The Gospel of Thomas a Fusion of Horizons by Jody L. Wood a Thesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Gospel of Thomas a Fusion of Horizons by Jody L. Wood a Thesis The Gospel of Thomas A Fusion of Horizons By Jody L. Wood A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Arts in Theology and Religious Studies. February, 2018, Halifax, Nova Scotia © Jody L. Wood Examining committee Approved: Dr. Magi Abdul-Masih Supervisor Approved: Dr. Syed Adnan Hussain Examiner Approved: The Reverend Dr. David MacLachlan External Examiner February 28, 2018 Abstract The Gospel of Thomas A Fusion of Horizons By Jody L. Wood February 28, 2018 The ancient texts found at Nag Hammadi have been studied by the leading scholars in the field of textual analysis. Included in Nag Hammadi was The Gospel of Thomas, which has also undergone significant critical and historical analysis. Research focussing on how the text was meaningful within wider social structures and Christian communities is seemingly sparse. Therefore, I propose this study to undertake a hermeneutical analysis of The Gospel of Thomas for meaning by first constructing an analysis of a horizon of the ancient communities in which the text may have been read and a modern horizon. Using Hans-Georg Gadamer’s notion of the fusion of horizons, this study will ultimately fuse the horizons to find meaning. 2 Acknowledgement I would like to offer my heartfelt thanks my thesis supervisor, Dr. Magi Abdul- Masih, for sharing her wisdom and mentorship. The resulting thesis is a product of her persevering patience and enlightening discussions which has benefited me and this thesis, probably more than she will ever know. Thank you to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research for consideration in my receiving the Faculty of Graduate Studies & Research Fellowship and Award. This funding was a blessing. I would like to thank Dr. Syed Adnan Hussain and The Reverend Dr. David MacLachlan for their time, attention, and learned experience towards the successful defense of this thesis. I would also like thank Dr. Mary Hale, Graduate Coordinator, Department of Religious Studies, for her time and efforts keeping me on track through the program. And I would also like to thank Dr. Pamela Yates for her assistance in the writing process and your encouragement and friendship throughout. Finally, I could not have accomplished this project without the love, support, and encouragement of my husband. Thank you, John. I love you. 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………6 a. Chapter One – Method............................................................................. 7 b. Chapter Two – Horizon of the Back of the Text…………………………….9 c. Chapter Three – The Text ………………………………………….…….10 d. Chapter Four – Horizon of the Front of the Text…………………………...12 e. Chapter Five – A Fusion of Horizons ……………………………………….14 2. Chapter One – Method………………………………………………………………...15 a. The Problem of Knowledge………………………………...………………...15 b. Hans - Georg Gadamer………………………………………………….……18 c. What is Horizon? ……………………………………………………………...22 d. Language……………………………………………………………………….25 3. Chapter Two - The Back of the Text – Gnostic Christian Communities in the years 100 to 150 CE ……………………………………………………………...……28 a. The Roman Empire……………………………………………………………30 i. Social Hierarchy of the Roman Empire…………………………….30 b. The Christian Community in Rome………………………………………….34 i. Early Christianity as Social Movement……………………………..34 ii. Persecution and Martyrdom…………………………………………37 iii. Diversity within the Community……………………………………..43 c. Christian Gnostic Community……………………………………………..…44 i. What is Gnosis?............................................................................45 ii. Gnostics and Christian Gnostics…………………………………....47 iii. Social Context of the Christian Gnostic Community…………..….50 1. Marcionites …………………………………………………..53 2. Valentinus and the Valentinian Community………………58 4. Chapter Three - The Text – The Gospel of Thomas……………………………….67 a. The History of the Text………………………………………………………..67 i. The Fragment Discovery…………………………………………….68 ii. The Nag Hammadi Discovery……………………………………….68 b. The Gospel of Thomas Research……………………………………………72 i. What kind of text is The Gospel of Thomas?................................73 ii. Is The Gospel of Thomas related to the Lost Gospel Q?..............75 iii. What is a Gnostic text?.................................................................79 c. Gnosticism within the Nag Hammadi library…………………………….….81 d. Is The Gospel of Thomas a gnostic gospel?............................................83 5. Chapter Four – The Front of the Text – Modern Voices…………………………...87 a. Canada………………………………………………………………………....87 b. The Structure of Modern Society………………………………………….…90 i. Individualism…………………………………………………………..90 ii. Commodification………………………………………………………95 iii. Fear…………………………………………………………………….98 c. Contemporary Christian Community……………………………………….100 i. Christian Community in an Individual Society……………………100 d. The Commodification of Spiritual Capital …………………………………102 e. Spiritual Capital in Popular Culture………………………………………...104 i. Stigmata……………………………………………………………...106 ii. The Celestine Prophecy……………………………………………109 iii. The Da Vinci Code………………………………………………….111 6. Chapter Five – A Fusion of Horizons - Finding Meaning…………………………115 a. The Valentinian Cosmology…………………………………………...……117 b. The Language of Metaphor…………………………………………………121 i. Feed The Birds……………………………………………………...122 c. Fusion of Horizons…………………………………………………………..127 i. Logion 2……………………………………………………………...127 ii. Logion 3………………………………………………………………131 iii. Logion 5……………………………………………………………...135 7. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….141 8. Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………...145 5 Introduction Jesus said, “Now the sower went out, took a handful (of seeds), and scattered them. Some fell on the road; the birds came and gathered them up. Others fell on rock, did not take root in the soil, and did not produce ears. And others fell on thorns; they choked the seed(s) and worms ate them. And others fell on the good soil and it produced good fruit: it bore sixty per measure and a hundred and twenty per measure”.1 In an old bookshop, the kind where hardbound books sit in piles on the floor and dust hangs thick in the air, I came across Marvin Meyer’s essays on The Gospel of Mary and the findings in the Nag Hammadi library. Amongst the pages was a historical critique on the recent speculation of an ancient intimate relationship between Mary Magdalene and Jesus of Nazareth. I was interested in the historical potential of what may have been a great romance2 so I bought the little book and squirrelled it away home. Meyer argues that Mary illuminates Mary Magdalene from the shadows of early Christian traditions and speculates that she was Jesus intimate companion. Nestled deep into the book was a section on the The Gospel of Thomas. The real intrigue, I thought, was found in Thomas and the ‘hidden’ sayings. Hidden sayings? Secret relationships? What exactly was going on in this ancient culture? Meyers’ introduction to Thomas was brief, but it did provide a translation of the 114 sayings, many starting with ‘Jesus said’. I read each saying and understood none. That is the beauty of Thomas. There is no narrative, nor are there any parables or lessons and very few characters. That said, it does open with one of the greatest literary 1 The Gospel of Thomas. Logion 9. as found in Bart D. Ehrman, Lost Scriptures. Books that Did Not Make it into the New Testament (New York: Oxford University Press. 2003), 21. 2 This is in reference to what I will discuss further in Chapter Four in the section about The Da Vinci Code. One of the plot lines in Brown’s novel concerned speculation that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were bound in a relationship that produced a child. I would argue that the impact of this plot line on readers and subsequent success of the novel is due in part to a welcome reimagining of Mary Magdalene. Brown has cast Mary Magdalene outside of the typical patriarchal roles for women, as either ‘mother’ or ‘prostitute’, by imagining her in the position of independent woman and intimate companion to Jesus. One who experienced a great romance. See Marvin Meyer, The Gospels of Mary, The Secret Traditions of Mary Magdalene. The Companion of Jesus (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 2004), vii-xxi. 6 hooks of all time…. “these are the secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke, and which Didymus Judas Thomas wrote down.”3 I wanted to know what the secret sayings meant. I wanted to understand these 114 logia and what they could mean to my own spiritual journey. Thomas, I initially thought, should be read like a puzzle. The sayings should fit together in a meaningful way. I reveled in the mystery. I imagined an interpretation from a different perspective than what is offered by Christian church tradition. Why? Thomas seemingly belongs to the Christian tradition yet does not play an active role in modern church traditions. Therefore, my initial scope for this project is to uncover the meaning of the sayings and invite a new relationship with the Christian tradition; however, the sayings in Thomas do not fit together into a concise narrative rather seemingly stand alone. Ancient Christian texts were written for a reason. The puzzle therefore, is to seek the meaning of each sayings by understanding why the text was written. What purpose was served by collecting these sayings into a text. What did the text provide for the ancient Christian communities into which it was read and what meaning may I discern into my own community?
Recommended publications
  • The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff About ANF01
    ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff About ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff Title: ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.html Author(s): Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Description: The Ante-Nicene Christian library is meant to comprise translations into English of all the extant works of the Fathers down to the date of the first General Council held at Nice in A.D. 325. The sole provisional exception is that of the more bulky writings of Origen. It is intended at present only to embrace in the scheme the Contra Celsum and the De Principiis of that voluminous author; but the whole of his works will be included should the undertaking prove successful. Publication History: Text edited by Rev. Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson and first published in Edinburgh, 1867. Additional introductionary material and notes provided for the American edition by A. Cleveland Coxe 1886. Print Basis: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, reprint 2001 Source: Logos Research Systems, Inc. Rights: Public Domain Date Created: 2002-10 Status: Proof reading, ThML markup and subject index for Version 3.0 by Timothy Lanfear General Comments: Hebrew and Greek were checked against page scans of the 1995 Hendrickson reprint by SLK; errors in the hard copy have not been corrected in this digitized text. Contributor(s): Timothy Lanfear (Markup) CCEL Subjects: All; Early Church; Classic; Proofed; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Da Vinci Code Phenomenon: a Brief Overview and Response
    THE DA VINCI CODE PHENOMENON: A BRIEF OVERVIEW AND RESPONSE J.B. HIXSON Assistant Academic Dean College of Biblical Studies Houston, Texas I. INTRODUCTION Dan Brown’s book, The Da Vinci Code,1 gives a fictional account of a Harvard researcher named Robert Langdon. In the story, Langdon is called upon to analyze Leonardo Da Vinci’s work and decode its hidden mysteries. What he uncovers is an elaborate scheme of secret societies, religious conspiracies, and centuries old cover ups. His investigation does not sit well with the religious establishment and he quickly becomes a marked man. So goes the plot of this entertaining and influential novel. Dan Brown’s novel has generated no shortage of analysis. To date, the Code has been cracked, broken, solved, decoded, exposed, scruti- nized, dismantled and otherwise deftly refuted in at least thirteen pub- lished books and hundreds more electronic articles on various websites.2 1 Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code: A Novel (New York: Doubleday, 2003). 2 See Richard Abanes, The Truth Behind the Da Vinci Code (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 2004); Darrell L. Bock, Breaking the Da Vinci Code: Answers to the Questions Everybody's Asking (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2004); Secrets of the Code: The Unauthorized Guide to the Mysteries Behind The Da Vinci Code, ed. Dan Burstein (New York: CDS Books, 2004); Simon Cox, Cracking the Da Vinci Code (New Dehli: Sterling Publishing, 2004); James L. Garlow and Peter Jones, Cracking Da Vinci’s Code (Colorado Springs: Cook Communications, 2004); Brandon Gilvin, Solving the Da Vinci Code Mystery (St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reception of Luke and Acts in the Period Before Irenaeus. Looking For
    Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament • 2. Reihe Herausgeber/Editor Jörg Frey Mitherausgeber / Associate Editors Friedrich Avemarie • Judith Gundry-Volf Martin Hengel • Otfried Hofius • Hans-Josef Klauck 169 Andrew Gregory The Reception of Luke and Acts in the Period before Irenaeus Looking for Luke in the Second Century Mohr Siebeck ANDREW GREGORY, born 1971; 2001 Doctor of Philosophy; currently Chaplain and Oakeshott Junior Research Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford, and a member of the Theology Faculty of the University of Oxford. ISBN3-16-148086-4 ISSN 0340-9570 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe) Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.ddb.de. © 2003 J. C. B. Möhr (Paul Siebeck) Tubingen. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Druckpartner Rübelmann GmbH in Hemsbach on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Schaumann in Darmstadt. Printed in Germany. for Katherine àvcv F|S OÙK Acknowledgements This monograph is the revised and expanded version of a thesis which was accepted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by the University of Oxford in November 2001. A number of institutions provided the financial support which enabled me to undertake this research, and I am glad to record my gratitude to them: the Arts and Humanities Research Board of the British Academy, which awarded me a Postgraduate Studentship in the Humanities; the Warden and Fellows of Keble College, Oxford, who elected me as Gosden Student and appointed me as Assistant Chaplain; and the Rector and Fellows of Lincoln College, Oxford who elected me to the Oakeshott Junior Research Fellowship and appointed me as Chaplain.
    [Show full text]
  • JUNG and the LOST GOSPELS Cover Art by Ann Kilgore
    JUNG AND THE LOST GOSPELS Cover art by Ann Kilgore Illustrations by Jan Saether STEPHAN A. HOELLER JUNG AND THE LOST GOSPELS INSIGHTS INTO THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS AND THE NAG HAMMADI LIBRARY This publication is made possible with the assistance of the Kern Foundation The Theosophical Publishing House Wheaton, III. U.S.A. Madras, India/London, England Copyright © 1989 by Stephan Hoeller A Quest original. First edition 1989 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without written permission except for quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. For additional information write to: The Theosophical Publishing House 306 West Geneva Road Wheaton, Illinois 60187 A publication of the Theosophical Publishing House, a department of the Theosophical Society in America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: Hoeller, Stephan A. Jung and the lost Gospels : insights into the Dead Sea scrolls and the Nag Hammadi library / Stephan A. Hoeller. — 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8356-0652-X ISBN 0-8356-0646-5 (pbk.) 1. Jung, C. G. (Carl Gustav), 1875-1961—Contributions in occultism. 2. Jung, C. G. (Carl Gustav), 1875-1961 — Contributions in gnosticism. 3. Dead Sea scrolls— Criticism, interpretation, etc. 4. Nag Hammadi codices— Criticism, interpretation, etc. 5. Occultism. 6. Gnosticism. I Title. BF1999.H623 1989 296.1’55—dc20 89-40174 CIP Printed in the United States of America Once again to Kristofer, dear friend and helper; and to Sidney and Jean Lanier, with grateful thanks Contents Foreword by June Singer .......................................... ix P re fa c e ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Early-Christianity-Timeline.Pdf
    Pagan Empire Christian Empire 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1 AD Second 'Bishop' of Rome. Pupil of Student of Polycarp. First system- Bishop of Nyssa, brother of Basil. Pope. The Last Father of the Peter. Author of a letter to Corinth, atic theologian, writing volumi- Bishop of Original and sophisticated theologi- model of St Gregory the Church. First of the St John of (1 Clement), the earliest Christian St Clement of Rome nously about the Gospels and the St Irenaeus St Cyprian Carthage. an, writing on Trinitarian doctrine Gregory of Nyssa an ideal Scholastics. Polymath, document outside the NT. church, and against heretics. and the Nicene creed. pastor. Great monk, and priest. Damascus Former disciple of John the Baptist. Prominent Prolific apologist and exegete, the Archbishop of Constantinople, St Leo the Pope. Able administrator in very Archbishop of Seville. Encyclopaedist disciple of Jesus, who became a leader of the most important thinker between Paul brother of Basil. Greatest rhetorical hard times, asserter of the prima- and last great scholar of the ancient St Peter Judean and later gentile Christians. Author of two St Justin Martyr and Origen, writing on every aspect stylist of the Fathers, noted for St Gregory Nazianzus cy of the see of Peter. Central to St Isidore world, a vital link between the learning epistles. Source (?) of the Gospel of Mark. of life, faith and worship. writing on the Holy Spirit. Great the Council of Chalcedon. of antiquity and the Middle Ages. Claimed a knowledge and vision of Jesus independent Pupil of Justin Martyr. Theologian.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcion Wrote New Testament
    Marcion Wrote New Testament Is Gustavus kymographic or gonidic after eliminative Giffer botch so intransitively? When Vinod retyped his tamales diapers not unsafely enough, is Marlon close? Dibasic and ascensional Samuel admiring: which Johnathon is towerless enough? In his epistles some commentators have on the spotless virginal bride of new testament In only the war Gospel in Marcion's Bible is two thirds of Luke Actually overcome's it. The Lord there with Jehoshaphat because he followed the ways of just father David before him. Mountains, North Africa, it is of true theme the intention of the scribes has some association with the sublimation of violence. New Testament books are authoritative, as a kind of figure of enlightenment, so Luke would only need familiarity with the OT to record this. He completely rejected the Old Testament as being relevant for Christians. Marcionite-Scripture Original-Biblecom. God were accompanied by a just as revolutionary idea about the identity of Jesus and his relationship to God. Either that wrote luke, whether this god is at sinope and testament marcion wrote. The Story going The Storytellers The Emergence Of flame Four. The situation obviously changed in the second century, which is not appropriate to make public before all, and a backsliding from the truth. Separatio legis et evangelii proprium et principale opus est Marcionis. It is accepted in his canon, because they do a decade or ten pauline authorship attestation prior to any other. Who wrote the new Testament DVD video 2004 WorldCat. It gained some esteem elsewhere, which teaches that appear are two opposed divine principles, this new Marcionism is a distortion of the finish to precise it align more closely to current ideologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Symbols and Quest for Truth in Modern American Literature
    Religious Symbols and Quest for Truth in Modern American Literature by Shahida Asghar Area Study Centre for Africa, North and South America Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan 2015 Religious Symbols and Quest for Truth in Modern American Literature SHAHIDA ASGHAR SUPERVISED BY: DR. RUKHSANA QAMBER A dissertation submitted to Area Study Centre, in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree of Doctor of Philosophy in American Studies AREA STUDY CENTRE FOR AFRICA, NORTH AND SOUTH AMERICA QUAID-I-AZAM UNIVERSITY ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN 2015 Area Study Centre for Africa, North and South America, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan CERTIFICATE This is to certify that we have read the dissertation entitled “Religious Symbols and Quest for Truth in Modern American Literature” submitted by Ms. Shahida Asghar. It is our judgment that it is of the sufficient standard to warrant its acceptance by the Quaid-i- Azam University, Islamabad for the Degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in American Studies. Supervisor____________________ External Examiner____________________ External Examiner____________________ Director___________________ iii DEDICATION To my parents, my mentor Dr. Rukhsana Qamber, Saeed, Husna, and those who dare to plunge into perilous vortices iv Acknowledgements All praise is due to almighty ALLAH with His compassion and mercifulness to allow me finalizing this Ph.D. project. My humblest gratitude to the Holy Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) whose way of life has been a continuous guidance for me. It was long journey to bring this thesis into its current form that was not possible without assistance, inspiration and guidance of several wonderful individuals — my thanks and appreciation to all of them for being part of my odeyssus to make this thesis possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trinitarian Theology of Irenaeus of Lyons
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects The Trinitarian Theology of Irenaeus of Lyons Jackson Jay Lashier Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Lashier, Jackson Jay, "The Trinitarian Theology of Irenaeus of Lyons" (2011). Dissertations (1934 -). 109. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/109 THE TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY OF IRENAEUS OF LYONS by Jackson Lashier, B.A., M.Div. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2011 ABSTRACT THE TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY OF IRENAEUS OF LYONS Jackson Lashier, B.A., M.Div. Marquette University, 2011 This dissertation is a study of the Trinitarian theology of Irenaeus of Lyons. With the exception of two recent studies, Irenaeus’ Trinitarian theology, particularly in its immanent manifestation, has been devalued by scholarship due to his early dates and his stated purpose of avoiding speculative theology. In contrast to this majority opinion, I argue that Irenaeus’ works show a mature understanding of the Trinity, in both its immanent and economic manifestations, which is occasioned by Valentinianism. Moreover, his Trinitarian theology represents a significant advancement upon that of his sources, the so-called apologists, whose understanding of the divine nature converges in many respects with Valentinian theology. I display this advancement by comparing the thought of Irenaeus with that of Justin, Athenagoras, and Theophilus, on Trinitarian themes. Irenaeus develops Trinitarian theology in the following ways. First, he defines God’s nature as spirit, thus maintaining the divine transcendence through God’s higher order of being as opposed to the use of spatial imagery (God is separated/far away from creation).
    [Show full text]
  • Of Antioch and the Heretics: a Study of a Primitive Christology by Issa A
    The Bisho~ of Antioch and the Heretics: A Study of a Primitive Christology By Issa A. Saliba Mr. Saliba, who is involved in lay ministry in Stoney Creek, Ontario, tells us that the following study arose from some research into early church christology for the benefit of lay people. His essay is ofparticular interest at a time when the place of the doctrine of the incarnation in early Christianity - and in modern - is the subject of lively debate. Our knowledge of Ignatius, the Bishop of Antioch is confined almost exclusively to the seven letters he wrote on his way to martyrdom in Rome early in the second century AD.l Those letters were addressed to the churches of Ephesus, Magnesia, Tralles, Philadelphia, Rome and Smyma and to Polycarp, the Bishop of that city. With the exception of the last two, the christology contained in those letters was spelled out to a great extent in the course of a polemic against heretical groups that were active in those ancient churches. The writer's intent was to confirm the Christians in their faith and to express his gratitude for those who 65 sent delegates to meet him on his way from Antioch to Rome, but most importantly, to sound a warning against the errors of Docetism whose advocates were seeking followers among the believers and, in many cases, causing division amongst them.2 Interestingly enough, it is from his persistent attacks against the teachings of the Docetists that we learn the major characteristics of the Bishop's theology, a theology which is decidedly christological in its orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • Critiquing the Sins of Scripture by John Shelby Spong John Makujina, Ph.D
    Modern Era Marcionism: Critiquing The Sins of Scripture by John Shelby Spong John Makujina, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Erskine Theological Seminary Introduction For almost two thousand years Christian theologians have attempted to harmonize the distinctive theological emphases of the two testaments. One of the earliest and most memorable attempts simply involved cutting the Gordian knot: Marcion of Sinope, unable to reconcile the benighted God of the Old Testament with Christ and the gospel, expelled the entire Old Testament and parts of the New from the Christian canon. Although Marcion was condemned as a heretic (A.D. 144), rejection of biblical passages and doctrines on ethical grounds is a pathology that continues to plague the church. The latest such voice comes from John Shelby Spong, the highly controversial Episcopal bishop and tireless opponent of historic Christianity, especially evangelicalism. In his recent book The Sins of Scripture: Exposing the Bible’s Texts of Hate to Reveal the God of Love (HarperCollins, 2005), Spong continues in the tradition of neo-Marcionists like Friedrich Delitzsch (Die grosse Täuschung, 1921). But whereas Delitzsch thrashed the Old Testament by measuring it against the New, Spong outdoes him, and many others, by subjecting both testaments to a remorseless flogging when he finds them in conflict with his modern sensibilities. In fact, contemporary ethics (environmentalism, feminism, religious pluralism, etc.) so dominate his thinking and regulate his critique of the Bible that his book is organized into eight sections, most of which are governed by some facet of the popular wisdom. The optimism generated by initial disclosures of his lifelong love for the Scriptures and dedication to Bible study (5-10) quickly evaporates amid a series of deeply condescending remarks against the Bible—amounting to cheap shots in many cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Gnosticism Notes
    Copyright © 2014, 2018 by Cory Baugher 1 KnowingTheBible.net Gnosticism Notes Gnosticism (“having knowledge”) was a prominent heretical movement of the third-century Christian Church. Gnostic doctrine taught that the world was created and ruled by a lesser and cruel divinity, the demiurge. Also, the Pleroma (“light”), the true God force, sent the spiritual Christ with esoteric gnosis (“knowledge”) to liberate the human spirit from the material realm. History Simon Magus of Syria (about 50s AD) claimed he was an incarnation of the God force come to rescue the divine thought of God (which was female) imprisoned in the material realm. He practiced magic and divination. He became a Christian to gain power (Acts 8:9-24) and mixed mystery religion ideas with Christianity. He was an Antinomian. Gnostics consider him a founding father. Marcion of Sinope (85–160 AD) believed that the teachings of Jesus Christ were incompatible with Yahweh, the belligerent God of the Old Testament. Taught that God of the Old Testament (Demiurge) is evil and inferior to the God of the New Testament (the Father), which is good. He believed that the Old Testament had to be set aside and so put together his own list of accepted New Testament books. He created his own New Testament church. He denied Jesus’ human body as an illusion. Valentinus of Alexandria (100–160 AD) developed Gnostic theology fully and founded his own school in Rome. He connected Gnostic ideas with the mystery religions and Plato. He taught that there were three kinds of people: Spiritual (his own followers) received the gnosis (“knowledge”) that allowed them to return to the divine Pleroma (“light”).
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography „Prieure De Sion“ and Rennes-Le-Chateau Ca
    Bruno Antonio Buike, editor / undercover-collective „Paul Smith“, alias University of Melbourne, Australia Bibliography „Prieure de Sion“ and Rennes-le-Chateau Ca. 1300 title entries © Neuss / Germany: Bruno Buike 2017 Buike Music and Science [email protected] BBWV E26 Bruno Antonio Buike, editor / undercover-collective „Paul Smith“, alias University of Melbourne, Australia: Bibliography „Prieure de Sion“ and Rennes-le-Chateau ca. 1300 title entries Neuss: Bruno Buike 2017 ---xxx--- 1. Dies ist ein wissenschaftliches Projekt ohne kommerzielle Interessen. 2. Wer finanzielle Forderungen gegen dieses Projekt erhebt, dessen Beitrag und Name werden in der nächsten Auflage gelöscht. 3. Das Projekt wurde gefördert von der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Sozialamt Neuss. 4. Rechtschreibfehler zu unterlassen, konnte ich meinem Computer trotz jahrelanger Versuche nicht beibringen. Im Gegenteil: Das Biest fügt immer wieder neue Fehler ein, wo vorher keine waren! 1. This is a scientific project without commercial interests, that is not in bookstores, but free in Internet. 2. Financial and legal claims against this project, will result in the contribution and the name of contributor in the next edition canceled. 3. This project has been sponsored by the Federal Republic of Germany, Department for Social Benefits, city of Neuss. 4. Correct spelling and orthography is subject of a constant fight between me and my computer – AND THE SOFTWARE in use – and normally the other side is the winning party! Editor`s note – Vorwort des Herausgebers preface 1 ENGLISH SHORT PREFACE „Paul Smith“ is a FAKE-IDENTY behind which very probably is a COLLCETIVE of writers and researchers, using a more RATIONAL and SOBER approach towards the complex of Rennes-le-Chateau and to related complex of „Priory of Sion“ (Prieure de Sion of Pierre Plantard, Geradrd de Sede, Phlippe de Cherisey, Jean-Luc Chaumeil and others).
    [Show full text]