7 LPR Appendix 1 Summary of Issues

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

7 LPR Appendix 1 Summary of Issues Appendix 1 South Somerset Local Plan Review 2016 – 2036 – Main Points arising from Issues and Options Consultation October 2017 until January 2018. During the consultation period, the Council received over 800 representations to the Local Plan Review Issues and Options consultation resulting in 1,424 individual comments, many of which are very detailed and lengthy in nature. 49 late responses were also received. What follows below is a summary of the main points made by respondents, including the late representations. All of the representations received during the consultation period can be found in full on the Council’s website at Homepage - South Somerset District Council Consultations Question/ Question / Summary of Main Points Officer Response Option Option / No Section of the document Foreword There have been several questions as to why the Local Plan is being The Council agreed to carry out a reviewed so soon after adoption of the current Local Plan. It is suggested full Local Plan Review in the Local that as the current Local Plan was only adopted in 2015 the new plan Development Scheme, April 2017. should utilise an evidence base from 2016 and the plan period run up to The National Planning Policy 2036. Framework, July 2018 (NPPF) There are also queries as to why so much new housing is required. expects Local Plan to be reviewed It is also felt that the consultation document and Foreword make no mention with five years of the date of of Neighbourhood Plans - the Government’s main initiative. adoption. The Foreword to the Local Plan Review will include a reference to Neighbourhood Plans. Sustainability It is asked why, when the 2017 HELAA identifies the site (E/MIPO/0003) as The Council has commissioned Appraisal having capacity for approx. 68 dwellings and concludes that it is suitable, consultants AECOM to carry out available, and achievable for development in the next five years, the site Sustainability Appraisal of the Local was discounted from the Sustainability Appraisal or I&O consultation and Plan Review. there is an objection to what is seen as to lack of reasonable alternatives for Milborne Port. Site options for Milborne Port are It is stated that, without site visits and a lack of qualitative analysis of sites, discussed later in this Appendix. there are a number of inherent flaws in the site appraisal criteria, leading to 1 Question/ Question / Summary of Main Points Officer Response Option Option / No Section of the document some distorted findings, examples of which are given, particularly in relation to sites at Milborne Port It is thought that 8.2(b) and (c) are preferred, which is supported by Option 2 of the SA - Option 2 being to have a more dispersed strategy based upon where the market is delivering. Duty to The Consultation Document is said to pay little attention to the duty to As well as joint studies there are Cooperate cooperate and that simply commissioning joint studies across local authority regular meetings with adjoin boundaries is not sufficient. authorities and contact with specific bodies. A duty to co-operate report will accompany the Local Plan at the Submission stage. The NPPF now requires Councils to produce and maintain one or more Statements of Common Ground documenting cross-boundary matters being addressed and progress on cooperating on these. SSDC will be complying with this requirement. Spatial Portrait This is generally supported, but it is stated that poor economic outlook and The Local Plan Review seeks to of South skills attainment needs to be addressed; that the Yeovil Vision needs to re- provide a planning policy framework Somerset imagine the town centre; and that more mention should be made of electric that supports the Councils cars. regeneration objectives for Yeovil It stated that that the Plan must accommodate demographic change to meet Town Centre, helps to promote a the needs of ageing population, that there needs to be more provision for healthy economy, aligned to the the elderly, including bungalows and care/ nursing homes; and that the loss Councils emerging Economic of younger people that may be due to lack of suitable employment Development Strategy and which opportunities should be included. supports the provision of 2 Question/ Question / Summary of Main Points Officer Response Option Option / No Section of the document It is thought that protection of Grade 1 & 2 agricultural land is essential and infrastructure for electric vehicles vital for a sustainable future, particularly in our rural area with agriculture (see Policy EQ1) being such a dominant local industry on which many depend for their employment. The Local Plan Review recognises It is stated that the planned improvements to the A303 have yet to be the role agri-based business play in funded, are already out of date and will not provide the relief needed. The the South Somerset economy. point is made, however, that any excavated material during the A303 and Footnote 53 of the NPPF states A358 works should be used on site - the principle of ‘lean design’ should be “Where significant development of adopted. Waste and recycling infrastructure should consider as a cross- agricultural land is demonstrated to border matter with TDBC. be necessary, areas of poorer It is suggested that reference should be made to the convenience of buses quality land should be preferred to being a vital consideration for rural residents since they provide access to those of higher quality.” It is their employment, leisure, medical and commercial needs. All allocations will recognised that South Somerset has result in increased car journeys and traffic due to lack of public transport. a significant amount of high quality It is thought misleading to say South Somerset is well linked by three major agricultural land any loss has to be railway lines. South Somerset is not well served by railways. There are only balanced against the need to stations at Yeovil, Crewkerne, Templecombe, Bruton and Castle Cary. A provide land for housing and number of other Market Towns are not served. employment growth to meet needs Evidence from the National Housing Federation’s Home Truths is quoted of the current and future population which indicates that South Somerset is becoming one of the most of South Somerset. unaffordable places to live in the South West, with a house price to income ratio of 10.0. The importance of buses is Fuller reference to AONBs is encouraged, with potential for greater policy recognised. Additional text has been integration, particularly as the Blackdown Hills AONB Management Plan will inserted to set out the contribution shortly be reviewed. Reference is also made to the Cranborne Chase AONB the community and voluntary sector Management Plan. make to connectivity for There is an objection to the loss of employment land to residential. communities. It stated that the economic benefits brought by the tourism and leisure The “well” has been deleted where sectors should be given more emphasis, particularly given that these will be referring to the railway stations. strengthened by the planned improvements to the A303 and A358. 3 Question/ Question / Summary of Main Points Officer Response Option Option / No Section of the document The Office of National Statistic identifies an affordability ratio of 8.16 for South Somerset (2017). A reference to AONB Management Plans has been inserted. Permitted Development Rights allows B1 employment use premises to convert to residential use without the need for planning permission. The Governments focus is the delivery of new housing. The provision of employment land is discussed in more detail later in this schedule and includes Policy EP2 which seeks to resist the loss of employment sites and buildings. A reference to tourism expenditure and the opportunities present by the A303 and A358 improvements has been inserted. General Points Several comments have been received complaining about an apparent lack The Local Plan Issues and Options of or inadequate consultation. were consulted upon for a 12 week It is stated that not enough consideration has been given to minerals and period. A number of ‘drop-in’ waste matters – and that there is a need to amend the definition of sessions were held across the development plan to include reference to the adopted plans. The need to District. All documents were safeguard building stone resources and promote use of local vernacular available in libraries Council Offices stone is highlighted. and online. 4 Question/ Question / Summary of Main Points Officer Response Option Option / No Section of the document The consultation was carried out in accordance with the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement, 2015 (and updated in 2018 to include more detail on neighbourhood Planning). Somerset County Council is the Minerals and Waste Authority and produces a development plan document on these matters. 3.1 Do you agree Some people agree with the suggested Vision saying, for example that the current Various amendments have been with the vision to 2028 is outdated and too long winded and the proposed vision is succinct, made to the proposed Vision in suggested memorable, and provides an acceptable solution. However, there have also been order to reflect the comments made vision to 2034, many in disagreement and suggestions made for its revision, which include the including the addition of: and, if not, following: how should it ‘healthy’ in the first sentence. be changed? Employment/ Economy It needs to be more aspirational in terms of providing jobs growth and A second sentence reflecting the economic prosperity. Council Plan. It include a reference to supporting the tourism industry and tourist accommodation, stated as key contributors to the local economy and a major Infrastructure of all types’ and source of local income and employment. ‘improved’ to the now third sentence.
Recommended publications
  • Sherborne Rural 13.Pub
    Electoral Division Profile 2013 West Dorset Sherborne Rural Electoral Division Total Population: 9,340 (2011 Mid Year Estimate, DCC) Number of Electors: 7,852 (Dec 2012, WDDC) Sherborne Rural Electoral Division is composed of the following parishes: Trent, Sandford Orcas, Oborne, Poyntington, Goathill, Purse Caundle, Haydon, Caundle Marsh, Bishop’s Caundle, Holwell, Folke, North Wootton, Castleton, Over Compton, Nether Compton, Longburton, Leweston, Lillington, Holnest, Leigh, Chetnole, Stockwood, Yetminster, Ryme Intrinsica, Beer Hackett, Thornford, Clifton Maybank, Bradford Abbas, Hermitage, Hilfield, Batcombe, Melbury Bubb, Melbury Sampford, Evershot, Melbury Osmond, East Chelborough, West Chelborough, Corsecombe and Halstock. Within the division there is no library (the nearest is in Sherborne) and 6 schools (all primary). Population Sherborne Rural Dorset 2011 Mid-Year Population Estimates, ONS & DCC West Dorset Electoral (DCC) Division All 9,340 99,260 412,910 % aged 0-15 years 15.1% 15.8% 16.3% % aged 16-64 years 57.5% 57.7% 58.5% % aged 65-84 years 24.1% 22.3% 21.3% % aged 85+ years 3.3% 4.2% 3.9% Sherborne Rural division has a total population of 9,340. Sherborne Rural Electoral Division, The age profile in the division is slightly older than the County average, 27.4% are aged 65+ years. The proportion of people aged 85+ is slightly below average (3.3% compared to 3.9%). PAGE 1 Ethnicity/Country of Birth Sherborne Rural West Dorset Census, 2011 Electoral Dorset (DCC) Division % white British 96.5 95.7 95.5 % Black and minority ethnic groups (BME) 3.5 4.3 4.5 % England 90.9 91.3 91.0 % born rest of UK 3.3 3.1 3.4 % Rep of IRE 0.3 0.4 0.4 % EU (member countries in 2001) 1.3 1.2 1.3 % EU (Accession countries April 2001 to March 2011) 0.5 0.5 0.7 % born elsewhere 3.6 3.4 3.1 96.5% of the division’s population are white British, just above then County average (95.5%).
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Changes) Order 2002
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2002 No. 2370 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The District of West Dorset (Electoral Changes) Order 2002 Made - - - - - 11th September 2002 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(a), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(b), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(c) a report dated April 2002 on its review of the district of West Dorset together with its recommendations: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give eVect to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(d) and 26(e) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the District of West Dorset (Electoral Changes) Order 2002. (2) This Order shall come into force— (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on 1st May 2003, on 15th October 2002; (b) for all other purposes, on 1st May 2003. Interpretation 2. In this Order— “district” means the district of West Dorset; “existing”, in relation to a ward, means the ward as it exists on the date this Order is made; and (a) The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, established by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 14 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planning & Environment Committee
    The Planning & Environment Committee MILBORNE PORT PARISH COUNCIL The Minutes of the Planning & Environment Committee meeting held via Zoom video conference on: Tuesday 19th January 2021 @ 6:45pm Present: Councillors: Mr T. Carty (Vice-Chairman), Cllr. L MacArthur, Cllr. R. Lockey In attendance: Miss N Hetherington – Deputy Parish Clerk/Committee Officer, Cllr. S Dyke (SSDC), Cllr. W Wallace (SSC), Cllr. T Watts Public Question and Comment Time: No members of the public attended. Cllr. Carty called on Cllrs. Dyke and Wallace for any updates: Cllr. Dyke explained that an application which had been submitted to Dorset County Council last year relating to an address at Goathill Farm had been made in error and has been withdrawn, pending re-submission to Dorset and to South Somerset, as the proposed site for the development crosses the county boundaries. Cllr. Wallace reported that the work of Somerset County Council area committees, including county and district planning committees, has been impacted upon by staff redeployment to the Covid-19 response and the vaccine roll-out, thus delaying responses to planning applications and impacting upon the democratic process and the ability to call on experts as part of that process; Cllr. Dyke noted that this situation should only last for a further 2 months. Cllr. Carty reminded members and those in attendance of the 3 current applications concerning Milborne Port that are most in contention whose outcomes might be affected by these delays: Station Road development; sewing room application at Newtown (Cllr. Dyke reported that this has been withdrawn and will be resubmitted); caravan park at White House Farm, currently on hold due to phosphate issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Beacon Ward Beaminster Ward
    As at 21 June 2019 For 2 May 2019 Elections Electorate Postal No. No. Percentage Polling District Parish Parliamentary Voters assigned voted at Turnout Comments and suggestions Polling Station Code and Name (Parish Ward) Constituency to station station Initial Consultation ARO Comments received ARO comments and proposals BEACON WARD Ashmore Village Hall, Ashmore BEC1 - Ashmore Ashmore North Dorset 159 23 134 43 32.1% Current arrangements adequate – no changes proposed Melbury Abbas and Cann Village BEC2 - Cann Cann North Dorset 433 102 539 150 27.8% Current arrangements adequate – no changes proposed Hall, Melbury Abbas BEC13 - Melbury Melbury Abbas North Dorset 253 46 Abbas Fontmell Magna Village Hall, BEC3 - Compton Compton Abbas North Dorset 182 30 812 318 39.2% Current arrangements adequate – no Fontmell Magna Abbas changes proposed BEC4 - East East Orchard North Dorset 118 32 Orchard BEC6 - Fontmell Fontmell Magna North Dorset 595 86 Magna BEC12 - Margaret Margaret Marsh North Dorset 31 8 Marsh BEC17 - West West Orchard North Dorset 59 6 Orchard East Stour Village Hall, Back Street, BEC5 - Fifehead Fifehead Magdalen North Dorset 86 14 76 21 27.6% This building is also used for Gillingham Current arrangements adequate – no East Stour Magdalen ward changes proposed Manston Village Hall, Manston BEC7 - Hammoon Hammoon North Dorset 37 3 165 53 32.1% Current arrangements adequate – no changes proposed BEC11 - Manston Manston North Dorset 165 34 Shroton Village Hall, Main Street, BEC8 - Iwerne Iwerne Courtney North Dorset 345 56 281 119
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook for IPUMS Great Britain 1851-1881 Linked Dataset
    Codebook for IPUMS Great Britain 1851-1881 linked dataset 1 Contents SAMPLE: Sample identifier 12 SERIAL: Household index number 12 SEQ: Index to distinguish between copies of households with multiple primary links 12 PERNUM: Person index within household 13 LINKTYPE: Link type 13 LINKWT: Number of cases in linkable population represented by linked case 13 NAMELAST: Last name 13 NAMEFRST: First name 13 AGE: Age 14 AGEMONTH: Age in months 14 BPLCNTRY: Country of birth 14 BPLCTYGB: County of birth, Britain 20 CFU: CFU index number 22 CFUSIZE: Number of people in individuals CFU 23 CNTRY: Country of residence 23 CNTRYGB: Country within Great Britain 24 COUNTYGB: County, Britain 24 ELDCH: Age of eldest own child in household 27 FAMSIZE: Number of own family members in household 27 FAMUNIT: Family unit membership 28 FARM: Farm, NAPP definition 29 GQ: Group quarters 30 HEADLOC: Location of head in household 31 2 HHWT: Household weight 31 INACTVGB: Adjunct occupational code (Inactive), Britain 31 LABFORCE: Labor force participation 51 MARRYDAU: Number of married female off-spring in household 51 MARRYSON: Number of married male off-spring in household 51 MARST: Marital status 52 MIGRANT: Migration status 52 MOMLOC: Mothers location in household 52 NATIVITY: Nativity 53 NCHILD: Number of own children in household 53 NCHLT10: Number of own children under age 10 in household 53 NCHLT5: Number of own children under age 5 in household 54 NCOUPLES: Number of married couples in household 54 NFAMS: Number of families in household 54 NFATHERS: Number of fathers
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Mineral Plan - Mailing List
    Somerset Mineral Plan - Mailing list JOB TITLE/INDIVIDUAL COMPANY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPTON PAUNCEFOOT & BLACKFORD PARISH INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL BICKNOLLER PROJECT INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL Planning Policy & Research North Somerset Council Bickenhall House INDIVIDUAL RSPB (SW) Wells Cathedral Stonemasons Ltd INDIVIDUAL ASSET MANAGER NEW EARTH SOLUTIONS INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL Dorset County Council INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL Blackdown Hills Business Association INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL John Wainwright And Co Ltd Chard Chamber Of Commerce Geologist Crewkerne Chamber Of Commerce INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL MENDIP POWER GROUP Institute Of Historic Building Conservation INDIVIDUAL SUSTAINABLE SHAPWICK FAITHNET SOUTH WEST INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL HALLAM LAND MANAGEMENT Mendip SOUTH PETHERTON Wellington Chamber Of Commerce INDIVIDUAL CANFORD RENEWABLE ENERGY INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL Eclipse Property Investments Ltd MAY GURNEY CHEDDAR PARISH COUNCIL SOMERSET WILDLIFE TRUST Mendip PILTON PARISH COUNCIL Hanson Aggregates INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR GENERAL THE CONFEDERATION OF UK COAL PRODUCERS DIRECTOR GENERAL CONFEDERATION OF UK COAL PRODUCERS (COALPRO) Ecologist Somerset Drainage Boards Consortium SOMERSET DRAINAGE BOARD INDIVIDUAL AXBRIDGE TOWN COUNCIL WELLS ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION GROUP INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL Senior Planning Officer - Minerals And Waste Policy Gloucestershire County Council Minerals Review Group INDIVIDUAL Shepton Mallet Town Council INDIVIDUAL MEARE
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Dorset Council, 21/11/2019 18:30
    Public Document Pack Council Date: Thursday, 21 November 2019 Time: 6.30 pm Venue: Council Chamber, County Hall, Dorchester, DT1 1XJ Membership: (Quorum 21) The Council membership is listed on the following page. Chief Executive: Matt Prosser, South Walks House, South Walks Road, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 1UZ (Sat Nav DT1 1EE) For more information about this agenda please telephone Democratic Services on 01305 252216 - email [email protected] For easy access to the Council agendas and minutes download the free public app Mod.gov for use on your iPad, Android and Windows tablet. Once downloaded select Dorset Council. Members of the public are welcome to attend this meeting with the exception of any items listed in the exempt part of this agenda. Please note that if you attend a committee meeting and are invited to make oral representations your name, together with a summary of your comments will be recorded in the minutes of the meeting. Please refer to the guide to public participation at committee meetings for more information about speaking at meetings. There is a hearing loop induction system available for public use. Recording, photographing and using social media at meetings Dorset Council is committed to being open and transparent in the way it carries out its business whenever possible. Anyone can film, audio-record, take photographs, and use social media such as tweeting and blogging to report the meeting when it is open to the public, so long as they conform to the Protocol for filming and audio recording of public
    [Show full text]
  • Pages 46-51 from Dorset Limekilns a First Survey
    46 Dorset Limekilns Appendix I. Limekiln Sites: map evidence and survival PARISH PARISH Limekiln Grid R ef CM ·-M0 ' Limekiln Grid Ref "'M CM :;~ ' ·-M0 ' c="' ."".::: 0\ c- .. = 0 ""~ ·;: ~ ""~c- ~ .. 0 c.. ;;"' ·;;:>"' > ... ~ 'E = :::1 "' ABBOTSBURY "' CAUNDLE MARSH I Abbotsbury SY57438606 ChL OL 6.5 45 Pleck Cottages ST68251287 Cb OL X 2 Berry Knap SY59148295 Cb OL 5.4 B CERNEABBAS 3 " Bishop's" SY58798588 ChL OL 2.2 Dl 46 CemeAbbas ST66850164 ChM L 6.4 4 Rodden Ridge SY60938321 Cb OL 2.3 B CHALDON HERRING ASKERSWELL 47 Chaldon Down SY78458165 ChU OL 3.2 B Eggardon Hill SY53509507 ChL OL X 48 Chaldon Herring SY79738339 ChU L 6.4 BEAMINSTER 49 Chideock Farm SY79778145 ChU OL 6.4 .- 6 Barrowfteld Farm ST46750150 lo L X 50 West Chaldon SY77908301 ChL L 5.4 7 Buckham Down E ST48500324 ChL L 6.5 CHARMOUTH 8 Buckham Down W ST48480333 ChL L 6.5 51 Charmouth I SY36429304 Lias L 5.3 C? 9 Chapel Marsh ST48440393 ChL OL 6.5 52 Charmouth 2 SY36429304 Lias M X 10 Cockroad Lane ST46910189 lo OL X 53 Charmouth East cSY367930 Lias x X 11 Coombe Dow n Hill ST48739985 Io OL 4.5 C HICKERELL 12 Higher Langdon ST 50750257 ChL OL 6.5 54 Chickerell SY64448095 Cb OL 4.3 B 13 Mapperton Farm SY49159955 lo OL X 55 Church SY64328078 Cb OL X 14 White Sheet Hill ST49300243 ChL OL 6.5 56 East Chickerell SY65458075 Cb OL 4.4 A BERE REGIS 57 Fleet Lodge SY6407805 1 Cb OL 6.5 15 Cow Drove SY85399501 ChU L X 58 Lower Ridge C lose cSY64108246 Cb X X BINCOMBE 59 Middle Farm SY64368253 Cb L 2.3 Bl 16 Coombe Valley SY69338372 PIP L X 60 Putton Farm SY65288058 Cb OL X BISHOPS
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset Data Book 2011 Data and Statistics for the County of Dorset
    Dorset Data Book 2011 Data and statistics for the county of Dorset Dorset County Council Enabling communities in Dorset to thrive now and for the future 2 Published Sources, Contacts and Conversion Figures Dorset Data Book 2011 Dorset Data Book 2011 3 Published Sources Conversion figures Research & Information Contacts in Surrounding Authorities Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) Bournemouth Borough Council Agricultural statistics for England and Wales. www.bournemouth.gov.uk Email: [email protected] Land Registry Quarterly House Price Bulletins, 01202 454684 based on sales. House Price Index. Town Hall Annexe St. Stephens Road Office for National Statistics Bournemouth BH26 6EA Business Demography 2009 Census of Population, 1971, 1981, 1991 Devon County Council and 2001. County Reports - Dorset and Hampshire Email : [email protected] Housing Tables 01392 382001 Availability of Cars Corporate Information Services 2010 based Sub-National Population Devon County Council Projections for England. County Hall Registrar General’s Mid-Year Estimates Topsham Road of Population Vital Statistics, births and deaths Exeter. EX2 4QD Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings 2010. Monthly Claimant Unemployment Hampshire County Council Statistics 2000 onwards. www.hants.gov.uk/factsandfigures/ Business Register and Employment [email protected] Survey 2009. Inter-Departmental Business Register 01962 846762 (IDBR) 2010. Research & Intelligence Group Environment Department Ordnance Survey, 1992 Hampshire County
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Dorset Council
    Public Document Pack People and Health Overview Committee Date: Tuesday, 27 October 2020 Time: 10.00 am Venue: To be held as a Teams Live Event Membership: (Quorum 3) Andrew Kerby (Chairman), Pauline Batstone (Vice-Chairman), Tony Alford, Pete Barrow, Toni Coombs, Ryan Holloway, Stella Jones, Rebecca Knox, Robin Legg and Daryl Turner Chief Executive: Matt Prosser, South Walks House, South Walks Road, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 1UZ (Sat Nav DT1 1EE) For more information about this agenda please telephone Helen Whitby on 01305 224187 or email [email protected] For easy access to the Council agendas and minutes download the free public app Mod.gov for use on your iPad, Android and Windows tablet. Once downloaded select Dorset Council. Due to the current coronavirus pandemic the Council has reviewed its approach to holding committee meetings. Members of the public are welcome to attend this meeting and listen to the debate either online by using the following link insert Please click here to view the live stream of the meeting. Members of the public wishing to view the meeting from an iphone, ipad or android phone will need to download the free Microsoft Team App to sign in as a Guest, it is advised to do this at least 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting. Please note that public speaking has been suspended. However Public Participation will continue by written submission only. Please see detail set out below. Dorset Council is committed to being open and transparent in the way it carries out its business whenever possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset Council Electoral Ward Mapping Submission
    Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Local Government Boundary Commission for England Dorset Council Electoral Ward Mapping Submission Submission on behalf of Dorset Area Joint Committee – May 2018 2 Contents Background……………………………………………………….……..……………………. 3 Purpose of this document……………………………...……………………………… 3 Methodology and Scope of the Warding Review ………….……………….. 3 Member Engagement Roadshows …………………………….…………………… 4 Summary and Recommendation …………………………………………………… 5 Annex 1 – Wider Statistical Area Map …………………………………….. 6 Annex 2 – Consultation Documents ……………………………………….. 7 (Maps and Polling District Forecasts) Annex 3 – Consultation Feedback with appendices A-G …………. 24 Annex 4 – Final Proposal for Electoral Wards …………………………. 49 (Map and supporting information) 3 Background 1. The Task and Finish Group on Boundary Review was established by the Dorset Area Joint Committee to review the electoral arrangements for the Dorset area in anticipation of the agreement of the Structural Change Order to create two new unitary councils for Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole. The Group formed a submission based on a fall-back position and council size, which was submitted by the Joint Committee to the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) in January 2018. Purpose of this report 2.1 The Task and Finish Group carried out a review of the electoral arrangements, in accordance with the timetable agreed with MHCLG. A principal objective of the review is that each electoral ward will be served, where possible, by a single councillor. In urban areas, it is accepted, however, that this may not be possible, where it may be more appropriate to elect two or three councillors. 2.2 Fall-back warding arrangements have been approved by the Dorset Area Joint Committee for inclusion within the Structural Change Order.
    [Show full text]
  • Licence Annex B: Provisions Relating to Licensed Actions on Or Around Special Areas of Conservation
    Licence Annex B: Provisions relating to licensed actions on or around Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), and/or Ramsar sites within the county of Dorset SSSI name European Designated Site Licence condition name (where applicable) Abbotsbury Blind No additional conditions imposed. Lane Abbotsbury All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Castle Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint. Arne Dorset Heathlands Avoid all intertidal, saltmarsh and beach habitats at Ramsar; Dorset all times. Heathlands SPA; Dorset Heaths (Purbeck & Operations conducted under this licence must Wareham) & Studland comply with existing legal obligations described in Dunes SAC; Dorset Heaths Note Y. No licensed operations 1st April to 31st SAC; Poole Harbour August, inclusive. Ramsar; Poole Harbour SPA During the period 1st September to 31st March inclusive: no licensed operations within 200 metres of all intertidal, saltmarsh and beach habitats, and all large waterbodies, including Little Sea; no licensed operations on fen, reedbed, or grazing marsh habitats. Do not disturb large flocks of waterbirds. No access to Stoborough and Creech Heaths SSSI 1st September to 30th April, inclusive. Before commencing licensed activities each season, operators must confirm with Natural England and the owner/occupier the location of any further communal roost locations supporting significant numbers of Hen Harrier or Merlin. Except on existing roads and tracks, there shall be no access within 500 metres of any such locations from 1st September to 30th April, inclusive. All vehicles must be restricted to existing tracks. Limit location of traps to existing sett footprint.
    [Show full text]