DOCSLIB.ORG

Time Noted: 9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Time Noted: 9 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS East West Link Proposal HEARING at HUNTERVILLE ROOM, ASCOT STAND, ELLERSLIE EVENT CENTRE, 80 ASCOT AVENUE, REMUERA, AUCKLAND on 7 August 2017 BOARD OF INQUIRY: Dr John Priestley (Chair) CNZM QC Mr Alan Bickers (Deputy Chair) MNZM JP Mr Michael Parsonson (Board Member) Ms Sheena Tepania (Board Member) Hearing Proceedings Day 24 Monday 7 August 2017 Time Name Representing Topic Documents Submitted / Transcript Ref. Presented Page no's 9.09 am Dr Priestley Board of Inquiry Housekeeping 3190 9.10 am Ms Eaves Auckland Council Examination-in-chief by Mr Hearing Summary 3190 Lanning Exhibit I – Te Kawerau Iwi NZ Map Exhibit J – Cultural sites and walking route Map 9.21 am Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3194 9.31 am Mr Enright Ngāti Whātua Cross-examination 3197 Orākei and Te Kawerau Iwi Tribal Authority 9.48 am Dr Hewison The Onehunga Cross-examination 3203 Enhancement Society 9.55 am Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3205 9.58 am Mr Mulligan NZ Transport Cross-examination 3206 Agency 10.11 am Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3210 10.14 am Mr Mulligan NZ Transport Cross-examination cont'd 3212 Agency 10.33 am Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3219 10.34 am Dr Priestley Board of Inquiry Housekeeping 3220 10.36 am Morning tea 3222 10.51 am Mr Mulligan NZ Transport Cross-examination cont'd 3222 Agency 11.03 am Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3227 11.15 am Dr Priestley Board of Inquiry Housekeeping 3231 11.17 am Mr Gordon KiwiRail Examination-in-chief by Ms Hearing summary 3232 Arthur-Young 11.23 am Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3235 11.35 am Ms Evitt NZ Transport Cross-examination 3239 Agency 11.41 am Ms Beals KiwiRail Examination-in-chief by Ms Hearing summary 3243 Arthur-Young 11.49 am Ms Evitt NZ Transport Cross-examination 3246 Agency 11.51 am Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3247 11.54 am Mr Norman Auckland Council Examination-in-chief by Mr 3248 Lanning 11.55 am Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3249 12.10 pm Dr Hewison The Onehunga Cross-examination 3255 Enhancement Society 12.28 pm Lunch 3262 1.31 pm Mr Pitches Campaign for Cross-examination 3262 Better Transport 1.42 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3268 1.47 pm Mr Mulligan NZ Transport Cross-examination 3270 Agency 2.13 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3280 2.14 pm Mr Mulligan NZ Transport Cross-examination cont'd 3280 Agency 2.17 pm Dr Priestley Board of Inquiry Discussion with Mr Pitches 3281 2.18 pm Mr Mulligan NZ Transport Cross-examination cont'd 3282 Agency 2.23 pm Mr Lanning Auckland Council Re-examination 3284 2.28 pm Ms Soene Auckland Council Examination-in-chief by Mr 3286 Lanning 2.28 pm Dr Hewison The Onehunga Cross-examination 3286 Enhancement Society 2.41 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3290 2.57 pm Mr Mulligan NZ Transport Cross-examination 3296 Agency 3.02 pm Mr Marler Auckland Council Examination-in-chief by Mr Exhibit K – East West 3299 Lanning Connection, Working Group Minutes 31.05.17 Exhibit L – Towards an Onehunga Foreshore Concept Plan, workshop two 24.05.17 3.02 pm Dr Hewison The Onehunga Cross-examination 3299 Enhancement Society 3.12 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3301 3.14 pm Dr Hewison The Onehunga Cross-examination cont'd 3301 Enhancement Society 3.12 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3302 3.14 pm Dr Hewison The Onehunga Cross-examination cont'd 3303 Enhancement Society 3.17 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3304 3.18 pm Dr Hewison The Onehunga Cross-examination cont'd 3305 Enhancement Society 3.36 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3308 3.30 pm Dr Priestley Board of Inquiry Housekeeping 3310 3.31 pm Afternoon tea 3311 3.46 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3311 3.49 pm Mr Burns The Onehunga Cross-examination 3312 Enhancement Society 3.59 pm Ms Kinzett Onehunga Cross-examination 3316 Business Association 4.09 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3321 4.11 pm Ms Kinzett Onehunga Cross-examination cont'd 3322 Business Association 4.15 pm Mr Jackson The Onehunga Cross-examination 3324 Enhancement Society 4.17 pm Mr Mulligan NZ Transport Cross-examination 3325 Agency 4.43 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3337 4.44 pm Mr Lanning Auckland Council Re-examination 3337 4.50 pm Board Board of Inquiry Questions 3339 4.52 pm Mr Lanning Auckland Council Re-examination cont'd 3340 4.54 pm Dr Priestley Board of Inquiry Housekeeping 3341 4.59 pm Adjourn 3346 Page 3190 [9.09 am] DR PRIESTLEY: Counsel, as you know we are going to be deposing at some stage two KiwiRail witnesses who have commitments which need to be 5 accommodated elsewhere but we're ready to start at 9.00 am with Ms Eaves, Mr Lanning, is she ready to go? MR LANNING: She is. 10 DR PRIESTLEY: Swear her in, please. MR LANNING: Sir, while Ms Eaves is coming up, can I also indicate that Ms Bartley, who's the chair of the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Board is still unwell. 15 DR PRIESTLEY: She is still sick? MR LANNING: So the deputy chair, Mr Diver, is available today and he can effectively adopt her evidence and answer any questions from the Board's point of view, if that is acceptable? 20 DR PRIESTLEY: Are you calling him today? MR LANNING: Yes, if that's acceptable to the Board, rather than delaying. 25 [9.10 am] DR PRIESTLEY: But also we've had a phone call from a Mr Pitches who is chair or spokesperson for the Campaign for Better Transport and he is anxious to cross-examine your economics witness, Mr Norman. I don't know 30 whether you know that. So that may change the timing estimate slightly. MR LANNING: Yes. 35 DR PRIESTLEY: Please swear in the witness, thank you. Ms Eaves (affirmed) MR LANNING: Good morning, Ms Eaves, could you please confirm that your full name 40 is Myfanwy May Eaves? MS EAVES: It is. MR LANNING: And have you produced a statement of primary evidence for this 45 hearing? MS EAVES: I did. Ellerslie Event Centre, Auckland 07.08.17 Page 3191 MR LANNING: Do you have the qualifications and experience set out in section 1 of that evidence? MS EAVES: I do. 5 MR LANNING: Can you confirm the evidence is true and correct? MS EAVES: It is. 10 MR LANNING: Have you produced a summary statement of evidence? MS EAVES: I have. MR LANNING: Could you please read through that, thank you? 15 DR PRIESTLEY: Have you got it there, Ms Eaves? MS EAVES: I've got my edited version and a slightly messy one and I can read from that. 20 DR PRIESTLEY: Has she got what you want her to read, Mr Lanning? MR LANNING: I hope so, sir. 25 DR PRIESTLEY: Well, maybe you should check. MR LANNING: That would be preferred. MS EAVES: It's Monday. 30 "Corrections to evidence, 1, 8.2(f) on page 10, omission of "an". The sentence should read "by and large an archaeologist". (b) Line 1, page 13, omission of a word, "It is strongly suggested that 35 the methods of interpretation that may be provided as mitigation cover the entire East West Link route". (c) Section 5.2 of my evidence-in-chief, I refer to the first fencible core in New Zealand, the first and only mildly fencible core was located on 40 their own land at what is now Mangere Bridge village. Governor Grey signed an agreement with Ngāti Mahuta to create this core in 1849. The communities on either side of the Manukau inlet crossing, which are bridged, are inextricably linked. 45 (d) The Aotea Sea Scouts Hall, number 2598, and Waikaraka grounds and cemetery, number 1755, are schedule for multiple historic heritage values and are subject to additional rules for archaeological sites and Ellerslie Event Centre, Auckland 07.08.17 Page 3192 features. (e) I have visited the publicly accessible sites on numerous occasions with and without NZ Transport Agency and my colleagues. I have not 5 visited the Anns Creek area as the area is either private property or hazardous rail corridor. 2. Overview of key conclusions of evidence. Dr Felgate has adequately identified and assessed the potential effects on 10 archaeological sites to identify that risk to historic heritage along the application route. Accordingly, I make no changes to my evidence-in- chief. 3. Summary of issues resolved and unresolved. The draft conditions 15 for historic heritage remain unresolved. The issues relate to the relationship between the two statutory regimes covering archaeology. One is the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014, HNZPTA, the other is the Resource Management Act 1991, RMA. The RMA definition of historic heritage is broad and contains archaeology as one 20 of the contributing resources to our understanding of our history. These two pieces of legislation work in tandem. I consider it is not appropriate to exclude one in preference for the other. Within the project designation conditions I consider it appropriate that 25 reference is only made to the relevant Auckland Unitary Plan provisions which protect historic heritage as defined by the RMA. The key provisions in the unitary plan for addressing unseen historic heritage are the accidental discovery rules contained in E11(6) regional and E12(6) district. These provisions contain mechanisms to inform 30 relevant authorities and parties in the event of an accidental find, including Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning Committee Meeting Held on 4/02/2020
    Memorandum 20 December 2019 To: Planning Committee Independent Māori Statutory Board Subject: The Draft New Zealand Rail Plan From: Ryan Falconer Lead Transport Advisor Contact information: [email protected] Purpose 1. To provide an overview of the background to and content of the Draft New Zealand Rail Plan (the Plan), and analysis of preliminary implications of this Plan for Auckland Council and Auckland Transport. 2. To provide advice on the relevance of the Plan to Auckland and recommend providing informal feedback to the Ministry of Transport in advance of formal engagement in 2020. Summary 3. The Draft National Rail Plan provides context for proposed reform of rail network planning and investment in New Zealand, integrating rail with the balance of the land transport system and establishing a funding basis from the National Land Transport Fund. 4. The Plan is being publicised simultaneously with proposed legislative change (related amendments to the Land Transport Management Act 2003 and Land Transport Act 1988). This proposed legislative change is addressed in a separate Planning Committee memorandum. 5. The Plan emphasises the planning, funding and operations of both Auckland and Wellington’s metropolitan rail networks and prioritises addressing the needs of both passenger and freight traffic. 6. The Government has invited informal comments on the Plan. The Plan will be out for formal public engagement, alongside the Government Policy Statement on Land Transport, in 2020. However, the Government has invited informal feedback on the plan prior to this. Staff propose providing informal feedback to the Ministry of Transport in January in accordance with the points raised in this memorandum.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 08-102 Metro Passenger Train Derailment, Sylvia Park, 14 April 2008
    Report 08-102 Metro passenger train derailment, Sylvia Park, 14 April 2008 (incorporating inquiries 08-104 and 08-107) Diesel motor fires on board metro passenger trains, 3 June 2008 and 25 July 2008 The Transport Accident Investigation Commission is an independent Crown entity established to determine the circumstances and causes of accidents and incidents with a view to avoiding similar occurrences in the future. Accordingly it is inappropriate that reports should be used to assign fault or blame or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The Commission may make recommendations to improve transport safety. The cost of implementing any recommendation must always be balanced against its benefits. Such analysis is a matter for the regulator and the industry. These reports may be reprinted in whole or in part without charge, providing acknowledgement is made to the Transport Accident Investigation Commission. Final Report Rail Inquiry 08-102 Metro passenger train derailment, Sylvia Park, 14 April 2008 (incorporating inquiries 08-104 and 08-107) Diesel motor fires on board metro passenger trains, 3 June 2008 and 25 July 2008 Approved for publication: August 2011 Transport Accident Investigation Commission About the Transport Accident Investigation Commission The Transport Accident Investigation Commission (Commission) is an independent Crown entity responsible for inquiring into maritime, aviation and rail accidents and incidents for New Zealand, and co-ordinating and co-operating with other accident investigation organisations overseas. The principal purpose of its inquiries is to determine the circumstances and causes of occurrences with a view to avoiding similar occurrences in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • KAIPARA SPATIAL PLAN - KEY URBAN AREAS Adopted | 27 May 2020
    DARGAVILLE | MAUNGATŪROTO | KAIWAKA KAIPARA SPATIAL PLAN - KEY URBAN AREAS Adopted | 27 May 2020 Prepared for By RESILIOSTUDIO Kaipara District AR & Associates Resilio Limited Council Level 2, 129 Hurstmere Road 10 West Terrace 42 Hokianga Rd, Takapuna Newton Dargaville 0310 Auckland 0622 Auckland 1010 +0800 727 059 www.arassociates.co.nz www.resilio.nz North Island: Contact_ Gary Marshall Contact_ Joao Machado +64 21 591 279 +64 272 950 386 [email protected] [email protected] South Island: Contact_ Gavin Flynn +64 21 704 332 [email protected] KAIPARA SPATIAL PLAN_KEY URBAN AREAS MIHI Whakatōngia te kākano ki a tipu ia ngā māramatanga. Mā te ako ka mōhio, mā mōhio ka mārama, mā te mārama ka mātau, mā te mātau ka ora e! Sow the seed to nurture understanding. With learning comes knowledge, with knowledge comes understanding, with understanding comes awareness, with awareness comes wisdom, with wisdom comes wellness! Resilio Studio | AR + Associates Limited | May 2020 KAIPARA SPATIAL PLAN_KEY URBAN AREAS FOREWORD It is my pleasure to present the Kaipara Key Urban Areas Spatial Plan, our guide for how we plan for growing the historic towns of Dargaville, Maungatūroto and Kaiwaka. This is planning of a shape, size and scale never undertaken before in Kaipara District. Thanks to all who have contributed to the collaborative engagement approach of this spatial planning process. For some this has been an ‘eye opener’ on how to locate where appropriate development could occur and what are the important parts we cherish in each of the towns; it's given us new ways to see our familiar places.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Electrification and Extension from Papakura to Pukekohe Updates Glossary
    Agenda Item 13 (iv) Rail Electrification and Extension from Papakura to Pukekohe Updates Glossary Auckland Council (AC) Auckland Electrified Area (AEA) Auckland Plan (AP) Auckland Transport (AT) Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF) Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) Electric Multiple Unit (EMU) KiwiRail Group (KRG) New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) North Auckland Line (NAL) North Island Main Trunk Line (NIMT) Onehunga Branch Line (OBL) Regional Land Transport Programme (RLTP) Rapid Transit Network (RTN) Executive Summary Item 1: Auckland Rail Electrification Update AT and KRG are currently undertaking preparatory works for electrification of the Auckland Rail Network between Papakura and Swanson Stations, with the first EMU services being tested and commissioned from September 2013. The target is for EMU passenger services to be introduced from December 2013, initially on the OBL. The remainder of the EMU fleet will be introduced in stages until the full fleet is in service under current programme timelines in mid-2016. The electrification projects can be grouped as follows: a) Installation and commissioning of electrification infrastructure: overhead wires, gantries, earthing of stations, etc., primary responsibility with KRG. b) Station and depot infrastructure: preparation for electrification includes construction of an EMU depot at Wiri, upgrading of a number of existing stations to a common standard, construction of a new station at Parnell, ensuring sufficient stabling for the EMU fleet. Responsibility is primarily with AT; c) Procurement of new EMU fleet: Including operational transitioning from the existing DMU and diesel locomotives to the new EMUs. Responsibility rests with AT. d) Operational readiness for electrification: Training of staff, train drivers and contractors for working within an electrified environment, agreement on responsibility for maintaining electrification assets, agreement on safety provisions for public and contractors, communications with the public and other stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • City Rail Link - Summary of Submissions
    City Rail Link - Summary of Submissions Sub Sub Submitter Organisation Name Topic Description Summary No. Matter Name I am writing to add my voice of support for the CRL project. As a daily user of commuter trains in Wellington I strongly believe that the link will make Glenn Auckland a more vibrant city, which is easier to travel around. It will also make Auckland a more attractive holiday destination - especially to those 1 1/1 1.1 Support - NOR All Chadwick who don't drive - or won't drive in a city that they are unfamiliar with. I feel it is important to register my support - despite not living in Auckland, because it should be on record that this project has support from people outside Auckland. 2 2/1 Erin E Wi 1.1 Support - NOR All 5 The submitter seeks that: (a) The NOR for the CRL proposal be cancelled and withdrawn. (b) That any designation of other approval of the CRL proposal includes and is subject to LIFE's property and facilities first being relocated and re-established on an alternative site with the same CLC Trust attn Malcolm 1.23 Oppose / withdraw - 3 3/1 attributes as the LIFE Central site and facilities and within a specified timeframe not exceeding 2 years from the designation approval date; (c) That Board McLean NOR All the lapsing period of any designation or approval be limited to 5 years; and (d) Any further, additional or consequential relief that is necessary or appropriate in respect of the matters referred to in this submission.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Case Auckland CBD Rail Link Prepared for Kiwirail and ARTA
    Business Case Auckland CBD Rail Link Prepared for KiwiRail and ARTA By APB&B 19th November 2010 Revision History Revision Nº Prepared By Description Date V1h team Released to Clients 24 September 2010 V2 team Internal issue-edits and formatting 27 September 2010 Revised version released to V3a team 28 September 2010 Clients Third draft incorporating Client V5a team and Peer Review feedback on 2nd 18th October 2010 Draft incorporating Client and Peer nd Final draft team rd 22 October 2010 Review feedback on 3 Draft Final following Client 19th November FINAL Team endorsement 2010 Document Acceptance Action Name Signed Date Prepared by team 19th November Reviewed by David Adams 2010 19th November Approved by Alan Burford 2010 on behalf of APB&B CBD Rail Link Study Page 1 Business Case Table of Contents GLOSSARY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1 INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 OBJECTIVE 9 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE BUSINESS CASE 9 1.3 LAND USE SCENARIOS 9 1.4 OUTLINE 9 2 THE NEED FOR CHANGE 11 2.1 BACKGROUND 11 2.2 DRIVERS FOR CHANGE 12 2.3 AUCKLAND‟S TRANSPORT DEMAND 17 2.4 AUCKLAND CBD TRANSPORT SUPPLY 21 2.5 CONCLUSIONS 24 3 CBD TRANSPORTATION CONSTRAINTS AND ALTERNATIVES EXAMINED 26 3.1 TRANSPORT POLICY MEASURES CONSIDERED 26 3.2 EXISTING AUCKLAND RAIL NETWORK CONSTRAINTS 27 3.3 BUS NETWORK CONSTRAINTS 30 3.4 MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS 32 3.5 COST ASSESSMENT 33 3.6 CONCLUSIONS 34 4 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED SOLUTION 35 4.1 DESCRIPTION OF CBD RAIL LINK PROJECT 35 4.2 ALIGNMENT WITH GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES 44 5 ECONOMIC EVALUATION 48 5.1 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 48 5.2 COSTS
    [Show full text]
  • Business Case Summary
    Business Case Summary This document is AT’s internal business case to facilitate the Gateway Review process prior to letting contracts for enabling works construction. It is not a joint business case with government. Contents Message from the Chair of the Auckland Transport Board 5 Introduction 6 Benefits 7 Strategic Context 8 CRL and the Economy 12 Auckland’s Transport Challenges 14 Public Transport Patronage 15 Development Opportunities 17 Special Housing Areas 24 Travel Times 26 Financial 28 Sustainability 29 Infrastructure Sustainability framework 30 Consenting, Design, Procurement and Construction 31 Consultation 32 Enabling Works Programme Timeline 33 The CRL Citywide 34 Message from the Chair of the Auckland Transport Board The City Rail Link The CRL is Auckland Council’s priority project to support central Government’s economic productivity aims and its own vision of being the world’s most livable city. It is a 3.45km underground rail link from the current new and redeveloped stations, at Karangahape Road and Britomart Transport Centre to the North Auckland Line at a Mt Eden, will support the economic and land-use changes redeveloped Mt Eden Station with two new underground planned in those areas. Significant development is expected stations, Aotea and Karangahape. in all the station precincts, valued at some $1.2 – $1.4b, adding income for the Council where the development The CRL is part of an integrated transport and land-use occurs on its land holdings, in addition to enhanced Dr Lester Levy plan for Auckland including major investments in motorway transport patronage. Chairman, Auckland Transport Board and arterial roads.
    [Show full text]
  • City Rail Link Limited (CRLL)
    Designation Schedule – City Rail Link Limited (CRLL) Number Purpose Location 2500 City Rail Link (CRL) Various Locations 2501 This designation provides for the 12 Queen Street to Britomart Place, Auckland construction, operation and Central maintenance of a transport centre and the provision of a rail system. The centre comprises an underground Railway Station, attendant facilities and public access to the station through the main portal of the former Chief Post Office and at other access points. Above-ground features of the centre include the glazed annex to the Chief Post Office building, a series of skylights, ventilation stacks and other servicing plant and equipment. Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part 1 2500 City Rail Link Designation Number 2500 Requiring Authority City Rail Link Limited (CRLL) Location Various locations Rollover Designation No Lapse Date Given effect to (i.e. no lapse date) Purpose City Rail Link (CRL) Explanatory Note: The following explanatory note does not form part of the conditions. It is a non-statutory way finding explanation of how the conditions are structured, what they cover in broad terms and where referenced documents can be found. This note does not alter legal obligations and rights created by the conditions. The conditions attach to six different designations. The designations are: 2500-1 A surface designation extending from Britomart Transport Centre to Albert Street/Mayoral Drive (in the vicinity of the Aotea car park entrance on Mayoral Drive) for the construction, operation and maintenance of the CRL – including two rail tunnels and Aotea Station. 2500-2 A sub-strata designation of land below the ground surface (within road reserve and private property) for the construction, operation and maintenance of the CRL – including two rail tunnels and ancillary activities.
    [Show full text]
  • City Rail Link Packaging and Contract Models November 2016 CRL0080 J001772 KH 28 09 16 City Rail Link Packaging and Contract Models November 2016
    City Rail Link Packaging and Contract Models November 2016 CRL0080 J001772 KH 28_09_16 City Rail Link Packaging and Contract Models November 2016 Contents Foreword 3 Introduction 4 Procurement Packaging Strategy 5 Contract Models 6-11 Conflict Management 12 Tender interaction between C3 and C7 12 Next steps 13 Page 2 | AT.govt.nz/CRL Foreword THE CITY RAIL LINK (CRL) IS A 3.45KM TWIN TUNNEL UNDERGROUND RAIL LINK CONNECTING THE BRITOMART TRANSPORT CENTRE TO THE AUCKLAND RAIL NETWORK. IT INCLUDES A REDEVELOPED MT EDEN STATION AND TWO NEW UNDERGROUND STATIONS NEAR AOTEA SQUARE AND KARANGAHAPE ROAD. The CRL is part of an integrated transport Significant development is expected in all the and land-use plan for Auckland including station precincts as a result of the enhanced major investments in motorway, arterial roads transport provision. and rail upgrades. These investments have resulted in rapid rail patronage increases The CRL will also help achieve Government and averaging 18% year-on-year for 12 years. Council objectives for the economy, including housing provision, by enhancing access to the Auckland Transport (AT) is responsible for and Special Housing Areas and making affordable committed to providing a first-class, integrated housing in outer areas more viable through public transport network and the CRL is central effective transport access. to this goal. It will provide a massive step change in the rail system capacity and close a Auckland’s population is expected to grow significant gap in customer service levels, better rapidly from some 1.57 to 2.5 million people matching public transport demand and supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Link to Northport and Marsden Point
    Reference: 20180454 21 December 2018 s9(2)(a) Dear s9(2)(a) Thank you for your Official Information Act request, received on 2 November 2018. You requested the following: Communication associated with the KiwiRail upgrade in Northland and all activities associated with a rail link to Northport and Marsden Point. We clarified with your office that the request covers the time period from the 2017 General Election to the date of the request. The due date for the response to your request was extended to 21 December 2018. Information Being Released Please find enclosed the following documents: Item Date Document Description Decision 1. 8 November 2017 Ministry of Transport Briefing: Release in part Passenger Rail Networks in the Regions 2. 13 December 2017 Ministry of Transport Table: Rail Release in part projects that are possibly suitable for PGF Funding 3. 19 January 2018 Email: KiwiRail Options Release in part 4. 19 January 2018 Email: AH (draft content for FEC Release in part briefing) 5. 25 January 2018 Treasury Briefing: Meeting with Release in part Harrison Grierson and Silk Road Management Limited to Discuss Northland Rail and KiwiBuild 6. 26 March 2018 Ministry of Transport Rail A3 Release in part 7. 25 June 2018 Ministry of Transport Briefing - Release in part Meeting with KiwiRail about Marsden Point 8. 28 June 2018 KiwiRail Document - Agenda and Release in part Ministerial Briefing Northland Update 9. 4 September Email – Re: Marsden Release in part 2018 I have decided to release the relevant parts of the documents listed above,
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Level Crossing Grade Separation Feasibility Study
    Rail Level Crossing Grade Reference: 236852 Prepared for: Auckland Separation Feasibility Study Transport Final Report – Volume 1 Revision: 07 12 December 2014 Project 236852 File AT Level Crossing Report_V7.docx 12 December 2014 Revision 07 Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon New Zealand Limited Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road Newmarket Auckland 1023 PO Box 9762 Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand T +64 9 520 6019 F +64 9 524 7815 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Report title Final Report – Volume 1 Document ID Project number 236852 File path Client Auckland Transport Client contact Andrew Firth Rev Date Revision details/status Prepared by Author Verifier Approver 0 31 July 2013 Draft for AT to comment T Pang T Pang A Mein 1 30 August 2013 AT comments included T Pang T Pang L Beban A Mein 2 2 September 2013 Draft for AT to Review T Pang T Pang A Mein A Mein Final Pilot Report as Agreed by 3 3 November 2013 T Pang T Pang A Mein A Mein AT Draft Full Report for AT to J Atuluwage/ 4 11 February 2014 T Pang A Mein A Mein Comment T Pang 5 13 October 2014 Final Report T Pang T Pang A Mein A Mein T Pang/S 6 25 November 2014 Final Report T Pang A Mein A Mein Lalpe 7 12 December 2014 Final Report S Lalpe T Pang A Mein
    [Show full text]
  • North Shore City District Plan
    AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN OPERATIVE IN PART PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 38 (Private) 522 – 524 Swanson Road, Ranui SUMMARY OF DECISIONS REQUESTED Enclosed: • Explanation • Summary of Decisions Requested • Submissions Explanation • You may make a “further submission” to support or oppose any submission already received (see summaries that follow). • You should use Form 6. • Your further submission must be received by Thursday, 12th March 2020. • Send a copy of your further submission to the original submitter as soon as possible after submitting it to the Council. Summary of Decisions Requested Plan Change 38 - 522 - 524 Swanson Road Summary of Decisions Requested Sub Sub # Point Submitter Name Address for Service Theme Summary Seek amendment to add a concept plan that development is required to comply with a setback KiwiRail Holdings Limited (KiwiRail) of 5m along the southern boundary and southeast 1 1.1 Attn: Pam Butler [email protected] Seek amendment part of the site Seek adquate assessment of reverse sensitivy effects of rail noise and vibration, and insert KiwiRail Holdings Limited (KiwiRail) mitigation provisions to apply to any development 1 1.2 Attn: Pam Butler [email protected] Seek assessment and mitigation within 100m of the rail corridor boundary 2 2.1 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn 2 2.2 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn 2 2.3 Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn 1 of 1 Submissions # 1 22 January 2020 Auckland Council Level 24, 135 Albert Street Private Bag 92300 Auckland 1142 Attention: Planning Technician
    [Show full text]