How Porous Are the Walls That Separate Us?: Transformative Service-Learning, Women’S Incarceration, and the Unsettled Self
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Faculty Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2012 How Porous are the Walls that Separate Us?: Transformative Service-Learning, Women’s Incarceration, and the Unsettled Self Coralynn V. Davis Bucknell University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/fac_journ Part of the Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons, Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Community-Based Learning Commons, Criminology Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Epistemology Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, Service Learning Commons, Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, Social Psychology and Interaction Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Coralynn V., and Carol Wayne White. 2012. "How Porous are the Walls that Separate Us? Feminist Pedagogy, Incarceration, and Disseminating Knowledge." Humboldt Journal of Social Relations (special issue on Social Justice Action, Teaching and Research) 34:85-104. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations Issue 34 - Social Justice Action, Teaching, and Research Co-Editors: Jennifer L. Eichstedt Mary Virnoche Co-Managing Editors: Laura Dawson Jennifer Miles Michael P. Weiss Humboldt Journal Of Social Relations Issue 34 ■ 2012 Social Justice Action, Teaching, and Research Contents 1 Introduction Jennifer Miles and Michael P. Weiss, Co-Managing Editors 2 The Art of Social Justice Jennifer Miles and Laura Dawson, Co-Managing Editors 9 Social Justice, Action, and Teaching: The Legacies of Eric Rofes Christina Accomando 14 Afterward: Eric Rofes’ Legacy at Humboldt State University Michael P. Weiss, Co-Managing Editor 15 Designing ‘Queer’ Across Cultures: Disrupting the Consumption of Diversity Kim Berry 33 Challenges in Minimizing Teacher Authority While Facilitating a Student-Owned Activism Project Nicholas Chagnon and Donna King 45 Keeping People In Their Homes: Boston’s Anti-Foreclosure Movement Chris Larson 61 A Study Abroad Program in Tanzania: The Evolution of Social Justice Action Work Elizabeth M. Cannon and Carmen Heider 85 How Porous are the Walls That Separate Us?: Transformative Service-Learning, Women’s Incarceration, and The Unsettled Self Coralynn V. Davis and Carol Wayne White Humboldt Journal of Social Relations Introduction from the Managing Editors Jennifer Miles and Michael P. Weiss The theme of Issue 34 of the Humboldt Journal of Social Relations is Social Justice Ac- tion, Teaching, and Research. The first article of this issue, “The Art of Social Activism,” fea- tures the works of a slam poet, Vanessa Pike-Vrtiak, an activist artist, Eduardo Valadez, and an overview of the social science literature capturing the role of art in social justice movements. The two artists featured are both active in their communities and worldwide via the internet, raising awareness about inequality, lack of access to resources, and barriers to social justice. Their work adds to the rich heritage of artists who came before them, who use their art to create safe spaces, help define social justice movements, create empathy, and inspire action. The next two pieces focus on action and pedagogy related to social justice for queer people. Christina Accomando’s article “Social Justice Action and Teaching: the Legacies of Eric Rofes” is about continuing the activism of educator Eric Rofes. The article highlights how activism takes place on many fronts, including academic settings and in non-academic commu- nities. The next article, “Designing ‘Queer’ Across Cultures: Disrupting the Consumption of Diversity” by Kim Berry, shows how a queer films class was difficult to teach without recreat- ing socially constructed dichotomies, and required looking further to challenge colonialism and hegemonic difference. In their piece “Challenges in Minimizing Teacher Authority While Facilitating a Stu- dent-Owned Activism Project,” authors Nicholas Chagnon and Donna King utilize an anarchist framework in constructing an upper-division Sociology of Popular Culture class. Chagnon and King integrated core principles of anarchism, such as non-hierarchical organization and direct action (also being used in Anti Globalization and Occupy Wall Street movements) into their curriculum. Continuing with an exploration of social action is Chris Larson’s “Keeping People in Their Homes: Boston’s Anti-Foreclosure Movement.” His work shows how networks of grassroots organizations, legal service attorneys, neighborhood organizers, and homeowners work together to help fight foreclosure in Boston, Massachusetts after the 2009 housing market collapse. Larson shows how multiple movement tactics (including both direct action and the insider action) can complement each other, and how they form the basis for crucial negotiation tactics that can be used by homeowners facing foreclosure. The final two articles continue exploring issues related to teaching and social justice action themes. These articles address the challenges educators face crafting pedagogical prac- tices that disrupt hierarchical dichotomies of us/ them and server/ served. In “A Study Abroad Program in Tanzania: the Evolution of Social Justice Action Work,” authors Elizabeth Cannon and Carmen Heider document three study abroad trips in which student experiences were valu- able tools in informing and helping construct the program. In the next article, “How Porous are the Walls that Separate Us?: Transformative Service Learning, Incarceration, and the Unsettled Self,” authors Coralynn Davis and Carol White share their experience teaching the class “Women and the Penal System: Knowing Ourselves, Our Communities, and Our Institutions” within a women’s prison. Davis and White built their program through Butin’s political and antifoundational perspectives on service learning to create a classroom climate that would break down perceived barriers between incarcerated women and university students. SOCIAL JUSTICE ACTION, TEACHING, AND RESEARCH ISSUE 34 2012 1 Humboldt Journal of Social Relations The Art of Social Justice Jennifer Miles and Laura Dawson Introduction As this HJSR special issue on social justice unfolded, it became clear to the editorial team that this publication would be incomplete without addressing the well-documented role of art in social justice movements. We asked two of our managing editors, Jennifer Miles and Laura Dawson, to research and write about this area of social action. They interviewed two artists, a spoken word performer and a visual artist, both of whom understand their art as part of larger social justice projects. These artists raise awareness, highlight obstacles and avenues for change, and create space for solidarity and sanctuary. The following montage situates their artistry within their own biographies and a rich history of social change through art. Mary Virnoche and Jennifer Eichstedt, Editors. Visual and performing arts are woven radical feminist Carol Hanisch (1970) noted, into the histories of many movements for “the personal is political.” social change. The Black Arts and Feminist While academics study inequality in Arts movements of the 1960’s and 1970’s ways that provide statistical as well as narra- left us an exciting repository of paintings, tive understanding of causes and consequenc- poetry, music and more (Collins 2006; Gard- es, poets deepen our understanding of that ine- ner-Hugget 2007). Artists do more than doc- quality by giving powerful voice to its effects. ument change. The artist, as well as the art, By speaking with naked emotions such as inform and shape change (Martinez 2007). rage, helplessness, frustration, and hope, poet- Art simultaneously draws from culture and ry delivers a perspective of inequality many produces culture. In this sense art is political individuals may never have encountered were “because meanings are constitutive of pro- it not for the poet baring their soul. This in- cesses that, implicitly or explicitly, seek to terpersonal dialectic inspires empathy, which redefine social power” (Alvarez, Dagnino can spur social action in the poet’s audience. and Escobar 1998:7). Art can redefine social Clay (2006) and Reed (2005) write of poetry power through creating space that is safe and as a culture-building tool within social move- inclusive, allowing people to connect their ments. McCaughan (2006) and Anzaldúa personal stories with those of others in the (2002) write of the depth of knowing struggle for justice, develop ways to deal (conocimiento) that art and poetry provide, in with the struggle, and inspire hope. contrast and in addition to intellectual meth- As a way of situating social justice on a ods of inquiry and related narrative forms. personal level, poetry evokes in the listener/ Audre Lorde makes a strong case for the reader a visceral reaction to lived experi- transformative potential of poetry and the