DOCSLIB.ORG

Tool Industries of the European Paleolithic: Insights Into Hominid Evolution and Shifts in Archaeological Theory and Practice from the James B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TOOL INDUSTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN PALEOLITHIC: INSIGHTS INTO HOMINID EVOLUTION AND SHIFTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL THEORY AND PRACTICE FROM THE JAMES B. BULLITT COLLECTION by Sophie K. Joseph Honors Thesis Department of Anthropology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2020 Approved: ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– R. P. Stephen Davis, PhD (Advisor) –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Laurie C. Steponaitis, PhD –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Silvia Tomášková, PhD ABSTRACT From early archaeological excavation in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries to modern conceptions of Paleolithic stone tool evolution, radiometric dating techniques and studies of paleoenvironment have revolutionized the study of relationships and divisions between these different lithic industries. In addition, there has been a shift from the formal to the functional approach when categorizing lithic industries through time. This project aims to examine how lithic industries in France changed through the Paleolithic and early Neolithic using a curated sample from Dr. James B. Bullitt’s contribution to the North Carolina Archaeological Collection. Early and contemporary archaeological literature about early stone tools are compared and connected to broad theoretical shifts in the field since the 1800s. Because many artifacts in the Collection are used as teaching aids, it is hoped that this project provides insight into the value of the Collection to the study of about Paleolithic hominid evolution. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor and thesis committee chair Dr. Davis: without his diligent guidance and investment of time, this project truly would not have been possible. Furthermore, the James B. Bullitt Collection and larger North Carolina Archeological Collection would not be in the incredibly organized and accessible state they are today without Dr. Davis’ tireless work. I would also like to thank Dr. Steponaitis for both helpful input and incredible enthusiasm regarding the utility of this thesis project for teaching purposes and advice on integrating artifact analyses. And, I wish to thank Dr. Tomášková for input and particular expertise on the theoretical debates surrounding Paleolithic archaeology. I reiterate special thanks to my entire committee, all of whom were incredibly supportive, excited, and most of all challenged me to think critically and engage with the discipline in a productive way. I would also like to thank Dr. Townsend Middleton for guidance on framing this project and navigating the beginning stages of research, writing, and grant proposals. Lorin Bruckner, Data Visualization Services Librarian, and Philip McDaniel, GIS Librarian, deserve special thanks for their help in bringing Figures 1 and 2 to life. Both my parents and my fellow students in my honors thesis cohort have been an instrumental support system, helpful editors, and a creative sounding board for ideas. And finally, funding for artifact photographs and engagement with the Collection would not have been possible without the Honors Carolina program and the Tom and Elizabeth Long Grant for Excellence in Undergraduate Honors Research. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1. Introduction................................................................................................................1 Methods............................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 2. The Lower Paleolithic Period .................................................................................11 Abbeville ............................................................................................................................11 St. Acheul Amiens .............................................................................................................15 La Micoque ........................................................................................................................18 Chapter 3. The Middle Paleolithic Period ................................................................................22 La Quina.............................................................................................................................22 Le Moustier ........................................................................................................................25 Chapter 4. The Upper Paleolithic Period .................................................................................29 Blanchard ...........................................................................................................................29 Labatut ...............................................................................................................................32 La Roche ............................................................................................................................36 La Madeleine .....................................................................................................................39 Chapter 5. The Neolithic Period ................................................................................................42 Grand Pressigny .................................................................................................................42 Chapter 6. Conclusion ................................................................................................................46 References Cited...........................................................................................................................52 Appendix A. Inventory of Artifacts from the James B. Bullitt Collection ............................60 Appendix B. Measurements and Notes on Artifacts Selected for Study ................................63 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Summary chart of time periods, tool industries, and hominid species ............................7 Figure 2. Map of sites on a political map of modern-day France ...................................................9 Figure 3. Large bifacial handaxe from Abbeville .........................................................................13 Figure 4. Large bifacial handaxe from St. Acheul Amiens ..........................................................16 Figure 5. Scraper from La Micoque ..............................................................................................21 Figure 6. Scraper from La Quina ..................................................................................................24 Figure 7. Typical Mousterian Levallois core from Le Moustier ..................................................28 Figure 8. Aurignacian blade from Abri Blanchard .......................................................................31 Figure 9. Noailles burin from Labatut ..........................................................................................33 Figure 10. Flat burin from Labatut ...............................................................................................34 Figure 11. Thin Magdalenian blade from La Roche .....................................................................38 Figure 12. Thin blade from La Madeleine ....................................................................................41 Figure 13. Long blade from Grand Pressigny ...............................................................................43 iv 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Understanding hominid evolution through the Paleolithic era has been one of the highest priorities in archaeology since the discipline’s early conception (van Andel et al. 2003; Bennett 1943; Binford 1985; Breuil 1913). Some of the most rapid and significant changes in the history of human evolution occurred during the Paleolithic, and thus understanding these changes in a spatial, temporal, and behavioral context is of paramount importance to the discipline (Bordes 1961a: 803). Within the past three decades, modern archaeology has revolutionized the study of Paleolithic hominid evolution by drawing upon techniques from the fields of paleoclimatology and isotope geochemistry to reevaluate the spatiotemporal placement of archaeological sites and understand them in the broader context of their paleoenvironment (van Andel et al. 2003: 31-33). In doing so, we now know much more about the lives of our ancestors, their culture, subsistence strategies, and interbreeding between hominid species. One of the central themes of this project is to examine how the study of Paleolithic archaeology in France has changed from archaeological excavations in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to modern conceptions of stone tool evolution. Artifacts from 10 French sites, 511 in total, were chosen for study from the James B. Bullitt Collection, part of the UNC Research Laboratories of Archaeology’s (RLA) North Carolina Archaeological Collection. In order to make connections with broader theoretical shifts within the field of archaeology, early and modern archaeological literature on stone tool evolution at these sites was compared with the artifacts present in the Bullitt Collection. The sites are discussed
Recommended publications
  • LITHIC ANALYSIS (01-070-391) Rutgers University Spring 2010

    LITHIC ANALYSIS (01-070-391) Rutgers University Spring 2010

    SYLLABUS LITHIC ANALYSIS (01-070-391) Rutgers University Spring 2010 Lecture days/hours: Thursday, 2:15-5:15 PM Lecture location: BioSci 206, Douglass Campus Instructors: Dr. J.W.K. Harris J.S. Reti, MA [email protected] [email protected] Office: BioSci, Room 203B Office: BioSci, Room 204C Office Hours: Friday 11:00 – 1:00 Office Hours: Thursday 1:00 – 3:00 COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course is an integrated course that incorporates theoretical, behavioral, and practical aspects of lithic technology. Lithic Analysis is an advanced undergraduate course in human and non-human primate stone technology. Each student is expected to already have taken an introductory course in human evolution, primatology, and/or archaeology. Lithic Analysis is a sub-discipline of archaeology. The focus is on the inferential potential of stone tools with regard to human behavior. Early human ancestors first realized the utility of sharp stone edges for butchery and other practices. Arguably, without the advent of stone tools human evolution would have taken a different path. Stone tools allowed early hominins efficient access to meat resources and provided as avenue for cognitive development and three-dimensional problem solving. This course will provide a three-fold approach to lithic analysis: 1) study of archaeological sites and behavioral change through time relative to lithic technological changes, 2) insight into the art of laboratory lithic analysis and methods employed to attain concrete, quantitative behavioral conclusions, and 3) extensive training in stone tool replication. Such training will provide students with both an appreciation for the skills of our ancestors and with personal skills that will allow for further research into replication and human behavior.
  • The Solutrean-Magdalenian Transition: a View from Iberia

    The Solutrean-Magdalenian Transition: a View from Iberia

    Quaternary International 272-273 (2012) 75e87 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint The SolutreaneMagdalenian transition: A view from Iberia J. Emili Aura a,*, Marc Tiffagom b, Jesús F. Jordá Pardo c, Elsa Duarte d, Javier Fernández de la Vega d, David Santamaria d, Marco de la Rasilla d, Margarita Vadillo e, Manuel Perez Ripoll e a University of Valencia, Prehistória i Arqueologia, Avda. Blasco Ibañez, 28, Valencia 46010, Spain b Museu de Prehistoria, Valencia, Spain c Laboratorio de Estudios Paleolíticos, UNED Madrid, Spain d Area de Prehistoria, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain e Dept. Prehistoria i Arqueologia, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain article info abstract Article history: The paper examines the Upper SolutreaneArchaic Magdalenian/Badegoulian succession on the base of Available online 18 May 2012 lithic and bone tool production, chrono-stratigraphic data and radiocarbon dates from the Cantabrian and Mediterranean regions of Iberia, mainly the areas of Asturias and Valencia (Spain). The discussion considers a reduced number of variables (characteristic stone tools, bone points and decoration tech- niques) and highlights the elements in common. The analysis concerning the transformation of lithic production at Cova del Parpalló provides new data for the Upper SolutreaneArchaic Magdalenian/ Badegoulian transition. Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction continuous incisions) at Badegoule and Le Placard. Nonetheless, all these elements are still characterized as Magdalenian. The techniques used for the manufacture of Solutrean stone The transition is not only defined by the shift from stone points points changed during the Last Glacial Maximum (hereafter LGM), to ones made of bone.
  • Blades), Side Scrapers

    Blades), Side Scrapers

    226 • PaleoAnthropology 2008 Figure 5. Tool types assigned to the Tres Ancien Paléolithique and the Lower Paleolithic. blades), side scrapers (single, double, and transverse), In Romanian archaeology, it is used as a synonym for the backed knives (naturally backed and with retouched back), Pebble Culture and is meant to designate Mode I indus- and notches/denticulates (Figure 6). tries, as can be inferred from the typology of the material (see Figure 5). Discussion A very difficult issue is learning what meaning under- tErMINoLOGY lies the term Lower Paleolithic itself. In order to clarify this This is a topic that is still very unclear for the Lower Pa- problem, one must look back a few decades, when there leolithic record of Romania. Inconsistencies regarding the was a belief that the cultures that postdate the Pebble Cul- terms are mentioned here. ture were the Abbevillian, Acheulian and Clactonian, all emerging from Pebble Culture industries. After the cul- tres Ancien Paléolithique (tAP) tural meaning of the Abbevillian and the Clactonian were This term refers, sensu Bonifay (Bonifay and Vandermeer- challenged, in Romanian archaeology the framing of this sch 1991), to industries that were prior to the emergence period became more cautious. There was no explicit shift of developed Acheulian bifaces and Levallois technology. defended in publications, but gradually the two terms fell Figure 6. Tool types assigned to the Premousterian. Lower Paleolithic of Romania • 227 out of use in defining distinct industries and became just supposed to be either Clactonian or Premousterian. Some- a typological and a technical description, respectively. At times, due to the particular morphology of the piece, ad- the same time, the existence of the Acheulian north of the ditional interpretations were made regarding the piece’s Danube was no longer claimed, but the term still was used various presumed functions, such as cutting, crushing and in classification of bifaces.
  • An Early Modern Human from the Pes¸Tera Cu Oase, Romania

    An Early Modern Human from the Pes¸Tera Cu Oase, Romania

    An early modern human from the Pes¸tera cu Oase, Romania Erik Trinkaus*†, Oana Moldovan‡,S¸ tefan Milota§, Adrian Bıˆlga˘r¶, Laurent¸iu Sarcina§, Sheela Athreyaʈ, Shara E. Bailey**, Ricardo Rodrigo††, Gherase Mircea§, Thomas Higham‡‡, Christopher Bronk Ramsey‡‡, and Johannes van der Plicht§§ *Department of Anthropology, Campus Box 1114, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130; ‡Institutul de Speologie ‘‘Emil Racovit¸a˘ ,’’ Clinicilor 5, P.O. Box 58, 3400 Cluj, Romania; §Pro Acva Grup, Strada˘Surduc 1, 1900 Timis¸oara, Romania; ¶Strada˘Decebal 1, 1500 Drobeta Turnu Severin, Romania; ʈDepartment of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843; **Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, 2110 G Street, Washington, DC 20052; ††Centro Nacional da Arqueologia Na´utica e Subaqua´tica, Instituto Portugueˆs de Arqueologia, Avenida da India 136, 1300 Lisboa, Portugal; ‡‡Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, 6 Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom; and §§Centrum voor Isotopen Onderzoek, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands Contributed by Erik Trinkaus, August 8, 2003 The 2002 discovery of a robust modern human mandible in the Pes¸tera cu Oase, southwestern Romania, provides evidence of early modern humans in the lower Danubian Corridor. Directly accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (14C)-dated to 34,000– 36,000 14C years B.P., the Oase 1 mandible is the oldest definite early modern human specimen in Europe and provides perspec- tives on the emergence and evolution of early modern humans in the northwestern Old World. The moderately long Oase 1 mandi- ble exhibits a prominent tuber symphyseos and overall proportions that place it close to earlier Upper Paleolithic European specimens.
  • The Basques of Lapurdi, Zuberoa, and Lower Navarre Their History and Their Traditions

    The Basques of Lapurdi, Zuberoa, and Lower Navarre Their History and Their Traditions

    Center for Basque Studies Basque Classics Series, No. 6 The Basques of Lapurdi, Zuberoa, and Lower Navarre Their History and Their Traditions by Philippe Veyrin Translated by Andrew Brown Center for Basque Studies University of Nevada, Reno Reno, Nevada This book was published with generous financial support obtained by the Association of Friends of the Center for Basque Studies from the Provincial Government of Bizkaia. Basque Classics Series, No. 6 Series Editors: William A. Douglass, Gregorio Monreal, and Pello Salaburu Center for Basque Studies University of Nevada, Reno Reno, Nevada 89557 http://basque.unr.edu Copyright © 2011 by the Center for Basque Studies All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Cover and series design © 2011 by Jose Luis Agote Cover illustration: Xiberoko maskaradak (Maskaradak of Zuberoa), drawing by Paul-Adolph Kaufman, 1906 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Veyrin, Philippe, 1900-1962. [Basques de Labourd, de Soule et de Basse Navarre. English] The Basques of Lapurdi, Zuberoa, and Lower Navarre : their history and their traditions / by Philippe Veyrin ; with an introduction by Sandra Ott ; translated by Andrew Brown. p. cm. Translation of: Les Basques, de Labourd, de Soule et de Basse Navarre Includes bibliographical references and index. Summary: “Classic book on the Basques of Iparralde (French Basque Country) originally published in 1942, treating Basque history and culture in the region”--Provided by publisher. ISBN 978-1-877802-99-7 (hardcover) 1. Pays Basque (France)--Description and travel. 2. Pays Basque (France)-- History. I. Title. DC611.B313V513 2011 944’.716--dc22 2011001810 Contents List of Illustrations..................................................... vii Note on Basque Orthography.........................................
  • C H a P T E R VII Comparison of Stone Age Cultures the Cultural

    C H a P T E R VII Comparison of Stone Age Cultures the Cultural

    158 CHAPTER VII Comparison of Stone Age Cultures The cultural horizons ami pleistocene sequences of the Upper Son Valley are compared with the other regions to know their positions in the development of Stone Age Cultures* However, ft must not be forgotten that the industries of various regions were more or less in­ fluenced by the local factors: the environment, geology f topography, vegetation, climate and animals; hence some vsriitions are bound to occur in them* The comparison is first made with industries within India and then with those outside India. i) Within India • Punjab Potwar The Potwar region, which lies between the Indus and Jhebm, including the Salt Range, was examined by Oe Terra and Pater son. The latter has recently published a revised 2 stuiy of the cultural horizons. 1. De Terra, H., and Paterson, T.T., 1939, Studies on the Ice Age in India and Associated Human Culture, pp.252-312 2. Paterson, T.T., and Drummond, H.J.H., 1962, Soan,the Palaeolithic of Pakistan. These scholars had successfully located six terraces (Including TD) in the Sohan Valley: "nowhere else in the Potwar is the leistocene history so well recorded as along the So&n Hiver and its tributaries.w The terraces TD and TI placed in the Second Glacial and Second Inter- glacial, respectively fall in the Middle Pleistocene, terraces ? and 3 originated in Third Glacial and Inter- glaual period. Th succeeding terrace viz., T4 has bean connected with the Fourth Glacial period. The last terrace - T5 - belongs to Post-glacLal and Holacene time. The oldest artifacts are located in the Boulder Con­ glomerate and are placed in the earliest Middle Pleisto­ cene or Lower Pleistocene.
  • Late Magdalenian Lithic Technological Organization at Lapa Do Picareiro, Central Portugal

    Late Magdalenian Lithic Technological Organization at Lapa Do Picareiro, Central Portugal

    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 Late Magdalenian lithic technological organization at Lapa do Picareiro, central Portugal. Melissa Jean Holst University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Holst, Melissa Jean, "Late Magdalenian lithic technological organization at Lapa do Picareiro, central Portugal." (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2720. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2720 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LATE MAGDALENIAN LITHIC TECHNOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION AT LAPA DO PICAREIRO, CENTRAL PORTUGAL By Melissa Jean Holst B.A., University of Louisville, 2013 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology Department of Anthropology University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky May 2017 LATE MAGDALENIAN LITHIC TECHNOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION AT LAPA DO PICAREIRO, CENTRAL PORTUGAL BY Melissa Jean Holst B.A., University of Louisville, 2013 A Thesis Approved on March 31, 2017 By the following Thesis Committee: _______________________________________ Dr. Jonathan A. Haws, Thesis Director _______________________________________ Dr. Telmo J. R. Pereira _______________________________________ Dr.
  • UNE NOUVELLE REPRÉSENTATION FÉMININE À La Madeleine (Tursac, Dordogne)

    UNE NOUVELLE REPRÉSENTATION FÉMININE À La Madeleine (Tursac, Dordogne)

    PALEO – N° 21 – 2009-2010 – Pages 127 à 134 UNE NOUVELLE REPRÉSENTATION FÉMININE à La Madeleine (Tursac, Dordogne) Jean-Pierre DUHARD (1) Résumé : L’auteur présente une figure féminine sculptée sur bois de renne, provenant du Magdalénien IV du grand abri de La Madeleine en Dordogne. Elle vient compléter le petit corpus de figurations humaines de ce site, par ailleurs riche en œuvres d’art. Le corps est représenté en vue frontale et se résume à un tronc et à un pelvis, avec indication des racines crurales et du triangle pubo-génital. Dans sa morphologie, il n’est pas sans rappeler la figure gravée de Lespugue et la figure en ronde bosse de Laugerie-Basse et il illustre la tendance au schématisme de ces figures féminines mobilières magdaléniennes. Mots-clés : Paléolithique, Magdalénien, art mobilier, sculpture, figure féminine, La Madeleine. Key-words: Palaeolithic, Magdalenian, mobiliar art, sculpture, female figure, Madeleine. Abridged english version New female representation in La Madeleine (Tursac, Dordogne). The author presents a segment of cortical reindeer antler, elongated and of semi-circular section, carrying a female carved figure from the Magdalenian IV of the large shelter of Madeleine in Dordogne (France) and stored in the Musée national de préhistoire. Discovered by D. Peyrony during his excavations between 1910 and 1913, it had been described in the monography of E. Capitan and D. Peyrony (1928) as a blade dagger (fig. 1). Without prejudice to the use of this object, it provides an unambiguous but schematic representation of a woman (fig. 2, 3, 4, 5), Her body is represented in frontal view, and comes down to the trunk and pelvis, with indication of the starting point of the thighs and the pubogenital triangle.
  • Anthropology

    Anthropology

    CALIFOR!:HA STATE UNIVERSI'fY, NO:R'l'HRIDGE 'l'HE EVOLUTIONARY SCHENES 0!.'' NEANDER.THAL A thesis su~nitted in partial satisfaction of tl:e requirements for the degree of Naste.r of A.rts Anthropology by Sharon Stacey Klein The Thesis of Sharon Stacey Klein is approved: Dr·,~ Nike West. - Dr. Bruce Gelvin, Chair California s·tate University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ·There are many people I would like to thank. Firs·t, the members of my corr.mi ttee who gave me their guidance and suggestions. Second, rny family and friends who supported me through this endea7cr and listened to my constant complaining. Third, the people in my office who allowed me to use my time to complete ·this project. Specifically, I appreciate the proof-reading done by my mother and the French translations done by Mary Riedel. ii.i TABLE OF' CONTENTS PAGE PRELIMINA:H.Y MATEIUALS : Al")stra-:-:t vi CHAP'I'ERS: I. Introduction 1 II. Methodology and Materials 4 III. Classification of Neanderthals 11 Species versus Subspecies Definitions of Neanderthals 16 V. The Pre-sapiens Hypothesis .i9 VI. The Unilinear Hypothesis 26 Horphological Evidence Transi tiona.l Sp.. ::;:cimens T'ool Complexes VII. The Pre-Neanderthal Hypothesis 58 Morphological Evidence Spectrum Hypothesis "Classic'1 Neanderthal's Adaptations Transitional Evidence Tool Complexes VIII. Sumnary and Conclusion 90 Heferences Cited 100 1. G~<ological and A.rchaeoloqical 5 Subdivisions of the P1eistoce!1e 2. The Polyphyletic Hypothesis 17 3. The Pre-sapiens Hypothesis 20 4. The UnilinPar Hypothesis 27 iv FIGUHES: P.Z\GE 5. Size Comparisons of Neanderthal 34 and Australian Aborigine Teeth 6.
  • Microlith® T Stir-In Pigment Preparations for Solvent-Based Coatings with High Transparency

    Microlith® T Stir-In Pigment Preparations for Solvent-Based Coatings with High Transparency

    Microlith® T Stir-in pigment preparations for solvent-based coatings with high transparency Key features Wood coating with ® ▪ Organic pigments Microlith T predispersed in a modified ▪ Easily incorporated into a rosin ester resin variety of solvents with ▪ Dry powder, low dust dissolvers or high-shear processing mixers without preliminary milling ▪ Small particle size and extremely narrow particle size ▪ Suitable for wood stains, distribution glazes and lacquers ▪ Excellent color strength, ▪ Combination with effect gloss, light fastness and pigments offers endless transparency, as well as styling opportunities outstanding dispersion Microlith® T Ideal for solvent-based coating systems Pigment Fastness to light Resistance to overlacquering Colour Product name Chemical type content Index Oak with Oak without Poly- Acid Nitro- [%] NC [3%]* NC [3%]* urethane curing cellulose Microlith® Black 0066 T P.Bk.7 Carbon black 33 7 7 5 5 5 Microlith® Yellow 2040 T P.Y.110 Isoindolinone 33 7 7 5 5 5 Microlith® Brown 3001 T P.BR.23 Azo condensation 30 7 7 5 5 5 Microlith® Red 3890 T P.R.144 Azo condensation 33 6 6 5 5 5 Microlith® Blue 7080 T P.B.15:3 Cu-phthalocyanine (β) 34 7 7 5 5 5 Cu-phthalocyanine Microlith® Green 8750 T P.G.7 33 7 7 5 5 5 halogenated * Concentration of the pigment preparation in the applied stain Guidelines for incorporation An important factor in the incorporation of Microlith® T pigment preparations into surface coatings is the solubility of the carrier resin in the various types of solvents normally used. Microlith® T pigment preparations have: ▪ very good dispersibility in aromatic hydrocarbons and chlorinated hydrocarbons ▪ good dispersibility in esters, ketones and glycol ethers ▪ limited dispersibility in aliphatic hydrocarbons and higher alcohols ▪ no dispersibility in water, methanol and ethanol Compatibility with solvents and binders Formulation guidelines for the preparation The carrier resin in Microlith® T pigment preparations has of a wood stain good compatibility with many binders and additives.
  • The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa

    The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa

    Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University THE AURIGNACIAN VIEWED FROM AFRICA Christian A. TRYON Introduction 20 The African archeological record of 43-28 ka as a comparison 21 A - The Aurignacian has no direct equivalent in Africa 21 B - Archaic hominins persist in Africa through much of the Late Pleistocene 24 C - High modification symbolic artifacts in Africa and Eurasia 24 Conclusions 26 Acknowledgements 26 References cited 27 To cite this article Tryon C. A. , 2015 - The Aurignacian Viewed from Africa, in White R., Bourrillon R. (eds.) with the collaboration of Bon F., Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe, Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University, P@lethnology, 7, 19-33. http://www.palethnologie.org 19 P@lethnology | 2015 | 19-33 Aurignacian Genius: Art, Technology and Society of the First Modern Humans in Europe Proceedings of the International Symposium, April 08-10 2013, New York University THE AURIGNACIAN VIEWED FROM AFRICA Christian A. TRYON Abstract The Aurignacian technocomplex in Eurasia, dated to ~43-28 ka, has no direct archeological taxonomic equivalent in Africa during the same time interval, which may reflect differences in inter-group communication or differences in archeological definitions currently in use. Extinct hominin taxa are present in both Eurasia and Africa during this interval, but the African archeological record has played little role in discussions of the demographic expansion of Homo sapiens, unlike the Aurignacian. Sites in Eurasia and Africa by 42 ka show the earliest examples of personal ornaments that result from extensive modification of raw materials, a greater investment of time that may reflect increased their use in increasingly diverse and complex social networks.
  • Belief, Ritual, and the Evolution of Religion

    Belief, Ritual, and the Evolution of Religion

    Belief, Ritual, and the Evolution of Religion Oxford Handbooks Online Belief, Ritual, and the Evolution of Religion Matt J. Rossano and Benjamin Vandewalle The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Religion Edited by James R. Liddle and Todd K. Shackelford Subject: Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Online Publication Date: Oct 2016 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199397747.013.8 Abstract and Keywords This chapter outlines an evolutionary scenario for the emergence of religion. From cognitive science, four mental prerequisites of religious cognition are discussed: (1) hyperactive agency detection, (2) theory of mind, (3) imagination, and (4) altered states of consciousness. Evidence for these prerequisites in nonhuman primates suggests their presence in our early hominin ancestors. From comparative psychology, evidence of ritual behavior in nonhuman primates and other species is reviewed. Archeological evidence of ritual behavior is also discussed. Collectively, these data indicate that the first step toward religion was an elaboration of primate social rituals to include group synchronized activities such as dancing, chanting, and singing. Control of fire, pigment use, and increasing brain size would have intensified group synchronized rituals over time, which, in the context of increased intergroup interactions, eventually led to the first evidence of supernatural ritual at about 70,000 years before present. Keywords: agency detection, burial, cave art, costly signals, evolution, religion, ritual, synchronized movement, theory of mind Anyone interested in probing the evolutionary origins of religion faces a formidable challenge: Belief is central to religion, and belief does not fossilize in the archeological record. Looking at a half-million-year-old Acheulean hand axe may tell us something about the maker’s technical skills, diet, hunting practices, and lifestyle, but very little about his or her beliefs—let alone the supernatural beliefs inherent to most religions.