Law in Context, Vol 36, Issue 1; 2019 LA TROBE EDITORIAL BOARD
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Law in context, Vol 36, Issue 1; 2019 LA TROBE EDITORIAL BOARD Pompeu Casanovas Jianfu Chen Emma Henderson General Editor Chair of the Editorial Board Book Review Editor Kerstin Steiner Savitri Taylor David Wishart Deputy General Editor Deputy Executive Editor Executive Editor Dina Afrianty Simon Huggard Nicholas Morris Jeff Barnes Magda Karagiannakis Andre Oboler Susanne Davies Fiona Kelly Lola Akin Ojelabi Louis de Koker Patrick Keyzer Tarryn Phillips Anne Wallace Commissioning Editor: Darren O’Donovan Treasurer: Lisa Egan (La Trobe Law School Manager) Editorial Assistants: Meredith Jones, Daniel McIntosh, David Venema INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD 1. Andrews, Penelope (La Trobe Univer- 10. Francesconi, Enrico (IGSG-CNR, Italy, 20. sity, Australia) and EUR-Lex, Luxembourg) Australia) Tranter, Kieran(Griffith University, 2. Araszkiewicz, Michal (Jagiellonian 11. Frug, Sara (Cornell University, USA) 21. Vallbé, Joan-Josep (University of Bar- University, Poland) celona, Spain) 12. Governatori, Guido (Data61, CSIRO 3. Baron, Paula (La Trobe University, and La Trobe University, Australia) 22. Valverde, Mariana (University of To- Australia) ronto, Canada) 13. Liu, Sida (University of Toronto, Canada) 4. Bennet Moses, Lyria (UNSW, Australia) 14. Montiel, Elena (Polytechnic University 23. Van Engers, Tom (University of Am- sterdam, The Netheralands) 5. Chen, Albert Hung-yee (University of of Madrid, Spain) Hong Kong, Hong Kong) 15. Noriega, Pablo (IIIA-CSIC, Spain) 24. Wang, Zhiqiong June (Western Sydney University, Australia) 6. Contini, Francesco (IGSG-CNR, Italy) 16. Pagallo, Ugo (University of Torino, Italy) 25. Wang, Jiangyu (National University of 7. Czarnota, Adam (UNSW, Australia) 17. Poblet, Marta (RMIT University, Australia) Singapore, Singapore) 8. Dignum, Virginia (Umeå University, 18. Rodríguez-Doncel, Víctor (Polytechnic 26. Wheeler, Sally (Australian National Sweeden) University of Madrid, Spain) University, Australia) 19. Schultz, Ulrike (German National Dis- 9. Fabri, Marco (IGSG-CNR, Italy) 27. Zeleznikow, John (Victoria University, tance Teaching University, Germany) Australia) Law in context, Vol 36, Issue 1, 2019 INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD 1. Abel, Richard (University of California Los Angeles, 16. Greenleaf, Graham (UNSW, Australia) USA) 17. Kirby, Michael (The Hon., AC CMG, Australia) 2. Antons, Christoph (University of Newcastle, Australia) 18. Mathews, Robert (University of Hawaii, USA) 3. Arup, Christopher (Monash University, Australia) 19. Mendelson, Danuta (Deakin University, Australia) 4. Ashley Kevin (University of Pittsburgh, USA) 20. Mendelsohn, Oliver (La Trobe University, Australia) 5. Bourcier, Danièle (CNRS, France) 21. O’Malley, Pat (Australian National University, Australia) 6. Brigham, John (University of Massachussets Amherst, USA) 22. Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio ( Metropolitan University of Caracas,Venezuela) 7. Bruce, Tom (Cornell University, USA) 23. Pitt, Jeremy (Imperial College, UK) 8. Chanock, Martin (La Trobe University, Australia) 24. Rotolo, Antonino (University of Bologna, Italy) 9. Di Federico, Giuseppe (IGSG -CNR, Italy) 25. Sartor, Giovanni (University of Bologna, Italy) 10. Ferrari, Vincenzo (University of Milan, Italy) 26. Scheiber, Harry N. (University of California Berkeley, 11. Fitzpatrick, Peter (Birkbeck, University of London, UK) USA) 12. Friedman, Lawrence (Stanford University, USA) 27. Schweighofer, Erich (University of Vienna, Austria) 13. Galanter, Marc (University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA) 28. Toharia, José Juan (Autonomous University of Ma- drid, Spain) 14. Garth, Bryant (University of California, Irvine, USA) 29. Tomasic, Roman (University of South Australia, 15. Goodrich, Peter (Cardozo School of Law, USA) Australia) Law in context, Vol 36, Issue 1; 2019 ISSN: 1839-4183 TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial: Law in Context for the Digital Age 3 By Pompeu Casanovas, Jianfu Chen, David Wishart, Context and Convergence: Some Remarks on the Law and Society Movement 12 By Lawrence M. Friedman Some Reflections on a Research Journey in Law and Society 21 By Martin Chanock Law’s Wars, Law’s Trials. The Fate of the Rule of Law in the U.S. ‘War on Terror’ 29 By Richard L. Abel Atticus Finch – Alive or dead? A Socio-legal Question 36 By Susanne Davies Lessons from the Financial Crisis and Other Banking Scandals 47 By Sue Jaffer, Nicholas Morris Between Constancy and Change: Legal Practice and Legal Education in the Age of Technology 64 By Zhiqiong June Wang Reflections on My Journey in Using Information Technology to Support Legal Decision Making—From Legal Positivism to Legal Realism 80 By John Zeleznikow A Brief History of the Changing Roles of Case Prediction in AI and Law 93 By Kevin D. Ashley Law in context, Vol 36, Issue 1, 2019 2 ISSN: 1839-4183 Received: August 30, 2019, Date of publication: September 25, 2019, DOI: http://doi.org/10.26826/law-in-context.v36i1.91 Editorial: Law in Context for the Digital Age By Pompeu Casanovas, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia, Orcid: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0980-2371 Jianfu Chen, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia, Orcid: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4711-6524 David Wishart, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia, Orcid: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-4745 ABSTRACT We introduce both the new inception of Law in Context - A Socio-legal Journal and the continuing issue of LiC 36 (1). The editorial provides a brief historical account of the Journal since its inception in the early 1980s, in the context of the evolution of the Law & Society movement. It also describes the changes produced in the digital age by the emergence of the Web of Data, Big Data, and the Internet of Things. The convergence between Law & Society and ArtificialKeywords Intelligence – & Law is also discussed. Finally, we introduce briefly the articles included in this issue. Acknowledgments.Law This in Context, edition and Law the launchand Society, of LiC is partiallySocio-legal funded research, by a La Trobe Artificial University Intelligence, Research Infrastructure Digital Society Plan grant. Disclosure statement – No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author. License – This work is under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Suggested citation: P. Casanovas, J. Chen and D. Wishart (2019). “Editorial: Law in Context for a Digital Age.” Law in Context, 36 (1): 3-11. DOI: http://doi. org/10.26826/law-in-context.v36i1.91. Summary 1. Law in Context (LiC) in context 2. Context and Law in the Digital Age 3. About this Edition: Law in Context for the Digital Age 4. Law in Context in Open Access LAW IN CONTEXT (LIC) IN CONTEXT Volume 36 (1) of Law in Context constitutes a renewed Mendelsohn (as General Editor), Martin Chanock (as Book Law in Context - A Socio-legal Journal. From 2019 onwards Editor) and Ian Patterson (as Business Manager). Although it will be published in Open Access at no cost to either the Law in Context (LiC) was launched after the retirement in authors or the readers. It thus represents a new stage in 1982 of E.K. Braybrooke, the charismatic founder of the the Journal’s long and fruitful history. Department, it retained his realistic stamp. It is worth The Journal was launched in 1983 at the then Depart- noting that many members of the so-called “First Legal ment of Legal Studies of La Trobe University by Oliver Scholarly Community” in Australia, after World War II, 3 Law in context, Vol 36, Issue 1, 2019 ISSN: 1839-4183 were closer to American legal realists than to English We can track this approach in practically all contribu- jurisprudence (Bartie 2010).1 tions and, especially, in the collective actions that were Since then, LiC has been continuously published due generated around the Journal and contributed to shape to the efforts and work of many people—Christopher its differential style and added values—e.g. the creation Arup, Paula Baron, Roger Douglas, Pat O´Malley, Margaret of legal clinics; the building of feminist discourses; the Thornton, to mention just a few. Law & Society world critical approach to the rule of law; the effort to (re)write leading scholars from USA, Europe and Asia (India)—such legal and institutional history; the defence of democracy as Richard L. Abel, Upendra Baxi, Stanley Cohen (†), Marc and citizenship; the description and criticism of corporate Galanter, Doreen McBarnet, Simon Roberts (†), and Harry practices and economic organisations; the emergence of N. Scheiber—served on the Editorial Board and have sup- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR); the close attention ported the journal since its inception. Looking at it from a distance, the coherence of LiC’s Asia and individual countries therein; and the support for to increasing numbers of immigration flows; the study of Mendelsohn, reads: recognition of Aboriginal rights, against the race-based trajectory is clear. Its first editorial, written by Oliver policiesthe cultural, that political sustained and segregation judicial fights in theseeking immediate for the Law in Context is published as a forum for the inter-disci- colonial past. plinary study of law. For much of the nineteenth and twentieth In 1988, the Australian Publisher Federation Press centuries there was a tendency to reduce the study of law to commenced publishing . Then, in 1995, the a narrow technical and doctrinal focus. This coincided with Law in Context former Legal Studies Department at La Trobe University a period when it was only lawyers who were interested in became La Trobe