Implementation of a Volumetric 3D Standard Brain in Manduca Sexta
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Anisometric Brain Dimorphism Revisited: Implementation of a Volumetric 3D Standard Brain in Manduca sexta BASIL EL JUNDI, WOLF HUETTEROTH, ANGELA E. KURYLAS, AND JOACHIM SCHACHTNER* Department of Biology, Animal Physiology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany ABSTRACT labeled 10 female glomeruli that were homologous to pre- Lepidopterans like the giant sphinx moth Manduca sexta are viously quantitatively described male glomeruli including known for their conspicuous sexual dimorphism in the ol- the MGC. In summary, the neuropil volumes reveal an iso- factory system, which is especially pronounced in the an- metric sexual dimorphism in M. sexta brains. This propor- tennae and in the antennal lobe, the primary integration tional size difference between male and female brain neu- center of odor information. Even minute scents of female ropils masks an anisometric or disproportional dimorphism, pheromone are detected by male moths, facilitated by a which is restricted to the sex-related glomeruli of the an- huge array of pheromone receptors on their antennae. The tennal lobes and neither mirrored in other normal glomeruli associated neuropilar areas in the antennal lobe, the glo- nor in higher brain centers like the calyces of the mushroom meruli, are enlarged in males and organized in the form of bodies. Both the female and male 3D standard brain are also the so-called macroglomerular complex (MGC). In this study used for interspecies comparisons, and may serve as future we searched for anatomical sexual dimorphism more down- volumetric reference in pharmacological and behavioral ex- stream in the olfactory pathway and in other neuropil areas periments especially regarding development and adult plas- in the central brain. Based on freshly eclosed animals, we created a volumetric female and male standard brain and ticity. J. Comp. Neurol. 517:210–225, 2009. compared 30 separate neuropilar regions. Additionally, we © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Indexing terms: brain; olfactory system; antennal lobe; insect; neuropil; digital neuroanatomy Brains are typically organized in defined substructures or Compared to most vertebrate brains, insect brains are min- modules, which can usually be characterized by their spatial iature versions typically comprised of a lower number of neu- location, gross anatomy, and often by a certain function. For rons and modules. Owing to the lower complexity and certain example, in vertebrates the olfactory bulbs and in insects the technical advantages, insects have been widely used as mod- antennal lobes have been attributed to be the first processing els to study principal mechanisms of information processing centers for olfactory information (for a review, see Hildebrand and integration, in the context of defined sensory inputs but and Shepherd, 1997). Olfactory bulbs and antennal lobes also complex behaviors including learning (e.g., Menzel, 2001; (ALs) can be found at the entrance of the olfactory nerve or the Heisenberg, 2003). antennal nerve in the brain. They are typically comprised of Brains of animals of the same or of evolutionary related olfactory glomeruli which represent functional units for odor species typically share the same principal organization. For processing containing thousands of synapses between olfac- example, in neopteran insects the central olfactory pathway tory sensory neurons (OSNs) from the olfactory epithelium/ antenna and neurons of the olfactory bulbs/ALs. Each glomer- ulus receives input from OSNs expressing particular odorant receptors (Vosshall, 2000; Korsching, 2002; Jefferis and Hum- Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of mel, 2006; Mombaerts, 2006) and odors are finally encoded by this article. Grant sponsor: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Grant number: Scha activation patterns of defined sets of glomeruli, resulting in a 678/3-3 (to J.S.). spatial odor map and a chemotopic representation of odor The first two authors contributed equally to this work. information in the brain (Galizia et al., 1999; Leon and John- *Correspondence to: J. Schachtner, Department of Biology, Animal son, 2003; Wang et al., 2003; Vosshall and Stocker, 2007; Physiology, Philipps-University, Karl-von-Frisch-Strasse 8, D-35032 Mar- burg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Namiki and Kanzaki, 2008; Staudacher et al., 2009). Depend- Received 27 June 2008; Revised 5 December 2008; Accepted 1 July 2009 ing on the species, the complexity of the brain, which is DOI 10.1002/cne.22150 expressed by the number and the complexity of brain mod- Published online July 17, 2009 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley. ules, is extremely variable. com). 211 seems to be well conserved (Strausfeld et al., 1998; MATERIALS AND METHODS Schachtner et al., 2005). However, even within the same Animals species, no brain is identical with the next, differing in size and shape of certain brain modules. These individual dif- Moths (M. sexta; Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) were kept in ferences can result from a variety of parameters that influ- walk-in environmental chambers at 26°C under a long-day ؍ ence brain organization during development but also during photoperiod (L:D 17:7) and were fed an artificial diet (Bell adulthood. In insects, such factors include brood temper- and Joachim, 1978). Under these conditions only freshly eclosed adults were weighed and prepared for reconstruction. ature, sex, age, and experience (Groh et al., 2004; Technau, For generation of a female and a male standard brain we used 2007; Molina and O’Donnell, 2008). 12 female brains and 12 male brains. For the glomerulus To study sexual brain dimorphism or the influence of volumes of the female antennal lobe we reconstructed 11 defined parameters—ranging from single molecules to so- antennal lobes of brains, which were in part also used for the cial experience—on brain development or adult plasticity, female standard brain. Volume values of 16 male antennal average or standardized brains or brain areas are needed to lobes were taken from Huetteroth and Schachtner (2005). overcome the problem of individual variations. Advances in imaging techniques, 3D reconstruction software, and com- Immunohistochemistry puter power led so far to 3D reconstructions and subse- For wholemount staining we adapted and refined the stain- quent standardization of brain areas of three insect spe- ing protocols described by Huetteroth and Schachtner (2005) cies, including Drosophila (Rein et al., 2002; Jenett et al., and Kurylas et al. (2008). The whole brains were dissected 2006), the honeybee (Brandt et al., 2005), and the desert under cold saline (Weevers, 1966) and fixed subsequently at locust (Kurylas et al., 2008). To obtain such a standard 4°C overnight in a solution composed of one part formalde- insect brain, two methods have so far been established: the hyde (37%, Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), one part methanol, virtual insect brain (VIB) protocol and the iterative shape and eight parts phosphate-buffered saline (PBS 0.01 M, pH averaging (ISA) method. The main rationale for the devel- 7.4). These brains were then rinsed in 0.01 M PBS for 1 hour at opment of the VIB protocol was to compare brain areas room temperature followed by preincubation overnight at 4°C between wildtype and genetically manipulated Drosophila in 5% normal goat serum (NGS; Jackson ImmunoResearch, (Rein et al., 2002; Jenett et al., 2006). The ISA method, first Westgrove, PA) in 0.01 M PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 used for the honeybee, was primarily aimed to register (PBST) and 0.02% sodium azide. The monoclonal primary single reconstructed neurons from various individuals into antibody from mouse against a fusion protein consisting of a one standard brain (Rohlfing et al., 2004; Brandt et al., glutathione-S-transferase and the first amino acids of the According to Kurylas et al. (2008), who compared presynaptic vesicle protein synapsin I coded by its 5-end .(2005 both protocols for the standardization of the brain of the (SYNORF1, Klagges et al., 1996) was used to selectively label desert locust, each protocol has its advantages. The VIB neuropilar areas in the brain (3C11, #151101 (13.12.06), kindly script, which preserves volumetric consistency in the pro- provided by Dr. E. Buchner, Wu¨rzburg). Its specificity in M. cess of standardization, is ideally suited for inter- and in- sexta was shown in Western blots by Utz et al. (2008). It was traspecific comparisons of neuropils, including sex-specific diluted 1:100 in PBST containing 1% NGS: in this solution the differences (Kurylas et al., 2008). The ISA method, on the brains were incubated for 5–6 days at 4°C. other hand, which provides a better representation of rela- Subsequently the brains were rinsed six times in 2 hours tive locations of brain areas, is the choice to produce a with PBST before they were incubated with the secondary brain atlas, which can be used as a framework to register goat antimouse antibody conjugated to Cy5 (1:300, catalog code 115-175-146, lot 71608, Jackson ImmunoResearch) in neurons or neuron populations from different individuals PBST and 1% NGS for 4 days at 4°C. After this time the brains (Ku et al., 2007; Kurylas et al., 2008). were rinsed again with PBST six times in 2 hours. Thereafter In the current study, we reconstructed in three dimen- the brains were dehydrated in an ascending alcohol series sions and subsequently standardized brain areas of both (50%–100%, 15 minutes each) and then cleared in methyl sexes of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta using the VIB salicylate