FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 • NUMBER 57

Thursday, March 25, 196S • Washington, D.C. Pages 3851-3921

Agencies in this issue— Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Comptroller of the Currency Consumer and Marketing Service Economic Opportunity Office Engineers Corps Federal Aviation Agency Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Immigration and Naturalization Service Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau National Shipping Authority Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Administration Veterans Administration Wage and Hour Division Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Subscriptions Now Being Accepted

S L I P L A W S

89th Congress, 1st Session 1965

Separate prints of Public Laws, published immediately after enactment, with marginal annotations and legislative history references.

Subscription Price: /

$12.00 per Session

Published by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402

i & S A Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on^ on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Regi . ^ ay0Iiai FEDERAL®REGISTER LI address Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail adore ^ th0 Area Code 202 Phone 963-3261 fcy containe< -vwiTEo-WilTED’ nrcmvesArchives jsuuamg,Building, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to tnethe authority coni Admin- Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935' (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B b under regulations prescribedIbed by the tne ent istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I).I ) . Distribution is made only by the supe of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. payable m The F ederal R egister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year. . or money advance. The charge for individual copies ( minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to the size of the issue. Remit c order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. » «ties, pur* The regulatory material Appearing herein is keyed to the Code of F ederal R egulations, which is published, un5e -_intendent oi suantit to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended. The Code of F ederal R egulations is sold by the sup Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal R egister issue of each month. regulations. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R e g is te r 'or the Code of F ederal Contents

AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY Notices AND CONSERVATION SERVICE Rulesand Regulations Ports of entry; Los Angeles, Calif. 3886 Rules and Regulations Control zones and transition areas: Alteration______—— ------3857 INTERIOR DEPARTMENT Reconstitution of farms, allot­ Alteration, designations, and See Fish and Wildlife Service; ments, and bases; miscellaneous revocation______3859 Land Management Bureau. amendments------3855 Designations and revocation— (3857 AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Control zones, transition areas, INTERSTATE COMMERCE and control area extensions; COMMISSION See Agricultural Stabilization and alterations, designations, and Conservation Service; Con­ revocations (2 documents)_____ 3858 Notices sumer and Marketing Service. Transition areas: , Fourth section applications for ARMY DEPARTMENT Alterations (3 documents) _ 3859, 3860 relief______I ______3918 Designation______3860 Motor carrier : See Engineers Corps. Transition area, designation; and Broker, water carrier, and ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION revocation of control area ex­ freight forwarder applica­ tension.______3859 tions______fr______3894 Notices Proposed Rule Making Transfer proceedings______3918 Plutonium and uranium enriched Control zone, transition area, and in U-233; guaranteed- pur­ control area extension;, altera­ JUSTICE DEPARTMENT chase prices______* ______3886 tion, designation, and revo­ See Immigration and Naturaliza­ cation______3884 tion Service. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Federal airways; alteration and Rules and Regulations designation:______.______3884 LABOR DEPARTMENT Access to aircraft for safety pur­ Restricted area; alteration. ____ 3885 See Wage and Hour Division. poses; free transportation for Transition area; designation____ 3885 certain CAB, FAA, and Weather Bureau employees ______3860 FEDERAL MARITIME LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU Exemption of air carriers for COMMISSION Notices short-notice military contracts Notices Alaska; small tract classification; and substitute service______3861 correction______3886 Statements of general policy; m ili­ R. W. Smith & Co., et al.; agree­ tary exemptions and tariff rates. 3871 ments subject to cancellation— 3889 New Mexico; proposed withdrawal and reservation of lands______3886 Notices FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Oregon; offering of land for sale__ 3886 Air Traffic Conference of America; Notices order deferring action on agree- MARITIME ADMINISTRATION ment------3888 Hearings, etc.: Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co------3890 See National Shipping Authority. COMMERCE DEPARTMENT El Paso Natural Gas Co.______3890 Florida Gas Transmission Co___ 3890 NATIONAL SHIPPING See National Shipping Authority. Hope Natural G as Co______3890 Humble Oil & Refining Co------3891 AUTHORITY COMPTROLLER OF THE Illinois Power Co______3891 Rules and Regulations CURRENCY Lone Star Gas Co______3892 Marine protection and indemnity Rules and Regulations Mineral Mining Co. et al______3892 insurance instructions under Transwestern Pipeline Co______3892 general agency and berth agency Investment securities; M o b i l e Valley Gas Transmission, Inc__ 3893 agreements; miscellaneous Alabama, Board of Wheeler Gas Co______3893 amendments______3881 Commissioners Capital outlay School W arrants______3856 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Rules and Regulations SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE CONSUMER AND MARKE1 COMMISSION SERVICE Prohibited trade practices: Branford Co., Inc., et al______3878 Rules and Regulations Mr. Romano, Inc., et al_'______3879 Proposed Rule Making Director, Office of Opinions and New American Library of W orld Avocados grown in South Flor Review; authority delegation___ 3880 iaa' containers______*____ Literature, Inc., et alJ______3879 Vincent Cigar Co. et al______3880 Notices w fen se d e p a r t m e n t Equity Corp. et al.; filing of appli­ FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE cation______3893 See Engineers Corps. Rules and Regulations Sport fishing in Seney National SMALL BUSINESS ^ o f f ic e 110 OPPORTUNm Wildlife Refuge, Mich ______3882 ADMINISTRATION *md Regulations IMMIGRATION AND Rules and Regulations “ “ mlty action p ro gra m s... NATURALIZATION SERVICE Investment companies; examina­ tions and reports____.... ______3856 ENGINEERS c o r ps Rules and Regulations “ es and Regulations Nonimmigrant classes; special re­ TREASURY DEPARTMENT quirements for admission, ex­ 1 ^ * 1 » Cana: tension, and maintenance of See Comptroller of the Currency. •’ correction.______status______...______3855 ( Continued on next page) 3853 3854 CONTENTS

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION Rules and Regulations Adjudication; miscellaneous amendments______3881 WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION Proposed Rule Making Various industries in Puerto Rico; _ industry committees; hearings- 3883

List of CFR Parts Affected f (Codification Guide)

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1965, and specifies how they are affected.

7 CFR 17 CFR 719______3855 200______3880 P roposed R u l e s : 915______.______3883 29 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 8 CFR 602 ______3883 214 _ _ __ . ___ _ 3855 603 _ 3883 1 2 CFR 32A CFR i < _____ 3856 NSA (Ch. XVIII) : I N S - 1 ______— 3881 1 3 CFR 107 ______.______3856 33 CFR 1 4 CFR 207______3881 71 (10 documents)___ _ 3857-3860 224 ______------___ 3860 38 CFR 288 ______3861 3______v______3881 399 ______------^3871 P roposed R u l e s : 45 CFR 71 (4 documents). ______3884,3885 73______-1 — 3885 1030______3881 1 6 CFR 50 CFR 13 (4 documents) _ _ _ 3878-3880 33..... 3882 Rules and Regulations

domestic allotment for the reconstituted cotton, the domestic allotment for farms farm to which the m inim um cotton which qualified for additional price sup­ Title 7— AGRICULTURE domestic allotment provision applies pur­ port under section 103(b) of the Agricul­ Chapter VII— Agricultural Stabiliza­ suant to Part 722 of this chapter. tural Act of 1949, as amended, if smaller) for a commodity exceeds the final acre­ tion and Conservation Service 2. Paragraph (a) and subparagraph age for a commodity. (Agricultural Adjustment), Depart­ (2) of paragraph (b ) o f §719.7 of the ment of Agriculture regulations are amended as follows: ***** (Sec. 375, 52 Stat. 66, ae amended, 7 U.S.C. SUBCHAPTER B— FARM ACREAGE ALLOTMENTS § 719.7 Reconstitution of farm allot­ 1375; sec. 124, 70 Stat. 198, 7 U.S.C. 1812; AND MARKETING QUOTAS ments, history acreage, and farm secs. 16(b), 74 Stat. 1030, 16(c), 75 Stat. 5, [Arndt. 2] bases. 1 6 (d ), 75 Stat. 302, 105(c), 75 Stat. 301, 16 (a ) When to reconstitute. Farms (b ), 77 Stat. 45, 16 U.S.C. 590p) PART 719— RECONSTITUTION OF shall be reconstituted as soon as it is Effective date: Date of filing this docu­ FARMS, ALLOTMENTS, AND BASES determined that the land areas are not ment with the Director, Office of the Fed­ Miscellaneous Amendments properly constituted and, to the extent eral Register. practicable, shall be based on the facts This amendment is issued pursuant to and conditions existing at the time the Signed at Washington, D.C., on March section 375(b) of the Agricultural Ad­ change requiring the reconstitution oc­ 22,1965. justment Act of 1938, as amended (7 curred. For each farm reconstituted, the H. D. G o d f r e y , U.S.C. 1375(b)), section 124 of the Soil farm allotments, history acreages, and Administrator, Agricultural Sta­ Bank Act (7 U.S.C. 1812), and the Soil farm bases shall also be reconstituted in bilization and Conservation Conservation and Domestic Allotment accordance with the provisions of this Service. Act (16 U.S.C. 590 g -p ). This amend­ Part and county office records shall be [F.R. Doc. 65-3080; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; ment (1) restricts approval of reconsti­ corrected as necessary to reflect properly 8:48 a.m.] tutions where the request for reconsti­ the basic data for each farm as recon­ tution is determined to be for the pri­ stituted. mary purpose of establishing a cotton (b ) Effective date of reconstitutions. domestic allotment for the reconstituted * * * Title 8— ALIENS AND farm to which the minimum cotton do­ (2) Feed grain crops. If the farm re­ mestic allotment provision applies, (2) constitution is made: NATIONALITY clarifies the basis for reconstitution, of (i) Before any spring seeded feed mnns where changes requiring a recon­ grain crop has been (or would have been) Chapter I— Immigration and Natural­ stitution have occurred, and (3) provides planted or Form ASCS—477 is executed, ization Service, Department of Jus­ wmt the farm operator may choose whichever is later, the reconstitution tice or not the feed grain crops are shall be effective for feed grain crops to be effective for à newly reconstituted for the current program year unless: PART 214— NONIMMIGRANT iarai for the current program year under (a) The farm has a wheat allotment CLASSES certain conditions and (4) provides for for which the reconstitution will not be bsuig the cotton domestic allotment for effective under subparagraph (1) of this Special Requirements for Admission, iarms which qualified for price support paragraph, and Extension, and Maintenance of to compute underplanted acreage for the (b) The farm operator requests the Status P^Pose of determining allotment diver­ reconstitution not be effective for feed The following amendment to Chapter 1 sion credit. grains in order to participate in the of Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regu­ farms are now being reconsti- Wheat and feed grain programs. (If lations is hereby prescribed: h#> m it is essential that this amendment the reconstitution is a division, all inter­ The first sentence of subparagraph (1) Tt io u 6 e®ecWve as soon as possible, ested operators must agree; otherwise, Without visas of paragraph (c) Transits rnrlr y determined and found that the reconstitution shall be effective for of § 214.2 Special requirements for ad­ mrvSance the notice and public feed grains.) mission, extension, and maintenance of eS^V ^frem en ts, and the 30-day (ii) After any spring seeded feed grain status is amended to read as follows: of tw0Vf requirement of section 4 crop has been (or would have been) "Sfnt oioJn?lnistrative Procedure Act (60 planted or Form ASCS-477 is executed, § 214.2 Special requirements for ad­ and '»JL*' 5 1003) is impracticable whichever is later, the reconstitution mission, extension, and maintenance this n ^ r^ry bnhlic interest and shall not be effective for feed grain crops o f status. filin? tvní nen^ shall be effective upon for the current program year unless : * * * * * Officp w^th the Director, (a) The county committee determines (c) Transits— i l ) Without visas. Any t£ federal Register. that the reconstitution was warranted alien, except a citizen and resident of Fanm .Rations for Reconstitution of at the time any spring seeded feed grain the Union of Soviet Socialist Repub­ crop was (or would have been) planted 13370 ’ifiÎÏÎÎ*16111®* and B ases (29 F.R. lics, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, 1 ¿.ir!85 are amended as follows: or when Form ASCS-477 is executed, as Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Rumania, Bul­ (d). subparagraph (3) 0f paragraph applicable, and, garia, Albania^ Cuba, Communist-con­ (b) The farm operator agrees to mak­ • » « * 4 as^louows:*116 regulatlons 18 trolled China (“Chinese People’s Repub­ ing the reconstitution effective for the lic”), North Korea (“Democratic Peo­ 8^19.5 Farm constitution. current program year. ple’s Republic of Korea”), the Soviet. * * * * * 3. Subparagraph (3) of paragraph (a) Zone of Germany (“German Democratic (3) reconstitutions. * * * of § 719.10 of the regulations is amended Republic”), North Viet-Nam (“Demo­ as follows: cratic Republic of Viet-Nam”), and his land^iTw ^ reSuests in writing that which is ftAm0nge^ e included in a farm § 719.10 Determination o f commodity Outer Mongolia (“Mongolian People’s Republic”) , applying for immediate and rate ownSJ£Sedof tracts under sepa­ ' allotment diversion credit under the ration tjhcirP e* Cept that the recon- Conservation Reserve, Great Plains^ continuous transit through the United county be made where the and Land Use Adjustment programs. States, must establish that he is admis­ request fo í ^ ? teei • determines that the (a ) Definitions. * * * sible; that he has confirmed and on­ mary purnnts COPStrtution is for the p ri- (3) Underplanted acreage. ^Acreage ward reservations to at least the next Purpose of establishing a cotton by which the allotment (or, for upland country beyond the United States (ex- 3855 3856 RULES AND REGULATIONS cept that, if seeking to join an aircraft the provisions of paragraph seventh of R eg ister (30 F.R. 2613) concerning or vessel in the United States as a crew­ U U.S.C. 24. amendment of §§ 107.801 and 107.802 of man, he is in possession of, if joining a (b ) Opinion. The warrants were is­ the SB IC Regulation dealing with ex­ vessel, or makes application upon arrival sued by the Board of School Commis­ aminations and reports. for, a Form 1-184 permanent type land­ sioners of Mobile County, a public instru­ After due and careful consideration of ing permit and identification card, and mentality, pursuant to the Alabama the comments received, the Administra­ upon joining the vessel will remain School Warrant Act. They mature at tion has determined to adopt the formal aboard at all times until it departs from various maturity dates from February. amendments, set forth below, as being the United States, and his departure 1962 until 1979, being callable after Feb­ in furtherance of the best interests of the from the United States will be accom­ ruary 1966, in inverse numerical order SBIC program. plished within 5 calendar days after his on any interest payment date, and they The »present revision, as finalized in arrival), and that he has a document are payable from the proceeds of a the form al amendment published here­ establishing his ability to enter some county-wide ad valorem tax on the as­ with, adopts the text of the proposals country other than the United sessed valuation of all taxable property published on February 27, 1965. States. * * * in Mobile County. This tax has been In view of the Administrator’s deter­ * * * 4c * duly authorized at elections in said mination that it is necessary in the pub­ (Sec. 103, 66 Sta/t. 173; 8 U.S.C. 1103) county to be levied annually until 1991, lic interest that the revised provisions of and it has been irrevocably pledged for the SB IC Regulation appertaining to ex­ This order shall be effective on the payment of the principal and interest on aminations and reports (new §§ 107.801 date of its publication in the F ederal the warrants. and 107.802) shall be promptly applied R e g ister . Compliance with the provi­ (c) Rulings. Upon reconsideration, to the program authorized by the Small sions of section 4 of the Administrative it is the conclusion of this Office that the Business Investment Act of 1958, the Procedure Act (60 Stat. 238; 5 U.S.C. $1,500,000 Mobile County Board of present amendment shall become effec­ 1003) as to notice of proposed rule mak­ School Commissioners Capital Outlay tive upon publication in the Federal ing and delayed effective date is unneces­ School Warrants and similar warrants R eg ist e r . sary in this instance and would serve no issued by Board of School Commissioners The Regulations Governing Small useful purpose because the persons af­ pursuant to the same statutory authority Business Investment Companies are fected thereby will not require additional and which are supported by the same hereby amended as follows: time to prepare for the effective date of payment and security provisions are 1. By adding a new paragraph (f) to the regulation. “public securities” as defined in § 1.3(c) § 107.801. New paragraph (f) of § 107.- Dated: M arch 19,1965. issued pursuant to paragraph seventh of 801 will read as follows: 12 U.S.C. 24, and are therefore eligible R a y m o n d F. F arrell, § 107.801 Examinations. for dealing in, underwriting, and un­ Commissioner of limited holding by National Banks. Immigration and Naturalization. (f) Audit and Examination Guide. [F.R. Doc. 65-3070; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; Dated: March 18,1965. Reference should be made to the Audit 8:48 a.m.] [ s e a l ] J am es J. S a x o n , and Examination Guide for Small Busi­ Comptroller of the Currency. ness Investment Companies, as amended, filed with the Office of the Federal Regis­ [F.R. Doc. 65-3025; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; ter as part of the original document. 8:45 a.m.] Title 12— BANKS AND BANKING The Audit and Examination Guide for Small Business Investment Companies, Chapter I— Bureau of the Comptroller which is incorporated in arid expressly of the Currency, Department of the made a part of this section, has been pre­ Treasury Title 13— BUSINESS CREDIT pared by SBA to inform Licensees and independent public accountants engaged PART 1— INVESTMENT SECURITIES v AND ASSISTANCE by them as to S B A ’s requirements con­ REGULATION Chapter I— Small Business cerning audits and examinations oi Mobile County, Ala., Board of School Administration S B IC ’s. Copies of such Audit and Ex­ amination Guide are made available to Commissioners Capital Outlay [Amdt. 7 (Rev. 3 )] Licensees and their independent pubnc School Warrants accountants through the Office of Clue This amendment is issued pursuant to PART 107—-SMALL BUSINESS Accountant, Small Business Administra­ the authority granted thp Comptroller of INVESTMENT COMPANIES tion, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Wash­ ington, D.C., 20416, and at aU Area the Currency under paragraph seventh Examinations and Reports of 12 U.S.C. 24. Since this is an inter­ Offices of the Small Business Adminis­ pretive ruling, notice, public procedure, Pursuant to authority contained in tration, the addresses of which offices and delayed effectiveness are not re­ section 308 of the Small Business Invest­ may be obtained from the office of quired. Accordingly, this amendment ment Act of 1958, Public L aw 85-699, 72 Deputy Administrator for Small Business Administration, 811 ve - will be effective upon publication. Stat. 694, as amended, there is amended, mont Avenue NW., Washington, V. •• Section 1.158, Part 1, Chapter I, Title as set forth below, Part 107 of Subchap­ 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations of ter B, Chapter 1 of Title 13 of the Code 20416. - -'V -i the United States of America is hereby of Federal Regulations, as revised in 29 -2. By deleting paragraphs (b), ^ ); (f)’ amended to read as follows: F.R. 16946-16961, and amended in 30 F.R. (g), and (i) of § 107.802 and substituting 534, 1187, 2652, 2653, 2654, and 3635 by in lieu thereof new paragraphs ’ § 1.158 Mobile County, Ala., Board of amending §§ 107.801,’ 107.802, and sub­ (f), (g), and (i). As amended, para School Commissioners Capital Out­ stituting in lieu of the Financial Report, lay School Warrants. graphs (b), (d ), (f), ,an<* S B A Form 468, and instructions for prep­ § 107.802 will read as follows: (a ) Request. The Comptroller of the aration thereof referred to in § 107.802 Currency has reconsidered his ruling (h ), the amended Financial Report, SBA § 107.802 Reports. with respect to whether the $1,500,000 Form 468, and Instructions for Prepara­ * Mobile County, Ala., Board of School tion of the Financial Report (SBA Form (b) Reports to sfocfcfioMers. At ffie Commissioners Capital Outlay School 468) published on February 27, 1965 (30 time any financial report ^ c^ublic|tion Warrants dated February 1, 1961, and F.R. 2613, 2614), which will henceforth prospectus, letter, or other or similar warrants issued by Board of be referred to in paragraph (h) of with respect to the financial its 4 School Commissioners pursuant to the § 107.802. operations of the Licensee or ny. fur. same statutory authority are eligible for Information and effective date: On portfolio small business concerns) of dealing in, underwriting and unlimited February 27,1965, notice of proposed rule nicViivt investors and shareho .. holding by National Banks pursuant to making was published in the F ederal Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3857 to the Investment Division, Small Busi­ ing the applicability of this report in ness Administration, 811 Vermont Ave­ fulfilling the Commission’s requirements Title 14-AERONAUTICS AND nue NW., Washington, D.C., 20416, three for financial reports. (3) copies of such report. SPACE ( f ) Designations: Whenever any as­ Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency sets are pledged as collateral or are ear­ (d) Forms for financial reports. The [Airspace Docket No. 64-CE-98] financial reports required by this section marked for segregation under a negative to be submitted to SBA by Licensees shall pledge or similar agreement, the identity PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL be on the prescribed form constituting of the assets pledged or earmarked shall AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, the Financial Report, S B A Form 468, be indicated in the portfolio schedules AND REPORTING POINTS which is designed for submission in part supporting the statement of financial or in its entirety. Part I requires state­ condition. Whenever amounts are clas­ Alteration of Control Zone and ment of financial condition, statement sified as “current” and “noncurrent,” Transition Area of statutory capital and surplus, state­ “current” shall refer to the amount ma­ ment of realized gain or loss on invest­ turing within 1 year and “noncurrent” On January 13, 1965, a notice of pro­ ments, statement of income and ex­ shall refer to the amount maturing after posed rule making was published in the pense, and Schedules 1 and 2.. Part II 1 year. If, however, an amount will ma­ F ederal R egister (30 F.R. 445) stating requires supporting Schedules 3 through ture within 1 year but is not reasonably that the Federal Aviation Agency pro­ 10, and Part III requires supporting expected to be paid when due, it shall be posed to alter controlled airspace in the Schedules 11 through 20. classified as “noncurrent.” vicinity of Janesville, Wis. (1) Part I, together with any sched­ (g ) Obtaining forms for report. The Interested persons, were afforded an uled) of Parts n and III that may be Financial Report, SBA Form 468, as opportunity to participate in the rule specified, comprises the interim report amended, and the Instructions for making through submission of com­ required to be submitted, upon request Preparation of the Financial Report ments. All comments received were by SBA, for any period of 1 month or (SBA Form 468) are filed with the Fed­ favorable. more. Parts I and II comprise the re­ eral Register Ofiice as part of the orig­ In consideration of the foregoing, Part port required to be submitted to SB A inal document. Copies of the Financial 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is covering the first 6 months’ period of Report, SBA Form 468, as amended, to­ amended effective 0001 e.s.t., M ay 27, each fiscal year. Parts I, II, and III gether with amended instructions for 1965, as hereinafter set forth: comprise the annual report required to preparation of such report, are available (1) In § 71.171 (29 F.R. 17581) the be submitted to SB A covering the entire at the Investment Division, Small Busi- • Janesville, Wis., control zone is amended fiscal year. With the exception of the ness Administration, 811 Vermont Ave­ to read : annual report, the Financial Report shall nue NW., Washington, D.C., 20416, and Ja n e sville , W is . be submitted in triplicate to the Invest­ at all Area Offices of the Small Business Within a 5-mile radius of Rock County ment Division, Small Business Adm in­ Administration, the addresses of which Airport, Janesville, Wis. (latitude 42°37'12" istration, 811, Vermont Avenue NW ., offices may be obtained from the office of N., longitude 89°02'25'' W .), and within 2 the Deputy Administrator for Invest­ miles each side of the Janesville VOR 038° Washington, D.C., 20416, on or before radial, extending from the VOR to a point the last day of the month immediately ment, Small Business Administration, 11.5 miles NE of the VOR, see Airman’s In­ following the close of the period covered 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, formation Manual for hours of designation. by the report. Such annual report shall D.C., 20416. (2) In § 71.181 (29 F.R. 17643) the be submitted in triplicate to the In­ * * * * * Janesville, Wis., transition area is vestment Division, Small Business A d - (i) Other reports. In addition to the mimstration, 811» Vermont Avenue NW ., amended to read: reports required elsewhere in this sec­ Washington, D.C., 20416, on or before Ja n e sville , W is . tion, each Licensee shall, upon request by in day of the third month follow- SBA, submit to the Investment Division, That airspace extending upward from 700 close of the fiscal year for SBA feet above the surface within an 8-mile Small Business Administration, 811 Ver­ Purposes to which such annual report radius of the Rock County Airport, Janesville, relates. mont Avenue NW., Washington, D.C., Wis. (latitude 42°37'12'' N., longitude 89°- 20416, such other reports at such times (2) When the Licensee has one or more 02'25” W .); and within 5 miles SE and 8 miles and in such forms as SBA shall require. NW of the Janesville VOR 239° radial, ex­ C « offices, the data contained in the tending from the 8-mile radius area to 12 ic financial statements and all sup- 3. By deleting and substituting in lieu miles SW of the VOR; and within 2 miles each ^bedules shall comprise a con- of the Financial Report, SBA Form 468 side of the Janesville VOR 038° radial, ex­ of ^he figures for the principal (2-62), and Instructions for Preparation tending from the 8-mile radius area to 20 flm e and all branches. All money of the Financial Report (SBA Form 468) miles NE of the VOR. Z T i s raided to be shown, in the fi- (2-63) referred to in § 107.802(h), (Sec. 307(a) Federal Aviation Act of 1958; be J ! statements and schedules may amended Financial Report, SBA Form 49 U.S.C. 1348) tmn !?re^.ec* tn even dollars, at.the op- 468 (3-65), and Instructions for Prepa­ dato „ Licensee. If the financial ration of the Financial Report (SBA Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on March Drannf1? expressed in even dollars, ap- Form 468) (3-65), which will henceforth 12,1965. amnnn+ v adjustments of individual constitute the documents referred to in H e n r y L. N e w m a n , Dart Af5 stlad made for the fractional paragraph (h) of § 107.802. Said Acting Director, Central Region. add tJ+i! x0llar so that the items will amended Financial Report (3-65) and [F.R. Doc. 65-3029; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; Renm-t e totals shown. The Financial Instructions for Preparation thereof 8:45 a.m.] Prespnf pfrepared by each Licensee shall (3-65) have been filed with the Office of the I ipe^air^y tbe financial position of the Federal Register as part of the origi­ [Airspace Docket No. 64-WE-69] covered of the close of the Period nal documents the I ipo« report and the results of p a r t 71— designation o f f e d e r a l Dated: M arch 19, 1965. and shnnSi?e s op€rations for such period, AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, the detail^ p.repared in accordance with By direction of Eugene P. Foley, Ad­ AND REPORTING POINTS SBA Forme468nStrUCti° nS accomPanying ministrator, Small Business Adminis­ tration. Designation of Control Zone and under ttiieilsees re 3860 RULES AND REGULATIONS

[Airspace Docket No. 64-CE-101] In § 71.181 (29 F.R. 17686) the portion NE of the VOR, and that airspace NE of Pocatello bounded on the SE by a line 5 PART 71 — DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL of the Oklahoma City, Okla., transition area extending upward from 1,200 feet miles SE of and parallel to the Idaho Falls, AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, Idaho, VOR 206° radial, on the SW by a line above the surface is amended to read: extending from latitude 43°06'30" N., longi­ AND REPORTING POINTS That airspace extending upward from 1,200 tude 112°13'30'' W., to latitude 43°09'00" N„ Designation of Transition Area feet above the surface within a 57-mile radius longitude 112°17'00" W., on the NW by V-21 of latitude 35°25'50" N., longitude 97°35'10" and on the NE by latitude 43°17'00" N. On January 14, 1965, a notice of pro­ W., within 6 miles SE and 9 miles NW of the (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, posed rule making was published in the Oklahoma City VORTAC 242° radial, extend­ as amended; 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348) F ederal R egister (30 F.R. 489) stating ing from the 57-mile radius area to 52 miles that the Federal Aviation Agency pro­ SW of the VORTAC, within 6 miles S and 9 Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on March miles N of the Oklahoma City VORTAC 282° 17,1965. posed to designate controlled airspace radial, extending from the 57-mile radius in the vicinity of Mitchell, S. Dak. N ed K. Zartman, area to 62 miles W of the VORTAC, and Acting Deputy Director, Interested persons were afforded an within the area bounded on the E by longi­ W ester n Region. opportunity to participate in the rule tude 96°54’00'' W., and on the W by longi­ making through submission of comments. tude 97°18'20'' W., extending N from the [F.R. Doc. 65-3038; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; All comments received were favorable. 57-mile radius area to latitude 36°26'00" N., 8:45 am .] In consideration of the foregoing, Part excluding the portion N of a line extending 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is from latitude 35°54'00" N., longitude 98°- 25 W ' W., to latitude 35°48'00” N „ longitude Chapter II— Civil Aeronautics Board amended effective 0001 e.s.t., M ay 27, 98°18'00'' W., to latitude 36°03'00" N., lon­ 1965, as hereinafter set forth: gitude 97°23'30" W., to latitude 36°13'25" SUBCHAPTER A— ECONOMIC REGULATIONS In § 71.181 (29 F.R. 17643) the follow­ N., longitude 97°18'20'' W. [Reg. ER-433] ing transition area is added: (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; M itch ell, S. D a k . 49 U.S.C. 1348) PART 224— ACCESS TO AIRCRAFT That airspace extending upward from 700 FOR SAFETY PURPOSES: FREE Issued in Fort Worth, Tex., on March TRANSPORTATION FOR CERTAIN feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius 18,1965. of the MitcheU, S. Dak., Airport (latitude A. L. C oulter, CAB, FAA AND WEATHER BUREAU 43°46'25" N., longitude 98°02'25" W .), within 2 miles each side of the 322° bearing from Acting Director, Southwest Region. EMPLOYEES the Mitchell Airport extending from the 6- [F.R. Doc. 65-3037; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics mile radius area to 8 miles NW of the airport 8:45 a.m.] Board at its office in Washington, D.C., and within 2 miles each side of the 125° on the 22d day of M arch 1965. bearing from the Mitchell Airport extending In EDR-53, Docket 14418, dated April from the 6-mile radius area to 13 miles SE [Airspace Docket No. 65-WE-6] of the airport; and that airspace extending 3, 1963 (28 F.R. 3421), the Board pro­ upward from 1,200 feet above the surface P A R T 71 — DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL posed amendment arid reissuance of Part within 5 miles NE and 8 miles SW of the 322 ° AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, 224 of the Economic Regulations (14 CFK bearing from the Mitchell Airport extending Part 224). The amendment would from the airport to 12 miles NW, and within AND REPORTING POINTS have authorized air carriers to provide 5 miles SW and A miles NE of the 125° bear­ Alteration of Transition Area free transportation to certain additional ing from the Mitchell Airport extending from « F A A employees consisting of key per­ 4 miles SE to 17 miles SE of the airport. On February 10, 1965, a notice of pro­ sonnel who have overall responsibility (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Apt of 1958; posed rule making was published in the for developing and executing the Agen­ 49 U.S.C. 1348) F ederal R egister (30 F.R. 1877) stating cy’s air carrier safety programs and that the Federal Aviation Agency pro­ personnel assigned to specific researc Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on March posed the alteration of the Pocatello, and development projects. The tmieior 12,1965. Idaho, transition area. filing comments was extended from May H e n r y L. N e w m a n , Interested persons were afforded an 6, 1963, to June 20, 1963 (EDR-53A, Acting Director, Central Region. opportunity to participate in the rule 28 F.R. 4722). Comments were receivea [F.R. Doc. 65-3036; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; making through submission of com­ from the Air Transport Association oi 8:45 a.m.] ments. All comments received were America on behalf of 22 air „ favorable. from the Airways Engineering Sc^iety, [Airspace Docket No. 64-SW-57] In consideration of the foregoing, Part professional association of the engi > 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is technicians and specialists of the PART 71 — DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL amended effective 0001 e.s.t., June 24, eral Aviation Agency. „oHprai AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, 1965, as hereinafter set forth. On December 29, 1964, the Fed AND REPORTING POINTS In § 71.181 (29 F.R. 17690), the Poca­ Aviation Agency wrote to the Boar<^ tello, Idaho, transition area is amended ing that as a result of comments receive Alteration of Transition Area to read: in response to the Boards no > mission with the Air Transport Assocm That airspace extending upward from 700 On January 6, 1965, a notice of pro­ tion and reexamination of posed rule making was published in the feet above the surface within 5 miles SE and 4 miles NW of the Pocatello ILS lo­ icies and-needs it was now of ^ the F ederal R egister (30 F R . 97) stating calizer NE course, extending from the arc of a that Part 224, insofar as it affects that the Federal Aviation Agency pro­ 5-mile radius circle centered on the Poca­ free transportation of FAA emP y posed to alter the controlled airspace in tello Municipal Airport (latitude 42°54'35" adequate for current P A A n e ^ _ ^ the Stillwater, Okla., terminal area. N., longitude 112°35'25'' W .) to 8 miles NE Agency statgd that it would ha ^ This notice of proposed rule making was of the OM; within the area bounded on the jection therefore to «»serve initially published as Docket 63-SW-60. W by a line 2 miles W of and parallel to the Pocatello VOR 015° radial, on the SE by a proposed rule making kut ^ roD0Sais to Subsequent to the publication of this line 4 miles NW of and parallel to the Poca­ the right to make flutu^® pto carry out notice in the F ederal R eg ist e r , action tello ILS localizer NE course, on the NE by amend Part 224 as necessary of the was taken to correct this Docket No. to the arc of a 13-mile radius circle centered its Statutory obligations. I n 1 £ Agency, 64-SW-57 which was published in the on the Pocatello VOR, and on the S by the position of the Federal Aviatio” A J » £ F ederal R egister (30 F.R. 1057) on Feb­ arc of a 5-mile radius circle centered on the Pocatello Municipal Airport; that airspace we find that amendment of ^® Ration ruary 2,1965. tion to authorize the re. Interested persons were afforded an extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within 9 miles E and 6 miles W of the of additional FA A employees is no opportunity to participate in the rule Pocatello VOR 167° radial, extending from quired in the public in^er^ , i' tion in ad- making through submission of comments. the VOR to 18 miles S of the VOR; within 9 The Air Transport Ass^iato^ ^ All comments received were favorable. miles N and 8 miles S of the Pocatello VOR dition to questioning th® f 1®1 ®°sted two In consideration of the foregoing, Part 252° radial, extending from the VOR to 18 additional FAA employees, sugg at 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations miles SW of the VOR; within 6 miles SE and changes in § 224.1 and. a J g g _ ami ^ is amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., M ay 27, 10 miles NW of the Pocatello VOR 045° 1965, as hereinafter set forth. radial, extending from the VOR to 27 miles Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3861 riers are required to give free transporta­ is accompanied by the statement in writ­ [Reg. ER-432] tion to FAA safety inspectors and C AB ing prescribed in § 224.3(c). PART 288— EXEMPTION OF AIR CAR­ safety investigators. W e are not per­ § 224.3 Requests for access to aircraft RIERS FOR SHORT-NOTICE MILI­ suaded that such changes should be and free transportation. adopted. There has been no showing TARY CONTRACTS AND SUBSTI­ that the free transportation authorized Access to aircraft and free air trans­ TUTE SERVICE under the regulation as now drafted ex­ portation shall not be granted to persons Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics ceeds that required by safety personnel eligible under this part unless the follow­ Board at its office in W ashington, D.C., for the performance of their official func­ ing conditions are complied with: on the 17th day of M arch 1965. tions. If the carriers have specific com­ (a) The person to be transported shall On January 26, 1965, by notice of pro­ plaints as to violations of the present present to the appropriate agents of the posed rule making EDR-79/PSDR-10 regulation by any government employees air carrier credentials or a certificate (30 F.R. 998), the Board proposed cer­ the Board expects that they will be called indicating that he is entitled to request tain amendments to Parts 288 and 399 of to the attention of the agency involved access to aircraft or free transportation its regulations (Docket 15808). W ith re­ and, if not corrected, brought to the and signed by the Chief, Office of Adm in­ spect to Part 288, the notice proposed (1) Board’s attention under normal com­ istration, Civil Aeronautics Board, the reductions in minimum rates for Cate­ plaint procedures, a Administrator of the Federal Aviation gory B military charters for periods be­ In the notice of rule making we pro­ Agency or the Chief, Weather Bureau, ginning July 1, 1965 (other than intra- posed to rearrange, restate and shorten or any official of their agencies they may Alaska, Pacific inter-island, and to or various other provisions of the regula­ designate and signed also by the person from the Canal Zone or Puerto Rico); tion. No objections were expressed to presenting such credentials or certificate. (2) separate minimum rates for passen­ such revisions, which serve to clarify (b) The person to be transported shall ger and cargo legs of convertible serv­ the regulation, and they will therefore be deliver to the appropriate agents of the ices; (3) a sliding scale of rates for adopted. Other proposals for changes air carrier, in duplicate, a properly exe­ round-trip mixed passenger-cargo serv­ by the carriers to the extent not adopted cuted “Request for Access to Aircraft or ices; (4) minimum aircraft loads for the herein are denied. Free Transportation” (U.S. Government Lockheed Hercules 382 turboprop cargo In consideration of the foregoing, the Standard Form No. 160). aircraft and for convertible flights with Board hereby amends and reissues Part (c) When free transportation is re­ turbojet and CIr-44 aircraft; and (5) 224 of the Economic Regulations (14 CFR quested pursuant to § 224.2 involving amendment of the definition of round- Part 224), effective April 24, 1965, as more than one free trip within a calendar follows: year by the same individual on the same trip services. Written data, views, and arguments Sec. carrier, the person to be transported shall, at the time of performance of each have been filed in response to the notice. 224.1 Safety Inspectors. In addition, at the request of several car­ 224.2 Traffic control and communications such additional trip, present to the ap­ riers, the staff held an informal con­ personnel and aviation weather fore­ propriate agent of the air carrier a state­ casters. ment in writing by the Administrator of ference at which interested persons were 224.3 Requests for access to aircraft and free the Federal Aviation Agency, or—the afforded an opportunity to present their transportation. Chief, Weather Bureau or any official of views orally. No objections were re­ 224.4 Responsibility o f the Federal Aviation their agencies they may designate, that ceived regarding the proposed minimum Agency and the Weather Bureau. the additional trip or trips by the person cargo loads for convertible flights or the Authority: The provisions of this Part 224 named, between the points designated proposed amended definition of round- f u n d e r secs. 204(a), 301-814, 403, 404, and on the type of aircraft specified trip services. These amendments are toROM and 1701 * Federal Aviation Act-of therein, is solely for the'purpose specified therefore, adopted as proposed. All writ­ Stat. 743, 744-754, 758, 760, 775-780, in § 224.2 and is essential to the effective ten and oral comments and supporting uf,7?!i49 U s c - 1324> 1341-1355, 1373, 1374, 1421-1430, and 1441. performance of Federal Aviation Agency materials before the Board with respect or Weather Bureau functions. to the other proposals have been care­ »224.1 Safety inspectors. (d) The air carrier shall insert the fully considered, and all contentions not Evwy air carrier shall carry, without tariff value of the transportation to be otherwise disposed of hereinafter are re­ jected. Final amendments to Part 399, any aircraft which it operates furnished on each “Request for Access to Statements of General Policy, are being nf authorized official or employee Aircraft or Free Transportation,” shall retain one copy of each such request, and adopted concurrently herewith (PS-26). Atron Board or of the Federal Aviation Minimum rates adopted. This pro­ Z r * .wh0 has been assigned to the on or before the 10th day of each month ceeding encompasses an overall review of f>raf+°umspe?tinS during flight such air- each air carrier shall forward one copy minimum rates for air transportation ttmtl* a^hies, propellers, appliances, of all such requests received by it during performed for the Department of De­ *acillties. operational procedures or the second preceding calendar month to Amnan competency. the Bureau of Economic Regulation, Civil fense. As in past Part 288 rate reviews, Aeronautics Board, Washington, D.C., the carriers were informally requested to § 224.2 Traffic control and communica- 20428. submit cost data, and the proposed new ons personnel and aviation weather minimum rates were based upon these forecasters. § 224.4 Responsibility of the Federal data as adjusted by the Board. The cost Aviation Agency and the Weather data have been further adjusted in light c h a r carr!er may carry withoi Bureau. anv trnffi any aircraft which it operat< of comments received, and revised ap­ mun, ^ c controller or aircraft corn The Federal Aviation Agency and the pendix pages are attached hereto.1 Agencv n the Federal Aviatio W eather Bureau shall be responsible for: Although a number of the carriers casterTSftv,aviation weather for« (a) The Issuance of proper credentials commenting supported some reduction in supervisin'6 ^ eather Bureau (includir or certificates to personnel eligible here­ Part 288 minimum rates, the carriers the pm-nnf ° ® cers of such persons) f< under; and generally opposed reduction to the pro­ posed levels.2 The Department of De- acquaiS?«^ °?.®ore fully and adequate] (b) The promulgation of such internal rules as may be required to obtain com­ control 9«^ fu-mgnt use of air traf pliance by such personnel with this part. 1 Appendices A and B filed as part of origi­ nal document. forecast^ communications and weath ote N : The reporting requirements of the 3 Twelve MATS contractors filed comments Govemmf^D68 provlded by the U. regulations in this part have been approved with respect to proposed amendments to request fn?: f roiHded> however, T h at i by the Bureau of the Budget in accordance Part 288: Airlift International, Inc., Alaska transportation und with the Federal Reports Act of 1942. Airlines, Inc., Continental Air Lines, Lie., The t a a S a l o S “ be made »<* ‘ he ear By the Civil Aeronautics Board. Flying Tiger Line Inc., Northwest Airlines, than once 4J?°n ^ y one air carrier mo Inc., Seaboard World Airlines, Inc., The Slick Carp., Southern Air Transport, Inc., Trans trips are r^fl?H^Calendar year (roui [ s e a l ] H arold R. S a n d e r s o n , Secretary. Caribbean Airways, Inc., Trans International Eposes nf?5?d d “ one trip for t; Airlines, Inc., Trans World Airlines, Inc., and quest for si,ei1S/f.Ction) nnless the r [F R . Doc. 65-3078; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; World Airways, Inc. No comments were filed ch additional transported;!» 8:48 a.m.] by Capitol Airways, Inc., or by Pan American 3862 RULES AND REGULATIONS fense (DOD) generally concurred in the Board has adopted revised minimum are still in use and still command market proposed rate reductions but urged fur­ rates. The existing minimum rates, prices in excess of their book values. ther modification of some of the rates There is presently no reason to believe those proposed in the notice, and those proposed. that the turbojet aircraft now in use and Upon consideration of the comments adopted herein for turbine-powered air­ being acquired will not enjoy at least a received and the adjusted cost data, the craft are as follows: 12-year useful life and maintain a rea­ sonable residual value. Present Proposed Adopted Several carriers contend that new sub­ rates rates rates sonic turbojets, that are being designed with greater capacity and range may Passenger flights (per passenger-mile): *Cents Cents Cents render present turbojets obsolete within Round trip______2.55 2.20 2.20 a few years. The Board is not aware of One way—______4.20 3.75 3.96 Cargo flights (per ton-mile): any contemplated radically different air­ Round trip: craft that would have that effect. In North Pacific.—...... _ ...... It 00 9.50 9.75 Other areas______>...i______10.50 9.00 9.50 our opinion, current turbojets have suf­ One way: ficient range and capacity, and operate North Pacific...... *______20.00 16.80 18.13 Other areas..______„ ______19.00 15.80 17.63 at sufficiently low unit costs, not to be Convertible flights: made suddenly obsolete by the advent of Both legs (per passenger-mile)______2_.55 any new subsonic turbojets presently Passenger leg (per passenger-mile)______2.35 2.35 Cargo leg (per ton-mile): ~ under design consideration. However, North Pacific.--.______Id 95 11.25 if future developments should justify a Other areas..______10.45 11.00 Mixed traffic flights: change in outlook, there is no reason Round trip (per passenger-mile)...... 2.55 why depreciation could not be acceler­ Round trip (scale per plane-mile): ated in a later annual rate review. $3.69-$3.88 $3.79-$3.88 Seaboard’s suggestion that aircraft Other areas...... 3.52- 3.88 3.71- 3.88 costs should be standardized for depre­ ciation is not accepted. Although pro­ The minimum rates adopted herein costs were derived from jcarrier fore­ jection of service life is admittedly a for MATS charter services beginning casts of MATS charter operations in fis­ matter of judgment, data as to actual July 1,1965, reflect reductions in varying cal year 1966 which the Board adjusted cost of aircraft are readily available, and degrees from the current rate levels. For to the extent deemed appropriate for the Board has used these data in its passenger charters, in which round-trip rate-making purposes. As noted therein, calculations. flights predominate, the rate reduction is the adjustments relating to aircraft The Board has adopted neither the 13.5 percent. For cargo charters, which utilization, flight-equipment deprecia­ longest nor the shortest service life pro­ are principally one way, the rate reduc­ tion, anticipatory cost increases, and the jected by the carriers for turbojet air­ tions are a little less, reflecting a 9.5-per­ investment base had the most significant craft. Rather, in the exercise of in­ cent cut for North Pacific flights and a impact on unit cost levels. The com­ formed judgment, we have concluded 7-percent reduction in other areas. For ments submitted by the carriers and DOD that a 12-year service life and 15-per- convertible charters (i.e., passengers in in response to EDR-79 are addressed to cent residual value are realistic in view one direction and cargo in the other), these m ajor areas and to numerous other of industry practice and the facts the rate reduction should average about matters as well. presently available. . , 9 percent. Aircraft depreciation. W ith respect to Aircraft utilization. The earners The Board undertook the instant pro­ depreciation of turbojet flight equip­ forecasts for fiscal 1966 reflected varying ceeding as a part of the continuing sur­ ment, the notice proposed a uniform 12- evels of aircraft utilization, which m veillance which we have maintained over year service life and 15-percent residual some instances amounted to reduction the MATS minimum rates since their value. Although a 10-year life had been from experienced levels and in otne inception in 1960 in order to insure that used previously, it apeared that a 12- represented increases over experienced the rates will be fair to both the carriers year life would be more consistent with rates. In developing the rates proposea and M ATS. In the course of the current the realistic useful life expectancy of in EDR-79, the Board accepted w proceeding, the Board has carefully re­ modern turbojet aircraft. Six carriers utilization rates projected by Aiassa- viewed the latest actual cost data to­ favor retention of the 10-year basis.3 Continental, Pan American, Trans car gether with carrier forecasts of opera­ The principal contention is that more of ibbean, T W A , and Flying Tiger. sinc tions and costs in the coming fiscal year. the ten MATS contractors base turbojet pach forecast was either close to or some Generally speaking, various factors, in­ depreciation on 10 years than on 12. what above recent carrier system ex cluding declining unit costs, improved However, this contention overlooks the perience and did not appear to be m aircraft utilization, greater reliance on fact that, in the industry as a whole, the reasonable. On the other ha . jet aircraft, longer depreciation lives, air carriers owning the preponderance utilization forecast by Northwest, and a reduced corporate tax rate, as of turbojet aircraft use a service life of board, Trans International, a.nd J f : d compared with circumstances obtaining 12 years or more.* It should also be noted was below recent system experience,an, when the current rates were established, that most piston aircraft have outlasted the Board adjusted those estima underlie the indicated rate reductions. their projected depreciable life by several reflect approximate system utiliz We are satisfied that the rates adopted years, and these fully depreciated aircraft herein are fair both to MATS and to the 6 The utilization rates estimated by ^ carriers and that the carriers will have 3 Continental, Northwest, Seaboard, Slick, ift, Capitol, and Slick presented spec a reasonable opportunity to cover their Trans International, and World. Slick has problems. The Board construed A® costs of operation and achieve a fair no turbojet aircraft that are being used in iift’s forecast utilization to be 6.2 “0 profit. providing airlift for MATS under current per day. Airlift in its comments hem contracts. has stated that its forecast was act l j Costs of service. The revised mini­ 4 American, Eastern, Pan American, and predicated on 7.93 hours. We find ^ mum rates for MATS overseas and for­ United employ a 12-year life, 15-percent eign charters proposed by EDR-79 were residual value, or its equivalent, in depre­ utilization to be reasonable d£da predicated upon estimates of carrier unit ciating their jet aircraft. In addition, Na­ corrected the Airlift adjust G ^0i costs of operation plus a 9-percent return tional and Western apply the 12-year, 15- accordingly. While Airlift and Cap ^ percent policy to a portion of their jet fleets. on investment after taxes. Those unit projected aircraft utilization « Among the current MATS contractors, Air­ pr slightly above their rece:ntXP teS lift and Trans Caribbean, in addition to Pan World Airways, Inc. The comments of Alaska American, use the 12-year, 15-percent policy the Board considered that the su and Southern relate only to specific piston or its equivalent. As of September 30, 1964, were nevertheless belowa l e v ^ t ^ services and are discussed later herein. In approximately 300 jet aircraft, representing reasonably be achieved. „«Hzation addition to the MATS contractors, United about 60 percent of the jet aircraft operated Board adjusted C apitoFsut^^ Air Lines, Inc., filed a general comment also by the U.S. civU air carriers, were being discussed later herein. depreciated on a 12-year basis.

/

4 9 Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 386â

Capitol had achieved close to 8 hours’ tions being conducted by the carrier. and except as noted finds no basis to utilization in the third quarter of 1964; On the contrary, it is far more appropri­ modify them. Those recognized rates of and both the other supplemental car­ ate and equitable that the categories of utilization are close to carrier-expe­ riers, Trans International and W orld, cost directly responsive to aircraft utili­ rienced utilization on a system basis, realized better than 7 hours’ utilization zation— depreciation, hull insurance, except where specific factors and con­ during the 12 months ended September amortization of preoperating expenses, siderations warranted a departure from 30, 1964. As regards Slick, which had and capital costs— be prorated among the experienced levels, and appear reason­ projected a reduction in utilization, we several services in accordance with the able and capable of attainment. believed that the introduction of the relative use of the aircraft in such Abnormal volume of nonrevenue mile­ CL-44 aircraft into the carrier’s domes­ services. age. Four carriers, Airlift, Flying Tiger, tic scheduled cargo services would result In this connection, Northwest contends Northwest, and Trans Caribbean, con­ in a significantly higher level of over­ that system utilization may not be ap­ tend that the air carriers’ costs per reve­ all utilization. Therefore, we adjusted propriate in all circumstances, as for ex­ nue plane-mile, recognized in EDR-79 Slick’s estimate of 6.5 hours to 8.5 hours. ample where an aircraft is assigned full and underlying the proposed rates, are In this connection, we were influenced by time or where a disproportionate amount too low in that no recognition is given to the fact that Plying Tiger and Seaboard of nonrevenue flying is required for the the disproportionate amount of nonreve­ had realized 8.1 and 94 hours, respec­ MATS operation. While we believe that nue mileage required to be operated in tively, on a system basis in the 12 months the MATS rates should normally be connection with MATS charter services. ended September 30,1964, and that Slick predicated upon system aircraft utiliza­ These nonrevenue flights are said to stem itself had achieved 8.0 and 7.7 hours, re­ tion, there may be situations in which from pre- and post-positioning ferry spectively, in the second and third quar­ a different treatment is warranted, as in flights to and from MATS bases, ferry ters of 1964.“ the case of Trans Caribbean, supra. flights from the MATS terminal to the Eight of the carriers and D O D have Similarly, Northwest’s point about the carrier’s maintenance base, various types commented on EDR-79 in this regard. nonrevenue mileage appears to be valid, of check flights, weather diversions, and As earlier noted, Airlift points out that as will be discussed subsequently herein. aborted flights. In addition, Airlift also we misconstrued its utilization estimate, Trans International and World both appears to contend that rates should be and we herein will correct, our adjust­ contend that 7 hours’ utilization is too established herein to provide separate ment of the carrier’s forecast. Trans high for their operations, while DOD and specific compensation for the ferry Caribbean now states that its forecast suggests it is too low. Northwest also flights between the carrier’s base and utilization, 9.3 horns, was in error and objects to our upward adjustment of the the origin and termination points of the should be reduced to 8.3 hours on the supplemental carriers’ utilization esti­ MATS-eharter. basis of actual utilization in M A T S serv­ mates. As earlier described, the 7-hour MATS charter services are normally ices in the last 6 months of 1964 and esti­ level appears to be reasonable for this performed between military bases and mated MATS utilization for the first 6 class of carrier on the basis of their re­ thus would require some degree of ferry months of 1965. Although Trans Carib­ cent experience. Nothing has been ad­ flights to and from the carrier’s com­ bean is currently achieving system utili­ duced by the comments to cause us to mercial airports or maintenance base. zation well above the 9.3-hour level it modify our conclusion in this regard. The incidence would depend on the par­ now desires to reduce, we believe it is While it is true that each of the three ticular carrier and circumstances, e.g., reasonable to base the utilization for supplemental carriers has achieved utili­ the proximity of the MATS terminal to MATS rate purposes on that carrier’s zation rates in excess of 7 hours in very the carrier’s commercial routes or base, actual MATS experience in the last 6 recent periods, the earlier experience of and whether the MATS schedule pro­ jnonths of 1964, namely 8.8 hours, rather Capitol and TIA was much lower. It vides for back-to-back flights or a sub­ than its system utilization. W e recog­ would be unsound to predicate the sup­ stantial interval in between charter trips. nize that TCA’s M ATS operation is so far plemental carriers’ utilization rates on It appears that in at least some instances distant from its commercial routes that peak experienced levels; but, on the other such ferry flights would exceed normal its ability to integrate M ATS and com­ hand, the carriers’ estimates are unduly ferrying in commercial services. In cir­ mercial operations is severely limited. conservative, especially in the light of cumstances where there is a significant Moreover, the level of utilization being their expanding commercial operations. interval between charter trips, it would Teamed by TCA in its M ATS operations Seaboard ^argues that the Board be neither feasible nor desirable to allow appears reasonable in itself and leaves should recognize its forecast of 7.08 the aircraft to stand idle at the MATS comparatively little room for use in com- hours for the DC-8F, since its MATS terminal. On the contrary, in most in­ nfu ^ serv^ces on the other side of the services would, in fact, produce utiliza­ stances carriers attempt to make other united States. tion of only 6.3 hours. As earlier indi­ revenue-producing use of the aircraft Several carriers— Seaboard* Slick, cated, we believe it appropriate to base during such intervals and it is in the .¿¡5“’ frtemationai, and World— argue utilization for purposes of this proceed­ light of that circumstance that the the d e utilization rates recognized by ing upon system averages. Seaboard’s Board normally predicates the MATS rierairline there are many improvements under operations and costs before concluding labor and materials has been largely off­ consideration and development relating that the MATS ferrying is greater than set by improvments in efficiency. In ad­ to operating procedures (e.g., reduced that reflected in average costs or that a dition, there were other instances in landing minimums), traffic handling cost adjustment is warranted. which the support for an increase was techniques, better hardware and elec­ Airlift’s apparent desire for a. separate not set forth in sufficient detail to enable tronics, and maintenance procedures rate to cover the positioning of ferry the Board to determine whether the in­ which should tend to offset adverse wage flights does not appear feasible. Provi­ crease was allowable or not. In such and price trends. The Board also has sion for an additional charge to MATS, cases, we disallowed the increase pend­ been and is influenced in this regard by over and above the normal charge for the ing receipt of additional information. a concern that the determination of rates live flight, based on the distance of Four carriers commented in this area for future applicability would be ren­ M ATS’ terminal from the carrier’s base, either with respect to the policy in gen­ dered even more hazardous if we were would inject an element which would eral or its application in particular in­ compelled to evaluate in detail each car­ vary from carrier to carrier and possibly stances. Northwest, TWA, and Airlift rier’s judgments and estimates of future even from flight to flight. The price to present data showing that at least por­ price and wage increases. Moreover, in­ MATS of moving a stated amount of tions of the future cost increases they formation about future operational im­ traffic between stated points would be projected are not speculative but reflect provements and efficiencies which may affected by this factor, and thus would firm contracts. Northwest presents re­ be achieved is peculiarly within the not be ascertainable in advance and vised data showing the impact of wage knowledge of air-carrier management. would vary between carriers and trips. increases in the past or near future for It is only realistic to expect that came From the carriers’ standpoint, their flight crews, cabin attendants, and main­ estimates of cost increases would be mo prices to M A T S would not be competitive, tenance personnel resulting from signed freely given than information about pos­ since their home bases would not be the contracts. TW A states that its projected sible efficiencies. In these circumstances, same in all instances, and the lowest- increase in crew salaries, disallowed by we are satisfied that the sounder P- price carrier (i.e., the nearest carrier) the Board, is directly attributable to proach for rate-making purposes, ana would have a material advantage price- existing or fully negotiated labor agree­ fairest to both carrier and user, is t wise over the other carriers which would ments, Airlift states that certain esti­ adhere to known costs and to limit fu be unacceptable in the present context mates of increased costs related to cabin adjustments to those items which can of M A T S procurement policies. In these attendants’ pay and expenses, included be definitively supported. circumstances, we are convinced that in Its forecast for fiscal 1966 and dis­ Available Total Operating Expenses Per the MATS rates must be structured so allowed by the Board, have been resolved route Am To n -M ile for All Certificated that the point-to-point price to MATS, at a 15-percent increase effective Janu­ Carriers Cents per passenger or unit of cargo, is the ary 15, 1965. Recognition of these re­ Cents same for all carriers. However, as noted vised cost increases is consistent with the 28.57 Board’s policy with respect to such 1947_____ . 35.82 1956. 28.54 above, we would deem the costs of such 35.42 1957. matters, and appropriate adjustments 1948_____ 29.15 necessary ferry flights to be a proper cost __ 33.83 1958. will be made to the cost data developed 1949_____ 29.94 of these M ATS charters to be recognized ■ 31.50 1959. in EDR-79. 1950 ____ 29.91 in determining the rates. Similar con­ 1951______31.58 1960. 28.77 Slick’s comments are more general, _ 31.61 1961. siderations underlie our treatment of 1952__ __ 26.36 going to the validity of our basic policy 1953______30.62 1962. 24.87 one-way MATS charters. Although it is in this area. In summary Slick con­ 1954______29.50 1963. 23.53 1964’ obvious that the backhaul ferry flight tends that the Board is inconsistent in 1955------_ 28.38 generates substantial costs related to the projecting future increases in aircraft »Twelve one-way MATS charter, we have con­ utilization, with attendant reductions in sistently reflected those costs in deter- unit costs, on a generalized and factually 8 Note, for example, the overaUdov^w^ unsupported basis while at the same time rend of total operating c Pf con- 7 The percentage was subsequently ad­ refusing to accept carrier forecasts of on-mile in the postwar eraRespite tn justed to 12.4 percent. future cost increases. Slick also argues rary trend of wage and price le 3865 Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER decrease net overhaul and maintenance The short answer to Slick’s contention lift also seeks a greater allowance for expense over a reasonable period. that we applied a generalized and fac­ traffic servicing costs per revenue mile to Tiger singles out a number of instances tually unsupported approach to forecast­ cover the cost of converting aircraft from in which other carriers’ unit costs are ing future increases in aircraft utilization a passenger to a cargo configuration. below average in one category or an­ and thus we are inconsistent with, our Such costs appear to be more appropri­ other,“ while Seaboard takes general policy on projected cost increases is that ately considered as aircraft servicing exception to inclusion of unit costs which we did no such thing. As heretofore dis­ rather than traffic servicing expense. It appear to be below average. In each in­ cussed in connection with the aircraft must be assumed that such costs are re­ stance noted by Tiger, the recognized utilization issue, in only two instances did flected in the carrier’s base-period ex­ cost per mile is at or above the carrier’s we apply a level of utilization different penses and that a fair share is allocated actual experience, and the data before from the carriers’ own forecasts or actual to the M A T S services on the basis of total us afford no basis or reason for making experience. One of those instances in­ miles flown in the respective operations.9 an increase in such costs. Moreover, volves Capitol, where we applied the same Plying Tiger claims that its recognized there are numerous “above average” 7-hour daily utilization level used for, passenger service cost per revenue mile unit costs in the spectrum which received and experienced by, the other two sup­ is understated by virtue of its computa­ equal weight in determining the pro­ plemental carriers operating MATS tion on the basis of total revenue miles posed rates. Seaboard would apparently charters. The other instance involves instead of revenue miles flown in pas­ have the Board eliminate from consider­ Slick itself. But as earlier noted our de­ senger service. In reviewing the various termination to increase Slick’s forecast carrier forecasts, the Board concluded ation the two lowest unit costs shown for utilization from 6.5 hours to 8.5 hours per that Tiger’s projected level of passenger- each category of cost irrespective of the day, herein modified to 8.0 hours, was service expense was excessive in relation reason for such cost level. Such ap­ based on the belief that the use for the to the unit costs experienced by the proach we believe would be just as un­ first time of the CL-44 aircraft in domes­ other carriers. Accordingly, we recog­ fair to MATS as basing the rates solely tic scheduled cargo services as well as in nized for Tiger a level of passenger serv­ on the lowest costs would be to the MATS charters would produce higher ice expense per passenger-mile equal to carriers. utilization on a system basis. In any that of the other CL-44 operators, Sea­ It is by no means unusual that a large event, no downward cost adjustment to board and Slick. The unit costs used for group of diverse carriers would show reflect increased utilization was made to those carriers were computed on pre­ different unit cost levels both with re­ any of the categories of cost for which cisely the basis that Tiger urges, namely, spect to particular categories of cost and Slick projected future increases. O ur by use of revenue plane-miles only in in total. These results stem from nu­ approach to those categories of cost was passenger service. Therefore, we find no' merous factors both within and beyond simply to allow the unit cost levels ex­ basis for correction of this element of an individual carrier’s control. The perienced by Slick in the 12 months ended EDR-79. Board has not in this or earlier proceed­ September 30,1964. Tiger in its comments now presents a ings adjusted either the high or low costs With respect to the timing of this rate new claim for additional traffic servicing on that ground alone. Only where a proceeding in relation to fiscal year 1966, costs related to the off-loading of cargo particular category of cost is far out of the Board recognizes the practical diffi­ at Bangkok, Saigon, and Kimpo, which line with the remainder of the industry culties which substantial and unforeseen it states is performed at the carrier’s and is otherwise unexplained does the changes in circumstances m ay cause. expense. The extent -to which traffic Board make a cost-level, adjustment. While it is our intention that the rates handling and other ground service func­ In this proceeding such adjustments Axed herein remain in effect throughout tions are performed by MATS or by the have been very limited and could have fiscal year 1966 absent some development carrier tends to vary from base to base. only token effect on the rates. The which would materially affect the nature In any event, however, it must be as­ Board’s approach to these rates is to and costs of these contract services, there sumed that such costs as are in fact in­ attempt to ascertain each carrier’s rea­ is nothing to preclude one or more ear­ curred by the carriers are reflected in sonable cost level and then establish a ners or DOD from requesting the Board their experienced expenses which form rate level with due regard for each car- to modify some or all of these rates in the basis for the 1966 estimated coste. . rier’s cost as well as the aggregate cost such eventuality. We see no basis for a further allowance for the group, recognizing that under Miscellaneous cost adjustments. Sev­ related to these three points. any uniform rate some carriers will fare eral carriers (1) have presented correc­ Finally, we note that Seaboard points better than others In our judgment it tions of data previously submitted, (2) out an erroneous adjustment related to would be completely inappropriate to jusagree with certain adjustments made backhaul ferry mileage which the carrier base the rates on either the lowest-cost oy the Board in EDR-79, (3) claim al- did not in fact perform. Appropriate pr highest-cost carriers. Rate of return. Seven carriers objected rrLance for additional costs, and (4) modification of Seaboard’s adjusted costs ,~®?nt generally on cost levels recog- is made in the appendix hereto. to the Board’s proposal to continue use ea by the Board. Some modifications Continental, Flying Tiger, and Sea­ of the 9-percent rate of return adopted re50gPized costs appear warranted board also present a series of arguments in ER-401 (March 1, 1964) J? In urging riofo7?e basis of these comments. The to the general effect that the unit costs a higher rate of return, the carriers con­ tend that the Board has ignored the risks hereto &re S6^ *n the appendixes recognized by the Board in EDR-79 for other carriers are too low. Continental inherent in MATS operations or has as­ of iteans 9aribbean presents a correctior focuses on the absence of overhaul re­ sumed that such operations are free from risk, and that the military discount tan w f 1?tenance c°sts and, in addition serve accruals by Northwest, Pan Amer­ lk i^at an upward adjustment o: ican, TWA, and Trans Caribbean.10 The should not be increased by application is Z °Jecie(i bight and cabin crew cost fact that the three major route carriers of a lower rate of return than is .recog­ h fc w 011^ . since those costs tend to b do not maintain overhaul reserves does nized for commercial operations. Contrary to the carriers’ contentions, than ilP+u r.evenue mile in M ATS servio not demonstrate that their reported tiorio mJSreir form al commercial opera maintenance coste are unrepresentatively the Board has not ignored the risks of Port adjusted crew cost data pur low in the base period. On the contrary, MATS operations. The rate of return in Mato kased upon actual experienc it is probable that the incidence of air­ was raised from 8 to 9 percent a year ago in recognition od^the risks related to the and nrii, * n atio n s. The correction craft overhaul work and expense is ex­ attainment of economical aircraft utili­ ate ariri oStments appear to be appropri perienced continuously and no reserve is Airlift-3,1? ^bected in our revised costs required. Moreover, the existence-of a zation under MATS contracts. Even proper reserve should not increase or though risk is recognized as a factor in hmitim ? &teS that the Board erred ii MATS procurement, it is not equivalent revenue •? passenger service cost pe to the risk associated with commercial that sn k 6 to experience, and claim 9 To the extent that conversion costs are in­ tion tnt .cas^s were computed in rela volved specifically in connection with MATS convertible or mixed charters, our approach 11 Tiger cites Northwest's and T W A ’s fuel rather revenue Plane-miles flow: in EDR-79 recognized them. We adhere to costs, T W A ’s maintenance cost, and World’s service those bown in passenge that approach herein. crew costs. aDDrnnvi i e c°ntention is correct an 10 a s earlier noted, TCA’s costs were in error 12 Airlift, Northwest, Seaboard, Slick, Trans PPropnate adjustment is made. Air in this respect and are corrected herein. International, Trans World, and World. 3866 RULES AND REGULATIONS operations, and therefore a lower rate of payment of cash expenses by the car­ a fair and reasonable rate should not be return is appropriate. In MATS charter riers. Regardless of the payment lag, based upon either the highest- or lowest- services the carriers are assured of a full however, if actual working capital were eost carrier. W e found that passenger planeload of traffic for each flight. By used, less than one month’s operating costs ranged from 1.90 to 2.41 cents per the same token the carriers’ revenues are expenses would be included in the invest­ passenger-mile and that averages com­ predetermined for each flight and are ment bape. Although several carriers puted on various bases centered around not subject to variations normally ex­ report more than 1 month’s cash operat­ 2.18 cents. W e concluded, however, to perienced in commercial 'operations. ing expenses as working capital, the, round that indicated average cost to a Similarly, the MATS contractors have working capital of a number of others rate of 2.20 cents per passenger-mile on the protection of the minimum rates does not cover one month’s operating ex­ the basis of a review of the individual established by the Board, and the risk penses. Indeed, the working capital of costs of each carrier. We believed that of competitive rate cutting is not present several carriers, including two of the such rate would come closest to meeting in MATS charter service. Finally, it is three commenting on the Board’s pro­ the needs of the individual carriers. As noted that the MATS contractors have posal, is negative. The actual working regards the cargo services, we selected a achieved generally reasonable earnings capital of the carriers in the aggregate rate of 9.0 cents per ton-mile on the and a substantial degree of financial sta­ is less than the amount allowed by the basis of the average cost of the entire bility in recent years reflecting, among notice. On balance, we conclude that group of M A T S contractors. other things, the Board’s supervision of the allowance of 1 month’s cash operat­ D O D , in its comments, urges the Board the applicable minimum rates. W e con­ ing expenses as working capital is fair to determine the passenger charter rate clude that the previously adopted 9-per­ and reasonable. without reference to the costs of such cent rate provides an adequate return Two carriers request that certain items service with CL-44 aircraft. DOD states for performance of M A T S services. eliminated be restored to the investment that its objective is to transport passen­ Investment base. The provision of base. TWA mentions equipment pur­ gers on pure jet aircraft and to use working capital on the basis of one chase funds, construction work in prog­ CL-44 aircraft for cargo services. It is month’s cash operating expenses has ress, long-term prepayments, and invest­ stated that the CL-44 aircraft will be also been used in past MATS rate re­ ment in special funds; and Airlift claims used in passenger service only when jet views. In the notice, we also noted that that insurance deposit premiums for pas­ equipment is not available or in con­ the 1-month basis recognized the fact senger liability should be recognized in nection with conversions of one-way that contractors are generally able to investment. The insurance prepay­ cargo flights. Therefore, it is expected obtain settlement of their accounts with ments are covered by the allowance for that the use of the CL-44 in pure pas­ MATS within one month. Three carriers working capital. As to the items men­ senger service will be very limited. disputed this statement, presented data tioned by TWA, there is no showing that The revisions to the cost data set forth showing that an average of more than these funds are related to MATS opera­ in EDR-79 which we are effecting herein 30 days is required to obtain payment tions. raise the individual carrier data in vary­ from MATS, and contended that Working ing amounts and the various averages of Rate levels— Round-trip passenger and capital snould be based on actual ex­ passenger costs by 0.03 to 0.04 cents. perience rather than unsupported as­ cargo rates. The following table shows Thus, the overall simple and weighted sumptions.13 the total cost of service for round-trip (by aircraft committed) averages of 2.18 The fact that the carriers may not be passenger and cargo services developed cents, on the basis of the original data, paid within one month of performance in EDR-79 and as revised herein. The become 2.22 cents and 2.21 cents, respec­ must be balanced against the considera­ details of those revisions are set forth tively. Taking the jet aircraft separ­ tion that there is a significant lag in the in the appendixes. ately, the simple average of the group’s costs rises from 2.16 cents to 2.20 cents. Passenger services cost Cargo services cost On a weighted basis, the original average per passenger-mile per ton-mile of 2.13 cents becomes 2.17 cents. In con­ sidering the passenger rate proposed by EDR-79 Revised EDR-79 Revised EDR-79, the Board tested the average cost of a more limited group of carriers, Jet services: . Cents . Cents Cents Cents i.e., those carriers which in the last 6 2.29 2.29 months o f 1964 were the predominant Airlift...... 2.12 2.19 8.5 8.6 Continental______2.31 2.31 9.1 9.8 M A T S passenger carriers. Weighted by Northwest______2.09 2.22 8.1 8.7 traffic carried, that group’s average cost Pan American...... - 2.20 2.20 9.5 3.5 Seaboard...... - 2.32 2.37 8.9 9.1 was 2.13 cents originally and is now 2.17 Trans Caribbean______1.99 . 2.16 8.0 8.6 cents per passenger-mile. However, u TWA ...... -...... —______1.90 1.94 7.1 the high and low unit costs are omitjea Capítol------2.30 2.30 8.9 9.1 Trans International______-...... -___ 2.17 2.17 8.6 8.6 from the group, the original frame- World...... 2.10 2.10 8.5 8.5 weighted average was 2.17 cents and as Averages: revised is 2.22 cents. Simple______-...... -______2.16 2.20 8.5 8.9 On the basis of the foregoing data tor Weighted1_____ ...... 2.13 2.17 8.6 9.1 both the jet and turboprop aircraft, tne Turboprop services: Board might be justified in prescribing Flying Tiger...... -______2.31 2.31 9.9 9.9 a rate of 2.22 cents, which is slightly Seaboard______-.-______--. ______2.41 2.41 10.4 10.4 Slick...... -______2.02 2.05 8.4 8.6 above the rate originally Pr°Pfse“; However, in the light of DOD’s assertio Averages: Simple--.------2.25 2.26 9.6 9.6 regarding the use of the CL-44 airc Weighted 1______-...... -...... 2.29 2.30 9.8 9^8 in passenger service in fiscal year Overall average: ■ when these rates will be in ,e®fc,’ the Simple______-...... 2.18 2.22 8.8 9.1 appropriate to give less weight Weighted1------2.18 2.21 9.0 9.4 CL-44 costs and greater weight i Individual carrier cost weighted by number of aircraft committed to MATS. jet costs. On this basis, we ile rate of 2.20 cents per P f s^ f “ d. In proposing to establish a round-trip for each carrier as well as averages for would be fair and reasonable for r passenger charter rate of 2.2 cents per the jet operators, the turboprop opera­ trip passenger services. ^-aTS passenger-mile and a round-trip cargo tors, and the entire group of carriers W ith respect to the c o s f ^ . ^ computed on various bases. The Board charter rate Of 9.0 cents per ton-mile, cargo services, Continental ly the Board reviewed the unit cost shown noted that no single uniform rate could exactly meet each carrier’s costs of op­ contend that the Board upon the costs of operating P 13 Airlift, Seaboard, and Slick. eration including a fair profit and that

\ Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3867 charters,11 adjusted only to exclude pas­ basic rates18 is the corollary to the car­ rates should be increased by 0.25 cent senger service costs, since various other riers’ contention that the cost savings we and 0.50 cent, respectively, for applica­ categories of cost are greater per mile have attributed to the backhaul portion tion to cargo charter flights operated via flown in cargo service. Slick asserts that, of one-way MATS charters are reflected the North Pacific. among other things, aircraft utilization in basic costs and rates. Both the car­ One-w ay passenger and cargo rates. tends to be lower in cargo than in pas­ riers and DOD are correct in their con- . The minimum rates proposed by EDR- senger service and this factor increases tentions, but it does not follow that no 79 for MATS one-way passenger and unit costs. Only three carriers submitted adjustments at all should be made. The; cargo charter flights, 3.75 cents per forecasts showing higher unit costs, ex­ carrier cost data upon which the Board passenger-mile and 15.80 cents per ton- clusive of passenger service costs, for determines the basic passenger and cargo mile, respectively, were based on the cargo as compared with passenger char­ rates include a wide range of carriers, minimum rates for round-trip services. ters, and the differences shown are not types of service, and areas of operation. In essence, the round-trip rates were great. In any event, however, we have While some carriers operate principally doubled, since the M A T S traffic is car­ modified the data set forth in the notice round trip passenger charters, others ried only in one direction on these with respect to cargo services to reflect concentrate on one-way cargo flights, flights. The resulting rate was then ad­ the forecasts submitted insofar as they and still others operate various combina­ justed downward to reflect certain cost set forth cost levels peculiar to cargo tions of passenger and cargo service. A l­ savings on the empty return portion and charter flights. W e have also omitted though the individual carrier as well as to reflect that 10 percent of such return the cost of TWA, since that carrier does group average cost data reflect the costs legs would be put to other revenue usage. not perform cargo charters. peculiar to the particular kinds of op­ The cost savings on the return segment The modifications made herein to the eration conducted, neither the Form 41 of one-way passenger charters was esti­ original data raise the various group reports nor the special cost data sub­ mated to be 21 percent of total costs; averages 0.3 to 0.5 cent per ton-mile. On mitted in connection with this proceed­ on cargo returns, 15 percent was esti­ the revised basis, the turbojet aircraft ing are such as to permit any precise mated. average is about 9 cents per ton-mile, identification of these cost differences. The six carriers that commented gen­ while the CL-44 simple average is 9.6 On an industry average basis, however, erally contended that the indicated cost cents, and on a weighted (by aircraft) we are satisfied tliat the impact is very savings on the return portion were ex­ basis it is 9.8 cents. The overall simple minor. cessive, that no savings would be realized average for the group is 9.1 cents; It is clear, however, that the incidence in the fixed categories of cost, and that, weighted by aircraft committed, the on individual carriers must be quite dif­ in any event, the experienced costs of overall average is 9.4 cents. It is ap­ ferent! either greater or lesser, than the the carriers operating one-way MATS propriate, we believe, to give extra weight impact on industry average costs. charters already reflected such savings to the CL-44 costs in determining the Stated differently, the carrier which per­ as might be achieved. One of the car­ minimum cargo rate, since the CL-44 forms principally convertible or mixed riers also»stated that it would be unreal­ currently carries over h alf the cargo flights would, other things equal, tend istic to assume that 10 percent of the traffic, and, based on our understanding to suffer a much greater cost impact backhauls would be used in other reve­ of DOD comments herein, should carry than is reflected in the average cost for nue service. a larger share next fiscal year as its par­ the entire group. The reverse would The assertion made by several carriers ticipation in passenger charters is re­ be true with respect to an operation con­ that the Board overstated the cost sav­ duced. Accordingly, we conclude that a sisting of mostly one-way flights. In ings on the backhaul segment of one-way rate of 9.5 cents per ton-mile is fair and establishing uniform rates for industry flights appears to be valid. It is likely reasonable for round-trip cargo services. application, the Board normally con­ that such savings would be limited to the North Pacific rates. In EDR-79, the siders not only industry average costs crew, fuel, and maintenance categories17 Board provided for a slightly higher rate but insofar as possible gives weight to rather than, as assumed by the Board in Per ton-mile for cargo charters operated the individual carrier costs as well. its notice, cut across all categories of na North Pacific routings. The North While we recognize the infirmities of the direct and indirect costs. Such costs Pacific differential is currently 0.5 cent basic cost data, which may be capable of represent about one-third of total costs Per ton-mile round trip and 1.00 cent improvement in future proceedings, we including the return element. Accord­ lfil Tllis Pattern had been, estab­ do not accept the proposition that each ingly, in determining the one-way rates, lished in earlier proceedings, and the of the rates making up the overall we shall apply a 5-percent cost-saving ward found that the data submitted in structure should equate to the overall factor rather the 15-percent factor used i mstant case tended to support m ain- average costs. On the contrary we be­ in the notice. In connection with pas­ enance of that spread. TDOD opposes lieve that the most reasonable rates and senger services, we will adhere to the hhnuance of that differential. structure will be produced if we make additional 6-percent factor used in the n 7? ' intends that such differential is such adjustments as appear proper to notice. In addition, we will adhere to justified by actual cost data, that the the rates for those services which appear the assumption that 10 percent of the thpRa type earlier relied on by to entail significant additional costs or backhaul flights will be put to other anri 3“ ? sllow no significant difference, cost savings. revenue use. ‘ V nat’ 111 any event, such additional Specifically, with respect to the On the basis of the foregoing and the sts as may be incurred from North P a ­ charter services operated via the North basic round-trip passenger and cargo th* °pfra,tions are already reflected in Pacific, data currently available indicate rates, we determine the one-way passen­ min* avera§es relied upon to deter- that the cost spread relied on in ER- ger charter rate to be 3.96 cents per pas­ “hne the basic rate. 414,16 about 31 cents per CL-44 plane senger-mile and the one-way cargo mile, has been cut in half. Moreover, Pa*!« are not Persuaded that the North charter rate to be 17.63 cents per ton- Flying Tiger submitted a breakout of its di**% *$]£& we can see no valid basis for attributing the Iwo Jima, Korea, Viet-Nam, and Thai­ return to a second U.S. P°inJ’/ return entire cost thereof to only one leg of the trip. Moreover, while it is not entirely clear what land, were omitted inadvertently and are to a foreign or overseas DOD contends the rate for a “modified” con­ added to § 288.7(a) (2) by the present to point of origin. The ^ vertible trip should be, such rate should not amendments. times required atthethiee by be devoid of any provision for aircraft con­ Alaska Airlines has also requested that points may exceed the time per version, since the aircraft may well have 1288.7(0. K JO -eeu gge^«^» flights to or from Alaska be added to the required full conversion before the trip pear to provide more started or, at a minimum, stowage of the pas­ areas to which the minimum rates in M A T S and to save the earners senger equipment. § 288.7(a) (2) apply. In support of this Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3869 of some positioning and ferry flights. Subpart A— General of Defense: Provided, That, in the case of We will therefore adopt D O D ’s proposal short-notice MATS charter service, the § 288.1 Definitions. and so amend § 288.7 (c ). However, since award contains or is accompanied by a this amendment was not proposed in the As used in this part : written statement of the military estab­ notice, we will consider timely filed pe­ * “Act” means the Federal Aviation Act lishment that such award is for trans­ titions for reconsideration. of 1958, as amended. portation necessary to fulfill unforeseen Legal authority. United Air Lines re­ “Air carrier” means a citizen of the military requirements as to which time peats the contention it has raised in pre­ United States holding economic operat­ is of the essence. vious MATS rate reviews that, since the ing authority to engage in air trans­ Subpart B— Exemption, Conditions, Board lacks authority to set rates in for­ portation as a direct air carrier with eign air transportation, it may not le­ large aircraft, other than the authority and Requirements gally establish minimum rates for such conferred by this part. § 288.5 Exemption. transportation in Part 288. As we have “Large aircraft” means an aircraft of (a) Subject to the provisions of this stated previously, the contention is un­ more than 12,500 pounds certificated part and the conditions imposed, air car­ sound. Attaching reasonable minimum- maximum take-off weight. riers holding authority from the Board to rate conditions to exemptions from cer­ “MATS” means the Military Air engage in air transportation of persons tain regulatory provisions of the Act and Transport Service. and/or property by the use of large air­ to the authority of the supplemental car­ “North Pacific routing” means a route craft and which have contractually com­ riers to perform charter services fo r the between a point in the 48 contiguous mitted their CRAF aircraft to the De­ Department of Defense is not the same States and Japan via Alaska. partment of Defense are hereby exempt­ as setting rates. The Board has found “Short-notice MATS charter service” ed from the following provisions of Title that the minimum-rate conditions are means foreign and overseas air trans­ IV of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, required in order to prevent destructive portation, and air transportation be­ as amended, and the Board’s Economic competition in M ATS charter operations tween the 48 contiguous States on the Regulations: Section 403 of the Act; Part and that they are reasonable conditions one hand and the State of Hawaii s>r 221 of the regulations. upon the authority to perform military Alaska on the other hand, in planeload charters granted by Part 288 exemptions lots of persons and/or property pursuant (b) Subject to the provisions of this and by the supplémentais’ certificates. to civil augmentation contracts with part and the conditions Imposed, air Reissùance. Since Part 288 has been MATS whereunder the first flight under carriers, other than supplemental air amended seven times since its reissuance an award occurs not more than 3 weeks carriers, holding authority from the in August 1962, the Board will at this after the date established-by MATS for Board to engage in air transportation of time reissue it to incorporate all amend­ the submission of proposals by the air persons and/or property by the use of ments, including those effected in this carriers and all flights are to be per­ large aircraft and which have contrac­ proceeding. formed within 30 days of the first flight: tually committed their CRAF aircraft to Pursuant to § 302.38(d), express pro­ Provided, That MATS traffic only is car­ the Department of Defense, are hereby vision is hereby made for the filing of ried on such flights. exempted from the following provisions petitions for reconsideration with re­ “Substitute service” means the per­ of Title TV of the Federal Aviation Act spect to piston charters to or from formance by an air carrier of foreign or of 1958, as amended, and the Board’s Alaska and with respect to the revised overseas air transportation, or air trans­ Economic Regulations: • Section 401(a) definition of round-trip services. Peti­ portation between the 48 contiguous of the Act; Part 202 of the regulations; tions for reconsideration and answers States, on the one hand, and the State Part 207 of the regulations. thereto shall be governed by the provi­ of Alaska or Hawaii, on the other hand, § 288.6 Scope of exemption. sions of § 302.37. Petitions for recon­ in planeload lots pursuant to an agree­ The exemptions granted in § 288.5 ex­ sideration and answers shall be served ment with another air carrier to fulfill tend only to transportation of persons upon the Department of Defense and such other air carrier’s contractual obli­ and/or property under agreements for upon other carriers who have filed com­ gation to perform such air transporta­ short-notice M ATS charter service as de­ ments in this proceeding.. tion for MATS and when the perform­ fined herein, where the award contains, riîüi cAonsi(teration of the foregoing, the ance of such air transportation is not to or is accompanied by, the written state­ Aeronautics Board hereby amends take place during a period longer than 3 ment set forth in the proviso to § 288.2, and reissues Part 288 of the Economic weeks. and to substitute service as defined here­ regulations (14 C FR Part 288), effective “Supplemental air carrier” means an in. This authority is in addition to all July 1, 1965, as set forth below. air carrier deriving its operating author­ other authority to engage in air transpor­ ity from either an interim certificate or Subpart A— General tation issued by the Board to any air interim authority issued pursuant to sec­ &6C carrier and will not be construed as in tion 7 of Public Law 87-528 or a certifi­ any manner limiting such other 2882 ?eflnitions- cate of public convenience and necessity ^88-2 Applicability. authority. for supplemental air transportation is­ Subpart B— Exemption, Conditior sued pursuant to section 401(d)(3) of § 288.7 Reasonable level of compensa­ Requirements the Act. tion. f t Exemption. It shall be a condition on the exemp­ All terms defined in the Act and not 288 7 I 009® of exemPtion. otherwise defined in this part are used tions granted by this part that the level 288 8 Reasonable level of com pel of compensation for transportation pro­ Application for other relief in the sense of their statutory definitions. vided for short-notice MATS charter Subpart C— Enforcement § 288.2 Applicability. service and substitute service shall not Violations. be uneconomically low. This part applies to substitute service (a ) Minimum charges. In the absence Subpart D— Duration and short-notice MATS charter service by air carriers holding economic au­ of specific Board approval, the compensa­ 8818 Expiration. thority from the Board to provide air tion for such services shall pot be less than the following: provisions of this Par transportation of persons and/or prop­ (1) For services other than those spec­ tion Act ri* secs- 204> 416> Federal Avia erty by the use of large aircraft and 1324,1386 f 1958’ 72 Stat> 743> 771; 49 T7.S.C which have contractually committed ified in subparagraphs (2) and (3) of their CRAF aircraft to the Department this paragraph: 3870 RULES AND REGULATIONS

less than 90 percent of the above mini­ Turbine aircraft Piston aircraft m um loads. For purposes of this pro­ Type ot service viso, failure by the carrier to accommo­ Regular Rates for Regular Rates for rates North Pacific rates North Pacific date more than 12 loaded pallets on the routing routing B-707—320B/C and DC-8F aircraft, or 10 loaded pallets on the CL-44 aircraft,‘ir­ Passenger services, per passenger-mile: Cents Cents Cents Cents respective of the total weight thereof, on ■Round trip__ ...... 2.20 2.20 2.55 2.55 the all-cargo segment of any convertible 3.96 3.96 4.20 4.20 Cargo services, per ton-mile: charter flight, due to the presence of Round trip...... 9.50 9.75 10.50 11.00 galley equipment and/or crew facilities 17.63 18.13 19.00 20.00 Convertible services: on the main deck of the aircraft for use Passenger leg, per passenger-mile—...... 2.35 2.35 on that convertible charter flight, is Cargo leg, per ton-mile______11.00 11.25 deemed to be due to the bulk of the cargo Both legs, per passenger-mile______2.55 2.55 Mixed passenger-cargo services: supplied by MATS. One way, per passenger-mile______4.20 4.20 (c) Round-trip services defined. For Round trip, per passenger-mile______2.55 2.55 purposes of this section, round-trip serv­ Round trip, per Revenue plane-mile, for following number of passengers and pallets: ices means short-notice MATS charter 165 and 0______$3.88 $3.88 service where (1) passengers and/or 117 and 3...... 3.83 3.85 105 and 4______3.82 3.85 cargo are transported on two or more 93 and 5...... 3.80 3.84 successive revenue flights and the last 81 and 6 - - _ ...... 3.79 3.83 63 and 7______3.77 3.82 revenue flight terminates within 250 stat­ 51 and 8______3.76 3.82 ute miles of the point of origin of the 0 and 12— ...... 3.71 3.79 first revenue flight or, by mutual consent of M A T S and the carrier, jat a point with­ Provided, That, subject to the provisions Provided, That, subject to the provisions in 250 statute miles of the carrier’s of paragraph (b ) of this section, the of paragraph (b ) of this section, the minimum rates specified above shall not principal operating base; (2) the sched­ be applicable to the passehgers or cargo minimum rates specified in this subpara­ uling permits departure within' 4 hours carried on a particular trip in excess of graph shall not be applicable to pas­ after arrival at each point to be served the amount that the contract calls for sengers or cargo carried on a particular except at one point where the aircraft MATS to supply and the carrier to pro­ trip in excess of the amount that the con­ may be scheduled for departure within vide space. tract calls for MATS to supply and the 72 hours after arrival; Provided, That, (2) For services other than those spec­ carrier to provide space. on flights serving more than one U.S. ified in subparagraph (3) of this para­ (3) The compensation for substitutedeparture point, by mutual consent, graph, within Alaska; between Hawaii, M ATS and the carrier may agree on not Midway, Johnston, Kwajalein, or Eniwe- service shall not be less than that which more than three points where the air­ tok; between Japan, Guam, Okinawa, the prime contractor would have received craft may be scheduled for departure Formosa, the .Philippines, Iwo Jima, under his contract with MATS. within 72 hours after arrival; and (3) Korea, Viet-Nam, or Thailand; or to or

Schedule A—T ranspacific R outings On January 26,1965, by notice of pro­ posed rule making EDR-79/PSDR-10 And (30 F.R. 998), the Board proposed cer­ tain amendments to Parts 288 and 399 Between South Philip­ of its regulations (Docket 15808). W ith Thailand Viêt- pine Guam Wake Hawaii Formosa Okinawa Japan Alaska respect to Part 399, the notice proposed Nam. Islands policy statements setting forth ( 1) mini­ mum rate conditions for exemptions for Ü.S. west coast1.-..- 8 or 5 8 or 5 7 or 4 7 6 1 14 or 4 7 or 4 7 or 2 1 15 15 3 3 3 1 Logair and Quicktrans domestic charters 12 12 1 1 1 9 1 1 and Category A and Z individually tick­ 12 12 i 1 1 9 1 12 12 1 1 11 10 eted or waybilled services, ancL(2) Board 13 13 9 9 1 policy with respect to tariffs for Category 12 12 1 1 A and Z passenger and Category A cargo 12 12 1 Philippine Islands- _ 1 1 services. South Viet-Nam___ 1 Written data, views, and arguments have been filed in response to the notice. Routings In addition, the staff has held informal 1. Direct. 9. Via Wake. conferences at which interested persons 2. Via Anchorage. 10. Via Wake—Guam. were afforded an opportunity to present 3. Via Tachikawa. 11. Via Guam. their views orally. All written and oral 4. Via Anchorage—Tachikawa. 12. Via Clark. 5. Via Anchorage—Tachikawa—Clark. 13. Via Wake—Clark. comments and supporting statements 6. Via Honolulu. 14. Via Honolulu—Wake—Guam. before the Board have been carefully 7; Via Honolulu—Wake. 15. Via Tachikawa—Clark. 8. Via Honolulu—Wake—Clark. considered, and all contentions not otherwise disposed of hereinafter are re­ Note: Alternative routings 7, 8, and 14 are to be used for calculation of the mileage if MATS requires that an intermediate point along the mid-Pacific route be served. jected. Final amendments to Part 288, Exemption of Air Carriers for Short- 1 Any place in the States of California, Oregon, or Washington. Notice Military Contracts and Substitute (3) Transatlantic services. In the granted by the Board prior to the time Service, are being adopted concurrently case of transatlantic services, when the such operations are undertaken, or non- herewith (ER-432). nonstop airport-to-airport distance be­ compliance with any applicable require­ Category A and Z traffic— Rates tween origin and destination of the flight ments, conditions or limitations in this adopted. In PSDR-10, the Board pro­ is 4,000 miles or more and no intermedi­ part constitute violations of the Federal posed to publish a policy statement set­ ate points are specified by the terms of Aviation Act of 1958 and will render the ting forth the minimum rates deemed the MATS contract, the mileage shall be offending air carrier subject to imposi­ economical for transportation of mili­ no less than as computed via Shannon, tion of lawful sanction, including in tary passengers and cargo on scheduled Ireland, or via Lajes/Santa Maria, proper cases criminal prosecution under flights. On the basis of the considera­ Azores, whichever routing yields a lower section 902(a) of the Act. tions set forth in the explanatory state­ mileage. ment accompanying that proposal, we (e) On-loading and off-loading of Subpart D— Duration proposed that the minimum Category A traffic. It shall not be deemed a viola­ § 288.18 Expiration. and Z passenger fares be 3,75 cents per tion of the provisions of this section for passenger-mile. Such rate is equal to the (a) This part shall expire June 30, an air carrier operating a charter flight minimum rate proposed for one-way 1967, unless,rescinded by- the Board at to permit MATS to on-load and/or off­ MATS charter flights and continued the an earlier date. The Board reserves the load traffic (passenger or cargo) at any same relationship between the rates for right to rescind this part or any provi­ operational stops en route made for the the two basic services that has hereto­ sion thereof at any time, with or with­ carrier’s convenience, to the extent that fore existed. The 3.75-cent rate would out notice or hearing, as the public in­ 1 ™es not interfere with the carrier’s represent a reduction of 10.17 percent terest may require. ' scheduled ground operation: Provided, from the existing Category A and Z rates (b ) The transportation services per­ ihat the carrier receives minimum com- of 4.2 cents in most areas. formed pursuant to the authorization Pensation consistent with the provisions For Category A cargo, the Board pro­ granted in this part do not constitute i this section for resulting load carried posed a dual rate structure in which dif­ an activity of a continuing nature within ?,?'ny flight stage which is in excess ferent rates would apply depending on the meaning of section 9(b) of the Ad­ the load paid for under the contract. the amount of traffic tendered for a ministrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. flight. Accordingly, for a maximum of 8 288.8 Application for other relief. 1008(b). four pallets per flight, outbound rates Akcarriers may make timely applica­ By the Civil Aeronautics Board. from the commercial gateway (e.g., New n t ?r authority to engage in air trans- [ s e a l] H arold R . S a n d e r so n , York, San Francisco) would be based on tatwn for the military establishment Secretary. 12 cents per ton-mile. Inbound rates fmmC0Vered ky this part, including relief [F.R. D o c. 65-2930; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; would be based on 10 cents per ton-mile. _ limitation or requirement im - 8 :4 5 a.m .] However, when more than four pallets .u ?. ky this part. Such applications are carried per flight, the MATS one­ t a in t governed by the provisions con- SUBCHAPTER F— POLICY STATEMENTS way charter minimum rate (i.e., 16.8 cents per ton-mile for North Pacific serv­ £ S àp t5 rt302>SubpartsAandDoi [Reg. PS-26] ices and 15.8 cents for all other services) Subpart C— Enforcement PART 399— STATEMENTS OF would apply to those pallets in excess of §288.15 Vi„lations, GENERAL POLICY four. For air and truck pickup of this traffic at military bases, appropriate add­ ky any carrier for the mil Military Exemptions and Tariff Rates ons to the basic rates were also proposed. the scnnat,1^Shment which are not with Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics The following table summarizes the or of ?^.ofsuch carrier’s basic authori Board at its office in Washington, D.C., current rate levels, the rates proposed, ls Part or of other authori on the 17th day of M arch 1965. and the rates adopted herein: 3872 RULES AND REGULATIONS

cents), but clearly the advantages to Current Proposed Adopted rate rate raté M A T S of individually ticketed transpor­ tation on scheduled flights without the necessity of scheduling a return pas­ Category A and Z passengers, per passenger-mile: Cents Cents Cents Economy (Second) class______4.20 3.75 3.75 senger for each outbound passenger or Third class..______... 3.29 3.29 assembling full planeloads make the Category A cargo, per ton-mile: One to four pallets: Category A service a far more valuable Outbound...... /H4.00 12.00 12.00 one than Category B and warrant a Inbound...... 12.00 10.00 10.00 Additional paUets: higher rate. On the other side, TWA Outbound...... 14.00 15.80 17.63 proposes that the Category A rate be set North Pacific______. 14.00 16.80 17.63 somewhat above the one-way minimum Inbound...... 12.00 15.80 17.63 North Pacific...... 12.00 16.80 17.63 charter rate, citing allegedly greater Additional charges for cargo: costs and value of service. However, the Air pickup: McGuire AFB...... 4.00 2.00 2.00 one-way charter rate reflects the fact Dover AFB______5.00 3.00 3.00 that the traffic moves only in one direc­ Travis AFB...... 3.00 2.00 2.00 Truck pickup: tion and the necessity that the full costs McGuire AFB...... lo o 1.00 1.00 of such service must be covered by the Dover AFB...... 1.00 1.00 2.00 one-way rate. The Category A and Z Travis AFB...... 1.00 1.00 1.00 passenger traffic is not as directional in nature, and it appears to be more appro­ Three carriers, Northwest Airlines, a kind , of promotional device to attract priate to approach such rates in terms Inc., Seaboard World Airlines, Inc., and military traffic that would not move at of normal round-trip fares rather than Trans World Airlines, Inc., as well as normal air fares and rates. It seems ob­ the special one-way M ATS charter rates. as the Department of Defense, com­ vious that sound economics require that W e are fully aware that we are depart­ mented in general with respect to the such traffic not be permitted to displace ing from the passenger-fare structure proposed Category A and Z rates and the normal-fare traffic to any significant that has prevailed for several years. considerations relied on by the Board. degree and that additional schedules not From the inception of our regulation of Seaboard apparently opposes any reduc­ be added solely to accommodate such the M A T S charter rates, the one-way tion in the existing Category A cargo traffic. On the other hand, it is clear passenger charter rate has been set at rates and contends that many of the con­ that the carriage of reasonable volumes the level of the Category A and Z rate so siderations relied on by the Board are of this traffic on a basis that increases as to place each service on an equal foot­ erroneous. Northwest urges that the load factors and does not replace nor­ ing in terms of price. We believed that cargo rates be increased so as to equal mal-rated traffic should increase carrier the desirability of such result outweighed the minimum rate for one-way MATS revenues and earnings. On the basis of the fact that the resulting one-way char­ cargo charters. TW A does not object to the Board’s review and understanding of ter rate was moderately below indicated a more limited reduction in the Category the contractual provisions relating to full cost. In the evolution of these serv­ A and Z passenger fares than the Board Category A traffic, the carriers have very ices, however, the one-way passenger proposed but contends that such rates substantial ability to control how much charter flight has become comparatively as well as the Category A cargo rates of this traffic is carried and on what rare, while the volume of Category A and should be set somewhat above the one­ flights. Z services has become very important. way charter minimums on cost and In these circumstances, then, the The fact of the matter is that there are value-of-service considerations. DOD, Board sees no basic objection to the no longer any significant competitive im­ on the other hand, urges that the Cate­ establishment of Category A, and Z rates plications between these two services gory A passenger rates be equated to the at levels below fully allocated costs, as which would require rate equality. More­ round-trip charter minimum. has been the case for an extended period. over, the resulting passenger-fare struc­ In varying respects, the carriers argue Clearly, however, the precise level se­ ture would be more similar in this regar that the Board erred in assuming that lected is a matter of judgment on which to the M A T S cargo rate structure whicn Category A and Z passenger and cargo the respondents in this matter differ, in has obtained for several years. traffic is in fact carried in space which that some propose higher and some pro­ W hile the exact level of the Category would otherwise be unused, and in con­ pose lower rates than those set forth by A and Z fares is a matter of judgment, cluding that this traffic should be priced the Board. we adhere to our earlier finding tha on that basis. It is stated that carrier So fa r as Category A and Z 1 passenger reduction in the current level is war­ flexibility is limited because Category A rates are concerned, we have determined ranted on the basis of recent trends passenger reservations are changed on to adopt the rate of 3.75 cents per pas­ carrier costs and other rates.and • short notice and the transportation re­ senger-mile as proposed, notwithstanding The round-trip passenger charter ra quirements set forth in the service orders the fact that we have decided to estab­ adopted in ER^432 reflects a reduction oi issued in advance of each month do not lish a somewhat higher rate for one-way over 13 percent. The cargo, convertible, bear any close resemblance to the traffic passenger charters in ER-432. DOD and mixed charter rates are also actually carried. Category A passenger contends that the rate should equal the significantly reduced, although to . traffic shows seasonal peaks and valleys round-trip minimum charter rate 2 ( 2.2 extent. W ere we to continue to equ that tend to coincide with those of com­ the Category A and Z passenger mercial traffic. One carrier states that 1DOD urges the Board to dissociate Cate­ the one-way passenger charter rate> it does not schedule aircraft with space gory A from Category Z passengers and not to resulting reduction would be only ..ne aboard which would be unused but for establish a Category Z rate in this proceeding. cent, which is substantially out d the Category A traffic and that such traf­ While DOD sets forth various respects in with the other reductions adwted. ^ which these traffic categories differ from a the other hand, the Proposed Category fic should pay its own way. procurement and contractual standpoint, we There can be no serious contention are unable to conclude that there is any and Z rate of 3.75 cents reflects a ^ 1^ that the current Category A and Z rates significant difference between them from a percent reduction from the curr the cover fully allocated average costs of transportation standpoint. Accordingly* it which is more closely in hne „ 432. either the passenger or cargo services. appears reasonable to incorporate the Cate­ other rate reductions effected in ER-^ Neither is the Board aware that the car­ gory Z rates into this proceeding for con­ riers have generally urged over the years sideration along with Category A. 2 DOD states that it would agree to a limita­ that the rates for Category A and Z traf­ tion of Category A transportation to flights ie comparatively small redg t0 be fic should closely approximate average for which MATS had issued service orders ray passenger charter rate aPP^ent rate costs of service on a fully allocated basis. substantially in advance of the flight. It is ted by the fact that the the not clear how such restriction differs in sub­ et moderately below fu l cost For several years these rates have been of com petitive considerations. established by the carriers at levels well stance from the provisions currently in force or that it would cause the Category A trans­ we stated in the notin e ,M j n and z » isolate the costs of Catego y ^ oi below both average cost of service and portation to be sufficiently similar to round- prevailing rates for normal commercial trip passenger charters to warrant the same traffic. These rates have been viewed as rate. Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAI REGISTER 3873 above fully- allocated- costs per available With respect to the Category A cargo desire to preclude. The sounder course, seat-mile but is somewliat below cost rates, the Board has decided to finalize in our view, would be to establish cargo per passenger-mile reflecting actual load the rates generally as proposed but modi­ frequencies principally on the basis of factors. These relationships appear to fied to reflect the one-way cargo charter commercial cargo requirements and then be appropriate in view of the special minimum rate adopted in ER-432 and to make available a portion of that space characteristics of this traffic. Similarly, effect other minor changes. The princi­ for MATS traffic. The highly direc­ from a value of service standpoint, it is pal controversy centers around provision tional character of the Category A cargo appropriate to price this service below for a lower level of rates for shipments traffic underscores the economic neces­ normal commercial fares but well above not exceeding four pallets. Northwest sity to avoid basing cargo schedules solely the round-trip charter rate.6 opposes any such lower level of rates and or principally on that traffic. Trans Caribbean Airways in its com­ contends that Category A cargo rates DOD and Northwest request clarifica­ ments notes that it currently publishes should be equated to the one-way cargo tion of the four-pallet rule, in situations Category A and Z fares between New charter rate, as has been the case with where five or more pallets are carried, as York and San Juan of $52.75, equivalent Category A and Z passenger rates, irre­ to whether the higher level of rates ap­ to 3.29 cents per passenger-mile. Such spective of the size of the shipment.® plies to all pallets carried or only to those fares apply in TC A ’s thrift or third-class Seaboard apparently believes the higher in excess of four. We intend the latter service, which is a lower class than the level of rates will have little use and that application. The purpose of the dual economy service in which the Category MATS will simply set up its traffic for structure is to safeguard the economics of A and Z fares normally apply.* TCA any one flight in shipments of no more Category A cargo transportation. We points out that a fare based on 3.75 cents than four pallets. The carrier opposes believe that as many as four pallets could per passenger-mile would be above the any reduction in the current Category A reasonably be handled within normal normal one-way thrift-class fare and cargo rates. DOD, on the other hand, cargo capacity without displacing stand­ urges that the existing fare be permitted urges that the four-pallet restriction on ard-rated traffic. Beyond four pallets we to continue. At the revised one-way the applicability of the lower rate level are concerned that such situation would charter rate determined herein, the C at­ be raised to eight pallets, on the theory no longer obtain, and therefore we pre­ egory A and Z rates would be even that a carrier would normally add a cargo scribe a higher or premium rate for such higher. We believe that T C A ’s conten­ schedule if it had a few pallets of com­ excess pallets. The existence of such pre­ tion has merit and will *amend our pro­ mercial traffic and that would leave the mium should offer the shipper an incen­ posed policy statement to provide for a bulk of the flight available for MATS tive to move its traffic wherever possiblé lower fare level (i.e., 3.29 cents) when traffic. in shipments not in excess of four pallets the Category A or Z service is performed Nothing in the comments persuades us rather than bunching large shipments on in a third-class scheduled service. to modify our basic approach in this area. fewer flights. The result should be a TWA in its comments raises a matter We are well aware that the cargo-rate more even and predictable flow of Cate­ to which the Board did not directly ad­ structure differs from the current pas­ gory A traffic, which will in turn enable vert in its notice, namely, rates appli­ senger-rate structure in that a lower the carrier to maximize total traffic and cable to the carriage of inbound (to U.S.) level of rates is permitted for a limited load factor and optimize the overall eco­ passengers under contract optiom pro­ volume of cargo traffic. . W e are also nomics of the operation. By the same visions in stated proportions to C ate­ aware, however, that the Category A pas­ token, such circumstances should re­ gory A cargo carried in the outbound senger- and cargo-rate structures have duce the likelihood of diversion of com­ erection. This passenger traffic is some­ differed in this Respect for several years.® mercial cargo and the necessity to sched­ times called Category X . The Board has W e are not convinced that we should at ule additional frequencies to handle the for several years permitted the round- this time upset the existing structure by Category A cargo. To the extent, how­ tnp passenger charter rate to apply to requiring that the Category A cargo rates ever, that “excess” Category A pallets the passengers involved in recognition be established at the one-way cargo displace normal rated traffic or contrib­ or the round-trip character of the trans­ charter level, thus causing a significant ute to an increase in frequencies, the portation, provided the passengers were increase in current rates, especially since higher rate will better enable that traffic neither of the principal carriers of Cate­ to carry its fair share of costs. But we carried in full planeloads (i.e., charters). gory A cargo appears to desire such re­ see no reason to require that the first such passengers were carried in less sult. As heretofore noted, we believe that four pallets on the flight also be charged an full planeloads, the higher Category Category A cargo can be carried eco­ the premium rate. The Board has no rate would apply. We had occasion nomically at the rates earlier proposed, desire to discourage or preclude the car­ o re^ew and reaffirm that policy within provided that commercial traffic is not riage of Category A cargo. Our concern it ®^"®0hths and find no basis to revise displaced or schedules added solely for it. is to safeguard the economics of such it at this time.7 The four-pallet limitation on any flight services. W e are aware that this rate should afford an adequate safeguard in structure would mean that a full plane­ that respect. To the extent that larger load (13 pallets) would cost less to ship a rMiwiAir Lines hied comments opposing Category A loads are carried, the higher by Category A than Category B ,10 but we between w* ° f the current Category Z rat< rate would apply. do not consider this factor to outweigh and San Jua“ - Delt{ We are not prepared to increase the the other considerations. Moreover, the Z farP R ^ the new level of Category A anc transati^ff determined with reference tc four-pallet limit to eight as suggested by existence of a Category A cargo rate be­ the £ “X and transpacific costs and thai DOD. At eight pallets MATS traffic low the Category B rate, which we con­ ferent in „ ^eans_San Jiuan market is dif- would represent well over half the load tinue to find justified, tends to afford that DPitIa? ° « S respects- including the fac even at a 100-percent load factor. At M ATS some price advantage in using the route. A« . u£fers losses in operating thai lesser load factors, the proportion would scheduled services, whichever way the and z naw Jret° fore noted, the Category I be even greater. In fact, the eight-pallet four-pallet rule is applied to five or more Predicated n,dger rates do not purport to b< load might well be deemed a basis for an pallets. aPparent wh^°n^ « St factors alone. It is noi in the CarThK & dlfferent result should obtaii additional all-cargo frequency even if no W ith respect to Category A cargo rates in the CantJ!an area> While Delta’s servicei additional commercial traffic were avail­ applying inbound to the United States, assume that „ea? may n°t he profitable, w< able, and that is exactly the result we the notice proposed a moderately lower ried W roves "a i l Ca! t gory Z trafflc as is car- level of rates than in the outbound di­ economics .„^ther than impairs the route’s 8 Northwest also urges that we provide for rection in recognition of the fact that suitwoulri^ e,_Would assume the same re an increase in the minimum weight per pallet little or no Category A cargo traffic To the extent aven at the lower rate level from the current level of 4,500 pounds. moves inbound. The lower level of Stances a carrier believes that cir Nothing has been presented, however, to rates would apply up to four pallets; and rantahishpr f uliar t ° a given m arket w ar show that the current minimum weight is a higher level, the same as applicable rates set fn rt*-^ 6’ we would observe that th< not reasonably related to actual weight. «T ca s t a t i c ® 111 are rninimums only, Therefore, we will adhere to the finding set outbound, would apply to pallets in ex- greater seating ^ at lts th rift service has s forth in the notice. pahin service« density and a lower level o 9 As set forth earlier, we are herein modify­ 19 Such disparity would normally tend to ^ T s charter servic**11 economy service an< ing the current passenger-rate structure by be minimized to the extent that MATS uti­ providing for a Category A and Z rate below lized the cargo compartments below the Order E-21465, Oct. 30,1964. the one-way passenger charter rate. main deck on the charter flight. 3874 RULES AND REGULATIONS cess of four. Seaboard contends that On the basis of these data, the Board Legal authority. United Air T.jries the proposed rates will not attract such concludes that the 1-cent-per-pound questions the Board’s authority to set traffic and will only distort the rate rate for truck service from McGuire is minimum Category A and Z rates and structure. Seaboard appears to desire reasonable and that the add-on for fares in a rule-making proceeding. It that existifig inbound rates be left un­ traffic from Dover should be 2 cents per contends that the Board cannot estab­ disturbed. DOD, however, urges that pound. lish rates in foreign air transportation the inbound rate be set even lower and The Board’s notice also proposed with and can establish rates in interstate or be equated to the round-trip cargo char­ respect to the Category A cargo rates overseas air transportation only after ter minimum on the theory that if in­ that one basic rate per ton-mile apply via notice and hearing under section 1002 bound traffic should materialize it would the North Pacific routings and that an­ (d) of the Act. The carrier also appar­ be moved by converting one-way Cate­ other, and lower, rate per ton-mile ap­ ently contends that the notice proposed gory B flights to round trip and there­ ply via the mid-Pacific and all other to bring individually ticketed and way­ fore the Category A rate should be com­ routings. The notice also defined the billed transportation within the scope of petitive with that rate. DOD further bases for the mileages to be used in com­ the charter regulations. urges that there is no need to impose puting point-to-point rates per pound In Docket 15808, the Board undertook the dual structure in the inbound direc­ for tariff purposes,12 by reference to the to review all rates charged for military tion. comparable provisions of Part 288. services, including Part 288 overseas and As earlier noted, the Category A rates These rules would mean, for example, foreign charter rates, Logair and Quick- are primarily aimed at less than plane- - that two rates could be published for trans domestic charter rates, and indi­ load quantities of traffic. To the extent service between Travis and Tokyo de­ vidually ticketed or waybilled Category that M A T S may desire from time to time pending on the routing. On further con­ A and Z fares and rates. The notice did to ship a full planeload of cargo inbound, sideration of the matter, we believe that not propose to encompass either do­ it appears to the Board that the most such structure is unnecessarily compli­ mestic charters or Category A and Z economical way to do it is to convert a cated and would present difficulties ih within the Part 288 regulations govern­ one-way charter flight to a round trip. administration and application for both ing minimum rates for overseas and If, however, such traffic is to be moved the carriers and MATS. While MATS foreign MATS charters. On the con­ on a regularly scheduled flight, exactly would have a legitimate desire to use the trary, the notice proposed to issue state­ the same economic considerations apply lowest available rate, it should not nor­ ments as to future Board policy in pass­ as were discussed above in connection mally have to concern itself with the ing upon applications for exemptions with the outbound rates. We cannot routing a scheduled flight would follow. from sections 401 and/or 403 of the Act agree, therefore, that the round-trip Moreover, in air transportation of cargo, to perform domestic charter or Category charter rate, 9.5 cents per ton-mile, rate differences due to different on-line A and Z services for the Department of would be reasonable for inbound Cate­ routings between origin and destination Defense (§ 399.16). One of the criteria gory A traffic. To the extent that com­ of the shipment afe extremely rare. Ac­ for approval of exemption applications paratively small inbound shipments are cordingly, we now believe it would be is that the level of compensation pro­ required, the Category A service offers more appropriate to eliminate the dis­ vided in the contract be fair and reason­ rates only slightly above the round-trip tinction between the North Pacific and able. W ith respect to Category A and Z passengers and Category A cargo, the charter rate and without any restriction other areas for purposes of the Category policy statement sets forth the minimum as to the types of commodities which A rates. The Category A cargo-rate fares and rates that will be considered may be shipped, as is the case with the structure would then be similar to the fair and reasonable. The policy state­ only commercial cargo rates that are Category -A and Z. passenger-rate struc­ ment does not purport to establish rates even close to being competitive. While ture in this respect. By. the same token, in air transportation. It sets the Seaboard argues that the proposed rates we will provide that the Category A and forth Board’s policy as to what it will consider would not attract traffic, we cannot, see Z passenger and cargo rates per passen­ to be the minimum fair and reasonable how the higher rates proposed by the ger- and ton-mile shall be applied to a compensation for the performance oi carrier would be any more effective in single rate-making mileage for each pair military .contracts pursuant to exemj)‘ this regard Accordingly, we find noth­ .31 of points. tions granted by the Board. The Boards ing in the comments to warrant a modi­ Accordingly, we conclude that the authority to attach reasonable terms an fication of the rates proposed in the no­ Category A cargo rate, for pallets in ex­ conditions to exemptions from the regu­ tice. As earlier noted, the rate for ship­ latory provisions ^>f the Act is uncus- ments in excess of four pallets shall bear cess of four, shall be 17.63 cents per ton- mile in all areas. The rate-making mile­ a rate equal to the one-way cargo char­ Neither do we have any doubt of our ages will normally reflect the shortest ter rate as modified in ER-432 (i.e., 17.63 authority to issue the policy statemen commercial routing as set forth in the cents per ton-mile). in § 399.38. The statement does not es With respect to the truck pickup serv- . current IATA Mileage Manual.13 tablish rates or abrogate the carrier ices at the military bases, the notice pre­ statutory duty-to file and ^hserve , scribed an add-on of 1-cent pei pound 12 In this connection, it appears to the and to provide service without unj Board that expression of these rates in dol­ to the rates applicable to and from the discrimination in air transportatio commercial airport. Seaboard contends lars and cents per 100 pounds in lieu of at just and reasonable rates ^ . ion that this is inadequate, since its actual whole cents per pound would result in actual yields per ton-mile closer to those set forth state and overseas air transport&ti trucking costs from the east coast bases herein. Section 399.38 states that it wiU be • averaged 2.61 cents per pound in 1964. 13 We anticipated that the Category A and B oard’s policy in passing upon the » However, information furnished by Pan Z fares and rates, applicable between com­ fulness of Category A and Z^anff h ^ American shows its trucking costs to be mercial air-carrier points, would be con­ by the carriers to give great w structed by applying the indicated rates per 1.2 cents per pound. The Board has re­ the level of the minimumratesandi ^ viewed the trucking cost data of each passenger- or ton-mile, as the case may be, specified as fair and reasona eX. carrier. It appears that the net cost per to the shortest mileage shown for each such pair of points in the IATA Mileage Manual. performance of Category A t re. pound depends on the type of arrange­ For air or truck cargo service to and from emptions. The statement d ^ z ment made with a surface carrier, the specified military bases in the U.S., addi­ quire that individual ^^f^minimum number of pallets or pounds shipped per tional charges of from 1 to 3 cents per pound tariff rates be identical to t jjei- truck trip, and the relative proportions would be imposed. For air or truck service Category A and Z exemption g » * « * to overseas or foreign military bases, no ad­ of traffic originating at McGuire Air ther is the policy stateme tory jg- ditional charge is required for such service by theBoard to circumventstatuto ^ Foree Base and at Dover Air Force Base. beyond the nearest commercial (onroute) point to the military base consistent with quirements with respect t 11 W ith respect to Seaboard’s contentiongenerally prevailing practice. By the same hearing in particular c^e® Act. The that the proposed rates will distort the token, the Category A cargo rate to/from the arise under section 1002 of a state-• structure, we would only observe that the overseas or foreign military base shall be no Board’s purpose is to set f ^ 0f the existing Category A cargo rate structure re­ less than the rate to/from the nearest com­ ment of policy for gfound the rates flects directional differences and there is mercial point, as, for example, the McGuire carriers. The Board has found^ fair nothing unusual about such differences in AFB-Mildenhall rate shall be no less than in § . (e) to be the mmm transportation generally. the McGuire AFB-London rate. 399 16 Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3875 and reasonable rates upon which is will EDR-79. Basically they were derived aircraft fails to take proper account of grant Category A and Z exemptions, from Form 41 data with recent cost in­ value of service.18 upon the basis of a study of carrier costs creases annualized but only to the extent DOD takes the position that it is in­ and the competitive relation between i that such cost increases had been docu­ appropriate to include an allowance for Category A and B traffic. It is reason­ mented by the carriers. For aircraft depreciation in any case where all allow­ able that the Board should give weight types not previously used on domestic able depreciation charges have already to its conclusions with respect to these military routes, the direct costs were beep recouped. rates in passing upon the lawfulness of based on Form 41 data, and the indirect With respect to the return element, Category A and Z tariffs filed by the costs were taken from the current ex­ most carriers contend that the 8-cent- carriers. perience of Logair contractors using per-mile operating margin is insufficient. With respect to tariffs for foreign' air DC-6 aircraft. It was also proposed to They contend that either a return com­ transportation, it is true that the Board state the minimum rates for Logair in puted on constructive investment should has no direct statutory power to regulate terms of great-circle rather than course- be used or the operating margin should the reasonableness of the rates. H ow ­ flown miles as had been the case. be computed by comparing the original ever, we do have power, after notice and The Department of Defense and six investment in DC-6 aircraft with that in hearing, to alter rates in foreign air carriers15 commented with respect to the C-46 rather than by merely comparing transportation that we find to be unjustly proposed rates for Logair and Quicktrans the operating- costs of each aircraft discriminatory, to the extent necessary charters. By far the most controversy type.17 DOD, on the other hand, con­ to correct such unjust discrimination. has centered on the treatment of depre­ tends that the operating margin for Tariffs for Category A or Z foreign air ciation. Most Logair and Quicktrans op­ D C -6 aircraft should bear the same ratio transportation setting rates lower than erations are being performed with DC-6 to expense as that used in the case of these minimums would raise questions of and DC-4 aircraft, a large number of C-46 equipment. unjust discrimination that might justify which are now or shortly will be fully A number of carriers contend that al­ investigation. depreciated. The magnitude of the re­ lowance should be made for inflationary Logair and Quicktrans minimum ductions proposed in rates applicable to cost increases that cannot be docu­ rates. For Logair and Quicktrans, we these aircraft types was almost entirely mented. They argue that a general proposed in PSDR-10 a substantial re­ due to Jhe fact that, in developing the trend of higher costs is borne out by duction in the D C -6A minimum ra te 14 carriers’ costs, depreciation expense was their historical experience and that the counterbalanced in part by a proposed allowed only to the extent that it would possibilities of achieving offsetting op­ increase in the minimum rate applicable actually be experienced in fiscal 1966. erating efficiencies with older aircraft to the AW-650. Using course-flown Of course, the fully depreciated status such as the DC-6 are minimal. Several miles, the DC-6A rate would have been of a substantial portion of the fleet af­ carriers have also attempted to docu­ reduced by 14.4 percent from $1.485 to fects the return element, and this factor ment some of the cost increases pro­ $1.272 per mile. The AW -650 rate, on also significantly contributed to the jected in their earlier submissions but the other hand, would have been in­ lower-cost computations contained in the disallowed by the Board in costing the creased by 3.6 percent from $1.490 to notice. Logair services. $1.543 per mile. In addition, we pro­ Of major significance with respect to The carriers find some fault with the posed reductions of the current D C -4 the depreciation problem is the fact that new minimum rates proposed for CL-44, and C-46 rates applicable to Quicktrans. not all carriers obtained their fleets at DC-7, and L-1049H aircraft, for which Finally, we proposed to establish rates the same time. Some are still experienc­ Board minimum rates are not currently tor the first time for L-1049H, DC-7F, ing substantial depreciation costs, while provided. Generally it is contended that ®^CL»44'aircraft in Logair services. others are not. The carriers argue thal^ rates lower than those proposed should The following table summarizes the basing the rate on an averaging of de­ be established. It is. asserted that the current Logair and Quicktrans rates, preciated and undepreciated aircraft cost data on which such rates were based the rates proposed in the notice, and the costs unfairly disadvantages those whose reflect in part the costs of operating fleets are still undepreciated and tends rates adopted herein: internationally in commercial services to freeze matters at the status quo. Ex­ and fail to take account of certain cost Rate pee Aibcbaft-Mile pansion of service or the substitution of savings available in domestic military DC-6’s on routes now being served with operations. Course-flown basis AW-650 aircraft may require the pur­ Finally, a number of carriers have ob­ chase of new aircraft at a substantial in­ jected to the proposed conversion from Current Proposed Adopted vestment. The carriers will not be will­ course-flown to great-circle miles. They rate rate1 rate ing, it is argued, to undertake such in­ argue that the-amount of deviation from Logair: vestment unless they are able to obtain route to route varies extensively and, 'DC-6A sufficient revenue to cover reasonable de­ therefore, some carriers would be favored AW-t50 ...... preciation charges. PC-7CF ...... and others disadvantaged by using great- L-1049H ..... The carriers also argue that their circle miles. O n the other hand, it is OI/-44_ 2.400 2.400 planning assumes a measure of rate sta­ argued that using course-flown miles is .735 .735 bility. A sharp and sudden rate reduc­ fair to all. A ll of the existing contractors tion related to the running out of depre­ have pointed to the fact that their costs Great-circle basis ciation is, they believe, inconsistent with tend to go up as their average length of Quicktrans: the stability required. In this connec­ hop goes down. They have therefore ...... _ 2 1.390 2 1.40 tion, they point to the fact that depre­ urged that a dual-element rate with D&Î route­ 1.203 2 1.203 2 1.211 rai« ther...... 2 1.455 2 1.482 ciation is normally an element of cost 16 As we construe it, the contention is that 2.700 2.713 and the Board has not required adjust­ the value of service has been established by ment of ordinary commercial rates in the fact that the services have been pur­ ^tairport-to-air'pStmfte Wereexpressedinterms instances where fully depreciated air­ chased at a rate reflecting a full measure of c usive of station costs. craft were being employed. It is also depreciation. However, in the circumstances argued that basing the rates purely on here present, we find no basis in value-of- tramf new Logair and Quid service considerations to establish a rate the cost of operating fully depreciated in essenti^u1^ rates were constructe higher than indicated by the costs of service. relating. + ly .^ e same manner as thoi 17 The 8-cent-per-mile operating margin 15 AAXICO Airlines, Inc., Airlift Interna­ ------international charters used for DC-6 aircraft in the proposal was i tional, Inc., The Flying Tiger Line Inc., The intended to reflect the fact that DC-6 op­ Slick Corp., World Airways, Inc., and Zantop erating expense is approximately double that cernefl, the n e Quicktrans services are coi Air Transport, Inc. Capitol Airways, Inc., for a C-46 aircraft for which the Board es­ tees only a rate covers line-haul ser filed a telegram declining comment. Zan- tablished an operating margin of 4 cents per 01 station

Quicktrans rates is warranted, although were concerned with rates only for this Board for the CL-44 28 and L-1049 are not to the extent proposed in the notice.20 aircraft, this result stems from the too high, arid Airlift makes a similar Heretofore, the Board’s approach has necessity to establish a uniform rate for contention regarding the proposed DC-7 been to review the individual carrier costs both types of aircraft and the DC-6A minimum rate. Both carriers argue that which comprise the range under consid­ cost structure at this particular point in the cost data used by the Board reflect eration and to determine the average time. On balance, we believe that the the higher costs of operating interna­ thereof on various bases. We have rate of $1.40 per aircraft-mile reflects an tionally and that no allowance has been usually adopted a rate close to the group appropriate balancing of the individual made for the availability of fuel at lower average with full knowledge that some carrier circumstances and costs.22 military prices. Only Plying Tiger, carriers will fare better than others. In opposing a reduction of the current however, has attempted to support the M.a sense, the carriers ask us to base the DC-6A rate, the carriers argue that op­ lower rates proposed by it with cost data. rate on the highest cost. On the other erations with aircraft not fully depre­ The cost data supplied by Flying Tiger hand, DOD proposes that we ignore the ciated (e.g., the Argosy) will be uneco­ raise questions in a number of respects costs of the Argosy aircraft. However, nomic and even effectively precluded by and, being unreported, cannot be veri­ we have consistently refused to give ex­ a lower rate. It is then argued that, in fied.24 On the other hand, it is xtrue that clusive or undue weight to either the such eventuality, additional DC-6 A air­ the reported data do, in part, reflect the lowest- or highest-cost carrier or aircraft craft would be required to operate the costs of operating internationally where type, and we find no basis to adopt a dif­ Logair routes but such new and addi­ larger crew complements are required. ferent approach with respect to this rate tional aircraft could not be operated Moreover, the higher price of commercial proceeding. economically at rates which reflect less fuel is also in part reflected, although The revised cost data for the entire than normal depreciation. both Flying Tiger and Airlift perform a group of DC-6A and Argosy operators The Board is aware of these circum­ large number of international military average about $1.42 per mile if each car­ stances and potential problems. But the charters where fuel may be obtained at rier’s cost is given equal weight and $1.40 circumstances here present are not es­ military prices. However, it must be rec­ per mile weighting by number of aircraft sentially different from those in other ognized that the carriers’ reported costs committed to MATS. These averages military rate reviews where we have en­ also reflect the favorable impact of their fall in between the separate averages for countered a group of carriers with relatively long-haul overseas and foreign the DC-6A and Argosy aircraft, the varying costs of operations. The fact MATS charters. former being 5 to 7 cents lower and the that the cost differences in this situation We have reviewed the rates earlier latter 14 to 18 cents per mile higher. On stem principally from depreciation dif­ proposed in the light of the comments re­ consideration.,of these data including ferences does not make the present ceived but find no basis to modify them. the cost data of the individual carriers, problem of establishing a uniform rate The costs relied on and the rates them­ we conclude that a rate of $1.40 per air­ unique. It is recognized that in the cir­ selves appear to be consistent with the craft-mile (course-flown basis) would be cumstances here present the rate minimum rates for the foreign and over­ reasonable for the DC-6A and Argosy adopted herein may not remain fair and seas MATS charters. Effective July 1, aircraft.21 reasonable if those circumstances ma­ 1965, the minimum cargo rate for such Such rate would fall near the top of terially change. By the same token, charters will be 9.5 cents per ton-mile. the range of DC-6A costs as recognized such rate may not be appropriate beyond For the CL-44 aircraft, such rate yields herein. None of the DC-6 operators fiscal year 1966. We anticipate that the $2.79 per aircraft-mile which is moder­ should experience difficulty in operating rates will be subject to further review ately above the rate established herein Profitably at such rate with their cur­ for subsequent contract years and can for domestic Logair services with CL- rent aircraft. As regards the Argosy be modified to reflect the facts and cir­ 44’s.25 For the piston aircraft used in aircraft, the $1.40 rate would cover each cumstances then obtaining. M A T S charter services, a rate of 12.5 carrier’s operating costs and allow a The fixing of Logair minimum rates cents per ton-mile applies,28 yielding Profit margin which would differ for the applicable to aircraft types not now per­ $2.25 per aircraft-mile, which is moder­ o carriers concerned. W hile such re- forming such service necessarily in­ ately above the Logair rate proposed for WQ. element or profit margin would be volves a large measure of judgment. the L-1049H and DC-7CF aircraft. smaller than normally allowable if we Cost data available for such aircraft re­ In addition, the proposed rates for flect the operational characteristics of Logair services are generally below pre­ thn+'+if iac*s available to the Board indicate services that differ substantially from vailing domestic commercial charter be in™? CUfrent rate by itself should Logair, and the aircraft now perform­ rates reflecting, it must be assumed, cer­ ever I me

with normal industry cost patterns and one hand and Hawaii or Alaska on the (6) The cargo charges determined-in tend to support the validity of the pro­ other hand. accordance with subparagraphs (2) posed rates. Accordingly, we will adopt (c) The minimum charges consideredthrough (5) of this paragraph shall be the rates proposed for these aircraft. It fair and reasonable for the performance applied on the basis of a standard weight will, however, be necessary to convert the of Logair domestic military charter serv­ per pallet of 4,500 pounds. proposed rates from a great-circle to a ices will be as follows: 2. A dd a new § 399.38 as follows: course-flown mileage basis, and approxi­ Rate per aircraft statute mile § 399.38 Military tariff rates. mately a 10-percent deviation factor has ( course-flown been used for this purpose. Aircraft type: miles) In passing' upon the lawfulness of DOD has requested that the C-46 mini­ DC-6A ______$1,400 tariffs specifying rates and fares for the mum rate proposed for Quicktrans be AW-650 ______— 1.400 transportation of Category A (individ­ extended in application to Logair where . DC-7F, L-1049H______1.950 ually waybilled) military cargo or.Cate­ the C-46 is not being currently employed. '^‘CL-44 ______2. 400 gory A and Z (individually ticketed) However, the C-46 Quicktrans rate has C-46 ______- . 735 military passengers in foreign or over­ been costed on the basis of a single route (d) The minimum line-haul chargesseas air transportation or in air trans­ in a particular area of the country which considered fair and reasonable for the portation between the 48 contiguous has favorable operational characteristics performance of Quicktrans domestic States on the one hand and Hawaii or for producing relatively lower costs. On military charter services will be as fol­ Alaska on the other hand, the Board will the other hand, it has only been one year lows: give great weight to the level of rates and since the Board completed a thorough re­ Rate per aircraft fares computed in accordance with view of C-46 Logair costs.28 W e then * statute mile § 399.16(e). (direct airport-to- found that a rate of 73.5 opnts per course- (Sec. 204, 403, 404, 416,1002, Federal Aviation flown mile was required. There appears Aircraft type: airport miles) D C -6 A ______—______$1,400 Act of 1958, as amended; 72 Stat. 743, 758, 760, 771, 788, as amended; 49 U.S.C. 1324, to be no reason to depart from this rate, DC-4: which has been in effect throughout the Trunk routes______1. 211 1373, 1374, 1386, 1482; sec. 3, Administrative current fiscal year. Accordingly, since Feeder routes______1.482 Procedure Act, 60 Stat. 238, 5 U.S.C. 1002) DOD desires establishment of a C-46 C-46 ______.713 By the Civil Aeronautics Board. Logair rate, the Board will continue the (e) The minimum charges considered existing rate of 73.5 cents per course- [ s e a l] ' H arold R. Sanderson, fair and reasonable for the transporta­ Secretary. flown mile. tion of Category A and Z individually As regards the Quicktrans DC-4 rates, [F.R. Doc. 65-2931; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; ticketed passengers and Category A in­ we have revised the rates proposed in 8:45 a.m.] dividually waybilled cargo in foreign and the notice to reflect a 0.9-cent-per- overseas air transportation and in air revenue-mile increase in maintenance transportation between the 48 contigu­ expenses consistent with revision for ous States on the one hand and Hawaii D C -6 A services. W e have further revised Title 16-COMMERCIAL or Alaska on the other hand will be as the D C -4 Quicktrans rate arid, in addi­ follows: ction, the C-46 rate, to reflect the same PRACTICES (1) Passengers, per passenger-mile: 7.7-percent operating margin (ratio of Chapter I— Federal Trade Commission profit to operating expenses) used for Cents DC-6A aircraft. So revised, the mini­ Second ^economy) class------_.— 3. 75 [Docket 8625 etc.] Third (thrift) class------3. 29 mum rates per direct airport-to-airport PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE mile are as follows: (2) Cargo, per ton-mile: PRACTICES DC-4: One to four pallets per flight: Feeder ______:------$1,482 Eastbound transatlantic or west­ Branford Co., Inc., et al. T ru n k ______1. 211 bound transpacific^ ------12. 00 C-46 ______— ____ _ .713 Westbound transatlantic or east- Branford Co., Inc., Docket 8625, bound transpacific-______.— 10. 00 Brownie Knitting Mills, Inc., ^ . In consideration of the foregoing, the Pallets in excess of four per flight____ 17. 63 8626, Barclay Knitwear Co., Inc., Doom Civil Aeronautics Board hereby amends 8632 Part 399, Statements of General Policy (3) The foregoing rates per passen­ Subpart—Discriminating in price wi­ (14 C FR Part 399), effective July 1, 1965, ger-mile and per ton-mile shall be ap­ der J*. 2, Clayton Acti-PaymenUor as follows: plied to the shortest mileage between the services or facilities for processing 1. Amend § 399.16 to read as follows:commercial air-carrier points as set under 2 (d ): § 13.825 Allowances for sen forth in the current IATA Mileage Man­ ices or facilities. § 399.16 Military exemptions. ual to compute point-to-point passenger (a) In passing upon applications for fares and cargo rates per pound. (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 j j J S l « exemptions from sections 401 and 403 (4) For cargo services to/from mili­ or applies sec. 2, 49 Stat. I 526’ InC„ [Cease and desist or* ^ B r a n f ^ of the Act to enable air carriers, to per­ tary bases in the United States, the rates Docket 8625, Brownie K ^ tt} ^ J z Co, Inc., form contracts for air transportation for per pound computed in accordance with Docket 8626, and Barclay ig65] the Department of Defense, the Board subparagraph (3) of this paragraph shall Docket 8632, New York, N.Y., Jan. will give great weight to the following be increased in the following amounts: m the Matter of Bran/ord Co. criteria: (1) Whether the carrier has contrac­ Corporation, Brownie Jf ^ y Knit- Add-on per pound Inc., a Corporation, and Barn V tually committed its CRAF aircraft to the Certificated ter­ minal point Air Force base wear Co., Inc., a Corporation Department of Defense; Air Truck (2) Whether the proposed service is pickup pickup Consent orders requhing ap. in furtherance of the mission of the De­ York City manufacturers of w of ^ partment of Defense; and Cents Cents parel to cease violatmg s paying 2 1 (3) Whether the level of compensation 3 2 Clayton Act by such alio*' provided in the contract is fair and San Francisco.... 2 1 advertising, promotional or otW ^ reasonable. ances to favored ch payments ucts, while not naakmg such ^ (b) r The minimum charges set forth (5) For cargo services to/from mili­ available on proportionally ^ lpbsjporn- in Part 288 of this chapter will be con­ tary bases outside the United States, the sidered as the minimum fair and reason­ rates per pound shall not be less than to all competing customers fur. iner effective date of the or able charges for foreign and overseas the rates to/from the nearest commercial ther order of the Comnflssio . deslst point for which Category A rates are charter services and for charter services Identical orders to cease three between the 48 contiguous States on the published, computed in accordance with respondents in these subparagraphs (2) and (3) of this para­ nbining sa Order E-20424, Jan. 31,1964. graph. Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3879

It is ordered, That (the respondents and upon the front flap of the jacket or Textile Fiber Products Identification Act. Branford Co., Inc., Brownie Knitting dust cover and the title page of hard­ Subpart—Using misleading name— Mills, Inc., and Barclay Knitwear Co., cover books, and excepting from the Goods: § 13.2280 Composition: 13.2280- Inc., corporations, their officers, direc­ order books published outside of the 70 Textile Fiber Products Identification tors, agents, representatives and employ­ United States in a language other than Act. ees, directly or through any corporate or English, unless a prior English language (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret other device, in the course of their busi­ edition has been published. or apply sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; 72 ness in commerce), as “commerce” is The order as modified is as follows: Stat. 1717; 15 U.S.C. 45, 70) [Cease and de­ sist order, Mr. Romano, Inc., et al., Beverly defined in the Clayton Act, as amended, It is ordered, That the Commission’s Hills, Calif., Docket C-877, Feb. 8, 1965] do forthwith cease and desist from : order to cease and desist issued in this Paying or contracting for the payment matter on January 13,1955, be, and here­ In the Matter of Mr. Romano, Inc., and of anything of value to, or for the bene­ by is, modified by substituting for para­ Malibu Clothes, Ltd., Corporations, and fit of, any customer of the respondent as graphs numbered one and two of said Bel-Air Clothes, Ltd., a Corporation, compensation or in consideration for order the following: Trading as Malibu Clothes, and Wil­ advertising or promotional services, or 1. Offering for sale or selling any liam Firestone and Stanley Firestone, any other service or facility, furnished abridged copy of a book unless one of Individually and as Officers of Said by or through such customer in connec­ the following words, namely: “abridged,” Corporations tion with the handling, sale or offering “abridgment,” “condensed,” o r - “con­ for sale of wearing apparel products Consent order requiring three affiliated densation,” or any other words or phrases manufactured, sold or offered for sale by Beverly Hills, Calif., clothing retailers to ^stating with equal clarity that said book respondent, unless such payment or con­ cease violating the Textile Fiber Products is abridged, appears in clear, conspicuous sideration is made available on propor­ Identification Act by falsely advertising type upon the front cover and upon the tionally equal terms to all other cus­ the fiber content of men’s apparel, by title page of paperback books and upon tomers competing with such favored using generic names of fibers and fiber the front flap of the jacket or dust cover customer in the distribution or resale of trademarks in an improper manner on and upon the title page of hard-cover such products. labels and in written advertisements, and books, either in immediate connection It is further ordered, That the effective failing to set forth other required infor­ with the title or in another position date of the order to cease and desist be, mation. adapted readily to attract the attention and it hereby is, postponed until further The order to cease and desist, includ­ of a prospective purchaser. order of the Commission. ing further order requiring report of 2. Using or substituting a new title for, compliance therewith, is as follows: Issued: January 18, 1965. or in place of, the original title of a re­ By the Commission. printed book, except any book originally It is ordered, That respondents, Mr. published outside of the United States of Romano, Inc., and Malibu Clothes, Ltd., [seal] Jo s e ph W . S h e a , America in a language other than Eng­ corporations, and Bel-Air Clothes, Ltd., Secretary. lish, unless a statement which reveals the a corporation, trading as Malibu Clothes, [F.R. Doc. 65-3043; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; original title of the book and that it has and William Firestone and Stanley Fire­ 8:46 a.m.] been published previously thereunder ap­ stone, individually and as officers of said pears in clear, conspicuous type upon the corporations, and respondents’ repre­ front cover and upon the title page of a sentatives, agents and employees, directly [Docket 5811 o.] paperback book and upon the front flap or through any corporate or other device, PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE of the jacket or dust cover and upon the do forthwith cease and desist from in­ PRACTICES title page of hard cover books, either in troducing, delivering for introduction, immediate connection with the new title selling, advertising, or offering for sale, New American Library of World or in another position adapted readily to in commerce, or transporting or causing Literature, Inc., et al. attract the attention of a prospective to be transported in commerce, or im­ purchaser; provided, however, that any porting into the United States, any tex­ s —Misbranding or mislabeling: book, although originally published in a tile fiber product; or selling, offering for s u 1230 Identity; § 13.1265 Old, second­ foreign language, if it has been previously sale, advertising, delivering, transport­ ing' rectoiTned, or reconstructed prod- published in an English language edition, ing, or causing to be transported, any . af new- Subpart— Misrepresenting shall comply with the disclosure require­ textile fiber product which has been ad­ and goods— G oods: § 13.1605 onferaf; § i 3.i655 Identity; § 13.1695 ments of this proviso. vertised or offered for sale in commerce; or selling, offering for sale, advertising, Issued: January 11,1965. tfriin+e*ond^land’ reclaimed or recon- delivering, transporting, or causing to be unfairw as. new- Subpart—Neglecting By the Commission. transported, after shipment in commerce, diviac, or decePtively, to make material any textile fiber product, whether in its ? S S f . e:s§,13-1850 Content; §13.1855 [ s e a l ] J o s e ph W . S h e a , Secretary. original state or contained in other tex­ claimp%‘ ^ 13 1880 Old, used, or re- tile fiber products, as the terms “com­ Bonv l ’ ,as unused or new: 13.1880-2C [F.R. Doc. 65-3044; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; merce” and “textile fiber product” are ina no™ es‘ SubPart— Using mislead- 8:46 a.m.] defined in the Textile Fiber Products §13 23? ^ Goods: § 1.3.2300 Identity, Identification Act : or d’ secondhand, reconstructed eused as new: 13.2320-10 Book titles! [Docket C-877] 1. Which are falsely or deceptively stamped, tagged, labeled, invoiced, ad­ MapDlv3^ 1^ - 721; 15 u s c - «*• Interpret PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE vertised or otherwise identified as to the bS.c. 4r\ ?'5’38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 PRACTICES name or amount of constituent fibers can Lihrn«, nrder, The New Ameri- contained therein. Ifew York yw v W°rld Literature, Inc., et al. Mr. Romano, Inc., et al. N Y- Docket 5811, Jan. 11, 1965] 2. Unless each such product has se­ Subpart— Advertising falsely or mis­ curely affixed thereto or placed thereon a °J The New American Li- leadingly: § 13.10 Advertising falsely or stamp, tag, label or other means of i iterature> Inc > a Cor~ misleadingly; § 13.30 Composition of identification correctly showing each ele­ bright Ev^ cJl and Victor W ey- goods: 13.30-75 Textile Fiber Products ment of information required to be dis­ The New d^ f ually and as Officers of Identification Act; § 13.45 Content; closed by section 4(b) of the Textile Fiber u teratZPAr ' eriean Library of World § 13.73 Formal regulatory and statutory Products Identification Act. crature, Inc., a Corporation 3. Which designates a fiber by its requirements: 13.73-90 Textile Fiber generic name on any label when such uary 1% modified order of Jan- Products Identification Act. Subpart— fiber is present in any textile fiber prod­ reM rtL nn;20 P-R- 612’ 01 P T.C. SS S- Misbranding or mislabeling: § 13.1185 uct in amount of five per centum or less. ^ing Of !i tlcc\ of abridgment and re- Composition: 13.1185-80 Textile Fiber 4. Which uses a fiber trademark on lhat such ,f1?rited books— by providing Products Identification Act; § 13.1200 labels affixed to such textile fiber prod­ cover and Ce appear on the front Content; § 13.1212 Formal regulatory ucts without the generic name of the e Page ° f Paperback books and statutory requirements: 13.1212-80 fiber appearing on the said label. \ 3880 RULES AND REGULATIONS

5. Which uses a generic name or fiberdirectly, that a textile fiber product is Issued: January 14,1965. trademark on any label, whether re­ composed wholly or substantially of such quired or non-required, without making fiber, when such product is not com­ By the Commission. a full and complete fiber content dis­ posed wholly or substantially of such [ s e a l ] Joseph W . Shea, closure in accordance with the Act and fiber. Secretary. Regulations the first time such generic It is further ordered, That the respond­ [F.R. Doc. 65-3046; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; name or fiber trademark appears on the ents herein shall, within sixty (60) days 8:46 am .] label. after service upon them of this order, It is further ordered, That respondents, file with the Commission a report in Mr. Romano, Inc., and Malibu Clothes, writing setting forth in detail the man­ Ltd., corporations, and Bel-Air Clothes, ner and form in which they have com­ Title 17— COMMODITY AND Ltd., a corporation, trading as Malibu plied with this order. Clothes, and William Firestone and Issued: February 8, 1965. SECURITIES EXCHANGES Stanley Firestone, individually and as Chapter II— Securities and Exchange officers of said corporations, and re­ By the Commission. spondents’ representatives, agents and Commission [ s e a l ] J o s e ph W . S h e a , employees, directly or through any cor­ Secretary. [Release 33-4767 etc.] porate or other device* in connection with the introduction^ delivery for intro­ [F.R. Doc. 65-3045; Plied, Mar. 24, 1965; PART 200— ORGANIZATION; CON­ duction, sale, advertising, or offering for 8:46 a.m.] DUCT AND ETHICS; AND INFORMA­ sale, in commerce, or the transportation TION AND REQUESTS or causing to be transported in com­ [Docket 0-802] merce, or the importation into the United Delegation of Authority to Director of Office of Opinions and Review States, of any textile fiber product; or in PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE connection with the sale, offering for sale, PRACTICES The Securities and Exchange Commis­ advertising, delivery, transportation, or sion has adopted an amendment to Sub­ causing to be transported, of any textile Vincent Cigar Co. et al. part A of Part 200 of Title 17 CFR, to fiber product which has been advertised provide for delegation by the Commis­ or offered for sale in commerce; or in Subpart— Advertising falsely or mis­ sion to the Director of the Office of Opin­ connection with the sale, offering for leadingly: § 13.30 Composition; § 13.235 ions and Review of the function of issu­ sale, advertising, delivery, transporta­ Source or origin: 13.235-60 Place: 13.- ing findings and orders pursuant to of­ tion, or causing to be transported, after 235-60 (a ) Domestic products as im­ fers of settlement which the Commission shipment in commerce, of any textile ported. Subpart—Furnishing means has determined should be accepted. fiber product, whether in its original and instrumentalities of misrepresenta­ The action of the Commission follows: state or contained in other textile fiber tion or deception: § 13.1055 Furnishing Subpart A of Part 200 is amended by products, as the terms “commerce” and means and instrumentalities of misrep­ adding a new § 200.30-6 (a) (1) (iv) as “textile Fiber-product” are defined in the resentation or deception. follows: Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret § 200.30—6 Delegation of authority to do forthwith cease and desist from: or apply sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 Falsely and deceptively advertising U.S.C. 45) [Modified cease and desist order, Director o f Office of Opinions and textile fiber products by: Vincent Ruilova trading as Vincent Cigar Review. 1. Making any representations, by dis­ Company (Tâmpa, Fla.), et al., Docket C-802, ***** Jan. 14,1965] closure or by implication, as to the fiber (a)(1) * * *~ . . „ contents of any textile fiber product in In the Matter of Vincent Ruilova, an In­ (iv) Except where the Commission any written advertisement which is used dividual Trading as Vincent Cigar otherwise directs, to issue findings and to aid, promote, o r assist, directly or in­ Company, Villazon & Company, Inc., a orders pursuant to offers of settlement directly, in the sale or offering for sale Corporation, and Frank Llaneza, and which the Commission has determined of such textile fiber product, unless the Jose Llaneza, Jr., Individually and as should be accepted. same information required to be shown Officers of Said Corporation, The on the stamp, tag, label or other means House of Deimage, Inc., a Corporation, The Commission finds that the fore- of identification under sections 4(b) (1) and Fred R. Dulmage, A. F. Fernandez ►ing amendment involves matters o and (2) of the Textile Fiber Products and W. E. Renberg, Individually and ;ency organization or procedure Identification Act is contained in the said as Officers of Said Corporation advertisement, except that the percent­ at notice and subsequent ages of the fibers present in the textile Order modifying desist order of Au­ irsuant to subsections 4 (a) and (d> fiber product need not be stated. gust 3, 1964, 29 F.R. 12111, prohibiting .e Administrative Procedure Act 2. Using a fiber trademark in advèr- false labeling of cigars by striking there­ >t required. The Commission tisements without a full disclosure of the from paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 which pro­ ids that the provisions of ¿bsecfc required content information in at least hibited false representations, including c) of the Administrative fP ^ d w one instance in the said advertisement. use of foreign words and depictions, that ;t regarding postponement of me 3. Using a fiber trademark in adver­ cigars made in the United States and of re date are inapplicable inasmuch tising textile fiber products containing home-grown tobacco were made in Cuba is is not a substantive rule. more than one fiber without such fiber or another foreign cbuntry and required Accordingly, the foregoing action is disclosure of the country of origin of trademark appearing in the required ken pursuant to Public Law Na § fiber content information in immediate constituent tobaccos represented to be f Stat. 394, and is effective March proximity and conjunction with the foreign grown. generic name of the fiber in plainly leg­ The order modifying the order to cease and desist is as follows: B y the Commission. ible type or lettering of equal size and conspicuousness. It is ordered, That the order contained [£MJ °*v*tL-SSS*. 4. Using the generic name of a fiber in in the decision and order issued by the M arch 15, 1965. advertising in such a manner as to be Commission on August 3, 1964, be, and 24, 1965; false, deceptive or misleading as to fiber it hereby is, modified by striking prohibi­ TF.R. Doc. 65-3047; Filed, Mar. content, or to indicate directly or in­ tions numbered 2, 3, and 4. L 8:46 a.m.] Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3881

4. Amend section 5 Assumption of or presumptively service-connected dis­ Title 32A— NATIONAL DEFENSE, risk by owner and attachment and can­ ease or injury will be held to exist to the cellation dates of commercial insurance extent required if it is manifested by a APPENDIX by changing the attachment date stated symptom or other identifiable residual. in paragraph (e) Vessels presently in (72 Stat. 1114; 38 U.S.C. 210) Chapter XVIII— N a tio n a l Shipping operation under General Agency Agree­ Authority, Maritime Administration, ment 3-19-51 to read “March 31, 1965, These V A Regulations are effective the Department of Commerce midnight, e.s.t.” date of approval. Approved: March 19, 1965. [NSA Order 6 (INS-1, 7th Rev., Amdt. 7) ] 5. Amend section 7(a) to read as fol­ lows: By direction of the Administrator. INS-1— MARINE PROTECTION AND Sec. 7 Insurance premiums. INDEMNITY INSURANCE INSTRUC­ [ seal] C y r il F. B rickfield, Deputy Administrator. TIONS UNDER GENERAL AGENCY (a ) Payment of premiums. Prem i­ ums for P & I Insurance provided under [F.R. Doc. 65-3075; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; AND BERTH AGENCY AGREEMENTS the policies shall be paid by each Gen­ 8:48 am .] Miscellaneous Amendments eral Agent quarterly in advance for the period from the date of attachment of Effective as of M arch 31, 1965, mid­ such insurance to March 31, 1966, mid­ night, e.s.t., INS-1, 7th Rev., is hereby night, e.s.t. Brokerage, if any, shall be Title 33— NAVIGATION AND amended as follows: allowed, but in no event to exceed one- 1. In section 1 What this order does, half percent of the annual premiums for NAVIGABLE WATERS change the attachment date stated each commenced quarter. therein to read “M arch 31, 1965, mid­ Chapter II— Corps of Engineers, night, e.s.t.” 6. Amend section 9 Settlement of Department of the Army 2. Amend section 2 by changing the claims by changing the attachment date name of the insurer and the attachment stated in paragraph (c) Claims declined PART 207— NAVIGATION and expiration dates to read as follows: by underwriters to read “M arch 31,1965, midnight, e.s.t.” REGULATIONS Sec. 2 Insurer. 7. Amend section 11 Report of claims Black Rock Canal, N.Y. Sayre & Toso, Inc., 300 California by changing thé reporting date stated in Street, San Francisco, Calif., 94104, G en ­ paragraph (b) to read “December 31, Correction eral Agents for the Commerce and In ­ 1965.” In F.R. Doc. 65-2578, appearing at dustry Insurance Co. (hereinafter re­ In accordance with the provisions of page 3382 of the issue for Saturday, ferred to as “Underwriter”) , entered into section 4 of the Administrative Proce­ M arch 13,1965, the following corrections an insuring agreement with the owner dure Act (5 U.S.C. 1003), it is found to are made in § 207.590(1) (4) ( i ) : covering the period from M arch 31, 1965, be impracticable-and not in the public 1. In the first sentence, “latitude N. 52° midnight, e.s.t„ to M arch 31, 1966, m id­ interest to delay the effective date there­ 50.1'” should read “latitude N. 42° 50.1'”. night, e.s.t. of; therefore, the foregoing amendments 2. In the third sentence, “West shall be effective as aforesaid. 3. Amend section 4 to read as follows: Breaker” should read “West Break­ Approved: March 18, 1965, Director, water”. Sec* 4 Vessels insured and terms o f in­ National Shipping Authority. surance. J. W . G ttlick, The Underwriter has agreed to provide Deputy Maritime Administrator. P & I Insurance with respect to General Title 45— PUBLIC WELFARE Agency vessels operated in the employ­ [F.R. Doc. 65-3068; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; Chapter X— Office of Economic 8:47 a.m.] ment of the Military Sea Transporta­ Opportunity tion Service (referred to in this order as MSTS”), for a period of one year PART 1030— COMMUNITY ACTION “tfdnight, e.s.t., M arch 31, 1965, at Title 38— PENSIONS, BONUSES, PROGRAMS ZSP* ra,te °f $4.05 per gross regis- t ?.ton °h a daily pro rata basis, at- A new Part 1030 is added to Chapter X 68 Provided in section 4 (a ), (b ), AND VETERANS’ RELIEF of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regu­ , (d), and (e) of this order and termi- Chapter I— Veterans Administration lations to include interim regulations of «Jting as of midnight, e.s.t., M arch 31, the Office of Economic Opportunity with o, or m accordance with section 5 (c ), PART 3— ADJUDICATION respect to the administration of pro­ grams under Title II-A of the Economic in«»* ’ an(* ^ this order. This Subpart A— Pension, Compensation, Opportunity Act, as follows: a p / r t6 covers the vessel’s liability of In«« Insur&nce nature except for any and Dependency and Indemnity § 1030.10 Criteria for grants exceeding «A damage or expense in respect to Compensation 90 percent of program costs. “ cluding baggage and personal M iscellaneous A m e n d m e n t s (a ) Purpose. U nder section 208(a) of DrorwM4?f Passengers, if any, or cargo’s 1. Section 3.325 is revoked. the Economic Opportunity Act, grants chaiW°n °* general average or special authorized under sections 204 and 205 carJ? t’,T?r^n.any °ther way relating to § 3.325 Ascertainable service-connected may exceed 90 percent of the costs re­ carripHWlllC*\.is be carried» is being disability in existence at time o f ferred to in those sections if the Director such vL or, bas been carried on board death. [Revoked] determines that assistance in excess of any 11'3? e limit <* Ability in 2. In § 3.357, paragraph (b) is amend­ 90 percent is required in furtherance of cident r!? ska11 be $250,000 for each ac- ed to read as follows: the purposes of the Act. Such a deter­ deduefir,« °*c* rrence Per vessel, with a mination is required to be pursuant to § 3*357 Rating of noncompensable disa­ occurrpnn °* for each accident or objective criteria adopted and promul­ bilities. illnes« n»e/ esJlilting in Personal injury, gated by the Director. The purpose of cident’ nJ dea^b’ $500 for each ac­ * * * * * this section is to establish interim criteria cept ,‘nnHu!BU7 eilCe of other types ex- (b ) Civil service preference ratings.for m aking grants in excess of 90 percent damavo t * j ln”> ^Prial expenses, and For the purpose of civil service disability of program costs. ‘‘PuttfnV? i ° Cks’ buoys, etc. Claims for preference certifications, an evaluation (b ) General. Assistance granted un­ age to L v ’ burial expenses, and dam - of less than 10 percent may be made. der sections 204 and 205 will exceed 90 to a S S S’^ Uoys’ etc- are ™ t subject Except for disabilities incurred in com­ percent of the costs referred to in those agreed t ductlon- The Underwriter has bat, some extent of service-connected sections if the Director determines that $200 for* u ^ ^ P ^ liability not to exceed disability is required. In considering a both of the following criteria are satis­ or ohrial expenses. less than 10-percent rating, any directly fied: 3882 RULES AND REGULATIONS

(1) The per capita income of the com­ Effective date: Date of signature. open to fishing. These open areas, com­ prising 790 acres or 13 percent of the total munity to be served by the program is Dated: M arch 18,1965. less than $750 per annum; and water area of the refuge, are delineated (2) A reasonable effort to raise 10 S argent S h r iv e r , on a map available at the refuge head­ percent of the program cost from non- Director, quarters and from the office of the Re­ Pederal sources, both public and private, Office of Economic Opportunity. gional Director, Bureau of Sport Fish­ eries and Wildlife, 1006 West Lake Street, has been made without success. [F.R. Doc. 65-3069; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; (c) Determination of per capita in­ 8:47 a.m.] Minneapolis 8, Minn. Sport fishing come. The per capita income of a com­ shall be in accordance with all applicable munity will be determined from such evi­ State regulations and is subject to the dence as may be available. Data on per following conditions: capita incomes for 1959, as indicated by Title 50— WILDLIFE AND (1) The open season for sport fishing the 1960 census for counties and for many on the refuge during daylight hours only other areas, may be obtained from the FISHERIES extends from April 24, 1965, through Office of Economic Opportunity. In the September 6, 1965, in the Walsh Creek absence of other evidence, this census and Driggs River; April 24,1965, through Chapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries December 31, 1965, on the Manistique data will be accepted as establishing the and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife present level of per capita income for River; June 1, 1965, through September Service, Department of the Interior 6,1965, on the Show Pools; and from July the areas for which it is available. 1, 1965, through September 6, 1965, on (d ) Determination of inability to raise PART 33— SPORT FISHING C -3 Pool. local share. A determination that the (2) Boating and the use of minnows applicant has made a reasonable effort Seney National Wildlife Refuge, for bait is prohibited except on the Man­ to raise the 10 percent non-Federal share Michigan istique River. will be made upon the basis of facts sub­ The provisions of this special regula­ The following special regulation is mitted by the applicant. tion supplement the regulations which issued and is effective on date of publi­ (e) Percentage of program costs to be govern fishing on wildlife refuge areas cation in the F ederal R eg ist e r . borne by Office of Economic Opportunity. generally which are set forth in Title 50, In cases in which assistance is granted § 33.5 Special regulations; sport fish­ Code of Federal Regulations, Part 33, and are effective through December 31,1965. which exceeds 90 percent of program ing; for individual wildlife refuge areas. costs, the percentage of costs borne by R. W . B u r w e u , M ic h ig a n the Office of Economic Opportunity will Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. depend upon the amount which can SENEY NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE feasibly be raised from non-Federal Sport fishing on the Seney National M arch 18, 1965. sources. Wildlife Refuge, Michigan, is permitted [F.R. Doc. 65-3064; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; 8:47 a.m.] (78 Stat. 519; 42 U.S.C. 2788) only on the areas designated by signs as available fpr public inspection at the States Department of Labor, seventh DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE office of the Hearing Clerk during regular floor, Condominio San Alberto Building, business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b) ). 1200 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Santurce, Consumer and Marketing Service Puerto Rico, and shall commence its Dated: M arch 19,1965. I 7 CFR Part 915 1 hearing at 1:30 p.m. on the same date at P a u l A. N ic h o l s o n , the same place. Following this hearing AVOCADOS GROWN IN SOUTH Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg­ Industry Committee No. 73-B shall meet FLORIDA etable Division, Consumer at the same place at hours designated and Marketing Service. by the committee chairman to conduct Containers [F.E. Doc. 65-3067; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; its investigation and to hold its hearing. Consideration is being given to the fol­ 8:47 a.m.] Each industry committee shall recom­ lowing proposal submitted by the Avo­ mend to the Administrator of the Wage cado Administrative Committee, estab­ and Hour and Public Contracts Divisions lished pursuant to the marketing agree­ of this Department the highest minimum ment, as amended, and Order No. 915, as UEPARTMENT OF LABOR wage rates (in the case of question (1) amended (7 CFR Part 915), regulating Wage and Hour Division referred to the committee, not exceeding the handling of avocados grown in south the minimum wage rate of $1.25 per hour, Florida, effective under the Agricultural [ 29 CFR Parts 602, 603 1 and in the case of question (2) referred to the committee, not exceeding the Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as [Administrative Order 590] amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), minimum wage rate of $1.15 per hour for The proposal is that the avocado con­ INDUSTRY COMMITTEES FOR VARI­ immediate effect and $1.25 per hour for tainer regulation, Avocado Order 5 OUS INDUSTRIES IN PUERTO RICO effect on and after September 3, 1965, (§915.305; 29 F.R. 8463), be amended and in no case less than the currently to prescribe that, when packed in the Appointment To Investigate Condi­ effective rate) which it determines, hav­ containers with inside dimensions 1 3 ^ x tions and Recommend Minimum ing due regard to economic and competi­ 16'/2 x 3y4 inches, or 13% x 1 6 ^ x 3% Wages; Notice of Hearings tive conditions, will not substantially Inches, or 13y2 x 16y2 x 4x/2 inches, speci­ curtail employment in the industry and fied in subdivisions (ii), (iii), and (iv ), Pursuant to section 5 of the Fair Labor will not give any industry in Puerto Rico respectively, of § 915.305(b) (1 ), avocados Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 205), a competitive advantage over any indus­ of the Dr. DuPuis, Katherine, Nirody, Reorganization Plan No. 6 of 1950 (3 try in the United States outside of Puerto Rue, Sherman, Marcus, Nelson, Catalina, C FR 1949-53 Comp., p. 1004), and 29 Rico, the Virgin Islands, and American '**•» Murphy, Leona, and Dunedin CFR Part 511,1 hereby appoint Industry Samoa. ' varieties shall be subject to the 1 3 ^ Committee No. 73-A for the leather, Whenever any industry committee Pound net weight requirement speci­ leather goods, and related products in­ finds that a higher minimum wage may fied in § 915.305(b) ( 1) (v ii). dustry in Puerto Rico (as defined in 29 be determined for employees engaged in After such amendment said subdivi­ C FR 602.1); and Industry Committee No. certain activities or in the manufacture sion would read as follows: 73-B for the fabric and leather glove in­ of certain products in an industry than dustry in Puerto Rico (as defined in 29 may be determined for other employees fail) With respect to the containers C F R 603.1). in that industry, the committee* shall ^ subdivision (ii) through Pursuant to section 8 of the Fair Labor recommend such reasonable classifica­ m .“us subparagraph, all avocados Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 208), tions within that industry as it deter­ iVTT ? such containers shall be placed Reorganization Plan No. 6 of 1950 (3 mines to be necessary for the purpose of rrfnu6* ayer ordy and the net weight C FR 1949-53 Comp., p. *1004), and 29 fixing for each classification the highest nJH Pollock» Simmonds, Hardee, CFR Part 511,1 hereby: minimum wage rate that can be deter­ t w * Peterson, W aldin, Pinelli, (a) Convene each of the above- mined for it under the principles set forth Puage, Booth 8, Black Prince, Blair, appointed industry committees; herein which will not give a competitive f S ^ 00^110, Collinson, Lula, Booth (b) Refer to each of these industry advantage to any group in the industry. li' ^Simpson, Vaca, Avon, Booth committees the following: No classification shall be made, however, m^n Sr ’ Wlnslowson- Choquette, H er- (1) The question of the minimum rateand no minimum wage rate shall be fixed S T a v w T ’ Aiax. (Booth T-B), Booth or rates of wages to be fixed for the in­ solely on a regional basis or on the basis Schmidt ’ Byars> Linda, Nabal, Wagner, dustry with which it is concerned for of age or sex. In determining whether rine NiritZa“i?a’ Dr- DuPuis, Kathe- employees who are engaged in commerce there should be classifications within an Nelson Bue> Sherman, Marcus, or in the production of goods for com­ industry, in makipg such classifications, and • ?bica’ Murphy, Leona, merce, and (2) the question of the mini­ and in determining the minimum wage such coni?1 vanetles of avocados in any mum rate or rates of wages to be fixed rates for such classifications, each indus­ i 3 ? 2 r r ,shai1 be not iess tha^ for any employees covered by the Act by try committee shall consider, among o t h e r ^ S the net wei^ht of aU reason of the Fair Labor Standards other relevant factors, the following: (1) Stainer ?hfii°f uavocados in any such Amendments of 1961; Competitive conditions as affected by Pounds less than 13 (c) Give notice of the hearing to be transportation, living, and production PercentPercent, h ThatTnat not to * ° exceed exceei 5 held by each of them at the times and costs; (2) wages established for work of a n y of such containers xu.in places indicated below. Each industry like or comparable character by collective Weight requirementmeet SU° h applicable committee shall investigate conditions in labor agreements negotiated between All rvvw its industry, and each industry commit­ employers and employees by representa­ ten data80^™ ^ 10 des*re to submit w rit- tee, or any authorized subcommittee tives of their own choosing; and (3) nection « ° / arguments in con- thereof, shall hear such witnesses and wages paid for work of like or comparable receive such evidence as may be neces­ character by employers who voluntarily fiie the same““me, 111 i™ afor?said __Proposal_____ ... shall sary or appropriate to enable the com­ maintain minimum wage standards in mittee to perform its duties and functions the industry. Jading Washi Jf12, Administration under the aforementioned Act. The Administrator shall prepare eco­ D C > 20250, not Industry Committee No. 73-A shall nomic reports for the industry commit­ eation of this n i t ^ day the publi­ meet in executive session to commence tees containing such data as he is able its investigation at 10:00 a.m. on M ay 17, cs*. All S t 06 in the PLURAL R eg- to assemble pertinent to the matters re­ Pursuant t o ^ t h ^ n .submissions made 1965, in the office of the W age and Hour ferred to them. Copies of each such and Public Contracts Divisions, United No. 57 notice wm h® made report may be obtained at the Washing- 3883 3884 PROPOSED RULE MAKING ton, D.C., and Puerto Rican offices of the 324° bearings from the Garden City RBN, to realign and extend this airway from Mon- Wage and Hour and Public Contracts extending from the 15-mile radius area to 13 roe via El Dorado, Ark., Hot Springs, Ark. Divisions as soon as they are completed miles NW of the RBN. the intersection of the Hot Springs 358° and and prior to the hearings. Each indus­ Harrison 176° True radials, Harrison, Ark., to Interested persons may submit written Springfield, Mo., including a west alternate try committee shall take official notice of data, views, or arguments in the manner from Hot Springs to Springfield via Fayette­ the facts stated in the economic reports recited in the initial notice. All com­ ville excluding the airspace between the to the extent that they are not refuted munications concerning the initial no­ main airway and the west alternate. at the hearings. tice, as amended by this supplemental 4. Victor 74 is designated, in part, from The procedure of these industry com­ notice, received within 45 days after the Fort Smith to Little Rock, Ark., including a mittees is governed by 29 CFR Part 511. publication of this supplemental notice north alternate. It is proposed to designate As a prerequisite to participation in the a south alternate to this segment of Victor will be considered. 74 via the Fort Smith 133° and Little Rook hearings, interested persons shall file pre- This amendment is proposed under the 278° True radials. hearing statements containing the data authority of section 307(a), of the Fed­ 5. Victor 140 is designated, in part, from specified in 29 CFR 511.8 not later than eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. Fayetteville, via Flippin, to Walnut Ridge, M ay 7, 1965. 1348). Ark. It is proposed to redesignate this seg­ ment from Fayetteville, via Harrison, to Wal­ Signed at Washington, D.C., this 18th Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on March nut Ridge. day of March 1965. 12,1965. 6. Victor 205 is designated, in part, from W . W illar d W ir t z , H e n r y L. N e w m a n , Springfield to Blue Springs, Mo. It is pro­ Secretary of Labor. Acting Director, Central Region. posed to extend this segment of Victor 205 from Springfield, via Dogwood, Mo., to Wal­ [F.R. Doc. 65-3061; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; [F.R. Doc. 65-3039; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; nut Ridge, Ark. 8:47 a.m.] 8:45 a.m.] 7. It is proposed to designate Victor 303 from Hot Springs to Fort Smith, including E 14 CFR Part 71 ] an east alternate via the intersection of the Hot Springs 335° and Fort Smith 096° True [Airspace Docket No. 64-SW-47] radials. ATC approval would be required FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY prior to use of the segment of the main air­ [ 14 CFR Part 71 ] FEDERAL AIRWAYS way within Restricted Areas R-2401 and R—2402. [Airspace Docket No. 64-CE-97] Proposed Alteration and Designation 8. it is proposed to designate Victor 305 CONTROL ZONE, TRANSITION AREA, The Federal Aviation Agency is con­ from El Dorado direct to Little Rock. AND CONTROL AREA EXTENSION sidering amendments to Part 71 of the The alteration of Victor 13 west alter­ Federal Aviation Regulations that would nate would provide a bypass airway Proposed Alteration, Designation, alter VOR Federal airways Nos. 13, 54, around the Fort Smith terminal area and Revocation; Supplemental 71, 140, 74, and 205, designate a new and permit unrestricted operations be­ Notice airway between Hot Springs, Ark., and tween Page and Fayetteville when opera­ Fort Smith, Ark., and that would desig­ tions are being conducted in Restricted A notice of proposed rule making, to nate a new airway between El Dorado, Area R-2401. The alteration of Victor alter the controlled airspace in the Ark., and Little Rock, Ark. 54 north alternate would reduce the air­ Garden City, Kans., terminal area, was Interested persons may participate in way mileage between Texarkana and published in the F ederal R eg ister on the proposed rule making by submitting Little Rock via this airway and the in­ January 8, 1965 (30 F.R. 227). Subse­ such written data, views, or arguments clusion of the Hot Springs VOR in the quent to the publication, two VOR-DM E as they may desire. Communications airway structure would provide better approach procedures were developed for should identify the airspace docket num­ navigational guidance. The alteration use at Garden City, Kans. Therefore, ber and be submitted in triplicate to the d£ Victor 71 would provide a connecting the Federal Aviation Agency, having Director, Southwest Region, Attention: airway between Baton Rouge, La., and completed a comprehensive review of the Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avia­ Springfield with connecting airways from terminal airspace requirements at tion Agency, Posit‘Office Box 1689, Fort Hot Springs to Fayetteville and from Hot Garden City, Kans., has determined that Worth, Tex., 76101. All communications Springs to Fort Smith. In addition, tne the following amendment to the above- received within#45 days after publication alteration of Victor 71 and the designa­ cited notice of proposed rule making is of this notice in the F ederal R egister tion of the west alternate would r^we necessary to provide additional control­ will be considered before action is taken the airway mileage between Little Koca led airspace to protect aircraft execut­ on the proposed amendments. The pro­ and Springfield and between Little hoc ing the two new approach procedures; posals contained in this notice may be and Fayetteville. The south alter _ 1. The redesignation of the Garden changed in the light of comments re­ to Victor 74 would be used by air tram City, Kans., cpntrol zone is amended to ceived. control for altitude changes of aircra» read: An official docket will be available for operating between Fort Smith and Within a 5-mile radius of the Garden City examination by interested persons at the Rock. The realignment of Victor Airport (latitude 37°56'09" N., longitude Federal Aviation Agency, Office of the would reduce the route 100°43'47" W .), and within 2 miles each side General Counsel, Attention: Rules Harrison and Little Rock. The- of the 144° bearing from the Garden City Docket, 800 Independence Avenue SW., sion of Victor 205 would provide a RBN, extending from the 5-mile radius zone Washington, D.C., 20553. An informal electing airway between ’ ate to N W to the RBN, and within 2 miles each side docket also will be available for exami­ and Springfield. The east alt® ijte d of the Garden City VORTAC 004° and 171° Victor 303 would P ^ f e unres n ^ nation at the office of the Regional Air radials, extending from the 5-mile radius operations between Hot Sp being zone to 8 miles N and S of the VORTAC. Traffic Division Chief. The Agency proposes, herein, the fol­ Port Smith when operations ar D ^ 2. The designation of the Garden City, lowing airspace actions: conducted in Restricted Ar 305 Kans., transition ^,rea is amended to and R—2402. Designation of Victo ^ read: 1. Victor 13 west alternate is designated, in would reduce the airway m ^ ■ part, from Page, Okla., to Fort Smith, Ark. tween El Dorado and Little R o c ^ ^ That airspace extending upward from 700 It is proposed to realign and extend this are certified permanent au-cajner er feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius west alternate from Page to Fayetteville, Ark., of the Garden City Airport (latitude 37°56'- via the intersection of the Page 007“ and These amendments are ^ the 09” N., longitude 100°43'47” W .), within 5 Fayetteville 203 ° True radials. the authority of section 30 u S c. miles E and 8 miles W of the Garden City 2. Victor 54 north alternate is designated, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 VORTAC 004° and 184° radials, extending in part, from Texarkana, Ark., to Little Rock, from 7 miles S to l^miles N of the VORTAC, Ark., via the intersection of the Texarkana Issued in Washington, D.C., on Mar<* and within 2 miles each side of the Garden 033° and Little Rock 255° True radials. It is proposed to realign this north alternate City VORTAC 171° radial, extending from 18’ 1965> D a n ie l E. Barrow, from Texarkana to Little Rock, via the inter­ the 6-mile radius area to 9 miles S of the Chief, Airspace section of the Texarkana 037° and Hot VORTAC; and that airspace extending up­ Springs 223° True radials, and Hot Springs. and Procedures Div» ward from 1,200 feet above the surface within 3. Victor 71 is designated, in part, from IFR , DOC. 65-3040; Filed, Mar. 2 , a 15-mile radius of the Garden City VORTAC Natchez, Miss., to Monroe, La., and from Flip- and within 5 miles NE and 8 miles SW of the pin, Ark., to Springfield, Mo. It is proposed Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3885

[ 14 CFR Part 71 1 may desire. Communications should be changed in the light of comments re­ submitted in triplicate to the Director, ceived. [Airspace Docket No. 65—CE—31 ] Central Region, Attn.: Chief, Air Traffic An official docket will be available for TRANSITION AREA Division, Federal Aviation Agency, 4825 examination by interested persons at the Troost Avenue, Kansas City, Mo., 64110. Federal Aviation Agency, Office of the Proposed Designation All communications received within 45 General Counsel, Attention: Rules Dock­ The Federal Aviation Agency is con­ days after publication of this notice in et, 800 Independence Avenue SW ., W ash ­ sidering an amendment to Part 71 of the the F ederal R eg ister will be considered ington, D.C. An informal docket also Federal Aviation Regulations which before action is taken on the proposed will be available for examination at the would designate controlled airspace in amendment. No public hearing is con­ office of the Regional A ir Traffic Division the Brookings, S. Dak., terminal area. templated at this time, but arrangements Chief. Presently there is no designated con­ for informal conferences with Federal The United States Air Force has re­ trolled airspace in the Brookings, S. Dak., Aviation Agency officials may be made by quested the alteration of R-2202 Big terminal area. contacting the Regional Air Traffic Divi­ Delta, Alaska, to R-2202A Big Delta, The Federal Aviation Agency, having sion Chief. Any data, views, or argu­ Alaska, and the designation of R-2202B completed a comprehensive review of the ments presented during such conferences at Big Delta, Alaska, as follows: terminal airspace structural require­ must also be submitted in writing in ac­ R-2202B B ig D elta, Alaska ments in the Brookings terminal area, cordance with this notice in order to become part of the record for considera­ Boundaries. Beginning at latitude 64° 04'- including studies attendant to the im­ 30" N„ longitude 146°49'00" W.; to latitude tion. The proposal contained in this plementation of the provisions of Amend­ 64°19'50" N., longitude 147°34'00" W.; to ments 60-21 (26 F.R. 570) and 60-29 (27 notice may be changed in the light of latitude 64°24'40" N., longitude 147°25'35" F.R. 4012) of Part 60 of the Civil Air comments received. W.; to latitude 64°10'45" N., longitude Regulations, proposes to take the follow­ The public docket will be available 146°45'15" W.; thence along the east bank ing airspace action: Designate a transi­ for examination by interested persons of the Little Delta River to the point of tion area in the Brookings, S. Dak., ter­ in the office of the Regional Counsel, beginning. Designated, altitudes. Surface to 5,000 feet minal area to comprise that airspace ex­ Federal Aviation Agency, 4825 Troost Avenue, Kansas City, Mo., 64110. above ground level. tending upward from 700 feet above the tim e of designation. 0900 to 1700 hours, surface within a 5-mile radius of Brook­ This amendment is proposed under the local time, daily. ings, S. Dak. Municipal Airport (latitude authority of section 307(a) .of the Fed­ Controlling agency. Federal Aviation 44° 18'12" N., longitude 96°48'40" W . ) ; eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. Agency, Fairbanks ARTC Center. and within 8 miles N E and 5 miles S W of 1348). Using agency. Commander, .Alaskan Air Command, Elmendorf AFB, Alaska. the 139° bearing from Brookings M unic­ Issued at Kansas City, Mo., on March ipal Airport extending from the airport 16, 1965. The Alaskan Air Command has advised to 12 miles SE of the airport; and with­ H e n r y L. N e w m a n , that Restricted Area R-2202B, as pro­ in 5 miles NE and 8 miles S W of the 299° Acting Director, Central Region. posed, is needed by the Commander, bearing from Brookings Municipal Air­ Alaskan Air Command, Elmendorf AFB, port extending from the airport to 12 [F.R. Doc. 65-3041; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; Alaska, for a portion of an aircraft 8:45 a.m.] miles NW of the airport. weapons delivery range. The impact The proposed transition area would area of the weapons delivery range would Provide controlled airspace for aircraft be within the presently designated R~ executing the prescribed special instru­ I 14 CFR Parts 71, 73 1 2202. The Alaskan Air Command stated ment approach procedures for Brookings [Airspace Docket No. 65-AL-l] that aircraft operated in the approach f™nipal -^rport during their descent to the target area cannot be conducted in w 700 feet above the surface. It would RESTRICTED AREA accordance with “see and avoid” concepts iso provid® controlled airspace for de- because the aircraft will be operating parting aircraft at Brookings during Proposed Alteration close to sonic speed and the pilot’s at­ climb *rom TOO feet above the sur- tention must be directed constantly to The Federal Aviation Agency is con­ J? 1>200 feet above the surface. instrument and electronic systems of the sidering amendments to Parts 71 and 73 w ° ° rs Jof the airways which would aircraft. R-2202B, as proposed, would of the Federal Aviation Regulations that Woerse the transition area proposed be designated as joint-use and would would alter Restricted Area R-2202 at witwu automatically coincide provide airspace for segregation of this Big Delta, Alaska, designate an addi­ the floor of the transition area. portion of the activity from other air tional restricted area at Big Delta and spHK^ain minor revisions to the pre- traffic. R-2202A would have the same alter the continental control area. DrnroH, special instrument approach airspace boundaries as the presently des­ Interested persons may participate in tion X \ * ould 1)6 effected in conjunc- ignated R-2202. the proposed rule making by submitting but nnl e ^etions proposed herein, Section 71.151 would also be amended such written data, views, or arguments i n l ° S tlonal comPlexity would n o t be by changing R-2202 Big Delta, Alaska, as they may desire. Communications ancp n* nor would aircraft perform - to R-2202A Big Delta, Alaska. should identify the airspace docket num­ These amendments are proposed under ^erselyPaeffeS;ted1.andinS minimums be ber and be submitted in triplicate to the Director, Alaskan Region, Attention: section 307(a) of the Federal Aviation cedures^thft ,of the chanses to pro- Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avia­ Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348). examinpH^ Would be required may be tion Agency, 632 Sixth Avenue, Anchor­ Issued in Washington, D.C., on March sp % eS «b v Contacting the Chief, A ir- age, Alaska, 99501. All communications 18,1965. traT £ l Ch’^Air Trafflc ^vision, Cen- 4825 Tronqf’ APederal Aviation Agency, received within 45 days after publication D a n ie l E. B a r r o w , 64110. 0 t Avenue» Kansas City, Mo., of this notice in the F ederal R egister Chief, Airspace Regulations will be considered before action is taken and Procedures Division. Written^to Persons may submit such on the proposed amendments. The pro­ [F.R. Doc. 65-3042; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; a, views, or arguments as they posals contained in this notice fhay be 8:45 a.m.]

V Notices

The Authorized officer of the Bureau Patent to the land issued under the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE of Land Management will undertake such Act of September 19, 1964, supra, shall investigations .as are necessary to de­ contain a reservation to the United States Immigration and Naturalization termine the existing and potential de­ of all mineral deposits, which shall there­ Service mand for the lands and their resources. upon be withdrawn from appropriation STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION He will also undertake negotiations with under the public land laws, including the the applicant agency with the view of mining and mineral leasing laws. The Ports of Entry; Los Angeles, Calif. adjusting the application to reduce the. patent may contain such reservations area to the minimum essential to meet and reasonable restrictions as are neces­ Effective upon publication in the F ed­ the applicant’s needs, to provide for the sary in the public interest, but no restric­ eral R egister, the following amendment maximum concurrent utilization of the tion to insure proper development of the to the Statement of Organization of the lands for purposes other than the appli­ lands after they have passed from Fed­ Immigration and Naturalization Service cant’s, to eliminate lands needed for pur­ eral ownership shall be imposed. (19 F.R. 8071, December 8, 1954), .as poses more essential than the appli­ amended, is prescribed: D ouglas E. H enriques, cant’s, and to reach agreement on the L a n d Office Manager. District No. 16 of subparagraph (2) concurrent management of the lands and Ports of entry for aliens arriving by ves­ their resources; [F.R. Doc. 65-3063; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; sel o f by land transportation of para­ He will also prepare a report for con­ 8:47 a.m.] graph (c) Sub-offices of sec. 1.51 Field sideration by the Secretary of the In­ Service is amended to read as follows: terior who will determine whether or not [Classification 135] District N o . 16— Los Angeles, Calif. the lands will be withdrawn as requested ALASKA CLASS A by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The determination of the Secretary on Small Tract Classification; Correction ♦Andrade, Calif.' the application will be published in the ♦Calexico, Calif. M arch 18,1965. ♦San. Diego, Calif. F ederal R eg ister . A separate notice ♦San Luis Obispo, Calif. will be sent to each interested party of Small Tract Classification No. 135 as (tlxe port o f San. Luis Obispo includes, record. submitted and published as F.R. Doc- 65- among others, the port facilities at Avila, If circumstances warrant it, a public 2242, in Volume 30, No. 42, on March 4, Estero Bay, El Capitan, Elwood, Gaviota, hearing will be held at a convenient time 1965 (30 F.R. 2825), contained an error Morro Bay, and Santa Barbara, Calif.) and place which will be announced. in the land description. „ _ Los Angeles, Calif. ’ The lands involved in the application The land description under T. 13 N., R. (the port of Los Angeles includes, among others, the port facilities at San Pedro, are: 3 W., S.M., should have read, “NE^- Long Beach, Port Hueneme, and Ventura, New Mexico Principal Meridian NEy4, S 1/2N E 1/4) E 1/2SE 1/4NW 1/4, n e >/4- Calif.) NEW MEXICO swy4, and S E & .” ♦San Ysidro, Calif. James W. Scott, ♦Tecate, Calif. T. 23 N., R. 9 W., Sec. 31, N W & N W ^ N W ^ S W ^ . Manager, Anchorage District Dated: M arch 19,1965. and Land Office. ___ The area described contain^ 2.5 acres. R a y m o n d F. F arrell, [F.R. Doc. 65-3072; Filed, Mar. 24, 1966; Commissioner of M ic h a e l T. S o l a n , . 8:48 a.m.] Immigration and Naturalization. - Manager. [F.R. Doc. 65-3071; Piled, Mar. 24, 1965; [F.R. Doc. 65-3062; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; 8:48 a.m.] 8:47 a.m.] ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

[Oregon 016292] PLUTONIUM AND URANIUM DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OREGON ENRICHED IN U-233 Bureau of Land Management Notice of Offering of Land for Sale Guaranteed Purchase Prices NEW MEXICO M ar ch 18, 1965. eneral. 1. The United States Atomic Notice is hereby given that, under the rgy Commission (the AEC) h s notice of the estabhshment of gu Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and provisions of the Act of September 19, Reservation of Lands 1984 (78 Stat. 988), and pursuant to an eed purchase prices for p-nr]Ched application from the City of Boardman, ed plutonium and uranium . M ar c h 19, 1965. he isotope 233 pursuant to sect o^ Oreg., the Secretary of the Interior will The Bureau of Indian Affairs has filed offer for sale the NE^SEVi section 8, ind 58 of the A tonne Energy M an application Serial Number New Mexi­ T. 4 N„ R. 25 E., W.M., Oregon. i, as amended (the Act) . .■ co 0556211, for the withdrawal of the The land has been classified as chiefly lands described below, from all forms of 68 a ^ plZ J ° - P TTt233Ud2live?ed to the valuable for residential use, and it has n enriched in U-233 deiive guch appropriation including the general been determined that the lands are re­ ) prior to January clear mining and the-mineral leasing laws. ierials (a ) are produced m a n ^ The applicant desires to add the location quired for orderly growth and develop­ ment of the City of Boardman. The land :tor by a person Droduced of a water well to the Kimbeto School £ 104 of the Act, (b) ? ma. in Kimbeto, N. Mex. is situated within the city limits of the >ugh the use of special nudear^ ^ City of Boardman. Zoning regulations For a period of 30 days from the date al which was leased or ^ ¿ct, of publication of this notice, all persons permitting limited residential use of the ) pursuant to section ®3 herein- who wish to submit comments, sugges­ land were enacted by the City of Board- (c) meet specifications giv n ^ ^ tions, or objections in connection with man in an Ordinance dated December 30, ;onium or uranium enne _ crjteria the proposed withdrawal may present 1964. ¡t meet all of the folio ton|etermine their views in writing to the undersigned It is the intention of the Secretary to rder for the Commission to de ^ officer of the Bureau of Land Manage­ enter into an agreement with the City t such material meets the red ment, Department of the Interior, Man­ of Boardman-to permit the City to pur­ it of (b ) above: . been pro- ager, Land Office, Post Office Box 1449, chase the land at the appraised fair > _ Such * * * & £ % £ L , t w S l* Santa Fe, N. Mex., 87501. market value. 3886 Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3887 have gone critical without the presence enriched in U-233 is recycled as a re­ or sold material, as the case may be, and of special nuclear material, actor fuel, including such costs associ­ handled in accordance with provisions of (Ü) At all times when any such m a­ ated with the alpha activity of U-233 and the lease or sale agreement. terial or a radioactive precursor (e.g., the gamma activity of daughters of 6. When U-233 eligible for guaranteed protactinium-233) is contained in any U-232.) purchase is delivered to the AEC mixed with uranium enriched or depleted in nuclear reactor, all other special nuclear Parts of U-232 per material present in that reactor must million parts of Deduction in U-235 which was leased or sold by the have been leased or sold by the AEC pur­ total uranium dollars per gram AEC, the AEC will accept the mixture, suant to section 53 of the Act or produced enriched in U-233: of total uranium will pay for the eligible U-233 in accord­ in a nuclear reactor by a person licensed 0-..______—— ______0.40 ance with the guaranteed purchase price under section 104 of the Act and meet­ 20______...... 0.60 obtained by application of subparagraph ______0.80 ing these criteria, and 45__ 1—...... - 3(c) of this notice, and 80______1.00 (iii) Such material may be mixed with (i) W here the contained U-235 is from 130______1.20 leased material, the AEC will treat the other plutonium or uranium, as the case 190______1.40 may be, only if the latter had been leased 250______1. 50 leased portion as having been delivered or sold by the AEC pursuant to section 350______1.60 to the AEC under the applicable lease 53 of the Act, 500______1.70 agreement and will make an appropriate 700______— ______1.80 adjustment to the lessee’s lease account Provided, however, That amounts of m a­ 1000____^______1.90 with the AEC, or terial which the AEC deems to be trivial 1500 and above. ______2. 00 (ii) Where the contained U-235 is (as the AEC might, for example, in the from sold material, the AEC will return case of fission counters or. of admixed For U-232 assays not specifically listed, uranium enriched or depleted in U-235 portions of a small residue from previous the deductions per gram of total urani­ of equivalent value, unless other ar­ processing in the same facility) may be um are determined by linear interpola­ rangements have been made pursuant disregarded in determining whether the tion between the nearest listed assays. to section 53c(3) of the Act or other material is eligible for guaranteed pur­ (c) Subtract the total deduction for authority of the AEC. chase under section 56 of the Act. handling costs computed by (b ) above Criterion (ii) above shall not be inter- from the in-reactor value of the con­ With regard to the adjustment in (i) preted as denying purchase of material tained U-233 computed from (a) above above and the equivalent value in (ii) because of the presence ifi a reactor of and divide the result by the grams of above, the contained U-235 shall be certain fuel elements owned by the AEC contained U-233 to obtain the guaran­ valued by multiplying the number of and being irradiated under contractual teed purchase price for uranium en­ grams of U-235 by the base charge per arrangements between the AEC and the riched in U-233 in dollars per gram of gram of U-235 calculated from subpara­ licensee. Such arrangements will pro­ contained U-233 for that material. graph 3(a) of this notice. Unless other­ vide appropriate and equitable terms to 4. The AEC has determined that the wise agreed by the AE C and the licensee, reflect the contribution of /the A E C - above guaranteed purchase prices are on uranium returned to a licensee under (ii) owned material to the overall reactor a nondiscriminatory basis and do not above shall have a weight fraction of Performance. exceed the estimated value of these ma­ U-235 equal to the weight fraction cal­ Guaranteed purchase prices. 2. The terials as fuel in nuclear reactors. The culated by the first sentence of subpara­ guaranteed purchase price fo r plutonium AEC has made this determination with graph 3(a) but not to exceed 0.90. Such shall be $io per gram of the contained relation to the present schedule of returned material shall be treated as ma­ Plutonium isotopes Pu-239 and Pu-241 charges for uranium enriched in the iso­ terial sold by the AEC pursuant to sec­ in material meeting AEC chemical and tope 235. If that schedule is revised by tion 53 of the Act and shall be in stand­ Physical specifications given in para­ the AEC within the term of applicability ard form, shall meet AEC specifications, graph 7 below. of the above guaranteed purchase prices, shall be valued in accordance with the J' guaranteed purchase price fc the price of $10 per gram of Pu-239 plus AEC schedule of base charges then in ef­ uranium enriched in U-233 in materif Pu-241 and the in-reactor value of $14 fect for uranium enriched or depleted in per gram of uranium highly enriched in 4. che“ ical and physics U-235, and shall be subject to charges w u«u0ns given in Paragraph 7 be U-233 given above shall be multiplied by for withdrawal, packaging, and special ** determined by the followin the ratio of the base charge in such re­ services. in vf^ire‘ ^hrs price is based on a vised schedule in dollars per kilogram of Specifications. 7. The specifications rJ alue for uranium highly en uranium containing a weight fraction of for plutonium and uranium enriched in U-235 of 0.90 to $10,808 (the base charge tainprt tt find the charg nearest cent using uniform rounding trate solution or in dioxide or as metal chared 0f uranium and thence tb practice. The ratio of 14:12 for the in­ or in such additional forms as AEC may reactor values of highly enriched U-233 schedulp^/vf111 ° f u "235 f rom the A E specify from time to time. The AEC may for UTJLof base b a r g e s then in effec and U-235 given above will not change, accept material not meeting the appli­ during the guaranteed purchase period U-235 ?TTi u enricthed or depleted i cable specifications and may, in such 0.9o u‘ i f the weight fraction exceed prior to January 1, 1971, as a result of case, make a charge for the processing any change in the AEC schedule of 14/12 Of !P \ Charge fo r °-90-> Multip] of such material to bring it into con­ charges for uranium enriched in U-235. erams bytbenumber c formance with specifications or to cover fee in.rpo« * 3 m tbe mixture to obtai Mixtures of licensee-produced mate­ additional costs associated with using U-233 iTh^°r ,Yalue °t the containe rial with material leased or sold by the material not meeting such specifications. fe-reactor « r,atl° of 44/12 is the ratio c AEC. 5. In cases where licensee-pro­ I (a) For plutonium nitrate: duced plutonium or U-233 is mixed with U'233 and U?235S) highly enriche (1) The plutonium shall be in an plutonium or U-233, respectively, which aqueous nitrate solution, containing be­ total uraninrv, .- IT number liUII1°er ofoi grams c was leased or sold by the AEC pursuant tween 50 and 250 grams of plutonium per iuction f ^ i P i f he mixture by the to Section 53 of the Act, the AEC will liter and having a free nitric acid con­ gram of tntai'ndlln? costs in dollars ] accept delivery for guaranteed purchase centration between 2 and 10 molar as under section 56 of the Act of only the following tablpU^aniUm as given in 1 required to sustain a stable nitrate Cehtrationnffh d?pending on the cc amount of plutonium or the amount of solution. fee total dM ? t U - 232 is°t°Pe, to obts U-233 determined by the AEC to have (2) Total impurities of uranium and deducting for handling coi been produced by the, licensee. The re­ other metals (excluding plutonium iso­ estimatS 2n f 111 «rver handling co mainder of such plutonium or U-233 will topes) shall not exceed 5,000 parts per to be incurred when uranii be considered as continuing to be leased million parts of plutonium. 3888 NOTICES

(3) The residual insoluble in 50 per­ tion of the material in a nuclear reactor cent nitric acid shall not exceed 5,000 and its subsequent history up to the time CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD parts per million parts of plutonium. of delivery of the material to the AEC, [Docket No. 14191; Order E-21925] (4) Entrained organic material shall in order to avoid ambiguities or inade­ not exceed 0.5 percent by volume of the quacies that might delay or prevent ac­ AIR TRAFFIC CONFERENCE OF aqueous nitrate solution. ceptance of the material by the AEC. AMERICA (5) Chloride and sulfate content shall Any such person shall notify the AEC be minimized consistent with the use as soon as feasible prior to initiating pro­ Order Deferring Action on of technical grade chemicals. duction of the material, shall provide an Agreement (6) Gamma plus beta activity from opportunity to the AEC to verify the cir­ fission products shall not exceed 50 mi­ cumstances of production (including the - Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics crocuries per gram of plutonium. fabrication and loading of the fuel in the Board at its office in Washington, D.C., on the 19th day,of March 1965. (b) For plutonium metal: nuclear reactor) and the subsequent Agreement among the members of the (1) The plutonium shall be in the form processing and handling of the material, A ir Traffic Conference of America, of solid metal buttons, free of slag, and at least 90 days prior to the intended Agreement 16874-A5, Docket 14191, reductant, and mold fragments. The delivery of the material to the AEC shall amending standard agent’s ticket and buttons shall weigh 2000 grams plus or furnish the AEC with a statement of the area settlement plan. minus 200 grams. anticipated quantity, physical form, and By Order E-20741, dated April 24,1964, (2) The total plutonium content shall chemical and isotopic composition of the the Board approved, subject to certain be not less than 99.5 percent by weight. material, its source and its general his­ conditions, Agreements CAB 16874 and (3) In any button, gamma plus beta tory up to that time, and the expected 16874-A1 of the members of the Air Traf­ activity from fission products shall not delivery date; this statement shall be fic Conference of America (ATC) estab­ exceed 8 microcuries per gram of pluto­ updated and amplified at the time of de­ lishing a Standard Agent’s Ticket and nium. livery of the material. At any time, the Area Settlément Plan.1 In accordance (c) For uranyl nitrate containing AEC may request and shall be furnished with the Plan, and with ordering para­ uranium enriched in U-233: such additional information as the AEC g r a p h e , 6, and 11 of Order E-20741, the (1) The uranyl nitrate shall be con­ may require to determine whether the carriers have filed a resolution providing tained in an aqueous nitrate solution material meets the requirements and for expansion of the Plan to additional containing between 175 and 225 grams criteria of paragraph 1 above and what bank areas, the schedule therefor, and a of uranium per liter and having a free payment should be made for the ma­ Report of the Interconference Area Set­ nitric acid concentration between 1 and terial. tlement Plan Committee (Report) re­ 3 molar, Contractual arrangements. 11. Any viewing initial experience with the Plan. (2) Nitrate ion shall constitute not person desiring to sell special nuclear The Report indicates that the Plan has less than 98 percent by weight of the material to the AEC pursuant to section been successful in simplifying agents total anions in the solution. Chloride 56 of the Act should either have a chem­ paper work and administrative detail, and sulfate content shall be minimized ical processing contract with the AEC or' that no significant problems have arisen consistent with the use of technical enter into a standard form of purchase regarding the honoring of the standard ■ grade chemicals. contract to be available from the AEC. ticket by the International Air Transport (3) Total metallic impurities (exclud­ Delivery of such material to the AEC Association (IA TA)' that carrier field ing uranium isotopes) shall not exceed shall not be made prior to the execution personnel have been freed from agency 5,000 parts per million parts of total of an appropriate contract by such per­ administration duties, thereby releasing uranium. son and the AEC. time for creative sales, and that the po­ (4) The carbon content shall not ex­ Changes. 12. The specifications given tential improvement in cash flow to tne ceed 200 parts and the phosphorous con­ in paragraph 7 above and the designated airlines, not yet fully realized, should De tent shall not exceed 250 parts, respec­ delivery points given in paragraph 8 reached as area banks perfect procedure tively, per million parts of total uranium. above may be changed at a date six in the light of experience and fannuaniy (5) Gamma plus beta activity from months or more after publication of a with the Plan. The schedule for furtner fission products shall not exceed 10 mi­ notice of such a change in the F ederal implementation is as follows: crocuries per gram of total uranium. R egister. In view of developing tech­ nology and the variety of possible situa­ Specifications for plutonium dioxide and Date (1965) Bank area States tions that may arise, it may be necessary for uranium metal and dioxide contain­ to supplement this notice in the future ing U-233 are being developed and, Arkansas, Colorado, in order to carry out the provisions and Kansas, Lquisiana* when available, will be supplied on the underlying purposes of the Act. Mississippi, 1 request. New Mexico, 0«a- Interpretation. 13. The AEC reserves homa, Texas. Delivery. 8. Delivery of plutonium and the right to interpret this notice, to. de­ Los Angeles/ Arizona, California, uranium enriched in U-233 shall be made June 1_____ Idaho, Nevada, Ore­ termine whether special nuclear material San Fran­ gon, ritah, Washing- f.o.b. the receiving points designated cisco. meets the requirements and criteria of herein unless otherwise agreed by AEC. AL0bUa,FlondajW- paragraph 1 above, and to determine July 1...... Atlanta/ These receiving points are the AEC Miami. gia, North Car0™*:. what payment should be made for such South Carolina, Ten plants at Richland, Wash., for plutonium material. and at Oak Ridge, Tenn., for uranium Correspondence. 14. Any correspond­ Aug. 1------New York-1-. enriched in U-233. Maine,Maryland. ence involving this notice should be ad­ Packaging. 9. The delivered materials dressed, until further notice, to: g a s s e s are to be packaged in containers meeting AEC regulatory and operational criteria. Manager, Savannah. River Operations Office, S ï Æ f e “*' U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Post Office Vermont, Virginia, The AEC will either return privately- Box A, Aiken, S.C. 28902. West Virginia. owned reusable containers to common Sept. 1------Hawaii. carrier at the receiving point or will make Effective date. 15. This notice is ef­ Oct. 1...... Canada. proper adjustments for the value of such fective upon publication in-the F ederal containers. R egister. tie Plan was put ^ effect ^ l, Information required. 10. Any person Dated at Washington, D.C., this 19th ed in the State of I1^ lning 12 mid- desiring to sell special nuclear material and extended to the ¿Isignated day of March 1965. >rn states in the initially desig to the AEC pursuant to section 56 of the area on Dec. 1, 1964. g me®" Act is responsible for supplying data For the Atomic Energy Commission. tie Committee is composed it demonstrating that the requirements and 2 from each of the follow !^ (6oUl R. E. H ollingsworth , criteria of paragraph 1 above have been Ticketing and ¿count- General Manager. ^ g ^ A g met and, for this purpose, shall maintain ; Data Processing, Eevenu and Passenger (both Airline* P and make available to the AEC a clear [P.R. Doc. 65-3027; Piled, Mar. 24, 1965; record of the circumstances of produc­ 8:45 a.m.] Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3889

The Report states that further analysis restored to the Agent only when the returned nate the possible problems giving rise to of experience in the Illinois and Dallas check has been made good. the mentioned condition.8 bank areas may indicate the desirability Heretofore, comparable provisions The agreement contains other minor of reducing bank area size, resulting in have referred only to checks dishonored modifications, for example, a new sec­ some possible change in the timetable.8 because of insufficient funds. The tion I W defining the term “ticket forms Upon review of the resolution and ac­ change appears reasonable in the light of and exchange orders” as used in the Plan companying Report, the Board believes otherwise liberalized provisions of the to include, “unless the context otherwise that the Plan should be further imple­ resolution, e.g., the opportunity for an requires, * * * miscellaneous charges mented in the manner contemplated. agent to provide a certified check before orders, tour orders, and/or such other ac­ There appear to exist, I however, certain airline identification plates and standard countable forms as the Secretary— AFAC difficulties which the carriers obviously ticket stocks are withdrawn. may from time to time be authorized to have recognized and, for the most part, Similarly, the Report indicates that supply to Agents for issuance to the dealt with. the carriers have been concerned over Agents’ clients.” Thus, the Report indicates that, al­ ticket imprinter breakdowns, and have In line with the foregoing, the Board though the intended policy was to absorb adopted a procedure under which the has concluded, tentatively, that the small overages and shortages in agency Executive Secretary may temporarily agreement merits approval. However, in remittances into an operating account, authorize alternate methods of drawing order to permit submission of pertinent some agents were inadvertently billed, up a standard ticket when the machine data relative to any of the foregoing, and leading to unnecessary friction. To spe­ is inoperative. In addition, the manu­ comments of any interested persons, we cifically cover this type of situation, as facturer has reengineered the machine shall defer final action for a suitable well as agency reporting errors generally, and is rewriting the operating instruc­ period. the instant agreement contains a new tions to minimize the risk of mishandling Accordingly, it is ordered, section VIIH;4 this section, it will be by the operator.6 1. That action on Agreement CAB noted, formally grants the Executive Ordering paragraph 12 of Order E- 16874-A5 be and it hereby is deferred; Secretary of ATC a certain degree of 20741 required the carriers, within six and, latitude in prescribing the handling of months of initial implementation of the 2. That any interested person desir­ minor reporting variances. In addition, Plan, to file a resolution under section ing to file comments with respect to this sections VII A 1, 2, and 3 have been 412 of the Act modifying the agency agreement shall file such comments with­ restated in conformance with the basic bonding requirement in line with the re­ in 30 days of the date of service of this Agency Resolution, as amended (e.g. by duction in risk to carrier funds afforded Order. Such comments shall conform Agreement CAB 5044-A104, approved by by the Plan or, in the alternative, a re­ to the general requirements of the Order E-21026), with suitable adjust­ port describing the reasons for not en­ Board’s Rules of Practice in Economic ment for differing grace periods and pro­ acting such a resolution. The carriers Proceedings, and should be submitted in cedures relating to the standard ticket. indicate that the matter of reducing the triplicate to the Board’s Docket Section. There is also introduced a new para­ bond coverage required of agents operat­ graph A4 which provides: This order will be published in the ing under the Plan is being actively con­ F ederal R eg ister . Upon receipt of notice that the check sent sidered by ATC, and that the matter will an area bank by an Agent as his remit­ be covered by a separate filing in the near By the Civil Aeronautics Board. tance has been dishonored by the drawee future.® [ s e a l ] H arold R . S a n d e r s o n , ., ’ the Executive Secretary shall immedi- In addition to the original Plan as ap­ Secretary. Mely notify the Secretary— AFAC, all mem- proved by Order E-20741, the carriers [F.R. Doc. 65-3079; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; a«,.«* 0 bave appointed the Agent and the have adopted subsequent amendments atja °n the Agent’s bond. The Secretary— 8:48 a.m.] C shaU forthwith, unless the Agent pro- occasioning certain further conditions in es a certified check to cover the returned the Board’s orders of approval.7 The from the Agent all airline carriers appear to have complied with J? “cation plates, and all ticket forms and these conditions. Thus, for example, O r­ FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION nge orders supplied by him to the der E-21497 required that an agent’s “gan, such plates, forms and orders to be Sales Agency Agreement not be subject R. W. SMITH & CO. ET AL. to termination by the ATC because of Notice of Agreements Subject to b p l^ RepUblic National Bank of Dallas 1: the agent’s failure to execute an amend­ State nsignate(i as the area bank for the ment thereto applying the Plan to his Cancellation area ha«IlaS banlt area- The names of otl sales of international air transportation Notice is hereby given that the follow­ Pursuantsbould be submitted to the Boa: ing independent ocean freight forwarder 4 Siailt 40 0rder E-20741. on behalf of an IATA carrier. In re­ inc t w section reads:’ “Upon determi sponse, the members of ATC have given cooperative working agreements ap­ in» , to apparent error in preps to individual concurring IATA carriers proved by the Commission pursuant to check +v,Sales reP°rt of the remittar the responsibility for securing the assent section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as is amount remitted by an Age amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 of their, agents to operating under the the mPmu.or ,less than the amount d U.S.C. 814) are scheduled for cancella­ Plan. This approach appears to elimi- Promptl^remit^n Executive Secretary sh tion; inasmuch as the parties to the WUtheAeent^or+v? eXCCSS to the Agent> agreements have requested in writing II suchhm f the amount of the shorta B Material issued by ATC to agertts in the after th«^T+ remams unsatisfied ten ds Illinois and Dallas bank areas indicates that that the agreements be terminated. the Execntiv/o°n which sent to the Age the ticket imprinter (Addressograph-Multi- Interested parties may inspect and ob­ coriance with ®ecretary shall proceed in s graph Model 12-49) is being offered through tain a copy of the agreements at the t l o r S 0 S“ tlon VH.A.l Of this Resol carrier arrangement at $65.75 plus State and W ashington office of the Federal M ari­ occurrence Secretary shall, with 1 Federal taxes and handling, and that this is time Commission, 1321 H Street NW„ Settlement t>, tbe Tuterconference Ai a substantial reduction below the cost for Room 301. Comments with reference to cedures f0r Committee, develop pi single-unit purchases. Order E-20741 re­ an agreement may be submitted to the Sh°rtages to ~arging minor overages a quired the carriers to file a resolution with Secretary, Federal Maritime Commis­ than remitting o °Perating account rati the Board under section 412 of the Act set­ Provided Thft°r billing same to the Agei ting forth fuU details of the validator (ticket sion, Washington, D.C., 20573, within 20 Preclude' an7 \ SUch Procedures shall i imprinter) program. We shall accept the in­ days after publication of this notice in his request ent from recovering up formation contained in the Report and other lts amount’ for ° v®rage no matter how mil material filed relating to this subject as 8 ATC has reported, to date, that British bribed ’in fh tendin® the ten‘day Peri satisfying this condition of the Board’s order. Overseas Airways Corporation, among IATA “ for I J i 1® second sentence of t: * The six-month period, of course, does not carriers, and Trans Caribbean Airways, Inc., expire Until Apr. 1,1965. among ATC carriers not operating domestic - ~wnon iv T or. review ipurs 7 Agreements CAB 16874—A2, approved by routes, have elected to participate fully in the Agent w h S s h ^ ' of this Resolutton) Order E-21380 dated October 8, 1964; CAB Plan. If there are other such fully partici­ aPPear to be 16874—A3, approved by Order E-21497, No­ pating carriers, ATC should promptly so ad­ repetitive pattern0“ U° US error’ or to 1 vember 12,1964; and CAB 16874-A4 approved vise the Board, pursuant to Orders E-21497 by Order E-21538, Nov. 25^ 1964. and E-21538. 3890 NOTICES the F ederal R e g is t e r . A copy of any regulations under the Natural Gas Act c a n t), W inter Park, Fla., filed in Docket j such statement should also be forwarded (157.10) on or before April 19, 1965. No. CP65-284 an application pursuant to to each of the parties to the agreement J o s e p h H . G u t r id e , section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for I (as indicated hereinafter), and the com­ Secretary. a certificate of public convenience and ments to the Commission should indicate necessity authorizing the construction ; that this has been done. [F.R. Doc. 65-3049; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; and operation of certain natural gas 8:46 ajn .] The parties to each of the following facilities, all as more fully set forth in agreements have requested that it be the application on file with the Commis- ! cancelled in accordance with its terms. [Docket No. CP65-281] sion and open to public inspection. The agreements are between the fol­ EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO. Specifically, Applicant seeks author!- ! lowing forwarding firms: zation for the construction and operation . R. W . Smith & Co., New Orleans 12, Notice of Application of a line tap and approximately 500 feet of 4 y -inch pipe, together with a meter La., and Haras & Co., Jersey City, M a r c h 18, 1965. 2 N.J ____ _1______FF-82 and regulator station, at a point on its J. R. Michels, Inc., Houston, Tex., Take notice that on March 11, 1965, 6-inch Avon Park lateral in Highlands and Brito Forwarding Co., El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Applicant), El County, Fla., for the delivery of up to Brownsville, Tex______FF-949 Paso, Tex., filed in Docket No. CP65-281 2,400 M 2 B.t.u. of natural gas per day and C. S. Greene & Co., Chicago, 111., an application pursuant to section 7(b) up to 650,000 M 2 B.t.u. annually to and Southern Traffic Association, of the Natural Gas Act for permission Sebring Utilities Commission (Sebring), Mobile, Ala— ______FF-967 and approval to-abandon certain natural Sunshine Forwarders, Inc., Jack­ Sebring, Fla. gas facilities, all as more fully set forth The application states that the natural sonville 1, Fla., and J. D. Smith in the application on file with the Com­ Inter-Ocean, Inc., New York, gas involved in the proposed service will N.Y ______FF—1372 mission and open to public inspection. be used by Sebring in its power plant for Arthur J. Fritz & Co., Houston 2, Specifically, Applicant seeks permis­ the production of electricity to be dis­ Tex., and G. E. Posey Corp., Hous­ sion and approval to abandon the Brick- tributed to residential, commercial, and ton 2, Tex______FF—8661 land Meter Station in Dona Ana County, industrial customers in and around the N. Mex., and the Prewitt Meter Station Dated: M arch 22, 1965. City of Sebring, Fla. in McKinley County, N. Mex. Total estimated cost of Applicant’s T h o m a s L i s i , The application states that the above proposed construction is $27,000, and will Secretary. facilities have heretofore been used in be financed with cash on hand. [F R . Doc. 65-3076; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; providing natural gas to El Paso Natural Protests or petitions to intervene may 8:48 a.m.] Gas Products Co. for use in said com­ be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ pany’s Brickland and Prewitt Refineries. sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord­ The application further states that the ance with the rules of practice and pro­ proposed abandonment is sought due to cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION the fact that operations at both facilities regulations under the Natural Gas Act have been discontinued. (157.10) on or before April 19,1965. [Docket No. CP61-163] Protests or petitions to intervene may Take further notice that, pursuant to be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ ARKANSAS LOUISIANA GAS CO. the authority contained in and subject to sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord­ the jurisdiction confererd upon the Fed­ ance with the rules of practice and pro­ Notice of Petition To Further Amend eral Power Commission by sections 7 and cedure (18 C F R 1.8 or 1.10) and the reg­ 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the Com­ M a r c h 19,1965. ulations under the Natural Gas Act mission’s rules of practice and procedure, (157.10) on or before April 16, 1965. Take notice that on March 15, 1965, a hearing will be held without buther Take further notice that, pursuant to Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. (Petitioner), notice before the Commission on tms the authority contained iir and subject Shreveport, La., filed in Docket No. application if no protest or petition ro to the jurisdiction conferred upon the CP61-163 a petition to amend the order intervene is filed within the time requirea Federal Power Commission by sections 7 of the Commission issued in Docket No. herein, and the Commission on its own and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the CP61-143 et al., January 3, 1963, and review of the matter finds that a grant o Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ the certificate is required by^ the P amended December 30, 1963, and June cedure, a hearing will be held without 2, 1964, which order and amendments convenience and necessity. If a P , further notice before the Commission on or petition for leave to intervene u jm w authorized a transaction by which gas this application if no protest or petition sold by Colorado Interstate Gas Co. (Col­ filed, or if the Commission on its ow to intervene is filed within the time re­ motion believes that a formal h ea r»«“ orado) to Petitioner is delivered by quired herein, and the Commission on its Colorado to Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of required, further notice of such h own review of the matter finds that per­ America (Natural) in exchange for gas will be duly given. . „«wided mission and approval for the proposed Under the procedure herein prov delivered by Natural to Petitioner. Pres­ abandonments are required by the pub­ ent authorization extends through April for, Unless otherwise advised, i or lic convenience and necessity.; If a pro­ 30,1965. unnecessary for A p p lican t to app test or petition for leave to intervene is be represented at the hearing. By the instant filing, Petitioner seeks timely filed or if the Commission on its authorization for the extension of the Joseph H. Gutr® * own motion believes that a formal hear­ Secretary- subject transaction through April 30, ing is required, further notice of such 1966, and further authorization to in­ hearing will be duly given. [F R. Doc. 65-3052; Filed, Mar. 24, l965, crease the daily maximum deliveries Under the procedure herein provided 8:46 ajn.] from the 25,000 M cf presently authorized for, unless otherwise advised, it will be to 35,000 Mcf, with no change in the unnecessary for Applicant to appear or [Docket No. CP-282] average daily deliveries of 10,000 Mcf be represented at the hearing. during the period September 1, 1965, HOPE NATURAL GAS CO. through April 30, 1966. J o s e p h H . G u t r id e , Secretary. The petition states that the proposed .Notice of Application amendment is requested pursuant to [F.R. Doc. 65-3051; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; agreements between Petitioner and Col­ 8:46 ajn .] M arch 19,1965^ orado dated February 24, 1965, and be­ ike notice that on- ^ 5ipiiicant). tween Natural, Colorado, and Petitioner [Docket No. CP65-284] 3 Natural c ?*.„ n X e t No. dated M arch 8,1965. FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION CO. ksburg, W. Va.,. filed 1 J J suant to Protests or petitions to intervene may >-282 an application pur . for be filed with the Federal Fower Commis­ Notice of Application on 7(c) of the Natural Gas^ce ^ sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in ac­ M arch 19, 1965. rtificate of .^ b% S e of natura! ssitv authorizing the sa e cordance with the rules of practice and Take notice that on March 15, 1965, procedure (18 C FR 1.8 or 1.10) and the Florida Gas Transmission Co. (Appli­ Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3891 fully set forth in the application on file unnecessary for Applicant to appear or (B) Pending hearings and decisions with the Commission and open to public be represented at the hearing. thereon, the rate supplements herein are suspended and their use deferred until inspection. Joseph H. G tttride, date shown in the “Date Suspended Un­ Specifically, Applicant seeks authori­ Secretary. zation for the sale of approximately til” column, and thereafter until made 45,000 Mcf of natural gas per month to [F.R. Doc. 65-3063; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; effective as prescribed by the Natural 8:46 am .] Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co. G as Act: Provided, however, T hat the (Transco), pursuant to a contract dated supplements to the rate schedules filed January 20,1965, between Applicant, The [Docket No. RI65-544] by Respondents, as set forth herein, shall California Co., and Mississippi River Fuel become effective subject to refund on the Corp., as “seller” and Transco as buyer. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. date and in the manner herein pre­ The application states that the proposed Order Providing for Hearing on and scribed if within 20 days from the date of the issuance of this order Respond­ sale will be made from the Block 23 Suspension of Proposed Changes Field, South Marsh Island Area, G ulf of ents shall each execute and file under its Mexico, at a price of 19 cents per M cf in Rates, and Allowing Rate above-designated docket number with measured at 15.025 p.s.i.a. Changes To Become Effective Sub­ the Secretary of the Commission its Protests or petitions to intervene may ject to Refund 1 agreement and undertaking to comply be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ with the refunding and reporting pro­ M arch 18,1965. sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord­ cedure required by the Natural Gas Act ance with the rules of practice and The Respondents named herein have and § 154.102 of the regulations there­ procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the filed proposed changes in rates and under, accompanied by a certificate regulations under the Natural Gas Act charges of currently effective rate sched­ showing service of copies thereof upon (157.10) on or before April 19,1965. ules for sales of natural gas under Com­ all purchasers under the rate schedule Take further notice that, pursuant to mission jurisdiction, as set forth in Ap­ involved. Unless Respondents are ad­ the authority contained in and subject pendix A hereof. vised to the contrary within 15 days after to the jurisdiction conferred upon the The proposed changed rates and the filing of their respective agreements Federal Power Commission by sections 7 charges may be unjust, unreasonable, and undertakings, such agreements and and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the undully discriminatory, or preferential, undertakings shall be deemed to have Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ or otherwise unlawful. been accepted. cedure, a hearing will be held without The Commission finds: It is in the (C) Until otherwise ordered by the further notice before the Commission public interest and consistent with the Commission, neither the suspended on this application if no protest or p eti-: Natural Gas Act that the Commission supplements, nor the rate schedules tion to intervene is filed within the time enter upon hearings regarding the law­ sought to be altered, shall be changed un­ required herein, and the Commission on fulness of the proposed changes, and til disposition of these proceedings or its own review of the matter finds that a that the supplements herein be suspend­ expiration of the suspension period. grant of the certificate is required by the ed and their use be deferred as ordered (D) Notices of intervention or peti­ tions to intervene may be filed with the public convenience and necessity. I f a below. protest or petition for leave to intervene Federal Power Commission, Washing­ The Commission: orders: (A) Under is timely filed, or if the Commission on ton, D.C., 20426, in accordance with the its own motion believes that a formal the Natural Gas Act, particularly sec­ rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR hearing is required, further notice of tions 4 and 15, the regulations pertain­ 1.8 and 1.37 ( f ) ) on or before M ay 5,1965. such hearing will be duly given. ing thereto (18 CFR, Ch. I ) , and the under the procedure herein provided Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ By the Commission. for, unless otherwise advised, it will be cedure, public hearings shall be held [ seal] Joseph H. G utride, Posed changes. concerning the lawfulness of the pro- Secretary.

A ppendix A

Effective Cents per Mcf Rate in Docket Rate Sup- Amount Date date Date sus- effect sub- No. Respondent sched­ ele­ Purchaser and producing area of annual filing unless pended ject to ule ment increase tendered sus­ . until— Rate in Proposed refund in No. No. pended effect Increased docket rate Nos. RI65-544_ Humble Oil & Re­ 10 23 Texas Eastern Transmission- Corp. $5,043 2-18-05 i 3-21-65 »3-22-65 »15.0 * « 15.75 fining Co., Post (Helen Gohlke Field, DeWitt Coun­ Office Box 2180, ty, Tex.) (R.R. District No. 2). Houston, Tex., 77001. (Helen Oohlke (“A ” Sand) Field, DeWitt County, Tex.) (R.R. Dis­ __ trict No. 2).

’ The susnMirfn 4 is the effective date requested by Respondent, 4 Pressure base is 14.65 p ,s.i.a. • I n S S ’n Peri?d is limited to one day. » Settlement rate. ^Ue *° service charge for maintaining delivery pressure at 1200 p.s.i.g. i Idbiat?silaid Re?ning Co/s Pr° P ° sed ln " cello, EL, filed in Docket No. CP65-286 El., and their environs, all as more fully cabie _ d chafges exceed the appli- an application pursuant to section 7(a) set forth in the application on file with Texas level fOT increased rates In the Comm-°^d district No. 2 as set forth in of the Natural Gas Act for an order of the Commission and open to public icy N o ^ ^ ° n’s state*nent of General Pol- the Commission directing Michigan W is­ inspection. consin Pipe Line Co. (Michigan Wiscon­ Pt. 2, sec°2 56) amended ( 18 CF® . Ch- I, Applicant proposes to construct a total sin) to sell and deliver to Applicant, of 32,6 miles of 2-inch, 3-inch, and 4-inch Doc. 65-3054; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; through eixsting facilities, the natural 8:46 a.m.] pipe, extending to the above communities gas requirements of Applicant for resale and distribution in Altona, Wataga, Rio, from an existing point of delivery from [Docket No. CP65-286] and Oneida, Knox County, El.; North Michigan Wisconsin near New Windsor, ILLINOIS POWER CO. Henderson, Mercer County, El.; and El. Notice of Application Alexis, Mercer, and Warren Counties, Total volumes of natural gas involved to meet Applicant’s annual and peak day T . M arch 19, 1965. requirements for the above communities Diinok S°tice that 011 M arch 15, 1965, 1 Does not consolidate for hearing or dis­ 18 Power Co. (Applicant), M onti- pose of the several matters herein. are stated to be: No. 57------a 3892 NOTICES

The petition states that the proposed ing thereto ( 18 C FR Ch. I ) , and the Com­ First Second Third year year year increase is required in order to enable mission’s rules of practice and proce­ Petitioner to meet the increased require­ dure, a public hearing shall be held con­ ments of Dierks resulting from its recent 67,789 142,138 166,400 cerning the lawfulness of the proposed »63 1,260 1,663 plant expansion. change. Protest or petitions to intervene may (B) Pending hearing and decision be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ thereon, the rate supplement herein is Total estimateci cost of Applicant’s pro­ sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord­ suspended and its use deferred until date posed construction, including transmis­ ance with the rules of practice and pro­ shown in the “Date Suspended Until” sion facilities and distribution systems, cedure (18 C FR 1.8 or 1.10) and the column, and thereafter until made effec­ is $816,930, and will be financed with regulations under the Natural Gas Act tive as prescribed by the Natural Gas funds available for construction pur­ (157.10) on or before April 16, 1965. Act: Provided, however, That the supple­ poses. ment to the rate schedule filed by Re­ Protests or petitions to intervene may J o s e ph H . G tjtride, Secretary. spondent shall become effective subject be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ to refund on the date and in the manner sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord­ [F.R. Doc. 65-3056; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; herein prescribed if within 20 days from 8:46 a.m.] ance with the rules of practice and pro­ the date of the issuance of this order Re­ cedure (18 C F R 1.8 or 1.10) on or before spondent shall execute and file under its April 19,1965. [Docket No. RI65-545] above-designated docket number with J o s e ph H . G u t r id e , the Secretary of the Commission its Secretary. MINERAL MINING CO. ET AL. agreement and undertaking to comply [F.R. Doc. 65-3055; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965f Order Providing for Hearing on and with the refunding and reporting proce­ 8:46 a.m.] Suspension of Proposed Change in dure required by the Natural Gas Act and § 154.102 of the regulations thereunder, Rate, and Allowing Rate Change accompanied by a certificate showing [Docket No. CP64-268] To Become Effective Subject to service of a copy thereof upon the pur­ Refund chaser under the rate schedule involved. LONE STAR GAS CO. M arch 18,1965. Unless Respondent is advised to the con­ Notice of Petition To Amend Respondent named herein has filed trary within 15 days after the filing of its a proposed change in rate and charge of agreement and undertaking, such agree­ M arch 18,1965. a currently effective rate schedule for the ment and undertaking shall be deemed Take notice that on March 11, 1965, sale of natural gas under Commission to have been accepted. Lone Star Gas Co. (Petitioner), Dallas, jurisdiction, as set forth in Appendix (C ) Until otherwise ordered by, the Commission, neither the suspended sup­ Tex., filed in Docket No. CP64-268 a pe­ A below. plement, nor the rate schedule sought tition to amend the order of the Commis­ The proposed changed rate and charge to be altered, shall be changed until dis­ sion issued in said docket August 10, may be unjust, unreasonable, unduly position o f this proceeding or expiration 1964, which order authorized Petitioner discriminatory, or preferential, or other­ of the suspension period. to transport up to 4,740 Mcf of natural wise unlawful. ■(D) Notices of intervention or peti­ gas per day for sale and delivery to The Commission finds: It is in the tions to intervene may be filed the Dierks Forests, Inc. (Dierks), for use in public interest and consistent with the with Federal Power Commission, Washington, Dierks insulation board manufacturing Natural Gas Act that the Commission plant near Broken Bow, Okla. enter upon a hearing regarding the law­ D.C., 20426, in accordance with the rules By the instant filing, Petitioner seeks fulness of the proposed change, and of practice and procedure (18 CFR 18 amendment of said order by requesting that the supplement herein be suspended and 1.37(f) ) on or before May 5,1965. authorization for the transportation of and its use be deferred as ordered below. By the Commission. up to 6,000 Mcf per day for sale and de­ The Commission orders: (A) Under livery to Dierks in lieu of the 4,740 Mcf the Natural Gas Act, particularly sec­ Joseph H. Gutride, Secretary. presently authorized. tions 4 and 15, the regulations pertain­

A ppendix A

Rate in Effective Cents per Mcf effect sub­ Rate Sup­ Amount Date date Datti sus­ ject to Docket Respondent- sched­ ple­ Purchaser and producing area of annual filing unless pended Proposed refund in No. ule ment increase tendered sus­ until— Rate in docket effect increased No. No. pended rate Nos.

8 4 5 14.0 RI65-545... Mineral Mining Co. 2 2 Cities Service Gas Co. (Eureka Field, $33 2-25-65 i 3-28-65 î3-29-65 313.0 (Operator), et al., Alfalfa County, Okla.) (Oklahoma Suite 600, 110 Fast ‘ “Other” Area). Wisconsin Ave., - Milwaukee, Wis.

1 The stated effective date is the first day after expiration'of the required statutory 3 Periodic rate increase. notice. 4 Pressure base is 14.66 p 2 The suspension period is limited to 1 day. 6 Subject to a downward BjLu. adjustment.

Mineral Mining Co. (Operator), et al. that Mineral Mining’s rate filing should be Houston, Tex., filed in Docket ^ section (Mineral Mining) request an effective date of suspended for one day from March 28, 1965, 285 an application pursuant to ^ January 1, 1965, for their proposed rate in­ the date of expiration of the required statu­ 7(c) of the Natural G^s,^ft;^ uS n s crease. Good cause has not been shown for tory notice. mented by § 157.7(c) of_ the ^ pubiiC waiving the 30-day notice requirement pro­ vided in Section 4(d) of the Natural Gas Act [F.R. Doc. 65-3057; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; under the Act, for a certific .horizjng to permit an earlier effective date for Mineral 8:46 a.m.] convenience and necessity certain the construction and operationio c ^ Mining’s rate filing and such request is denied. natural gas facilities, all a with The basic contract of Mineral Mining was [Docket No. CP65-285] set forth in the application0 bjic executed subsequent to September 28, 1960, the Commission and open the date of issuance of the Commission’s TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE CO. Statement of General Policy No. 61-1, as in^ ^ ific a U y , Applicant seeks aut^or^ ' amended (18 CFR, Ch. I, Part 2, Section Notice of Application 2.56), and the proposed rate* is above the tion to construct M ar ch 18, 1965. 1965 and operate eertam n u »5 including applicable area celling for increased rates facilities, - r but below the initial service ceiling for the Take notice that on March 15, 1965, area involved. W e believe, in this situation, Transwestem Pipeline Co. (Applicant), Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3893 the purpose of enabling Applicant to The application states that the fa- sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord­ make various minor sales to customers ■cilities for which authorization is re­ ance with the rules of practice and pro­ along its system. ~ /ÿ -,. - jtotgggi quested will not provide for any increased cedure (18 C F R 1.8 or 1.10) and the The application states that no direct sales volumes under jurisdictional rate regulations under the Natural Gas Act industrial sales will be made pursuant to schedules. (157.10) on or before April 19, 1965. the authorization requested, and fu r­ Total estimated cost of Applicant’s Take further notice that, pursuant to ther states that delivery to any one pur­ proposed construction is not to exceed the authority contained in and -subject chaser through the proposed facilities $500,000, with no single project expendi­ to the jurisdiction conferred upon the will not exceed 100,000 M cf annually and ture to exceed $50,000, and will be fi­ Federal Power Commission by sections 7 will not be used for boiler fuel purposes as nanced with cash on hand, cash gen­ and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the defined by the Commission. erated from operations, internal sources, Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ Total estimated cost of Applicant’s and by means of financing already cedure, a hearing will be held without proposed construction is not to exceed arranged. further notice before the Commission on $150,000, and will be financed with funds Protests or petitions to intervene may this application if no protest or petition on hand. be filed with the Fédéral Power Commis­ to intervene is filed within the time re­ Protests or petitions to intervene may sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord­ quired herein, ánd the Commission on be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ ance with the rules of practice and ‘pro­ its own review of the matter finds that a sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord­ cedure (18 C FR 1.8 or 1.10) and the regu­ grant of the certificate is required by ance with the rules of practice and pro­ lations under the Natural Gas Act the public convenience and necessity. cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the reg­ (157.10) on or before April 19, 1965. If a protest or petition for leave to inter­ ulations under the Natural Gas Act Take further notice that, pursuant to vene is timely filed, or if the Commission (157.10) on or before April 19, 1965. the authority contained in and subject on its own motion believes that a formal Take further notice that, pursuant to to the jurisdiction conferred upon the hearing is required,- further notice of the authority contained in and subject Federal Power Commission by sections 7 such hearing will be duly given. to the jurisdiction conferred upon the and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the Under the procedure herein provided Federal Power Commission by sections 7 Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ for, unless otherwise advised, it will be and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the cedure, a hearing will be held without unnecessary for Applicant to appear or Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ further notice before the Commission on be represented at the hearing. cedure, a hearing will be held without this application if no protest or petition J o s e ph H . G u t r id e , further notice before the Commission on to intervene is filed Within the time re­ Secretary. this application if no protest or petition quired herein, and the Commission on its to intervene is filed within the time re­ own review of the matter finds that a [F.R. Doc. 65-3060; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; 8:46 a.m.] quired herein, and the Commission on grant of the certificate is required by the its own review of the matter finds that a public convenience and necessity. If a grant of the certificate is required by the protest or petition for leave to intervene public convenience and necessity. I f a is timely filed, or if the Commission on SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE protest or petition for leave to intervene its own motion believes that a formal is timely filed, or if the Commission on hearing is required, further notice of its own motion believes that a form al such hearing will be duly given. COMMISSION hearing is required, further notice of such Under the procedure herein provided [File No. 812-1555] hearing will be duly given. for, unless otherwise advised, it will be EQUITY CORP. ET AL. Under the procedure herein provided unnecessary for Applicant to appear or for, unless otherwise advised, it will be be represented at the hearing. Notice of Filing of Application unnecessary for Applicant to appear or he represented at the hearing. J o s e ph H . G u t r id e ," M ar ch 19, 1965. Secretary. In the matter of The Equity Corp., 103 J o se ph H . G u t r id e , [FJR. Doc. 65-3059; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; Park Avenue, New York, N.Y.; Bell In­ Secretary. 8:46 a.m.] tercontinental Corp., 501 Byrkit Street, [Wt. Doc. 65-3058; Piled, Mar. 24, 1965; Mishawaka, Ind.; Charles S. Leonard, 8:46 a.m.] [Docket No. CP64-191] 208 South La Salle Street, Chicago, 111. Notice is hereby given that The Equity [Docket No. CP65-283] WHEELER GAS CO. Corp. (“Equity”), a Delaware corpora­ tion registered under the Investment VALLEY GAS TRANSMISSION, INC Notice of Application Company Act of 1940 (“Act”) as a closed Notice of Application M arch 19, 1965. end, nondiversified management invest­ Take notice that on February 28,1964, ment company, Bell Intercontinental M arch 19, 1965. Wheeler Gas Co. (Applicant), Wheeler, Corp. (“Bell”) , a Delaware corporation VftuSer.notice that on M arch 11, 196 Tex., filed in Docket No. CP64-191 an ap­ controlled by Equity, and Mr. Charles S. Leonard ("Leonard”) have filed an ap­ T p * transmission, Inc., Housto: plication pursuant to section 7(c) of the plication pursuant to section 6(c) of the T e.d 111 Docket No. CP65-283 Natural Gas Act for a certificate of pub­ Act for an order of the Commission ex­ section*^6"* application Pursuant lic convenience and necessity authorizing the construction and operation of certain empting from the provisions of section S S J S S / ithe Natural Gas Act- 1 17(e)(1) of the Act the proposed pay­ SSSSP 5? § 157-7(b) of the regi natural gas facilities, all as more fully ment of $40,540 by Bell to Leonard as a Public r v ^ er -the A °t> for a certificate < set forth in the application on .file with izing + u once and necessity autho: the Commission and open to public commission or fee for services rendered certain Jrf^ruction and operation < inspection. by Leonard in connection with the ac­ quisition by Bell of an aggregate of fully seffn l**1«88^ facilities, all as mo: Specifically, Applicant seeks author­ m the application on fi ization to construct and operate a meter­ 372,000 shares of capital stock of Intex Oil Company (“Intex”) for a total cash inspeSon'3mnussion and open to publ ing and regulator facility on its existing 4-inch line in Wheeler County, Tex., for payment of $3,304,000. All interested the receipt of natural gas from Natural persons are referred to the application zation t n ^ ^ V Applicant seeks author ôn file with the Commission for a com­ p S i l ° nstruct- dpring the 12-monl Gas Pipeline Co. of America (Natural). The application states that Applicant plete statement of the applicants’ repre­ upproDrinf0116110111® with the issuance requires service from Natural in order to sentations which are summarized below. v a X ^ . , autilo^ ation, and opera meet the requirements of its customers. Since July 14, 1959, Leonard has been nection necessary for the coi and continues to be the President and a Total estimated cost of Applicant’s new and Piiof-dlti0nal supplies ° f gas proposed construction is $3,607.30, and director of Aurora Corp. of Illinois A p p S ? i ng fi.elds*in order to enab will be financed with funds on hand. (“Aurora”). On April 25, 1961, Bell ac­ entlv antv,^0- conthuie to meet its pre Protests or petitions to intervene may quired approximately 50.16 percent of thonzed sales commitments. be filed with the Federal Power Commis- the outstanding stock of Aurora with the 3894 NOTICES result that Leonard became an affiliate Section 17(e) (1), insofar as here per­ F ederal R egister. Failure seasonably of an affiliate of Bell and of Equity. tinent, makes it unlawful for any affili­ to file a protest will be construed as a Knowing of the interest of Mr. David ated person of a registered investment waiver of opposition and participation M. Milton, an officer of Equity and Bell, company, or any affiliated person of such in the proceeding. A protest under these in having Equity or a company in the a person, acting as agent, to accept from rules should comply with § 1.40 of the Equity group acquire control of an oil any source any compensation (other general rules of practice which requires exploration and production company, than a regular salary or wages from such that it set forth specifically the grounds Leonard brought to his attention, in late registered company) for the purchase upon which it is made and specify with 1958, the possibility of acquiring a sub­ or sale of any property to or for such particularity the facts, matters, and stantial investment in Sunset Interna­ registered company or any controlled things relied upon, but shall not include tional Petroleum Corp. (“Sunset”) . company thereof except in the course issues or allegations phrased generally. Lengthy negotiations ensued between the of such person’s business as an under­ Protests not in reasonable compliance parties in which Leonard participated writer or broker. with the requirements of the rules may extensively but these efforts were unsuc­ Notice is further given that any inter­ be rejected. The original and six (6) cessful and the negotiations were termi­ ested person may, not later than April 7, copies of the protest shall be filed with nated in September 1959. During the 1965, at 5:30 p.m., submit to the Com­ the Commission, and a copy shall be course of the negotiations, however, a mission in writing a request for a hearing served concurrently upon applicant’s condition was imposed by the principal on the matter accompanied by a state­ representative, or applicant if no repre­ stockholders of Sunset that the pur­ ment as to the nature of his interest, the sentative is named. If the protest in­ chaser would be required simultaneously reason for such request and the issues of cludes a request for oral hearing, such to purchase a large block of Intex fact or law proposed to be controverted, request shall meet the requirements of stock (about 18 percent) which they or he may request that he be notified if § 1.247(d) (4) of the special rule. Subse­ then held. Leonard was at that time the Commission shall order a hearing quent assignment of these proceedings a director of Intex. After termination thereon. Any such communication for oral hearing, if any, will be by Com­ of the negotiations for the purchase should be addressed: Secretary, Securi­ mission order which will be served on of Sunset stock, Leonard brought about ties and Exchange Commission, Wash­ each party of record. direct negotiations between the Equity ington, D.C., 20549. A copy of such re­ No. M C 531 (Sub-No. 181), filed group and Intex with a view toward quest shall be served personally or by M arch 4, 1965. Applicant: YOUNGER a substantial investment in Intex stock mail (air mail if the person being served BR O TH ER S, INC., 4904 Griggs Road, by Equity or a company in the Equity is located more than 500 miles from the Houston, Tex. Applicant’s attorney: group. This program contemplated the point of mailing) upon applicant at the Ewell H. Muse (same as applicant). Au­ purchase of the block of Tntex stock address stated above. Proof of such thority sought to operate as a common held by the principal stockholders of service (by affidavit or in case of an carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Sunset and also a large block of stock attomey-at-law by certificate) shall be routes, transporting: Liquid chemicals, (about 30 percent) held by a minority filed contemporaneously with the re­ in bulk, in tank vehicles, from Carpen- group not associated with the principal quest. A t any time after said date, as tersville, 111., to points in Arizona, Cali­ stockholders of Sunset. These two ac­ provided by Rule 0-5 of the rules and fornia, Connecticut, Delaware, the Dis­ quisitions would constitute effective con­ regulations promulgated under the Act, trict of Columbia, Idaho, Maine, Mary­ trol of Intex but before the program was an order disposing of the application land, Massachusetts, Nevada, New accomplished the principal stockholders herein may be issued by the Commission Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North of Sunset disposed of all but 22,000 shares upon the basis of the information stated Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode of their Intex stock which shares Bell in said application, unless an order for Island, South Carolina, Utah, Vermont, ultimately purchased in October 1960. hearing upon said application shall be is­ Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and The minority group of Intex stockholders sued upon request or upon the Commis­ Vyoming. refused to sell to Bell unless Bell would sion’s own motion. N ote: Common control may be inv°lv®?: offer an equal opportunity to all other For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ f a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Intex stockholders and accordingly, Bell gated authority). equests it be held at Chicago, 111- then invited tenders pursuant to which it acquired, on March 15, 1961, approxi­ [ s e a l ] O rval L. DuBois, No. MC 1124 (Sub-No. 202), ^ ^ mately 350,000 shares, giving Bell a total Secretary. uary 24, 1965. Applicant: HEKiuw TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a cor of 372,000 shares or about 52 V2 percent [F.R. Doc. 65-3048; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; ►oration, 2301 McKinney Avenue, Hous- of the outstanding stock of Intex. 8:46 a.m.] on, Tex. Applicant’s attorney: Ra^n It is further represented that, based on their experience in similar transac­ V. Pulley, Jr., 617 Old First Nahona tions, Equity and Bell believe that the 5ank Building, Dallas 2, Tex. Author^ proposed fee of 1.22 percent of the pur­ ty sought to operate as a commo INTERSTATE COMMERCE ier, by motor vehicle, over regular chase price involved is reasonable. The application asserts that all of Leonard’s outes, transporting: G eneral co COMMISSION ties (except those of activities were performed before he be­ [Notice No. 748] came a person affiliated with the Equity Lousehold goods as defined by ^ g group; that the only other compensation MOTOR CARRIER, BROKER, WATER [fission, commodities in bulk ^ equiring special equipm^t) , ( ^ ^ he received after becoming an affiliated CARRIER, AND FREIGHT FOR­ person was by virtue of his continuing ween Monroe, La., and the WARDER APPLICATIONS Armstrong Tire & Rubber Co. at or to hold his position in Aurora after that Tatchez, Miss.; from Monroe over company became an affiliated person of M arch 19,1965. siana Highway 15 to Fe > sjte Equity and Bell; and that Leonard’s The following applications are gov­ hence over U.S. Highway 84 to tlw ^ affiliation with the Equity group re­ erned by Special Rule 1.2471 of the Com­ ►f the Armstrong Tire & the sulted from a transaction wholly unre­ mission’s general rules of practice (49 >r near Natchez and ^ tutatermediate lated to the activities for which the pres­ C FR 1.247), published in the F ederal ent commission is to be paid. ame route, serving no an(j R egister, issue of December 3, 1963, ef­ »oints; (2) between A J e x a ^ n a ^ ubber Section 6(c) of the Act empowers the fective January 1, 1964. These rules he site of the Armstrong < , ^ from Commission to exempt conditionally or provide, among other things, that a pro­ unconditionally any person, security or To. at or near Na^ ez’jJSay 165 to test to the granting of an application Alexandria over U.S. Hignw y transaction from any provision or provi­ must be filed with the Commission with­ junction sions of the Act or from any rule or regu­ in 30 days after date of notice of filing unction Louisiana lation thereunder, if and to the extent iver Louisiana Highway 8 of the application is published in the xmisiana Highway 772, th thence that such exemption is necessary or ap­ siana Highway 772f of 8» propriate in the public interest and con­ 1 Copies of Special Rule 1.247 can be •ver U.S. Highway 84 to ttje s neftr sistent with the protection of investors obtained by writing to the Secretary, Inter­ ____ Tirp fe Rubber Co. at and the purposes fairly intended by the state Commerce Commission, Washington, Act. D.C., 20423. Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3895

serving no intermediate points; (b ) from Avenue, Chicago 33, 111. Applicant’s at­ bersburg, Pa. Applicant’s attorney: Alexandria over U.S. Highway 165 to torney: James W. Wrape, Sterick Build­ Christian V. Graf, 407 North Front Pollock, La., thence over Louisiana ing, Memphis, Tenn. Authority sought Street, Harrisburg, Pa. Authority Highway 8 to Trout, La., thence over to operate as a common carrier, by motor sought to operate as a common carrier, U.S. Highway 84 to the site of the A rm ­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, strong Tire & Rubber Co. at or near ing: (1) Trailers, semitrailers and transporting: Scrap iron, scrap paper, Natchez and return over the same route, trailer chassis and semitrailer chassis scrap fabrics, metal borings, and metal serving no intermediate points; (c ) from (except those designed to be drawn by turnings, in dump vehicles, from points Alexandria over Louisiana Highway 28 passenger automobiles, in initial move­ in Pennsylvania, to points in Maryland. to junction U.S. Highway 84 near Archie, ments in truckaway and driveaway serv­ Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, La., thence over U.S. Highway 84 to the ice) , from Oshkosh, Wis., to points in the applicant requests it be held at Washington, site of the Armstrong Tire & Rubber Co. United States, including points in Alaska, D.C. but (excluding points in Hawaii), and at or near Natchez and return over the No. MC 27817 (Sub-No. 60), filed (2) tractors, in secondary driveaway same route, serving no intermediate March 5, 1965. Applicant: H. C. GAB- service, only when drawing trailers mov­ points; (3) between Baton Rouge, La., LER, INC. Rural Delivery No. 3, Cham- ing in initial driveaway service, from and the site of the Armstrong Tire & bersburg, Pa. Applicant’s attorney: Oshkosh, Wis., to points in Alaska, Ari­ Rubber Co., at or near Natchez, Miss., Christian V. Graf, 407 North Front over U.S. Highway 61, serving no inter­ zona, Nevada, Oregon, and Vermont. Street, Harrisburg, Pa. Authority mediate points; (4) between Memphis, Note: If a hearing Is deemed necessary, sought to operate as a common carrier, Tenn., and the site of the Armstrong applicant requests it be held at Madison, Wis. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Tire & Rubber Co. at or near Natchez, No. MC 23942 (Sub-No. 16), filed March transporting: (1) Aluminum and wooden Miss., over U.S. Highway 61, serving no 3, 1965. Applicant: THE SEACOAST lawn and patio furniture, wooden house­ intermediate points; (5) between Jack- TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a cor­ hold items, and wooden toys, from Wells- son, Miss., and the site of the Armstrong poration, 500 Water Street, Jacksonville, ville and Whitesville, N.Y., to points in Tire & Rubber Co., at or near Natchez, Minnesota, North Carolina, and South Miss.; from Jackson over U.S. Highway Fla. Applicant’s attorney: Richard D. Carolina, and-(2) furniture cushions and 51 to Hazlehurst, Miss., thence over Sanborn, Jr., Law Department, Atlantic furniture cushion material, from Rich­ Mississippi Highway 28 to Fayette, Miss., Coast Line Railroad Co., 500 Water Street, Jacksonville, Fla. Authority mond, Va., to Wellsville, and Whitesville, thence over U.S. Highway 61 to the site N.Y. of the Armstrong Tire & Rubber Co., at sought to operate as a common carrier, or near Natchez and return over the by motor vehicle, over a regular route, Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, same route, serving no intermediate transporting: General commodities, in applicant requests it be held at Washington) D.C. Points; and (6) between Mobile, Ala., substituted motor-for-rail service, be­ tween Sarasota and Punta Gorda, Fla., and the site of the Armstrong Tire & No. MC 29566 (Sub-No. 99), filed over U.S. Highway 41, serving no inter­ Rubber Co., at or near Natchez, Miss., March 1, 1965. Applicant: SOUTH­ mediate points, as an alternate route for over U.S. Highway 98, serving no inter­ WEST FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1400 operating convenience only in connec­ mediate points and Mobile, Ala., as a Kansas Avenue, Kansas City, Kans. Au­ tion with applicant’s regular-route oper­ Point of joinder only. thority sought'to operate as a common ations between Tampa and Naples, Fla. Nora: Applicant states that service at carrier, by motor vehicle,-over irregular points authorized over the above proposed Note: Common control may be involved. routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ r™tes (1) through (6) inclusive, will be re­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant ucts, meat byproducts, and articles dis­ stricted to traffic originating at or destined requests it be held at Tampa, Fla. tributed by meat packinghouses, as de­ w the site of the Armstrong Tire & Rubber No. MC 25798 (Sub-No. 130), filed scribed in Sections A and C, of Appendix . °? at or near Natchez, Miss. If a hearing I, to the report in Descriptions in Motor f.eemecl necessary, applicant requests it be February 24, 1965. Applicant: CLAY aeld at Natchez, m ib« HYDER TRUCKING LINES, INC., 301 Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and Highway North, Dade City, Fla. Appli­ 766 (except hides and commodities in , ?n°rMc 1824 (Sub-No. 36).filed March cant’s attorney: Daniel B. Johnson, 1815 bulk, in tank vehicles), from Lexington, M965 Applicant: P R E S T O N T R U C K - H Street NW., Washington, D.C. Au­ Nebr., and points within five (5) miles SS. C0MpANY, INC., Preston, Md. thority sought to operate as a common thereof, and Minden, Nebr., and points applicant’s representative: Frank V. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular within five (5) miles thereof, to points S A same as aPPUcant) . Authority routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from in Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Mis­ hv -T * ■ °Perate as a common carrier, Lafayette, Ind., to points in Kentucky, souri, Oklahoma,, and the Indiana por­ vehicle’ over Irregular routes, Tennessee, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ala­ tion of the Chicago Commercial Zone, «•¡erf Plastic articles and articles bama, Georgia, and Florida. and Memphis, Tenn. trihuJ1 manufacture, sale and dis- Note: I f a hearing Is deemed necessary, Note: If a hearing Is deemed necessary, Md thereof, between Frederick, applicant requests It be held -at Omaha, «•. and points in New York! applicant requests lt be held at Washington, D.C. Nebr, Dlkant ~ a Scaring is deemed necessary, ap- No. MC 25869 (Sub-No. 34), filed No. MC 30209 (Sub-No. 16) (AMEND­ eyracuse^N,Y^StS lt b® heW at Elmira, or March 2, 1965. Applicant: NOLTE M E N T ) , filed February 4,1965, published BROS. TRUCK LINE, INC., South F ederal R egister issue of February 25, ¿ c h ^ io et05 (SuJ?-No. 425), filed Omaha, Nebr. Authority sought to op­ 1965, amended M arch 17, 1965, and re­ TRAKrcTm Applicant: DEALERS erate as a common carrier, by motor published, as amended this issue. A p­ Avenue PhiINC‘’ 13101 South Torrence vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ plicant: JOHN O’SHEA, INC., Foot of tornev-’ T?icag0 33» HI- Applicant’s at- ing: General commodities (except those Birch Street, Ridgefield Park, N.J. Ap­ Ing Wrape> Sterick Build- of unusual value, Classes A and B explo­ plicant’s representative: Bert Collins, ^operatea^,’ Tenn‘ Authority sought sives, household goods as defined by the 140 Cedar Street, New York 6, N.Y._ Au­ vehicle a COmm°n carrier, by motor Commission, commodities requiring spe­ thority sought to operate as a contrast tag; T ra ill ^ ^ ular routes, transport- cial equipment and those injurious or carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular t° be drawrf u0ther than those designed contaminating to other lading), serving routes, transporting: Such merchandise in i n i t i o passenger automobiles), Blair, Nebr., as an off-route point in as is dealt in by wholesale, retail, and Ice, from r , ovements in truckaway serv- connection with applicant’s authorized chain grocery and food business houses, arapaigh. in., to points in the regular-route operations between Oma­ (1) between Carlstadt, Lyndhurst, and and Hawaii S exc*u<1*ng Poluts in Alaska ha, Nebr., and Churdan, Iowa. Englewood, N.J., on the one hand, and, on the other, points in Connecticut, and Note* if o v . Note: If a hearing Is deemed necessary, points in Philadelphia, Chester, Dela­ applicant rennoJlar^ 8 18 deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Omaha, ware, Montgomery, and Bucks Counties, N requests it be held at Chicago, in! Nebr. Pa., and (2) between Lyndhurst and ^arch ^ Cltl 4.05 (Sub-No. 426), filed No. MC 27817 (Sub-No. 59), filed Englewood, N.J., on the one hand, and, Tr a n s it Applicant: DEALERS March 5, 1965. Applicant: H. C. GAB- on the other, points in Northampton, 1T> 13101 South Torrence LER, INC., Rural Delivery No. 3, Cham- Lehigh, and Berks Counties, Pa., and 3896 NOTICES

points in Orange, Rockland, Sullivan, N.C.; from Asheville over U.S. Highway and those injurious or contaminating to Ulster, Dutchess, Putnam, Westchester, 74 to junction U.S. Highway 401 near other lading), between Asheville, N.C. Nassau, and Suffolk Counties, N.Y. Laurenburg, N.C.-, thence over U.S. High­ on the one hand, and, on the other, (1) N ote: The purpose of this republication way 401 to Fayetteville and return over points in South Carolina (other than (a) is to add the two counties in Pennsylvania the same route, serving all intermediate Whitmire, S.C., (b) those within 40 miles in (2) above. If a hearing is deemed nec­ points within 100 miles of High Point, of Hartsville, S.C., and (c) those in essary, applicant requests it be held at New N.C.; (5) between Hendersonville, N.C., Oconee, Pickens, Greenville, Spartan­ York, N.Y. and Hartsville, S.C.; from Hendersonville burg, Cherokee, York, Anderson, Laurens, No. MC 30844 (Sub-No. 173), filed over U.S. Highway 176 to Spartanburg, Union, Chester, Abbeville, and Green­ March 8, 1965. Applicant: KROBLIN S.C., thence over South Carolina High­ wood Counties, S.C., and that part of REFRIGERATED X-PRESS, INC., Post way 9 to Chester,-S.C., thence over U.S. Lancaster County, S.C., more than 40 Office Box 218, Sumner, Iowa. Author­ Highway 321 to Rockton, S.C., thence miles from Hartsville, S.C.), (2) points in ity sought to operate as a common car­ over South Carolina Highway 34 to Bish- that part of Georgia north and east of rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular opville, S.C., thence over U.S. Highway a line beginning at Savannah, and ex­ routes, transporting: Frozen foods, from 15 to Hartsville (also from Chester over tending along U.S. Highway 80 to Swains- Winchester, Va., and Hanover, Pa., to South Carolina Highway 9 to Pageland, boro, thence along U.S. Highway 1 to Cincinnati, Ohio. S.C., thence over South Carolina High­ Louisville, thence along Georgia High­ way 151 to Hartsville), and return over way 24 to Eatonton, thence along U.S. Note: Common control may be involved. If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant the same route, serving all intermediate Highway 129 to junction U.S. Highway requests it be held at Cincinnati, Ohio. points in South Carolina (except those in 29, thence along U.S. Highway 29 to the Fairfield County, S.C.). Georgia-South Carolina State line, No. MC 31024 (Sub-No. 32), filed (6) Between Greenville, S.C., and Co­ thence along the Georgia-South Caro­ March 1, 1965. Applicant: NEPTUNE lumbia, S.C.; from Greenville over U.S. lina State line to the point of beginning; WORLD-WIDE MOVING, INC., 55 Wey- Highway 276 to junction Interstate (3) points in North Carolina more than man Avenue, New Rochelle, N.Y. Ap­ Highway 26, thence over Interstate 100 miles from and east of a north-south plicant’s attorney: S. Sidney Eisen, 140 Highway 26 to Columbia and return over line drawn „through High Point on or Cedar Street, New York 6, N.Y, Author­ the same route, serving the intermediate south of North Carolina Highway 70; and ity sought to operate as a common car­ points in Greenville and Laurens Coun­ (4) points in North Carolina more than rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular ties, S.C.; (7) between Columbia, S.C., 100 miles from and west of a north-south routes, transporting: Household goods, and Spartanburg, S.C.; (a) from Colum­ line drawn through High Point which are as defined by the Commission, between bia over U.S. Highway 176 to Spartan­ both on and south of U.S. Highway 70 points in Connecticut, District of Colum­ burg and return over the same route, and on or east of U.S. Highway 276; the bia, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massa­ serving the intermediate point of Whit­ service herein is restricted as follows: chusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New mire, S.C., and those in Spartanburg and service at the authorized points in North York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Union Counties, S.C.; and (b) from Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia is and those in Fairfax and Arlington Columbia over Interstate Highway 26 to restricted to shipments transported to, Counties, Va., and Alexandria, Va., on junction U.S. Highway 221, thence over from or through Louisville or Lexington, the one hand, and, on the other, points U.S. Highway 221 to Spartanburg and Ky., via Asheville, N.C., or a point within in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Louisiana, return over the same route, serving the 5 miles of Asheville. Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, intermediate point of Whitmire, S.C., and South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washing­ Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, those in Spartanburg and Union Coun­ applicant requests it be held at Washington, ton, and Wyoming. ties, S.C.; (8) between junction Inter­ D.C. N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, state Highway 26 and U.S. Highway 25 No. M C 31600 (Sub-No. 582), filed applicant requests it be held at New York, near Fletcher, N.C., and Charleston, S.C., N.Y. M arch 8, 1965. Applicant: P. f- over Interstate Highway 26, serving no MUTRIE MOTOR TRANSPORTATION, intermediate points; (9) between Green­ No. MC 31389 (Sub-No. 66), filed Feb­ INC., Calvary Street, Waltham, Mass. ville, S.C., and Augusta, Ga., over U.S. ruary 18, 1965. Applicant: McLEAN Applicant’s attorney: Harry C. Ames, Jr., Highway 25, serving intermediate points TRUCKING COMPANY, a corporation, Transportation Building, Washington, in Greenville, and Laurens, and Green­ Post Office Box 213, Winston-Salem, D.C. Authority sought to operate as a wood Counties, S.C.; and (10) between N.C. Applicant’s attorney: David G. common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Columbia, S.C., and Savannah, Ga.; from MacDonald, 1000 16th Street N W ., W ash ­ irregular routes, transporting: “ iQM Columbia over U.S. Highway 321 to junc­ ington, D.C., 20036. Authority sought to chemicals, in bulk, in tank vehicles, fro tion U.S. Highway 17, thence over U.S. operate as a common carrier, by motor Carpentersville, 111., to points in Anzo . Highway 17 through junction U.S. High­ vehicle, over irregular and regular routes, California, Connecticut, Delaware, tne way 17A, to Savannah (also from junc­ transporting'—REGULAR ROUTES: District of Columbia, Idaho, Main, tion U.S. Highways 17 and 17A over U.S. General commodities (except those of Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, _ Highway 17A to Savannah), and return unusual value, Classes A and B explo­ Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, N sives, household goods as defined by the over the same route, serving no inter­ Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylva^ma, Rhoae mediate points. Commission, commodities in bulk, com­ island, South Carolina, Utah, Virgini , modities requiring special equipment In connection with (1) through (10) Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and those injurious or contaminating to above, service is authorized at off-route and Wyoming. other lading), (1) between Asheville, points in North Carolina within 100 miles Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary- N.C., and Middleboro, Ky.; from Ashville of High Point, N.C., as off-route points in applicant requests it be held at Chi g . over U.S. Highway 25 to junction U.S. connection with carrier’s authorized Highway 25E, thence over U.S. Highway service routes in North Carolina within No. M C 31600 (Sub-No. 583), fil^ 25E to Middleboro and return over the 100 miles of High Point; service is au­ M arch 4, 1965. Applicant. • same route, serving no intermediate thorized at off-route points in Oconee, MUTRIE MOTOR TRANSPORTATION points and serving Middleboro for the Pickens, Greenville, Spartanburg, Chero­ INC., Calvary Street, Waltham, »» purpose of joinder only; (2) between kee, York, Anderson, Laurens, Union, 02154. Applicant’s attorney. H arry^ junction U.S. Highways 25E and 25W Chester, Abbeville, Greenwood, and Lan­ Ames, Jr., Transportation near Newport, Tenn., and junction U.S. caster Counties, S.C., and those within 40 Washington, D.C., 20® ^ ‘ ^ carrier, Highways 25E and 25W near Corbin, Ky., miles of Hartsville, S.C., in connection sought to operate as a routeSj over U.S. Highway 25W, serving no inter­ with carrier’s authorized service routes by motor vehicle, over .ir^ g iT1 pressure mediate points and serving the termini in South Carolina. IRREGULAR transporting: Talc, in bulk, tovvn for the purpose of joinder only; (3) be­ differential tank vehicles, fr BrunS. R O U T E S : General commodities (except tween London, Ky., and Emanuel, Ky., of W est Windsor, Vt., to North Bruns over Kentucky Highway 229, serving no those pf unusual value, Classes A and B , N.J. intermediate points and serving the ter­ explosives, household goods as defined necessary. mini for the purpose of joinder only ; (4) by the Commission, commodities in bulk, between Asheville, N.C., and Fayetteville, commodities requiring special equipment Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3897

No. MC 35320 (Sub-No. 83) r filed vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 51146 (Sub-No. 12), filed March 5, 1965. Applicant: TJ.M .E. ing: <1) Precast concrete slabs and March 1,1965. Applicant: SCHNEIDER FREIGHT, INC., 2604 Texas Avenue, beams, and accessories and materials TRANSPORT & STORAGE, INC., 817 post Office Box 1120, Lubbock, Tex. A p ­ incidental to the installation thereof, (a ) McDonald Street, Green Bay, Wis. Ap­ plicant’s attorneys: Frank M . Garrison from Kent, Ohio, to points in Indiana, plicant’s attorney: Charles W. Singer, and W. D. Benson, Jr. (same address as Kentucky, Michigan, New York, Penn­ 33 North L a Salle Street, Chicago, HI., applicant), 13th Floor, Great Plains sylvania, and West Virginia, (b) from 60602. Authority sought to operate as a Building, Lubbock, Tex. Authority Dayton, Ohio, to points in Indiana, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over sought to operate as a common carrier, Kentucky, and Michigan, and (c) from irregular routes, transporting: Sanitary by motor vehicle, over regular routes, Livonia, Mich., to points in Indiana and paper products and materials, equip­ transporting: General commodities, be­ Kentucky, and (2) accessories and mate­ ment, and supplies used in the manufac­ tween Kansas City and St. Louis, Mo., rials used in the transportation or in­ ture and distribution of the above de­ over U.S. Highway 40, serving no inter­ stallation of' precast concrete slabs and scribed commodities, and in connection mediate points, as an alternate route for beams, (a) from points in Indiana, therewith premiums and advertising ma­ operating convenience only in connec­ Kentucky, Michigan, New York, Penn­ terial, between Green Bay, Wis., and tion with applicant’s regular-route op­ sylvania, and W est Virginia to ICent, Cheboygan, Mich. erations, restricted to traffic originating Ohio, (b) from points in Indiana and N ote: Applicant states it now holds au­ or destined to points east of St. Louis, Kentucky and M ichigan to Dayton, Ohio, thority to transport wet lapwood pulp, in­ Mo.' and (c) from points in Indiana and cluding ground pulp, sanitary paper tissues Kentucky to Livonia, Mich. Restricted moving in parent rolls, and materials, equip­ Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, ment and supplies used or useful in the applicant requests it be held at St. Louis, or against service to or from points in Lake County, Ind. Restricted against the manufacture of the above described com­ Kansas City, Mo. modities between the points above described. transportation of commodities which, No. MC 35540 (Sub-No. 12), filed Feb­ Applicant states no duplication of authority by reason of size or weight, require the is sought. If a hearing is deemed necessary, ruary 17, 1965. Applicant: SC H R O ­ use of special equipment. . applicant requests it be held at Chicago, HI. DER’S EXPRESS, INC., 1550 _Perin Street, Cincinnati, O h io .' Applicant’s N ote: The purpose of this «publication, No. MC 52458 (Sub-No. 199), filed is to more clearly set forth the proposed attorney: Robert C. Smith, 512 Illinois operation. If a hearing is deemed necessary, March 1, 1965. Applicant: T. I. MC­ Building, Indianapolis 4, Irid. Author­ applicant requests it be held at Columbus, CORMACK TRUCKING COMPANY, ity sought to operate as a common car­ Ohio. INC., U.S. Route 9, at Green Street, rier, by motor vehicle, over regular Woodbridge, N.J. Applicant’s attorney: routes, transporting: General commodi­ No. MC 41849 (Sub-No. 24), filed Chester A. Zyblut, 1000 Connecticut ties (except those of unusual value, M arch 1,1965. Applicant: K E IG H T L E Y Avenue NW., Washington, D.C., 20036. Classes A and B explosives, household BROS., INC., 1601 South 39th Street, St. Authority sought to operate, as a common goods as defined by the Commission, com­ Louis, Mo. Applicant’s attorney : Ernest carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular modities in bulk, commodities requiring A. Brooks H , 1311-12 Ambassador Build­ routes, transporting: Arsenic acid, other special equipment, and those injurious ing, St. Louis, Mo; Authority sought to than fused, in bulk, in tank vehicles, or contaminating to other lading) (1) operate as a common carrier, by motor from Bound Brook, N.J., to Gainesville, between Vincennes, Ind., and the junc­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Fla. tion of Indiana Highway 56 and U.S. ing: Commodities, in dump vehicles, (1) between points in the St. Louis, Mo.-East N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Highway 150; from Vincennes over U.S. applicant requests it be held at Washington, St. Louis, 111., Commercial Zone, on the Highway 150 to junction Indiana High­ D.C. way 56, and return over the same route, one hand, and, on the other, points in No. MC 52458 (Sub-No. 200), filed serving no intermediate points, (2) be­ Missouri on and east of U.S. Highway M arch 8,1965. Applicant: T. I. M cC O R - tween Paoli, Ind., and the junction of 65. MACK TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., Indiana Highway 56 and Indiana High­ N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, U S. Highway 9, at Green Street, Wood- way 107 west of Madison, Ind.; from applicant requests it be held at St. Louis, Paoli over Indiana Highway 56 to junc­ Mo. bridge, N.J. Applicant’s attorney: Ches­ ter A. Zyblut, 1000 Connecticut Avenue tion Indiana Highway 107 west of M adi­ No. MC 47142 (Sub-No. 86), filed NW., Washington, D.C. Authority son, and return over the same route, March 3, 1965. Applicant: C. I. W H IT­ serving no intermediate points, but serv­ sought to operate as a common carrier, TEN TRANSFER COMPANY, a corpora­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, er junction Indiana Highway 56 and tion, 200 19th Street, Huntington, W . Va. Indiana Highway 107 for purposes of transporting: Liquid sugar, invert sugar, Authority sought to operate as a common syrups, blends or mixtures of syrups and joinder only, (3) between Huntingburg, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular and Ramsey, Ind.; from Hunting- sugar, in bulk, from the Town of Monte­ routes, transporting: Classes A, B, and zuma, Cayuga County, N.Y., to points in wrg over Indiana Highway 64 to Ram­ C explosives, and blasting supplies, mate­ sey, and return over the same route, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, rials, and agents, between Simsbury, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hamp­ no intermediate points, and (4) Conn., and points in Massachusetts, New Detween Evansville, Ind., and Salem, HI.; shire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsyl­ Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and vania, Virginia, West Virginia, Vermont, £ • E^nsvHle over U.S. Highway 460 Vermont. Rhode Island, and the District of nvJU™ -101? IHinois Highway 37, thence rein IUm°*s Highway 37 to Salem, and N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Columbia. applicant requests it be held at Washington, into °,Ver same route, serving no N ote: If a hearing is deemed ’ necessary, intermediate points. D.C. applicant requests it be held at Washington, No. MC 51146 (Sub-No. 11), filed D.C. alternfto"1116 above applied for routes are onlv in rou*®s ic>r operating convenience M arch 1,1965. Applicant: S C H N E ID E R No. MC 52629 (Sub-No. 60), filed entlv q. .9^nnection with applicant’s pres- TRANSPORT & STORAGE, INC., 817 March 10, 1965. Applicant: HUBER & If a hAaJ?10rl,Zed regular route operations McDonald Street, Green Bay, Wis. Ap­ HUBER MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., Post lequestTi+^L18 denied necessary, applicanl Office Box 1000, Staunton, Va. Appli­ quests It be held at Indianapolis, Ind. plicant’s attorney: Charles W . Singer, 33 North L a Salle Street, Chicago, HI., cant’s attorney: Francis W. Mclnery, 1000 16th Street N W ., W ashington, D.C., mS t W!? 8! 83 (Sub-No. 13) (A M E N D - 60602. Authority sought to operate as a 20036. Authority sought to operate as a Pederat’ » et* Ju*y 24> 1964, published ir common carrier, by motor vehicle, over common carrier, by motor vehicle, over 1964 ^ RELGISTER issue of August 12 irregular routes, transporting: Lumber irregular routes, transporting: Prepared Publish^ oded M arch 1Q. 1965, and re­ from Ridgway, Pa., and points within five cant- t u b f e n d e d this issue. Appli- foodstuffs, requiring refrigeration, from PANY?E GLENN CARTAGE COM- (5) miles thereof, to points in Illinois, New Albany, Ind., to points in Missouri, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Street’ pe!?01? 01^ 011* 1H5 South State Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, West Virginia, n Ä ^ S ^ O h t o . Applicant’s attor- Wisconsin. Kentucky, and Tennessee. Columbus - Ä . 50 W est Broad Street N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, t° operate* Q * ’ 01uov Authority sough applicant requests it be held at Washington, applicant requests it be held at Minneapolis, as a common carrier, by moto: D.C. Minn. 3898 NOTICES

No. MC 55878 (Sub-No. 10) Piled thorized herein are limited to a transporta­ bulk, from Ligonier, Ind., to points in tion service to be performed under special March 10, 1965. Applicant: DOBSON Hlinois, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan FREIGHT LINES, INC., 2 Norman and individual contracts or agreements with persons (as defined in section 203(a) of the Louisville, Ky., and St. Louis, Mo. Street, Bridgeport, Conn. Applicant’s Interstate Commerce Act) who operate retail N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary representative: Edward J. Morrison, 2223 stores, the business of which is the sale of applicant requests it be held at Chicago! Augusta Road, West Columbia, S.C. Au­ food, for the transportation of the commodi­ 111., or Indianapolis, Ind. thority sought to operate as a common ties specified and over irregular routes as carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular indicated. No service may be,performed in No. M C 75185 (Sub-No. 250), filed routes, transporting: Structural steel, the transportation of the commodities speci­ M arch 4, 1965. Applicant: SERVICE from Roanoke, Va„ to points in New fied above in bulk, in tank or hopper vehicles. T R U C K IN G CO., INC., Post Office Box Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine, and If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant 276, Federalsburg, Md. Applicant’s at­ does not specify location. damaged and rejected shipments, on re­ torney : Francis W. Mclnerny, 1000 16th turn. No. MC 61403 (Sub-No. 120), filed Street N W ., Washington, D.C. Author­ ity sought to operate as a common car­ N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, M arch 8,1965. Applicant: T H E M A S O N rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular applicant requests it be held at Roanoke, Va. AND DIXON TANK LINES, INC., East­ man Road, Kingsport, Tenn. Appli­ routes, transporting: Fruit juices and No. MC 60021 (Sub-No. 1), filed Feb­ cant’s attorney: W. C. Mitchell, 140 fruit concentrates, pasteurized, in car­ ruary 23, 1965. Applicant: JOHN Mc- Cedar Street, New York, N.Y. Author­ tons, cans and drums, from Hudson and KENNA, doing business as McKENNA ity sought to operate as a common car­ Marlboro, N.Y., to points in Florida and MOTOR EXPRESS, 34 Browertown rier, by motor vehicle, oVer irregular Georgia. Road, Little Falls, N.J. Authority sought routes, transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, N o te: I f a hearing is deemed necessary, to operate as a contract carrier, by motor between points in St. Charles Parish, La., applicant requests it be held at Washington, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ on the one hand, and, on the other, points D.C. ing : ( 1 ) Such merchandise, as is dealt in in the United States. No. M C 75320 (Sub-No. 103), filed by wholesale, retail, and grocery stores M arch 8, 1965. Applicant: CAMPBELL and food business houses, and in connec­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at New Orleans, S IX T Y -SIX EXPRESS, INC., Post Office tion therewith, equipment, materials, and Lai Box 807, Springfield, Mo. Applicant’s supplies used in the conduct of such attorney: Harold D. Miller, Jr., Suite 700 business, (a) between points within the No. MC 65088 (Sub-No. 2), filed March Petroleum Building, Post Office Box territory bounded by a line beginning at 4, 1965. Applicant: O.K. TRANSFER & 1250, Jackson, Miss., 39205. Authority Weehawken, N.J., and extending in a S T O R A G E CO., INC., 2615 25th Avenue, sought to operate as a common carrier, northwesterly direction through Ruther­ Gulfport, Miss. Authority sought to by motor vehicle, over regular routes, ford to Mountain View, N.J., thence in a operate as a common carrier, by motor transporting: General commodities (ex­ southwesterly direction to Myersville, Vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ cept those of unusual value, Classes A N.J., thence west through Far Hills to ing: General commodities (except those and B explosives, household goods as de­ of unusual value, Classes A and B ex­ Cokesbury, N.J., thence in a northwest­ fined by the Commission, commodities plosives, commodities in bulk, commodi­ erly direction through Port Murray to in bulk, and those requiring special ties requiring special equipment, and Belvidere, N.J., thence across the Dela­ equipment), between Magee, Miss., and those injurious or contaminating to other ware River to the west bank thereof, Hattiesburg, Miss.: from Magee over U.S. lading), between Mobile, Ala., and New thence in a northeasterly direction along Highway 49 to Hattiesburg, and return Orleans, La., on the one hand, and, on the the west bank of said river through M il­ over the same route, serving no inter­ other, the site of the National Aeronau­ ford and Matamoras, Pa., to Port Jervis, mediate points and serving Magee, Miss., tics and Space Administration Central­ N.Y., thence in a northeasterly direc­ as a point of joinder only, as an alter­ ized Testing Site located in Hancock tion through Middletown to Pine Bush, nate route for operating convenience County, Miss., near Santa Rosa and N.Y., thence east to Wallkill, N.Y., thence only in connection with applicant’s reg­ Gainesville, Miss. in a southeasterly direction to Newburgh, ular route operations. N.Y., and thence south along the west N o te: I f a hearing is deemed necessary, N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, bank of the Hudson River to Weehawken, applicant requests it be held at Gulfport, pplicant requests it be held at Jackson, N.J., including the points named, (b) Miss. fiss. between points in the above specified No. MC 66194 (Sub-No. 4), filed March No. M C 83539 (Sub-No. 139), filed Feh- territory, on the one hand, and, on thé 1,1965. Applicant: O W L T R U C K C O M ­ uary 23, 1965. Applicant: C & » other, points in Bronx, Kings, Queens, PANY, a corporation, 500 South Ala­ TRANSPORTATION CO. INC., 19^ Nassau, New York, and Richmond meda Street, Compton, Calif. Appli­ Counties, N.Y., and Bergen, Essex, and Vest Commerce Street, Post Office Box cant’s attorney: James W. Wade, 729 976, Dallas, Tex., 75222. Applicants Hudson Counties, N.J. (2) Fruits, veg­ Citizens National Bank Building, 453 etables, farm products, poultry, and sea­ ttorney: W. T. Brunson, 419 Northwest South Spring Street, Los Angeles, Calif., iixth Street, Oklahoma City, Okla. au- food, in the respective seasons of their 90013. Authority sought to operate as hority sought to operate as a _comw_ production, from points in Ulster County, a common carrier, by motor vehicle, arrier, by motor vehicle, over ureguiar N.Y., and Hunterdon County, N.J., to over irregular routes, transporting: points in the above-specified territory. outes, transporting: Pipe, and pipec' ' Solid propellant rocket motors requiring Applicant states the above proposed ections, pipe couplings, and pipefitti9> special equipment, moving on Govern­ operations authorized herein will be rhen moving in connection there ment bills of lading, between the plant limited to a transportation service to be except pipe, pipe connections, P site of United Technology Develop­ ouplings and pipe fittings, used i , performed under continuing contract, or ment Center, near Coyote, Calif., and onnection with the discovery, d contracts, with persons who conduct rail sidings at or near Milpitas and wholesale, and retail food establishments, lent, production, refining, manufacture, Snowboy, Calif., for continual movement food brokers, and grocery store estab­ rocessing, storage, transmisa > by rail in interstate service. lishments, the businesses of which are istribution of natural gas and p _ ^ the manufacture, sale and distribution N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, nd their products), from Lone ia of food. No service may be performed in applicant requests it be held at Los Angeles, kind, Tex., to points in Florida, Geo S Calif. the transportation of the commodities nd South Carolina. specified above in bulk, in tank or hopper No. MC 67450 (Sub-No. 10), filed Note: Applicant states th eau th ority t0 vehicles. March 1, 1965. Applicant: PETERLIN pplication is to secure speci in N o te: Applicant states, lie seeks, by this CARTAGE CO., a corporation, 9651 ransport shipper’s complet h t need traight or mixed shipments ^ t h o m ^ application, to amend his present authority South Ewing Avenue, Chicago, HI. A p­ in Permit No. MC 60021, by substituting: (a) plicant’s attorney: Joseph M. Scanlan, f having to determine the purpose : is to be put and fo.’ The phrase “grocery stores” for “chain 111 West Washington Street, Chicago 2, grocery” in the commodity description in f permitting greater ^®xi^ fces f 0r split 4.,iim-t4-ta., rrf annlicant’s services_ ^ r (1) above, and (b ) the restriction set forth HI. Authority sought to operate as a above, in lieu of the present restriction, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over which reads as follows : The operations au­ irregular routes, transporting: Flour, in Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3899 jHphama. or Tennessee and final point of No. MC 84511 (Sub-No. 22), filed No. MC 103880 (Sub-No. 331), filed delivery in one of the States proposed herein March 8, 1965. Applicant: COMMER­ March 8, 1965. Applicant: PRODUC­ to be served. If a hearing is deemed neces­ CIAL FREIGHT LINES, INCORPO­ ERS TRANSPORT, INC., 215 East sary, applicant requests it be held at Dallas, RATED, 1700 West Ninth Avenue, Waterloo Road, Akron, Ohio. Appli­ Tex., or Washington, D.C. Kansas City, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: cant’s attorney: David Axelrod, 39 South No. MC 84511 (Sub-No. 21), filed De­ William J. Boyd, 30 North La Salle La Salle Street, Chicago 3, HI. Author­ cember 28,1964. Applicant: C O M M E R ­ Street, Chicago 2, HI. Authority sought ity sought to operate as a common car­ CIAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., 1700 West to operate as a common carrier, by motor rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Ninth Street, Kansas City, Mo. Appli­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ routes, transporting: Plastic granules, cant’s, attorney: Clarence D. Todd, 1825 ing: Meats, meat products, meat by­ dry, in bulk, in tank or hopper type ve­ Jefferson Place NW ., Washington, D.C., products and articles distributed by meat hicles, from Midland, Mich., to Yardville, 20036. Authority sought to operate as packinghouses, as described in Sections N.J. a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over A and C of Appendix I to the report in N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, regular routes, transporting: Packing­ Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certif­ applicant requests it be held at Lansing, house products, and supplies, restricted icates 61 M.C.C. 209 anjj 766 (except Mich. to items incidental to or directly con­ commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles, No. MC 103880 (Sub-No. 332), filed nected with the business of the slaughter­ and except hides), from points in Dakota March 8, 1965. Applicant: PRODUC­ ing of animals or the preservation or sale County, Nebr., to points in Illinois, Wis­ of meats but not including dairy prod­ consin, Michigan, Missouri, Kansas, ERS TRANSPORT, INC., 215 East Waterloo Road, Akron, Ohio. Appli­ ucts, between Kansas City, Kans., and Oklahoma, Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Chicago, 111., serving the intermediate and Indiana, and rejected and returned cant’s attorney: David Axelrod, 39 South points of Kansas City, Boonville, Colum­ shipments of the above commodities, on La Salle Street, Chicago, 111. Authority bia, Mexico, Louisiana, Chillicothe, Shel- return. sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, bina, Hannibal, and St. Louis, Mo., Jack­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, sonville, Springfield, Bloomington, Joliet, transporting: (1) Anhydrous ammonia applicant requests it be held at Omaha, and fertilizer solutions, in bulk, in tank and East St. Louis, 111., and the off-route Nebr., or Des Moines, Iowa. points of St. Joseph, Trenton, Sedalia, vehicles, and (2) dry fertilizers, in bulk Joplin, Springfield, and Jefferson City, No. MC 92983 (Sub-No. 465), filed (except in dump vehicles) from Erie, 111., Mo., Rock Island, Quincy, Peoria, W ash ­ March 10, 1965. Applicant: ELDON to points in Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, ington, Eureka, Morton, Kankakee, Blue MILLER, INC., Post Office Drawer 617, Wisconsin, and Missouri. Island, Morrison, Grays Lake, Dixon, Kansas City, Mo., 64141, Authority N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, and Freeport, 111., points in the Chicago, sought to operate as a common carrier, applicant -requests it be held at Chicago, IU. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Hi., Commercial Zone, as defined by the No. MC 106398 (Sub-No. 263), filed Commission (other than those within the transporting: Fats and oils, including blends thereof, in bulk, in tank vehicles, March 5, 1965. Applicant: NATIONAL municipal limits of Chicago), points in TRAILER CONVOY, INC., 1925 National the Kansas City, Kans.-Kansas City, from points in Nebraska to points in California, Nevada, and Utah. Plaza, Tulsa, Okla. Authority sought to Mo., Commercial Zone, as defined by the operate as a common carrier, by motor N o te: If a hearing Is deemed necessary, Commission (other than those within the vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ municipal limits of Kansas' City, Mo., applicant requests it be held at Kansas City, Mo. ing: Trailers designed to be drawn by and Kansas City, K ans.), and those in passenger automobiles, in initial move­ Missouri within two miles of the corpo­ No. MC 102343 (Sub-No. 11), filed ments, in truckaway service, from points rate limits of St. Joseph, Mo. (1) from March 1, 1965: Applicantr JOHN in Nash County, N.C., to points in the Kansas City over U.S. Highway 40 to KAUSER, doing business as JOHN United States (except Alaska and junction U.S. Highway 54, thence over KAUSER TRUCKING SERVICE, 850 H a w a ii). U S. Highway 54 to junction Ü.S. H igh­ West Harrison Street, Paulding, Ohio. N ote : If a hearing is deemed necessary, way 36, thence over U.S. Highway 36 to Applicant’s attorney: James M. Burtch, Springfield, 111,, and thence over U.S. applicant requests it be held at Raleigh or 44 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio, Charlotte, N.C. ignway 66 to Chicago, and return over 43215. Authority sought to operate as ¡2 same route; (2) from Kansas City a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over No. MC 106603 (Sub-No. 75), filed SJ*-8- Highway 69 to junction U.S. irregular routes, transporting: Fertilizer, March 2, 1965. Applicant: DIRECT highway 36, thence over U.S. Highway in bags, from points in Jackson Town­ TRANSIT LINES, INC., 200 Colrain thp«° lUnction H.S. Highway 66, and ship, Paulding County, Ohio, to points in Street SW„ Grand Rapids, Mich. Ap­ t0 Chicago as specified above, and Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan. plicant’s attorney: Rex Eames, 1800B uhl °Z e/ the same route; (3) from Building, Detroit,'Mich., 48226. Author­ N o te: I f a hearing is deemed necessary, h S LClty over u -s - Highway 40 to St. applicant requests it be held at Columbus, ity sought to operate as a common car­ thence over U.S. Highway 66 Ohio. rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Altmî^f TTld’ Hi- (also from junction routes, transporting: Dry chemicals, in tj o Jî'i® H.S. Highway 40 and bypass No. MC 102567 (Sub-No. 102), filed bulk, from St. Louis, Mich., and points fom«o way 67 near Pattonville, Mo., March 1, 1965. Applicant: EARL within five (5) miles thereof, to points Iny S^own as junction U.S. H igh­ CLARENCE GIBBON, doing business as in Delaware, * Hlinois, Indiana, Iowa, way a? *nd.67* over By-Pass U.S. H igh - EARL GIBBON PETROLEUM TRANS­ Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, thenr* J ° ¿unction. U.S. Highway 67, PORT, 235 Benton Road, Bossier City, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New La. Applicant’s attorney: Jo E. Shaw, York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Alternate u s Sw ^ K hWay 67 to junction Bettes Building, Houston, Tex. Au­ Alternate n i* S -g5way 67■ thence °ver Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. ville tu 6 Highway 67 to Jackson- thority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular N o te: I f a hearing is deemed necessary, to Snrw* £nce ever U.S. Highway 36 applicant requests it be held at Lansing, routes, transporting: (a) Phosphatic ¿ o f ? 5 L)* and ^ence to Chi- Mich. fertilizer solutions and (b ) fertilizer sesame route? above’ and retum over compounds (manufactured), dry, in No. MC 107002 (Sub-No. 239), filed bulk, in tank and hopper vehicles, from March 9, 1965. Applicant: HEARIN- operate fr^!iCan^ now holds authority to the plant sites of National Phosphate MILLER TRANSPORTERS, INC., Post above tramnrJ1- î ° the points specified Office Box 1123, Highway 80 West, Jack- ties. The tlle identical commodi- Corp., approximately 4 miles north of tioa is to iL ,pose of the instant applica- Hahnville, La., to points in Alabama, son, Miss., 39205. Applicant’s attorney: abeadyh e l d ^ ^ authority, if such is not Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Louisi­ E. Stephen HeiSley, Transportation b^bouses transport “supplies” to pack- ana, Oklahoma, Missouri, Tennessee, and Building, Washington, D.C., 20006. Au­ premises -nvii not slauShter meats on Texas. thority sought to operate as a common Paniefl bv a V» "1, application was accom- carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular big is d e m J r°ti0~n t0 dismiss. If a hear- N o te: If a hearing Is deemed necessary, t be held »+ T?ecessary> applicant requests applicant requests it be held at New Orleans, routes, transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, a at Kansas City, Mo. La. from points in Calcasieu Parish, La., to No. 57-___7 3900 NOTICES

points in the United States (except Alas­ and points within ten (10) miles thereof, No. M C 109637 (Sub-No. 276), filed ka and Hawaii). to points in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, M arch 3, 1965. Applicant: SOUTHERN N ote: Applicant states no duplication of Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, T A N K LIN E S, INC., 4107 Bells Lane authority is sought. If a hearing is deemed Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Mon­ Louisville, Ky., 40211. Authority sought necessary, applicant requests it be held at tana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Da­ to operate as a common carrier, by motor New Orleans, La. kota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 107107 (Sub-No. 337), filed Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, ing: Chemicals, dry, in bulk, from Iron- and Wyoming. March 1, 1965. Applicant: ALTERMAN ton and South Point, Ohio, to points in T R A N S P O R T LIN E S, INC., Post Office N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Kentucky and West Virginia. Box 458, Allapattah Station, Miami, applicant requests it be held at Wichita, N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Fla., 33142. Authority sought to operate Kans. applicant requests it be held at Louisville, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, No. MC 108207 (Sub-No. 151), filed Ky., or Washington, D.C. over irregular routes, transporting: March 9, 1965. Applicant: FROZEN No. M C 109823 (Sub-No. 2), filed Meats, meat products, meat "byproducts, FOOD EXPRESS, a corporation, 318 M arch 10, 1965. Applicant: MaGAU- and articles distributed by meat pack­ Cadiz Street, Dallas, Tex. Authority GHEY BROS., INC., Third and Perry inghouses (except hides and commod­ sought to operate as a common carrier, Streets, Lettsdale, Pa. Applicant’s at­ ities in bulk, in tank vehicles), from by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, torney: Arthur J. Diskin, 302 Prick points in Dakota County, Nebr., to points transporting: Frozen foods, from Belvi- Building, Pittsburgh 19, Pa. Authority in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North dere, 111., to points in Kansas. sought to operate as a common carrier, Carolina, and South Carolina. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Kansas City, transporting: Iron and steel articles, be­ applicant requests it be held at Des Moines, Mo. tween Pittsburgh and Aliquippa, Pa., on Iowa, or Omaha, Nebr. the one hand, and, on the other, points No. MC 108518 (Sub-No. 5), filed in the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. No. MC 107107 (Sub-No. 338), filed March 2, 1965. Applicant: IRON & March 1, 1965. Applicant: ALTERMAN STEEL TRANSPORT,«INC., 2001 Shep- N o t e : I f a hearing is deemed necessary, TRANSPORT LINES, INC., Post Office ler Church Road SW., Canton, Ohio. applicant requests it be held at Washington, D.C. Box 458, Allapattah Station, Miami, Fla., Applicant’s attorney: Ernie Adamson, 33142. Authority sought to operate as a Middleburg, Va. Authority sought to No. M C 109821 (Sub-No. 20), filed common carrier, by motor vehicle, over operate as a common carrier, by motor M arch 8, 1965. Applicant: H. W. irregular routes, transporting: Meats, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ T A Y N T O N COM PANY, INC., 40 Main meat products, and meat byproducts, ing: iron and steel articles and equip­ Street, Wellsboro, Pa. Applicant’s at­ from Garden City, Kans., and points ment and supplies used or useful in the torney: Robert DeKroyft, Woolworth within ten (10) miles thereof, to points production and distribution of such Building, 233 Broadway, New York 7, in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North articles, between the site of the Bethle­ N.Y. Authority sought to operate as a Carolina, and South Carolina. hem Steel Co., Burns Harbor plant lo­ Common carrier, by motor vehicle, over N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, cated in Porter County, Ind., on the one irregular routes, transporting: Manu­ applicant requests it be held at Washington, hand, and, on the other, points in Mich­ factured glass products and commodities D.O, igan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and equipment used in the manufacture, New York, and Illinois. sale, and shipment of manufactured glass No. MC -107403 (Sub-No. 614), filed products, between Paden City, W. Va., March 2, 1965. Applicant: MATLACK, N o te: I f a hearing is deemed necessary, INC., 10 West Baltimore Avenue, Lans- applicant does not specify place of hearing. and Charleroi, Pa. N ote: Applicant states that the proposed downe, Pa. Authority sought to operate No. MC 109132 (Sub-No. 19), filed as a Common carrier, by motor vehicle, operation is for joinder or tacking at March 10, 1965. Applicant: FREIGHT Charleroi, Pa., with authority held under over irregular routes, transporting: Pig WAYS, INC., 1309 North Mosley, Post Docket No. MC 109821 Sub 5, between Bitf- iron, in bulk, in dump vehicles, from Office Box 605, Wichita, Kans., 67201. falo, Corning, Elmira, and Horseheads, N-i., Detroit, Mich., to points in that part of Applicant’s representative: H. L. Rose, Boyertown, Bradford, Charleroi, Port Alle­ Ohio on and west of a line beginning at Post Office Box 605, Wichita, Kans., gany, and Wellsboro, Pa., and Fairmont ana Sheffield Lake, Ohio, thence in a south­ 67201. Authority sought to operate as Parkersburg, W. Va., on the one hand, ana, on the other, points in Connecticut, Indiana, erly direction over Ohio Highway 301 to a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over the junction of Ohio Highway 301 and Kentucky, Massachusetts, New Jersey, * irregular routes, transporting: Meats, York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Maud, ana Interstate Highway 71, thence south­ meat products, meat byproducts, dairy West Virginia (except that no traffic shall oe westerly over Interstate Highway 71 to products, and articles distributed by transported between Bradford and Columbus, Ohio, thence in a southerly meat packinghouses, from Garden City, Allegany, Pa., on the one hand, and, o direction over U.S. Highway 23 to Ports­ Kans., to points in Illinois, Indiana, other, points in that part of New York o mouth, Ohio. Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. west of a line beginning at Oswego, N. ., _ extending along New York Highway N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Syracuse, N.Y., and thence along U.S. nig applicant requests it be held at Washington, applicant requests it be held at Wichita, way 11 to the New York-PennsylvaniaState DC. Kans., or Washington, D.C. line). Between Central Falls, U.I., No. MC 107839 (Sub-No. 62), filed one hand, and, on the other, points No. MC 109479 (Sub-No. 11) , filed ana, Kentucky, New York (excep^ P° a March 3, 1965. Applicant: DENVER- M arch 4,1965. Applicant: A. F. C O M E R ALBUQUERQUE MOTOR TRANSPORT, in that part of New York on and ada TRANSPORT SERVICE, INC.-PLANT- line beginning at the United States- INC., 5135 Yprk, Denver, Colo. Appli­ ERS NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST international boundary line and N y cant’s attorney: Duane W. Acklie, Box COMPANY, ADMINISTRATOR, Post along New York Highway 10 to D® P ^ ^ ' ^ 2028, Lincoln, Nebr., 68501. Authority Office Box 71, Rocky Mount, N.C. Appli­ and thence along unnumbered the New York-Pennsylvania State .in , “ sought to operate as a common carrier, cant’s attorney: Louis Reznek, 5009 Oquaga Lake, N .Y.), Ohio, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Keokuk Street, Washington 16, D.C. transporting: Meat, meat products, and cept points in the Philadelphia, T^n), Authority sought to operate as a common meat byproducts, dairy products, arti­ mercial Zone, as defined by the C rfeemed and West Virginia. If a hearing_ is “ &t cles distributed by meat packinghouses, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Urea, dry, in bulk, necessary applicant requests it and such commodities as are used by Elmira, N.Y., or Syracuse, N.Y. meatpackers in the conduct of their in tank and hopper type vehicles, from business when destined to and for use by Wilmington, N.C., and points within No. MC 110420 (Sub-No. meatpackers, as described in Sections twenty-five (25) miles thereof, to points March 1, 1965. Applicant: QUa ^ A, B, C, and D of Appendix I to the re­ in North Carolina, South Carolina, and C A R R IE R S , INC., Post Office B ^ port in Descriptions of Motor Carrier Virginia. 100 South Calumet Street, Bur Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (ex­ Wis. Applicant’s r^ resentaiT rlington, N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, cept hides, and commodities in bulk, in applicant requests it be held at Raleigh, H. Figge, Post Office Box J39’ ®Lateas a nrio AnfVirvrit.V SOUght tO Ope tank vehicles), from Garden City, Kans., N.C., or Washington, D.C. Thursday, M atch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3901 common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and able securities) under continuing con­ irregular routes, transporting: Com ­ Texas. tracts with banks and banking institu­ tions only, namely, National banks, State modities, in bulk, having a prior or sub­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, sequent movement by water or rail, be­ applicant requests It be held at Houston, banks, Federal Reserve banks, savings tween points in Arkansas, Colorado, Tex. and loan associations, and savings banks, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, K en­ between Danville, 111., on the one hand, No. MC 112223 (Sub-No. 70), flled and, on the other, Indianapolis, Ind. tucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, March 15, 1965. Applicant: QUICKIE Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, N e­ Applicant also holds temporary author­ TRANSPORT COMPANY, a corporation, ity to conduct operations as a common braska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, 501 11th Avenue South, Minneapolis, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, W is­ carrier in MC 111729 and subs there­ Minn. Applicant’s attorney: Earl Hack­ under. consin, and Wyoming. ing, 503 11th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Minn., 55415. Authority sought to oper­ N ote: If a hearing Is deemed necessary, applicant requests It be held at Chicago, 111. applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111. ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ No. MC 110420 (Sub-No. 423), filed hicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 112750 (Sub-No. 211), filed March 8, 1965. Applicant: Q U A L IT Y ing: Commodities in bulk, having a prior March 9, 1965. Applicant: ARMORED CARRIERS, INC.,' 100 South Calumet or subsequent movement by rail.and/or C A R R IE R C O R P O R A T IO N , 222-17 Street, Burlington, W is. Applicant’s water, between points in Minnesota and Northern Boulevard, Bayside, N.Y. Ap­ representative: Fred H. Figge, Post Office Wisconsin. plicant’s attorney: Russell S. Bernhard, Box 339, Burlington, Wis. Authority N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Commonwealth Building, 1625 K Street sought to operate as a common carrier, applicant requests it be held at Minneapolis, NW., Washington 6, D.Ç. Authority by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Minn. sought to operate as a contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Chemicals and solvents, in No. MC 112449 (Sub-No. 2), filed transporting: Commercial papers, docu­ bulk, in tank vehicles, from Savage, March 1, 1965. Applicant: RAYMOND ments and written instruments, includ­ Minn., and points within five (5) miles BOLLINGER, Rural Delivery No. 2, ing originals and copies of checks, drafts, thereof, to points in Illinois, Indiana, Schuylkill Haven, Pa. Applicant’s attor­ notes, money orders, travelers’ checks, and Wisconsin. ney: Christian V. Graf, 407 North Front and canceled bonds, and accounting pa­ Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Street, Harrisburg, Pa. Authority sought applicant requests it be held at Minneapolis, to operate as a common carrier, by motor pers relating thereto, including originals and copies of cash letters, letters of Minn. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ transmittal, summary sheets, adding ma­ ing: Coal, from points in the Townships No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 711) , filed chine tapes, deposit records, withdrawal March 9, 1965. Applicant: C H E M IC A L of Washington, Williams, and Wiconisco, Dauphin County, and those in the Town­ slips, and debit and credit records (ex­ LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 East cept coin, currency, bullion, and nego­ Lancaster Avenue, Downington, Pa. A p­ ship of Cold Spring, Lebanon County, Pa., to New Brunswick, N.J., and points tiable securities), under continuing con­ plicant’s attorneys: Leonard A. Jaskie- tracts with banks and banking institu­ wicz, Madison Building, 1155 15th Street in New Jersey within 35 miles of New tions only, namely, National banks, State NW., Washington, D.C., 20005, and Ed­ Brunswick. banks,'Federal Reserve banks, savings win H. van Deusen, 520 East Lancaster N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, and loan associations, and savings banks, Avenue, Downington, Pa. Authority applicant requests it be held at Harrisburg, (1) between Cleveland, Ohio, on the one sought to operate as a common carrier, Pa. hand, and, on the other, Fort Wayne, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, No. MC 112588 (Sub-No. 9), flled Ind., and (2) between Buffalo, N.Y., on transporting: Boron trifluoride gas, in March 8, 1965. Applicant: RUSSELL the one hand, and, on the other, Cincin­ bulk, from Marcus Hook, Pa., to Tusca­ TRUCKING LINE, INC., 1820 Milan nati, Ohio, and Detroit, Mich. loosa, Ala., Marshall, HI., Lafayette, Ind., Road, Sandusky, Ohio. Applicants at­ N o te: Applicant holds temporary author­ Louisville, Ky„ Bayway and Grasselli, torney : John P. McMahon, 44 East Broad NJ., and Model City, N.Y. ity to conduct operations as a common car­ Street, Columbus, Ohio, 43215. Au­ rier in MC 111729 and subs thereunder. If Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, thority sought to operate as a common a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ applicant requests it be held at Washington, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular quests it be held at Cleveland, Ohio. routes, transporting: (1) Cement, from No. MC 112838 (Sub-No. 1), filed Wampum, Pa., to points in Ohio except ..No- MC 110988 (Sub-No. 120), filed January 22, 1965. Applicant: PHILA.- “^rch 9( 1965, Applicant: KAMPO those points on and north of U.S. High­ NEW JERSEY EXPRESS, INC., 4170 Al­ TRANSIT, INC., 200 West Cecil Street, way 50 and on and east of U.S. Highway mond Street, Philadelphia, Pa. Author­ eenah, Wis. Applicant’s attorney: 23, and (2) empty returned containers ity sought to operate as a common car­ tj' Stephen Heisley, Transportation for cement from the above specified des­ rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular tination points to Wampum, Pa. ’ Washington, D.C., 20006. Au- routes, transporting: General commodi­ rnrw ^P^ht to operate as a common N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, ties (except those of unusual value, mer, by motor vehicle, over irregular applicant requests it be held at Columbus, Classes A and B explosives, household ™uxes, transporting: Acids, chemicals, Ohio. goods as defined by the Commission, Eact and fertilizer ingredients from No. MC 112750 (Sub-No. 210), filed commodities in bulk and commodities re­ S ^ buque- m - Points in Hli- March 9, 1965. Applicant: ARMORED quiring special . equipment), between m jJ h m iO miles thereof, to points in C A R R IE R C O R P O R A T IO N , 222-17 Toms River, N.J., on the one hand, and, smiri ^ ’Jnaiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Mis- Northern Boulevard, Bayside, N.Y. Ap­ on the other, points in New-Jersey. Wisconsin513^ 8’, ®ou^ Dakota, and plicant’s attorney: Russell S. Bernhard, N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Commonwealth Building, 1625 K Street applicant requests it be held at Philadel­ apoUpaT,*1! a hearing is deemed necessary, NW., Washington 6, D.C. Authority phia, Pa. equests it be held at Chicago, 111, sought to operate as a contract carrier, No. MC 113459 (Sub-No. 28), filed by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, « S h M s e s 11^ 0 ,(.Sub-N o - 17). flled March 5, 1965. Applicant: H. J. JEF­ transporting: Commercial papers, docu­ Port APPhcant: OIL TRANS- FRIES TRUCK LINE, INC., 4720 South ments and written instruments, includ­ %hwav°finP ’ a corPoration, East Shields Boulevard, Oklahoma City 29, Abileney P ° St ° ® ce Draw er 2679, ing originals and copies of checks, drafts, Okla. Applicant’s attorney: James W. Jerrv Applicant’s attorney: notes, money orders, travelers’ checks, Hightower, Wynnewood Professional p 12th ^oor, Capital Na- and canceled bonds, and accounting pa­ Building, Dallas 24, Tex. Authority pers relating thereto, including originals b t o S T “ “ ®' AUSOn’ Tex' A u" sought to operate as a common carrier, carrier h operate as a common and■ copies of cash letters, letters of by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, routes ’ tZ motor vehicle, over irregular transmittal, summary sheets, adding ma­ transporting: Iron and steel rock bolts hom t^ S nSPOrting: Sulphur, in bulk, chine tapes, deposit records, withdrawal and wedges; and, nuts, washers, and PointsT8-Hopkins County, Tex., tc slips, and debit and credit records (ex­ expansion anchors used in connection Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, cept coin, currency, bullion and negoti­ therewith, from Minnequa and Pueblo, 3902 NOTICES

Colo., to points in Arkansas, Illinois, In­ Arkansas, Louisiana, and Kansas and PO O LE , doing business as POOLE diana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisi­ Kansas City, Mo. T R U C K L IN E , Post Office Box 310, Ever­ ana, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, New No t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, green, Ala. Applicant’s representative: Mexico, Oklahoma, Ohio, Tennessee, applicant requests it be held at Columbus, Robert E. Tate, 2031 Ninth Avenue South, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin, West Virginia, Ohio. Birmingham, Ala. Authority sought to and Wyoming, and damaged and re­ operate as a common carrier, by motor No. MC 114045 (Sub-No. 175), filed jected shipments, on return. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ March 1, 1965. Applicant: TRANS­ N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, ing : Canned goods, from points in Michi­ COLD EXPRESS, INC., Post Office Box gan, to points in Georgia. applicant requests it be held at Oklahoma 5842, Dallas, Tex. Authority sought to City, Okla. operate as a common carrier, by motor N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, No. MC 113514 (Sub-No. 91), filed vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ applicant requests it be held at Grand Rapids or Lansing, Mich. March 8, 1965. Applicant: SMITH ing: Food products (other than frozen), TRANSIT, INC., a corporation, 305 Si­ from points in Texas to points in Ten­ No. M C 115331 (Sub-No. 101) mons Building, Dallas, Tex. Applicant’s nessee (except Memphis), Kentucky, Vir­ (A M E N D M E N T ), filed February 15, attorney: W. D. White, 2420 Republic ginia, West Virginia, Connecticut, Dela­ 1965, published F ederal R egister issue National Bank Building, Dallas, Tex. ware, District of Columbia, Maryland, of M arch 3, 1965, amended March 8, Authority sought to operate as a common Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New 1965, and republished as amended this carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode issue. Applicant: TRUCK TRANS­ routes, transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, Island, and Vermont. PORT, INCORPORATED, 707 Market between points in St. Charles Parish, La., No t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, Street, St. Louis, Mo. Authority sought on the one hand, and, on the other, applicant requests it be held at Dallas, Tex. to operate as a common carrier, by motor points in the United States (except vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Alaska and Hawaii). No. MC 114389 (Sub-No. 9), filed ing: Anhydrous ammonia, nitrogen March 1, 1965. Applicant: GALE B. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, fertilizers, ammoniating solutions, and applicant requests it beheld at New Orleans, ALEXANDER, 120 South Ward Street, aqua ammonia, in bulk, in tank vehicles, La. Ottumwa, Iowa. Applicant’s represent­ from the plant site of Southern Nitro­ ative:. Kenneth F. Dudley, 901 South gen, Inc., located at or near Columbia No. MC 113678 (Sub-No. 110), filed Madison Avenue, Post Office Box 279, Park (Finney), Hamilton County, Ohio, March 8, 1965. Applicant: CURTIS, Ottumwa, Iowa. Authority sought to to points in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, INC., 770 East 51st Avenue, Denver, operate as a contract carrier, by motor and the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. Colo., 80216. Applicant’s attorney: vehicle over irregular routes, transport­ Duane W. Acklie, Post Office Box 2028, N o t e : The purpose of this republication ing: Malt beverages, in containers, from is to add Kentucky as a destination State, Lincoln, Nebr. Authority sought to op­ St. Paul, Minn., to Kirksville, Mo., under erate as a common carrier, by motor I f a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant a continuing contract or contracts with requests it be held at St. Louis, Mo., or Cin­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ North Missouri Beverage Co., Inc. cinnati, Ohio. ing: Meats, meat products, meat by­ products, dairy products, and articles No t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, No. M C 115331 (Sub-No. 113), filed applicant requests it be held at Des Moines, M arch 8, 1965. Applicant: TRUCK distributed by meat packinghouses, as Iowa. described in Sections A, B, and C, of Ap­ TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED, 707 pendix I to the report in Descriptions in No. MC 114457 (Sub-No. 29), filed Market Street, St. Louis, Mo. Authority M otor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. March 8, 1965. Applicant: DART sought to operate as a common carrier, 209, and 766 (except commodities in TRANSIT COMPANY, a corporation, 780 by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, bulk, in tank vehicles), between Greeley North Prior Avenue, St. Paul, Minn. transporting: Yeast and blends and de­ and Denver, Colo. Applicant’s attorney: Charles W . Singer, rivatives thereof, from Bonne Terre, Tower Suite 3600, 33 North La Salle Mo., to points in the United States (ex­ N ote: Applicant states the sole purpose of the instant application is for tacking with Street, Chicago, HI. Authority sought to cept Alaska, Houston, Tex., and points existing authority held in Docket No. MC operate as a common carrier, by motor within 50 miles of Hawaii, Michigan, 113678. If a hearing is deemed necessary, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ and O h io ). applicant requests it be held at Denver, Colo. ing: Glassware> bottles, and containers, N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, No. MC 113678 (Sub-No. Ill), filed from the plant site of the Anchor Hock­ applicant requests it be held at St. Louis, Mo. March 8, 1965. Applicant: CURTIS, ing Glass Co., located at Gurnee, 111., to points in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, No. M C 115331 (Sub-No. 114), filed INC., 770 East 51st Avenue, Denver, Colo., M arch 11, 1965. Applicant: TRUCK and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, 80216. Applicant’s attorney: Duane W. TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED, 707 Acklie, Post Office Box 2028, Lincoln, and used pallets, rejected and defective bottles and containers, on return. M arket Street, St. Louis, Mo. Authority Nebr. Authority sought to operate as sought to operate as a common carrier, a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over No t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, irregular routes, transporting: Meats, applicant requests it be held at Washington, transporting: Feed and feed ingredients, meat products, dairy products, and ar­ DC. materials, equipment, and supplies, usea ticles distributed by meat packinghouses, No. MC 115038 (Sub-No. 3), filed or useful in the manufacture, mixing, as described in Sections A, B, and C of March 1, 1965. Applicant: VAUPEL and sale of these commodities, between Appendix I to the report in Descriptions TRANSPORTATION, INC., doing busi­ points in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mic - in M otor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. ness as VAUPEL TRANSPORTATION, gan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin, Louis­ 209 and 766 (except liquids in bulk in Davis Junction, 111. Applicant’s attor­ ville, Ky., and St. Louis, Mo. tank vehicles), from Greeley, Colo., to ney: Joseph M. Scanlan, 111 West Wash­ points in North Dakota and South ington Street, Chicago 2, 111. Authority Dakota. sought to operate as a common carrier, or Chicago, 111. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, o. M C 115491 (Sub-No. 55), filed applicant requests it be held at Lincoln, transporting: (1) M eat scraps, and tank­ ruary 26, 1965. Applicant: c o m Nebr. age, from Rochelle, 111., to points in W is­ RCIAL CARRIER CORPORATION, No. MC 114045 (Sub-No. 173), filed consin and Indiana, and (2) feed and East Bridgers Avenue, Auburndaie, feed ingredients, (a) from Muscatine, March 3, 1965. Applicant: TRANS­ Applicant’s attorney: M- C O LD E X PR ESS, INC., Post Office Box Iowa, to points in Illinois, and (b) from isey, 223 South FloridaAvenu- Rockford, 111., to points in Indiana. 5842, Dallas, Tex. Authority sought to wer J, Lakeland, Fla., 338(J V ^ n operate as a common carrier, by motor No t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, ity sought to operate as a c , f vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111. ier, by motor vehicle, over irregular ing: Food products, from Columbus, No. MC 115162 (Sub-No. 110), filed ;es, transporting: Frozen food, f Ohio, to points in Texas, Oklahoma, March 5, 1965. Applicant: WALTER Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3903

olina, Virginia, M aryland, and the Dis­ Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, stock, from Manchester, Iowa, to Oak trict of Columbia. Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. Creek, Wis. Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, N o te: I f a hearing is deemed necessary, N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Columbus, applicant requests it be held at Wichita, applicant requests it be held at Milwaukee, Ohio. Kans. Wis. No. MC 115491 (Sub-No. 57), filed No. MC 115841 (Sub-No. 226), filed No. MC 116564 (Sub-No. 15), filed February 26, 1965. Applicant: C O M ­ March 1, 1965. Applicant: COLONIAL March 9, 1965. Applicant: LEWIS W. MERCIAL CARRIER CORPORATION, REFRIGERATED TRANSPORTATION, McCURDY AND MARGARET J. MC­ 502 East Bridgers Avenue, Aubumdale, INC., 1215 Bankhead Highway West, CURDY, a partnership, doing business Fla. Applicant’s attorney: M. Craig Post Office Box 2169, Birmingham, Ala. as McCURDY’S TRUCKING CO., 571 Massey, 223 South Florida Avenue, Authority sought to operate as a com­ Unity Street, Latrobe, Pa. Applicant’s Drawer J, Lakeland, Fla., 33802. A u ­ mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ attorney ;~-Paul F. Sullivan, B arr Build­ thority sought to operate as a common regular routes, transporting:. Bakery ing, 910 17th Street NW., Washington, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular goods (unfrozen), in vehicles equipped D.C. Authority sought to operate as a routes, transporting: Fruits, crushed, with mechanical refrigeration, from contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over drained, glazed, candied, crystallized, or Seelyville, Ind., and Carrollton, Mo., to irregular routes, transporting: M alt bev­ stuffed, from Plant City and Lakeland points in Kentucky, Georgia, Alabama, erages, in containers, from Latrobe, Pa., City, Fla., to points in the United States Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, to points in Siissex County, Del., and to (except points in Alaska, Hawaii, and Virginia, and Tennessee. points in New York (except Jamestown Florida). N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, and Hornell, N. Y.). Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Birmingham, N o te: Applicant states the proposed serv­ applicant requests it be held at Tampa, Fla. Ala. ice to be restricted to a service to be per­ formed under a continuing contract, or No. MC 115491 (Sub-No. 58), filed No. MC 116254 (Sub-No. 52), filed contracts, with Latrobe Brewing Co. If a March 9, 1965. Applicant: C O M M E R ­ March 3, 1965. Applicant: CHEM- hearing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ CIAL CARRIER CORPORATION, 502 HAULERS, INC., Post Office Box 245, quests it be held at Pittsburgh, Pa. Sheffield, Ala. Applicant’s attorney: East Bridgers Avenue, Auburndale, Fla. No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 201), filed Applicant’s attorney: M. Craig Massey, Walter Harwood, 515 Nashville Bank & Trust Building, Nashville, Tenn, Au­ March 1, 1965. Applicant: WILLIS 223 South Florida Avenue, Drawer J, SHAW FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., Elm Lakeland, Fla. Authority sought to op­ thority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Springs, Ark. Applicant’s attorney: erate as a common carrier, by motor John H. Joyce, 26 North College, Fayette­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ routes, transporting: Chemicals, in bulk, from Barfield, Ark., and points within ville, Ark. Authority sought to operate ing: Clay, from Edgar, Fla., to points in as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, ten (10) miles thereof, to points in Ala­ Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, and over irregular routes, transporting: Illinois. bama, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Frozen foods, from Fairmont and Win­ Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Oklahoma, nebago, Minn., to points in Idaho, Ore­ applicant requests it be held at Jacksonville gon, Washington, California, Nevada, or Tampa, Fla. Tennessee, Texas on and east of U.S. Highway 281 and on and north of U.S. Utah, and Montana. No. MC 115826 (Sub-No. 48), filed Highway 87, ahd Wisconsin, restricted N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, March 1,1965. Applicant : W . J. D IG B Y , against the transportation of nitrogen applicant requests it be held at Minneapolis, INC., Post Office Box 5088 T.A., Denver, fertilizer solution from the site of the Minn. Colo., 80217. Authority sought to oper­ storage and production facilities of the No. MC 117119 (Sub-No. 203), filed ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ Allied Chemical Corp., at or near Blythe- March 8, 1965. Applicant: WILLIS hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: ville, Ark., to points in Illinois, Missis­ SHAW FROZEN EXPRESS, INC., Elm Meats, méat products, meat byproducts, sippi, Missouri, and Tennessee. Springs, Ark. Applicant’s attorney: and dairy products and articles distrib­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, John H. Joyce, 26 North College, Fayette­ uted by meat packinghouses (except in applicant requests it be held at Memphis, ville, Ark. Authority sought to operate in tank vehicles), from El Paso, Tenn. as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Tex., to points in Alabama, Florida, over irregular routes, transporting: North Carolina, South Carolina, No. MC 116325 (Sub-No. 23), filed Frozen foods', from Braddock and Lake and Tennessee (except M em phis). March 3, 1965. Applicant: JENNINGS B O ND , doing business as B O N D E N T E R ­ City, Pa., to points in Indiana, Illinois, If a hearing is deemed necessary, PRISES, Post Office Box 185, Lutesville, Missouri, Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Tex Can* re9uests it be held at San Antonio, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: Herman W. South Dakota, and Fargo, N. Dak. Huber, 101 East High Street, Jefferson N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, No MC 115826 (Sub-No. 49), fil< City, Mo., Authority sought to operate applicant requests it be held at Pittsburgh, mnCh} ’ 1965* Applicant: W. J. DIGB' as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, Pa. Póst Office Box 5088 T.A., Denve over irregular routes, transporting: Iron No. MC 118173 (Sub-No. 2), filed nt* Authority sought to ope and steel articles, from Sedalia and Jef­ , as a common carrier, by motor v ferson City, Mo., to points in Minnesota, March 8, 1965. Applicant: DON M o Mon* 0ver to^sulftr routes, transporto] Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, ADEN COMPANY, a corporation, Box iintJ',Jn-ea* P^ducts, and meat byproi Iowa, Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, 608, Gordonville, Tex. Applicant’s at­ rjjs, dairy products, articles distribuí Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma, torney: Homer R. Caston, Jr., 421 North ron**?- packin9houses, and such con Kansas, Colorado, and Nebraska. Crockett, Sherman, Tex. Authority tho tiesj ls are used by meatpackers N o te: If a hearing Is deemed necessary, sought to operate as a common carrier, ° f their business wh( applicant requests it be held at Jefferson by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, j " to and for use by meatpackei City, Mo. transporting: Mineral blocks, protein 2 £ * ** # ■ in Sections A, B, C, and No. MC 116414 (Sub-No. 2), filed blocks, and bagged minerals, from tio»oP^en^lx 1 ^he report in Descri; Durant, Okla., to points in New Mexico, M r o \ ™ otor Carrier Certificates, j March 3, 1965. Applicant: WILLIAM Arizona, Colorado, Nebraska, Oregon, cornrn^J-?9 and 766 (except hides ai G . M cCR OSSEN, doing business as' M c- S F & t e * ln bulk, in tank vehicles CROSSEN CARTAGE COMPANY, 6550 Kansas, Texas, Missouri, Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, California, Arkan­ withm^ar<^e^ City* K ans-> and poin West Forest Home Avenue, Milwaukee, in AiaK^en miles thereof, to poin Wis. Authority sought to operate as a sas, Utah, and Wyoming. Kenhíuma’ Arkansas, Florida, Georgi common carrier, by motor vehicle, over N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nor irregular routes, transporting: Glue applicant requests it be held at Dallas, Tex. 3904 NOTICES

No. MC 118831 (Sub-No. 38), filed Burlington, Wis. Applicant’s represent­ tinuing easterly along the projection of March 1, 1965. Applicant: CENTRAL ative: Fred H. Figge, Post Office Box 339, last said course to its intersection with TRANSPORT, INCORPORATED, Post Burlington, Wis. Authority sought to Belmont (or Angelo) Creek; thence Office Box 5044, H igh Point, N.C. A p ­ operate as a common carrier, by motor northeasterly along Belmont (or Angelo) plicant’s attorney: E. Stephen Heisley, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Creek to Seal Creek; thence westerly and Transportation Building, Washington, ing: Foodstuffs, from Coloma and Eau northerly to a point 1 mile south of Toll D.C. Authority sought to operate as a Claire, Mich., to points in Iowa, Minne­ Bridge Road; thence easterly along an common carrier, by motor vehicle, over sota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, imaginary line 1 mile southerly and par­ irregular routes, transporting: Urea, in South Dakota, and Wisconsin. alleling Toll Bridge Road and San Mateo bulk, which has had a prior movement N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Bridge and Mt. Eden Road to its inter­ by water, from Wilmington, N.C., to applicant requests it be held at Des Moines, section with State Sign Route 17; thence points in North Carolina. Iowa. continuing easterly and northeasterly N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, along an imaginary line 1 mile south and No. "MC 119767 (Sub-No. 60), filed applicant requests it be held at Raleigh, N.C. southeasterly of and paralleling Mt. Eden March 3, 1965. Applicant: BEAVER Road and Jackson Road to its intersec­ No. MC 119268 (Sub-No. 49), filed TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, 100 tion with an imaginary line 1 mile March 1, 1965. Applicant: OSBORN, South Calumet Street, Burlington, Wis. easterly of and paralleling State Sign INC., 228 North Fourth Street, Gadsden, Applicant’s representative: Fred H. Route 9; thence northerly along said Ala. Applicant’s representative: M. H. Figge, Post Office Box 339, Burlington, imaginary line 1 mile easterly of and Stephens (address same as applicant). Wis. Authority sought to operate as a paralleling State Sign Route 9 to its in­ Authority sought to operate as a com­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over tersection with “B ” Street, Hayward; mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ irregular routes, transporting: Plastic thence easterly and northerly along “B” regular routes, transporting : Cotton, tile, accessories, and supplies, incidental Street to Center Street; thence northerly textiles and textile products, made of to, and moving in conjunction therewith, along Center Street to Castro Valley natural or synthetic fibers, metallic yarn, from points in Franklin County, Ohio, to Boulevard; thence westerly along Castro or mixtures thereof, metallic yarn, rugs, points in Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, Valley Boulevard to Redwood Road; carpeting products and manufactured South Dakota, Wisconsin, and the Upper thence northerly along Redwood Road textile products, from points in Georgia, Peninsula of Michigan. to W illiam Street; thence westerly along and Chattanooga, Tenn., to points in N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, W illiam Street and 168th Avenue to Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, applicant requests it be held at Minneapolis, Foothill Boulevard; northwesterly along N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Minn. Foothill Boulevard to the southerly applicant requests it be held at Chattanooga, boundary line of the city of Oakland; Tenn. No. MC 120119 (Sub-No. 2), filed Feb­ ruary 25, 1965. Applicant: ENCINAL thence easterly and northerly along the No. M C 119702 (Sub-N o. 15) (A M E N D ­ TERMINALS, Foot of Jay Street, Ala­ Oakland boundary line to its intersection MENT) , filed February 5, 1965, pub­ meda, Calif. Applicant’s attorney: R. with the Alameda-Contra Costa County lished F ederal R egister issue of M arch Frederic Fisher, 311 California Street, boundary line; 3, 1965, amended M arch 11, 1965, and San Francisco, Calif., 94104. Authority Thence northwesterly along last said republished, as amended, this issue. A p ­ sought to operate as a common carrier, line to its intersection with Arlington plicant: STAHLY CARTAGE CO., a by motor vehicle, over regular routes, Avenue (B erk eley); thence northwest­ corporation, 130-A Hillsboro Avenue, transporting: General commodities (ex­ erly along Arlington Avenue to a point Edwardsville, 111. Applicant’s attorney: cept (1) uncrated used household goods 1 mile northeasterly of San Pablo Ave­ Mack Stephenson, 42 Fox Mill Lane, and personal effects, (2) petroleum nue (U.S. Highway 40); thence north­ Springfield, 111., 62707. Authority sought products in bulk in tank vessels, (3) live­ westerly along an imaginary line 1 mile to operate as a common carrier, by motor stock, (4) commodities of unusual value, easterly of and paralleling San Pablo vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ (5) fresh or green fruits or fresh or Avenue (U.S. Highway 40) to its inter­ ing: Acid, chemicals, fertilizer, and fer­ green vegetables from fields or point of section with County Road No. 20 (Con­ tilizer ingredients, between points in growth consigned to cold storage plants, tra Costa C ou nty); thence westerly along Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota, precooling plants, canneries, accumula­ County Road No. 20 to Broadway Avenue Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, and tion stations, packing sheds, packing­ (also known as Balboa Road); thence South Dakota. houses, or other processing facilities, and northerly along Broadway Avenue (also known as Balboa Road) to U.S. Highway No t e : The purpose of this republication (6) metal cans or can tops, bottoms or is to more Clearly set forth the proposed ends), (1) within the San Francisco- 40 ; thence northerly along U.S. Highway operation. If a hearing is deemed necessary, East Bay Cartage Zone; the San Fran­ 40 to Rivers Street; thence westerly applicant requests it be held at Chicago, III., cisco-East Bay Cartage Zone includes along Rivers Street to 11th Street, St. Louis, Mo., or at the place where other that area embraced by the following thence northerly along 11th Street to similar applications will be set for hearing. boundary: Beginning at the point where Johns Avenue; thence westerly along Johns Avenue to Collins Avenue; thence No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 58), filed the San Francisco-San Mateo County northerly along Collins Avenue to Mor­ March 1, 1965. Applicant: BEAVER boundary line meets the Pacific Ocean; ton Avenue; thence westerly along Mo - TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, 100 thence easterly along said boundary line to Lake Merced Boulevard; thence south­ ton Avenue to the Southern Pacific Co, South Calumet Street, Burlington, Wis. right of way and continuing wester y erly along said Lake Merced Boulevard Applicant’s representative: Fred H. along the prolongation of Morton Av - Figge, Post Office Box 339, Burlington, and Lynnewood Drive to South Mayfair nue to the shore line of San Pablo B y, Wis. Authority sought to operate as a Avenue; thence westerly along said thence southerly and westerly alon® .. common carrier, by motor vehicle, over South Mayfair Avenue to Crestwood Drive; thence southerly along Crestwood shore line and waterfront of San r irregular routes, transporting: (l) B ay to Point San Pablo; thence southerly Meats, meat products, and meat by prod­ Drive to Southgate Avenue; thence west­ erly along Southgate Avenue to Maddux along an imaginary line from Point , uis, as described in Section A, Appendix Pablo to the San Francisco waterfront Drive; thence southerly and easterly I, Descriptions in Motor Carrier Certifi­ at the foot of Market Street; thenc along Maddux Drive to a point 1 mile cates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, and (2) westerly along said waterfront and shor frozen foods, from points in Christian, west of U.S. Highway 101; thence south­ line to the Pacific Ocean; thence soutn Coles, Macon, and Sangamon Counties, easterly along an imaginary line 1 mile erly along the shore line of the Pacifi 111., to points in Wisconsin. west of and paralleling U.S. Highway 101 Ocean to the point of beginning, a N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, (El Camino Real) to its intersection with (a) between San Mateo and San Jose, applicant requests it be held at Springfield, the southerly boundary line of the city over U.S. Highways 101 and 101 byP - 111. Of San Mateo; thence northeasterly, serving all intermediate points, w tween Hayward and San Jose, ov No. MC 119767 (Sub-No. 59), filed northwesterly, northerly and easterly March 1, 1965. Applicant: BEAVER along said southerly boundary to Bay- fornia Highways 9 and 17, sen? ff- TRANSPORT CO., a corporation, Post shore Highway (U.S. 101 Bypass); thence intermediate points, and (c^.ser^1 i5) Office Box 339,100 South Calumet Street, leaving said boundary line and con­ route points laterally within fi

i Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3905 miles of said highways and points within Jefferson City, Mo. Authority sought to ney: Charles W . Singer, 33 North La Salle a radius of ten (10) miles of San Jose. operate as a common carrier, by motor Street, Chicago, 111., 60602. Authority vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ sought to operate as a common carrier, Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, ing: Meat, meat products, meat byprod­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, applicant requests it be held at San Fran­ ucts, dairy products, and articles dis­ transporting: Meat, meat products, and cisco, Calif. tributed by meat packinghouses, as de­ meat byproducts, dairy products, and No. MC 123332 (Sub-No. 3), filed Feb­ scribed in Sections A, B, and C of articles distributed by meat packing­ ruary 15, 1965. Applicant: C O R D E LL Appendix I to the report in Descriptions houses and such commodities as are used TRANSFER CO., INC., 128 Front Street, in M otor Carrier Certificates, 61 M.C.C. by meatpackers in the conduct of their Ketchikan, Alaska. Authority sought to 209 and 766, from Waterloo, Iowa, to business, when destined to and for use operate as a common carrier, by motor points in Missouri, and exempt commod­ by meatpackers, as described in Sections vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ ities, on return. A, B, C, and D of Appendix I to the report ing: General commodities (except ar­ Note: I f a hearing is deemed necessary, in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Cer­ ticles of unusual valu e), between points applicant requests it be held at Des Moines, tificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except in that part of Alaska south and east of Iowa. hides and commodities in bulk, in tank the international boundary line between vehicles), from Garden City, Kans., and No. MC 123393 (Sub-No. 54), filed the United States and Canada located at points within ten (10) miles thereof, to M arch 4,1965. Applicant: B IL Y E U R E ­ or near Haines, Alaska, on the one hand, points in Arizona, Illinois, California, FRIGERATED TRANSPORT CORPO­ and, on the other, Tok Junction, Alaska, Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Utah, and RATION, 1914 East Blaine Street, and Blaine and Sumas, Wash., restricted Nevada. to through traffic interlined at Tok Junc­ Springfield, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: If a hearing is deemed necessary, tion, Alaska, Blaine and Sumas, Wash., Herman W . Huber, 101 East High Street, Note: Jefferson City, Mo. Authority sought to applicant requests it be held at Washing­ with no local service or shipments orig­ ton, D.C. inating or destined to Tok Junction, operate as a common carrier, by motor Alaska, and Blaine or Sumas, W ash. vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC 123639 (Sub-No. 27), filed ing: Frozen foods, from Des Moines, Fort March 1, 1965. Applicant: J. B. M ONT­ Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Ketchikan, Dodge, and Webster City, Iowa, to points GOMERY, INC., 5150 Brighton Boule­ Alaska. in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, vard, Denver, Colo. Applicant’s attor­ South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, ney: Charles W. Singer, 33 North La No. MC 123393 (Sub-No. 51), filed Feb­ and the District of Columbia. Salle Street, Chicago, 111., 60602. Au­ ruary 25, 1965. Applicant: B IL Y E U thority sought to operate as a common REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT COR­ Note: If a hearing Is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washing­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular PORATION, 1914 East Blaine Street, ton, D.C. routes, transporting: Meat, meat prod­ Springfield, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: uets, and meat byproduets, dairy prod­ No. MC 123393 (Sub-No. 55), filed Herman W. Huber, 101 East High Street, ucts, and articles distributed by meat M arch 8,1965. Applicant: B IL Y E U R E ­ Jefferson City, Mo. Authority sought to packinghouses, and such commodities as FRIGERATED TRANSPORT CORPO­ operate as a common carrier, by motor are used by meatpackers in the conduct RATION, 1914 East Blaine Street, Vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ of their business when destined to and Springfield, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: ing: Frozen foods (except frozen meats) for use by meatpackers, as described in Herman W. Huber, 101 East High Street, from Kansas City, Kans.-M o., to points Sections A, B, C, and D of Appendix I Jefferson City, Mo. Authority sought to in Kentucky, Mississippi, Alabama, to tiie report in Descriptions in Motor operate as a common carrier, by motor Georgia, North Carolina, South Caro­ Carrier Certificates, 61 M,C.C. 209 and vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ lina, Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, 766 (except hides and commodities in and Ohio. ing: Frozen foods, from Russellville, Ark., bulk, in tank vehicles), from Dakota to points in Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, City, Nebr., to points in Arizona, Colo­ Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Kentucky, applicant requests it be held at Birmingham, rado, Illinois, California, Michigan, Ala. Tennessee, Florida, Louisiana, Arizona, Ohio, Indiana, Iowa, and Kansas. California, Colorado, Connecticut, Dela­ No. MC 123393 (Sub-No. 52), filed ware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, «arch 4, 1965. Applicant: BILYEU Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111. REFRIGERATED TRANSPORT c o r ­ Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New No. MC 123639 (Sub-No. 28), filed p o r a t io n , 1914 East Blaine Street, Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, March 1, 1965. Applicant: J. B. M ONT­ bprmgfield, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Caro­ ■Herman W. Huber, 101 East High Street, GOMERY, INC., 5150 Brighton Boule­ lina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Vir­ vard, Denver, Colo. Applicant’s attor­ nSerf°n ^ y> Mo. Authority sought to ginia, Wisconsin, and the District of ney: Charles W. Singer, 33 North La » v i as a common carrier, by motor Columbia, and exempt commodities, on Salle Street, Chicago, 111., 60602. Au­ over ^regular routes, transport- n*g. Meats, meat products, meat byprod- return. thority sought to operate as a common articles distributed by meat Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular packinghouses as described in Appendix applicant requests it be held at Washing­ routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ e rep°rt in Descriptions in Motor ton, D.C., or Little Rock, Ark. ucts, meat byproducts, and articles dis­ tributed by meat packinghouses, from Certiftcates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and No. MC 123589 (Sub-No. 1), filed rr.om Points in Dawson County, Lexington, Nebr., and points within five M arch 1,1965. Applicant: N & K C A R T ­ (5) miles thereof, and Minden, Nebr., Rhiro ’-tr Potots in Maine, N ew H am p- AGE COMPANY, a corporation, 2501 and points within five (5) miles thereof, tX.en?aon*'’ Massachusetts, Connect- Henry Street, Muskegon, Mich. Au­ to points in Arizona, California, Idaho, v a n i a m * nd> **ew York, Pennsyl- thority sought to operate as a common CnTnmiew Jersey, M aryland, District of Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular and exempt commodities, on return. WeJfmiL Pelaware, Michigan, Ohio, routes, transporting: Cement, from South o ginj?’’ Virginia, North Carolina, Buffalo, N.Y., to points in Erie, Craw­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Washington, bam? CaroUna, Georgia, Florida, Ala- ford, Warren, McKean, Potter, Mercer, J X Mississippi, Kansas, Missouri, D.C. Tioga, Bradford, Susquehanna, Wayne, commC^ ’- an<* Tennessee, and exempt Venango, Forest, Elk, Cameron, Clinton, No. MC 123993 (Sub-No. 3), filed commodities, on return. Lycoming, Sullivan, Wyoming, and March 8, 1965. Applicant: MRS. LOIS apoUcaii/L.« bearing is deemed necessary, Lackawanna Counties, Pa. M. FOGLEMAN, doing business as, F O G L E M A N T R U C K L IN E , Post Office equests it be held at Denver, Colo. If a hearing is deemed necessary, Note: Box 603, Crowley, La. Applicant’s at­ 123393 (Sub-No. 53), filed applicant requests it be held at Detroit, Mich. torney: Austin L. Hatchell, Suite 1102, REFRmir,1965* -^PPiicant: BILYEU Perry-Brooks Building, Austin 1, Tex. p SSS r a t e d t r a n s p o r t CO R - No. MC 123639 (Sub-No. 26), filed Authority sought to operate as a common March 1, 1965. Applicant: J. B. MONT­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular S ^ X V 914 East Blaine S^eet, HerniQfieH ’ Applicant’s attorney: GOMERY, INC., 5150 Brighton Boule­ routes, transporting: Sugar, in bulk naan W. Huber, 101 East High Street vard, Denver, Colo. Applicant’s attor­ (both liquid and dry), in specialized tank 3906 NOTICES or hopper vehicles, from points in Perpetual Building, Washington! D.C., Suite 703-706, McClure Building, Prank- Louisiana, to points in Alabama, Arkan­ 20004. Authority sought tb operate as a fort, Ky., 40601. Authority sought to op­ sas, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Ten­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over erate as a comrrion carrier, by motor nessee, and Texas. irregular routes, transporting: Fertilizer, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ N ote: Applicant is also authorized to con­ from Lumberton, N.C., and points within ing: Malt beverages, in bottles, cans and duct operations as contract carrier in Per­ ten (10) miles thereof, to points in South kegs, (1) from Milwaukee, Wis., Evans­ mit MC 41116 and Subs thereunder, there­ Carolina. ville, Ind., and St. Joseph, Mo., to points fore, dual operations may be involved. If N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, in Franklin County, Ky., and (2) from a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ applicant requests it be held at Wilmington, St. Joseph, Mo., and South Bend, Ind., to quests it be held at New Orleans, La. N.C. Darfork (Perry County), Ky. No. MC 124382 (Sub-No. 1), filed Jan­ No. M C 125777 (S u b -N o . 51), filed 1 N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, uary 11, 1965. Applicant: RUSSELL M arch 8,1965. Applicant: JA C K G R A Y applicant requests it be held at Lexington, HOLMES, doing business as, RUSS TRANSPORT, INC., 3200 Gibson Trans­ Ky. HOLMES TRANSPORT, Rural Route fer Road, Hammond, Ind. Applicant’s No. MC 126537 (Sub-No. 3), filed No. 1, Cardinal, Ontario, Canada. Ap­ attorney: David Axelrod, 39 South La March 5, 1965. Applicant: KENT I. plicant’s attorney: M urray J. S. K irsh- Salle Street, Chicago 3, 111. Authority TU R N E R , K E N N E T H E. TURNER AND tein, 103 Oriskany Street East, Utica 2, Sought to operate as a common carrier, E R V IN L. T U R N E R , a partnership, doing N.Y. Authority sought tb operate as a by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, business as TURNER EXPEDITING contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over transporting: Sand, in bulk, from Troy SERVICE, Post Office Box 21132, Louis­ irregular routes, transporting: Fertilizer, Grove, 111., to points in Iowa. ville, Ky. Applicant’s attorney: George fertilizer ingredients and lime, in bags; M. Catlett, Suite 703-706, McClure Bldg., in bulk; and in bags and in bulk com­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111. Frankfort, Ky., 40601. Authority sought bined, from the ports of entry on the to operate as a common carrier, by motor international boundary line between the No. MC 125777 (Sub-No. 52), filed vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ United States and Canada located at or M arch 8, 1965. Applicant : JACK GRAY ing: General commodities (except Classes near Rooseveltown and Ogdensburg, TRANSPORT, INC., 3200 Gibson Trans­ A and B explosives), between Blue Grass N.Y., to points in Albany, CayUga, fer Roadj Hammond, Ind. Applicant’s Field (Airport) located near Lexington, Chenango, Clinton, Cortland, Essex, attorney: David Axelrod, 39 South La Ky., Standiford Field (Airport) at Louis­ Franklin, Fulton, Hamilton, Herkimer, Salle Street, Chicago 3, 111. Authority ville, Ky. and the Greater Cincinnati Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Monroe, sought to operate as a common carrier, Airport near Erlanger, Ky., on the one Montgomery, Oneida, Onondaga, On­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, hand, and, on the other, points in Scott, tario, Orleans, Oswego, Otseiro, Rens­ transporting: Aluminum dross, in bulk, Harrison, Bourbon, Clark, Madison, Jes­ selaer, St. Lawrence, Saratoga, Schenec­ from points in Illinois, to points in W is­ samine, Boyle, Woodford, and Anderson tady, Schoharie, Seneca, Tompkins, consin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Counties, Ky., restricted to the handling Warren, Washington, and Wayne Coun­ and Kentucky. of shipments having an immediately ties, N.Y., and returned, refused, and N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, prior or immediately subsequent move­ rejected shipments on return. applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111. ment by air. N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, No. MC 125882 (Sub-No. 1), filed N o te:'I f a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant requests it be held at Syracuse or applicant requests it be held at Lexington, New York, N.Y. M arch 8, 1965. Applicant: WESTERN H A U LE R S, INC., 1125 W est 46th Avenue, Ky. No. MC 124777 (Sub-No. 1), filed Denver, Colo. Authority sought to oper­ No. MC 126537 (Sub-No. 4) filed March 9, 1965. Applicant: WILSON E. ate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ M arch 8, 1965. Applicant: KENT L C A N T W E L L , 14709 East 35th Street, hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: TURNER, KENNETH E. TURNER AND Independence^ Mo. Applicant’s attor­ Precast and prestressed concrete prod­ ERVIN L.. TURNER, doing business as ney: John F. Schlafly, Jr., First National ucts, which, because of size and weight TURNER EXPEDITING SERVICE, Post Bank Building, Alton, 111. f Authority require the use of special equipment, be­ Office Box 21132, Louisville, Ky. Appli­ sought to operate as a contract carrier, tween Englewood, Colo., and points in cant’s attorney: George M. Catlett, Suite by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Nebraska, Kansas, New Mexico, Utah, 703-706, McClure Bldg., Frankfort, Ky. transporting: Lime and limestone prod­ and Wyoming. Authority sought to operate as a common ucts, in bulk and in bags, from Kansas N o te: Common control may be involved. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular City, Mo., to points in that part of Kan­ I f a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant routes, transporting: General commodi­ sas on and east of U.S. Highway 83. requests it be held at Denver, Colo. ties {except Classes A and B explosives), N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, between points in Jefferson County, in •» applicant requests it be held at Kansas City, No. MC 126158 (Sub-No. 3), filed on the one hand, and, on the other, tn Mo. March 7, 1965. Applicant: OTHO Greater Cincinnati Airport located at SMITH, doing business as SMITHWAY, Erlanger, Ky., and Standiford Field (Air­ No. MC 125474 (Sub-No. 12), filed 33 Oolitic Road, Bedford, Ind. Appli­ port) , located at Louisville, Ky. March 2, 1965. Applicant: BULK cant’s attorney: David Axelrod, 33 South HAULERS, INC., a corporation, 1901 La Salle Street, Chicago, 111. Authority N o te: Applicant states the proposed serv­ Wooster Street, Wilmington, N.C. Ap­ sought to operate as a contract carrier, ice to be restricted to the handling of plicant’s attorney: John C*.Bradley, 618 ments having an immediately prior « by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, mediately subsequent movement by an- Perpetual Building, 1111 E Street NW., transporting: Corrugated steel culvert a hearing is deemed necessary, appl Washington, D.C., 20004. Authority pipe, with or without asphalt coating, and quests it be held at Lexington, Ky. sought to operate as a common carrier, fittings therefor, from the plant site of No. MC 126576 (Sub-No. f h filed by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, the Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Cor­ M arch , 1965. Applicant: DANIEL • transporting: Urea, dry, in bulk, in tank poration located at Bedford, Ind., to 8 UNDERWOOD, doing business as and hopper-type vehicles, from Wilming­ points in Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, ton, N.C., to points in North Carolina, Ohio, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and that DERWOOD BROTHERS, HO® t South Carolina, and Virginia, restricted part of Missouri, located within the St. Street, Crete, Nebr., 68333. ^ut sought to operate as a co w w o n c^ , to commodities having a prior movement Louis-East St. Louis, Commercial Zone, by motor vehicle, over i w e ^ a r route , by water on import bill of lading. as described by the Commission. transporting: Processed feed, in bui N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, bags, from Morrill, Kans., to pomts 1 applicant requests it be held at Wilmington, applicant requests it be held at Indianapolis, N.C. Ind. Adams, Buffalo, Clay, Dawson, Fillmor , Franklin, Furnas, Gage, Gosp® ’ ’ No. MC 125474 (Sub-No. 13), filed No. MC 126402 (Sub-No. 3), filed Hamilton, Harlan, Jefferson, ^ n s ° , March 2, 1965. Applicant: BULK March 9, 1965. Applicant: JACK HAULERS, INC., a- corporation, 1901 Kearney, Lancaster, Nemaha. N ’ WALKER TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., Otoe, Pawnee, Phelps, Richardson, sa Wooster Street, Wilmington, N.C. Appli­ 844 Louden Avenue, Lexington, Ky. Ap­ 1 inn QzvtfroYvi TTifl.vfir. Webster, and cant’s attorney: John C. Bradley, 618 plicant’s attorney: George M. Catlett, Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3907

Counties, Nebr„ and rejected shipments STORAGE, 400 Sheridan Drive, Sault vania, (2) from Portland, Ind., to points on return. Ste. Marie, Mich. Authority sought to in Indiana, Louisiana, Ohio, and Texas,

Note: I f a hearing is deemed necessary, operate as a contract carrier, by motor and (3) from points in Illinois, Indiana, applicant requests it be held at Omaha, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nebr. ing: Bird and animal feed, in bulk, from Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsyl­ Minneapolis, Minn., to Sault Ste. Marie, vania, and Texas, to Portland, Ind., and No. MC 126578 (Sub-No. 2), filed Mich. Springfield, Ohio. March 1,1965. Applicant: C H A R L E S E. GLAS, doing business as SE R V U S N o t e : Applicant states the above commod­ N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, TRUCKING CO., 12822 South Justine, ities will be purchased from CargiU Corp. applicant requests it be held at Columbus, by Art & Jack Young’s farm, Sault Ste. Marie, Calumet Park, 111. Applicant’s attorney: Ohio. Mich. If a hearing is deemed necessary, ap­ Charles W. Singer, 33 North La Salle plicant requests it be held at Lansing, Mich. No. M C 126990 filed February 12, 1965. Street, Chicago, HI., 60602. Authority Applicant: MURRAY T. FULLER, doing sought to operate as a contract carrier, No. MC 126933 (AMENDMENT), filed business as HORTON’S TEXACO, Lake by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, January 28, 1965, published in F ederal & Ellis, Bellingham, Wash. Authority transporting: (1) Boots and shoes, rub­ R egister, issue of February 25, 1965, sought to operate as a common carrier, ber or plastic, or plastic or rubber and amended March 10, 1965, and repub­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, canvas combined, from Rock Island, 111., lished as amended this issue. Appli­ transporting: Wrecked and disabled to Holyoke, Mass.; Stow, Toledo, Akron, cant: MERL L. HARRIS, doing business motor vehicles, (1) from Bellingham, and Columbus, Ohio; Baltimore, Md.; as HARRIS AUTO SERVICE, 1003 West Wash., to ports of entry on the interna­ New York, N.Y., and Kingston and Pitts­ Main Street, Peru, Ind. Applicant’s at­ tional boundary line between the United burgh, Pa., and (2) raw products, equip­ torney: John E. Lesow, 3737 North Me­ States and Canada located in the State ment, materials and supplies, used or ridian Street, Indianapolis 8, Ind. Au­ of Washington, and (2) between Belling­ useful in the manufacture and sale of thority sought to operate as a common ham, Wash., on the one hand, and, on boots and shoes, rubber or plastic, or carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular the other, points in the United States. plastic or rubber and canvas combined, routes, transporting: Wrecked and dis­ N o t e : If a hearing is deemed necessary, from New York, N.Y., Palmerton, Pa., abled automobiles, trucks and trailers applicant requests it be held at Bellingham, Belpre, Akron, and Ashland, Ohio, In ­ and replacement vehicles and parts Wash. stitute, W. Va., Havre de Grace, Md., therefor, by the use of wrecker equip­ Naugatuck, Conn., Holyoke, Mass., Louis­ ment only, between points in Miami, No. M C ,126997, filed February 17, 1965. ville, Ky., and Sayreville, N.J., to Rock Cass, Howard, Carroll, Grant, Wabash, Applicant: LYNN F. LYONS, doing busi­ Island, 111. and Fulton Counties, Ind., on the one ness as LYONS AIR FREIGHT, 3149 hand, and, on the other, points in Illi­ West Fourth Street, Ryan Airport, Baton Note: Applicant states the above proposed Rouge, La. Applicant’s attorney: George operations will be for the account of the nois, Michigan, Ohio, and Kentucky. S. Womack, 419 North 19th Street, Baton Servus Rubber Co. If a hearing is deemed N o t e : The purpose of this republication is Rouge, La., 70802. Authority sought to necessary, applicant requests it be held at to add the following to the commodity de­ Chicago, 111. scription “and replacement vehicles and operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ No. MC 126707 (Sub-No. 2), filed parts therefor”. If a hearing is deemed nec­ essary, applicant requests it be held at In­ ing: General commodities (except arti­ March 3, 1965. Applicant: D A N D A H L, dianapolis, Ind. cles of unusual value, Classes A and B Box 3111, Rapid City, S. Dak. Authority explosives, livestock and those contami­ sought to operate as a contract carrier, No. M C 126972, filed February 11, 1965. nating, dangerous or injurious to other by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Applicant: ROBERT C. CROWDER, do­ lading), between Baton Rouge, La., and transporting: Uranium-hearing lignite, ing business as BOB’S BODY SHOP & the New Orleans International Airport, coal and ash, between Edgemont, S. Dak., BOB’S AUTO WRECKING, 1727 Ton- Kenner, La.; (1) from Baton Rouge over and points in Slope, Billings, and Stark gass Avenue, Ketchikan, Alaska. Au­ U.S. Highway 61 to the New Orleans In­ Counties, N. Dak. thority sought to operate as a common ternational Airport, Kenner, La., and No te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular return over the same route, serving all applicant requests it be held at Pierre, S. routes, transporting: (1) Trailers and intermediate points and the off-route mobile homes designed to be drawn by point of Plaquemine, La.; (2) from Baton No MC 126707 (Sub-No. 2), file passenger vehicles, and their contents, in Rouge over U.S. Highway 61 to Prairie- S ch 8, 1965. Applicant: BRADLET! initial and secondary movements, in ville, La., thence over Louisiana Highway AIR FREIGHT, INC., 193 Tumpik truckaway service, (2) trailer undercar­ 73 to junction Louisiana Highway 74, ad, Windsor Locks, Conn. Applicant’ riages, springs, wheels, and tires which thence over Louisiana Highway 74 to St. Svvu ey: Francis E. Barrett, Jr., 18 have been used, or obtained for use on Gabriel, La., thence over Louisiana High­ Uo es Forbes Road, Braintree a prior movement of trailer or mobile way 30 to Geismar, La., thence over JJf; °2184. Authority sought t home, and (3) wrecked and disabled mo­ Louisiana Highway 30 to Darrow, La., thence over Louisiana Highway 22 to vpvJ 1i as a contract carrier, by moto tor vehicles, trailers, and mobile homes, Burnside, La., thence over Louisiana imr-rT’ 0Ver in su la r routes, transport airplanes, and boats, all requiring the nf■" (jrener®I commodities (except thos use of wrecker equipment, betwe^ Highway 44 to junction Louisiana High­ ™ »Sual value> Classes A and B ex points in southeastern Alaska south way 48, thence over Louisiana Highway tho r<6S’ household goods as defined b the Alaska-Canada international bound­ 48 to the New Orleans International Air­ ^cm m issioh, commodities in bulb ary line located generally north and port, Kenner, La., and return over the wmmodxties requiring special equipmenl west of Haines, Alaska. same route, serving all intermediate points and the off-route point of Plaque- other i ^ lnj^urious or contaminating t N o te: If a hearing is deemed necessary, mine, La.; (3) from Baton Rouge over Windsor inent by air- If a hearing i ate as a contract carrier, by motor ve­ off-route point of Plaquemine, La.; and “«o at H a S f C ra n '""“ reqUeSte “ ” hicle, over irregular routes, transport­ (4) from Baton Rouge over U.S. High­ ing: Brooms, mops, and allied items, and way 61 to Gonzales, La., thence over AWcifnt.-1 to S 9.' Tflled 28, 1965 materials, used ip their manufacture, Louisiana Highway 44 to Burnside, La., PHYLLTq -Tv/rMS L IA M D - F R O S T a n i (1) from Springfield, Ohio, to points in thence over Louisiana Highway 22 to ing busing' FRGST’ a Partnership, do Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michi­ Sorrento, La., thence over U.S. Highway bhsiness as FR O S T M O V IN G l gan, Minnesota, New York, and Pennsyl­ 61 to the New Orleans International Air- No. 57— 8 3908 NOTICES

port, Kenner, La., and return over the No. M C 127031, filed M arch 1, 1965. kota, Wyoming, and Wisconsin, and same route, serving all intermediate Applicant: ORME TRANSFER, INC., damaged and rejected shipments of the points and the off-route point of Plaque- c/o James Bradley, Post Office Box 1211, commodities specified above, on return. mine, La. Juneau, Alaska. Applicant’s attorney: Common control may be Involved. J. B. Bradley, 200 National Bank of Note: Note: Applicant states that the above de­ If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant scribed operations are to be restricted to Alaska Building, Post Office Box 1211, does not specify place of hearing. movement of goods having a prior or sub­ Juneau, Alaska. Authority sought to op­ sequent movement by air. If a hearing is erate as a common carrier, by motor ve­ No. M C 127045, filed March 3, 1965. deemed necessary, applicant requests it be hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: Applicant: C & D TRUCKING CO., a held at Baton Rouge, La. General commodities (except articles of corporation, 103 Jefferson Street, Em­ No. M C 126999, filed February 18,1965. unusual value), between points within poria, Va. Applicant’s representative: Applicant: MATTHEW BERLETCH, 25 miles of Juneau, Alaska, including George A. Olsen, 69 Tonnele Avenue, JR., 62 Laipple Street, Bridgeport, Ohio. Juneau, on the one hand, and, on the Jersey City, N.J., 07306. Authority Applicant’s representative: D. L. Ben­ other, Blaine and Sumas, Wash., and sought to operate as a contract carrier, nett, 213 First National Bank Building, Tok Junction, Alaska, with no local serv­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, 2207 National Road, Wheeling, W. Va. ice or shipments originating or destined transporting: Such commodities, ma­ Authority sought to operate as a con­ to Blaine and Sumas, Wash., or Tok terials, equipment and supplies used or tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ Junction, Alaska. sold by the foundry industry (except commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles regular routes, transporting : Carbonated Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, "beverages, in cans or bottles, and in applicant requests it be held at Juneau, and those requiring special equipment), cases, and syrup, in bottles and in cases, Alaska. between Emporia, Va., on the one hand, (1) from Morgantown, W. Va., to Cum­ and, on the other, points in Maryland, No. M C 127041, filed M arch 8, 1965, berland, Md., and (2) from Morgan­ North Carolina, Delaware, New Jersey, Applicant: ALBERT J. COOPER, JR.| town, W. Va., to Wheeling, W. Va. New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, doing business as COOPER TRUCKING and the District of Columbia. Note: Applicant states that the proposed CO., 115 Baughman Avenue, Danville, service will be under continuing contract Ky. Authority sought to operate as a Note: Applicant states that the above pro­ with Royal Crown Bottling Co., Morgantown, posed operations will be conducted under common carrier, by motor vehicle, over W. Va. If a hearing is deemed necessary, continuing contract with Emporia Foundry, applicant requests It be held at Pittsburgh, irregular routes, transporting: Used Inc. Common control may be involved. If Pa. automobiles, from Cleveland, Akron, Co­ a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ lumbus, and Cincinnati, Ohio, to Dan­ quests it be held at Washington, D.C. No. MC 127007 (Sub-No. 1), filed ville, Harrodsburg, Standford, Lexing­ No. M C 127047, filed March 8, 1965. March 3, 1965. Applicant: R. P. SAM- ton, and Louisville, Ky. POUL, doing business as COLONIAL Applicant: ED RACETTE a SON, INC., VAN & STORAGE COMPANY, 2740 Note : If a hearing is deemed necessary, ap­ 5409 North Broadway, Wichita, Kans. plicant requests it be held at Lexington, or Applicant’s attorney: John J. Jandera, South Railroad Avenue, Fresno, Calif. Frankfort, Ky. Applicant’s attorney: Marvin Handler, 641 Harrison Street, Topeka, Kans. Au­ 625 Market Street, San Francisco 5, No. M C 127042, filed M arch 8, 1965. thority sought to operate as a common Calif. Authority sought to operate as a Applicant: HAGEN, INC., 4420 Floyd carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Street, Sioux City, Iowa. Applicant’s routes, transporting: Sodium chlorate irregular routes, transporting: House­ attorney: J. Max Harding, Box 2028, 605 and monobor-chlorate, in packages and hold goods, as defined by thè Commis­ South 14th Street, Lincoln, Nebr. Au­ containers, from Columbus, Miss., to sion in 17 M.C.C. 467, between points thority sought to operate as a common points in Kansas, Nebraska, and Okla­ in Fresno, Kerri, Kings, Madera, Mari­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular homa. posa, Merced, Stanislaus, Tulare, and routes, transporting: Meats, meat prod­ Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, Tuolumne Counties, Calif. ucts, and meat byproducts, and articles applicant requests it be held at Wichita, Note: If a hearing is deemed necessary, distributed by meat packinghouses, as Kans. applicant requests it be held at San Fran­ described in Sections A, B, and C, and No. M C 127048, filed March 4, 1965. cisco, Calif. D of Appendix I to the Report in D e­ Applicant: CLARWALT CORPORA­ No. MC 127023 (Sub-No. 1), filed scriptions in Motor Carrier Certificates, TIO N , Post Office Box 163, Rural Deliv­ March 1, 1965. Applicant: R. M. E. 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except hides and ery, Califon, N.J. Applicant’s attorney: TRANSPORT, INC., Post Office Box 418, commodities in bulk, in tank vehicles), Charles J. Willimas, 1060 Broad Street, Streator, 111. Applicant’s attorney: R ob­ from Garden City, Kans., and points Newark, N.J. Authority sought to oper­ ert H- Levy, 105 West Adams Street, within ten (10) miles thereof, to points ate as a contract carrier, by motor ve­ Chicago, 111., 60603. Authority sought in Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, hicle, over irregular routes, transporting: to operate as a common carrier, by mo­ Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Fuel oil, in bulk, in tank vehicles, from tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans­ Wisconsin, and Wyoming, and damaged Port Newark, Linden, Sewaren, and Perth porting: (1) Glassware, glass bottles and and rejected shipments of the commodi­ Amboy, N.J., to Stroudsburg, East jars; caps for bottles or jars, and cartons, ties specified above, on return. Stroudsburg, and New Hope, Pa., ana from the site of the plants and ware­ Note: Common control may be involved. to points in Northampton County, Pa- houses of Anchor Hocking Glass Corp., I f a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant N ote: Applicant states the service as pro­ located at or near Gurnee, HI., to points requests it be held at Wichita, Kans. posed above to ~be restricted to service per in Kénosha, Racine, Walworth, Rock, No. MC 127042 (Sub-No. 1), filed formed under a continuing contract or co - tracts with Leigh Fuel Corp. If a Rearing Green, Dane, Jefferson, Waukesha, Mil­ March 8, 1965. Applicant: HAGEN, waukee, Ozaukee, Washington, Dodge, is deemed necessary, applicant requests INC., 4420 Floyd Street, Sioux City, held at Newark, N J. and Columbia Counties, Wis., and Lake, Iowa. Applicant’s attorney: J. Max La Porte, Porter, and St. Joseph Coun­ Harding, Box 2028, Lincoln, Nebr. Au­ to. M C 127049, filed M archJ, I n ­ ties, Ind., and St. Louis Courity, Mo.; thority sought to operate as a common dicant: CEDARBURG CONTAINER and (2) empty pallets and rejected and carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular RRIERS C O RPO RATIO N, 131 Norm returned shipments of the above com­ routes, transporting: Meat, meat prod­ nklin, Port Washington, Wis. Appu- modities from points in Kenosha, Racine, t’s attorney: Frank M. Coyne BanK ucts and meat byproducts, dairy prod­ Walworth, Rock, Green, Dane, Jefferson, ucts, and articles distributed by meat Madison, 1 West M ain Street, Mam Waukesha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Wash­ packinghouses, as described in Sections , Wis. Authority sought to operate ington, Dodge, and Columbia Counties, A, B, and C of Appendix I to the Report mtract carrier, by motor vehicle, Wis., and Lake, La Porte, Porter, and in Descriptions in Motor Carrier Cer­ gular routes, transporting: M __ St. Joseph Counties, Ind., and St. Louis er containers, from Cedarburg, ^ tificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766 (except County, Mo., to the site of the plants and hides and commodities in bulk, in tank points in the United States C warehouses of Anchor Hocking Glass vehicles), from points in Dakota County, its in Alaska and Hawaii), and Corp., located at or near Gurnee, HI. Nebr., to points in Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, er, on return. Note : If a hearing is deemed necessary, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebras­ — .. inniim nt States the proposed service applicant requests it be held at Chicago, 111. ka, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Da­ Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3909 ttnuing contracts with Formart Containers, New York Highway 173 to junction New Highway 81 at Cortland, N.Y., over New Inc., Cedarburg, Wis. If a rearing is deemed York Highway 31, thence over New York York Highway 13, serving all interme­ necessary, applicant requests it be held at Highway 31 to Niagara Falls and return diate points; (28) between Avon, N.Y., Madison, Wis. -if.. f , over the same route, serving all inter­ and Geneva, N.Y.; from Avon over New No MC 127057, filed M arch 12, 1965. mediate points; (11) between Rochester, York Highway 39 to junction New York Applicant: M OTOR R A IL T R A N S P O R T , N.Y., and Owego, N.Y., over New York Highway 63 at Geneseo, N.Y., thence INC., 1 East Bridge Street, Oswego, N.Y. Highway 96, serving all intermediate over New York Highway 63 to junction Authority sought to operate as a common points; (12) between Canaiidaigua, N.Y., New York Highway 408, thence over New carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular and junction New York Highway 21 and York Highway 408 to junction New York routes, transporting: General commodi­ U.S. Highway 104 at Williamson, N.Y., Highway 36 at Mount Morris, N.Y., ties (except those of unusual value, over New York Highway 21, serving all thence over New York Highway 36 to Classes A and B explosives, household intermediate points; (13) between Bing­ junction New York Highway 245 at goods as defined by the Commission, hamton, N.Y., and junction U.S. High­ Dansville, N.Y., thence over New York commodities in bulk and commodities way 11 and Interstate Highway 87, over Highway 245 to Geneva and return over requiring special equipment), (1) be­ U.S. Highway 11, serving all intermediate the same route, serving all intermediate tween points in the New York, N.Y., points; (14) between Binghamton, N.Y., points; (29) between Albany, N.Y., and Commercial Zone, and the New York- and Malone, N.Y.; from Binghamton the international boundary line between Pennsylvania State line near Ripley, over New York Highway 12 to junction the United States and Canada, over In­ N.Y.; from points in the New York, N.Y., New York Highway 26 at Alexandria terstate Highway 87, serving all inter­ Commercial Zone, over U.S. Highway 9 Bay, N.Y., thence over New York High­ mediate points; (30) between Albany, to junction New York Highway 5 at way 26 to junction New York Highway N.Y., and the New York-Massachusetts Albany, N.Y., thenoe over New York 37, thence over New York Highway 37 State line, over Interstate Highway 90, Highway 5 to the New York-Pennsylvania to Malone and return over the same serving all intermediate points; (31) State line near Ripley and return over route, serving all intermediate points; between Albany, N.Y., and Rouses Point, the same route, serving all intermediate (15) between Binghamton, N.Y., and the N.Y., ovej U.S. Highway 9, serving all points; (2) between New York, N.Y., and international boundary line between the intermediate points; (32) between Bath, junction New York Highway 17 and U.S. United States and Canada near Alex­ N.Y., and junction New York Highways Highway 20 at Westfield, N .Y.; from New andria Bay, N.Y., over Interstate High­ 54 and 14 at Dresden, N.Y., over New York over U.S. Highway 9 to Tarrytown, way 81, serving all intermediate points; York Highway 54, serving all intermedi­ N.Y., thence across the Hudson River (16) between Buffalo, N.Y., and Niagara ate points; (33) between Hammonds- Bridge to Nyack, N.Y., thence over New Falls, N.Y., over New York Highway 384, port, N.Y., and junction New York York Highway 59 to junction New York serving all intermediate points; (17) be­ Highways 54A and 54 at Penn Yan, N.Y., Highway 17 at Hillbum, N.Y., thence tween Buffalo, N.Y., and junction New over New York Highway 54A, serving all over New York Highway 17 to junction York Highways 16 and 17 at Olean, N.Y., intermediate points; (34) between Mex­ Ü.S. Highway 20 at Westfield and return over New York Highway 16, serving all ico, N.Y., and junction New York H igh­ over the same route, serving all inter­ intermediate points; (18) between Rome, way 3 and U.S. Highway 9 at Plattsburgh, mediate points; (3) between New York, N.Y., and the international boundary line N.Y., over New York Highway 3, serving N.Y., and the New York-Pennsylvania between the United States and Canada all intermediate points; (35) between State line; from New York over Inter­ located at or near Niagara Falls, N.Y.; Saranac Lake, N.Y., and junction New state Highway 87 to junction Interstate from Rome over New York Highway 69 York Highway 73 and U.S. Highway a, Highway 90 near Albany, N.Y., thence to junction U.S. Highway 104 at Mexico, over New York Highway 73, serving all over Interstate Highway 90 to the New N.Y., thence over U.S. Highway 104 to intermediate points; (36) between Sara­ York-Pennsylvania State line and re­ the international boundary line between toga Springs, N.Y., and junction New turn over the same route, serving all the United States and Canada located York Highways 67 and 5 at Amsterdam, intermediate points ; (4) between Nyack, at or near Niagara Falls and return N.Y.; from Saratoga Springs over New N.Y., and Albany, N.Y., over U.S. High­ over the same route, serving all inter­ York Highway 50 to junction New York way 9W, serving all intermediate points ; mediate points; (19) between Rome, Highway 67 at Ballston Spa, N.Y., thence (5) between Peekskill, N.Y., and junction N.Y., and junction New York Highways over New York Highway 67 to junction New York Highway 9D and U.S. H igh­ 26 and 3 at Carthage, N.Y., over New New York Highway 5 at Amsterdam and way 9 at Wappinger Falls, N.Y., over New York Highway 26, serving all interme­ return over the same route, serving all York Highway 9D, serving all intermedi­ diate points; (20) between Troy, N.Y., intermediate points; and (37) between ate points; (6) between Albany, N.Y., and junction New York Highways 7 and Catskill, N.Y., and junction New York and the New York-Pennsylvania State 17 at Binghamton, N.Y., over New York Highways 162 and 5S at Sprakers, N.Y.; line near Ripley, N.Y., over U.S. Highway Highway 7, serving all intermediate from Catskill over New York Highway 20, serving all intermediate points; (7) points; (21) between Geneva, N.Y., and 145 to junction New York Highway 30 between Schenectady, N.Y., and junction junction New York Highways 14 and 17 at Middleburg, N.Y., thence over New New York Highways 46 and 5; from near Horseheads, N.Y., over New York York Highway 30 to junction New York Schenectady over New York Highway 5S Highway 14, serving all intermediate Highway 7, thence over New York High­ to junction New York Highway 69 and points; (22) between Niagara Falls, way 7 to junction New York Highway 30A btica, N.Y., thence over New York H igh - N.Y., and junction U.S. Highway 62 and (formerly New York Highway 148) at Central Bridge, N.Y., thence over New Junction New York Highway New York Highway 17 near Kennedy, o5 at Rome, N.Y., thence over New York N.Y., over U.S. Highway 62, serving all York Highway 30A (formerly New York Highway 365 to junction New York H igh - intermediate points; (23) between Ham­ Highway 148) to junction New York ay 46 at Oneida, N.Y., thence over New burg, N.Y.V and junction U.S. Highway Highway 162 at Sloansville, N.Y., thence over New York Highway 162 to junction T,?r£ Highway 46 to junction New York 219 and New York Highway 17 at Sala­ ighway 5 and return over the same manca, N.Y., over U.S. Highway 219, New York Highway 5S at Sprakers and ute, serving all intermediate points; serving all intermediate points; (24) return over the same route, serving all w between Syracuse, N.Y., and junction between Rochester, N.Y., and Buffalo, intermediate points. In connection with all of the above de­ ¿ork Highway 57 and U.S. Highway N.Y., over New York Highway 33, serving scribed routes, (1) through (37) inclu­ tt; , - Oswego, N.Y., over New York all intermediate points; (25) between sive, applicant proposes to serve the fol­ PointWay 57, serving a11 intermediate Rochester, N.Y., and junction U.S. High­ way 15 and New York Highway 17 at lowing off-route points: (1) points in Al­ Between Syracuse, N.Y., and i Painted Post, N.Y., over U.S. Highway bany, Broome, Erie, Monroe, Nassau, Oneida, Onondaga, Suffolk, and West­ NeW York Highway 370 and 15, serving all intermediate points; chester Counties, N.Y., (2) all ports of NP?v ay,104 at Red Creek, N.Y., (26) Between Dansville, N.Y., and entry located on the international term3°*? Highway 370, serving al junction New York Highways 36 and 17 Points; (10) between S at Jasper, N.Y., over New York High­ boundary line between the United States and Canada located at or near Alexan­ SvS N-Y’’ and Niagara Falls, N.Y.; way 36, serving all intermediate points; dria Bay, Buffalo, Lewiston, Massena, the over unnumbered highwa (27) between Elmira, N.Y., and junction lage of Solvay, N.Y., thence New York Highway 13 and Interstate Niagara Falls, Ogdensburg, Rouses Point, 3910 NOTICES

and Trout River, N.Y., and (3) Arcade, the same route, serving no intermediate tween Tacoma, Wash., and Spokane Attica, Barker, Brownville, Canastota, points. W ash., between Seattle, Wash., and Castorland, Cuba, Dannemora, Dexter, N ote: Common control may be involved. Wenatchee, Wash., and between Seattle Edmeston, Freeville, Gloversville, Gro­ I f a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant and Tacoma, Wash., Missoula, Mont., ton, Hamilton, Heuvelton, Hudson Palls, requests it be held at Washington, D.C. and Coulee Dam, Wash. Johnstown, Lyndonville, Merchanics- N ote: Common control may be involved. ville, Millerton, Montezuma, Model City, No. MC 96007 (Sub-No. 21), filed Feb­ New Berlin, North Rose, Norfolk, Nor­ ruary 26, 1965. Applicant: KENNETH No. M C 1658 (Sub-No. 47), filed March wood, Nunda, Oakfield, Perry, Rensse­ HUDSON, INC., doing business as HUD­ I , 1965. Applicant: NORWALK TRUCK SON BUS LINES, 7p Union Street, Med­ laer, Sodus Center, Sterling, Ticonderoga, LINES INC. OF DELAWARE, Manheim Wassaic, Willard, and Youngstown, N.Y. ford, Mass. Authority sought to operate Pike, Lancaster, Pa. Applicant’s rep­ as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, resentative: Marion M. Emery, 6055 N ote: If a hearing is deemed necessary, over irregular routes, transporting: Pas­ applicant requests it be held at Syracuse, N.Y. Flanders Road, Sylvania, Ohio. Au­ sengers and their baggage, in special op­ thority sought to operate as a common M otor C arriers o f P assengers erations, beginning and ending at points carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular in Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, Middlesex, routes, transporting: General commodi­ No. MC 1515 (Sub-No. 78), filed Febru­ and Essex Counties, Mass., and Hillsboro ary 24, 1965. Applicant: GREYHOUND ties (except those of unusual value, County, N.H., and extending to points Classes A and B explosives, household LINES, INC., 140 South Dearborn Street, in the continental United States. Chicago, 111., 60603. Applicant’s attor­ goods as defined by the Commission and ney: Barrett Elkins, 1400 West Third Note: The proposed operations described commodities in bulk and commodities above will consist of round trip conducted, requiring special equipment), between Street, Cleveland, Ohio, 44113. Author­ sightseeing and pleasure tours on which the ity sought to operate as a common car­ W est Nanticoke, Pa., and junction U.S. passengers maintain their identities as mem­ Highways 11 and 15, over U.S. Highway rier, by motor vehicle, over regular bers of a group-, and in respect of which the II, serving all intermediate points. routes, transporting: Passengers and individual tickets sold include in the price their baggage, and express and newspa­ thereof a charge for some significant service N ote: This application is filed pursuant pers, in the same vehicle with passengers, rendered by the carrier other than transpor­ to MC-C-4366, effective May 1, 1964, which provides the special rules for conversion of (1) between junction Pennsylvania tation. Common control may be involved. I f a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant irregular to regular motor carrier operations. Highway 83 (Business Loop) and Inter­ requests it be held at Boston, Mass. \ Special Note: Protests to this application state Highway 83 (approximately 1 mile may be filed within 45 days instead of 30 north of North York, Pa.) and Baltimore, No. MC 127027 (Sub-No. 1), filed days. Md., over Interstate Highway 83, serving March 2, 1965. Applicant: LANCELOT No. M C 2754 (Sub-No. 14), filed Feb­ all intermediate points,* (2) between E. ZIMMER, doing business as ZIM­ ruary 26, 1965. Applicant: NEUEN­ Shrewsbury, Pa., and junction Pennsyl­ MER’S TRANSPORTATION, 34 East DORF TRANSPORTATION CO., a cor­ vania Highway 851 and Interstate High­ Gore Street, Stratford, Ontario, Canada. poration, 121 South Stoughton Road, way 83, over Pennsylvania Highway 851, Applicant’s attorney : S. Harrison Kahn, Madison, Wis. Applicant’s attorney: Ed­ serving no intermediate points; (3) be­ 733 Investment Building, Washington, ward Solie, Executive Building, Suite 100, tween junction Maryland Highways 45 D.C. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over 4513 Vernon Boulevard, Madison 5, Wis. and 145 (approximately 1 mile north of Authority sought to operate as a common Cockeysville, Md.) and junction Mary­ irregular routes, transporting: Passen­ gers and their baggage, in round trip carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular land Highway 145 and Interstate High­ routes, transporting: General commodi­ way 83, over Maryland Highway 145, special and chartered operations, begin­ ning and ending at ports of entry on the ties (except those of unusual value, serving no intermediate points; and (4) Classes A and B explosives, household between junction Maryland Highway 45 international boundary line between the United States and Canada, and extend­ goods as defined by the Commission, and Interstate Highway 695 (at Inter­ commodities in bulk, and those requiring change No. 26 of Interstate Highway ing to all points in the United States (ex­ cept Alaska and Hawaii). special equipment) (1) Between Pren­ 695) north of Baltimore, Md., and junc­ tice, Wis», and junction Wisconsin High­ tion Interstate Highway 695 and Mary­ Note: The proposed transportation serv­ way 111 and Wisconsin Highway 13, over land Highway 3 (at Interchange No. 7 ice shall be restricted to foreign commerce Wisconsin Highway 13, serving all inter­ of Interstate Highway 695) south of Bal­ only. If a hearing is deemed necessary, ap­ plicant requests it be held at Buffalo, N.Y. mediate points and the off-route point oi timore, Md., over Interstate Highway 695 the plant of Cranberry Lake Develop­ in a westwardly and southwardly direc­ A pplications i n W h ic h H a n d l in g W i t h ­ ment Company on unnamed town road tion, serving all intermediate points. o u t H e a r in g H as B e e n R equested two (2) miles east of junction Wisconsin N ote: Common control may be involved. MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY Highway 13 and U.S. Highway 111- ^ If a hearing is deemed necessary, applicant Between junction U.S. Highway 8 ana requests it be held at Baltimore, Md. No. MC 730 (Sub-No. 244), filed Feb­ Wisconsin Highway 11 l_..and junchob ruary 17, 1965. Applicant: PACIFIC Wisconsin Highway 111 and Wisconsin No. MC 59238 (Sub-No. 59), filed INTERMOUNTAIN EXPRESS CO., a Highway 13, over Wisconsin Highway March 1, 1965. Applicant: VIRGINIA corporation, 1417 Clay Street, Oakland, III, serving all intermediate p c ® ^ STAGE LINES, INCORPORATED, 114 Calif. Applicant’s representative: Al­ Between Ingram, Wis., and Tripoli, w •> Fourth Street SE., Charlottesville, Va. fred G. Krebs (same address as appli­ over U.S. Highway 8, serving all inter­ Applicant’s attorney: James E. Wilson, cant) . Authority sought to operate as mediate points and the off-route points 1111 E Street NW., Washington 4, D.C. a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over of Kennan, Brantwood, ® d Cl®“ ; Authority sought to operate as a regular routes, transporting: General Wis. (4) Between Ingram, Wis. ana common carrier, by motor vehicle, over commodities (except livestock and Greenwood, Wis., over Wisconsin H- g regular routes, transporting: Passengers household goods as defined by the Com­ way 73, serving all intermediate points and their baggage, and express and mission), between junction U.S. Highway and the off-route point of Lu,bl.m’ T;nn newspapers, in the same vehicle with 10 (Interstate Highway 90) and Wash­ (5) Between Sheldon, Wis., and junctio passengers, between junction Interstate ington Highway 18 near North Bend, Wisconsin Highway 194 and Wiscons Highway 66 and Interstate Highway 495 Wash., and junction U.S. Highway 99 Highway 73, over Wisconsin Highway and Silver Spring, Md.; from junction (Interstate Highway 5) and Washington 194, serving all intermediate points. Highway 18 near Tacoma, Wash., over Between junction U.S. Highway 8 Interstate Highway 66 and Interstate Washington Highway 18, serving no in­ Wisconsin Highway 86 and Highway 495 over Interstate Highway 495 termediate points and serving the ter­ Wisconsin Highway 86 and Lm to junction Maryland Highway 97, thence mini for purposes of joinder only, as an County O, over Wisconsin Highway *». over Maryland Highway 97 to junction alternate route for operating convenience serving all intermediate points. ' U.S. Highway 29, thence over U.S. High­ only in connection with applicant’s au­ Between junction U.S. Highway i t ----VV and lunction Liu* way 29 to Silver Spring and return over thorized regular-route operations be­ Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3911

coin County Y Y and Wisconsin Highway its presently authorized regular route opera­ equipment, and those injurious or con­ 86, over Lincoln County Y Y , serving all tions of general commodities, with excep­ taminating to other lading), (1) between intermediate points. (8) Between Spirit, tions. This application is filed pursuant to MC—C—4366, effective May 1, 1964, which pro­ Baltimore, Md., and New York, N.Y.; (a) Wis., and junction Wisconsin Highway vides the special rules for conversion of ir­ from Baltimore over U.S. Highway 40 to 102 and Wisconsin Highway 13, over W is­ regular route to regular motor carrier opera­ junction Maryland Highway 7, near consin Highway 102, serving all inter­ tions. Havre deGrace, Md., thence over Mary­ mediate points. (9) Between Medford, Special N ote : Protests to this application land Highway 7 to Elkton, Md., thence Wis., and junction Wisconsin Highway may be filed within 45 days instead of 30 days. over U.S. Highway 40 via State Road, 64 and Chippewa County D, over W is­ No. MC 3149 (Sub-No. 5), filed March Del., to junction U.S. Highway 130, consin Highway 64, serving all inter­ 8, 1965. Applicant: TRANSPORTA­ thence over U.S. Highway 130 to junction mediate points. (10) Between W ausau, TION CORPORATION OF INDIANA, U.S. Highway 1, and thence over U.S. Wis., and junction U.S. Highway 51 and 2449-51 Gilbert Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio. Highway 1 to New York, (b) from Balti­ Lincoln County H south of Irm a, Wis., Applicant’s attorney: Clarence D. Todd, more over the above-specified route to over U.S. Highway 51, serving all inter­ 1825 Jefferson Place NW., Washington, State Road, Del., thence over U.S. High­ mediate points and the off-route point D.C. Authority sought to operate as a way 13 via Chester, Pa., to junction U.S. of Brokaw, Wis. (11) Between Wausau, contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over Highway 1, and thence over U.S. High­ Wis., and junction Wisconsin Highway 29 irregular routes, transporting: Such way 1 to New York, (c) from Baltimore to and Chippewa County G east of Boyd, merchandise, as is dealt in by mail order Chester as specified above, thence across Wis., over Wisconsin Highway 29, serv­ houses and their stores, from Fort the Delaware River to Bridgeport, N.J., ing all intermediate points and the off- Wayne, Ind., to points in St. Joseph, thence over U.S. Highway 130 to junction route points of Withee, Curtiss, Dor­ Branch, Hillsdale, Lenawee, and Monroe U.S. Highway 1, and thence over U.S. chester, Riplinger, Fenwood, Edgar, and Counties, Mich., under a continuing con­ Highway 1 to New York, and (d) from Marathon City, Wis. tract with Sears Roebuck & Co. Baltimore over U.S. Highway 1 to New (12) Between junction U.S. Highway No. MC ,20207 (Sub-No. 37), filed York, and return over the same routes, 51 and Wisconsin Highway 153 and junc­ March 1, 1965. Applicant: CONTINEN­ serving the intermediate points on U.S. tion of Wisconsin Highway 153 and W is­ TAL TRANSPORTATION LINES, INC., Highway 1 between Baltimore, Md. and consin Highway 13, over Wisconsin H igh­ Continental Square, Graham Street, junction U.S. Highway 1 and U.S. High­ way 153, serving all intermediate points McKees Rocks, Pa. Applicant’s at­ way 222, the intermediate points on U.S. and the off-route point of Rozellville, Highway 222 between its junction with Wis. (13) Between junction Wisconsin torney: John A. Vuono, 1515 Park Build­ ing, Pittsburgh, Pa. Authority sought U.S. Highway 1 and U.S. Highway 40, the Highway 107 and Wisconsin Highway 64 intermediate points on U.S. Highway 40 and junction of Wisconsin Highway 107 to operate as a common carrier,lay motor vehicle, over regular routes, transporting (also Maryland Highway 7) between and Wisconsin Highway 153, over W is­ Baltimore, Md., and junction U.S. High­ consin Highway 107, serving all inter­ General commodities (except those of unusual value, Classes A and B explo­ way 40 and U.S. Highway 222, and the mediate points and the off-route point of off-route points of Edgewood Arsenal Hamburg, Wis. (14) Between Longwood, sives, household goods as defined by the Commission, commodities in bulk, and and Aberdeen Proving Grounds,’ and Wis, and junction Marathon County N points in Maryland within twenty-five and Wisconsin Highway 107, over Clark those requiring special equipment), be­ tween Pittsburgh and Scranton, Pa., miles of Baltimore, Md., the intermedi­ County N and Marathon County N, Serv- ate points on U.S. Highway 1 between form Pittsburgh over U.S. Highway 22 to p * all intermediate points. (15) B e­ New Brunswick, N.J. (including New its junction with U.S. Highway 522, lo­ tween Merrill, Wis. and junction W is­ Brunswick) and New York, N.Y. (ex­ cated at Mount Union, Pa., thence over consin Highway 107 and Lincoln County cepting intermediate points on U.S. . over Wisconsin Highway 107, serving U.S. Highways 22 and 522 to Lewistown, Pa., thence over U.S. Highway 522 to its Highway 1 between Rahway, N.J., in­ iim^«^er« e^ a^e P°ints. (16) Between cluding Rahway) and New York, N.Y., junction with U.S. Highway 11, located junction Wisconsin Highway 64 and L in - and off-route points in Nassau County, at or near Selingsgrove, Pa., thence over £ C?unty M west of Merrill, Wis., and N.Y., those in Bergen, Passaic, Hudson, U.S. Highway 11 to Scranton, and return anHT ,Wls > over Lincoln County M Essex, Union, Morris, and that portion over the same route, and (b) from Pitts­ mpsi!?ylor.County M > serving all inter- of Middlesex County north of the Rari­ burgh over the Pennsylvania Turnpike Maratw01!?8' (17) Between junction tan River, except Paterson, Passaic, and to Harrisburg, Pa., thence over U.S. Hi?hn7o°nnrTCoun^y A and Wisconsin Irvington, and the off-route point of Highway 11 to Scranton, and return over S E T ¡1 north of Athens> Wis., and the same route. Bound Brook, N.J. and (2) Between E * Marathon County A and U.S. Baltimore, Md., and Washington, D.C. ?,l', oyer Marathon County A, N o t e : Applicant states in the service as (a) from Baltimore over U.S. Highway 1 BetwSn *2 , “ Jtermediate points. (18) proposed above “service is authorized to and to Washington, and (b) from Baltimore from intermediate and off-route points in Tavlor ~ Westboro, Wis. and junction oyer U.S. Highway 40 to junction U.S. Pennsylvania within thirty-five (35) miles of 73 esS n f^ ty D and Wisconsin Highway Pittsburgh, and within thirty-five (35) miles Highway 29, thence over U.S. Highway C o S “mp ^iver> W is> over Taylor of Scranton.” This application is filed pur­ 29 to Washington, and return over the Points m m ier7ing aU intermediate suant to MC—C—4366, effective May 1, 1964, same routes, serving all intermediate sin ^ Between junction Wiscon- which provides the special rules for con­ points, and points within five (5) miles a n d S i^ ^ 7 and ****** County J version of irregular route to regular route of said routes, and those in Maryland Us E £ Wisconsin Highway 107 and motor carrier operations. within fifteen miles of Washington, D.C., way 5 5A* over Wisconsin High- Special N o t e : Protests to this application as off-route points. in/conv^f alternate route for operat- may be filed within 45 days instead of 30 days. mediate °? ly> serving no inter- N o t e : Applicant states it is to be recog­ nized that the existing regular route author­ of Wiscom/ifw- a? d serving the junction No. MC 52810 (Sub-No. 13), filed ity between Baltimore, Md., and New York, wav Highway 107 and U.S. High- March 1, 1965. Applicant: BALTI­ N.Y., and the intermediate points of Rahway, BetVinTunrtf °Ser ?f joinder °nly. <20) MORE-NEW YORK EXPRESS, IN­ N.J., and the intermediate points between U.s. fflghwivfci?n Ll“ Coln County H and CORPORATED, 1100 North Macon Rahway, N.J., and New York, N.Y.; off-route Tripoli w ir 51/ outh of Irm a, Wis., and Street, Baltimore, Md., 21203. Appli-N points of Paterson, Passaic, and Irvington, N.J., as well as the present operating author­ County h and l unction Lincoln cant’s attorney: W illiam J. Little, 1513 ity from Baltimore to Washington, D.C., Highway 5l tnU 'S' i?lghway 51 over U.S. Fidelity Building, Baltimore, Md;, 21201. Way 9i y+hLt0 sanction Wisconsin High- restricted to traffic moving from New York, Authority sought to operate as a common N.Y., is not restricted as to commodities 91 toctta TTcf Highway carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular which can be transported, and that general over U s TTicrv, Highway 8, thence routes, transporting: General commodi­ commodities without restrictions are au­ turn over t h ? ^ y 8 to T riPoli. and re­ ties (except those of unusual value, and thorized. By the filing of this application, route fort onprir r° Ute' as an alternate except Classes A and B explosives, house­ applicant does not propose that restrictions serving no convenience only, hold goods as defined in Practices of be imposed as to this existing unrestricted NorT mtermediate points. general commodity description. The ad­ Motor Common Carriers of Household ditional regular route authority following 0PerationsPfrivia?t states the above proposed Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467, commodities in conversion is proposed to be restricted as now win be combined and tacked to bulk, commodities requiring special applicable to existing irregular route author- 3912 NOTICES

Ity. As required by the rules, applicant is to junction Georgia Highway 74, thence U.S. Highway 27 to junction unnum­ willing to surrender that portion of its irreg­ over Georgia Highway 74 to junction bered Georgia Highway at Blakely, Ga„ ular route authority found to have evolved U.S. Highway 80, thence over U.S. High­ thence over unnumbered Georgia High­ into a regular route service, retaining, how­ way 80 to Savannah. ever, the right to conduct irregular route way to Cedar Springs, and return over operations over existing gateways or tacking (c) From La Grange over Georgia the same route, serving all intermediate points, and also the right to tack regular Highway 109 to junction Georgia High­ points, (11) between La Grange and Al­ route authority with irregular route author­ way 18, thence over Georgia Highway bany, Ga.; from La Grange, Ga., over ity in the conduct of its future operations. 18 to junction Georgia Highway 74, Georgia Highway 109 to junction U.S. This application is filed pursuant to MO-C- thence over Georgia Highway 74 to junc­ Highway (Alternate) 27, thence over 4366, effective May 1, 1964, which provides the tion U.S. Highway 80, thence over U.S. U.S. Highway (Alternate) 27 to junction special rules for conversion of irregular Highway 80 to junction Georgia Highway Georgia Highway 85, thence over Georgia route to regular motor carriers operations. 29, thence over Georgia Highway 29 to Special N ote: Protests to this application Highway 85 to junction Georgia High­ may be filed within 45 days Instead of 30 junction Georgia Highway 46, thence way 41, thence oyer Georgia Highway days. over Georgia Highway 46 to junction 41 to junction Georgia Highway 90, U.S. Highway 80, thence over U.S. High­ thence over Georgia Highway 90 to junc­ No. MC 58923 (Sub-No. 32), filed Feb­ way 80 to Savannah, and (d) from La tion U.S. Highway 19, thence over U.S. ruary 23, 1965. Applicant: GEORGIA Grange over Georgia Highway 109 to Highway 19 to Albany (also over Georgia HIGHW AY EXPRESS, INC., 2090 Jones­ junction Georgia Highway 18, thence Highway 62 to Blakely, Ga., thence over boro Road SE., Atlanta, Ga. Applicant’s over Georgia Highway 18 to junction unnumbered Georgia Highway to Cedar attorney: Robert C. Dryden (same ad­ Georgia Highway 74, thence over Georgia Springs, Ga., and return) (thence over dress as applicant). Authority sought Highway 74 to junction U.S. Highway U.S. Highway 82 to Dawson, Ga., thence to operate as a common carrier, by motor 80, thence over U.S. Highway 80 to junc­ over Georgia Highway 118 to Bronwood, vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ tion Georgia Highway 29, thence over Ga., and return) and (thence over U.S. ing: I General commodities (except Georgia Highway 29 to junction U.S. Highway 19 to Meigs, Ga., and return those of unusual value, Classes A and B Highway 280, thence over U.S. Highway over U.S. Highway 19 to Camilla, Ga., explosives, household goods as defined 280 to junction Georgia Highway 292, thence over Georgia Highway 37 to New­ by the Commission, commodities in bulk, thence over Georgia Highway 292 to ton, Ga., thence over Georgia Highway commodities requiring special equip­ junction U.S. Highway 280, thence over 91 to A lb a n y ), and return over the same ment, and those injurious or contami­ U.S. Highway 280 to junction U.S. High­ route, serving all intermediate points, nating to other lading), (1) between way 80, thence over U.S. Highway 80 to (12) between La Grange and Americus, La Grange and Rossville, Ga., over U.S. Savannah, and return over the same G a.; (a ) from La Grange over Georgia Highway 27, (2) between La Grange and routes, serving all intermediate points in Highway 109 to junction U.S. Highway Ringgold, Ga.; from La Grange over U.S. (1) through (5) above, (6) between La (Alternate) 27, thence over U.S. High­ Highway 27 to junction Georgia High­ Grange and Tennga, Ga; (a) from La way (Alternate) 27 to junction Georgia way 53, thence over Georgia Highway 53 Grange over U.S. Highway 27 to junction Highway 85, thence over Georgia High­ to junction U.S. Highway 41, thence over Georgia Highway 61, thence over way 85 to junction Georgia Highway 41, U.S. Highway 41 to Ringgold, and re­ Georgia Highway 61 to junction U.S. thence over Georgia Highway 41 to junc­ turn over the same route, (3) between Highway 411, thence over U.S. Highway tion Georgia Highway 90, thence over La Grange and Calhoun, Ga.; (a) from 411 to Tennga, and return over the same Georgia Highway 90 to junction U.S. La Grange over U.S. Highway 29 to junc­ route, serving all intermediate points, Highway 19, thence over U.S. Highway tion U.S. Highway 41, thence over U.S. (7) between La Grange and Dalton, Ga.; 19 to Americus, (b) from La Grange over Highway 41 to Calhoun, and (b) from from La Grange over U.S. Highway 27 to U.S. Highway 29 to junction U.S. High­ La Grange over U.S. Highway 27 to junc­ junction^ Georgia Highway 53, thence way 41, thence over U.S. Highway 41 to tion Georgia Highway 61, thence over over Georgia Highway 53 to junction junction U.S. Highway 19, thence over Georgia Highway 61 to junction U.S. U.S. Highway 41, and thence over U.S. U.S. Highway 19 to Americus (also to Highway 41, thence over U.S. Highway Highway 41 to Dalton (also over U.S. Leslie and Desoto, Ga., over U.S. High­ 41 to Calhoun, and return over the same Highway 76 to junction U.S. Highway way 280 to Desoto, Ga., and return to routes, (4) between La Grange and Ma­ 411, and thence over U.S. Highway 411 Americus), and return over the same con, Ga.; (a) from La Grange over to Tennga, and return), and return over routes, serving all intermediate points. Georgia Highway 109 to junction Georgia the same route, serving all intermediate (13) Between La Grange and Thom- Highway 18, thence over Georgia High­ points, (8) between La Grange and Cor- asville, Ga.; from La Grange over Geor­ way 18 to junction Georgia Highway 74, dele, Ga.; (a) from La Grange over gia Highway 109 to junction U.S. High­ thence over Georgia Highway 74 to junc­ Georgia Highway 109 to junction Geor­ way (Alternate) 27, thence over U.S. tion U.S. Highway 80, thence over U.S. gia Highway 18, thence over Georgia Highway (Alternate) 27 to junction Highway 80 to Macon, and (b) from Highway 18 to junction Georgia High­ Georgia Highway 85, thence over Georgia La Grange over U.S. Highway 29 to junc­ way 74, thence over Georgia Highway 74 Highway 85 to junction Georgia Highway tion U.S. Highway 23, thence over U.S. to junction U.S. Highway 80, thence over 41, thence over Georgia Highway 41 to Highway 23 to junction U.S. Highway 41, U.S. Highway 80 tp junction U.S. High­ junction Georgia Highway 90, thence thence over U.S. Highway 41 to Macon, way 41, thence over U.S. Highway 41 to over Georgia Highway 90 to iuncfion and return over the same routes, (5) be­ Cordele, and (b) from La Grange over U.S. Highway 19, thence over H.S. High­ tween La Grange and Savannah, Ga; U.S. Highway 27 to junction U.S. High­ way 19 to Thomasville (also to Boston (a) from La Grange over Georgia High­ way 280, thence over U.S. Highway 280 oyer U.S. H ;ghway 84) and return, thence way 109 to junction U.S. Highway (Al­ to Cordele (also to Hawkinsville, Ga. to Bainbridge, Ga. over U.S. ® ghway ternate) 27, thence over U.S. Highway over Georgia Highway 257 and to McRae, 84 and return to Thomasville, a (Alternate) 27 to junction Georgia (thence to Bainbridge over U.S. Hign- Highway 85, thence over Georgia High­ Ga. over U.S..Highway 280 and return), way 19 to Ochlocknee, Ga., thence ove way 85 to junction Georgia Highway 41, and return over the same routes, serv­ Georgia Highway 188 to Cairo, •> thence over Georgia Highway 41 to junc­ ing all intermediate points. (9) Between La Grange and Tifton, thence over U.S. Highway 84 to Bam- tion Georgia Highway 90, thence over bridge, G a .), and return over the sam Georgia Highway 90 to junction U.S. Ga.; from La Grange over Georgia High­ way 109 to junction Georgia Highway route, serving all intermediate P ’ Highway 41, thence over U.S. Highway (14) between La Grange and Valdosta, 41 to junction U.S. Highway 280, thence 18, thence over Georgia Highway 18 to junction Georgia Highway 74, thence Ga.; (a ) from L a Grange over Georgia over U.S. Highway 280 to junction Highway 109 to junction Ge^gia Hig^ Georgia Highway 292, thence over over Georgia Highway 74 to junction way 18, thence over Georgia Hig^w J Georgia Highway 292 to junction U.S. U.S. Highway 80, thence over U.S. High­ to junction Georgia Highway 74, .. Highway 280, thence over U.S. Highway way 80 to junction U.S. Highway 41, and thence over U.S. Highway 41 to Tifton over Georgia Highway 74 to . 280 to junction U.S. Highway 80, and (also over U.S. Highway 319 to Moultrie, UJS. Highway 80, thence ovw U . S . « ! ^ thence over U.S. Highway 80 to Savan­ Ga., and return), and return over the way 80 to junction U.S. Highway nah, (b) from La Grange over Georgia same routes serving all intermediate thence over U.S. Highway 41 Highway 109 to junction Georgia High­ points, (10) between La Grange and Ce­ Ga.; (b). from La Grange over Georew way 18, thence over Georgia Highway 18 dar Springs, Ga.; From La Grange over Highway 219 to junction Georgia Hig Thursday, M a rch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3913 way 103, thence over Georgia Highway junction Alabama Highway 22, thence junction U S. Highway 84 and Alabama 103 to junction U.S. Highway 280, thence over Alabama Highway 22 to junction Highway 134, thence over either Ala­ over U.S. Highway 280 to junction Alabama Highway 63, thence over Ala­ bama Highway 134 to junction U.S. High­ Georgia Highway 55, thence over Georgia bama Highway 63 to junction Alabama way 84, or over U.S. Highway 84 to junc­ Highway 55 to junction U.S. Highway Highway 229, thence over either Alabama tion Alabama Highway 134, and thence 82, thence over U.S. Highway 82 to junc­ Highway 229 to junction Alabama High­ over U.S. Highway 84 to Dothan) and tion Georgia Highway 133, thence over way 14, thence over Alabama Highway 14 (thence over U.S. Highway 231 to junc­ Georgia Highway 133 to junction Geor­ to junction Alabama Highway 63 or over tion Alabama Highway 134, thence over gia Highway 33, thence over Georgia Alabama Highway 63 to junction Ala­ either Alabama Highway 134 to junction Highway 33 to junction Georgia High­ bama Highway 14, thence over Alabama Alabama Highway 123 or over U.S. High­ way 94, thence over Georgia Highway Highway 14 to junction U.S. Highway way 231 to junction Alabama Highway 94 to Valdosta (also to Clyattville, Ga., 231, and thence over U.S. Highway 231 123, thence over Alabama Highway 123 to over Georgia Highway 31 and return to to Montgomery (also to Prattville, Ala., junction Alabama Highway 134, thence Valdosta), and return over the same over U.S. Highways 82 and 31 and return over Alabama Highway 134 to junction route, serving all intermediate points, to Montgomery) (thence to Troy, Ala., Alabama Highway 85, thence over either (15) between La Grange and Thom as- over U.S. Highway 231, thence over U.S. Alabama Highway 85 to junction U.S. ton, Ga.; from L a Grange over U.S. Highway 29 and Alabama Highway 10 Highway 84 or over Alabama Highway Highway 29 to junction unnumbered to Greenville, Ala., thence over either 134 to junction U.S. Highway 84, thence Georgia Highway thence over unnum­ Alabama Highway 185 to junction U.S. over U.S. Highway 84 to junction Ala­ bered Georgia Highway to junction Highway 31 or U.S. Highway 31 to junc- bama Highway 85, and thence over U.S. Georgia Highway 54, thencevover Geor­ tion Alabama Highway 185, thence over Highway 84 to Dothan), and return over gia Highway 54 to junction Georgia U.S. Highway 31 to Montgomery), and the same route, serving all intermediate Highway 85, thence over Georgia High­ return over the same route, serving all points, (6) between La Grange, Ga., and way 85 to junction U.S. Highway 41, intermediate points. Brundidge, Ala.; from La Grange over thence over U.S. Highway 41 to junction (2) Between La Grange, Ga., and Tal- US. Highway 29 to junction Alabama U.S. Highway 19, thence over U.S. H igh­ lassee, Ala.; from La Grange over U.S. Highway 37, thence over Alabama High­ way 19 to Thomaston, and return over Highway 29 to junction Alabama High- way 37 to junction Alabama Highway the same route, serving all intermediate way 14, thence over Alabama Highway 26, thence over Alabama Highway 26 points. 14 to Tallassee, and return over the same to junction U.S. Highway 29, thence route, serving all intermediate points, over U.S. Highway 29 to junction Note: Applicant states service is author­ Alabama Highway 93, and thence ized at points on the above routes only on (3) between La Grange, Ga., and Lanett, traffic moving from, to, or through La Ala., over U.S. Highway 29 (also to over Alabama Highway 93 to Brun­ Grange, Ga. Alexander City, Ala., over U.S. Highway didge, and return over the same route, 29 to Auburn, Ala., thence return over serving all intermediate points, (7) IRREGULAR ROUTES: General U.S. Highway 29 to Opelika, Ala., thence between La Grange, Ga., and Troy, commodities (except those of unusual over U.S. Highway 280 to Alexander Ala.; from La Grange over U.S. High­ value, Classes A and B explosives, house­ City, Ala., thence return over U S . High­ way 27 to junction US. Highway 431, hold goods as defined by the Commission, way 280 to junction Alabama Highway thence over US. Highway 431 to junc­ commodities in bulk, commodities re­ 50, thence over Alabama Highway 50 to tion Alabama Highway 26, thence over quiring special equipment, and those in­ Lanett), and return over the same route, Alabama Highway 26 to junction Ala­ jurious or contaminating to other lad ­ serving all intermediate points, (4) be­ bama Highway 223, thence over Alabama ing), between La Grange, Ga., on the tween La Grange, Ga., and Birmingham, Highway 223 to junction US. Highway one hand, and, on the other, points in Ala.; (a) from La Grange over Georgia 29, thence over U.S. Highway 29 to Troy, Georgia other than over the above regu­ Highway 109 and unnumbered Alabama and return over the same route, serving lar routes. Applicant further states Highway to junction Alabama Highway all intermediate points, (8) between La duplicate authority above will not be 22, thence over Alabama Highway 22 to Grange, Ga., and Evergreen, Ala.; from construed as conferring more than one junction U.S. Highway 431, thence over L a Grange over U S . Highway 29 to junc­ operating right, and the above authority U.S. Highway 431 to junction U.S. High­ tion U.S. Highway 80, thence over U S. may be tacked at common points for way 78, thence over U.S. Highway 78 to Highway 80 to junction U S . Highway 31, Purposes of joinder. Birmingham, and (b) from La Grange thence over US. Highway 31 to Ever­ REGULAR ROUTES: n General com­ over U.S. Highway 29 to junction U.S. green, and return over the same route, modities (except those of unusual value, Highway 80, thence over U S . Highway 80 serving all intermediate points. Classes A and B explosives, household to junction U S . Highway 31, thence over (9) Between La Grange, Ga., and Mo­ goods as defined by the Commission, com­ U.S. Highway 31 to Birmingham (also bile, Ala.; (a) from La Grange over U.S. modities in bulk, commodities requiring to Leeds, Ala., over U.S. Highway 78 and Highway 29 to junction U.S. Highway special equipment, and those injurious return to Birmingham) and (thence to 31, thence over U.S. Highway 31 to Mo­ or contaminating to other ladin g), (1) Bessemer, Ala., over U.S. Highway 11 and bile, (b) from La Grange, Ga., over U S. between La Grange, Ga. and Montgom­ return to Birmingham), and return over Highway 29 to junction U S . Highway 80, ery, Ala.; (a) from L a Grange over U.S. the same route, serving all intermediate thence over U.S. Highway 80 to junction Highway 29 to junction U.S. Highway 80, points. U.S. Highway 31, thence over U S. High­ thence over U.S. Highway 80 to M ont­ (5) Between La Grange, Ga., and way 31 to Mobile, (c) from La Grange gomery, (b) from La Grange over U.S. Dothan, Ala.; (a) from La Grange over over U.S. Highway 29 to junction U.S. Highway 29 to junction Alabama High­ Georgia Highway 219 to junction Georgia Highway 80, thence over U S . Highway 80 way 50, thence over Alabam a H igh­ Highway 103, thence over Georgia High­ to junction Alabama Highway 22, thence ly 50 to junction U.S. Highway way 103 to junction U S. Highway 431, over Alabama Highway 22 to junction thence over U.S. Highway 280 and thence over US. Highway 431 to Alabama Highway 5, thence over Ala­ to junction Alabama Highway 49, thence Dothan, and (b) from La Grange over bama Highway 5 to junction U S. High­ over Alabama Highway 49 to junction Georgia Highway 219 to junction Georgia way 43, thence over U S. Highway 43 to Alabama Highway 14, thence over either Highway 103, thence over Georgia High­ Mobile (also over US. Highway 43 to unnumbered Alabama Highway to junc- way 103 to junction U.S. Highway 27, Satsuma (LeMoyne), Ala., and return)., J?n Highway 231 or over Alabama thence over U.S. Highway 27 to junction and return over the same route, serving ,,f™ ay 14 to junction U.S. Highway Georgia Highway 62, thence over Georgia all intermediate points, (10) between "i, thence over U.S. Highway 231 to Highway 62 to junction Alabama High­ La Grange, Ga., and Decatur, Ala.; (a) nv TT°mei7 ’ an<* (° ) from L a Grange from La Grange over Georgia Highway Highway to junction Georgia way 52, and thence over Alabama High­ er u.S. 29 109 qnd unnumbered Alabama Highway g™ a y 238, thence over Georgia High- way 52 to Dothan (also over U S. High­ to junction U.S. Highway 431, thence ay 238 and unnumbered Alabama High- way 431 to junction Alabama Highway over US. Highway 431 to junction U.S. ay to junction U.S. Highway 431, thence 10, thence over Alabama Highway 10 to Highway 278, thence over U S. Highway ‘ Highway-431 to junction un­ junction U.S. Highway 231, thence re­ 278 to junction U S . Highway 231, thence umbered Alabama Highway, thence turn over U.S. Highway 231 to DOthan) over U.S. Highway 231 to junction Ala- er unnumbered Alabama Highway tc (thence over Alabama Highway 52 to 3914 NOTICES

bama Highway 67, thence over Alabama junction UJS. Highway 78, thence over 30 to Lancaster, Pa., thence over U.S. H ighway 67 or TJ.S. Highway 278 to junc­ U.S. Highway 78 to Birmingham), and Highway 222 and Pennsylvania High­ tion U.S. Highway 31, thence over U.S. return over the same route serving all way 72 to junctions U.S. Highway 230) Highway 31 to Decatur, (b) from La intermediate points, (14) between La thence over Pennsylvania Highway 283 Grange over Georgia Highway 109 and Grange, Ga., and Anniston, Ala.; from La to junction Interstate Highway 83 (near unnumbered Alabama Highway to junc­ Grange over Georgia Highway 109 and Harrisburg), thence over Interstate tion U.S. Highway 431, thence over U.S. unnumbered Alabama Highway to junc­ Highway 83 to Harrisburg, and return Highway 431 to junction U.S. Highway tion U.S. Highway 431, thence over U.S. over the same route. (2) Between Wil­ 78, thence over U.S. Highway 78 to junc­ Highway 431 to Anniston (also to Talla­ mington, Del., and the junction of Del­ tion UJS, Highway 31, and thence over dega, Ala., over Alabama Highway 21, aware Highways 48 and 41 (at or near U.S. Highway 31, to Decatur (also to and return), (thence to Bynum, Anniston Hockessin, D e l.); from Wilmington over Cullman, Ala., over U.S. Highway 31 and Ordnance Depot, Ala., over either Ala­ Delaware Highway 48 to junction Dela­ return) (thence to Florence, Ala., over bama Highway 202 or over UJS. High­ ware Highway 41, and return over the U.S. Highway 31 to junction U.S. High­ way 78, and return), (thence to Heflin, same route. (3) Between Wilmington, way 72, thence over U.S. Highway 72 to Ala., over U.S. Highway 78 and return), Del., and Avondale, Pa.; from Wilming- junction Alabama Highway 20 (U.S. (thence to Guntersville, Ala., over U.S. tomover U.S. Highway 202 to junction Highway 72 (Alternate)), thence over Highway 431 and return), (thence over U.S. Highway l (near Concordville, Pa.), either Alabama Highway 184 to junction UJS. Highway 431 to junction U.S. High­ thence over U.S. Highway 1 to Avondale, Alabama Highway 101, thence over Ala­ way 11, thence over U.S. Highway 11 to and return over the same route. (4) bama Highway 101 to junction Alabama Ft. Payne, Ala., and return) and (thence Between Wilmington, DeL, and junction Highway 20 (U.S. Highway 72 (Alter­ to Gadsden, Ala., over U.S. Highway 431 Pennsylvania Highway 52 and U.S. High­ nate)) or over Alabama Highway 20 (U.S. and return), and return over the same way 1 (at dr near Hamorton, Pa.); from Highway 72 (Alternate)) to junction Ala­ route, serving all intermediate points. W ilmington over Delaware Highway 52 bama Highway 101, thence over Alabama to the Delaware-Pennsylvania State Highway 20 (U.S. Highway 72 (Alter­ N o te: Applicant states service Is au­ thorized at points on the above route only line, and thence over Pennsylvania nate) to Decatur) (thence to Huntsville, on traffic moving from, to, or through La Highway 52 to junction U.S. Highway Ala., over U.S. Highway 31 to junction Grange, Ga. 1, and return over the same route. (5) U.S. Highway 72, thence over U.S. High­ Between Wilmington, Del., and the IRREGULAR ROUTES: General com­ way 72 to junction Alabama Highway 20 junction Delaware Highways 2 and 41 modities (except those of unusual value, (U.S. Highway 72 (Alternate)), thence (at or near Newport, D e l.); from Wil­ Classes A and B explosives, household over either unnumbered Alabama High­ mington over Delaware Highway 2 to goods as defined by the Commission, way over Madison, Ala., to junction Ala­ junction Delaware Highway 41, and re­ bama Highway 20 (U.S. Highway 72 (Al­ commodities in bulk, commodities re­ turn over the same route. (6) Between ternate) ) or over Alabama Highway 20 quiring special equipment, and those in­ Wilmington, Del., and New York, N.Y.; (U.S. Highway 72 (Alternate)) to junc­ jurious or contaminating to other lad­ (a ) from Wilmington over U.S. Highway tion unnumbered Alabama Highway ing), between La Grange, Ga., on the 13 to junction U.S. Highway 40 (south (near Mooresville), thence over Alabama one hand, and, on the other, points in of W ilm ington), thence over U.S. High­ Highway 20 (U.S. Highway 72 (Alter­ Alabama other than when over the above way 40 to junction New Jersey Turnpike, nate) to Decatur) and return over the regular routes. Duplicate authority thence over the New Jersey Turnpike to same route, serving all intermediate above will hot be construed as confer­ junction U.S. Highway 46 (at or near points. ring more than one operating right. The Palisades Park, N.J.), thence over U.S, (11) Between La Grange, Ga., and above authority may be tacked at com­ Highway 46 to junction U.S. Highway Huntsville, Ala.; from La Grange over mon points for purposes of joinder.' Ap­ 1 (at or near Palisades Park, N.J.), Georgia Highway 109 and unnumbered plicant has submitted duplicative routes thence over U.S. Highway 1 to New Alabama Highway to junction U.S. High­ to distinguish between line-haul opera­ York, and return over the same route, way 431, thence over U.S. Highway 431 tions and peddle-run operations. This (b ) from Wilmington over U.S. Highway to Huntsville, and return over the same application is filed pursuant to M C-C- 13 to junction U.S. Highway 40 (south route, serving all intermediate points, 4366, effective M ay 1, 1964, which of W ilm ington), thence over U.S. High­ (12) between La Grange, Ga., and Flor­ provides the special rules for conversion way 40 to junction U.S. Highway 130 ence, Ala.; from La Grange over Georgia of irregular route to regular motor car­ (near Deepwater, N .J .), thence over U.S. Highway 109 and unnumbered Alabama rier operations. Highway 130 to junction UJS. Highway Highway to junction Alabama Highway Special N o te: Protests to this applica­ 1 (near New Brunswick, N.J.) (also from 22, thence oyer Alabama Highway 22 to tion may be filed within 45 days Instead of 30 the junction U.S. Highway 130 and In­ junction Alabama Highway 77, thence days. terstate Highway 295 near Westville, over Alabama Highway 77 to junction No. MC 87109 (Sub-No. 1), filed March N.J., over Interstate Highway 295 to U.S. Highway 278, thence over U.S. High­ 1, 1965. Applicant: MASTEN TRANS­ junction New Jersey Highway 73, near way 278 to junction Alabama Highway PORTATION, INC., Rehoboth Boule­ M aple Shade, N.J., thence over New 157 and thence over Alabama Highway vard, Milford,- Del. Applicant’s attor­ Jersey Highway 73 to junction U.S. High­ 157 to Florence and return over the same ney: J. G. Dail, Jr., 2001 Massachusetts way 130, near Parry, N .J .), thence over route, serving all intermediate points, Avenue NW., Washington, D.C., 20036. U.S. Highway 1 to New York, and re­ (13) between La Grange, Ga., and Rus­ Authority sought to operate as a common turn over the same route. sellville, Ala.; from La Grange over U.S. carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular (7) Between Wilmington, Del., and Highway 29 to junction Georgia High­ routes, transporting: General commodi­ ¡unction Delaware Highway 9 and U.S. way 238, thence over Georgia Highway highway 40 (south of ties (except those of unusual value, Wilmington); 238 and unnumbered Alabama Highway :rom Wilmington over Delaware High- Classes A and B explosives, household to junction U.S. Highway 431, thence goods as defined by the Commission, com­ vay 9 to junction U.S. Highway 40, and over U.S. Highway 431 to junction Ala­ modities in bulk, commodities requiring *etum over the same route. (8) Be- bama Highway 50, thence over Alabama iween junction U.S. Highway special equipment, and those injurious or 1 and Highway 50 to junction U.S. Highway Pruck U.S. Highway 1 (at or contaminating to other lading). (1) Be­ near Ho- 280, thence over U.S. Highway 280 to >oken, N.J.) and New York, N.Y.; tween Wilmington, Del., and Harrisburg, from junction U.S. Highway 78, thence over unction U.S. Highway and Pa.; from Wilmington over U.S. High­ 1 Truck u.b. lighway over Truck U.S. U.S. Highway 78 to junction Alabama way 13 to junction Delaware Highway 1 Highway ind the Holland Tunnel to New Yorx, Highway 5, thence over Alabama High­ 41 (at or near New Castle, Del.), thence way 5 to junction U.S. Highway 43, md return over the same route. ( over Delaware Highway 41 to the Dela- Jetween junction New Jersey Turnpi thence over U.S. Highway 43 to Russell­ ware-Pennsylvania State line, thence md Truck U.S. Highway 1 (at or near ville (thence return over U.S. Highway over Pennsylvania Highway 41 to Gap, lewark, N.J.) and New York, N.Y.; from 43 through Fayette to junction Alabama Pa., thence over U.S. Highway 30 to junc­ unction New Jersey Turnpike ana Highway 18, thence over Alabama High­ tion U.S. Highway 230 (near Lancaster, way 18 to junction Alabama Highway 69, Pa.), thence over U.S. Highway 230 to Truck U.S. Highway 1 over , t0 thence over Alabama Highway 69 to High Spire, Pa. (also over U.S. Highway lighway 1 and the Holland Tunn Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3915

New York, and return over the same (II) Between Meadville, Mo., and routes must move to or from Meadville, route. (10) Between junction New Jer­ Rockford, Hl.,^(l) from Meadville over Mo., or points within ten (10) miles sey Turnpike and New Jersey Highway U.S. Highway 36 to its junction with U.S. thereof, (2) the above described routes 3 (near Secaucus, N.J.) and New York, Highway 24, thence over U.S. Highway 24 may not be tacked at Meadville, Mo., or N.Y.; from junction New Jersey Turn­ to its junction with U.S. Highway 61, points within ten (10) miles thereof, in pike and New Jersey Highway 3 over thence over U.S. Highway 61 to its junc­ conjunction with carriers’ irregular route New Jersey Highway 3 and the Lincoln tion with U.S. Highway 67, thence over authority to serve between Meadville, Tunnel to New York, and return over U.S. Highway 136 to its junction with Mo., and points within ten (10) miles the same route. (11) Between junction U.S. Highway 67, thence over U.S. High­ thereof, on the one hand, and, on the Ü.S. Highway 1 and New Jersey Highway way 67 to its junction with Illinois High­ other, points in Illinois, Iowa, and Mis­ 3 (near Secaucus, N.J.) and New York, way 2, thence over Illinois Highway 2 to souri, and (3) the above described routes N.Y.; from junction Ü.S. Highway 1 and Rockford, and return over the same may not be tacked one to another at New Jersey Highway 3 over New Jersey route, and (2) from Meadville over U.S. Meadville, Mo., or points within ten (10) Highway 3 and the Lincoln Tunnel to Highway 36 to its junction with U.S. miles thereof, and (V H I) between Chilli­ New York, and return over the same Highway 24, thence over U.S. Highway 24 cothe, Mo., and Des Moines, Iowa, from route, serving all intermediate points to its junction with U.S. Highway 61, Chillicothe over U.S. Highway 65 to Des and the off-route points in New Jersey, thence over U.S. Highway 61 to its junc­ Moines, and return over the same route, those in Delaware, and those in that tion with U.S. Highway 67, thence over serving all intermediate points. This ap­ part of Pennsylvania east of U.S. High­ U.S. Highway 67 to its junction with plication is filed pursuant to MC-C-4366, way 220 (except Philadelphia, Pa., and Illinois Highway 2, thence over Illinois effective May 1, 1964, which provides the points between Philadelphia and W il­ Highway 2 to Rockford, and return over special rules for conversion of irregular mington east of U.S. Highway 13), in the same route, (III) between Meadville, route to regular motor carriers op­ (1) through (11) above. Mo., and Dubuque, Iowa, from Meadville erations. over U.S. Highway 36 to its junction with Note: This application is filed pursuant Special N o te: Protests to this application to MC-C-4366, effective May 1, 1964, which U.S. Highway 24, thence over U.S. High­ may be filed within 45 days instead of 30 provides the special rules for conversion of way 24 to its junction with U.S. Highway days. irregular route to regular route carrier oper­ 61, thence over U.S. Highway 61 to No. MC 108937 (Sub-No. 25), filed ations. Dubuque, and return over the same route, March 1, 1965. Applicant: MURPHY Special Note: Protests to this application (IV) between Meadville, Mo., and Fair- MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., 965 may be filed within 45 days instead of 30 field, Iowa, from Meadville over U.S. days. Eustis Street, St. Paul, Minn., 55114. A p ­ Highway 36 to its junction with U.S. plicant’s representative: Raymond L. No. MC 10343 (Sub-No. 10), filed Feb­ Highway 24, thence over U.S. Highway 24 Stevens (same address as applicant). ruary 19,1965. Applicant: CHURCHILL to its junction with U.S. Highway 61, Authority sought to operate as a common TRUCK LINES, INC., Highway 36 West, thence over U.S. Highway 61 to its junc­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular Chillicothe, Mo. Applicant’s attorney: tion with U.S. Highway 34, thence over routes, transporting: General commod­ James E. Wilson, 111T E Street NW„ U.S. Highway 34 to Fairfield, and return ities (except those of unusual value, Washington, D.C. Authority sought to over the same route, (V) between Mead­ Classes A and B explosives, household operate as a common carrier, by motor ville, Mo., and Cedar Rapids, Iowa, (1) goods as defined by the Commission, vehicle, o v er r e g u la r routes, transport­ from Meadville over U.S. Highway 36 to commodities in bulk, commodities re­ ing: General commodities (except those its junction with U.S. Highway 24, thence quiring special equipment, and those in­ of unusual value, Classes A and B explo­ over U.S. Highway 24 to its junction with jurious or contaminating to other lad­ sives, household goods as defined by the U.S. Highway 61, thence over U.S. High­ ing) , serving Fergus Falls, Minn., as an Commission, commodities in bulk, com­ way 61 to its junction with U.S. Highway intermediate point in connection with modities requiring special equipment, 218, thence over U.S. Highway 218 to applicant’s authorized regular-route op­ and those injurious or contaminating to Cedar Rapids, and return over the same erations between St. Paul, Minn., and other la d in g ), (I) between Meadville, route, and (2) from Meadville over U.S. Wahpeton, N. Dak. Mo., and C h ica go , 111., (1) from Meadville Highway 36 to its junction with U.S. over U.S. H ig h w a y 36 to its junction with Highway 63, thence over U.S. Highway 63 N o te: Applicant states its regular-route authority sought to be converted is as fol­ kkT' HighwaY 66 (Interstate Highway to its junction with Iowa Highway 149, lows: Between points in Minnesota within 55) • thence over U.S. Highway 66 (Inter­ thence over Iowa Highway 149 to its 35 miles of Breckenridge, Minn., including state H ig h w a y 55) to Chicago? and re- junction with Iowa Highway 92, thence Breckenridge. After conversion, the above "Jrn over th e same route, (2) from over Iowa Highway 92 to its junction with authority would be restricted as follows: Be­ Meadville over U.S. Highway 36 to its Iowa Highway 1, thence over Iowa High­ tween points in Minnesota within 35 miles junction with U.S. Highway 24,''thence way 1 to its junction with U.S. Highway of Breckenridge, Minn., except Fergus Falls, ttT Highway 24 to its junction with 218, thence over U.S. Highway ,218 to but including Breckenridge. This applica­ siu ,*~g^way 66 (Interstate Highway Cedar Rapids, and return over the same tion is filed pursuant to MC-O-4366, effective ’ thence over U.S. Highway 66 (Inter- route, (VI) between Meadville, Mo., and May 1, 1964, which provides the special rules for conversion of irregular route to regular nvo ef?lg^way ^ to Chicago, and return Waterloo, Iowa, from Meadville over U.S. motor carriers operations. ZZ TT o Sa^ e route> (3) from Meadville Highway 36 to its junction with U.S. Special N o t e : Protests to this application tt q tt‘S: 'highway 36 to its junction with H ighway 63, thence over U.S. Highway 63 may be filed within 45 days instead of 30 J ' highway 24, thence over U.S. High- to Waterloo, and return over the same days. fii fu t0 lts junction with U.S. Highway route, (VH) between Meadville, and No. MC 109132 (Sub-No. 17), filed Kansas City, Mo., (1) from Meadville iimoHnce .over u -s - Highway 61 to its February 23,1965. Applicant: F R E IG H T over U.S. Highway 36 to its junction with ovptttq u-s- Highway 34, thence W AYS, INC., 1209 North Mosley, Wichita, tnm Highway 34 to Chicago, and re- Interstate Highway 29, thence over In­ Kans. Applicant’s attorney: Went­ terstate Highway 29 to Kansas City, and Sdvfii^ the Same route» (4) from worth E. Griffin, 1221 Baltimore Avenue, C i ?ver U.S. Highway 36 to its return over the same route, and (2) from Kansas City, Mo., 64105. Authority Meadville over U.S. Highway 36 to its over tt° q U S - Highway 63, thence sought to operate as a common carrier, U s u lghwfty 63 to its junction with junction with U.S. Highway 65, thence by motor vehicle? over regular routes, over U.S. Highway 65 to its junction with wav thence over U.S. High- transporting: General commodities (ex­ samp rZZ Chlcag°. and return over the U.S. Highway 24, thence over U.S. High­ cept those of unusual value, and except U r rr-01^6’ anc* (5) from Meadville over way 24 to Kansas dity, and return over Classes A and B explosives, livestock, Hie-hn hr ay 3610 its junction with U.S. the same route. household goods as defined by the Com­ toghway 65, thence over U.S. Highway 65 N ote: Applicant states that service is au­ mission, commodities in bulk and those 80 Junctlon with Interstate Highway thorized to and from all intermediate points injurious or contaminating to other t o i S C!-°Ver Inter®tate Highway 80 on the above described-routes and all off- lading), between Kingdom City, and St, With U -S- Highway 66 (In - route points in Iowa, those in Missouri and Louis, Mo., over U.S. Highway 40, serving Illinois, on and north of U.S. Highway 40. HighwavIii1fhway 55) ’ thence over U.S. no intermediate points. X S f 6®,interstate Highway 55) to RESTRICTIONS: (1) All traffic mov­ N o t e : Applicant states that no traffic des­ ’ anc^ return over the same route. ing between points on the above described tined to the Chicago Commercial Zone, as No. 57----- 9 3916 NOTICES

defined, by the Commission, shall be picked B. Piper, 47 Ramsdell Avenue, Buffalo, torney: Preston L. Davis, 37 Arch Street up in the St. Louis Commercial Zone, as de­ N.Y., 14216. Authority sought to oper­ fined by the Commission, for transportation Milton, Pa., 17847. Authority sought to via, or interchange at Kingdom City. No ate as a common carrier, by motor vehi­ operate as a contract carrier, by motor duplicating authority is sought./ This appli­ cle, over regular routes, transporting: vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ cation is filed pursuant to MC-C-4366, ef­ (1) General commodities (except those ing: Potassium silicate, in bulk, in fective May 1,1964, which provides the special of unusual value, Classes A and B explo­ shipper-owned tank vehicles, from To- rules for conversion of irregular route to sives, livestock, household goods as de­ wanda, Pa., to Augusta, Ga. regular motor carrier operations. fined in Practices of Motor Common Car­ N o te: Applicant is authorized to conduct Special N o te: Protests to this application riers of Household Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467 may be filed within 45 days instead of 30 operations as a common carrier in Certificate days. commodities in bulk and those requiring No. MC 105351, therefore dual operations may special equipment), between Detroit, be involved. No. MC 109132 (Sub-No. 18), filed Mich., and the ports of entry located on No. M C 111231 (Sub-No. 62), filed March 1, 1965. Applicant: FREIGHT the international boundary line between M arch 1, 1965. Applicant: JONES W AYS, 3NC„ 1309 North Mosley, Wichita, the United States and Canada located TRUCK LINES, INC., 610 East Emma Kans. Applicant’s attorney : Wentworth at Detroit, Mich., over city streets, serv­ Avenue, Springdale, Ark. Applicant’s E. Griffin, 1221 Baltimore Avenue, Kan­ ing all intermediate points; and (2) gen­ attorney: W entworth E. Griffin, 1221 sas City 5, Mo. Authority sought to eral commodities (except livestock and Baltimore Avenue, Kansas City 5, Mo. operate as a common carrier, by motor household goods as defined in Practices Authority sought to operate as a common vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ of Motor Common Carriers of Household carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular ing: General commodities (except those Goods, 17 M.C.C. 467), between Port Hu­ routes, transporting: General commodi- of unusual value, and except dangerous ron, Mich., and the ports of entry located ties (except those of unusual value, and explosives, livestock, household goods as on the international boundary line be­ except dangerous explosives, household defined by the Commission, commodities tween the United States and Canada lo­ goods as defined by the Commission, in bulk and those injurious or contam­ cated at Port Huron, Mich., over city commodities in bulk, commodities re­ inating to other lading), (1) between streets, serving all intermediate points quiring special equipment, and those Wichita, Kans., and Liberal, Kans.: From and those off-route points within 8 miles Wichita over U.S. Highway 54 to Liberal, injurious or contaminating to other lad­ of'the junction of Military and Water in g), (1) between the junction of Arkan­ and return over the same route, serving Streets, Port Huron, Mich. all intermediate points (except those be­ sas Highway 135 and U.S. Highway 63 N o te: This application is filed pursuant tween Wichita and Pratt) ; (2) between near Deckerville, Ark., and the junction to MC-C-4366, which provides the special of Missouri Highway 108 and Missouri the junction U.S. Highways 54 and 154 rules for conversion of irregular-route to and Garden City, Kans. : From the junc­ Highway 25 near Arbyrd, Mo.: From the regular-route motor carrier operations. junction of Arkansas Highway 135 and tion U.S. Highways 54 and 154 over U.S. Special N o te: Protests to this application U.S. Highway 63 over Arkansas Highway Highway 154 to Dodge City, Kans., may be filed within 45 days instead of 30 135 to junction with Arkansas Highway thence over U.S. Highway 50 to Garden days. City, and return over the same route, 18 near Black Oak, thence over Arkan­ No. MC 110325 (Sub-No. 36), filed sas Highway 18 to junction with Arkan­ serving all intermediate points; (3) be­ February 26, 1965. Applicant: TRANS- tween Garden City, Kans., and Liberal, sas Highway 119, thence over Arkansas CON LINES, a corporation, 1206 South H ighway 119 to Leachville, Ark., thence Kans.: From Garden City over U.S. Maple, Los Angeles, Calif. Applicant^ over Arkansas Highway 77 to the Arkan­ Highway 83 to Liberal, and return over attorney: Wentworth E. Griffin, 1221 sas-Missouri State line, thence over Mis­ the same route, serving all intermediate Baltimore Avenue, Kansas City 5, Mo. souri Highway 108 to junction with points; (4) between Dodge City, Kans., Authority sought to operate as a com­ Missouri Highway 25 near Arbyrd, and and Miiineola, Kans.: From Dodge City mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over return over the same route, serving all over U.S. Highway 283 to Minneola, and regular routes, transporting: General intermediate points in Arkansas; (2) return over the same route, serving all commodities (except Classes A and B ex­ between Blytheville, Ark., and Campbell, intermediate points; (5) between New­ plosives, livestock, grain, petroleum Mo., from Blytheville over U.S. Highway ton, Kans., and Hutchinson, Kans.: From products in bulk, household goods as 61 to Steele, Mo., thence over Missouri Newton over U.S. Highway 50 to Hutch­ defined by the Commission and commod­ Highway 164 to its junction with Coun­ inson, and return over the same route, ities requiring special equipment), serv­ ty Highway NN, thence over County serving all intermediate points and the ing Springfield, 111., and Monroe City, Highway N N to junction Missouri High­ off-route point of Halstead; (6) between Mo., as joinder points in connection with way 84, thence over Missouri Highway Wichita, Kans., and Hutchinson, Kans.: applicant’s authorized regular-route op­ 84 to junction Missouri Highway 25, From Wichita over Kansas Highway 96 to erations. 7 thence over Missouri Highway 25 to Hol­ Hutchinson, and return over the same N o te: Applicant states that the above pro­ comb, thence over Missouri Highway ¡» route, serving all intermediate points; to Campbell, and return over the same (7) between Wellington, Kans., and Ar­ posed authority is contingent upon the con­ summation of the transaction proposed in route, serving all intermediate pointy kansas City, Kans.: From Wellington MC—P 8923 (TraUBcon Lines-Purchase- (3 ) between Jonesboro, Ark., and Fig* over U.S. Highway 160 to Winfield, Indianapolis-Kansas City Motor Express gott, Ark., from Jonesboro over Arkansas thence over U.S. Highway 77 to Arkansas Company, et a l ). Highway 1 to Piggott, and return o City, and return over the same route, No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 710), filed the same route, serving all mtermediat serving all intermediate points and the points; (4) between Jonesboro, Ark., an March 5, 1965. Applicant: CHEMICAL off-route point of Strother Air Force Blytheville, Ark., from Jonesboro ove Base (Strother Industrial Complex); LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 East Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. Arkansas Highway 18 to Blytheville, and (8) between South Haven, Kans., return over the' same route, serVX^ and Arkansas City, Kans.: From South Applicant’s attorneys: Leonard A. Jas- kiewicz, Madison Bldg., 1155 15th Street intermediate points; (5) between Haven over U.S. Highway 166 to Arkan­ NW., Washington, D.C., and Edwin H. gould, Ark., and the junction of Arkan sas City, and return over the same route, van Deusen, 520 East Lancaster Avenue, Highway 135 and U.S. H ighw ay , serving all intermediate points/ Downingtown, Pa. Authority sought to Paragould over Arkansas Highway N o t e : This application is filed pursuant operate as a common carrier, by motor to junction U.S. Highway 63, and re_ to M C-C 4366, effective May 1, 1964, which vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ turn over the same route, se^ ngc;ftrvillg provides the special rules for conversion of ing: Tolylene di isocyanate, in bulk, in termediate points; and ^ f y.S. irregular to regular motor carrier operations. tank vehicles, from Natrium, W. Va., to points in Arkansas on and east ^ Special N o te: Protests to this application Highways 63 and 67 as off^oute PO^d may be filed within 45 days instead of 30 Dover, N.H. days. No. MC 111002 (Sub-No. 22), filed in connection with the ah°ve March 3, 1965. Applicant: CLARA routes and applicant’s presently No. M C 109616 (Sub-No. 16), filed Feb­ MILES SCHREYER, FRANCES H. ized regular route operations. ruary 26, 1965. Applicant: CONSOLI­ MILES AND THOMAS M. MILES, a N ote: This application is DATED TRUCK LINES LIMITED, 775 partnership, doing business as T. M. to M C-C—4366, effective Ma? ^ o i The Queensway, Toronto, Ontario, Can­ MILES OIL COMPANY, 306 Railroad provides the special rules * operation*- ada. Applicant’s representative: Floyd Avenue, Milton, Pa. Applicant’s at­ irregular to regular motor carrier P Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3917

Special Note: Protests to this application Montpelier, Middlesex, and Waterbury, Street, San Francisco, Calif., 94106. Au­ may be filed within 45 days instead of 30 Vt. thority sought to operate as a common days. No. MC 125215 (Sub-No. 3) (Clarifica­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular No. MC 113642 (Sub-No. 15), filed tion) , filed February 10, 1965, published routes, transporting: Passengers and March 5, 1965. Applicant: W IN N F ederal R egister issue of M arch 3, 1965, their baggage, and express and news­ TRUCKING SERVICE, INC., 210 E d ­ clarified M arch 15,1965, and republished papers in the same vehicle with passen­ wards Avenue, Horse Cave, Ky. Appli­ as. clarified this issue. Applicant: gers. (1) Revision of Califomia Routes cant’s attorney: Ollie L. Merchant, 140 RENTSCHLER GRAIN CO. INC., R.R. Nos. 230 and 232 on Certificate Sheet No. South Fifth Street, Louisville 2, Ky. A u ­ No. 6, Rochester, Ind., Applicant’s at­ 43. (a) Reauthorize a segment of pres­ thority sought to operate as a contract torney: Warren C. Moberly, 1212 ent regular Route No. 230 between San carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Fletcher Trust Building, Indianapolis, Clemente and San Diego, over U.S. High­ routes, transporting: (1) Conduit pipe, Ind. Authority sought to operate as a way 101, and incorporate said segment and fittings therefor, from Horse Cave, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over as a segment of regular Route No. 232, Ky., to points in Missouri within 300 irregular routes, transporting: Nitrogen (b) incidental thereto, revise the south­ miles of Horse Cave, Ky., and (2) iron fertilizer solutions and ammoniating so­ ern terminus of Route No. 230 to read and steel multiplate and tunnel liners, lutions, from the site of the storage ter­ “San Clemente’’ instead of “San Diego”, and bolts, channels, crowder bars, and minal of Southern Nitrogen Co., Inc., and revise the southern terminus of nuts, when shipped with and used in the located at or near Fulton, Ind. to points Route No. 232 to read “San Diego” rather assembly of multiplate and tunnel lines in Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio. than “San Clemente” and (c) reauthorize (except in each instance articles which, N ote: The purpose of this republication is present regular Route No. 233-D as a because of their size, shape, or weight, to more clearly set forth the location of the segment of regular Route No. 232 in lieu require the use of special equipment, or origin point. of present segment of route over un­ special handling for their loading, un­ numbered highways between North No. M C 127013, filed February 23,1965. loading or transportation), from Horse Santa Ana and Red Hill Junction, herein Applicant: NELS C. HILSEN AND Cave, Ky., to points in Missouri, within proposed to be revoked, to read as fol­ ARLEN O. HILSEN, a partnership, doing 300 miles of Horse Cave, Ky. lows: (a) “230. between Los Angeles and business as N. C. HILSEN & SON, Post No. MC 114194 (Sub-No. 94), filed San Clemente: from Los Angeles over Office Box 283, Southey, Saskatchewan, March 8, 1965. Applicant: K R E iD E R unnumbered highway via Huntington Canada. Applicant’s attorney: Gene A. TRUCK SERVICE, INC., 8003 Collins­ Park and Long Beach to Seal Beach, Picotte, Loble Building,. Helena, Mont., ville Road, East St. Louis, 111. Authority thence over California Highway 1 to 59601. Authority sought to operate as a sought to operate as a common carrier, junction U.S. Highway 101 (San Cle­ contract carrier, by motor vehicle, over by motor vehicle, over irregular routes,' mente),” and (b) “232. between Los regular routes, transporting: Rock­ transporting: Syrups, sweeteners and Angeles and San Diego: from Los Angeles picking machinery and plows, (1) be­ blends, in. bulk, from Edinburg, Ind., to over unnumbered highway via Pico, Full­ tween the port of entry located on the points in New Jersey, New York, Con­ erton, and Anaheim to junction U.S. international boundary line between the necticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Highway 101 (Miraflores), thence over United States and Canada located at or Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire, U.S. Highway 101 to San Diego.” (2) near Raymond, Mont., and Great Falls, and returned and rejected shipments, on Revision of California Routes Nos. 233-D Mont.; from the port of entry located return. and 233-E on Certificate Sheet No. 43A: on the international boundary line be­ No. MC 115841 (Sub-No. 225), filed (a) Reauthorize Route No. 233-D as a tween the United States and Canada lo­ ?™1Jlary 26, 1965. Applicant: C O LO ­ Segment of regular Route No. 232 as indi­ cated at or near Raymond, over Mon­ NIAL refrigerated t r a n s p o r ­ cated in (1) subparagraph (c) supra, (bj tana Highway 256 to Plenty wood, Mont., t a t i o n , INC., 1215 Bankhead High­ revise Route No. 233-E by reauthorizing thence south over Montana Highway 16 way West, Post Office Box 2169, Birm ing­ a segment of present regular Route No. to Culbertson, Mont., thence west over ham, Ala. Authority sought to operate 233-E between Oceanside Junction and U.S. Highway 2 to Havre, Mont., thence as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, junction unnumbered highway (Elm southwesterly over U.S. Highway 87 to over irregular routes, transporting: Street), and authorize the segment of Great Falls, and return over the same f°ods, from the plant site and said unnumbered highway between that route, serving no intermediate points; h o u se s of Town Square Foods, Inc., junction and junction of U.S. Highway (2) between the port of entry located mke City, Pa., to Baltimore, Md. 101 in Carlsbad as a segment of regular on the international boundary line be­ Route No. 233-E in lieu of the present 116886 (Sub-No. 25), filed tween the United States and Canada segment of said route between the junc­ m o t o r ’i£65- Applicant: HOWELL’S located at or near Sweetgrass, Mont., h e i g h t , INCORPORATED, tion of Elm Street and Carlsbad Junction and Great Falls, Mont., over U.S. High­ WmstOTi Avenue SW „ Roanoke, Va. and (c) incidental to the relief requested way 91, serving no intermediate points; sought to operate as a common in subparagraph (b) above, revise the car w w (3) between the port of entry located on mn, hy motor vehicle, over irregular the international boundary line between termini of said Route No. 233-E to read outes, transporting: Toilet preparations, “Oceanside” and “Carlsbad”, respec­ the United States and Canada located at tively, to read as follows: (a) “233-D. thprp,fLVn^i^ls so^ in conjunction or near Raymond, Mont., and Helena, with, between Kingsport, and Bris- intentionally left blank,” and (b) “233-E. Mont.; from the port of entry located in To«nn'’ and Brist°l- Va., and points on the international boundary line be­ between Oceanside and Carlsbad: from junction U.S. Highway 101 and unnum­ wav S SSef on and of U.S. H igh- tween the United States and Canada bered highway in Oceanside, over un­ west nf’TTaQdJ?0ints in Virginia on and located at or near Raymond, to Havre, west of U.s. Highway 21. numbered highway to junction U.S. Mont., as specified in (1) above, thence Maroh°‘ MC o 121574 voud (Sub-No.- ino. 6 3), ), meafiled over U.S. Highway 87 to Great Falls, Highway 101 in Carlsbad.” (3) Revision of California Routes Nos. PATplAi9?5- Applmant: NELSON A. Mont., thence over U.S. Highway 91 to tornev-’ v t- Applicant’s at- Helena, and return over the same route, 237 and 238 on Certificate Sheet No. 44: Street i\/rP1+tcl?ar B- Joslin> 87 M ain serving no intermediate points; and (4) (a) Authorize the segment of California to ope’r^tpntpelier’ Vt> Authority sought between the port of entry located on the Highway 91 between West Corona Junc­ tor vphipf as a common carrier, by m o- international boundary line between the tion and Riverside as a segment of Route portinp-. % over irresular routes, trans- United States and Canada located at No. 237 in lieu of the present segment of those nf ,~reneral commodities (except Sweetgrass, Mont., and Helena, Mont., said route over former U.S. Highway 91 KSUal vaIue' Classes A and B over U.S. Highway 91, serving no inter­ between these points, which is herein proposed to be revoked, (b) reauthorize the Comm, k?usehold goods as defined by mediate points. thoseSm!fS10n commodities in bulk, and present alternate Route No. 244 between tween Rn^.nnf , special equipment), be- M otor C arriers o f P assengers North Camp Elliott Junction and South MlMeSf6' f 0Uth Barre- No. MC 1515 (Sub-No. 77), filed Feb­ Camp Elliott Junction over U.S. High­ one w f ’ aPd Waterbury, Vt., on the ruary 23, 1965. Applicant: GREY­ way 395 as a regular route segment of Waitsfloi^ and’ 0n the °ther, Moretown, HOUND LINES, INC., 140 South Dear­ regular Route No. 238 in lieu of the pres­ S S S„,Warrin’ Fayston, born Street, Chicago, 111. Applicant’s ent segment of Route No. 238 between Fayston, Barre, South Barre, attorney: W. T. Meinhold, 371 Market said termini over unnumbered highway, 3918 NOTICES

which is herein proposed to be revoked, as a segment of Route No. 249 in lieu of northern terminus of Route No. 264 to and (c) reauthorize present alternate present segment between County Road read “South San Bernardino Junction” Route No. 245 between Linda Vista Junc­ and Otay Junction over unnumbered to avoid duplication with segment of tion and San Diego, over U.S. Highway highway herein proposed to be revoked, present Route No. 262, respectively, to 395 as a regular route segment of regular respectively to read as follows: (a) “245. read as followsr (a ) “263-A. between Route No. 238 in lieu of the present seg­ Intentionally left blank”, (b) “246. be­ Tustin Interchange and Olive Junction: ment of Route No. 238 between said ter­ tween Perris Junction and Temecula from junction U.S. Highway 101 and mini over unnumbered highway which is Junction: from Perris Junction over U.S. California Highway 55 in Tustin (Tustin herein proposed to be revoked, respec­ Highway 395 to Temecula Junction,” (c) Interchange), over California Highway tively, to read as follows: (a) “237. be­ “248. between San Diego and National 55 to junction unnumbered highway tween Anaheim and Riverside: from City: from San Diego over unnumbered (Olive Junction)”, and (b) “264. be­ Anaheim over unnumbered highway to highway (Harbor Drive) to junction In­ tween South San Bernardino and San junction California Highway 55 (Olive terstate Highway 5 (National City),” (d) Bernardino Junction: from junction Col-- Junction), thence over California High­ “249. between San Diego and the inter­ ton Avenue and U.S. Highway 395 (South way 55 to junction California Highway national boundary of the United States San B ern ardino), over U.S. Highway 395 91 (Peralta Hills Junction) , thence over and Mexico: from San Diego over un­ to junction Interstate Highway 10 (San California Highway 91 to Riverside,” and numbered highway to junction Business Bernardino Junction) ”, and return over (b) “238. between Corona and San Diego: Route U.S. Highway 101 (National City), the same routes, serving all intermediate from Corona over California Highway 71 thence over Business Route U.S. Highway points, except where otherwise specified, to junction unnumbered highway north­ 101 to junction unnumbered highway subject to the general conditions and west of Alberhill (Alberhill Junction), (Otay Junction), thence over unnum­ orders set forth on First Revised Sheet thence over unnumbered highway via bered highway via Palm City, Nestor, and No. 1A of said proposed Certificate No. Alberhill, Elsinore, and Murrieta to junc­ San Ysidro to junction Interstate High­ M C 1515 (Sub-No. 7) (formerly M C1501 tion U.S. Highway 395 northwest of way 5 (San Ysidro Junction), thence over (Sub-No. 138)). Temecula (Temecula Junction), thence Interstate Highway 5 to the international Note: The changes In operating authority over U.S. Highway 395 to junction un­ boundary at the San Ysidro Port of En­ hereinabove shown and explained are pro­ numbered highway east of Fallbrook try,” and (e) “250. between Chula Vista posed to be incorporated in the designated (Fallbrook Junction), thence over un­ Junction and Otay Junction: from revised sheet to said proposed Certificate No. numbered highway via Fallbrook to B on- junction Business Route U.S. Highway MC 1515 (Sub-No. 7) (formerly MC 1501 (Sub-No. 138)). Common control may be sall, thence over California Highway 76 101 and unnumbered highway west of Involved. to junction unnumbered highway north Chula Vista (Chula Vista Junction), over of Vista (Vista Junction), thence over unnumbered highway via Chula Vista By the Commission. unnumbered highway to Vista, thence and Otay to junction Business Route [ seal] B ertha F. Armes, over California Highway 78 to Escondido, US. Highway 101 (Otay Junction) (6) Acting Secretary. thence over U.S. Highway 395 to San Revision of California Routes Nos. 251, [F.R. Doc. 65-3001; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; Diego.” (4) Revision of California 252, and 253 on Certificate Sheet No. 47: 8:45 a.m.] Routes Nos. 242, 243, and 244 on Cer­ (a) Adopt a segment of relocated U.S. tificate Sheet No. 45: (a) Revise Routes Highway 101, also designated Interstate Nos. 242 and 243 to change name of point Highway 5 between San Diego and Na­ FOURTH SECTION APPLICATION FOR now designated as “U.S. Naval Auxiliary tional City as a segment of regular Route RELIEF Air Station” to correct designation of No. 251 in lieu of present segment of “U.S. Naval Air Station”, and (bi re­ route herein proposed to be reauthorized M arch 22,1965. authorize Route No. 244 between North as a separately described Route No. 248, Protests to the granting of an appli­ Camp Elliott Junction and South Camp (b) incidental to the relief requested in cation must be prepared in accordance Elliott Junction as a segment of regular (5) subparagraph (d ), reauthorize a seg­ with Rule 1.40 of the general rules of Route No. 238 as indicated in (3) sub- ment of present Route No. 252 between practice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within paragraph (b), supra, to read as follows: County Road Junction and Otay Junc­ 15 days from the date of publication of (a) “242. between Miramar Junction and tion (proposed) as a segment of regular this notice in the F e d e r a l R e g i s t e r . U.S. Naval Air Station: from junction Route No. 249, and (c) redescribe Route L ong- and-S hort Haul U.S. Highway 395 and unnumbered high­ No. 253 to accurately reflect the junc­ way south of Miramar (Miramar Junc­ tion named “Byer Junction” as junction F S A N o. 39633— Stone to points in WTL tion) , over unnumbered highway to U.S. of Business Route U.S. Highway 101 and Territory. Filed by Western Trunk Line Naval Air Station,” (b) “243. between Byer Way, respectively to read as fol­ Committee, Agent (No. A-2395), for U.S. Naval Air Station and La Jolla Junc­ lows: (a) “251. between San Diego and terested rail carriers. Rates on stone, tion: from U.S. Naval Air Station over San Ysidro Junction: from San Diego broken, crushed or ground, in carloa . unnumbered highway to junction U.S. over Interstate Highway 5 to junction from Cotopaxi, Howard, Parkdaie, Highway 101 east of La Jolla (La Jolla San Ysidro Boulevard south of San Pleasanton, Salida, Texas Creek, a Junction). Alternate route to be used Ysidro (San Ysidro Junction) ”, (b) “252. Wellsville, Colo., also Sheridan, Wyo., for operating convenience only, with no between Otay Junction and Vista Ave­ points in western trunkline territory. service at intermediate points,” and (c) nue Junction: from junction Main Street Grounds for relief— Market competi­ “244. intentionally left blank.” and Business Route U.S. Highway 101 tion, modified short-line distance for (5) Revision of California Routes Nos. (Otay Junction), over Business Route rrmla and crrmininST. 245, 246, 248, 249, and 250 on Certificate U.S. Highway 101 to junction Interstate Sheet No. 46: (a) Reauthorize alternate By the Commission. Highway 5 (Vista Avenue Junction)”, Route No. 245 between Linda Vista Junc­ [ seal! B ertha F. Armes, and (c) “253. between Otay and Byer tion and San Diego as a segment of Reg­ Acting Secretary. Junction: from Otay over unnumbered ular Route No. 238 as indicated in (3) highway (Byer Way) to junction Busi­ [FJEt. Doc. 65-3073; Filed, Mar. 24, 19«5- subparagraph (c ), supra, (b) change the ness Route U.S. Highway 101 (Byer Junc­ 8:48 a.m.] southern terminus of Route No. 246 from tion). Alternate route to be used for “Elsinore Junction” to “Temecula Junc­ operating convenience only, with no tion” to conform with description of [Notice 1144] service at intermediate points”. Route No. 238, (c) reauthorize a segment (7) Revision of California Routes IOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER of present Route No. 251 between San Nos. 263-A and 264 on Certificate Sheet PROCEEDINGS Diego and National City over former No. 49: (a) Authorize a new regular U.S. Highway 101 between these points M arch 22,1965. Route No. 263-A over California High­ as a separately described Route No. 248, way 55 as relocated between Tustin In­ apses of orders entered and (d) reauthorize a segment of pres­ l 212(b) of the Interstate Co terchange and Olive Junction, in lieu of Act, and rules and regilatio P ent Route No, 252 between County Road present route over former California Junction and junction of Main Street, Highway 55, herein proposed to be re­ over Business Route U.S. Highway 101, voked, and (b) technically correct the Thursday, M arch 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3919

As provided in the Commission’s spe­ Glyco Lease Service, Falfurrias, Tex., of Inc., 1900 Virginia Beach Boulevard, cial rules of practice any interested per­ certificates in Nos. MC-89453, and M C- Virginia Beach, Va., of the operating son may file a petition seeking recon­ 89453 (Sub-No. 3), issued September 19, rights claimed in No. MC-120422 (Sub- sideration of the following numbered 1940, and September 25, 1946, respec­ No. 1) under the “grandfather clause” of proceedings within 20 days from the date tively, to N. J. McLandrich, doing busi­ section 206(a)(7)(b), Interstate Com­ of publication of this notice. Pursuant ness as N. J. McLandrich Trucking Con­ merce Act, by Littleton B. Walker, Jr., to section 17(8) of the Interstate Com­ tractor, Falfurrias, Tex.,.authorizing the doing business as Virginia Beach Trans­ merce Act, the filing of such a petition transportation of: Commodities similar fer Service, 1900 Virginia Beach Boule­ will postpone the effectiye date of the to those described in the “Mercer” vard, Virginia Beach, Va., and the sub­ order in that proceeding pending its dis­ description, between points in a speci­ stitution of transferee as applicant for position. The matters relied upon by fied part of Texas. D an Felts, Post Office a certificate Of registration from this petitioners must be specified in their Box 1117, Austin, Tex., 78766, attorney Commission, corresponding to the grant petitions with particularity. for applicants. of intrastate authority to transferor is­ No. MC-FC-66891. By order of M arch No. MC-FC-67308. By order of March sued by the Virginia State Corporation 17, 1965, the Transfer Board approved 18, 1965, the Transfer Board, on recon­ Commission in No. HG-140. the transfer to W illiam M , Hackert, sideration, authorized the transfer to No. MC-FC-67598. By order of March doing business as W illiam M. Hackert— Collins Cartage Co., a corporation, Chi­ 16, 1965, the Transfer Board approved Mail, Freight and Express, Buffalo, Wyo., cago, 111., of the “claimed Grandfather- the transfer to Clyde B. Didlake, doing applicant in No. MC-97890 (Sub-No. 1), Proviso rights” described in the order of business as Clyde’s Charter Bus Service, BOR-99 filed in the name of W. W. the Commission, Operating Rights Board Glen Burnie, Md., of certificate in No. Morgareidge, Beulah Morgareidge, Exec­ No. 2, entered in the proceeding No. M C - MC-123489, issued M ay 14,1962, to Lewis utrix, doing business as W . W . M or­ 98951 (Sub-No. 1), conditionally provid­ F. Schaffer, doing business as Schaffer gareidge, Mail, Freight and Express, ing for the issuance of a certificate of Bus Service, Baltimore, Md., authorizing Buffalo, Wyo., for certificate of registra­ registration supported by certificate of the transportation of: Passengers and tion to operate in interstate or foreign public convenience and necessity No. their baggage, and express and news­ commerce authorizing operations under 8039MC issued in the name of Ben Col­ papers in the same vehicle with pas­ the former second proviso of section lins, doing business as Collins Cartage sengers, over regular routes, between 206(a)(1) of the Act, supported by W y ­ Company, Chicago, 111., and accepted and Baltimore, Md., and Littletown, Pa., serv­ oming Public Service Commission Certif­ filed under the provisions of the former ing all intermediate points; between icate No. 200, authorizing the trans­ second proviso of section 206(a) (1) au­ Eldersburg, Md., and Sykesville, Md., portation of parcels, express and other thorizing the transportation, in inter­ serving all intermediate points; and be­ property of the type that may be carried state or foreign commerce of: Commodi­ tween Baltimore, Md., and Westminister, in small vehicles, between Clearmont, ties general within a 50-mile radius of Md., as an alternate route, serving no Wyo., and Buffalo, Wyo., over U.S. H igh­ 4941 West Ferdinand Street, Chicago, HI., intermediate póints. S. Harrison Kahn, way No. 16. William C. Holland, Box to points in Illinois. Paiil J. Maguire, 111 733 Investment Building, Washington 5, 326, Buffalo, Wyo., representative for D.C., attorney for applicants. applicants. West Washington Street, Chicago, 111., No. MC-FC-67217. By order of M arch 60602, attorney for applicants. [ s e a l ] B er th a F. A r m e s, 17, 1965, the Transfer Board approved No. MC-FC-67492. By order of March Acting Secretary. the transfer to L. E. Gresham and A. E. 18, 1965, the Transfer Board approved [F.R. Doc, 65-3074; Filed, Mar. 24, 1965; Ligon, a partnership, doing business as the transfer to Virigina Beach Transfer, 8:48 a.m.l 3920 FEDERAL REGISTER

CUMULATIVE LIST OF CFR PARTS AFFECTED— MARCH The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during March.

1 CFR 7 CFR—Continued Page 14 CFR kv Appendix A ___ '______3102 P roposed R ules—Continued 3 CFR Ch. IX ------3658 25______3200 915------3883 P roclamations: 3 1 ______3370 3638 ______2639 917------3542 3639 ______;______2641 959------3662 2761, 2855, 2924, 3349, 3350, 3377, 3640 ______2643 991------3268 3421, 3515, 3758. 1003------3765 3642 ______— 2919 1013------2870 3643 ______3509 1031 --•—------— 3224 3644 ______3511 1032 ------3224 3645 ______3739 1036------3768 2702, 2762-2764, 2855, 2856, 2927, Executive Orders: 1038 ------3224 2928, 3350-3353, 3378, 3422, 3515, 1039 ------_ 3224 10729 (revoked by E O 11205)__3513 3516, 36 39-3641, 3759, 3813-3815, 11200 ______2645 1051------3224 3857-3860. 11201 ______2921 1062------3224 73------— 2764,3422,3705,3759 11202 ______3185 , 1063------3224 75— ------2928,3378,3516 11203 _ 3417 1067------3224 91------3200,3637,3705,3706 11204 _ _ 3419 1070------3224 95—— ______;______3759 11205 ______3513 1072------2805 97______2765,2772,3517 11206 . 3741 1076------2805 121— - 3200,3637 11207 ______3743 1078 __ — ______3224 207 ______2655 1079 ______3224 224 _ 3860 5 CFR 1099— ------2672 242 _ 2856 213------2649, 1103------3470 28 8 3861 2701, 2851, 3263, 3349, 3593, 3745, 1105------3470 295 - 2656.3353 3809. 1125------3603 298 _ 2779 302------3349 1131— ------3386 399 _ 3871 410______3349 1133------3606 1204 _ 3378 6 CFR 1136 ------2723 P roposed R ules : 1138------3781 39 2682, 2718.3224,3782,3783 300 ------3745 Ch. X IV ------2805 71 2682, 540------2649 2821, 2822, 2874, 2952, 2953,3224, 8 CFR 7 CFR 3225, 3356, 3390, 3391,3452-3455, 205------3200 3549, 3664, 3665, 3713,3783-3785, 212— ------3200 3820, 3821, 3884, 3885. 214— ------,------3855 73 3391. 3549.3885 9 CFR 75 _____ 2953, 301 ------2649, 2650, 2781, 3693 72,__ __ _ 9769 3225, 3391, 3549, 3666, 3714, 3785 401------2781, 2782, 3698, 3748 93______3550 99______3550 P roposed R u le s: 207 ______3662 17 ------3272 751------2852 18 ------3272,3273249______2713 10 CFR 16 CFR 8 6 2 ______3810 13 3858, 2859, 2929. 3762. 3878-3880 877______3699 17 CFR P roposed R ules : 9nn ____ 3880 907 _ .... 2923 3372 3703 2 ______2821 200------2657 908 ------2923^ 3372,3703 12 CFR IIS :::::::::::::::::::::::::::- « « 2924, 3187, 3373, 3421, 3704, 3748 240______- JfJJ 208 9696 249______— ______3312.3422,3430 912 213___------2854 274______3312 221------3812 P ropose,, R ules: 3457,3551

971 3964 545------2854 1004------3311 18 CFR 570 ______3264 141______1030 ------3187 P roposed R ules : P roposed R ules: 371g 1031 ------3188 12------3764 154— ------3715 1099------3750 543------2875 1421------2852, 3195 544— ------2876 1464------2651 545__------2876 m m 1 __ 3593 1475 _____ 9854 1484 ------2784, 3515 563------2876 Ch. XVI 9661 P roposed R ules : 13 CFR P roposed R ules: 2952 51------3716, 3719 107------2652-2654, 3635, 3856 52------3444 P roposed R ules : 55------3450 107______2683 362______3542 1 1 1 ______2890 20 CFR 2703,3207 728 ______3601 121------3273 Thursday, March 25, 1965 FEDERAL REGISTER 3921

Page 21 CFR 32 CFR— Continued 43 CFR—Continued Page ______3526 1001— _____ —— _____ — 3595 P u blic L and Orders—Continued i»______2860 1002— ______3595 3276 (revoked in part by PLO S:::::::""---— — — — — 2704 1004______- ______3595 3551)______2661 ¡21 ______2657, 1007_____ - ______— 3595 3551— — — ______2661 2704, 2945, 3207, 3353, 3354, 3434, 1016______3596 3552 ____ 2661 3435, 3528, 3594, 3641, 3707, 3815 1053______3596 3553 ______- 2661 3596 3554 ______2661 141a. 2865 1059______- ______2704 1470______3643 3555 _____ ;______2661 146- 3556 _ 2662 146a. 2865, 3642 32A CFR ____ 2945 3557______:______2662 146c. N S A (Ch. X V III)-: 3558 ___ 3267 22 CFR I N S -1 ______3881 3559 ______3439 61______.____ 3265 O P R -4 -______2793 3560 ______3439 401______3379 33 CFR ' 3561______— — 3440 3562 ______- 3440 202______— 2761,3596, 3710 24 CFR 3563 _ 3440 2Ó4______3763 200______2657 3564 ______3441 207______— ------3265,3382, 3881 203__— ______- ______— — - 2657 3565 ___ 3441 208— ______3530 25 CFR 3566 _ — 3441 Proposed Rules: 36 CFR 2950 45 CFR 251______— 3598 114______3763 P ro po sed R u l e s : 166______— ______3531 26 CFR 7______3712 1030— - —— ______— 3881 1.'...... 2841, 2843, 3208, 3322,3435 25— ______3658 47_____ 3437 38 CFR 46 CFR 275______2658 1— — ___ —— ______.v______3441 301— ______3762 3 ______„ _____ 3354,3881 8 ______— 3643 2______2798 Proposed Rules: 31 ______- ______— 3220 1______— ____ 2663, 2669, 3764, 3765 17 ______2705,3215 21 ______— 2705 32 ______s 3220 29 CFR 35—____— ______3220 40 ______3528 39 CFR 40— — ___ — ____ - 3221 41 ______2945 4_— ______1. ____ 3437 90— ______—— ______1 - 3222 670.. . ______2791 13— — ______3437 98______— ______3222 673.. . . 17— ______— _ 2659 502-______: 3267 675.. 22______— ______3763 510______— — ______3355 677.. . 54______2761 526______-v 3267 678.. . . 61______2868 P roposed R ules : Proposed Rules: 98______3215 251— — - ____ —— _____ 2681,3548 545. ______2954 111______3216 527______3392 602______112— ______— ____ 3216 603___ 132-______3216 47 CFR 141— ______3216 0— — _____ — ____ _ 2705, 3223 30 CFR 161-______— — _ 3216 1______— — 2705, 3223 i l — . . 162______3216 13— — ______3597 12... 163___ .____ — ____ 3216 43— — ______¿______— 3223 13... 168— ______3438, 3710 73— ______— 3442, 3537, 3816, 3817 14... 87_____ ——;______— 2799 P roposed R u l e s : 14a.__ 95— ______2706, 3443 16______3820 18... 97— ______2705 24— — 3820 19— P roposed R u le s: 114______3444 20 ... 1-______—— ___ — 3822 122______3444 2t._ 73— — ______3455, 3826 22... 41 CFR 74— — ^— — __ 3457 2 3 ... 1-16______2803 24. _ 3-1______3218 49 CFR 2 5 ... 9-7 ______.___ 3323 10______— ______2662 26.. 9-15______— 3219 95— — ______2712 27.. " 101-45______— 2930, 3384 170______— ______2712 176______- _____ - 3597, 3711 32.. ------43 CFR P roposed R ules : 33.. — 18______3265 71-78______3225 34.. ------2210-_-______3657, 3710 91____ 3226 35.'. 2240______3438 450____— _____ - ______2719 3 6 ... — P u b l ic L an d O rders : •*>. 229 823 (revoked by PLO 3563)— 3440 50 CFR Ch. fn_ 2588 (revoked in part by PLO 28______— ______3323 3558 and revoked in part by 32— — — ;______3711, 3752 32 CFR P L O 3562)______3267,3440 33— — ____— 2802, 2803, 3267, 3752, 3882 805 2659 (revoked in part by PLO P roposed R u le s : 835 3562)______3440 262______— 3598 Latest Edition in the sériés of . . . PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES J o h n F. Kennedy f 1963 Contains verbatim transcripts of the President’s news conferences and speeches and full texts of messages to Congress and other mate­ John F. K’cnnedv rials released by the White House during the period January 1- November 22, 1963. v Among the 478 items in the book are: special messages to the Congress on education, youth conservation, needs of the Nation’s senior citizens, and on improving the Nation’s health; radio and tele­ vision addresses to the American people on civil rights and on the nuclear test ban treaty and the tax reduction bill; joint statements with leaders of foreign governments; and the President’s final remarks at the breakfast of the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce. Also included is the text of two addresses which the President had planned to deliver on the day of his assassination; President Johnson’s proc­ —f lamation designating November 25 a national day of mourning; and remarks at the White House ceremony in which President Kennedy was posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. A valuable reference source for scholars, reporters of current affairs 1007 Pages Price: $ç.oo and the events of history, historians, librarians, and Government officials.

VOLUM ES of PUBLIC PAPERS of the PRESIDENTS currently available: Contents: HARRY S. TRUMAN • Messages to the Congress 1945_____ ------$5.50 1947______$5.25 1946_____ ------$6.00 1948______$9.75 • Public speeches 1949------$6.75 • The President’s news conferences D W IG H T D. EISENHOWER: • Radio and television reports to the 1953_____ ------$6.75 1957______$6.75 American people 1954_____------$7.25 1958______$8.25 1955_____ ------$6.75 1959______$7.00 • Remarks to informal groups 1956_____ ------$7.25 1960-61______.— $7.75 • Public letters t|gg| §| JOH N F. K E N N E D Y : 1961______$9.00 1962 — $9.00 1963------$9.00 Order from th e : Superintendent of Documents Volumes are published annually, soon after the close of each year. Government Printing Office Earlier volumes are being issued periodically, beginning with 1945. Washington, D.C. 20402