Dendera and Abydos Day Tour from Hurghada
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible Has Never Told
Ghana Journal of Linguistics 9.1: 72-96 (2020) ______________________________________________________________________________ http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gjl.v9i1.4 EDITORIAL BOOK CRITIQUE: THE ORIGIN OF THE WORD AMEN: ANCIENT KNOWLEDGE THE BIBLE HAS NEVER TOLD Ọbádélé Bakari Kambon Editor-in-Chief Abstract: The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible has Never Told is a book that promises to pique the interest of any reader interested in classical Kmt ‘Black Nation/Land of the Blacks’, mdw nTr ‘Hieroglyphs,’ the Akan language, and historical-linguistic connections between the three. Specifically, the book promises to deliver information about how the word imn ‘Amen,’ as attested in classical Kmt ‘Black Nation/Land of the Blacks,’ persists in the contemporary Akan language. While under a steady hand this should be a simple enough thesis to substantiate, unfortunately, the authors’ obvious lack of grounding in historical linguistics, their lack of knowledge of mdw nTr ‘Hieroglyphs’ as well as their lack of understanding the morphology (word structure) of the Akan language all mar the analyses presented in the book. Keywords: Amen, Heru Narmer, historical linguistics, folk etymology Osei, O. K., Issa, J., & Faraji, S. (2020). The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible has Never Told. Long Beach, CA: Amen-Ra Theological Seminary Press. 1. Introduction In The Origin of the Word Amen: Ancient Knowledge the Bible has Never Told, what should be an open-and-shut case is saddled with a plethora of spurious look-alikes and folk etymologies prompted by attempts to analyze one language with another without actually having studying the language to be analyzed itself. -
Ancient Egyptian Chronology.Pdf
Ancient Egyptian Chronology HANDBOOK OF ORIENTAL STUDIES SECTION ONE THE NEAR AND MIDDLE EAST Ancient Near East Editor-in-Chief W. H. van Soldt Editors G. Beckman • C. Leitz • B. A. Levine P. Michalowski • P. Miglus Middle East R. S. O’Fahey • C. H. M. Versteegh VOLUME EIGHTY-THREE Ancient Egyptian Chronology Edited by Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2006 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ancient Egyptian chronology / edited by Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton; with the assistance of Marianne Eaton-Krauss. p. cm. — (Handbook of Oriental studies. Section 1, The Near and Middle East ; v. 83) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-90-04-11385-5 ISBN-10: 90-04-11385-1 1. Egypt—History—To 332 B.C.—Chronology. 2. Chronology, Egyptian. 3. Egypt—Antiquities. I. Hornung, Erik. II. Krauss, Rolf. III. Warburton, David. IV. Eaton-Krauss, Marianne. DT83.A6564 2006 932.002'02—dc22 2006049915 ISSN 0169-9423 ISBN-10 90 04 11385 1 ISBN-13 978 90 04 11385 5 © Copyright 2006 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. -
Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis
Answers Research Journal 4 (2011):127–159. www.answersingenesis.org/arj/v4/ancient-egyptian-chronology-genesis.pdf Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis Matt McClellan, [email protected] Abstract One of the most popular topics among young earth creationists and apologists is the relationship of the Bible with Ancient Egyptian chronology. Whether it concerns who the pharaoh of the Exodus was, the background of Joseph, or the identity of Shishak, many Christians (and non-Christians) have wondered how these two topics fit together. This paper deals with the question, “How does ancient Egyptian chronology correlate with the book of Genesis?” In answering this question it begins with an analysis of every Egyptian dynasty starting with the 12th Dynasty (this is where David Down places Moses) and goes back all the way to the so called “Dynasty 0.” After all the data is presented, this paper will look at the different possibilities that can be constructed concerning how long each of these dynasties lasted and how they relate to the biblical dates of the Great Flood, the Tower of Babel, and the Patriarchs. Keywords: Egypt, pharaoh, Patriarchs, chronology, Abraham, Joseph Introduction Kingdom) need to be revised. This is important During the past century some scholars have when considering the relationship between Egyptian proposed new ways of dating the events of ancient history and the Tower of Babel. The traditional dating history before c. 700 BC.1 In 1991 a book entitled of Ancient Egyptian chronology places its earliest Centuries of Darkness by Peter James and four of dynasties before the biblical dates of the Flood and his colleagues shook the very foundations of ancient confusion of the languages at Babel. -
Who's Who in Ancient Egypt
Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Available from Routledge worldwide: Who’s Who in Ancient Egypt Michael Rice Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East Gwendolyn Leick Who’s Who in Classical Mythology Michael Grant and John Hazel Who’s Who in World Politics Alan Palmer Who’s Who in Dickens Donald Hawes Who’s Who in Jewish History Joan Comay, new edition revised by Lavinia Cohn-Sherbok Who’s Who in Military History John Keegan and Andrew Wheatcroft Who’s Who in Nazi Germany Robert S.Wistrich Who’s Who in the New Testament Ronald Brownrigg Who’s Who in Non-Classical Mythology Egerton Sykes, new edition revised by Alan Kendall Who’s Who in the Old Testament Joan Comay Who’s Who in Russia since 1900 Martin McCauley Who’s Who in Shakespeare Peter Quennell and Hamish Johnson Who’s Who in World War Two Edited by John Keegan Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Michael Rice 0 London and New York First published 1999 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. © 1999 Michael Rice The right of Michael Rice to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. -
Analyses Concerning the Impossibility of Fixing a Date for Building the Great Pyramid of Khufu the Eruption
ANALYSES CONCERNING THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF FIXING A DATE FOR BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF KHUFU THE ERUPTION الجيزة تختار عيدها القومي يوم بناء هرم خوفو الجيزة ترجئ اﻻحتفال بعيدها القومي الجديد.. ولجنة من "اﻵثار" وجامعة القاهرة للتأكد من التاريخ الجيزة تلغى اﻻحتفال بعيدها القومى »الجديد« بعد هجوم اﻷثريين على تاريخ بناء الهرم ‘......good for amateurs' speculations’ Regardless of all the above said; THE MAGNIFECENCE OF THE GREAT PYRAMID OF KHUFU, IS AN IMPUTUS: FOR DEEPER RESEARCH SIMPLY By analyzing the procedure in the press releases we can see: Assuming that the building project started on the first day of the flood during year one of Khufu’s reign IS SPECULATION And from available chronologies a date for Khufu’s accession CAN NEVER BE PRECISE Accordingly the heliacal rising of Sirius, (of that year), was interpolated from astronomical data by adding 30 days the river rose on DATE = 23 AUGUST BP 4479 THIS IS A CONCLUSION BASED ON UNRELIABLE EVIDENCE CONSEQUENTLY, IN MY OPENION, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FIX A DATE FOR BUILDING THE GREAT PYRAMID OF KHUFU HOWEVER, I HAVE BEEN INFORMED THAT FURTHER RESEARCH IS UNDERWAY AIMING AT THE POSSIBILITY OF A DATE ARGUMENTS DID THE EGYPTIANS START BUILDING ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE FLOOD ? OR WERE THERE OTHER CONSIDERATIONS ? LET US REVIEW SOME HINTS ON THE GREAT PYRAMID MAGNIFISENCE It is logical to consider that a pyramid project is born with a DECISION followed by PREPARATIONS before starting. THE DECISION was made following a tradition of the royal ancestors and the capability to undertake But building the Great pyramid was more ambitious Pyramids built before king Snofru used small limestone blocks quarried locally and could be transported on donkey back At his Bent and Red pyramids building blocks became bigger and were possibly dragged on long sloping ramps. -
Clarity Chronology: Egypt's Chronology in Sync with the Holy Bible Eve Clarity, P1
Clarity Chronology: Egypt's chronology in sync with the Holy Bible Eve Clarity, p1 Clarity Chronology This Egyptian chronology is based upon the historically accurate facts in the Holy Bible which are supported by archaeological evidence and challenge many assumptions. A major breakthrough was recognizing Joseph and Moses lived during the reigns of several pharaohs, not just one. During the 18th dynasty in which Joseph and Moses lived, the average reign was about 15 years; and Joseph lived 110 years and Moses lived 120 years. The last third of Moses' life was during the 19th dynasty. Though Rameses II had a reign of 66 years, the average reign of the other pharaohs was only seven years. Biblical chronology is superior to traditional Egyptian chronology Joseph was born in 1745 BC during the reign of Tao II. Joseph was 17 when he was sold into slavery (1728 BC), which was during the reign of Ahmose I, for the historically accurate amount of 20 pieces of silver.1 Moses (1571-1451 BC) was born 250 years after the death of the Hebrew patriarch, Abraham. Moses lived in Egypt and wrote extensively about his conversations and interactions with the pharaoh of the Hebrews' exodus from Egypt; thus providing a primary source. The history of the Hebrews continued to be written by contemporaries for the next thousand years. These books (scrolls) were accurately copied and widely disseminated. The Dead Sea Scrolls contained 2,000 year old copies of every book of the Bible, except Esther, and the high accuracy of these copies to today's copies in original languages is truly astonishing. -
Pharaoh Chronology (Pdf)
Egypt's chronology in sync with the Holy Bible by Eve Engelbrite (c)2021, p1 Egypt's Chronology in Synchronization with the Bible This Egyptian chronology is based upon the historically accurate facts in the Holy Bible which are supported by archaeological evidence and challenge many assumptions. A major breakthrough was recognizing Joseph and Moses lived during the reigns of several pharaohs, not just one. During the 18th dynasty in which Joseph and Moses lived, the average reign was about 15 years; and Joseph lived 110 years and Moses lived 120 years. The last third of Moses' life was during the 19th dynasty. Though Rameses II had a reign of 66 years, the average reign of the other pharaohs was only seven years. Biblical chronology is superior to traditional Egyptian chronology Joseph was born in 1745 BC during the reign of Tao II. Joseph was 17 when he was sold into slavery (1728 BC), which was during the reign of Ahmose I, for the historically accurate amount of 20 pieces of silver.1 Moses (1571-1451 BC) was born 250 years after the death of the Hebrew patriarch, Abraham. Moses lived in Egypt and wrote extensively about his conversations and interactions with the pharaoh of the Hebrews' exodus from Egypt; thus providing a primary source. The history of the Hebrews continued to be written by contemporaries for the next thousand years. These books (scrolls) were accurately copied and widely disseminated. The Dead Sea Scrolls contained 2,000 year old copies of every book of the Bible, except Esther, and the high accuracy of these copies to today's copies in original languages is truly astonishing. -
In the Shadow of Osiris: Non-Royal Mortuary Landscapes at South
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 1-1-2014 In the Shadow of Osiris: Non-Royal Mortuary Landscapes at South Abydos During the Late Middle and New Kingdoms Kevin Michael Cahail University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the Islamic World and Near East History Commons Recommended Citation Cahail, Kevin Michael, "In the Shadow of Osiris: Non-Royal Mortuary Landscapes at South Abydos During the Late Middle and New Kingdoms" (2014). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1222. http://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1222 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1222 For more information, please contact [email protected]. In the Shadow of Osiris: Non-Royal Mortuary Landscapes at South Abydos During the Late Middle and New Kingdoms Abstract Kevin M. Cahail Dr. Josef W. Wegner The site of South Abydos was home to royal mortuary complexes of both the late Middle, and New Kingdoms, belonging to Senwosret III and Ahmose. Thanks to both recent and past excavations, both of these royal establishments are fairly well understood. Yet, we lack a clear picture of the mortuary practices of the non- royal individuals living and working in the shadow of these institutions. For both periods, the main question is where the tombs of the non-royal citizens might exist. Additionally for the Middle Kingdom is the related issue of how these people commemorated their dead ancestors. Divided into two parts, this dissertation looks at the ways in which non-royal individuals living at South Abydos during these two periods dealt with burial and funerary commemoration. -
Tessa Dickinson a Landscape and Materials-Based Approach to Royal Mortuary Architecture in Early Third Millennium BC Egypt Volum
Tessa Dickinson A Landscape and Materials-based Approach to Royal Mortuary Architecture in Early Third Millennium BC Egypt Volume 1: Text Institute of Archaeology University College London 2014 Thesis submitted to University College London for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Disclaimer I, Tessa Dickinson, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Tessa Dickinson 2 Abstract This dissertation examines the role that the building of royal mortuary complexes (RMC hereafter) played in the consolidation of the Egyptian state between the reigns of kings Khasekhemwy and Shepseskaf, c. 2,700-2,500 BC. The theoretical basis for this research is inspired by cross-cultural studies that demonstrate (a) that monuments are not only the after-effect of a centralised state system, but may themselves be integrative strategies that contribute more directly to a state’s formation and consolidation and (b) that a monument’s location and construction materials reflect both logistical and symbolic concerns with salient socio-political scope. The main analysis offered here consists of a sequential, monument-by-monument archaeological assessment of RMC location and construction materials with a particular emphasis on the role of a specialist workforce. This research combines both quantitative and qualitative methods that help flesh out possible logistical and symbolic implications associated with the decision- making process behind each RMC. The working and symbolic properties of a whole range of construction materials is determined via careful use of the limited contemporary, and more abundant later, Egyptian documentary sources, as well as demonstrable patterns of material use in the archaeological record. -
Abydos King List and Royal Canon of Turin List
Abydos king list and Royal canon of Turin list Written by Administrator Saturday, 01 May 2010 07:08 - Last Updated Monday, 17 May 2010 13:36 The Abydos King List in the Hall of Ancestors (Temple of Seti I) 1. Meni (established one) 2. Teti 3. Iti (the sovereign) 4. Ita (the sovereign vulture) 5. Djaty (two estates) 6. Mer-ba-pen 7. Semsem (priest of priests or Ptah priest) 8. Qebh (hawk headed god of the south) 1 / 65 Abydos king list and Royal canon of Turin list Written by Administrator Saturday, 01 May 2010 07:08 - Last Updated Monday, 17 May 2010 13:36 9. Mdw-ti-umer (staff, pestle and chisel) 10. Ka-kau (soul of bulls) 11. Khnum-netjer-n (sacred ram) 12. Uadj-nes 13. Sen-di or Sen-dji (feared one) 14. Dja-dja-tepy (the head chief) 15. Neb-ka (lord of the soul) 16. Djeser-za (sacred protection) 17. Teti 18. Z-djes (I am my own man) 19. Nefer-ka-re (good soul of Re) 20. Snefru 2 / 65 Abydos king list and Royal canon of Turin list Written by Administrator Saturday, 01 May 2010 07:08 - Last Updated Monday, 17 May 2010 13:36 21. Khufu 22. Djedef-re 23. Khaf-re 24. Men-kau-re 25. Shep-ses-kaf 26. User-kaf 27. Sahu-re 28. Kakai (Neferirkare) 29. Nefer-ef-re 30. Niuser-re (Ini) 31. Men-kau-hor (Kaiu) 3 / 65 Abydos king list and Royal canon of Turin list Written by Administrator Saturday, 01 May 2010 07:08 - Last Updated Monday, 17 May 2010 13:36 32. -
A Study of the King 'Menkauhor'/ the 5Th Dynasty Prof.Mofida El
Studies on the Arab World monuments 21 A Study of the King ‘Menkauhor’/ The 5th Dynasty Prof.Mofida El-Weshahy Dr. Noha Hany Abstract: This research is entitled as ‘A Study of the King ‘Menkauhor’; the seventh king of the 5th Dynasty of the Old Kingdom. The birth name of the king is Kaiu, and it is suggested that he has a burial pyramid at Dahshur. It could also be recommended that this king has no obvious relationship with that who preceded him in kingship; the king ‘Niuserre’. Menkauhor was also considered one of the kings of the 5th Dynasty who remarkably was buried outside the area of Abu Sir/Sakkara, although he has constructed a sun temple in Abu Ghurab. In spite of reigning shortly, that king’s monumental works had proved the remarkable improvements in the internal and external political conditions of the 5th Dynasty. The objectives of the research: This research aims to study and analyze the reigning period of the King ‘Menkauhor’ during the Old Kingdom. It aims to collect the published and unpublished representations of the king in the temples and tombs of Egypt in order to better understand his forms, titles and his relation with other kings and gods. It also aims to focus the light on the king’s ‘Menkauhor’ monuments and works. The research framework: The research framework is an artistic study, for tracing the scenes and monumental works of the King ‘Menkauhor’. The research type: The research is a combined study between both descriptive and analytical sides. Keywords: th Menkauhor, 5 Dynasty, Kaiu, Abu Ghurab. -
Ancient Egyptian Handout with Answers
Benjamin Daniels, Early Writing Systems, Berkeley Splash, 2018 I. Ancient Egyptian Painting of Nefertari, with her titles, from her tomb, QV66. New Kingdom, 19th Dynasty (ca. 1255 BCE) ḏd mdw in wsir ḥm.t nsw.t wr.t (nfr.t-iry mr.t n Mw.t)| m3‘.t ḫrw Words spoken by the Osiris, Great Wife of the King, Nefertari, beloved of (the goddess) Mut, True of Voice (deceased). Vocabulary: ḏd: spoken, mdw: words, in: by, wsir: Osiris, ḥm.t: wife, nsw.t: king, wr.t: great, nfr.t-iry: Nefertari, mr.t n: Beloved of, Mw.t: Mut (Goddess), m3‘.t: true, ḫrw: voice. 1 Benjamin Daniels, Early Writing Systems, Berkeley Splash, 2018 Statue of Nofret, with her titles, Old Kingdom, 4th Dynasty (ca. 2500 BCE) rḫ(.t) nsw.t nfr.t The acquaintance of the King, Nofret Remember honorific transposition god’s names (and here the king’s name) are often written first, even though they are pronounced last. rḫ(.t): a (female) acquaintance (She was the wife of the king’s brother) nsw.t: king nfr.t: Nofret (Neferet) 2 Benjamin Daniels, Early Writing Systems, Berkeley Splash, 2018 I. Uniliteral Signs (Sign, Transliteration (Manuel de Codage), Notes) “Aleph” “dotted h” 3 ḥ Vulture twisted lamp wick (A) (H) i “yod” ḫ “third h” unknown, reed leaf suggested that it (i) (x) might be a placenta 2 reed leafs, “fourth h” ẖ Diagonal strokes The udder of an y or (X) animal “ayin” 1) folded cloth Ꜥ s arm and hand 2) a door bolt (a) or (originally a separate “z” sound) “waw” “shin” š 1) Quail chick, a pool of water, w or 2) coil (S) sounds like “sh” lower leg and foot “qoph” b ḳ a hill (q) stool a wicker basket p k horned viper a pottery stand with f g a pot on it 1) owl “t-loaf” m t 2) ? a loaf of bread “feminine ending” or 1) water “second t” 2) Red Crown of ṯ a rope hobble for n Lower Egypt animals, sounds like (T) “tj” or “tch” or “of” mouth a hand r d A reed shelter or “second d” ḏ courtyard seen from a cobra, h above (D) sounds like “dj” 3 Benjamin Daniels, Early Writing Systems, Berkeley Splash, 2018 II.