DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pacific Motorway Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pacific Motorway Report Report of the Queensland Ombudsman The Pacific Motorway Report An investigation into the actions of the Department of Main Roads in relation to noise and safety issues concerning the Pacific Motorway. March 2007 Report of the Queensland Ombudsman The Pacific Motorway Report An investigation into the actions of the Department of Main Roads in relation to noise and safety issues concerning the Pacific Motorway March 2007 © Queensland Ombudsman, 2007 Apart from any fair dealing for purposes related to the functions of the Ombudsman or the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this document may be reproduced by any process without permission. Inquiries should be made to the publishers, Queensland Ombudsman. ISBN 978-0-9758442-9-8 Queensland Ombudsman Level 25, 288 Edward Street Brisbane Qld 4000 GPO Box 3314 Brisbane Qld 4001 Tel: (07) 3005 7000 Fax: (07) 3005 7067 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ombudsman.qld.gov.au 6 March 2007 The Honourable John English MP Acting Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Parliament House George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 Dear Mr English In accordance with s.52 of the Ombudsman Act 2001, I hereby furnish to you my report, The Pacific Motorway Report: An investigation into the actions of the Department of Main Roads in relation to noise and safety issues concerning the Pacific Motorway. Yours faithfully David Bevan Queensland Ombudsman Enc Foreword Every year my Office receives thousands of complaints from Queenslanders about Queensland public sector agencies. Some complaints go beyond the circumstances of individual complainants and may best be described as ‘systemic’ complaints because the actions of the agency may affect many people. This is a report of such a case. Following a Queensland Government public announcement on 15 April 1996, the Department of Main Roads upgraded the Pacific Highway between the Logan Motorway and Nerang to motorway standard. The new motorway was opened to traffic in October 2000. This report presents the findings of an investigation into complaints lodged with my Office by two executive members of a community group known as the Residents Against Increased Noise (RAIN). RAIN claims to represent many people living adjacent to the Pacific Motorway. The complaints concern the administrative actions of the Department of Main Roads in upgrading the Pacific Motorway, particularly its decision to construct some sections of the pavement with concrete rather than asphalt. The decision to use concrete has caused RAIN members to be concerned about the effects of noise on their everyday lives and to express safety concerns for the motoring public in terms of the potential for aquaplaning on the concrete surface and poor visibility in wet weather conditions. Because the issues dealt with in the report are of significant public interest, I have decided to present the report to the Speaker for tabling in the Legislative Assembly as provided for in s.52 of the Ombudsman Act 2001. I take this opportunity to thank the executive members of RAIN who complained to my Office, and the RAIN membership, for their patience and cooperation during the conduct of this investigation. Likewise, I extend my appreciation to the Department of Main Roads, which has cooperated fully with my Office’s investigation. Finally, I would like to thank (now former) Deputy Ombudsman Rodney Metcalfe, Assistant Ombudsman Craig Allen and Investigating Officer Ed Perry for their dedication and professionalism in conducting the investigation and preparing this report. David Bevan Queensland Ombudsman v Table of contents Table of Contents Abbreviations and Dictionary ...............................................................................................x Executive Summary ............................................................................................................xiii Investigative context...........................................................................................................xiii The circumstances ............................................................................................................ xiv Role of Ombudsman .......................................................................................................... xv De-identification.................................................................................................................. xv The investigation ................................................................................................................ xv Public report ...................................................................................................................... xvi Outcome of investigation................................................................................................... xvi Maladministration .............................................................................................................xviii Opinions ............................................................................................................................ xix Recommendations ............................................................................................................ xxi Chapter 1: Background.....................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................1 1.2 Events leading to construction of concrete pavement on motorway.........................1 1.3 Allegations made to Ombudsman ............................................................................2 1.4 Issues for investigation .............................................................................................4 1.5 Jurisdiction................................................................................................................4 1.6 DMR response to investigation of complaints...........................................................5 1.7 Procedural fairness...................................................................................................5 Chapter 2: Regulatory framework and DMR’s noise standards....................................7 2.1 Transport Infrastructure Act 1994.............................................................................7 2.2 State Development and Public Works Organisation Act 1971..................................8 2.3 Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 1997 .........................................................9 2.4 DMR Noise Guidelines ...........................................................................................12 2.4.1 Interim Noise Guidelines.................................................................................12 2.4.2 Noise Code .....................................................................................................13 2.5 Comparison of interstate road noise standards......................................................15 2.6 Appropriateness of noise levels in EP Noise Policy and DMR Noise Code ...........16 2.6.1 EP Noise Policy ..............................................................................................16 2.6.2 DMR Noise Code............................................................................................17 Chapter 3: IMP public consultation process.................................................................22 3.1 Community consultation program...........................................................................22 3.2 Information dissemination.......................................................................................23 3.3 Analysis of the public consultation process for IMP................................................24 vii The Pacific Motorway Report Chapter 4: 1996 baseline noise levels and supplementary noise modelling.............26 4.1 Technical Paper No. 6 Noise Monitoring ................................................................26 4.2 Technical Paper No. 13 Noise Assessment ...........................................................26 4.3 1997-98 supplementary noise modelling project ....................................................28 Chapter 5: DMR decision-making for PCC pavement ..................................................29 5.1 Overview.................................................................................................................29 5.2 The Wallace Review Team Report.........................................................................30 5.3 Briefing note to Director-General............................................................................31 5.4 Decision-making authority of Board of Review.......................................................31 5.5 Consideration by Board of Review .........................................................................32 5.6 DMR decision to use PCC......................................................................................32 5.6.1 Decisions on location for pavement types ......................................................32 5.6.2 Record keeping and reasons for decisions.....................................................35 5.6.3 Reasons subsequently provided by DMR for pavement selection..................37 5.7 Constructed PCC pavement characteristics...........................................................37 Chapter 6: Post-construction noise monitoring...........................................................39 6.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’S Guide
    New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide Important: This Operator’s Guide is for three Notices separated by Part A, Part B and Part C. Please read sections carefully as separate conditions may apply. For enquiries about roads and restrictions listed in this document please contact Transport for NSW Road Access unit: [email protected] 27 October 2020 New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide Contents Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 NSW Travel Zones .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Part A – NSW Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicles Notice ................................................................................................ 9 About the Notice ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 1: Travel Conditions ................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Pilot and Escort Requirements ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Government Gazette
    Queensland Government Gazette PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 377] Friday 16 March 2018 Gazette Closing times for the Easter Period Calendar .BSDIoApril 2 .BSDI Monday 5VFTEBZ8FEOFTEBZ 5IVSTEBZ 'SJEBZ Appointments (B[FUUF (PPE'SJEBZ BOE Pther HB[FUUF SFMFBTFE 1VCMJD)PMJEBZ Ootices UPCFTVCNJUUFE PO5IVSTEBZ CZ5VFTEBZ12 noon BGUFSOPPO Final proofs0, UPQVCMJTIUPCF SFDFJWFECZ5VFTEBZ Dlose of business "QSJM Monday 5VFTEBZ8FEOFTEBZ 5IVSTEBZ 'SJEBZ &BTUFS.POEBZ Appointment 0UIFSHB[FUUFOPUJDFT (B[FUUF 1VCMJD)PMJEBZ OPUJDFTUPCF UPCFTVCNJUUFECZ SFMFBTFE TVCNJUUFECZ 8FEOFTEBZOPPO PO'SJEBZ 5VFTEBZ12 noon NPSOJOH 'JOBMQSPPGT0,UP QVCMJTI UPCFSFDFJWFE CZ8FEOFTEBZ DMPTFPGCVTJOFTT Easter Public Holidays [249] Queensland Government Gazette Extraordinary PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 377] Friday 9 March 2018 [No. 44 Transport Operations (Marine Safety) Act 1994 NOTIFICATION OF REVOCATION OF GAZETTE NOTICE Maritime Safety Queensland Cairns I, Captain Michael Barnett, Regional Harbour Master (Cairns), Maritime Safety Queensland, pursuant to the provision of section 206A of the Transport Operations (Marine Safety) Act 1994 hereby revoke the Notification of Speed Limit for the waters of Tinaroo Dam published on page 999 of the Queensland Government Gazette No. 98 dated 25 August 2017. Mariners are reminded of their general safety obligation and urged to navigate with caution at all times. Mariners are to be aware of numerous underwater hazards and the danger of sunken logs and debris in the waters of Tinaroo Dam. Captain Michael Barnett Regional Harbour Master (Cairns) Maritime Safety Queensland Dated: 9th March 2018 © The State of Queensland 2018 Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without prior written permission. Inquiries should be addressed to: Gazette Advertising, GPO Box 2457, Brisbane QLD 4001.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Coast Highway Multi-Modal Corridor Study
    Department of Transport and Main Roads Study finding's Buses Traffic analysis Buses currently play an important role in the movement of people A detailed traffic analysis process was undertaken to determine along and beyond the Gold Coast Highway corridor to a wide the number of traffic lanes, intersection configuration and Gold Coast Highway (Burleigh Heads to Tugun) range of destinations. Consistent with the approach adopted performance of the Gold Coast Highway now and into the future. in the previous stages of the light rail, some bus routes would The analysis confirmed that the nearby Mi (Varsity Lakes to Tugun) be shortened or replaced (such as the current route 700 and upgrade will perform a critical transport function on the southern 777 buses along the Gold Coast Highway), while other services Gold Coast providing the opportunity to: Multi-modal Corridor Study would be maintained and potentially enhanced to offer better • accommodate a significant increase in vehicle demands connectivity overall. including both local demands on service roads and regional demands on the motorway itself. This study has identified the need for buses to continue to connect March 2020 communities to the west of the Gold Coast Highway to key centres • improve local connections to the Mi and service roads including and interchanges with light rail. Connections between bus and a new connection between the Mi and 19th Avenue. light rail will be designed to be safe, convenient and accessible. Planning for the future This significant increase in capacity will provide through traffic Further work between TMR. TransLink and City of Gold Coast will with a viable alternative, reducing demand on the Gold Coast The Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) has confirm the design of transport interchanges and the network of Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Better M1 2 WORKING TOGETHER for QUEENSLAND BUILDING a BETTER M1
    2020 POLICY DOCUMENT Building a Better M1 2 WORKING TOGETHER FOR QUEENSLAND BUILDING A BETTER M1 WORKING TOGETHER FOR QUEENSLAND WORKING TOGETHER FOR QUEENSLAND BUILDING A BETTER M1 1 Message from the Premier Labor is building a better M1. Under my government, two major M1 upgrades at the Gateway Merge and between Mudgeeraba and Varsity Lakes have been delivered. Two more are underway now, between Eight Mile Plains and Daisy Hill, and Varsity Lakes and Tugun. We’re not stopping there. My government has a $5 billion plan to cut travel times and improve safety on Queensland’s busiest highway. That includes $2.7 billion in new projects to be delivered, which will support Queensland’s economic recovery with more than 1,390 jobs. Under our plan, we will commit $500 million for the next major M1 upgrade between Daisy Hill and Logan, locking in this jointly funded $1 billion project. Our M1 exit upgrade program will support growing communities, targeting exits at Yatala North, Yatala South, Pimpama and Ormeau. My government will build the Second M1 too, taking cars off the M1 with a $1.5 billion partnership locked in with the Federal Government to start work next year on Stage 1 between Coomera and Nerang as part of our economic recovery plan. The previous LNP Government, with Deb Frecklington as Campbell Newman’s Assistant Minister, ignored the M1 and scrapped plans for the second M1. Not one new dollar was committed to upgrade the M1 by the LNP as they cut $1.6 billion from Queensland’s roads budget and sacked 700 road builders.
    [Show full text]
  • EPBC Act Referral
    EPBC Act referral Note: PDF may contain fields not relevant to your application. These fields will appear blank or unticked. Please disregard these fields. Title of proposal 2020/8646 - Stage 1 Coomera Connector Section 1 Summary of your proposed action 1.1 Project industry type Transport - Land 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities The Australian and Queensland Government are committed to ensuring the efficiency and safety of the M1 Pacific Motorway (M1) as a key component of the National Land Transport Network. The M1 is the highest-trafficked road in Queensland and is an enabling link for long distance traffic (freight, tourism, commercial and commuter) between economic hubs on the east coast of Queensland and New South Wales. The lack of capacity on the road network between Brisbane and the Gold Coast was highlighted as a problem in the Infrastructure Australia Audit. The 2015 Audit identified the M3/M1 Pacific Motorway in the top ten road corridors with the highest projected delay cost by 2031 nationally, and the section from Beenleigh to Helensvale as the third largest projected delay cost in the corridor in Queensland in 2031. The 2019 Audit projected the cost of congestion for the Brisbane, Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast area to increase to over $9 billion by 2031. The Brisbane to Gold Coast corridor has been, and will continue to be, one of the fastest growing areas in Australia. The cities of Logan and Gold Coast will continue to experience high rates of residential growth, while the city of Brisbane will have the highest growth in employment in Queensland – thereby being an important source of employment for commuting residents in Logan and on the Gold Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Architects & Non Practising Architects
    REGISTER OF ARCHITECTS & NON PRACTISING ARCHITECTS Copyright The Board of Architects of Queensland supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of information. However, copyright protects this document. The Board of Architects of Queensland has no objection to this material being reproduced, made available online or electronically , provided it is for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation; this material remains unaltered and the Board of Architects of Queensland is recognised as the owner. Enquiries should be addressed to: [email protected] Register As At 29 June 2021 In pursuance of the provision of section 102 of Architects Act 2002 the following copy of the Register of Architects and Non Practicing Architects is published for general information. Reg. No. Name Address Bus. Tel. No. Architects 5513 ABAS, Lawrence James Ahmad Gresley Abas 03 9017 4602 292 Victoria Street BRUNSWICK VIC 3056 Australia 4302 ABBETT, Kate Emmaline Wallacebrice Architecture Studio (07) 3129 5719 Suite 1, Level 5 80 Petrie Terrace Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia 5531 ABBOUD, Rana Rita BVN Architecture Pty Ltd 07 3852 2525 L4/ 12 Creek Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 Australia 4524 ABEL, Patricia Grace Elevation Architecture 07 3251 6900 5/3 Montpelier Road NEWSTEAD QLD 4006 Australia 0923 ABERNETHY, Raymond Eric Abernethy & Associates Architects 0409411940 7 Valentine Street TOOWONG QLD 4066 Australia 5224 ABOU MOGHDEB EL DEBES, GHDWoodhead 0403 400 954 Nibraz Jadaan Level 9, 145 Ann Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 Australia 4945 ABRAHAM,
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Coast City Freight Plan 2018-2028
    Gold Coast City Freight Plan 2018–2028 Partnering with industry to develop a safer, more efficient and sustainable freight network for the Gold Coast. Mayor’s message The City of Gold Coast (City) recognises and long-term plan that helps deliver that keeping the city’s road network a safe and sustainable freight network. flowing is a social and economic driver. Maintaining our unique and enviable We have taken the time to speak Gold Coast lifestyle is an increasingly with the freight industry, to develop important priority as our city grows. a plan that provides certainty for the operators with better freight access Infrastructure and transport play and opportunities. significant roles in upholding and evolving the liveability of our city. As our population, tourism and economy continues to grow, the The freight industry contributes an City Freight Plan plays a critical role estimated $1.47 billion to the in prioritising the actions required to Gold Coast economy annually and ensure freight continues to service and employs over 6200 people locally. This support our vibrant and connected city. important industry ensures the safe and efficient delivery of thousands of vital Our focus is on ensuring we keep the goods and services – including building city moving, and this plan will help us supplies, fuel, medicine, groceries, to get there. postal, and waste removal. To ensure we can service our population growth we must plan for a future freight network that is fit for purpose. The TOM TATE City Freight Plan is a contemporary MAYOR B Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Michael CRANDON Mp Member for Coomera
    .» Michael CRANDON mp Member for Coomera November 19*'^ 2018 Queensland Legislative Assembly Number: STG (Q~nSA Tabled Hon. Curtis Pitt By Leave Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland Brisbane Clerk's Signature: Dear Mr Speaker I write pursuant to Standing Order 269(2) in relation to possible Contempt’s of the Legislative Assembly committed by the Member for Miller. I ask that the Member for Miller be referred to the Ethics Committee to determine whether he has committed a Contempt of the Assembly by deliberately misleading the House on numerous occasions. Please find below the grounds for my complaint. The Member for Miller’s statements to the House focus on two matters - Ml funding and the Inter Regional Transport Corridor (IRTC), and the Gazettal process of the IRTC: These possible Contempt’s relate to the statements made by the Member for Miller, over time, to the House during various sittings. I will deal with the matters separately: M1 Funding The Member has consistently, over time, made accusations to the effect that the Newman LNP Government did nothing on the Ml and/or did nothing for the Ml as regards to funding, planning or construction. These propositions are not correct and the Member knew they were not correct. Indeed, even when the inaccuracy of his statements were pointed out to him and documents were tabled in the House proving so, the Member continued to make statements to the same effect. The following examples of statements in the House and other material, as attached, demonstrates the above: M Bailey, 'Private Members' Statements: Palaszczuk Labor Government, Achievements', Queensland, Debates, 10 October 2017, p 2912: ..
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast District
    152°30'E NORTH COAST DISTRICT 153°0'E METROPOLITAN DISTRICT 153°30'E U 2 B 8 e R A B v La 8 I k S A e 0 >>34 S >>97 BIRKDALE Dr ! 1 k L Mining INDOOROOPILLY o Peel Is. 0 O n R e ! ster d Dunwich t BEENLEIGH che o k an n 1 R B M Co v iv U >>5 # 0 c a er B C s m k S U H Pine U 2 r il M R p ls A 9 d o A LEGEND L R 8 1 a K 2 O C R A d o U96 n c oa y d I G w d u BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL T n N S 2 27°30'S e h BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL A P P ) n 27°30'S i a k W p N v l R o a t B G R n a t a R t H k y A d O 5<< y 1 h e a d o i E MOUNT CROSBY r C n o C l KENMORE d g y S i A a 1 ! 97<< a n i C r n o L Cleveland Pt. r U r P n x U re B e h N 201 d o Raby Bay STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD 12A 9 a P I l YERONGA 201 w l h s v e 9 D y ea F E g l C p i ie san D d a C l CHANDLER 8 e t t y w 3 k I R CRIMSTON 2 w B w a o L C s n R E n a 905 1 S A ! 12 u o 2 T Fin r 1 ir e o H A b uc e S d O S ( ane C V h y d a F d k S N FUTURE STATE-CONTROLLED ROAD 4 11 c a PINE MOUNTAIN CR c T HOLLAND R 2 T d d o COOLANA d R d U R i R m n A L a i e o d 23 i a w l l CAPALABA R Mon k L l s m R L s M ao o a PAR K u S m uth Mt Crosby E PULLENVALE A p hA >>8 E n L R I a s B v a S R d I Sil ar R ALEXANDRA CLEVELAND OTHER ROAD n R LOGAN CITY e Hu E ! kw d - g R R M t T h o d G r es IVE o Y Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Gold Coast Transport Strategy Technical
    Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031: Technical Report 10. Road and freight network Objective: To develop and manage an efficient road network that meets the city’s needs for the movement of people and goods, and can be safely shared by all users. Introduction n Pacific Motorway upgrades to eight lanes from Logan Motorway to Smith Street and six lanes from Smith Street to Worongary The Gold Coast’s road network connects people to places – jobs, (Queensland Government project) education, shopping, recreation and services. n the Bermuda Street extension (Reedy Creek Road to Pacific Motorway) Using the road network wisely is vital to the success of the overall n construction of the Nielsens Road extension (Birmingham Road to transport system, and the economic, environmental and social Nerang-Broadbeach Road) wellbeing of our city. The Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031 aims to improve and expand the city’s road network in a way that maximises n local arterial roads in new development areas including the Helensvale its potential to connect people and places in more sustainable ways. Road connection (Gold Coast railway line to Hope Island Road). Current situation – a snapshot Challenges Council is responsible for nearly 3000 kilometres of local roads, Congestion increasing at a rate of about 3 per cent per year for the past 15 years, More people are driving more cars, and driving further than at any predominantly in new urban developments. The Department of time in the past. This is placing increased pressure on the road network Transport and Main Roads is responsible for almost 450 kilometres and causing increased traffic congestion, especially during peak hours, of main roads on the Gold Coast such as Southport-Burleigh weekends and peak holiday times.
    [Show full text]
  • A Shared Future: Collaborative Opportunities for South East Queensland
    1 A Shared Future: Collaborative Opportunities for South East Queensland 2015-2016 Federal Advocacy Document Contents The Council of Mayors (SEQ): One Region, One Voice 3 Why support South East Queensland? 4 Why does collaboration between Governments matter? 4 Why now? 5 Where do we start? 5 Summary of Recommendations 6 Building the Backbone: Transport and Road Infrastructure Priorities for SEQ 9 Transformative Economic and Social Infrastructure for SEQ 18 Innovative Infrastructure Funding for Economic Growth in SEQ 20 Unified Catchment Planning for SEQ: The Resilient Rivers Initiative 21 Attracting Major Investment to SEQ 25 A Safe and Smart SEQ 26 Delivering Natural Disaster Resilience across SEQ 27 Housing Affordability for SEQ 29 An SEQ Olympics for all Australians 30 3 The Council of Mayors (SEQ): The Council of Mayors (SEQ): One Region, One Voice 3 One Region, One Voice Why support South East Queensland? 4 Why does collaboration between Governments matter? 4 Why now? 5 Where do we start? 5 The Council of Mayors (SEQ) is Australia’s largest regional local government advocacy organisation, Summary of Recommendations 6 representing the South East Queensland (SEQ) region. Building the Backbone: The membership of the Council of Mayors (SEQ) includes Brisbane, Gold Coast, Ipswich, Lockyer Valley, Transport and Road Infrastructure Priorities for SEQ 9 Logan, Moreton Bay, Redland, Scenic Rim, Somerset, Sunshine Coast and Toowoomba Councils. Transformative Economic and Social Infrastructure for SEQ 18 Innovative Infrastructure Funding for
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Special Purpose Vehicles Local Government Network
    Queensland Special Purpose Vehicles Local Government Network Last updated: July 2021 Purpose: This table lists routes and areas for which Special Purpose Vehicle access have been granted access by Local Governments in Queensland under the National Class 1 Special Purpose Vehicle Notice (2021) Access Restrictions (if any) Road Manager Access Level Restriction Suburb Restriction type Structure name Road name Condition(s) Latitude Longitude Balonne Shire Council All Roads None N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A The maximum allowable speed is 60km/h on unsealed roads. All roads Vehicle speed is restricted to 40km/h on approaches to any unsealed road intersection. Vehicles must not traverse unsealed roads when the road is visibly wet. Banana Geneva Rd Banana Wardles Rd Camboon Defence Rd Dakenba Dudarkos Rd Dumgree Inverness Rd Kinnoul Injune Rd Lawgi Dawes Harsants Rd Lonesome Creek Castle Creek Rd Lonesome Creek Travel is not permitted on Freemans Rd Travel is not permitted unsealed segments of from 7:00am to 9:00am, Mt Murchison road from 7:00am to Callide Creek Crossing Travel Roads with Travel Conditions and 3:00pm and 4:30pm Unsealed Road N/A N/A 9:00am, and 3:00pm and condition (School bus times during Prospect Baths Rd 4:30pm (School bus times the school term) Prospect during the school term) Semples Rd Banana Shire Council Prospect Ziebarths Rd Thangool Lookerbie Circle Rd Thangool McLaughlins Rd Thangool Russells Ln Thangool Thangool Lookerbie Rd Thangool Tollemaches Rd Westwood Wowan Westwood Rd Woolein Overdeen Rd Camboon 40km/hr - 20t
    [Show full text]