The Post Foreclosure Eviction Defense Campaign
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Class of 2020
HARVARD LAW SCHOOL CLASS OF 2020 CLINICAL AND PRO BONO PROGRAMS LEARNING THE LAW, SERVING THE WORLD COMMENCEMENT NEWSLETTER MAY 2020 LEARNING THE LAW SERVING THE WORLD “One of the best aspects of Harvard Law School is working with the remarkable energy, creativity, and dynamism of our students. They come to HLS with a wide range of backgrounds and a wealth of experiences from which our Clinics and our clients benefit and grow. Our Clinical Program is never static—we are constantly reinventing ourselves in response to client needs, student interests, and national and international issues. As we advise and mentor individual students on their path to becoming ethical lawyers, the students, in turn, teach us to look at legal problems with a fresh set of eyes each and every day. This constant sense of wonder permeates our Clinical Programs and invigorates the learning process.” Lisa Dealy Assistant Dean for Clinical and Pro Bono Programs 1 CLASS OF 2020: BY THE NUMBERS IN-HOUSE CLINICS • Animal Law and Policy Clinic • Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation • Food Law and Policy Clinic 72% 52% • Health Law and Policy Clinic OF THE J.D. CLASS DID TWO OR PARTICIPATED IN MORE CLINICS • Criminal Justice Institute CLINICAL WORK • Crimmigration Clinic • Cyberlaw Clinic • Education Law Clinic • Emmett Environmental Law and Policy Clinic • Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program • Harvard Legal Aid Bureau 364,637 640 AVERAGE # OF PRO • Harvard Dispute Systems Design PRO BONO HOURS Clinic COMPLETED BY THE BONO HOURS • Impact Defense Initiative J.D. CLASS OF 2020 PER STUDENT • International Human Rights Clinic • Making Rights Real: The Ghana Project Clinic • Transactional Law Clinics • WilmerHale Legal Services Center • Domestic Violence and Family 50 1035 Law Clinic PRO BONO HOURS CLINICAL • Federal Tax Clinic REQUIRED OF J.D. -
Urban Markets Initiativeurban Markets Initiative
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM T HE B ROOKINGS I NSTITUTION Neighborhood Housing Markets and the Memphis Model Linking Information to Neighborhood Action in Memphis, Tennessee By Phyllis G. Betts lthough downtown revitalization, innovative mixed-income redevelop- ment, and gentrification are reinvigorating deteriorated inner-city A neighborhoods in cities across the country, too little attention is paid to declining middle-income neighborhoods such as Hickory Hill in Memphis, Tennessee.1 In the absence of interest from either urban pioneers or targeted government programs, these neighborhoods continue to decline, and poverty enclaves are recreated within once middle-class housing markets. The signifi- cance of declining middle-class neighborhoods is underscored by a comparison of 1970 and 2000 census data, where the percentage of middle-income neigh- borhoods among all neighborhoods in metropolitan areas declined from 58% to 41%.2 Urban policymakers often have neither a fundamental understanding of what is happening in these housing markets nor a strategy to advance them. The Memphis Neighborhood Housing Markets Modeling project (the Memphis Model) is addressing this information gap using Hickory Hill, a destabilizing community southeast of downtown Memphis, as a pilot community. This brief discusses how the Memphis Model uses insights from the “information cycle” to conceptualize and implement local information systems that close the information gap for declining middle-income housing markets.3 New knowledge is mobilizing stakeholders and -
Homeownership Is Affordable Housing
Briefing on Affordable Homeownership and Infrastructure Briefing Book Table of Contents 1. Agenda 2. Black Homeownership Collaborative’s 7-Point Plan 3. Case for Homeownership 4. Restoring Communities Left Behind Act, Fact Sheet 5. Neighborhood Homes Investment Act, Fact Sheet 6. Urban Institute: Research on Homeownership and Housing Affordability Agenda 2:00 p.m. Introduction and welcome – David Dworkin, President & CEO, National Housing Conference 2:05 p.m. Mike Loftin, CEO, Homewise, Inc. Albuquerque, New Mexico and Nonresident Fellow, Urban Institute - Homeownership is affordable housing 2:15 p.m. Panel Discussion – How homeownership benefits families and the economy and how nonprofits are creating new paths to homeownership • Ed Lee, President & CEO, Habitat for Humanity of Greater Cincinnati • Tayani Suma, Senior Vice President, Real Estate, Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership • Noerena Limon, Senior Vice President for Public Policy and Industry Relations, National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals 2:35 p.m. How Tennessee is expanding homeownership Ralph Perrey, Executive Director, Tennessee Housing Development Agency 2:45 p.m. H.R. 816, the Restoring Communities Left Behind Act Representative Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) 2:50 p.m. S. 98, the Neighborhood Homes Investment Act Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) 2:55 p.m. Conclusion Natosha Reid Rice, Vice President, Global Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer, Habitat for Humanity A 7-point plan to increase Black homeownership by 3 million households by 2030 The Black homeownership rate has plummeted to levels not seen since segregation in housing was legal. Even more disturbing is the fact that in the decade since the end of the Great Recession, it has continued to fall, while every other demographic group has seen significant recovery. -
CLEA Newsltr 0211.Pub
CLINICAL LEGAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION Volume XIX No. 2 FEBRUARY, 2011 CLEA Newsletter PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE I am so pleased to serve as the 20 th President of CLEA and continue our work together in support of clinical legal education. With over 900 members, we are America’s largest membership organization of law faculty. We have an ambitious, change- Ian Weinstein Fordham Law School oriented agenda and as an All Volunteer Non-Profit Organization, CLEA President CLEA proudly relies on each of you and the wonderful work you [email protected] do. In this message, I report on the recent CLEA elections, Inside this issue: CLEA advocacy on the ABA’s review of Accreditation Standards, and several ongoing and upcoming projects. The activities noted Committee Reports 4 reflect the hard work of so many people and the exemplary lead- Conferences 6 ership of our Immediate Past President, Bob Kuehn (Washington New Clinicians 12 University Law School) . Bob’s contributions and strengths are 15 too numerous to list here but I think they are quite well known to Transitions 17 most of you. If he were only the go-to guy on political interfer- Promotions, Honors & Awards ence, that would be such a huge contribution in and of itself; but he has done and does so much more. He leaves very big shoes News from Clinical Pro- 21 for my rather compact feet. grams Books & Publications 60 Elections, Officers and Board Members Job Announcements 69 Binny Miller (American University Washington College EDITOR of Law) , Chair of the Elections Committee and Kate Kruse (University of Nevada, Las Vegas Law School) , CLEA Secre- tary , worked hard and conducted our annual elections in the Larry R. -
In This Issue
April, 2014 | Issue IV Newsletter Clinical and Pro Bono Programs LEARNING THE LAW | SERVING THE WORLD IN THIS ISSUE: Center for Health Law & Policy Innovation Judicial Process in Community Courts Clinic Clinical Spotlight Law Student Ethics Award Cyberlaw Clinic Project No One Leaves Family and Domestic Violence Law Clinic Semester in Washington Gary Bellow Public Service Award Shareholder Rights Project Harvard Legal Aid Bureau Sports Law Clinic Harvard Immigration & Refugee Clinic Tenant Advocacy Project Harvard Negotiation & Mediation Clinical Program Teaching Excellence Award Housing Law Clinic CLINICAL AND PRO BONO PROGRAMS PAGE 1 HARVARD LEGAL AID BUREAU HLAB Students Win a Quarter of a Million Dollars By Carolina Kupferman, J.D. ’15 My legs were shaking under me as I stood up in front of office until the early hours of the morning for days in a the judge to give my opening statement. My speech in row looking through documents, searching for front of me, an assortment of possible objections jotted inconsistencies, conceptualizing the financial fraud, and down on post-it notes, and a 3-inch binder of documents I picturing every instance of abuse. scoured for days were my only available weapons. On the day of trial, we argued that the house and bank After just a few weeks at the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau, I account were marital assets and our client deserved 50% had my first trial. I had only three weeks of Evidence class of the equity in the house and the 401K, and the money under my belt, plus one motion hearing I argued in front of removed from their bank account. -
CLEA Newsltr0910.Pub
CLINICAL LEGAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION Volume 14 No. 1 September, 2010 CLEA Newsletter PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE ON MAKING SAUSAGE, LEGISLATION & ACCREDITATION STANDARDS As the famous New York Yankee philosopher Yogi Berra Bob Kuehn once said, “you can observe a lot by watching.” There is always Washington University much to watch at the beginning of a school year – yourself as you in St. Louis shake off the sand and sunscreen of summer and start another (or your first!) year of teaching, 1Ls as they become acclimatized [email protected] to law school, your clinic students as they begin their metamor- phosis into student attorneys, and the faculty as it steps back Inside this issue: into its governance role for the law school. There is also much to watch this time of year at the ABA, and some of it not pretty. Committee Reports 3 ABA Advocacy Notices 5 It been said (though by Chancellor Otto von Bismarck , not Yogi Berra) that there are two things you should never watch be- Conferences 10 ing made – sausage and legislation. Sadly, we can now list a New Clinicians 13 third – the making of ABA Accreditation Standards dealing with 17 law school faculty. Transitions In July, the ABA’s Standards Review Committee began its Promotions, Honors & 20 public discussion of the proposed deletion, advanced by the Awards Chair of the Committee (Don Polden, Dean of Santa Clara School of Law), of Standards 405(b) (addressing tenure) and 405(c) News from Clinical Pro- 24 (addressing security of position for full-time clinical faculty). The grams American Law Deans Association (ALDA) has long sought to Books & Publications 54 eliminate security of position for clinical faculty, and some think that the ABA’s apparent interest in expanding its accreditation Job Announcements 60 reach to foreign law schools (particularly the new Peking Univer- CLEA Writing Contest 74 sity School of Transnational Law in China) is further fueling the effort inside the ABA to eliminate tenure. -
How Porous Are the Walls That Separate Us?: Transformative Service-Learning, Women’S Incarceration, and the Unsettled Self
Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Faculty Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2012 How Porous are the Walls that Separate Us?: Transformative Service-Learning, Women’s Incarceration, and the Unsettled Self Coralynn V. Davis Bucknell University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/fac_journ Part of the Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons, Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Community-Based Learning Commons, Criminology Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Epistemology Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Feminist Philosophy Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, Service Learning Commons, Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons, Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons, Social Psychology and Interaction Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Coralynn V., and Carol Wayne White. 2012. "How Porous are the Walls that Separate Us? Feminist Pedagogy, Incarceration, and Disseminating Knowledge." Humboldt Journal of Social Relations (special issue on Social Justice Action, Teaching and Research) 34:85-104. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations Issue 34 - Social Justice Action, Teaching, and Research Co-Editors: Jennifer L. Eichstedt Mary Virnoche Co-Managing Editors: Laura Dawson Jennifer Miles Michael P. Weiss Humboldt Journal Of Social Relations Issue 34 ■ 2012 Social Justice Action, Teaching, and Research Contents 1 Introduction Jennifer Miles and Michael P. -
A Foreclosure Rescue As the Solution to the Trapped Homeowner Equity Problem Cori Harvey Florida A&M University College of Law, [email protected]
Florida A&M University College of Law Scholarly Commons @ FAMU Law Journal Publications Faculty Works Spring 2014 "We Buy Houses": A Foreclosure Rescue as the Solution to the Trapped Homeowner Equity Problem Cori Harvey Florida A&M University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.law.famu.edu/faculty-research Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, Bankruptcy Law Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Cori Harvey, "We Buy Houses": A Foreclosure Rescue as the Solution to the Trapped Homeowner Equity Problem, 79 Mo. L. Rev. 371 (2014). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Works at Scholarly Commons @ FAMU Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ FAMU Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "We Buy Houses": A Foreclosure Rescue as the Solution to the Trapped Homeowner Equity Problem Cori Harvey* 1. INTRODUCTION Foreclosure rescue transactions are viewed widely as scams designed, among other things, to dupe poor, minority, and elderly homeowners out of the equity in their homes. 1 The transactions are frequently called "foreclosure rescue scams.t" "equity skimming schemes.t" or other derogatory terms. However, foreclosure rescue transactions come in many forms and, as an alternative to foreclosure, often maintain valuable options for homeowners that the homeowners otherwise would lose in the traditional foreclosure pro cess.4 For this reason, many of these transactions, though imperfect, should be preserved and supported. -
DREAMS FORECLOSED: the Rampant Theft of Americans’ Homes Through Equity-Stripping Foreclosure “Rescue” Scams
DREAMS FORECLOSED: The Rampant Theft of Americans’ Homes Through Equity-stripping Foreclosure “Rescue” Scams DREAMS FORECLOSED: The Rampant Theft of Americans’ Homes A Report by Through Equity-Stripping National Consumer Law Center Foreclosure “Rescue” Scams June 2005 Written and researched by: Steve Tripoli, Consumer Advocate, National Consumer Law Center Elizabeth Renuart, Staff Attorney, National Consumer Law Center ACKNOWLEDGMENTS National Consumer Law Center attorneys Will Ogburn, John Rao and Margot Saunders provided legal guidance and editorial assistance in the preparation of this report. NCLC’s Svetlana Ladan formatted the report and its graphics. We also wish to thank the dozens of consumer lawyers, advocates, their clients and others named in this report for their unstinting devotion to seeing this information come to light and their substantial efforts to provide that information. Cover art courtesy of Benenson Janson Advertising, Studio City, CA. National Consumer Law Center is a non-profit organization with 37 years of working experience in consumer issues, especially those affecting low-income consumers. NCLC works with and offers training to thousands of legal- service, government and private attorneys, as well as community groups and organizations representing low-income and elderly people. Our legal manuals and consumer guides are standards of the field and can be ordered directly at www.consumerlaw.org or by calling our Publications Department at 617-542-9595. National Consumer Law Center 77 Summer St. 10th Floor Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617-542-8010 http://www.consumerlaw.org Copies of this report are available by mail for $35 each paid in advance (checks only), or by downloading from NCLC’s website TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: THE BLIND SPOT 100,000 HOMES WIDE..................................................5 PART 1: STEALING WHATEVER IS NAILED DOWN...............................................................7 l. -
Foreclosure Reform Amid Mortgage Lending Turmoil: a Public Purpose Approach
Scholarship Repository University of Minnesota Law School Articles Faculty Scholarship 2008 Foreclosure Reform Amid Mortgage Lending Turmoil: A Public Purpose Approach Prentiss Cox University of Minnesota Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Prentiss Cox, Foreclosure Reform Amid Mortgage Lending Turmoil: A Public Purpose Approach, 45 HOUS. L. REV. 683 (2008), available at https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/277. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in the Faculty Scholarship collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE FORECLOSURE REFORM AMID MORTGAGE LENDING TURMOIL: A PUBLIC PURPOSE APPROACH Prentiss Cox* TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODU CTION ..................................................................... 685 II. RISING MORTGAGE FORECLOSURES IN THE U NITED STATES ......................................................... 687 A. Rising Foreclosuresand the Subprime Lending Connection ..................................................... 688 B. Impact of Rising Foreclosureson Communities ........... 693 1. Concentrated Subprime Mortgage ForeclosuresAre Causing Blight ........................... 693 2. Metropolitan Example: Minneapolis, Minnesota ........................................ 696 III. BORROWERS, LENDERS, AND -
Loans and Credit
Credit Repair Scams Tips: What is in your Credit Report? There is a brisk business among so-called Shop Around If you’re having trouble getting credit, try “credit repair” companies that charge from Once you have determined which type of checking your credit report yourself. You $50 to more than $1,000 to “fix” your loan is best for you, check with several can obtain one free credit report a year credit report. In many cases, these outfits lenders, compare terms, rates and conditions. from each credit reporting bureau, by take your money and do little or nothing to visiting www.annualcreditreport.com or by improve your credit report. Often, they just Ask Questions contacting the three credit reporting bureaus: vanish. There are no quick or easy cures Is the application fee refundable if you Equifax, Experian, and Transunion. The for a poor credit history. If a credit repair don’t qualify or decide not to accept the credit report tells how you’ve managed company promises you it can clean up your loan? What is the annual percentage rate? your credit in the past. Companies examine credit report, remember the following: Is it fixed or adjustable? Is there a balloon your credit report before deciding whether payment at the end of the term? to give you credit. When a company denies Your credit history is maintained by private your request for credit because of your companies called credit bureaus that collect Review and Negotiate credit report, it must tell you so and identify information reported to them by banks, Once you have chosen a lender, try to the credit reporting bureau that supplied the mortgage companies, department stores, negotiate. -
Office of Clinical & Pro Bono Programs
Office of Clinical & Pro Bono Programs Information for LL.M. Students Harvard Law School Harvard Law School 2021-2022 Clinical Learning at HLS Harvard Law School’s approach to clinical legal education has three basic components: 1. Clinical work providing direct student responsibility for clients and/or cases in a real practice setting. 2. Supervision, mentorship and feedback by experienced practitioners. 3. A companion academic course in which the students bring their clinical experience into the classroom while also bringing their classroom training back into their clinical work. Students receive “clinical credit” for the clinical work and “classroom credit” for the related course component. All credits count towards the credit requirements for the LL.M. degree. Fall, Clinical Credits • Minimum (usually 3) 3 clinical credits 12 hours/week Spring • Typically 2 credits Classroom Credits Fall, 4 clinical credits 16 hours/week Spring Fall, 5 clinical credits 20 hours/week Spring You can learn more about the individual clinics offered at HLS by visiting the link below. LL.M. students in F-1 student status are eligible to participate in our In-House Clinics: https://hls.harvard.edu/dept/clinical/clinics/in-house-clinics/ Note on Externship Clinics: International students on F-1 student visas are required to have Curricular Practical Training (CPT) authorization in order to participate in an externship clinic at HLS; LL.M. students are not eligible for CPT. If you are not on an F-1 student visa and would like to speak with us about your potential eligibility for externship opportunities, please reach out! 3 Clinical Terminology What is an In-House clinic? In-House clinics are fully functioning law offices at HLS, directed by HLS Clinical Professors and Instructors.