DOCSLIB.ORG

RAPID CITY Pedestrian Tips

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RAPID CITY Pedestrian Tips South Dakota Codified Law 2-28-9.1 Pedestrian control signals--Violation by driver as misdemeanor--Violation by pedestrian as petty 32-27-2 Yielding right-of-way to pedestrians offense. Whenever special pedestrian control signals at controlled intersections--Circumstances under exhibiting the words, walk or don’t walk, or exhibiting which pedestrians must yield--Violation as petty a lighted international pedestrian walk or don’t walk RAPID CITY offense. At intersections where traffic is controlled symbol are in place the signals indicate the following: Police Department by traffic control signals or police officers, drivers of vehicles, including those making turns, shall (1) Walk or a lighted international pedestrian walk yield the right-of-way to pedestrians crossing symbol--Pedestrians facing the signal may proceed or those who have started to cross the roadway across the roadway in the direction of the signal and on a green or go signal, and in all other cases shall be given the right-of-way by the drivers of all Pedestrian Safety pedestrians shall yield the right-of-way to vehicles vehicles; lawfully proceeding directly ahead on a green or go signal. A violation of this section by a driver (2) Don’t walk or a lighted international pedestrian is a petty offense. A violation of this section by a don’t walk symbol--No pedestrian may start to cross pedestrian is a petty offense. the roadway in the direction of the signal, but any pedestrian who has partially completed crossing on the 32-27-3 Local ordinances regulating crossing at walk signal shall proceed to a sidewalk or safety island controlled intersections. Local authorities in their while the don’t walk signal or lighted international respective jurisdictions may by ordinance require pedestrian don’t walk symbol is showing. that at intersections where traffic is controlled by traffic control signals or by police officers, A violation of this section by a driver is a Class 2 pedestrians shall not cross a roadway against a red misdemeanor. A violation of this section by a pedestrian or stop signal, and between adjacent intersections is a petty offense. so controlled shall not cross at any place except in a marked or unmarked crosswalk. Link to City Ordinances 32-27-4 Jaywalking--Duty to yield right-of-way http://www.amlegal.com/library/sd/rapidcity.shtml to vehicles--Violation as petty offense. Every Link to South Dakota Codified Laws pedestrian crossing a highway within a business http://legis.state.sd.us/statutes/index.aspx or residence district at any point other than a pedestrian crossing, crosswalk, or intersection These links can also be found on the Rapid City Police shall yield the right-of-way to vehicles upon the Department’s web site. www.rcgov.org/police under the highway. A violation of this section is a petty Services tab. offense. 32-27-5 Highways without sidewalks--Duty to walk facing traffic--Violation as petty offense. For further information contact: Where sidewalks are not provided any pedestrian walking along or upon a highway shall, when Rapid City Police Department practicable, walk only on the left side of the roadway or its shoulder facing traffic which may Traffic Section approach from the opposite direction. A violation (605) 394-4130 of this section is a petty offense. Pedestrian Tips Rapid City is a pedestrian friendly community with Safety Tips for Pedestrians • Stop and look around cars, shrubs and any other miles of beautiful bike paths. However, the objects that prevent drivers and pedestrians from frequency of pedestrian/motor vehicle collisions On a per mile basis, walking is more dangerous than driving, seeing each other. has increased significantly over the last year. In flying, or riding a bus or train. • Be alert for vehicles in parking lots. Rapid City from 2004 through 2007, there were 15 to • Talking on a cell phone while crossing a street can 17 pedestrian/motor vehicle accidents per year. In Know your Pedestrian Traffic Signals be distracting - Always Pay Attention. 2008, pedestrian/motor vehicle accidents rose to • Walk Signal - start crossing and watch for turning vehicles. 29. Of those 29 pedestrian/motor vehicle accidents, • Flashing Don’t Walk Signal - finish crossing if started. Watch your Children two resulted in fatalities. For early 2009, the frequency • Steady Don’t Walk Signal - DON’T CROSS. • Children are unpredictable. of pedestrian/motor vehicle accidents was high as • Pedestrians must obey signals - IT’S THE LAW • Children should not cross streets by themselves. well. Sometimes, the accidents were the pedestrian’s (SDCL 32-27-2). • Hold a child’s hand while crossing a street. fault; sometimes, the accidents were the motor vehicle • Children should not play or walk near traffic. driver’s fault. Many times, fault was shared by both Look Left, Right and Left for Traffic • Children cannot judge vehicle distances and speeds. the pedestrian and the driver of the motor vehicle. • Stop at curb and look left, right and then left again. • Stopping at the curb signals drivers you intend to cross. When Children get Older, Teach Them When it comes to pedestrian safety, “It’s a two-way • Stay in crosswalk. Three Things street.” Pedestrians have a responsibility to cross streets • Walk, don’t run across the street. • Try to cross at a corner with a traffic light. at safe locations and with caution. Drivers of motor • Obey signal - look first before stepping into the street. • Stop at the curb. vehicles have a responsibility to yield to pedestrians at • Wait for a fresh green light to get the maximum time to • Look Left, Right, and Left again to make sure no intersections, crosswalks, and in school zones. Rapid cross the street. cars are coming. City Ordinances and South Dakota State Laws apply to • Continue crossing to the other side if the DON’T both the motor vehicle driver and to the pedestrian, thus, WALK signal starts to flash after entering the street. drivers and pedestrians can both be criminally charged. Rapid City Ordinance (RCO) Walk on the Sidewalk Pedestrian/motor vehicle statistics from a 2007 • Stay on sidewalk and crosswalks. 0.36.010 Right-of-way. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration • Avoid walking where there are no sidewalks or crosswalks. A. The operator of any vehicle shall yield the right- (NHTSA) report • If no sidewalk, walk facing traffic. of-way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within any marked crosswalk or within any unmarked crosswalk • On average, a pedestrian was killed in a traffic crash every Cross at Intersections at the end of a block or entrance to an alley, except 113 minutes, and injured in a traffic crash every 8 minutes. • Most people are hit by cars when they cross at places other at intersections where the movement of traffic is being • 70,000 pedestrians were injured in traffic crashes. than intersections. regulated by police officers or traffic control signals. • 4,654 pedestrians were killed in traffic crashes. • Drivers typically watch more carefully for pedestrians at Whenever any vehicle has stopped at a crosswalk or • 73% of the pedestrian fatalities occurred in urban areas. intersections. intersection to permit a pedestrian to cross a roadway, • 77% of the pedestrian fatalities occurred at non-intersection • If crossing other than at a crosswalk or intersection the operator of any other vehicle approaching from the locations. (jaywalking), YIELD to vehicles - IT’S THE LAW rear shall not overtake and pass the stopped vehicle. • 90% of the pedestrian fatalities occurred in normal weather (SDCL 32-27-4 & RCO 10.36.010 C). conditions. B. At intersections where traffic is controlled by • 67% of the pedestrian fatalities occurred at night. See and Be Seen traffic control signals or police officers, drivers of • 70% of the pedestrian fatalities were males. Pedestrians age • Make eye contact with drivers - drivers need to see you to vehicles, including those making turns, shall yield the 70+ accounted for 16% of all pedestrian fatalities. avoid you. right-of-way to pedestrians crossing or those who have • 20% of all children between age 5 and 9, killed in traffic • While crossing - keep looking, especially on wide, started to cross the roadway on a walk signal; and, in all crashes, were pedestrians. other cases, pedestrians shall yield the right-of-way to • 36% of all young (under age 16) pedestrian fatalities busy streets. • Wear bright colors or reflective materials. vehicles lawfully proceeding directly ahead or turning occurred between 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. on a green or go signal. • 48% of the pedestrian fatalities occurred on Friday, • Carry a flashlight when walking in the dark. • Watch for turning vehicles. Saturday and Sunday. C. Every pedestrian crossing a highway at any • Alcohol involvement - by either the driver or the pedestrian • Treat driveways and alleys like roadways. point other than a pedestrian crossing, a crosswalk or - was reported in 49% of the traffic crashes that resulted in • Watch for backing vehicles. intersection shall yield the right-of-way to vehicles pedestrian fatalities. upon the highway..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Judicial Corruption"
    16/06/2017 Gmail - "JUDICIAL CORRUPTION" William Finnerty <[email protected]> "JUDICIAL CORRUPTION" William Finnerty <[email protected]> Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:10 PM To: "First Minister of Northern Ireland Arlene Foster LL.B. MLA" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Northern Ireland Justice Department, Case Ref: COR/1248/2016" <private.office@justice- ni.x.gsi.gov.uk>, Northern Ireland Justice Minister Claire Sugden MLA <[email protected]>, Northern Ireland Minister For Finance Máirtín Ó Muilleoir MLA <[email protected]>, Northern Ireland Minister for Health Michelle O'Neill MLA <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Lawyer Paul J. O'Kane LL.B." <[email protected]>, "Lawyer Aoife McShane LL.B." <[email protected]>, Lawyer Rory McShane <[email protected]>, Lawyer Mary Doherty <[email protected]>, "Lawyer Ronan McGuigan, LL.B. Solicitor Advocate" <[email protected]>, "Lawyer Jacqueline Malone LL.B. Solicitor Advocate" <[email protected]>, "Lawyer Louise Moley LL.B." <[email protected]>, "Lawyer Ann Marie Featherstone LL.B. LL.M." <[email protected]>, Sheila McGuigan <[email protected]>, McGuigan Malone Solicitors <[email protected]>, "Lawyer Ronan Haughey of ML White Solicitors Ltd, Newry, Northern Ireland" <[email protected]>, "John Mackell, Director of Client (Solicitor)
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian Safety on Rural Highways
    FHWA-SA-04-008 September 2004 Technical Report Pedestrian Safety on Rural Highways Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-SA-04-008 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date (Update) Pedestrian Safety on Rural Highways September 2004 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Written By 8. Performing Organization Report No. J. W. Hall, J. D. Brogan, and M. Kondreddi 9. Performing Organization Name and Address (Update Report) 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Department of Civil Engineering, MSC01 1070 University of New Mexico 11. Contract or Grant No. Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety 400 Seventh Street SW Washington, DC 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes AOTR: D. Smith (HSA-30); T. Redmon (HSA-20); 16. Abstract Although pedestrian fatalities have decreased by 16 percent over the past decade, the United States experienced nearly 4,749 pedestrian fatalities in 2003. The conventional wisdom has been that this is primarily an urban problem, where pedestrians are subject to numerous conflicts with vehicular traffic. The fact that 28 percent of pedestrian fatalities occur in rural areas has largely been ignored, despite the fact that pedestrian impacts in rural areas, while relatively rare, are much more likely to result in fatalities or serious injuries. The research described in this paper sought to identify the characteristics of rural pedestrian fatalities in ten states with above-average rates of rural pedestrian fatalities. The most prominent characteristics of rural pedestrian fatalities in these states were clear weather, hours of darkness, weekends, non- intersection locations, and level, straight roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Safety Act of 1973
    * * PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY STUDY Highway Safety Act of 1973 * (Section 214) Of T t ^. STATES Of a^ * MARCH 1975 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY * ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 * PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY STUDY Highway Safety Act of 1973 (Section 214) MARCH 1975 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 CONTENTS Page SECTION I: SYNOPSIS A. Introduction .............................................. 1 B. Executive Summary ......................................... 2 C. Background .............................................. 4 D. Study Methodology ......................................... 7 E. Congressional Recommendations ................................ 12 SECTION II: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY Introduction .............................................. 13 A. Review and Evaluation of State and Local Ordinances, Regulations, and Laws Pertaining to Pedestrian Safety .................................. 14 B. Review and Evaluation of Enforcement Policies, Procedures, Methods, Practices and Capabilities for Enforcing Pedestrian Rules ................ 35 C. Relationship Between Alcohol and Pedestrian Safety ................... 36 D. Evaluation of Ways and Means of Improving Pedestrian Safety Programs ...... 43 E. Analysis of Present Funding Allocation of Pedestrian Safety Programs and an Assessment of the Capabilities of Federal, State and Local Governments to Fund Such Activities and Programs .................... 45 F. Findings ................................................59
    [Show full text]
  • Student Economic Review 2015
    STUDENT ECONOMIC REVIEW 2015 UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN TRINITY COLLEGE PRESIDENT Professor John o’h agan DePartment of economics , t rinity college Dublin PATRONS Professor PhiliP lane heaD of DePartment of economics , t rinity college Dublin Drtara mitchell DePartment of economics , t rinity college Dublin Dr ronan lyons DePartment of economics , t rinity college Dublin Dr michael Wycherley DePartment of economics , t rinity college Dublin i THE STUDENT ECONOMIC REVIEW VOL . XXIX Published by the student economic review, c/o Department of economics, trinity college, Dublin 2 republic of ireland. all rights reserved. copyright © contributors to the student economic review 2015 all views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors or sponsors. this journal claims no special rights or privileges. all correspondence or complaints should be addressed to: the editor, student economic review, c/o Department of economics, trinity college, Dublin 2, republic of ireland. Printed by brunswick Press ltd. the ser logo was created by Paul Kenny in 2003. Photography by andrew murphy, aisling crabbe and gearóid gibbs cover by séamus o’beirne the student economic review is also available online at http://www.tcd.ie/economics/ser ii SPONSORS THE STUDENT ECONOMIC REVIEW WOULD LIKE TO SINCERELY THANK ALL OF OUR SPONSORS FOR THEIR CONTINUED SUPPORT MAIN SPONSORS mr harry hartforD mrVinay nair SPONSORS mr alan gray borD na móna ms aoife cunningham iii THE STUDENT ECONOMIC REVIEW VOL . XXIX THE STUDENT ECONOMIC
    [Show full text]
  • A NOVEL APPROACH for DIAGNOSING ROAD SAFETY ISSUES USING AUTOMATED COMPUTER VISION TECHNIQUES Tarek Sayed, Ph.D., P.Eng
    16th Road Safety on Four Continents Conference Beijing, China 15-17 May 2013 A NOVEL APPROACH FOR DIAGNOSING ROAD SAFETY ISSUES USING AUTOMATED COMPUTER VISION TECHNIQUES Tarek Sayed, Ph.D., P.Eng. Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia 6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 E-mail: [email protected] Mohamed H. Zaki, Ph.D. Post-Doctoral Fellow, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia 6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 E-mail: [email protected] Jarvis Autey, MSc. Research Assistant, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, 6250 Applied Science Lane, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The use of traffic conflicts for safety diagnosis has been gaining acceptance as a surrogate for collision data analysis. The traffic conflicts approach provided better understanding of collision contributing factors and the failure mechanism that leads to road collisions. This paper demonstrates an automated proactive safety diagnosis approach for vehicles, pedestrian and cyclists using video-based computer vision techniques. Traffic conflicts are automatically detected and several conflict indicators such as Time to collision (TTC) are calculated based on the analysis of the road-user positions in space and time. Additionally, spatial violations are detected based on the non-conformance of road users to travel regulations. Several case studies are described. The first case study deals of the safety analysis of a newly installed bike lane at the southern approach of a heavy volume Bridge in Vancouver, British Columbia. The results showed a high exposure of cyclists to traffic conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Policies for Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Mobility
    International Technology Scanning Program September 2010 REVIEW Public Policies for Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Mobility An Implementation Project of the Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Mobility International Scan SPONSORED BY: IN COOPERATION WITH: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials National Cooperative Highway Research Program Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................1 Findings .............................................................................1 Conclusions ..........................................................................2 Introduction .............................................................................. 3 Purpose of Report .....................................................................3 Scope of Report .......................................................................3 Organization ..........................................................................3 Findings .................................................................................. 4 Methodology .........................................................................4 Listing and Brief Description of Policies .....................................................4 Conclusions .............................................................................. 7 Appendix A | Complete Streets Policies ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal Pedestrian Crossing at a Traffic Light: a Study on Tourist Behaviour
    Pratelli et al., Int. J. Transp. Dev. Integr., Vol. 1, No. 4 (2017) 633–639 ILLEGAL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT A TRAFFIC LIGHT: A STUDY ON toURIST BEHAVIOUR A. PRATELLI, M. LUPI & D. RAZZUOLI DICI – Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, Italy. ABSTRACT Illegal pedestrian crossing situations at signalized intersections are observed worldwide. The main goal of this study was to observe attributes and determine the proportion and type of pedestrian violations and dangerous crossing situations at a traffic light located in a recreational tourist urban environment, i.e. the beach town of Viareggio on the coast of Tuscany, Italy. A large signalized intersection placed close to the beach was observed for some days in Summer 2015, for several hours, both in the morning and in the afternoon, to collect data. The main aim was to identify the illegal pedestrian crossing behaviour with red traffic light. Pedestrian crossing data were recorded with a video camera. Then, the video data were processed us- ing a semi-automated software self-written in MATLAB to extract information on different pedestrian factors. Some factors, identified in the current literature as having an influence on the proportion of viola- tions, such as age, sex and group size, were analysed. Furthermore, the impact of the amber length time on the proportion of dangerous performed crossings was studied. The obtained results highlight that pedestrians in a recreational tourist environment are generally more in compliance with traffic light than those in a weekday urban context. It is also important to pay particular attention to pedestrian yellow time (amber steady man) in order to avoid dangerous legal crossings.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Reports Letters to the Editor
    Injury Prevention 1998;4:161–163 161 otherwise, from others, especially from parts The green papers are especially noteworthy Inj Prev: first published as 10.1136/ip.4.2.162 on 1 June 1998. Downloaded from of the world where we do not have Editorial in that the New Labour administration REGIONAL Board members. Please send your contribu- explicitly recognises the strong association tions to the editor, Barry Pless. between poverty and poor health and the REPORTS need to tackle the former (as well as lifestyle and behaviour) in the context of a compre- Pedestrian and bicyclist safety in New hensive health promotion strategy. York City For England, 12 year targets will be set to Southern Africa (and beyond) report reduce mortality and morbidity in four prior- Pedestrian and bicyclist safety in New York ity areas: heart disease and stroke, accidents, I am constantly aware that most of my reports City (NYC) has been in the news lately. Mayor cancer, and mental health (suicide). Targets selfishly concentrate on happenings in South- Rudolph Giuliani has raised the ire of NYC do not feature prominently (although they are ern Africa. Occasionally, I am able to glean residents by increasing the fine for jaywalking not ruled out) in the Scottish paper which, in the odd item on what is happening further from $2 to $50, plus making a court appear- addition to the above four areas, flags up a north from news reports, what little there is ance mandatory for paying fines for this number of others, particularly teenage preg- on the internet, or from that outstanding oVence.
    [Show full text]
  • Unusual Punishments” in Anglo- American Law: the Ed Ath Penalty As Arbitrary, Discriminatory, and Cruel and Unusual John D
    Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 13 | Issue 4 Article 2 Spring 2018 The onceptC of “Unusual Punishments” in Anglo- American Law: The eD ath Penalty as Arbitrary, Discriminatory, and Cruel and Unusual John D. Bessler Recommended Citation John D. Bessler, The Concept of “Unusual Punishments” in Anglo-American Law: The Death Penalty as Arbitrary, Discriminatory, and Cruel and Unusual, 13 Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol'y. 307 (2018). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol13/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized editor of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2018 by Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law `Vol. 13, Issue 4 (2018) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy The Concept of “Unusual Punishments” in Anglo-American Law: The Death Penalty as Arbitrary, Discriminatory, and Cruel and Unusual John D. Bessler* ABSTRACT The Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, like the English Bill of Rights before it, safeguards against the infliction of “cruel and unusual punishments.” To better understand the meaning of that provision, this Article explores the concept of “unusual punishments” and its opposite, “usual punishments.” In particular, this Article traces the use of the “usual” and “unusual” punishments terminology in Anglo-American sources to shed new light on the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause. The Article surveys historical references to “usual” and “unusual” punishments in early English and American texts, then analyzes the development of American constitutional law as it relates to the dividing line between “usual” and “unusual” punishments.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian Accommodations at Intersections
    FHWA COURSE ON BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION L E S S O N 1 5 Pedestrian Accommodations at Intersections 15.1 Purpose Walkways provide mobility along a linear path. But dash,” where a pedestrian enters the street at an eventually, people need to cross roads and streets at intersection and is seen too late by a driver of a intersections. These intersections, where the paths motor vehicle is the third most prevalent pedestrian of people and vehicles come together, can be the accident type, accounting for 7.2 percent of all most challenging part of negotiating a pedestrian pedestrian crashes. network. If pedestrians cannot cross the street safely, then mobility is severely limited, access is The solution is to design and build intersections denied, and walking as a mode of travel is discour- that: aged. • Encourage pedestrian use in lieu of mid- This lesson provides an overview of several design block crossing locations. features that are critical in order to provide for • Make pedestrians as visible as possible. pedestrian access at intersections. Much research • Make pedestrian actions as predictable has been done on this topic in the past, and several design manuals provide more detail, including the as possible. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control • Slow vehicular traffic. Devices, AASHTO’s Policy on the Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, and ITE’s Design and Safety of Pedestrian Facilities among others. Text for this lesson was taken from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ 1998 publication, entitled Design and Safety of Pedestrian Facilities–A Recommended Practice. Reprinted with permission. 15.2 Introduction In urban areas, two-thirds of the pedestrian injuries occur at central business district (CBD) intersec- Reduced sight distances can present a serious problem for pedestrians who wish to tions.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Nymtcregion
    New York Metropolitan Transportation Council Pedestrian Safety in the NYMTC Region Prepared by CUNY Institute for Transportation Systems September 2007 NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Study Final Report Prepared by Claire E. McKnight Kyriacos Mouskos Camille Kamga Institute for Transportation Systems City University of New York Region 2, University Transportation Research Center And Chris Hardej Aizaz Ahmed Safety Advisory Work Group Advisors New York Metropolitan Transportation Council Prepared for New York Metropolitan Transportation Council July 2007 Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of those interviewed as interpreted by the authors except where specified. The authors are responsible for the facts, data, and analyses presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, nor the collective membership of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Acceptance of this report as evidence of fulfillment, in part or whole, of the objectives of the planning study PTCS06T00.01 and PTCS05T00.01 does not constitute endorsement or approval of the need for any recommended improvement or additional study. It is being sponsored by the NYMTC for the benefit of its members and all interested stakeholders. Other legislation, regulation, executive order(s), official policy, and/or standard practice may supersede the recommendations or advice provided within. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Pedestrian Safety in the NYMTC Region July 9, 2007 6. Performing Organization Code 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Safety in the Context of Urban Development in Sweden and California
    Road Safety in the Context of Urban Development in Sweden and California by Carolyn Ann McAndrews A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning and the Designated Emphasis in Global Metropolitan Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Elizabeth Deakin Professor Karen Christensen Professor Mark Hansen Professor Gene Rochlin Spring 2010 © Copyright by Carolyn Ann McAndrews All Rights Reserved Abstract Road Safety in the Context of Urban Development in Sweden and California by Carolyn Ann McAndrews Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Professor Elizabeth Deakin, Chair Road safety is a serious public health issue throughout the world, with more than one million people killed in traffic accidents each year. Despite the severity of its health impacts, the World Health Organization says that traffic safety is a "neglected" topic. Perhaps this is the case in the US, where traffic accidents are the leading cause of death for people up to age 34, and where the traffic safety record is one of the worst among high-income countries. Other high- income countries such as Sweden have much better road safety performance. Differences in road safety between countries could be explained by the quality of infrastructure, driving conditions, the culture of driving, or the power of enforcement. Each of these elements is shaped by institutional contexts such as design, planning, and policy-making processes. Moreover, research about other technical systems has shown the powerful effect of organization, norms, and communication on safety.
    [Show full text]