 Kristen Efurd Osgood, BA 2011 Enrollment and Employment ................ 6 Lucky Sharma, MS 2012 Study Abroad ......................... 11 Cover Story - World Champion ............... 14 School of Sustainability Alumni Updates ....................... 40 Arizona State University PO Box 875502 Tempe, AZ 85287-5502 Faculty and Staff All correspondence,
    [Show full text]
  • NSF FY 2020 Budget Reques to Congress
    NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION FY 2020 Budget Request to Congress March 18, 2019 ii FY 2020 NSF Budget Request to Congress NOTES Numbers in the tables and figures may not add up to totals because of rounding. Amounts for FY 2019 were not available at the time this Budget Request was published. Common Acronyms Used in Budget Request to Congress Appropriation Accounts • AOAM - Agency Operations and Award Management • EHR - Education and Human Resources • MREFC - Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction • NSB - National Science Board • OIG - Office of Inspector General • R&RA - Research and Related Activities Directorates and offices • BFA - Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management • BIO - Directorate for Biological Sciences • CISE - Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering • ENG - Directorate for Engineering • EHR - Directorate for Education and Human Resources • GEO - Directorate for Geosciences • MPS - Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences • SBE - Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences • OIRM - Office of Information and Resource Management • OISE - Office of International Science and Engineering • OPP - Office of Polar Programs • OIA - Office of Integrative Activities [organizational unit] • IA - Integrative Activities [budget activity] NSF Big Ideas Convergence Accelerator • NSF C-Accel - NSF Convergence Accelerator Research Big Ideas • HDR - Harnessing the Data Revolution for 21st-Century Science and Engineering • FW-HTF - The Future of Work at the Human-Technology
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENCE and ENGINEERING INDICATORS 2020 Introduction
    NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD 2020 SCIENCE & ENGINEERING INDICATORS The State of U.S. Science & Engineering National Science Board Diane L. Souvaine, NSB Chair Victor R. McCrary Professor of Computer Science and Adjunct Professor Vice President for Research and Graduate Programs; of Mathematics Professor of Chemistry Tufts University University of the District of Columbia Ellen Ochoa, NSB Vice Chair Emilio F. Moran Director (retired) John A. Hannah Distinguished Professor of Global Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Change Science Michigan State University Sethuraman Panchanathan John L. Anderson Executive Vice President and Chief Research and Innovation President Officer of Knowledge Enterprise Development; Director of the National Academy of Engineering Center for Cognitive Ubiquitous Computing Arizona State University Roger N. Beachy Professor Emeritus of Biology G. P. “Bud” Peterson Washington University, St. Louis Professor, Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Arthur Bienenstock Professor Emeritus of Photon Science Julia M. Phillips Stanford University Executive Emeritus Sandia National Laboratories Vicki L. Chandler Dean of Faculty Daniel A. Reed Minerva Schools at KGI Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs (Provost) University of Utah Maureen L. Condic Associate Professor of Neurobiology and Anatomy Geraldine L. Richmond University of Utah, School of Medicine Presidential Chair in Science and Professor of Chemistry University of Oregon W. Kent Fuchs President Anneila I. Sargent University of Florida Ira S. Bowen Professor of Astronomy California Institute of Technology Suresh V. Garimella President S. Alan Stern University of Vermont Associate Vice President and Special Assistant to the President Robert M. Groves Southwest Research Institute Provost and Executive Vice President; Gerard J. Campbell, S.J.
    [Show full text]