The Development of European Criminal Procedure Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Development of European Criminal Procedure Law eucrim ISSUE / ÉDITION / AUSGABE 1–2 / 2009 THE EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW ASSOCIATIONS‘ FORUM SUCCESSOR TO AGON Focus: The Development of European Criminal Procedure Law Dossier particulier: Le développement du droit de la procédure pénale européen Schwerpunktthema: Die Entwicklung des europäischen Strafprozessrechts Rules on the Application of ne bis in idem in the EU Dr. Katalin Ligeti Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in Criminal Matters with Regard to Probation Measures and Alternative Sanctions Hanna Kuczyńska Vers la mort annoncée du juge d’instruction en France Elisabeth Schneider The Constitution says yes [but …] to the Lisbon Treaty Dr. Marianne Wade 1–2 / 2009 ISSUE / ÉDITION / AUSGABE Contents News* Articles European Union Cooperation The Development of European 14 Customs Cooperation Criminal Procedure Law Foundations 15 Judicial Cooperation 2 Community Powers in Criminal 17 European Arrest Warrant Matters – Data Retention 19 European Supervision Order 37 Rules on the Application of ne bis in idem 3 Community Powers in Criminal 19 Criminal Records in the EU Matters – Data Bases 20 E-Justice Dr. Katalin Ligeti 3 Schengen 23 Law Enforcement Cooperation 4 Legislation 43 Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in Criminal Matters with Regard to Probation Institutions Council of Europe Measures and Alternative Sanctions 5 OLAF Hanna Kuczyńska 5 Europol Foundations 6 Eurojust 25 60th Anniversary of Council 49 Vers la mort annoncée du juge d’instruction of Europe en France Specific Areas of Crime/ 26 Relations between the Council Elisabeth Schneider Substantive Criminal Law of Europe and the European Union 7 Counterfeiting & Piracy 27 European Court of Human Rights 57 The Constitution says yes [but …] 7 Organised Crime 29 Human Rights and Legal Affairs to the Lisbon Treaty 8 Environmental Crime Dr. Marianne Wade 8 Illegal Employment Specific Areas of Crime 30 Corruption Procedural Criminal Law 31 Money Laundering Imprint 9 Procedural Safeguards 33 Cybercrime 10 Data Protection 11 Ne bis in idem Procedural Criminal Law 13 Victim Protection 14 Freezing of Assets Legislation * News contain internet links referring to more detailed information. These links can be easily accessed either by clicking on the respective ID-number of the desired link in the online-journal or – for print version readers – by accessing our webpage www.mpicc.de/eucrim/search.php and then entering the ID-number of the link in the search form. Editorial Dear Readers, I am delighted to contribute the editorial to this new issue of of this youth, such a decision was not eucrim, which covers different aspects of European criminal taken when the European Arrest War- procedural law and judicial cooperation within the European rant was issued. The Polish Supreme Union. Cooperation in criminal matters among the Member Court held that, despite the lack of any States tackles various questions of a different nature, spanning instigated criminal proceedings, the legal, political, theoretical, and practical issues. In contrary to warrant could be executed, provided the practice in civil matters, cooperation in criminal matters that the surrender of the accused is for proves to be more difficult, mainly due to the “traditional” the purpose of conducting criminal approach linked with the sovereignty of each State in respect non-juvenile proceedings. of its criminal legislation. However, ideas that have been adopted and put into practice in the European Communities The second case in 2009 was even and European Union over the past few decades force us to look more difficult, in particular due to dif- at the issue of sovereignty in criminal law in a new way. ferent approaches adopted by different EU Member States. It concerned the Prof. Lech K. Paprzycki Although unintended, the free movement of persons and goods procedure of returning a sentenced in the European Community unfortunately also allows crimi- offender to the executing Member State for the purpose of nals to move more easily and freely across the borders of the serving the sentence passed in the issuing Member State, as European Union Member States and to set up or move their set forth in Article 5.3 of the Framework Decision on the Eu- criminal enterprises wherever and whenever it proves most ef- ropean Arrest Warrant. The Supreme Court held that Article fective. Efforts must be undertaken on the part of each Mem- 607s § 4 of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure excludes ber State, not only individually but also collectively, in order exequatur procedures, as set forth in the 1983 Council of to effectively safeguard the underlying policies of the EU and Europe Convention on the transfer of sentenced persons and fight cross-border crime. in Polish legislation. The process of achieving these aims can be divided into three The decisions in these two cases exemplify how Poland gave levels: European legislation, national legislation, and practi- the idea of mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal cal cooperation. The first two levels assume political good matters its widest possible meaning. The fundamental pillars will. The third one rests on good faith and mutual trust among of both decisions are based on the belief and trust that Polish or the Member States. Each level is as important as the other, any other EU Member State’s cases abroad will be treated with although the efficacy of enacted laws will always be measured the same broad approach to the idea of mutual recognition. in practice. For this reason, despite its legislative origins, the level and standard of cooperation among EU Member States in On balance, the philosophy of the traditional approach to sover- criminal matters will always rest with judges, prosecutors, the eignty in criminal law must be reviewed in order to effectively police, and other law enforcement officers. fight the increasing number of EU-wide crimes. Maintaining and developing the EU as an area of freedom, security and In this context, the implications of the EU approach to the in- justice depends on good faith among the Member States. The terpretation of national legislation can never be underestimat- phrase “area of freedom, security and justice” means nothing ed. I would like to draw your attention to two cases relating if not supplemented with “mutual trust”. This applies equally to the European Arrest Warrant that were heard by the Polish to all aspects of judicial cooperation in criminal matters. Supreme Court. The first case in 2006 concerned a Polish na- tional sought by Belgian authorities under a charge of murder. He was still a juvenile according to Belgian law and, although Professor Lech K. Paprzycki the Belgian legislation on juveniles allowed a category of ju- President of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland, veniles to be tried as adults under the criminal law, in respect Criminal Law Chamber eucrim 1–2 / 2009 | 1 News Actualités / Kurzmeldungen reaching interference may be justified on economic grounds. In its findings, the Court first of all noted that the action brought by Ireland relates solely to the choice of legal basis and not to any possible infringement of fundamental rights arising from inter- European Union ference with the exercise of the right to Reported by Sabrina Staats* and Thomas Wahl** privacy contained in Directive 2006/24/ EC. As a result, requests from the Euro- pean Parliament and NGOs to the Court other provision of the EC Treaty would to clear up violations of human rights by Foundations have been capable of providing an ap- the data retention Directive were thwart- propriate legal basis for the Directive ed (cf. eucrim 1-2/2008, pp. 2-3). Community Powers in Criminal since the predominant objective of the Regarding the Irish arguments on Matters – Data Retention Directive is to facilitate the investi- the legal basis, the Court found that the gation, detection, and prosecution of evidence submitted to the Court showed ECJ: Data Retention Directive Complies crime, including terrorism. The provi- that the national measures regarding With EC Law sions of Directive 2006/24/EC would data retention differed substantially, On 10 February 2009, the ECJ decided not address defects in the internal mar- particularly in respect of the nature of on the Irish action seeking the annul- ket. Therefore, the only legal basis, on the data retained and the periods of data ment of Directive 2006/24/EC on the re- which the measures contained in Direc- retention. Also, the Court found that the tention of data generated or processed in tive 2006/24/EC could validly be based, obligations relating to data retention connection with the provision of public- would be Title VI of the EU Treaty, in have significant economic implications ly available electronic communications particular Arts. 30 TEU, 31(1) TEU and for service providers in so far as they services or that of public communica- 34(2)(b) TEU. The obligations designed may involve substantial investment and tions networks. to ensure that data are available for the operating costs. Thus, the differences Ireland claimed that the Court should investigation, detection, and prosecution between the national rules adopted on annul Directive 2006/24/EC on the of criminal offences would fall within data retention were liable to have a di- grounds that it was not adopted on an an area that may only be the subject of rect impact on the functioning of the appropriate legal basis. a measure based on Title VI of the EU internal market. In the Court’s opinion, In this long-awaited decision
Recommended publications
  • Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council
    EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2010 COM(2010)385 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Overview of information management in the area of freedom, security and justice EN EN COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Overview of information management in the area of freedom, security and justice 1. INTRODUCTION The European Union has come a long way since the leaders of five European countries agreed in Schengen in 1985 to abolish controls at their common borders. Their agreement gave rise in 1990 to the Schengen Convention, which contained the seeds of many of today’s information management policies. The abolition of internal border checks has spurred the development of a whole range of measures at external frontiers, mainly concerning the issuing of visas, the coordination of asylum and immigration policies and the strengthening of police, judicial and customs cooperation in the fight against cross-border crime. Neither the Schengen area nor the EU internal market could function today without cross-border data exchange. The terrorist attacks in the United States in 2001, as well as the bombings in Madrid and London in 2004 and 2005, triggered another dynamic in the development of Europe’s information management policies. In 2006, the Council and the European Parliament adopted the Data Retention Directive to enable national authorities to combat serious crime by retaining telecommunication traffic and location data.1 The Council then took up the Swedish initiative to simplify the cross-border exchange of information in criminal investigations and intelligence operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis in the Eurozone Pdf Free Download
    CRISIS IN THE EUROZONE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Costas Lapavitsas | 268 pages | 09 Nov 2012 | Verso Books | 9781844679690 | English | London, United Kingdom Crisis in the Eurozone PDF Book For example, a crisis in one country could force eurozone banks to sell that nation's debt, leaving domestic banks unable to cope. The European Central Bank is being a watchdog here and Banks in Bulgaria have been given time to create additional capital buffers till April Retrieved 11 July Retrieved 11 February Archived from the original on 4 December Comparative Political Studies. As of January , a group of 10 central and eastern European banks had already asked for a bailout. Federal Union. The major disagreements and clashes started Consequently, Greece was "punished" by the markets which increased borrowing rates, making it impossible for the country to finance its debt since early The Lisbon Council. The Balance uses cookies to provide you with a great user experience. Archived from the original PDF on 9 February In mid, due to successful fiscal consolidation and implementation of structural reforms in the countries being most at risk and various policy measures taken by EU leaders and the ECB see below , financial stability in the eurozone has improved significantly and interest rates have steadily fallen. In the idea was picked up by the European Central Bank. The 7-point plan followed an intergovernmental treaty approved on December 9, , where EU leaders agreed to create a fiscal unity parallel to the monetary union that already exists. Advanced Manufacturing Clusters in various nations will greatly help, but understanding of global-age expansion of value offerings with fine production is a new art and commercialization to nations a new science.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Politics and Governance Open Access Journal | ISSN: 2183-2463 Volume 7, Issue 3 (2019) OutOut ofof thethe Shadows,Shadows, IntoInto thethe Limelight:Limelight: ParliamentsParliaments andand PoliticisationPoliticisation Editors Christine Neuhold and Guri Rosén Politics and Governance, 2019, Volume 7, Issue 3 Out of the Shadows, Into the Limelight: Parliaments and Politicisation Published by Cogitatio Press Rua Fialho de Almeida 14, 2º Esq., 1070-129 Lisbon Portugal Academic Editors Christine Neuhold (Maastricht University, The Netherlands) Guri Rosén (University of Oslo, Norway) Available online at: www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance This issue is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). Articles may be reproduced provided that credit is given to the original andPolitics and Governance is acknowledged as the original venue of publication. Table of Contents Introduction to “Out of the Shadows, Into the Limelight: Parliaments and Politicisation” Christine Neuhold and Guri Rosén 220–226 Conceptualizing the Parliamentarization and Politicization of European Policies Niels Gheyle 227–236 The European Parliament and the Layered Politicization of the External Dimension of the Common Fisheries Policy Hubert Zimmermann 237–247 Eurosceptics into the Limelight? Eurosceptic Parliamentary Actors and Media Bias in EU Affairs Katrin Auel 248–265 Proving Their Worth? The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Members of the European Parliament Guri Rosén 266–278 Brexit under Scrutiny in
    [Show full text]
  • Departure from the Schengen Agreement Macroeconomic Impacts on Germany and the Countries of the European Union
    GED Study Departure from the Schengen Agreement Macroeconomic impacts on Germany and the countries of the European Union GED Study Departure from the Schengen Agreement Macroeconomic impacts on Germany and the countries of the European Union Authors Dr. Michael Böhmer, Jan Limbers, Ante Pivac, Heidrun Weinelt Table of contents 1 Background Information 6 2 Methodological approach 7 3 Results 9 4 Further costs of departure from the Schengen Agreement 13 Further economic impact 13 Political impact 14 Social significance 14 5 Conclusion 15 Literature 16 Imprint 18 5 1 Background Information The Schengen Agreement entered into force in 1995 and of checks at EU internal borders, on Germany and other EU today it is comprised of 26 states. This includes all European countries, as well as for the European Union as a whole. The Union members with the exception of the United Kingdom, evaluation period extends to the year 2025. Ireland, Romania, Bulgaria, Cyprus and Croatia, as well as the non-EU countries of Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. The agreement provides for the abolition of the requirement to check persons at internal borders within the Schengen area. The Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement also regulates the standardisation of entry and residency requirements, as well as, the issuing of visas for the entire Schengen area. At the time, police and judicial cooperation measures were also agreed upon, in addition to asylum provisions. In the wake of sharply rising refugee movements into Europe, a partial restoration of border controls has been implemented. European Union countries have seen a significant increase in asylum seekers.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Guide Europe on the Internet
    Information Guide Europe on the Internet A selection of useful websites, databases and documents for information on the European Union and the wider Europe Ian Thomson Director, Cardiff EDC Latest revision: August 2017 © Cardiff EDC Europe on the Internet Contents • Searching for European information • Legislative, judicial and policy-making information • Keeping up-to-date • Information on EU policies and countries • Grants and loans – Statistics • Contact information • Terminological, linguistic and translation information In addition to textual hyperlinks throughout this guide, many of the images are also hyperlinks to further information Europe on the Internet. © Ian Thomson, Cardiff EDC, August 2017 Europe on the Internet Searching for European Information Europe on the Internet. © Ian Thomson, Cardiff EDC, August 2017 Searching for European information The EU’s own search engine to find information from EU Institutions & Agencies published on EUROPA, the EU’s portal [EUROPA Search does not find information in EUR-Lex] The European Journalism Centre set up this Search Europa service, which uses the functionality of Google to search the EUROPA portal [Includes results from EUR-Lex] FIND-eR (Find Electronic Resources) will help you find EU publications, academic books, journal articles, etc. on topics of interest to the EU [Offers hyperlinks to full text of sources if freely available, or via use of a Link-Resolver] [Formerly known as ECLAS] EU Law and Publications: Use the Search Centre to search for EU documents [EU law – EUR-Lex] and EU publications [EU Bookshop] + EU websites and Summaries of EU Legislation EU Bookshop: from here you can buy printed copies or freely download electronic copies of EU publications.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Member State Constitutional Identity: a Comparison of Germany and the Netherlands As Polar Opposites
    EU Member State Constitutional Identity: A Comparison of Germany and the Netherlands as Polar Opposites Gerhard van der Schyff* Abstract 167 I. Setting the Scene 168 II. Constitutional Identity Clarified 168 III. German Constitutional Identity Explored 170 1. Affirming the “Total” Constitution 170 2. Enter State-Based Democracy 172 3. Emphasizing National Sovereignty 173 IV. Dutch Constitutional Identity Explored 176 1. A “Modest” Constitution 176 2. Emphasis on Democracy 178 3. An “Open” Constitution 181 V. Germany and the Netherlands Evaluated 182 VI. On “Total” and “Modest” Constitutions 190 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to compare, in the light of European integra- tion, the concept of constitutional identity as it applies in Germany and the Netherlands as two EU Member States. Comparing Germany and the Netherlands not only allows for these polar opposites to be defined, but also evaluated. The benefits and drawbacks of expressing national constitu- tional identity will be considered, as well as ideas developed on how the concept is to be approached in the context of European integration. * Associate Professor, Department of Public Law, Jurisprudence and Legal History at the Law School of Tilburg University in the Netherlands. This contribution was written as part of the author’s research stay as a Humboldt Fellow in 2015 at the Chair for Public and Euro- pean Law of Professor Christian Calliess at the Law Faculty of the Free University of Berlin in Germany. All views expressed are those of the author. ZaöRV 76 (2016), 167-191 http://www.zaoerv.de © 2016, Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 168 van der Schyff I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dublin Regulation
    1 The Dublin Regulation → Analysis of the Dublin System, perceived to cause a disproportionate burden to the expense of the external border countries of the EU and the reason for its continuous implementation despite persisting criticism Author: Laura Helena R. Suy Thesis Supervisor: Bjørn Møller Global Refugee Studies Aalborg Universitet København (AAU-Cph) 10th Semester, Master Thesis Spring 2014 2 List of Contents Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Abbreviation List ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Methodology & Limitations .................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 1: History & Content of the Dublin System .............................................................................. 9 1.1. The Dublin System: Content ............................................................................................................. 9 1.1.1. The Dublin Convention (1990/1997) .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JRC Eurovoc Indexer
    Published on EU Science Hub (https://ec.europa.eu/jrc) Home > Language Technology Resources > JRC Eurovoc Indexer JRC Eurovoc Indexer - JEX Introduction The EuroVoc Thesaurus JEX usage conditions Download JEX More information on JEX Acknowledgements Introduction Multilingual Eurovoc thesaurus descriptors are used by a large number of European Parliaments and Documentation Centres to manually index their large document collections. The assigned descriptors are then used to search and retrieve documents in the collection and to summarise the document contents for the users. view details As Eurovoc descriptors exist in one-to-one translations in almost thirty languages, they can be displayed in a language other than the text language and give users cross-lingual access to the information contained in each document. At the same time, EuroVoc is an ideal means to search in the user's language and to retrieve documents in other languages. The European Commission's (EC) Joint Research Centre (JRC) has developed - and makes available - software that automatically assigns EuroVoc descriptors to documents in currently 22 languages. The system uses statistical Machine Learning methods that learn the multi-label categorisation rules from previously manually indexed documents. The method used can be described as profile- based category ranking. This software, called JRC EuroVoc Indexer, or short JEX, has been trained for 22 languages and is available for download from this site. The software allows users to re-train the software on their own data, even using their own, alternative classification systems. The EuroVoc Thesaurus The EuroVoc thesaurus was developed by the European Parliament (EP), in collaboration with the EU Publications Office (OP) and several national organisations for the indexing (cataloguing / classification / categorisation) of document collections in several languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the Present and Future of the European Union, Between the Urgent Need for Democracy and Differentiated Integration
    Chapter 1 The present and future of the European Union, between the urgent need for democracy and differentiated integration Mario Telò Introduction The European Union has experienced an unprecedented multi-dimensional and prolonged crisis, a crisis which cannot be understood in isolation from the international context, with major global economic changes to the detriment of the West. Opinions differ as to the overall outcome of the European policies adopted in recent years to tackle the crisis: these policies saved the single currency and allowed for moderate growth, but, combined with many other factors, they exacerbated the crisis of legitimacy. This explains the wave of anti-European sentiment in several Member States and the real danger that the European project will collapse completely. This chapter analyses the contradictory trends at play and examines more closely how to find a way out of this crisis – a way which must be built around the crucial role of the trade union movement, both in tackling Euroscepticism and in relaunching the EU. This drive to strengthen and enhance democracy in the euro area, and to create a stronger European pillar of social rights, will not be successful without new political momentum for the EU led by the most pro-European countries. The argument put forward in this chapter is that this new European project will once again only be possible using a method of differentiated integration. This paper starts with two sections juxtaposing two contradictory sets of data. On the one hand, we see the social and institutional achievements of the past 60 years: despite everything, the EU is the only tool available to the trade union movement which provides any hope of taming and mitigating globalisation (Section 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union: Questions and Answers
    The European Union: Questions and Answers Updated October 27, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS21372 SUMMARY RS21372 The European Union: Questions and Answers October 27, 2020 The European Union (EU) is a political and economic partnership that represents a unique form of cooperation among sovereign countries. The EU is the latest stage in a process of integration Kristin Archick begun after World War II, initially by six Western European countries, to foster interdependence Specialist in European and make another war in Europe unthinkable. The EU currently consists of 27 member states, Affairs including most of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, and has helped to promote peace, stability, and economic prosperity throughout the European continent. How the EU Works The EU has been built through a series of binding treaties. Over the years, EU member states have sought to harmonize laws and adopt common policies on an increasing number of economic, social, and political issues. EU member states share a customs union; a single market in which capital, goods, services, and people move freely; a common trade policy; and a common agricultural policy. Nineteen EU member states use a common currency (the euro), and 22 member states participate in the Schengen area of free movement in which internal border controls have been eliminated. In addition, the EU has been developing a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), which includes a Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP), and pursuing cooperation in the area of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) to forge common internal security measures. Member states work together through several EU institutions to set policy and to promote their collective interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain, Ireland and Schengen: Time for a Smarter Bargain on Visas Michael Emerson No
    Britain, Ireland and Schengen: Time for a smarter bargain on visas Michael Emerson No. 249, August 2011 Given Britain’s desire to maintain its own border controls, it will not join the EU’s passport-free ‘Schengen’ area in the foreseeable future. Ireland also has to stay out because it shares a common travel area with the UK. But there is now mounting evidence that this situation hurts tourism and businesses in Britain and Ireland. Non- European travellers can move freely between Schengen countries with a single visa, and many skip the further hassle of getting visas to visit Britain or Ireland. Already the Schengen area has an agreement to facilitate Chinese group tourism, which is growing fast, and from which the UK and Ireland are excluded. This problem could be overcome if Britain, Ireland and the Schengen countries would agree on ‘mutual recognition’ of the visas they issue, without the UK or Ireland having to scrap their border controls. or the present UK government, full A case of simple economics for Britain accession to the Schengen area, a passport- and Ireland free travel area covering most of Europe, is F For many people, the cost and hassle of obtaining a red line that it will not cross. Ireland shares a common travel area and land border with the UK visas for business purposes or to go on holiday and is also bound by this decision. However, it is act as a deterrent. One of the achievements of the becoming increasingly clear that the UK, along EU internal market, with free movement of with Ireland, is suffering serious economic and goods, services, capital and people, is that visitors reputational costs as a result of its separate visa from the rest of the world view the Union as a and border management policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Language Processing Pipeline to Annotate Bulgarian Legislative Data
    Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), pages 6988–6994 Marseille, 11–16 May 2020 c European Language Resources Association (ELRA), licensed under CC-BY-NC Natural Language Processing Pipeline to Annotate Bulgarian Legislative Data Svetla Koeva, Nikola Obreshkov, Martin Yalamov Institute for Bulgarian Language "Prof. Lyubomir Andreychin" Bulgarian Academy of Sciences 52 Shipchenski prohod Blvd., Bldg. 17, Sofia 1113 {svetla, nikola, martin}@dcl.bas.bg Abstract The paper presents the Bulgarian MARCELL corpus, part of a recently developed multilingual corpus representing the national legislation in seven European countries and the NLP pipeline that turns the web crawled data into structured, linguistically annotated dataset. The Bulgarian data is web crawled, extracted from the original HTML format, filtered by document type, tokenised, sentence split, tagged and lemmatised with a fine-grained version of the Bulgarian Language Processing Chain, dependency parsed with NLP- Cube, annotated with named entities (persons, locations, organisations and others), noun phrases, IATE terms and EuroVoc descriptors. An orchestrator process has been developed to control the NLP pipeline performing an end-to-end data processing and annotation starting from the documents identification and ending in the generation of statistical reports. The Bulgarian MARCELL corpus consists of 25,283 documents (at the beginning of November 2019), which are classified into eleven types. Keywords: NLP pipeline, legislative corpus, Bulgarian language ● Domain-specific adaptation: the NLP pipeline 1. Introduction modules are tuned to annotate legal domain The paper presents the Bulgarian MARCELL corpus, part documents. of a recently developed multilingual corpus representing ● Multiword coverage: Multiwords are handled at the national legislation in seven European countries and the levels of annotation.
    [Show full text]