DOCSLIB.ORG

Divided Cities' Leaders to Gather, Advise Iraqis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Divided Cities' Leaders to Gather, Advise Iraqis Divided cities’ leaders to gather, advise Iraqis By Kevin Baron, Stars and Stripes Mideast edition, Saturday, March 21, 2009 Photo courtesy of Padraig O'Malley Padraig O’Malley, a professor at the University of Massachusetts Boston, knows firsthand that it's possible for mortal enemies, even religious ones, to shake hands. Kevin Baron / S&S Sinn Fein party leader Gerry Adams speaks at the National Press Club March 16. "There’s no going back," Adams said. "The only way to go is forward." WASHINGTON — While political leaders from Ireland, Northern Ireland and the United Kingdom spent St. Patrick’s Day in the U.S. capital talking about preserving their fragile but sustained 11-year-old peace, an effort is under way in Boston to help transfer the lessons learned in Belfast, Derry and several other conflict cities around world to one of the most contested cities today: Kirkuk, Iraq. Padraig O’Malley, a professor at the University of Massachusetts Boston, is a one-man reconciliation crew. He knows firsthand it is possible for mortal enemies, even religious ones, to shake hands. In 1997, O’Malley brought a group of Northern Ireland negotiators to South Africa to learn how that country had found a lasting peace three years earlier. At first, the sides would not even share a hotel dining room, but soon barriers fell. One year later, the Irish Republican Army and the United Kingdom signed the Good Friday Agreement. A decade later, O’Malley convinced 16 Iraqis from Kirkuk to meet many of those same negotiators, including Martin McGuinness, the former IRA leader who now is deputy first minister, and Mac Maharaj, a prison mate of Nelson Mandela. McGuinness led a session alongside the Democratic Unionist Party leader Jeffrey Donaldson. The people from those countries shared how they found common humanity in their enemies and solutions out of conflicts. The resulting "Helsinki Agreement" that emerged last year is a framework to begin a reconciliation process in Iraq. For the next step, O’Malley is initiating a "club of divided cities," he said, in Boston, April 14-16. Mayors and council members will come from Kirkuk as well as from Mitrovica, which is split between Kosovo and Serbia; Nicosia, the divided capital of Cyprus, claimed by Turkey in the north and Greece in the south; and Derry and Belfast, Northern Ireland. O’Malley said Kirkuk council chairman Rizgar Ali Hamajan, who is Kurd, has put all of his muscle into getting other religious and ethnic groups to attend. Hamajan’s Iraqi delegation will include Shiite and Sunni Arab, Turkmen, Assyrian, and Christian leaders. "They all see the possibilities that exist here," O’Malley said. "That’s the important thing — these are not Ph.D.s, they are not theoreticians, they are not people who have some fancy program in mind. These are people who have learned by making mistakes. And they are saying to others you can learn the mistakes we made so you don’t have to repeat those mistakes yourself. It’s a very exciting time." O’Malley has visited Iraq 14 times in two years. "I’m as committed to it as I was to Northern Ireland or to South Africa," he said. He has secured support from Sen. John Kerry and Rep. William Delahunt, Massachusetts Democrats with key foreign policy posts in Congress. O’Malley’s is not the only effort to link Northern Ireland to Iraq through peace. In 2007, a National Democratic Institute mission brought nine senior members of Iraq’s Council of Representatives to meet with Good Friday Agreement negotiators in Belfast, including First Minister Ian Paisley and McGuinness, enemies-turned-political opponents who frequently appear together promoting peace. "There are people in the world who think a resolution of the situation in Iraq is impossible," said McGuinness. "I don’t accept that. Many people thought it was impossible that Dr. Paisley and I would even sit here in this room together. We overcame that impossibility and so can you." O’Malley has searched for Iraqi leaders who want to navigate the long, hard road to peace. "You are looking to people who will say that there is only one way forward in all of these situations, and that is through nonviolence," O’Malley said. The participating cities are at different stages of transition in their own reconciliation, he explained. "Some of them, like even in Northern Ireland after 10 years of peace, the wounds are still very, very deep. The grievances and the losses of the past are still just beneath the surface." Gerry Adams, the Sinn Fein party leader, sounded the warning at the National Press Club on Monday. "There’s no going back," Adams said. "The only way to go is forward." Adams said he is cautious to assume Sinn Fein has license to teach others about peace. "At the same time, we do have a duty to assist," he said, and that peace requires constant engaging. "Just because it isn’t in the news doesn’t mean you’re not involved in daily battles for equality and justice and harmony," Adams said. For O’Malley, and for Iraq, this is just the beginning. "Reconciliation is not something that can be achieved in five years or 10 years; it can take a generation or even three generations. We must understand that," he said. "That’s been the lesson of Northern Ireland, it’s in the lesson of South Africa and in Mitrovica — is that the absence of violence is not peace." .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WORSHAM-DOCUMENT-2019.Pdf
    Democracy and the Fallacy of the Post-Conflict Era in Northern Ireland The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Worsham, Nicole A. 2019. Democracy and the Fallacy of the Post- Conflict Era in Northern Ireland. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42004239 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Democracy and the Fallacy of the Post -Conflict Era in Northern Ireland Nicole A. Worsham A Thesis in the Field of International Relations for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University May 2019 © 2019 Nicole A. Worsham Abstract While Northern Ireland has experienced a period of relative peace since the signing of the Good Friday Agreement in 1998, entrenched, age-old tensions persist between those of opposing political persuasions, and between those of different religions. Those tensions continue to manifest themselves in ways which disprove the notion that Northern Ireland is in a post-conflict era. Further, demographic shifts, social changes, and external pressures make the status quo in Northern Ireland untenable. Profound uncertainty over Brexit now threatens the structure and foundation of government, and, perhaps of more immediate concern, the devolved local Executive and Assembly of Northern Ireland have collapsed, with little evidence that local government may be restored in the near term.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of the First Minister in Northern Ireland How Is the First Minister Selected?
    Role of the First Minister in Northern Ireland How is the First Minister selected? Under the Good Friday Agreement the largest party in the Northern Ireland Assembly, be they Unionist or Nationalist chooses a nominee for First Minister. What is the role of the First Minister in decision making? Despite the names the First Minister and deputy First Minister share equal responsibilities within government, and their decisions are made jointly. The First Minister greets official visitors to Northern Ireland and so in that way is the has an equivalent standing to the First Ministers of Scotland or Wales. The First Minister co-chairs meetings of the Northern Ireland Executive, co-ordinates the work of the Executive, and the response of the administration to relationships with other countries. The First Minister and deputy First Minister agree the agenda of Executive meetings and can jointly determine "significant or controversial matters" to be considered by the Executive. The First Minister’s other areas of responsibility include: economic policy equality before the law European Union issues human rights the machinery of government (including the Ministerial Code) public appointments policy standards in public life Who has held the role of First Minister? David Trimble UUP Ian Paisley DUP Peter Robinson DUP Arlene Foster DUP 1998-2002 2007-2008 2002-2016 2016-2017 Leaving Certificate Politics & Society Stand 1: Power and Decision Making Topic 2: Power and Decision Making at National and European Level. Leaning Outcome 2.2: Describe the way in which the Northern Ireland Executive is selected, and the ministers’ roles . .
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge of the Relationship Between Politics and Paramilitaries for Achieving Peace in Northern Ireland During the Troubles
    From Sunningdale to Good Friday: The Challenge of the Relationship Between Politics and Paramilitaries for Achieving Peace in Northern Ireland During The Troubles Cynthia Rudd McKaughan Faculty Advisor: Dr. Susan Thorne History March 27, 2018 This project was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Liberal Studies Program in the Graduate School of Duke University. Copyright by Cynthia Rudd McKaughan 2018 Abstract The British government made three official attempts to end the conflict in Northern Ireland, known as The Troubles: the Sunningdale Agreement of 1973, the Anglo-Irish Agreement of 1985, and the Good Friday Agreement of 1998. Drawing on media coverage and the actual text of each agreement, as well as the considerable body of scholarly research on each individual process, this project identifies the issues confronting the British government in all three instances: which organizations in Northern Ireland to include at the negotiating table, what role the British government would play in Northern Ireland in the treaty’s aftermath, what security measures to take to stop the violence while ensuring human rights, how to address the political challenges posed by paramilitary organizations, and whether or not to include other nations in negotiating the peace, as well as in Northern Ireland’s affairs once the Troubles ended. The Good Friday Agreement succeeded where its predecessors failed primarily because of the decision to include representatives of paramilitary groups despite their history of complicity in violence. All sides finally agreed to participate in a political power-sharing arrangement that militants on both sides long viewed as a betrayal to the cause for which they willingly killed and died.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.IRL Politics and Society in Northern Ireland
    5.IRL Politics and Society in Northern Ireland | Sample answer What was the contribution of Ian Paisley to the affairs of Northern Ireland? (2017) Despite the perspective taken on Ian Paisley, it is fair to claim that he was someone who contributed significantly to affairs in Northern Ireland. The often controversial figure was a mainstay in the social and political arena of the North for decades. Undoubtedly, while he was the thorn in the side for many of his adversaries – be they Nationalist or Unionist – he was an important focal point for the groups he represented. Possibly most famous for his inflammatory speeches in which he used his powerful oration skills to reveal what was a virulent anti-Catholic sentiment, he managed to be seen as a man largely advantageous to the Unionist community. Paisley’s contributions to Northern Ireland can be traced as far back as the 1950s. In 1951 founded the Free Presbyterian Church and in 1956 he joined Ulster Protestant Action in 1956, eventually becoming the group’s leader. The 1960s saw Terence O’Neill in charge of the province where he attempted to bridge gaps between the Nationalist and Unionist communities. This was met with vehement opposition by Paisley who was O’Neill’s constant critic. He saw any concessions to Catholics as an affront to Protestant and Unionist status in the North. He was particularly infuriated when O’Neill met with Irish Taoiseach at this time. In 1966 he founded the Protestant Telegraph which was to become a weekly newspaper, the perfect springboard for promoting the Unionist cause.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Role of Northern Irish Protestant Religious Denominations
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 2-1991 The Political Role of Northern Irish Protestant Religious Denominations Henry D. Fincher Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Fincher, Henry D., "The Political Role of Northern Irish Protestant Religious Denominations" (1991). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/68 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. - - - - - THE POtJ'TICAIJ I~OI~E OF NOR'TI-IERN IRISH - PROTESrrANrr REI~IGIOUS DENOMINATIONS - COLLEGE SCIIOLAR5,/TENNESSEE SCIIOLARS PROJECT - HENRY D. FINCHER ' - - FEnRlJARY IN, 1991 - - - .. - .. .. - Acknowledgements The completion of this project would have been impossible without assistance from many different individuals in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Republic of Ireland. I appreciate the gifts of interviews from the MP's for South Belfast and South Wirral, respectively the Reverend Martin Smyth and the Honorable Barry Porter. Li kewi se, these in terv iews would have been impossible without the assistance of the Rt. Hon. Merlyn Rees MP PC, who arranged these two insightful contacts for me. In Belfast my research was aided enormously through the efforts of Mr. Robert Bell at the Linen Hall Library, as well as by the helpful and ever-cheerful librarians at the University of Ulster at Jordanstown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Northern Ireland
    The Politics of Unionism in Northern Ireland Dominic Bryan The British Isles • Settlers - Plantations in 16th- and 17th-century Ireland • 18th Century: Loyalty, Protestantism and Orangeism • Grand Orange Lodge of Ireland • Act of Union 1800: the idea of a United Kingdom • The landed class and industrial class and a working class • The empire, the bible and the crown • The Irish Unionist Party • The Orange Order • Identity: Britishness – Irishness – Ulster Origins of Unionism • Also the Official Unionist Party or simply the Unionist Party • Derived from the Irish Unionist Party in 19th Century • Foundation – the Ulster Unionist Council of 1905 • Key role of the Orange Order • The role of the gentry and upper-class • Edward Carson, James Craig and the UVF • 1921 – Northern Ireland • Prime Ministers: Craig, Andrews, Brooke, O’Neil and Chichester-Clarke and Faulkner. • Northern Ireland – a study in political control • Ian Paisley and Civil Rights Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) • 1972: The end of Stormont • 1973: splits over the Sunningdale Agreement • Faulkner v Harry West • 1974: Vanguard and the United Ulster Unionist Council • Leader James Molyneaux 1979-1995 • Anglo Irish Agreement • 1995 – 2005 David Trimble and the Belfast Agreement • Division and Defeat. • Leadership of Sir Reg Empey and Mike Nesbitt • Leadership of Robin Swan Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) • Ian Paisley – life and times • 1966 -1971 The Protestant Unionist Party • More Unionist, more Protestant and more working class • Growth in popularity in 1980’s and 1990’s • Staunch opposition to the 1998 Agreement – No talking to terrorists! • Took there seats in Government • 2007: Largest Party in Assembly • First Minister • Peter Robinson and Arlene Foster.
    [Show full text]
  • North/South Ministerial Council Plenary Meeting
    NORTH/SOUTH MINISTERIAL COUNCIL PLENARY MEETING ARMAGH, 17 JULY 2007 JOINT COMMUNIQUÉ 1. The fifth plenary meeting of the North/South Ministerial Council (NSMC) was held at the Armagh City Hotel, Armagh on 17 July 2007. 2. The Northern Ireland delegation was led by the First Minister, The Rt Hon Dr Ian Paisley MP MLA and Deputy First Minister, Martin McGuinness MP MLA who jointly chaired the meeting. The Irish Government delegation was led by the Taoiseach, Bertie Ahern T.D. A full list of the members of both delegations is attached as an Annex. 3. Ministers acknowledged the significance of the occasion, the first meeting of the NSMC Plenary since 2002. They welcomed the opportunity to meet in the North South Ministerial Council to consult, promote mutually beneficial co-operation and take a number of decisions on a range of issues within the Council’s work programme. CROSS BORDER CO-OPERATION ON ROADS 4. The Council noted the Irish Government’s intention to make available a contribution of £400m/€580m to help fund major roads programmes providing dual carriageway standard on routes within Northern Ireland serving the North West Gateway and on the eastern seaboard corridor from Belfast to Larne. 5. The Northern Ireland Executive confirmed its acceptance, in principle, to taking forward these two major road projects. 1 6. The road project from Belfast to Larne will be taken forward by the Northern Ireland Executive and its agencies. 7. The route serving the North West Gateway will be taken forward in line with funding and accountability, planning, management and delivery arrangements agreed between the Irish Government and the Northern Ireland Executive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Language of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Gerry Adams Vs. Ian Paisley
    The Language of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Gerry Adams vs. Ian Paisley by Kim Grego INTRODUCTION The focus of this article1 is the language of conflict in Northern Ireland and, in particular, a comparison between the discourses of two major local politicians: Gerry Adams and Ian Paisley. These names may not be known at world level, as they are linked to a very specific local situation, but anybody with an interest in Northern Ireland’s past, present or future is certain to be familiar with them. Gerry Adams is the President of the extremist Republican party Sinn Féin. Over the years, his name has been widely associated to the Republican terrorist organisation IRA (Moloney 2002); the victims of Republican paramilitary violence between 1969 and 2001 were 2058 (Sutton 2001). Rev. Dr. Ian Paisley founded the extremist Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) in 1971 and led it until his retirement in 2008. Over the years, his name has been associated to 18 different Loyalist paramilitary groups;2 the victims of Loyalist paramilitary violence between 1969 and 2001 were 1018 (ibid.). In November 2003, the DUP and Sinn Féin came in first and second, respectively, in the Northern Ireland Assembly election, thus starting a long period of difficult talks in order to form a joint government between two traditionally enemy — not just opposed — parties. In May 2007, when a second general election confirmed the 2003 results, a government was eventually formed with Ian Paisley as First Minister and Martin McGuinness, then Gerry Adams’ second in command as Sinn Féin’s vice-president, as Deputy First Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of the Irish Language Under the English and British
    112 The Politics of the Irish Language always been very curious to me how Irish sentiment sticks in this halfway house — how it continues to apparently hate Barra Ó Donnabháin Symposium: the English, and the same time continues to imitate them; how it continues to clamour for recognition as a distinct nationality, and at the same time throws away with both The Politics of the Irish hands what would make it so.2 Language Under the English The centrality that Hyde accords to the language in Irish claims to nationhood is typical of the rhetoric of turn of the century cultural and British Governments nationalism. It’s also interesting that those opposed to Irish autonomy Sean Cahill and claims to nationhood posit the weakened state of the language as central to their delegitimizing claims. Clearly Gaelic, though Seán Ó Cathail demographically and even culturally peripheral at this point in time, was symbolically central in debates over the political future of Ireland. In the north of Ireland during and since “The Troubles,” there has been a strong connection between republicans and the Gaelic revival. We’re familiar with the joke, from the time when there were many republicans in prison: “Maybe Gaelic will die in the Gaeltacht, here is a strong connection between the Irish Gaelic language but it will survive in the gaoltacht.” (“Gaol” is the Irish-English 1 Trevival and politics. In the nineteenth century, Douglas Hyde, spelling for “jail.”) Sinn Fein activist Pádraig Ó Maolcraoibhe explains leader of the Gaelic League (Conradh na Gaeilge), portrayed Gaelic as the that for republican prisoners “stripped of everything” — including sine qua non of Irish national identity.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Years on from the Belfast Agreement
    Then and now: 10 years on from the Belfast Agreement FOREWARD BY JIM ALLISTER MEP 10 years ago on 10 April 1998 the iniquitous Belfast Agreement was concluded. Thereafter it languished in the face of Unionist rejection but sadly today it is being implemented in all its glory, because those who were instrumental in seeing it almost done to death have themselves breathed new life into it. Without the DUP volte face the Belfast Agreement was dead. There is lots of furious re-branding and repackaging going on, but the fundamentals of the Belfast Agreement survive. St Andrews did not alter its basic architecture. Yes, it had additional and evil transient elements, like outrageous prisoner releases, the destruction of the RUC and failure to deal with decommissioning, but it was much more flawed than that. The wicked legacy of its transient parts lives on, but its basic structures are themselves still very much with us. The basic structures of the Belfast Agreement were, and are, these:- • government by mandatory coalition, so that a party can never be voted out of office and Opposition is denied. The purpose, of course, is to guarantee IRA/Sinn Fein a permanent place in the government of the state they are dedicated to destroy. • the dysfunctional office of Joint First Ministers, OFMDFM, whereby equality is guaranteed for republicanism and the right of veto is enshrined by reason of the First Minister being unable to do anything - even sign a letter - without Sinn Fein's agreement. • entrenched north/south executive bodies to advance harmonisation on an all- Ireland basis.
    [Show full text]
  • UP DUP A4 Manifesto FINAL AW
    PROTECTING THE TAXPAYER CONTROLLING THE COST OF GOVERNMENT campaign03THE DUP’S VISION FOR DEVOLUTION FAIR DEAL MANIFESTO THE CHOICE FOR UNIONISTS THE BELFAST AGREEMENT OR A NEW AGREEMENT? THE UUP RECORD OF FAILURE 2003 ADIARY OF DECLINE OUR FULL MANIFESTO DUP MINISTERS INSIDE THIS MAGAZINE ARECORD OF ACHIEVEMENT DELIVERING AN EFFECTIVE POLICE SERVICE WORKING FOR BETTER POLICING THE BELFAST AGREEMENT MESSAGE FROM IS WRECKING NORTHERN IRELAND: THE LEADER: This election is Ulster’s date with destiny. I DON’T WANT It is the chance to put things right, to give a mandate to a strong and united Democratic Unionist team and to negotiate a new agreement. Stop and think how much has happened since 10th April 1998. Has it been the journey we were promised? The destruction of the RUC,the withdrawal of the Army,the release of terrorist FOUR prisoners,the elevation of Sinn Fein/IRA members to government office without evidence of the destruction of weaponry,the creation of ever-expanding all-Ireland institutions,the lawless state of our Province,the ever-growing list of breaches of MORE YEARS IRA and loyalist so-called ceasefires,the disregard of the views of peaceful and democratic politicians in favour of the spokesmen of terrorist organisations. OF Now imagine where Northern Ireland will be in another For unionist voters who face the prospect of Sinn four years if we allow the concessions to continue: Fein/IRA becoming the largest nationalist party in the Assembly the choice is clear - do they want republicans Terrorists running the police,a joint
    [Show full text]
  • BBC Attitude Survey 2006
    BBC Attitude Survey 2006 BBC Hearts and Minds November 2006 Full Results Who Took Part? Key Statistics Who Took Part? Key Statistics 1,100 persons in total responded to the survey. Interviews took place across all 18 Constituencies and 26 District Council Areas of Northern Ireland (43 sampling points in total). Fully representative results of Northern Ireland adult population in terms of age, gender, religion, geography and social class. Sex breakdown - Male (49%), Female (51%). Age breakdown - 18-24 (19.7%), 25-34 (20.2%), 35-44 (20.1%), 45-59 (20.7%), 60+ (19.1%). Socio-economic groupings - ABC1 (38.8%), C2DE (60.7%), refused (0.5%). Religion breakdown - Protestant (56.2%), Catholic (43.8%). Polling took place during the 27th - 30th October 2006. Margin of Error 2.95 %. The Results Each question is now analysed. Firstly, the total result and all percentages are listed. This is followed by the Unionist and Nationalist split. Note: The Unionist/Nationalist/Other profile is based on the responses provided at ‘Question 9’ - ‘If an election were held tomorrow to elect a new assembly, which of these parties would best represent your views?’ Q1. Do you think that Ian Paisley and Martin McGuinness will be installed as shadow first minister and deputy first minister, respectively, by 24th November? % TOTAL UNIONIST NATIONALIST OTHER Base: 1,099 584 439 66 Yes 31.0 33.4 28.2 31.8 No 69.0 66.6 71.8 68.2 Q1. Do you think that Ian Paisley and Martin McGuinness will be installed as shadow first minister and deputy first minister, respectively, by 24th November? % UUP SDLP DUP SF Alliance* Other Other Other* Unionist* Nationalist* Base: 195 185 336 221 38 53 33 28 Yes 40.5 35.1 29.5 24.4 23.7 32.1 15.2 42.9 No 59.5 64.9 70.5 75.6 76.3 67.9 84.8 57.1 * Note small bases Please note data excludes ‘not answered’ and ‘refused’ Q2.
    [Show full text]